16-3284 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Chapter 11 Appeal Case - MOTION For CONTINUANCE of September 27, 2016

Stan J.
Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
:
CASE NO. 16-3284

U.S. District Court Case No. 16-cv-49
:
MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE

AND NOW, on this 27th day of September, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE in the above captioned case. At about 7:00pm on Monday September

26, 2016 a Lancaster City Police Officer appeared at the residence of the APPELLANT'S
home and rang the door bell, which the APPELLANT ignored.
Previously the
APPEALLANT has filed several complaints of misconduct and obstruction of justice

against the same said police department, including Chief Kieth Sadler and Detective
Clark Bearinger.
There are currently 2 such cases in Pennsylvania Appellate Courts,
Superior Court Case No. 1924 MDA 2016, and Supreme Court Case No. 496 MAL 2016.
There are several Cases in the U.S. District Court that have been WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for reasons but not limited to computer hacking; harassment;
assaults; vandalism to real property; and threats of violence against the APPEALLANT.
The most recent cases are 16-cv-04641 and 16-cv-04014. At approximately 8:00 pm on
Monday evening the APPELLANT, under duress, fled the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
to take refuge in Plantation, Florida with family.
The APPEALLANT HAS BEEN
ASSAULTED WITH PHYSICAL FORCE BY OFFICERS OF THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE

DEPARTMENT ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS IN THE PAST AND WAS NOT GOING TO LET IT
HAPPEN AGAIN. The APPEALLANT requests the court to grant this continuance while
the APPELLANT seeks safe harbor and considers his options for redress and relief by the
courts.
Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance
Page 1 of 19
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Again, the APPELLANT had to file a Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas for intervention and relief in regards to
medical professionals refusing to continue the prescriptions of pain medications for his
daily suffering of acute pain, which in itself is a form of torture. Earlier that day the
APPELLANT visited the Lancaster County Prothonotary and was finally given the case
no., which is CI-16-08472. On Friday, the APPELLANT filed an exhibit containing audio
recordings that are damaging to the Lancaster City Police Department and the
APPELLANT suspects that another fabricated 302 mental health warrant may be filed in
rataliation and in an effort to again discredit the APPELANT'S ACCUSATIONS AND
OBSTRUCT THE APPELANT'S claims not being litigated in both state and federal courts.
Dated September 27, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
Page 2 of 19
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Page 3 of 19
EXHIBIT
Page 4 of 19
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
June 22, 2016
THEY WANT TO KILL ME
DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE re LANCASTER CITY

POLICE ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF LATE
__________________________________________________
If you watch the video of the Press Conference by Stedman and Sadler you will notice that
Gregory S. Bayne, 35, a father of three , was minding his own business not bothering anyone. If
you research the availability of restrooms for the homeless, or anyone for that matter, you will
find that there are few if any. Now the only available are at the Lancaster City Police Station when
Central Market is not opened. The Red Rose Transit Station closed thiers to the public due to
continued vandalism. Now, all the Lancaster City Police had to do was to give Gregory Byne a
simple warning and treat him not as an inconvenience, but rather as someone who was having
difficulty navigating life at that time. Remember how many people became just like Gregory
Bayne after the RECESSION of 2007. There are many still without jobs from that era. MOST
IMPORTANTLY, NOTICE THE POSTURE OF THE 2 POLICE OFFICERS IT WAS THAT OF
AGGRESSION FROM THE START.
THIS IS WHAT THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE WANT TO DO TO ME, NO DOUBT IN
MY MIND AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE OTHERWISE GIVEN THE ATTACK BY
THE PIT BULL ON JUNE 10, AND THE STALKING OF 8 OR SO POLICE DURING THE PRIDE
FEST ON SUNDAY JUNE 19 th WHEN TODD UMSTEAD AND COMPANY SURROUNDED ME IN
A CIRCLE FOR NO REASON AND THEN JUST WALKED AWAY WHEN THE DID NOT GET
WHAT THE WANTED, WHATEVER THAT WAS.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Page 5 of 19
District Attorney: Police Shooting of

