You are on page 1of 81

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Design of Barrage
Input Design Data
Maximum Discharge, Q max
Minimum Discharge, Qmin
River Bed Level, RBL
High Flood Level, HFL
Lowest water level, LWL
Numbers of canals on left side
Numbers of canals on right side
Maximum Discharge of one Canal
Slope of river
Lacey's Looseness Coefficient, LLC
1- Minimum Stable Wetted Perimeter
Wetted perimeter, Pw = 2.67 Qmax
Width between abutment, Wa = LLC x Pw
Number of bays
Bay width
Number of fish ladder
Width of one fish ladder
Number of divide walls
Width of on divide wall
width of one pier
Total number of piers
Total width of bays
Total width of piers
Width between abutment, Wa

500000 cusecs
12000 cusecs
582 ft
600 ft
587 ft
1
2
3500 cusecs
1 ft/mile
1.8

1888 ft
3398 ft
50
60 ft
1
26 ft
2
15 ft
7 ft
47
3000 ft
329 ft
3385 ft
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Discharge between abutments, qabt


Discharge over weir, q weir
2- Calculation of Lacey's Silt Factor
S = (1/1844) x f**5/3 / Q**1/6
Lacey's silt factor, f
3- Fixation of Crest Level
Afflux
Height of crest above river bed, P
Scour depth, R = 0.9(qabt**2 / f)**1/3
Depth of water above crest, Ho = R- P
Approach velocity, Vo = qabt / R
Energy head, ho = Vo**2 / 2g
Eo = Ho + ho
Do = HFL - RBL
E1 = Do + ho + Afflux
Level of E1 = RBL + E1
Crest level = Level of E1 - Eo
Maximum d/s water level
h = d/s WL - Crest Level
Using Gibson Curve
h / Eo
C' / C
C
C' = (C'/C) x C
Q = C' x W clear x Eo**3/2

Hydraulic Structures

147.71 cusecs/ft
166.67 cusecs/ft

2.04

3 ft
6 ft
19.82 ft
13.82 ft
7.45 ft/s
0.86 ft
14.69 ft
18.00 ft
21.86 ft
603.86 ft
589.18 ft
600 ft
10.82 ft
0.74
0.84
3.8 fps
3.19
538948 cusecs

O.K

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

4- Design of Undersluices
Difference between undersluices & main weir
Number of undersluices (N1)
Number of bays for one undersluices (N2)
Flow through undesluices as % of main weir
Crest level of undersluices
b1 = N1 x Bay width
qus = % flow x q weir
Scour depth, R = 0.9(qus**2 / f)**1/3
Do, (may be Do = R)
Approach velocity, Vo = qus / R
Energy head, ho = Vo**2 / 2g
Maximum U/S E.L = HFL + Afflux + ho
Eo = U/S E.L - Crest Level
h = (U/S E.L - Afflux) - Crest level
h / Eo
Using Gibson Curve
C' / C
C' = (C'/C) x C
Q1 & Q3,

( Q = C' x Wclear x Eo**3/2)

Q main weir = C' x (Wclear(bays) - Wclear( us) )x Eo**3/2

Total Discharge = Q1 + Q3 + Q main weir


%water through undersluices=(Q1+Q3)/Qmain weir*100

Hence
Crest Level of Undersluices
Number of Bays on Each Side

3 ft
2
5
120 %
586.18 ft
300 ft
200 cusecs/ft
24.26 ft
24.26 ft
8.24 ft/sec
1.06 ft
604.06 ft
17.88 ft
14.88 ft
0.83
0.76
2.89
131000 cusecs
431158 cusecs
562158 cusecs
30.4 %

O.K
1

586.18 ft
5

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

5- Determination of Water Levels and Energy Levels


5.1 Check for main weir
Q
(cusecs)

DSWL
(ft)

For normal state


600000
601.5
500000
600
250000
597
125000
592

USWL
(ft)

ho

Ho

Eo

(USWL-RBL)

Vo
qclear/D

h/Eo

(Vo**2/2g)

(DSWL-CL)

(USWL-CL)

(USWL+ho-CL)

(ft)

(ft/s)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

C'/C

C'

qclear

(cusecs/ft)

(cusecs)

(Gibson)

604.0
602.5
598.5
594.5

22.0
20.5
16.5
12.5

9.1
8.1
5.1
3.3

1.28
1.03
0.396
0.17

12.32
10.82
7.82
2.82

14.82
13.32
9.32
5.32

16.11
14.35
9.72
5.50

0.765
0.754
0.805
0.514

0.820
0.815
0.780
0.940

3.12
3.10
2.96
3.57

201.4 604304.51
168.4 505080.27
89.8 269469.2
46.0 138093.92

For retrogressed state


600000
595.5 602.0
500000
596 601.0
250000
591 597.0

20.0
19.0
15.0

10.0
8.8
5.6

1.55
1.19
0.48

6.32
6.82
1.82

12.82
11.82
7.82

14.38
13.02
8.30

0.440
0.524
0.220

0.960
0.930
0.970

3.65
3.53
3.69

198.9 596585.232 NOT O.K


166.0 498022.699 NOT O.K
88.2 264578.81
O.K

For accreted state


600000
604
500000
602.5
250000
601.5

24.0
22.0
20.0

8.3
7.6
4.2

1.08
0.89
0.27

14.82
13.32
12.32

16.82
14.82
12.82

17.90
15.72
13.09

0.828
0.848
0.941

0.765
0.740
0.520

2.91
2.81
1.98

220.2 660591.93
175.2 525555.63
93.6 280866.24

606.0
604.0
602.0

O.K
O.K
O.K
O.K

O.K
O.K
O.K

5.2 Check fo undersluices


Increase in flow
20 %
Concentration of flow, 157199 cusecs
Q

DSWL

USWL

Vo

ho

Ho

Eo

h/Eo

C'/C

C'

qclear

Q
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

(cusecs)

