Professional Documents
Culture Documents
page 38
SLLT
SLLT
page 39
SLLT
Research Method
Participants
There are 360 English teachers who were native speakers of
Thai and working at Thai public universities that offered Internet
access to students. These teachers were randomized to participate in
this study. In total, 180 participants were selected.
SLLT
page 41
Distribution of Questionnaires
A letter asking for co-operation was attached to a cover of the
questionnaire and was sent to the participants. The return
questionnaires totaled 120 out of 180 (66.67%).
Instrument
The survey instrument included items constructed primarily
from CMC literature. These items were developed by using Griffees
guidelines (Griffee, 2002). The Cronbach alpha-coefficient was used
to determine the reliability of the questionnaire, and it was 0.95.
Analysis of Data and Statistical Procedures
The selected questionnaires which had internal consistency
were coded and computed by using the SPSS program. Frequency
distribution and percentage were used as statistical devices.
Findings
Finding One
Table 1.1 summarized the participants demographic
information. Most of them were between 2545 year of ages; and
most of them (78%) were female. As for formal education,
respondents were almost entirely divided between those whose highest
level of attainment was the Ph.D. (23.3%) and those who held a
masters degree (64.4%).
Table 1.1 Demographic Data of the Respondents
Demographic Data of the respondents
Gender
Age
Highest Degree
page 42
Male
Female
Total
<25
25-35
36-45
>45
Total
Bachelor.
Masters
Doctoral
Total
Frequency
42
78
120
6
41
41
32
120
10
82
28
120
Percent
35.0
65.0
100.0
5.0
34.2
34.2
26.6
100.0
8.3
68.4
23.3
100.0
SLLT
Frequency
10
Percent
8.3
38
31.7
72
60.0
120
100.0
N=120
Frequency
Percent
1
34
1.4
47.2
15
22
72
20.8
30.6
100.0
page 43
Finding Three
The purposes of using CMC on the Internet are presented in
Table 3. These teaching purposes include: (a) analyzing the students
needs, (b) classroom communication between teachers and students,
(c) planning and presenting instruction, (d) practicing English
language skills, and (e) evaluating and assessing students
performance. The result revealed that most English teachers (78.8%)
used the Internet for instructional planning, while a small number of
teachers used the Internet for need analysis (5.8%). Nearly 60% of the
English teachers use the Internet to practice students English skills.
One fifth of the English teachers used the Internet for classroom
communication between teachers and students and for presenting
instruction. About half of the English teachers stated that they would
use the Internet to present the purposes of teaching.
not used 10
Using e-mail use later 35
for teaching use now 65
N = 110
Total
110
9.1
Frequency 6
31.8 Level of using Percent
9.2
59.1 email for
N = 65
100.0 teaching
not used 74
Using
use later 26
computer
use now 9
conference for Total
109
teaching
N = 109
not used 32
Class web
use later 59
page use for
teaching
N = 109
use now 18
Total
109
not used 52
Chat room use use later 32
N = 108
use now 24
Total
108
not used 69
Internet phone use later 35
use
use now 4
N = 108
Total
108
67.9
23.8
8.3
100.0
page 44
Total
7> times/term
5-6 times/term
3-4 times/term
1-2 times/term
A. Types of CMC
Teachers use for English
teaching
Frequency
16
13
30
65
24.6 20.0 46.2 100.0
29.4
54.1 Level of using
class web
page for
teaching
16.5
100.0
48.2
29.6 Level of using
22.2 chat room for
100.0 teaching
63.9
32.4 Level of using
3.7 Internet phone
for teaching
100.0
Frequency 1
Percent
5.6
4
1
22.2 5.6
12
18
66.6 100.0
N = 18
Frequency 10
5
3
6
24
Percent
41.7 20.8 12.5 25.0 100.0
N = 24
Frequency 3
1
0
Percent
75.0 25.0 0
N=4
0
0
4
100.0
SLLT
Frequency
43
55
6
104
27
62
21
110
Percent %
41.3
52.9
5.8
100.0
24.5
56.4
19.1
100.0
8
14
82
104
29
60
21
110
13
7.7
13.5
78.8
100.0
26.4
54.5
19.1
100.0
11.8
use now
Total
33
64
110
30.0
58.2
100.0
not use
may use later
use now
Total
not use
37
45
28
110
39
33.6
40.9
25.5
100.0
35.5
57
14
110
51.8
12.7
100.0
not used
may use later
use now
Total
not used
may use later
use now
Total
not used
may use later
use now
N=140
Total
not used
Used for teaching presentation may use later
use now
N=110
Total
not used
Used for student's skill practice may use later
Used for instruction planning
N=110
Used for students evaluation
N=110
Used for course evaluation
N=110
Discussion
Discussion for Finding One
About 50% of the participants were female and they used the
Internet to facilitate their teaching. Research on using the Internet for
ELT by Thai female teachers may be conducted to obtain problems,
difficulties, and obstacles. Then, particular help and support can be
provided.
Most participants realized the benefit of the Internet for ELT.