homeless man was 'clearly
justified'
JEFF HAWKES Staff Writer
Jun 28, 2013
A police officer was justified in fatally shooting a homeless man who lunged at another officer with a
9-inch knife, the district attorney announced Friday, saying he would not prosecute the officer.
The shooting happened June 10 in downtown Lancaster after police stopped the man for urinating in
public.
"The officers involved showed restraint, critical decision-making and attempts to de-escalate the level
of force prior to the fatal shot," District Attorney Craig Stedman said. "This case is closed."
DOCUMENT: Read district attorney's report into shooting
Stedman said his decision to clear Officer Jose De La Torre came after he reviewed surveillance videos
and statements by the police and civilian eyewitnesses. Mayor Rick Gray, a former attorney, agreed
with Stedman's decision.
Gregory S. Bayne, 35, a father of three, suffered a single gunshot wound to the side of the abdomen
and bled to death at Lancaster General Hospital a couple of hours after the shooting, which happened
Page 6 of 19
about 7:20 a.m. in the alcove to Place Marie, 52-56 N. Queen St., authorities said.
The incident began about 7 a.m. when two officers approached Bayne at Lancaster Square in the 100
block of North Queen Street after a surveillance camera operator spotted him urinating against a
column.
The video shows Bayne taking a knife out of his pocket and charging out of the camera frame toward
De La Torre, who Stedman said was on his radio checking for warrants. De La Torre fired once, but
missed.
De La Torre and Officer David Kaminski then chased Bayne into the first block of North Queen Street.
Part of the chase was caught on a private security camera. It shows Kaminski at North Queen and
Orange streets firing a Taser electroshock weapon. The barb hit Bayne but did not stop him.
Cornered at the locked entrance of Place Marie, Bayne refused to obey the police and drop his knife,
Stedman said. Instead, Bayne, knife in hand, lunged at Officer Andrew Nauman, who had joined the
chase. De La Torre fired twice, hitting Bayne once.
Video from a security camera at the entrance to Yorgos Restaurant, 66 N. Queen St., shows Bayne and
officers in front of Place Marie, but only from the waist down. It shows Bayne moving toward an
officer and then collapsing to the sidewalk, felled by the bullet.
The fallen Bayne did not release the knife. An officer had to kick it from his hand. Bayne further
resisted arrest by keeping his hands under his body, Stedman said.
The 9-inch folding knife had a 4-inch blade. "This is obviously not a table butter knife," Stedman said,
displaying the knife. "It is an extremely dangerous weapon."
Stedman issued a 14-page report, released videos and answered media questions. The investigation was
conducted by city Detective Lt. Jarrad Berkihiser.
The district attorney said it "would have been beyond irresponsible" if the officers had allowed an
agitated, 6-foot, 3-inch, 220-pound man with a dangerous knife to escape downtown at morning rush
hour. He said it would have been "equally absurd" to try to wrestle the knife from Bayne. "The third
and only reasonable choice left was to shoot," he said.
Stedman said important evidence came from a man in a car stopped directly in front of Place Marie.
The civilian witness, who Stedman did not identify, saw the chase and fatal shooting. The driver told
investigators he believed the officers acted appropriately.
"They yelled at him. They tried Tasers. He had plenty of time in all of that to drop the knife," said
Stedman, reading from the witness's statement to investigators. "He lunged at them with the knife," the
driver said, according to Stedman, "and only then they shot him."
Neither Kaminski nor Nauman fired their service weapons. Kaminski, however, did fire a Taser X26
twice. He was the only responding officer carrying a Taser.
People who knew Bayne told reporters that he drifted between Lancaster and California and was a
generous, intelligent and resourceful man. They also said he made irrational comments suggestive of
mental illness.
But Stedman said investigators talked to someone who knew Bayne for many years and who described
the homeless man as volatile. He also told police that Bayne's behavior on June 10 "didn't surprise
him."
At the news conference, Police Chief Keith Sadler said the officers followed proper police procedure,
Page 7 of 19
even after they suspected that Bayne was mentally disturbed.

