Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An absurd outcome of the directive to minimize costs might be that no department does any
work and avoids acquiring or using any resources. That, however, ignores the opportunity
costs of lost outputs. Since opportunity costs almost never show up on accounting reports, it
is easy for managers to ignore or be unaware of them. A less extreme but possibly damaging
outcome could be for each department to minimize the costs of its assigned work, but
ignore its impacts on other just the right amounts of output when needed), then minimizing
the cost of each process will minimize overall costs. Most organizations are not perfectly
balanced, however, and minimizing the costs of each process may impair the ability of
another process to meet its objectives. Thus, one process may produce too much output,
leading to waste. Another process may produce too little output, leading to missed
opportunities for other processes that depend on the former process output. Unexpected or
changed demands from internal and external customers may require changes in schedules
and outputs in many parts of the company. To not meet those changes could result in
significant opportunity costs for the company as a whole. Thus, encouraging managers to
focus only on their process(es) may be a myopic management policy. Companies also need
to encourage cooperation among departments.
1.27
1.40
Benefit-cost analysis.
(Note: Costs in tables are rounded to two decimals, but solutions use exact decimals. Transactions in
column D are rounded up.)
a.
Number of transactions
A
a. Number of transactions,
CAS Accounting Operation
CAS number of
transactions per year
Accounting operation
Accounts receivable
50,000
12.00
General ledger
23,000
7.00
3,286
Accounts payable
35,000
9.00
3,889
Payroll
20,000
6.00
3,334
9,000
11.00
819
(D = B/C)
(rounded up)
4,167
Other companies in the same industry may have lower average costs for several reasons.
One reason may be that other companies have more efficient accounting operations and
personnel (e.g., require less data entry or manual processing) and, therefore, use fewer
resources to accomplish the same level of work. This can happen if resources necessary to
1
process transactions (e.g., personnel) are hired at fully-employed costs (e.g., salaries) but are
not fully used. Another reason may be that CAS operates its accounting functions at a lower
volume of transactions than other companies but has comparable spending (e.g., employee
salaries) for the types of accounting transactions the same level of cost divided by fewer
transactions yields a higher average cost than the association average.
c.
There are two types of cost savings possible out-of-pocket savings of resources that are
not needed and freed-up resources that can be used elsewhere and they may not be the
same amounts. Because we do not know how CAS obtains and pays for accounting
resources, this solution assumes that computed savings are out-of-pocket savings.
B
A
Accounting Operation
Accounting Operation
Accounts receivable
General ledger
Accounts payable
Payroll
Credit & collections
d.
CAS Number of
Transactions
D
Association cost per
transaction
4,167
3,286
3,889
3,334
819
E
CAS Cost Savings per
Year (rounded) (E =
BD)
$ 8.00
4.00
5.00
2.50
6.00
$ 4.00
3.00
4.00
3.50
5.00
$ 16,668
9,858
15,556
11,669
4,095
SDC
SDC Number of
Transactions
(same as CAS)
SDC Cost
Advantage per
Year (D = B x C)
(rounded)
$ 23,335
Accounts receivable
4,167
General ledger
3,286
3.80
12,487
Accounts payable
3,889
5.00
19,445
Payroll
3,334
4.00
13,336
819
6.20
5,078
Accounting Operation
73,681
It is important to know the amount of cost advantage because this represents resources that
the competitor does not have to use on accounting procedures. This reduced resource use
can be a cost saving or it can be applied to more productive uses. In either case, the
competitor can be more profitable.
e.
Companies in competitive industries seek to generate the most return from their resources.
If a company has a cost disadvantage in any of its operations that is not offset by greater
benefits, the company will steadily lose ground to competitors. Thus, companies compare
(or benchmark) their operations against competitors. It may be possible to gain an
advantage over competitors if a company can achieve performance comparable to the best
practices in the world, which may be practiced by companies not in the same industry.
1.41
a.
If ValOil outsources its tax planning and tax return preparation operations, it could save at
least the following amounts:
2
ValOil could save more than this amount if some portion of the information systems cost
(personnel, hardware, and software) also could be eliminated by outsourcing tax operations.
Therefore, Dinosaur should be inclined to pay anything less than 22,800,000kr for tax
services, or more, depending on how much additional information systems cost could be
saved by outsourcing.
b.
ValOil must be concerned about the quality of the tax services as well as the price paid (now
and in the future). The external service provider must be thoroughly familiar with the tax
regulations in each of the areas where the company must report. Quality of service is
especially important for tax planning since these services must be timely and in tune with
company goals and competitive pressures.
c.
The first-year cost of the package of outsourced services is 33 million kr (21 + 12 million kr),
and thereafter is only 21 million kr. Expected annual savings = 7,800,000 + 15,000,000 +
2,4000,000 kr = 25,200,000 kr.
Year
Outsourced Service
Costs
Net Savings
1
(33,000,000kr)
25,200,000kr
(7,800,000kr)
2
(21,000,000)
25,200,000
4,200,000
3
(21,000,000)
25,200,000
4,200,000
4
(21,000,000)
25,200,000
4,200,000
5
(21,000,000)
25,200,000
4,200,000
Total
9,000,000kr
This appears to be a favorable outsourcing arrangement (given concerns in part b).