Hydraulic Structures

(ft)

(ft)

(USWL-RBL)

qclear/D

(Vo**2/2g)

(DSWL-CL)

(USWL-CL)

(USWL+ho-CL)

(ft)

(ft/s)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

For normal state


157199
601.5 603.5
For Retrogressed state
157199
595.5 601.5
For accreted state
157199
604.0 605.5

(Gibson)
(cusecs/ft)

(cusecs)

21.5

12.2

2.31

15.32

17.32

19.63

0.781

0.82

3.12

271.00 162602.65 Err:508

19.5

13.4

2.80

9.32

15.32

18.13

0.514

0.94

3.57

275.68 165409.02 Err:508

23.5

11.1

1.93

17.82

19.32

21.25

0.839

0.77

2.93

286.71 172025.03 Err:508

6- Fixation of d/s Floor Levels and Length of d/s Glacis and d/s Floor
6.1 Fixation of d/s floor levels for normal weir section using blench curves
Q
(cusecs)

qclear
(cusecs/ft)

hL

E2

(USWL+ho) (DSWL +ho)

(USEL-DSEL)

(blench curve) (DSEL - E2)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

USEL

DSEL
(ft)

Normal state of river


600000
201.4 605.28 602.78
500000
168.4 603.53 601.03
250000
89.8 598.90 597.40
For Retrogressed state of river
600000
198.9 603.55 597.05
500000
166.0 602.19 597.19
250000
88.2 597.48 591.48
For accreted state of river
600000
220.2 607.08 605.08
500000
175.2 604.89 603.39
250000
93.6 602.27 601.77

DSFL
(ft)

2.50
2.50
1.50

19.1
17.3
11.2

583.68
583.73
586.20

6.50
5.00
6.00

21
18.3
13

576.05
578.89
578.48

2.00
1.50
0.50

19.6
16.6
10.4

585.48
586.79
591.37
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Hence
d/s Floor level

576.00 ft

6.2 Fixation of d/s floor levels for undersluices using blench curves
Q
(cusecs)

qclear
(cusecs/ft)

hL

E2

(USWL+ho) (DSWL +ho)

(USEL-DSEL)

(blench curve) (DSEL - E2)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

USEL

DSEL
(ft)

Normal state of river


162603
271.00 605.81 603.81
For Retrogressed state of river
165409
275.68 604.30 598.30
For accreted state of river
172025
286.71 607.43 605.93
Hence
d/s Floor level for underslu 573.00 ft

DSFL
(ft)

2.00

22.3

581.51

6.00

25.1

573.20

1.50

22.6

583.33

7- Fixation of d/s floor level for normal barrage section using


Crump's method and determination of floor length
Q
Maximum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Max. DSWL - DSFL)

500000 cusecs
602.5 ft
604.0 ft
604.89 ft
576.00 ft
582 ft
589.18 ft
26.5 ft
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)

5.57 ft/sec

d/s velocity head (V2/2g)


DSEL (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)

0.48 ft
602.98 ft
15.71 ft
1.91 ft
166.67 cusecs/ft

Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3


L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)

9.52 ft
0.20
1.92
2.56
586.61 ft

Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )


Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

16.37 ft
10.61 ft
1: 3
31.84 ft
73.66 ft
41.83 ft
42 ft

L
K
y
F

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Fig:1 Various Parameters for using Crump's


Curve

b)
Q
Minimum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Min. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)
d/s velocity head (V2/2g)
DSEL, (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)
Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3
L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)
Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )
Slope of d/s glacis

500000 cusecs
596 ft
601 ft
602.19 ft
576 ft
582 ft
589.18 ft
20 ft
7.39 ft/sec
0.85 ft
596.85 ft
13.01 ft
5.34 ft
166.67 cusecs/ft
9.52 ft
0.56
2.48
10.59 ft
578.58 ft
18.27 ft
2.58 ft
1: 3
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)


Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

7.74 ft

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

82.19 ft
74.45 ft
75.00 ft

8 - Fixation of d/s floor length for undersluices


a)
Q
Maximum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Max. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)
d/s velocity head (V2/2g)
DSEL (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)
Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3
L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)

157199 cusecs
604 ft
605.5 ft
607.43 ft
573 ft
582 ft
586.18 ft
31 ft
8.5 ft/sec
1.11 ft
605.11 ft
21.25 ft
2.32 ft
262.0 cusecs/ft
12.87 ft
0.180
1.92
3.46 ft
582.72 ft
22.39 ft
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )


Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

9.72 ft
1: 3
29.16 ft
101 ft
71.60 ft
72.00 ft

b)
Q
Minimum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Min. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)
d/s velocity head (V2/2g)
DSEL (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)
Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3
L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)