The chief said De La Torre and Kaminski were not familiar with Bayne when they approached him in
Lancaster Square. The officers heard Bayne rambling bizarrely, mentioning aliens. Within seconds,
Bayne pulled the knife.
"You cannot commit somebody (to a mental health unit) just for rambling," Sadler said.
Sadler and Stedman said the officers repeatedly showed restraint and that shooting Bayne was a last
resort Bayne provoked by lunging with his knife, first at Lancaster Square, then at Place Marie.
Sadler said that as Bayne fled Lancaster Square, Kaminski "had a clear shot at him but he didn't take it"
for fear of hitting a vehicle or pedestrian on Queen Street.
Kaminski during the chase shot Bayne with a Taser barb that Bayne pulled out while he continued to
run.
Jumping out of his patrol car at the intersection of North Queen and Orange streets, Officer Nauman
joined the chase, calling Bayne by name because he recognized him.
When the three officers cornered Bayne at Place Marie's entrance, they ordered him to drop his knife
and get on the ground. When Bayne didn't comply, Kaminski fired his Taser again, but missed. It was
his last Taser barb.
Sadler said the officers were correct not to try to subdue a knife-wielding man with their two-foot
collapsible nightsticks. "They don't have the luxury of getting a do-over in case they miss trying to get
(the knife) out of his hand," Sadler said.
The officers also carry Mace, a tear-gas spray, but Sadler said it would have been "ludicrous" to try to
subdue Bayne with Mace. He said Mace is known to not be effective against the mentally disturbed or
those in an agitated state.
Sadler also said the officers' Kevlar vests protect against gunfire, but not a knife attack. "It may protect
you from a slicing wound," but not "from a penetrating wound," he said.
The encounter at Place Marie lasted mere seconds. Stedman said Bayne turned and faced Nauman
about 10 feet away. Nauman stood between De La Torre and Kaminski.
The officers commanded Bayne to drop the knife or he would be Tased. Kaminski then fired the Taser,
but missed.
Locking eyes with Nauman, Bayne went toward him with the knife. De La Torre pulled his trigger but
missed. With Bayne continuing his attack, De La Torre fired a second shot about a second after the
first. The second shot felled Bayne.
Stedman said Nauman had drawn his .40-caliber Glock handgun and was ready to shoot, but De La
Torre shot first.
"I can't speculate on what's going on in (Bayne's) mind," Stedman said, "but the police officers don't
have to wait to find out with a knife in their throat. They've got a right to stand their ground, as
civilians do. There's no question in my mind they did what they had to do. It's a difficult choice, and a
person's life is lost unfortunately."
Stedman said the officers complied with Pennsylvania law in their decision to use deadly force. The
law says an officer is justified in using deadly force to prevent death or serious injury or to prevent the
escape of an armed and dangerous person who has committed a serious violent crime.
"This isn't a close call," Stedman said.
Page 8 of 19
Gray, a former attorney who attended the news conference, said he agrees with the district attorney's
decision.
Bayne "used a deadly weapon in an offensive manner," said Gray, describing the video showing
Bayne's initial attack at Lancaster Square as "frightening."
Gray said he expected to receive Sadler's separate report on police procedure in the incident by
Monday.
De La Torre was one of four officers who fatally shot a suspected armed robber in July 1999 at Green
and Pershing streets. De La Torre and the other officers were cleared after that incident.
The last time a city police officer shot and killed someone was 2003.
Page 9 of 19
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 10 of 19
What Gives Them The Right?
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 6, 2016
STATEMENT OF FACT re Lancaster City Police Department

v. CATERBONE FAMILY
1. 1904 According to a LANCASTER NEW ERA (recovered by Microfiche at the Lancaster
County Public Library) published news article:
1. FIRES IN CITY AND COUNTY A HOUSE DAMAGED AND BARN BURNED An