Only ten (8.3%) out of 120 teachers had no interest in using the
SLLT
page 45
Internet for their teaching. They mentioned several reasons in an openended answer in the questionnaire. For instance, they were too old to
keep up with technology. Some were afraid of being replaced by
technology. Therefore, they were not willing to use it as they did not
want to lose their positions. Some teachers believed that textbooks
could serve their teaching perfectly, hence, the Internet was not
necessary. Some mentioned that it was a waste of time and money for
the Thai government to spend on this issue and they did not want to
join in. Some refused to use the Internet because it was "too
complex". It may be concluded that some English teachers have
negative attitudes towards using the Internet for ELT. This result
concurred with the concept of Fizler (1995) and Warschauer (1996a).
They suggested that teacher's attitude and effort play the first part in
adopting technology to their teaching. Hence, the effort to support a
positive attitude toward the use of technology and to promote clearer
understanding for the new role of teachers in the new paradigm of
education should be emphasized. Without teachers guidance and
effort to design learner-centered activities, computers will do little to
help students learn English. It is accepted that teaching will be far
more effective with the use of technology. However, this does not
mean that teachers will be replaced by technology. Teachers should
use technology to facilitate teaching and the learning process in order
to achieve the goal of the new paradigm of education (Berge &
Collins, 1995).
Surprisingly, only one teacher stated that she used the Internet
for ELT in distance teaching. Even though there is evidence of
distance learning classes on the Ministry of University Affairs web
sites (http://www.uninet.th), not many teachers have used it. However,
more than 60% of English teachers currently used technology to
improve their teaching. Though various factors caused obstacles for
some teachers, many teachers planned to use the Internet. They
intended to create web pages for teaching online.
Discussion for Finding Two
The result of this study revealed that English teachers use many
types of CMC for teaching. E-mail was currently used most. This
replicated the study of Frizler (1995) and Warschauer (1996a). Both
suggested that e-mail was a great type of CMC in ELT. It was not
only a means to facilitate classroom lessons (giving and sending
assignments or communicating among participants), but it also was
used as a language learning tool to serve teaching purposes.
page 46
SLLT
The result of this study also showed that teachers use e-mail
frequently (more than seven times a semester). Singhal (1997) and
Kumari (1998) suggested that teachers participation in CMC is very
important for effective teaching with technology. Teachers should
coordinate and interact with learners (Frizler, 1995; Warschauer,
1996b; McCabe, 1998).
Discussion for Finding Three
The result of this study showed that English teachers used
CMC on the Internet for various teaching purposes. CMC can be used
for needs analysis, for interactive classes, for instructional planning,
for teaching presentations, for students skill practice, for students
evaluation and for course evaluation. The findings revealed that a
small number of English teachers used the Internet for both doing
needs analyses and course evaluation. Using the Internet for both
functions was complicated and difficult because developers needed to
have intermediate or advanced information skills (Riegle, 1996). The
teachers may not know how to use the Internet to serve these purposes
so they may employ other ways to analyze learners' needs and evaluate
their courses (Nunan & Lamb, 1996).
Although the current use of the Internet for analyzing the
students needs, for classroom communication between teachers and
students, and for evaluating and assessing students performance was
low, teachers intention to use the Internet for these purposes was high.
Teachers intended to do needs analyses to find out learner needs and
interests so that they could implement language courses that mostly
suited and satisfied learners preferences. The result suggested that
English teachers emphasized the learner-centred approach. It was
found that English teachers used the Internet mostly in the planning
phase. This study agrees with Frizler (1995), Warschauer (1996a),
Nunan and Lamb (1996), and Kumari (1998). Most teachers use the
Internet to plan their teaching and to provide practice opportunities for
the students.
Conclusion
More than half of the respondents said that they currently used
the Internet in their teaching. Most of them said that they used the
Internet in the classroom setting only. Many teachers planned to use a
class web page in their teaching. Thai teachers hardly used the Internet
to analyze students needs while many use the Internet to plan their
SLLT
page 47
teaching. More than half of the participants stated that they use the
Internet to serve the following teaching purposes: for classroom
communication between teachers and students, for teaching online, for
analyzing the students needs, and for evaluating and assessing the
students performance.
Recommendations for Further Studies
1. Research on the factors to organize online courses should be
conducted.
2. Classroom research on how well the Internet aids in discrete
language skills should be conducted.
3. Comparative studies on finding effective ways to use CMC should
be conducted in future research.
4. Discourse analyses on the Internet should be done to investigate
how language differs, and how that affects communicative
competence.
5. Research to identify key problems that occur often should be
conducted.
6. Training in computer skills is necessary. In tandem, there should
be a study to investigate pedagogical principles of Internet use and
how to best apply it.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to sincerely thank Dr. Saiwaroon
Chumpawan and Mr. Jacques Paulin for their valuable suggestions.
References
Colburn, M. (1998). Online strategic interaction: ESL role-playing via
Internet relay chat. The Internet TESL Journal, 4(6). Retrived
May 10, 2001, from http://www.aitech.ac.jp/~ites/j
Griffee, T., D. (2002). Questionnaire Construction and Classroom
Research. March 6, 2002, from http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/
jalt/pub/tlt/99/jan/griffee.html
Frizler, K. (1995). Frizzy University Network (FUN) Home Page.
Available : http://thecity.sfsu.edu/~funweb
Frizler, K. (1995). The Internet as an educational tool in ESOL writing
instruction. Unpublished masters thesis, San Francisco State
page 48
SLLT
page 49
SLLT