157199 cusecs
595.5 ft
601.5 ft
604.3 ft
573 ft
582 ft
586.18 ft
22.5 ft
11.64 ft/sec
2.11 ft
597.61 ft
18.12 ft
6.69 ft
262.0 cusecs/ft
12.87 ft
0.520
2.32
11.73 ft
574.44 ft
23.16 ft
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )


Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

Hence we shall provide d/s floor length =

1.44 ft
1: 3
4.32 ft
104 ft
99.91 ft
100 ft

100 ft

9- Check for Adequacy for d/s floor levels using conjugate depth method.
9.1 For normal weir section

1.00
576.00 ft

Floor level of stilling pool


Discharge in river, Q (cusecs)
Discharge through main weir, Q1= 0.8Q (cusecs)
USEL (ft)
DSWL (ft)
E = USEL - DSFL
Intensity of flow on d/s floor, q = Q1/width of main weir

500000

250000

400000
200000
max.
min.
max
min
604.89 602.19 602.27 597.48
602.5
596.0
601.5
591
28.89
26.19
26.27 21.48
166.67 166.67

83.33

83.33

Depth in stilling pool, Dpool = DSWL - DSFL

26.50

20.00

25.50

15.00

f(z) = q/E3/2

1.073
0.145
0.635

1.243
0.170
0.671

0.619
0.080
0.504

0.837
0.110
0.573

Conjugate depth coefficients

z
z'

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Conjugate depths

Hydraulic Structures

d1 = z x E
d2 = z' x E

4.19

4.45

2.10

2.36

18.36

17.57

13.24

12.31

8.14

2.43

Jump submergency = Dpool - d2


Remarks

O.K

O.K

12.26
2.69
O.K
O.K

9.2 For undersluices section

1.00
573.00 ft

Floor level of stilling pool


Discharge in river, Q (cusecs)
Discharge through U.S with 20% concentration, (1.2 x (Q1 + Q2))
USEL (ft)
DSWL (ft)
E = USEL - DSFL (ft)
Intensity of flow on d/s floor, q = Q1/Total width of all U/S

500000
157199
Max.
Min.
607.43 604.30
604.00
595.5
34.43
31.30
262

262

Depth in stilling pool, Dpool = DSWL - DSFL

31.00

22.50

f(z) = q/E3/2

1.30
0.180
0.684

1.50
0.217
0.695

6.20

6.79

23.54

21.75

7.46

0.75

Conjugate depth coefficients


Conjugate depths

z
z'
d1 = z x E
d2 = z' x E

Jump submergency = Dpool - d2 (ft)


Remarks

O.K

O.K

10 - Scour Protection
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

For main weir


Assume flow concentration
q = Qmax /(total width of bays) x 1.2

20 %
200 cusecs/ft

R = 0.9 (q2/f)1/3

24.26 ft

10.1 - d/s scour protection for main weir


Safety factor for d/s floor critical condition
Depth, R' = safety factor x R
Minimum DSWL for Qmax
d/s appron (floor) level, (DSFL)
Depth of water on apron (Min DSWL - DSFL)
Increase in depth due to concentration
Depth of water with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.75
42.46 ft
596 ft
576.00 ft
20.00 ft
0.50 ft
20.50 ft
21.96 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')69.44 ft


Length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
50 ft
MIN. W.L

D
'R

)R-D(2.5
Bed Level

DSFL

1:3
t

Deepest Possible Scour


Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

t
R-(3
)D Scour
Fig:2

Deepest Possible Scour

Protection

10.2 U/s Scour Protection for main weir


Safety factor for u/s floor critical condition
R' = Safety factor x R
Minimum USWL for Qmax
U/s apron level, (RBL)
Depth of water on apron = USWL -RBL
Increase in depth due to concentration
Total depth with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.25
30.33 ft
601.00 ft
582 ft
19.00 ft
0.50 ft
19.50 ft
10.83 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')34.24 ft


Length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
25 ft
For undersluices
Assume flow concentration
q = (Q1+Q3)/Total width of undersluicesx 1.2
R = 0.9 (q2/f)1/3

20 %
262 cusecs/ft
29.05 ft

10.3 - d/s scour protection for undersluices


Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Safety factor for d/s floor critical condition


Depth, R' = safety factor x R
Minimum DSWL for Q1 + Q3
d/s appron (floor) level, (DSFL)
Depth of water on apron (Min DSWL - DSFL)
Increase in depth due to concentration
Depth of water with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

Hydraulic Structures

1.75
50.83 ft
595.5 ft
573.00 ft
22.50 ft
0.5 ft
23.00 ft
27.83 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')88.02 ft


Length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
63 ft
10.4 U/s Scour Protection for undersluices
Safety factor for u/s floor critical condition
R' = Safety factor x R
Minimum USWL for Q1 + Q3
U/s apron level, (RBL)
Depth of water on apron = USWL -RBL
Increase in depth due to concentration
Total depth with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.25
36.31 ft
601.5 ft
582 ft
19.5 ft
0.5 ft
20 ft
16.31 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')51.58 ft


Length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
37 ft
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

10.5 - Thickness of Aprons


The following table gives the required valuves of "t" (Fig:2) for protection
of various grades of sand and slope of rivers.
Fall in inches/mile
Sand classification
Very coarse
Coarse
Medium
Fine
Very fine