Italian Boarding Establishment Gutted on Monday Night-The Barn on J.M.E.
Rudys Farm Destroyed Monday Night
Quite a stubborn fire occurred on Monday night shortly after 10 o'clock at No. 119
Beaver street, a two-sided & half story frame building occupied by Joseph Catrabone
(CATERBONE-MY GREAT GREAT GRANDFATHER), an Italian who keeps a boarding
house for his fellow countrymen, most of them being street musicians. Most of the
boarders were in bed when the alarm of the fire was raised outside and Catty and a
couple of his compatriots were greatly excited upon learning that the rear end of
their establishment was in flames. Everybody in the place was aroused, but the
excitable Italians were not in condition to do anything but rush about, jabbering and
making confusion worse confounded. Word of the fire was sent to Fire Chief
Vondermuth at No. 5 engine house and he hurried to the scene of the fire, after
sending orders to the other companies. He took with him the new Clapp & Jones
reserve engine, which proved its merit in service, sending a heave stream and with
such force as to require three men to hand the nozzle. The fire at Catrabone's had
worked it's between the partitions and was hard to get at and the Chief kept his
men there until after midnight, before he was satisfied the fire was slumbering
between partitions. The building was badly damaged by the fire and water. The
building is owned by Frances Frailey, and her loss will be about $500. Catrabone lost
considerable furniture and his boarders a great of their effects, one of the being
minus the monkey. The poor fellow, the Italian, not the ******, went about
afterwords-bewildering the loss of de monk, which doubtless perished in
the fire. After the fire fifteen of Catty's boarders were sheltered at the police
station for the night and they had enough ***** with them to fill out an immigrant
train for a trip across the plains. The fire is supposed to have been of I
incendiary origin. While at the fire driver Edward Samoon, of No. 4 house carriage
had his left foot so badly trampled and out by his horse that Dr. Boiendies had to
put four stitches in the wound. He will be laid up for some time.
Lancaster
Case
No. 16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page11
1 of
of82
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016
2. My father (Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr.) graduated form Lancaster Catholic High School with
honor society grades, secretary or treasurer of his class, outstanding basketball player, and
he even played a musical instrument. I have original records.
3. In 1943, in Lancaster Newspaper Article, my father graduated from the Naval Air Gunners
School with Honors in Florida. It's training manual, which I have, describes the Air
Gunners as the most psychically and mentally fit servicemen in the U.S. Armed Forces with
double the pay compared to other servicemen.
4. In the 1960's my father went through a rigorous series of involuntary psychiatric
commitments and electro shock therapies initiated by the Lancaster City Police
Department; with stays at Embryville Psychiatric Hospital.
5. During the 1960's my father traveled the world including Hong Kong, Lebanon, Lisbon,
Mexico, Egypt, etc. while still operating Sam Caterbone Cleaners.
6. The Dry Cleaning Association of America awarded my father a Certificate of Recognition for
inventing a filtration system for the Dry Cleaning Industry.
7. In 1972 The Lancaster City Police arrest my father for forging a $200.00 check from
Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc. because the only signatory at that time was his wife,
Yolanda RODA Caterbone.
8. In 1972 the Lancaster City Police arrest my father for stealing $2,000.00 from the
basement of his parents home, Book Road in Lampeter, from Joseph Ricupero, his nephew.
9. At trial my father appears Pro Se and is found guilty of the forgery charge and not quilty of
the theft charge. My father spent some 2 months in prison before being released
on bail and is sentenced to 1 year probation. The $200.00 check was made out to
James Coho, the Lancaster Attorney, with Divorce Proceedings written in the
memo.
10.In August of 1973, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Johnstone
ORDERS my father vacate the vicinity of Lancaster County. In essence throwing him out
of Lancaster County. He had no other criminal record.
11.In that same year my fathers properties at 1470 Mahniem Pike are transferred to Jack and
Agnes Silverhorne for $140,000.00 Without any attempts to sell the property; no real
estate for sale sign, Just my mother's cousin Valley Palumbo representing both my mother
and Jack Silverthorne in the transaction. I am alleging that the property was worth at least
$500,000. My father owned the Dry Cleaners, plus 4 store fronts, and two houses which
stretched from the fence line at Alcoa to about 40 feet from the Park City Light. My
mother would ask me to sit in on the meetings and I kept asking her why can't we rent the
property rather than Jack Silverthorne Valley Palumbo had already negotiated the Triple
Net Leases before the settlement ever took place.
12.By the 1960's my father had worked his business and had no debt on 1250 Fremont Street
or his properties on Manhiem Pike.
13.Those incidents left my mother with no income, just the $70,000.00 which made her get a
job at Price Elementary School's cafeteria.
14.My father leaves town and moves to the Bahamas. My mother continues as a low level
Cafeteria Aid, having to start work at 5:30 am while raising me and my 3 younger
brothers.
15.In 1976 I am caring for my mother as she suffers from a clinical depression while attending
to my oldest brother, Sammy, who is trying to cope with his victimization of U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, specifically the LSD Experiments of MK-ULTRA while in the U.S. Air Force,
as he is in seclusion in the Mt. Vernon Motel on route 72 near Manhiem. Later my mother
and Uncle Ben Roda would demand he leave Lancaster and place him on a bus en route to
California.
16.In 1981 while walking to a church in Miami where my brother Steve lives, he finds my
father taking his daily walk. Before that time my father's father and sister have passed,
with no one being able to find his location or contact him.
17.In 1982 my father returns to Lancaster and lives with his mother on Book Road before
being approved for the Low Income apartment at Apartment 309 in the Church Street
Lancaster
Case
No. 16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page12
2 of
of82
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016