1.47
Ethical issuefraud
This situation is based on an actual case where a manager and an accountant conspired to
overstate sales and profits. Why would they do this? Perhaps the managers compensation depended
on sales or profits. Perhaps they wanted the companys financial performance to look better. In any
case, these were criminal fraudulent activities.
In the actual case, the fraudulent activities were discovered by people who worked in the
accounting department who discovered the invoices and shipping documents tucked away in the desk
drawer of the accountant who colluded to commit the fraud. The friend was among those charged
with the fraud because she knew about it and was suspected to be involved. She was eventually cleared
of wrongdoing, but not until after several years of defending herself against the charges. She lost her
job, and she lost a lot of time. If she were faced with similar circumstances again, she says she would
immediately inform the head of the accounting department, and at least two other people in the
organization who were higher than her boss. Her initial contact would not be to accuse the alleged
perpetrators of committing fraud, but would inquire as to the propriety of their actions in view of the
companys accounting and sales policies. In this way, she would avoid accusing someone of misbehavior
before she had proof that what they did was wrong. If her inquiries were ignored, she would begin
looking for a new job.
2.17
Our preference for committed cost is more than semantic. Cost managers should be
challenging the existence of any cost or use of resources in an organization. Unfortunately,
labeling some costs as fixed may deflect scrutiny. In some organizations, so-called fixed
costs are growing faster than sales. How does one account for that if these are fixed costs?
Most costs in organizations lie somewhere between committed and discretionary, and these
costs can be changed. Whether they should be changed is a matter of applying cost-benefit
analysis tools. Note: changing methods or estimates of lives and salvage values can change
even depreciation, a so-called fixed cost.
2,036,000
1,239,000
797,000
272,000
304,000
221,000
135,000
102,000
313,000
415,000
81,000
334,000
482,000
127,000
14,000
87,000
74,000
103,000
12,000
417,000
1,233,000
1,368,000
142,000
1,226,000
160,000
1,386,000
147,000
1,239,000
4
2.22
Period (P)
Variable (V)
Product (R)
F*
i.
j.
Cost Item
*Fixed with respect to activity. Utility costs vary, however, with respect to the weather.
2.32
a.
b.
c.
Purchases
Material
used
Material
ending inventory
8,000
Purchases
15,000
12,400
Purchases
Finished goods
beginning inventory
Cost of goods
manufactured
254,200
679,200
Cost of sales =
760,000
173,400
Finished goods
ending inventory
Finished goods
ending inventory
Finished goods
ending inventory
Direct
material used
Direct
labour
Manufacturing
overhead
Total
manufacturing costs
Direct
material used
173,000
240,000
679,600
Direct
material used
266,600*
*Also can be found from the Raw-Material Inventory account: 24,600 + 262,000 = 20,000 + direct
material used. Direct material used = $266,600
d.
e.
f.
Material beginning
inventory
Purchases
Material
used
Material
ending inventory
45,000
248,400
234,200
Material
ending inventory
59,200
Material
ending inventory
Work in process
beginning inventory
Total manufacturing
costs
Cost of goods
manufactured
Work in process
ending inventory
Work in process
beginning inventory
1,526,800
1,518,220
85,200
Work in process
beginning inventory
76,620
g.
Direct material
used
Direct
labour
Manufacturing
overhead
Total
manufacturing costs
234,200
Direct
labour
430,600
1,526,800
Direct
labour
862,000
Although not required in the problem, some instructors may require the companies Statements of
Cost of Sales, which we include here. (Note: Superscript letters cross-reference to missing amounts
in the problem.)
Company 1
Work in process, January 1 ........................
12,560
Manufacturing costs:
Direct material:
Raw material inventory, January 1 .....
Raw material purchased .....................
Raw material available for use ........
Less material inventory, December 31
8,000
19,400(a)
27,400
12,400
15,000
Direct labour...........................................
23,200
Manufacturing overhead........................
19,800
58,000
70,560
12,560
58,000
2,800
60,800
4,600
56,200
Company 2
Work in process, January 1 ........................
11,600
Manufacturing costs:
Direct material:
Raw material inventory, January 1 ..... 24,600
20,000
31
Direct material used ........................
266,600(c)
Direct labour...........................................
173,000
Manufacturing overhead........................
240,000
679,600
691,200
12,000
679,200
254,200
933,400
173,400(b)
760,000
2.32
(Continued)
Company 3
76,620(e)
Manufacturing costs:
Direct material:
Raw-material inventory, January 1 ............................ 45,000
Raw material purchased ............................................ 248,400
Raw material available for use ............................... 293,400
Less raw-material inventory, December 31 ...........
Direct material used ...............................................
59,200(d)
234,200
Direct labour..................................................................
862,000(g)
Manufacturing overhead...............................................
430,600
1,526,800
1,603,420
85,200
1,518,220
334,480
1,852,700
367,400
1,485,300(f)