3
9
Thickness of stone
16
19
22
25
28
31
34
37
40
43

12
18
pitching in inches
22
25
28
31
34
37
40
43
45
49

24
28
34
40
46
52

Type of soil
Medium sand
Slope of river
12 in/mile
Thickness if stone pitching, t
34 in
Thickness of stone apron in horizontal position = 1.75xt/slope
5 ft
Size of concrete blocks over filter
4 ft cube
Summary
Total Length of d/s stone apron
50 ft
4 ft Thick bloke apron = 1/3 x total length
16 ft (block= 4'x4'x4')
5 ft Thick stone apron
34 ft
Total length of u/s apron
4 ft Thick bloke apron = 1/3 x total length
5 ft Thick stone apron

25 ft
8 ft (block= 4'x4'x4')
17 ft

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

11 - Inverted Filter Design


Size of Concrete blocks
Thickness of shingle (3' - 6")
Thickness of coarse shingle (3/4" - 3")
Thickness of fine shingle (3/16" - 3/4")
Spacing b/w conc. Blocks filled with fine shingle

Spacing /Jhries (2")

4 ft cube
9 in
9 in
6 in
2 in

Concrete Blocks
')x4'x4'4(

"9

Gravel

Coarse sand" 9
Sand" 6

Fig: 3 Inverted Filter

12- Design of guide banks

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

i)

Length of each guid bank measured in straight line along


the barrage u/s , Lu/s = 1.5 x Wa

ii)

Length of each guid bank d/s of barrage, Ld/s = 0.2 x Wa

iii)

For the nose of the u/s guide bank and the full length of d/s
guide bank use Lacey's depth = 1.75 x R
For remaining u/s guide bank lacey's depth = 1.25 x R
Possible slope of scour
Free board u/s
Free board d/s

iv)
v)

Hydraulic Structures

5078 ft
677 ft

42.46 ft
30.33 ft
1: 3
7 ft above HFL
6 ft above HFL

These free boards also include allowance for accretion.

vi) Top of guide bank


vii) Side slope of guide bank
viii) Minimum apron thickness

10 ft
1: 3
4 ft

Length of barrage, Wa
Length of u/s guide bank
Length of d/s guide bank
Radius of u/s curved part
Radius of d/s curved part

3385 ft
5078 ft
677 ft
600 ft
400 ft

Maximum u/s angle protected

140o

Maximum d/s angle protected

57o - 80o

12.1 Determination of levels of guide banks


Merrimen's backwater formula

1 C 2 d1
d1 d 2
d

L
D
2
S
g D
D
S
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

1 C 2 d1
d1 d 2
d

L
D
2
S
g D
D
S

L = length of back water curve

d2

d1

L
Bresse Backwater Function

Chezy's Coefficient, C
Bed slope of river, S
RBL
D/s HFL with accretion
D = D/s HFL with accretion - RBL
U/s HFL with accretion
d1 = U/s HFL with accretion - RBL

71 ( max for earthen channels)


1/ 5000
582 ft
602.5 ft
20.5 ft
604.0 ft

Assume d2 (in between d1 and D)

21.78 ft

d1/D

1.073

d2/D

1.062

(d1/D)

22.0 ft

0.7870

(from Bresse back water function table)

(d2/D)
L
Length of guide bank
Comments

0.8287
5240 ft
5078
O.K
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Rise in RBL = Length of guide bank / slope


Water level along h/w axis at 5078 ft u/s of barrage
= RBL + Rise in RBL + d2

1.02 from barrage level


604.80 ft

i) Level at the nose of u/s guide bank = W/L + free board


ii) Level at the barrage = HFL + free board
iii) Water level d/s of barrage
D/s free board
Level of guide bank d/s = W/L + Free board

611.80 ft
607 ft
602.5 ft
6 ft
608.5 ft

13 - Design of Guide Bank Apron


W.L
D

')R' - D (2.5
T=1.07
t

T
R

3: 1

Deepest Possible Scour


t

Working on same lines as in section 10,


Length of unlanched horizontal apron = 2.5(R' - D')

27.07 ft
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Length of launched apron at 1:3 slope = 3.16(R' - D')


Thickness of stone apron, t (as calculated previously)
say
Volume of stones in apron = t x length launched apron
Minimum thickness of unlaunched apron = 1.07t
Mean thickness of unlaunched apron = volume/ 2.5(R' - D')
Maximum thickness of unlaunched apron = 2tmean - tmin

34.22 ft
34 inches
3 ft
102.65 ft3/unit width
3.2 ft
3.8 ft
5.0 ft

14 - Design of Marginal Bunds


i) Top width
ii) Top level above estimated HFL after allowing 1.5ft accretion
iii) Front slope of marginal bunds (not pitched)
iv) Back slope to be such as to provide minimum cover of 2 ft,
over hydraulic gradient of 1:6
v) U/s water level at nose of guide bank
Free board of marginal bund
Hence level of marginal bund

20 ft
5 ft
1: 3

611.80 ft
5 ft
616.80 ft

Calculation of length of backwater curve:


Merrimen's equation can be used to calculate backwater length

1 C2
d1 d 2

L
D
S
g
S

d1
d
2
D
D

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

d2

d1

L
Bresse Backwater Function

Maximum USWL at Qmax

604.0 ft
582 ft
600 ft

RBL
Normal W.L without weir
d1 = Maximum USWL - RBL
D = Normal W.L - RBL
Slope
Table for length of backwater curve
1 C2
d1 d 2
d1
d2
D