Sammy Caterbone, my brother, also is subjected to Psychiatric Commitments by the Lancaster City Police.
Towers in 1983. My mother immediately files for divorce when my father arrives back in
Lancaster in 1982.
18.Christmas Day of 1984 my oldest brother, Sammy, is murdered in Santa Barbara,
California, verified and confirmed by officials of the County of Santa Barbara to me in my
meeting in a Santa Barbara County Office in August of 2005.
19.In 1987 I am arrested by the Manheim Township Police Department for 4 felonies
and 3 Misdemeanors for essentially stealing my own files out of my own property,
which I had a personal guarantee obligation to the owners, Herb Fisher and Marty
Sponougle, and spent 10 days in prison, 10 days in the St. Joseph Psychiatric Ward only to
have ALL CHARGES DISMISSED IN MARCH OF 1988, WELL AFTER THE
ISC/FERRANTI MERGER WAS COMPLETED IN DECMEMBER OF 1987.
20.April 29, 1996 my youngest brother, Thomas P. Caterbone is found dead in a cottage
in Kill Devil Island, North Carolina.
21.In 2006 I am sent to the LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON for 60 days, (October 30 to
December 28) for absolutely nothing; the director of the Bail Supervision Deparmtment
Lied under OATH and Judge Allison MAILCIOIUSLY reinstated my Bail to SECURED rather
than UNSECURED and it took my APPEAL filed while incarcerated to finally free
me. My home at 220 Stone Hill Road was purposefully SOLD AT SHERRIF SALE
ON DECMEMBER 20, 2006 WHILE I COULD NOT FILE APPROPRIATE COURT
DOCUMENTS TO THWART THE ILLEGAL SALE BY FULTON BANK.
22.FAST FORWARD TO 2010 AND THE PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER
CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER....THE JULY 9, 2015 PSYCHIATRIC
COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER...AND
FINALLY THE FEBRUARY 19, 2016 PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER
CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER.
23.THEN WE HAVE THE INCIDENTS OF 2015 TO TODAY, AUGUST 6, 2016.
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400
and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016
Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016;
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349,
CI-06-03401
Lancaster
Case
No. 16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page13
3 of
of82
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016
CATERBONE
Lancaster
Case
No. 16-3284
Cityv.Police
City
Motion
ofv.
Lancaster,
CATERBONE
For Continuance
PA Since 1904
Page
Page
Page14
41 of
of
of82
233
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
September
August
March27,
8,
6, 2016
" !
#
$
%& & & " #
#!
#
!
"
"
)
"
%
#
$
"
"
"
!'
#
&
"
"
"
1
#
&
'
#
(
*
% ## ! .
"
#
/
%
"
$
)
!(
"#
"
"
,
"#
!
!
"
"
00
#
"
"
"
2,
%
"
"
1
* !
333333
#
+,
#
""
)
"#
#
33333
#
'
5 "
7
"
"
##
6
#
"
CATERBONE
Lancaster
Case
No. 16-3284
Cityv.Police
City
Motion
ofv.
Lancaster,
CATERBONE
For Continuance
PA Since 1904
Page
Page
Page15
52 of
of
of82
233
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
September
August
March27,
8,
6, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Lancaster
Case
No. 16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page16
6 of
of82
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
T1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 5, 2016
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, LANCASTER, PA UPDATE FOR AUGUST 5, 2016 Since the last
update Case No. 16-cv-49 has been appealed to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Case
No. 16-3284. On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 Stan J Caterbone was named a party in the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 108 MM 2016 for the Honorable Kathleen Kane in her
attempt at a Kings Bench Ruling. His AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF was filed and on Thursday, August
4, 2016 the COMMONWEALTH filed a No Answer letter in reply to the AMICUS BRIEF.
UPDATE: Since the last press release the NOTICE of COMPLAINT to the United States of
America, et.al., has been recorded and docketed in the United States Eastern District Court in
Philadelphia as Case No. 16-cv-4014 and is currently listed under the jurisdiction of the Honorable
Edward G. Smith in Easton, Pennsylvania.
The complaint can
be viewed at:
https://www.scribd.com/document/318998718/16-cv-4014-CATERBONE-v-the-UnitedStates-of-America-et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-ver-3-0-Full-With-Forms-July-22-2016
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 a COMPLAINT was filed with the OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE in
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals against Judge Smith and other Jurists in Philadelphia for a
host of misconduct allegations. A Motion for Recusal will be filed in the next day or so.
In addition the case outlined below, Court Rejects Man's Claim That Lancaster County's
Residents Are Torturing Him With Mind Control in Superior Court has been officially appealed to
the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Case No. 495 MAL 2016 and is now listed on the permanent
docket in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. That case started in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas as CATERBONE v. The Residents of Lancaster County, et.al.,
Also now listed on the permanent docket in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is Case No. 496
MAL 2016 in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster City Police, et.al., which is the case involving the
illegal involuntary psychiatric commitment of July 9, 2015 and includes as Defendants Detective
Clark Bearinger of the Lancaster City Police Bureau, staff of the Lancaster General Hospital,
Medical Director Dr. Sylvia Gratz and staff of Fairmount Behavioral Health System of
Philadelphia.
Now listed in the Pennsylvania Superior Court, as of Friday, is Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 in
CATERBONE v. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police. This case is the Preliminary Injunction for
Emergency Relief which was denied by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown
III.
Most importantly is the recent SHOOTINGS AT POLICE OF LANCASTER COUNTY which is major
headlines the lase few days. The Lancaster County District Attorney, Mr. Craig Stedman is quoted as
saying The last couple of days in Lancaster County are some of the darkest days we've had
in our justice system, for our police officers, that I can recall.
Stan J. Caterbone and The Advanced Media Group have been warning and begging the
major stakeholders to settle all disagreements for years and have been warning of this very
same situation to everyone in Lancaster County and through the various courts, and law
PRESS
Lancaster
Case
No.
RELEASE
16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page17
1 of
7
of82
16
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
Friday
September
August27,
5, 2016
6,