S
g
S
1

18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18

22.0
21.5
21.0
20.5
20.0
19.5
19.0
18.5

21.5
21.0
20.5
20.0
19.5
19.0
18.5
18.1

2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2000

4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4

22.0 ft
18 ft
1: 5000

T1

d1
D

1.222
1.194
1.167
1.139
1.111
1.083
1.056
1.028

T2

d2
D

1.194
1.167
1.139
1.111
1.083
1.056
1.028
1.006

d1

0.3162
0.3397
0.3636
0.3908
0.4198
0.457
0.4993
0.5511

d2
(5)x(10)
L
2 1
x(1) =(11)+(4)
D

0.3397
0.3636
0.3908
0.4198
0.457
0.4993
0.5511
0.6207

10

11

0.0235
0.0239
0.0272
0.029
0.0372
0.0423
0.0518
0.0696

2049
2084
2371
2528
3243
3688
4516
6068
Total

12

4549
4584
4871
5028
5743
6188
7016
8068
46047 ft
8.73 miles
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Hence length of backwater cure = 8.73 miles

Part II
Design of barrage profile for sub surface flow condition
15 - Fixing of Depth of Sheet Piles
Scour depth, R
Depth of u/s sheet pile from HFL = 1.5 R
Max. USWL for Qmax

19.82 ft
30 ft

RL of bottomo fu/s sheet pile = Max. USWL - 1.5R


Depth of d/s sheet pile below HFL = 2R
RL of bottom of intermediate sheet pile = Max. USWL - 2R
Let RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile

604.0 ft
574.0 ft
40 ft
564.0 ft
550 ft

604.0 ft

589.18 ft

582.0

1: 4

1: 3

576.00
B

574.0

75.00
M

564.0
1.5H = 48

28.70

39.53

550.0
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

16 - Calculation of Exit Gradient

GE

H
1
x
d

b
E

b1

d
D

= b/d
Parmeters of Khosla's Curve

Let the water be headed up to Max. accreted level u/s


and no flow d/s.
Retogression
DSFL

604.0 ft

= b/d

7.59
0.152

4 ft
576.0 ft
32.0 ft
Differential head causing seepeage, H = Max. u/s WL - (DSFL - Retrogression)
Depth of d/s sheet pile, d = DSFL - RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile
26.0 ft
Total length of concrete floor = b
197.23 ft
1
1 form ~

curve

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

GE

0.187 SAFE

17 - Calculation of Uplift Pressure After Applying Correction


17.1 U/s pile line:
Length of concrete floor upto u/s sheet pile, b1

48 ft
197.23 ft
8.0 ft

Total length of concrete floor, b


Depth of u/s sheet pile,d
Assume tf u/s floor thickness

2.5 ft
0.0406
24.65

1/ = d/b
= b/d
b1/b

0.243

1 - b1/b
B = D From khosla's curve
A = E From khosla's curve
K = c From khosla's curve

0.757
67 %
69 %
64 %

100 - 33
100 - 31

i) Correction for floor thickness


Correction in

Correction in

tf
d
tf
d

B K

0.938 %

A B

-ve

0.625 %

ii) Correction for interface of sheet pile


Correction in

d D

due to second pile =19

D
b'
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Depth of u/s sheet pile,d


D = RBL - RL of bottom of second pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'
Correction in K

+ve

8.0 ft
18.0 ft
197.23 ft
74.23 ft
1.23 %

K
iii) Slope correction for
Correction for K FS

bs
b1

For 1:4 slope, Fs (from slope correction curve)


3.3
Distance between two piles, b1
74.23 ft
Horizontal projection of u/s glacis, bs = (crest level - RBL) x 1/slope 28.70 ft
Correction for K
-1.28
Hence
Correted A
68.375 %
Corrected B
67 %
Corrected K
64.895 %
17.2 Intermediate sheet pile at toe of d/s glacis:
Assume floor thickness
DSFL
RL of intermediate sheet pile
d = DSFL - RL of Intermediate sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Length of concrete floor up to sheet pile, b1
b1/b

10 ft
576.00 ft
564.00 ft
12.00 ft
197.23 ft
122.23 ft
0.620
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

1 - b1/b
= b/d
L E From khosla's curve
M D From khosla's curve
N C From khosla's curve

100 - 55
100 - 58

0.380
16.44
45 %
42 %
36.5 %

i) Correction due to floor thickness


Correction in L
Correction in N

tf
d
tf
d

L M

-2.5 %

4.58 %

ii) Correction due to interference of pile


Correction in L due to u/s sheet pile19 d D
b

D
b'

Depth of Intermediate sheet pile,d


D = RBL - RL of bottom of u/s sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'
Correction in L = 19 d D
b

D
b'

12.0 ft
18.00 ft
197.23 ft
74.23 ft
-1.42 %

d D
b

Correction in N due to d/s sheet pile 19


=

Depth of Intermediate sheet pile,d


D = DSFL - RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'
N

d D

19

D
b'

D
b'

12.00 ft
26.00 ft
197.23 ft
75.00 ft

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

d D

Correction in N = 19

D
b'

2.16 %

L
iii) Slope correction for
for '1:3 slope, Fs

4.5

bs = (crest level - DSFL) x 1/slope

39.53 ft

Distance between two piles, b1

74.23 ft

Correction in L FS

bs
b1

2.40 %

Hence
Corrected L
Corrected M
Corrected N

43.47 %
42 %
43.24 %

17.3 D/s sheet pile at the end of impervious floor


Assume floor thickness
Depth of d/s sheet pile, d
Total length of concrete floor, b
1/ = d/b
P E From khosla's curve
Q D From khosla's curve
R C From khosla's curve

100 - 68
100 - 78

7 ft
26.00 ft
197.23 ft
0.132
32 %
22 %
0%

i) Correction due to floor thickness


Correction in P
R

-2.69 %
Muhammad Azhar Saleem
2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

P
Correction in R

5.92 %

ii) Correction due to interface of piles


Correction in P
Depth of d/s sheet pile,d
D = DSFL - RL of bottom of intermediate sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'

d D
Correction in P =19

D
b'

26.00 ft
12.00 ft
197.23 ft
75.00 ft
-1.46 %

Hence
Corrected P
Corrected Q
Corrected R

27.84 %
22 %
5.92 %

Table: Uplift pressure at E, D, C and along the sheet piles


Symbol used in
Khosla cueve

E
D
C

u/s Pile
line
A = 68.38%
B =
67%
K = 64.89%

Intermediate
Line
L =
43.47%
M =
42%
43.24%
N =

d/s Pile
Line
P = 27.84%
Q =
22%
R = 5.92%

18 - Calculation For Floor Thickness:


tf

H
100 G 1

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

tf

H
100 G 1

where
tf = Thickness of floor in ft

= % Uplift pressure

H = Maximum differential head causing seepage


G = Specific gravity of concrete

2.4

a) Thickness of floor at A
Assumend thickness
H
Thickness from uplift pressure
say

2.5 ft
32 ft
15.63 ft
16.00 ft

say

10 ft
9.94 ft
10.00 ft

say

10 ft
9.88 ft
10.00 ft

say

7 ft
6.36 ft
7.00 ft

b) Thickness of floor at L
Assumend thickness
Thickness from uplift pressure
c) Thickness of floor at N
Assumend thickness
Thickness from uplift pressure
d) Thickness of floor at P
Assumend thickness
Thickness from uplift pressure
e) Thickness of floor at crest

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage

Hydraulic Structures

Pressure at crest
y

K L
(x)
Uplift pressure at crest L
y
Hence
Thickness of floor at crest d/s of gate

54.88 %

say

12.544 ft
13 ft

Muhammad Azhar Saleem


2003/II-MS-C-STRU-01

Design of Barrage
Input Design Data
Maximum Discharge, Q max
Minimum Discharge, Qmin
River Bed Level, RBL
High Flood Level, HFL
Lowest water level, LWL
Numbers of canals on left side
Numbers of canals on right side
Maximum Discharge of one Canal
Slope of river
Lacey's Looseness Coefficient, LLC
1- Minimum Stable Wetted Perimeter
Wetted perimeter, Pw = 2.67 Qmax
Width between abutment, Wa = LLC x Pw
Number of bays
Bay width
Number of fish ladder
Width of one fish ladder
Number of divide walls
Width of one divide wall
width of one pier
Total number of piers
Total width of bays
Total width of piers
Width between abutment, Wa
Discharge between abutments, qabt
Discharge over weir, q weir
2- Calculation of Lacey's Silt Factor
S = (1/1844) x f**5/3 / Q**1/6
Lacey's silt factor, f
3- Fixation of Crest Level
Afflux
Height of crest above river bed, P
Scour depth, R = 0.9(qabt**2 / f)**1/3
Depth of water above crest, Ho = R- P
Approach velocity, Vo = qabt / R
Energy head, ho = Vo**2 / 2g
Eo = Ho + ho

540000 cusecs
12000 cusecs
582 ft
600 ft
587 ft
1
2
3500 cusecs
1 ft/mile
1.8

1962 ft
3532 ft
55
60 ft
1
25 ft
2
15 ft
7 ft
52
3300 ft
364 ft
3719 ft
145.20 cusecs/ft
163.64 cusecs/ft

2.06

3 ft
6 ft
19.55 ft
13.55 ft
7.43 ft/s
0.86 ft
14.41 ft

Do = HFL - RBL
E1 = Do + ho + Afflux
Level of E1 = RBL + E1
Crest level = Level of E1 - Eo
Maximum d/s water level
h = d/s WL - Crest Level
Using Gibson Curve
h / Eo
C' / C
C
C' = (C'/C) x C

18.00 ft
21.86 ft
603.86 ft
589.45 ft
600 ft
10.55 ft
0.73
0.86
3.8 fps
3.27

Q = C' x W clear x Eo**3/2

589630 cusecs
O.K

4- Design of Undersluices
Difference between undersluices & main weir
Number of undersluices (N1)
Number of bays for one undersluices (N2)
Flow through undesluices as % of main weir
Crest level of undersluices
b1 = N1 x Bay width
qus = % flow x q weir
Scour depth, R = 0.9(qus**2 / f)**1/3
Do, (may be Do = R)
Approach velocity, Vo = qus / R
Energy head, ho = Vo**2 / 2g
Maximum U/S E.L = HFL + Afflux + ho
Eo = U/S E.L - Crest Level
h = (U/S E.L - Afflux) - Crest level
h / Eo
Using Gibson Curve
C' / C
C' = (C'/C) x C
Q1 & Q3,