enforcement agencies. Chief Kieth Sadler even refused Formal Mediation Negotiations
through the Lancaster County Human Rights Commission in 2008. Attached is the LNP News
Coverage of the Police Shootings.
In
2009
I
had
the
Largest
Muslim
Brotherhood
On
The
Web,
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/ following me on twitter and visiting my website on
numerous occasions. Two days ago a Russian Contact has followed me on my Twitter
Account. The Twitter Account is in Russian and I have asked them who they are but have
yet to receive a response.
Below is the original PRESS RELEASE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group have given a NOTICE of COMPLAINT to the
United States of America, et.al., regarding a Civil Rights Lawsuit which will be filed in Federal
Courts, the Eastern District Court for Pennsylvania in the near future.
On May 11, 2016 the article Court rejects man's claim that Lancaster County's residents
are torturing him with mind controlBy Matt Miller of Pennlive.com, reported the following:
Rest easy, residents of Lancaster County. The state Superior Court says Stanley
Caterbone can't sue you for stalking him and messing with his mind (They did not dispute
the allegation). A panel of that court deep-sixed Carterbone's case in an opinion Judge Paula
Francisco Ott issued Tuesday. Quite frankly, Ott wrote, Caterbone gave the state judges no firm
explanation of what he was claiming or what sort of remedy he was after. Her court's ruling upholds an
August 2015 decision by county Judge Jeffery D. Wright to dismiss Caterbone's lawsuit as frivolous.
According to Ott, Caterbone, acting as his own lawyer, filed the case in county court against the
"residents of the county of Lancaster, Pennsylvania," seeking an order to halt abuse he claims he was
suffering at their hands. The Lancaster man accused countians of participating in "organized stalking
and/or electronic and mind manipulation torture being committed against him," Ott noted. Also, she
wrote, Caterbone asked the county judge to enlist the local news media in a campaign to inform
countians (Lancaster) to stop mistreating him.
Since that article the "organized stalking and/or electronic and mind manipulation torture being
committed against him (Stan J. Caterbone)," has escalated in a fevered pitch that can only elicit
one outcome if left without countermeasures murder, suicide, and or a prolonged deep
psychosis.
After the collection of authentic transcripts from other Targeted Individuals, including NSA
Whistleblower Karen Stewart , (NSA Analyst of 15 years), Army Intelligence Officer Julianne
McKinney; both of whom experience the same symptomology as Stan J. Caterbone, and
expert, advocate, and world renowned lecturer Dr. Nick Begich, Stan J. Caterbone is now prepared to
file the complaint. In 2009 President Barach Obama, Robert Gates (former Secretary of Defense and
former Director of the CIA and the National Security Agency or NSA), and countless others, were all
named in a similar complaint in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, case no. CI-08-13373,
CATERBONE v. the Duke Street Business Center, et.al.,. That case is still listed as OPEN in the
Lancaster County Prothonotary Office.
The complaint will be filed under 42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights.
In summary the statute reads: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be
subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable
to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except
that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officers
judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was
violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of
Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
PRESS
Lancaster
Case
No.
RELEASE
16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page18
2 of
8
of82
16
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
Friday
September
August27,
5, 2016
6,
Case law involving the following will be cited:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Federal Sovereign Immunity Harvard Law School Federal Budget Policy Seminar
The Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine
U.S. Intellectual Property Law
RICO - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
United States Bill of Rights
The Legal Prohibition Against Torture
The prohibition against torture is firmly embedded in customary international law, international
treaties signed by the United States, and in U.S. law. As the U.S. Department of State has noted, the
"United States has long been a vigorous supporter of the international fight against tortureEvery unit
of government at every level within the United States is committed, by law as well as by policy, to the
protection of the individual's life, liberty and physical integrity" [U.S. Department of State, "Initial
Report of the United States of America to the UN Committee Against Torture." Oct 15, 1999. (15 Nov.
2001)]. That commitment should not be abandoned. Indeed, it must be deepened as the world
watches how the U.S. responds to the challenges before it. If the U.S. were to condone torture by
government officials or foreign governments in its fight against terrorism, it would betray its own
principles, laws, and international treaty obligations. It would irreparably weaken its standing to oppose
torture elsewhere in the world. And it would provide a handy excuse to other governments to use
torture to pursue their own national security objectives (The Legal Prohibition Against Torture
https://www.hrw.org/news/2003/03/11/legal-prohibition-against-torture ).
A DRAFT OF THE COMPLAINT CAN BE VIEWED AND DOWNLOADED AT:

https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-United-States-ofAmerica-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
_______________________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court
of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case
No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-0603401
PRESS
Lancaster
Case
No.
RELEASE
16-3284
City Police
Motion
v. CATERBONE
For Continuance
Page
Page19
3 of
9
of82
16
19
Tuesday,
Saturday
Friday
September
August27,
5, 2016
6,

16-3284 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Chapter 11 Appeal Case - MOTION For CONTINUANCE of September 27, 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

16-3284 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Chapter 11 Appeal Case - MOTION For CONTINUANCE of September 27, 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stan J.

IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

CASE NO. 16-3284

MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE

CONTINUANCE in the above captioned case. At about 7:00pm on Monday September

APPEALLANT has filed several complaints of misconduct and obstruction of justice

There are currently 2 such cases in Pennsylvania Appellate Courts,

The APPEALLANT HAS BEEN

ASSAULTED WITH PHYSICAL FORCE BY OFFICERS OF THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Dated September 27, 2016

1250 Fremont Street

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

ACTIVE COURT CASES

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

1250 Fremont Street

DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE re LANCASTER CITY

1250 Fremont Street

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

District Attorney: Police Shooting of

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

even after they suspected that Bayne was mentally disturbed.

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Case No. 16-3284 Motion For Continuance

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

What Gives Them The Right?

1250 Fremont Street

STATEMENT OF FACT re Lancaster City Police Department

1. FIRES IN CITY AND COUNTY A HOUSE DAMAGED AND BARN BURNED An

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

1250 Fremont Street

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

T1250 Fremont Street

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

Case law involving the following will be cited:

A DRAFT OF THE COMPLAINT CAN BE VIEWED AND DOWNLOADED AT:

1250 Fremont Street

ACTIVE COURT CASES

You might also like