3 ft
2
5
120 %
586.45 ft
300 ft
196.364 cusecs/ft
23.91 ft
23.91 ft
8.21 ft/sec
1.05 ft
604.05 ft
17.60 ft
14.60 ft
0.83
0.77
2.93

( Q = C' x Wclear x Eo**3/2)

Q main weir = C' x (Wclear(bays) - Wclear( us) )x Eo**3/2

Total Discharge = Q1 + Q3 + Q main weir

O.K

%water through undersluices=(Q1+Q3)/Qmain weir*100

Hence
Crest Level of Undersluices
Number of Bays on Each Side
5- Determination of Water Levels and Energy Levels

129586 cusecs
482425 cusecs
612010 cusecs
26.9 %
586.45 ft
5

5.1 Check for main weir


Q
(cusecs)

DSWL
(ft)

USWL
(ft)

For normal state


648000
602
540000
600.5
270000
597.5
135000
593

ho

Ho

(USWL-RBL)

Vo
qclear/D

(Vo**2/2g)

(DSWL-CL)

(USWL-CL)

(ft)

(ft/s)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

604.5
603.0
598.5
594.5

22.5
21.0
16.5
12.5

8.7
7.8
5.0
3.3

1.18
0.94
0.382
0.17

12.55
11.05
8.05
3.55

15.05
13.55
9.05
5.05

For retrogressed state


648000
596 602.5
540000
596.5 601.5
270000
592 597.0

20.5
19.5
15.0

9.6
8.4
5.5

1.42
1.09
0.46

6.55
7.05
2.55

13.05
12.05
7.55

For accreted state


648000
604.5
540000
603
270000
602

23.5
22.0
20.5

8.4
7.4
4.0

1.08
0.86
0.25

15.05
13.55
12.55

16.05
14.55
13.05

605.5
604.0
602.5

5.2 Check for undersluices


Increase in flow
Concentration of flow,
Q
(cusecs)

DSWL
(ft)

20 %
### cusecs

USWL
(ft)

For normal state


155503
594 601.5
For Retrogressed state
155503
590
601
For accreted state
155503
598.0 602.5

ho

Ho

(USWL-RBL)

Vo
qclear/D

(Vo**2/2g)

(DSWL-CL)

(USWL-CL)

(ft)

(ft/s)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

19.5

13.3

2.74

7.55

15.05

19

13.6

2.89

3.55

14.55

20.5

12.6

2.48

11.55

16.05

6- Fixation of d/s Floor Levels and Length of d/s Glacis and d/s Floor
6.1 Fixation of d/s floor levels for normal weir section using blench curves
Q

qclear

USEL

DSEL

(USWL+ho) (DSWL +ho)

hL

E2

(USEL-DSEL)

(blench curve) (DSEL - E2)

DSFL

(cusecs)

(cusecs/ft)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

Normal state of river


648000
201.3 605.68 603.18
540000
170.8 603.94 601.44
270000
83.6 598.88 597.88
For Retrogressed state of river
648000
198.8 603.92 597.42
540000
168.4 602.59 597.59
270000
84.4 597.46 592.46
For accreted state of river
648000
196.7 606.58 605.58
540000
167.8 604.86 603.86
270000
86.6 602.75 602.25
Hence
d/s Floor level
### ft

(ft)

(ft)

2.50
2.50
1.00

18.6
17.6
10

584.58
583.84
587.88

6.50
5.00
5.00

20.8
17.3
12

576.62
580.29
580.46

1.00
1.00
0.50

17
15.4
10.5

588.58
588.46
591.75

6.2 Fixation of d/s floor levels for undersluices using blench curves
Q
(cusecs)

qclear
(cusecs/ft)

hL

E2

(USWL+ho) (DSWL +ho)

(USEL-DSEL)

(blench curve) (DSEL - E2)

(ft)

(ft)

(ft)

USEL

DSEL
(ft)

Normal state of river


157414
262.36 604.24 596.74
For Retrogressed state of river
156064
260.11 603.89 592.89
For accreted state of river
165503
275.84 604.98 600.48
Hence
566.00 ft
d/s Floor level for undersluices

DSFL
(ft)

7.50

27.5

569.24

11.00

26.5

566.39

4.50

28.4

572.08

7- Fixation of d/s floor level for normal barrage section using


Crump's method and determination of floor length
Q
Maximum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Max. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)
d/s velocity head (V2/2g)

540000 cusecs
603.00 ft
604.00 ft
604.86 ft
577.00 ft
582 ft
589.45 ft
26 ft
5.58 ft/sec
0.48 ft

DSEL (DSWL + velocity head)


K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)

603.48 ft
15.41 ft
1.38 ft
163.64 cusecs/ft

Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3


L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)

9.40 ft
0.15
1.92
2.65
586.80 ft

Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )


Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

16.68 ft
9.80 ft
1: 3
29.41 ft
75.06 ft
45.64 ft
46 ft

L
K
y
F

Fig:1 Various Parameters for using Crump's


Curve

b)
Q
Minimum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Min. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)
d/s velocity head (V2/2g)
DSEL, (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )

540000 cusecs
596.5 ft
601.5 ft
602.59 ft
577.00 ft
582 ft
589.45 ft
19.5 ft
7.45 ft/sec
0.86 ft
597.36 ft
13.14 ft

L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)

5.23 ft
163.64 cusecs/ft

Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3


L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)

9.40 ft
0.56
2.48
10.18 ft
579.27 ft
18.09 ft
2.27 ft
1: 3
6.81 ft

Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )


Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

81.42 ft
74.61 ft
75.00 ft

8 - Fixation of d/s floor length for undersluices


a)
Q
Maximum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Max. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)
d/s velocity head (V2/2g)
DSEL (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)
Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3
L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)
Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )
Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)

155503 cusecs
598 ft
602.5 ft
604.98 ft
566.00 ft
582 ft
586.45 ft
32 ft
8.1 ft/sec
1.02 ft
599.02 ft
18.53 ft
5.96 ft
259.2 cusecs/ft
12.78 ft
0.467
2.2
9.58 ft
576.87 ft
22.15 ft
10.87 ft
1: 3
32.61 ft

Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)


Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

100 ft
67.06 ft
68.00 ft

b)
Q
Minimum DSWL
USWL
USEL
DSFL
RBL
Crest level
Dpool (Min. DSWL - DSFL)
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa)

155503 cusecs
590 ft
601 ft
603.89 ft
566.00 ft
582 ft
586.45 ft
24 ft
10.80 ft/sec

d/s velocity head (V2/2g)


DSEL (DSWL + velocity head)
K (USEL - Crest Level )
L (USEL - DSEL )
q (Q / Total width of bays)

1.81 ft
591.81 ft
17.44 ft
12.08 ft
259.2 cusecs/ft

Critical Depth, C, (q2 / g)1/3


L/C
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve)
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K]
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F
E2, ( DSEL - Level of intersection of jump)

12.78 ft
0.945
2.9
19.62 ft
566.84 ft

Submergency of jump, (Level of intersection of jump - DSFL )


Slope of d/s glacis
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency)
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E2)
Length of d/s floor,

(Length of stilling pool -Length of glacis d/s of jump)

Say

Hence we shall provide d/s floor length =

24.97 ft
0.84 ft
1: 3
2.51 ft
112 ft
109.88 ft
110 ft

110 ft

9- Check for Adequacy for d/s floor levels using conjugate depth method.
9.1 For normal weir section

Floor level of stilling pool


Discharge in river, Q (cusecs)

1.00
577.00 ft
540000

Discharge through main weir, Q1= 0.8Q (cusecs)


USEL (ft)
DSWL (ft)
E = USEL - DSFL
Intensity of flow on d/s floor, q = Q1/width of main weir

432000
max.
min.
604.86 602.59
603
596.5
27.86
25.59
160.00 160.00

Depth in stilling pool, Dpool = DSWL - DSFL

26.00

19.50

f(z) = q/E3/2

1.088
0.150
0.643

1.236
0.170
0.671

4.18

4.35

17.92

17.17

8.08

2.33

Conjugate depth coefficients


Conjugate depths

z
z'
d1 = z x E
d2 = z' x E

Jump submergency = Dpool - d2


Remarks

O.K

O.K

9.2 For undersluices section

1.00
566.00

Floor level of stilling pool


Discharge in river, Q (cusecs)
Discharge through U.S with 20% concentration, (1.2 x (Q1 + Q2))
USEL (ft)
DSWL (ft)
E = USEL - DSFL (ft)
Intensity of flow on d/s floor, q = Q1/Total width of all U/S

540000
155503
Max.
604.98
598.00
38.98
259

Depth in stilling pool, Dpool = DSWL - DSFL

32.00

f(z) = q/E

1.06
0.145
0.635

3/2

Conjugate depth coefficients


Conjugate depths

z
z'
d1 = z x E

5.65

d2 = z' x E

24.75

Jump submergency = Dpool - d2 (ft)


Remarks

7.25
O.K

10 - Scour Protection
For main weir
Assume flow concentration
q = Qmax /(total width of bays) x 1.2
R = 0.9 (q2/f)1/3

20 %
196.364 cusecs/ft
23.91 ft

10.1 - d/s scour protection for main weir


Safety factor for d/s floor critical condition
Depth, R' = safety factor x R
Minimum DSWL for Qmax
d/s appron (floor) level, (DSFL)
Depth of water on apron (Min DSWL - DSFL)
Increase in depth due to concentration
Depth of water with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.75
41.84 ft
596.5 ft
577.00 ft
19.50 ft
0.50 ft
20.00 ft
21.84 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')69.05 ft


Length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
50 ft
MIN. W.L

D
'R

)R-D(2.5
Bed Level

DSFL

1:3
t
R-(3
)D Scour
Fig:2

Deepest Possible Scour

Protection

10.2 U/s Scour Protection for main weir


Safety factor for u/s floor critical condition
R' = Safety factor x R
Minimum USWL for Qmax
U/s apron level, (RBL)
Depth of water on apron = USWL -RBL
Increase in depth due to concentration
Total depth with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.25
29.88 ft
601.50 ft
582 ft
19.50 ft
0.50 ft
20.00 ft
9.88 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')31.25 ft


Length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position

= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)

23 ft

For undersluices
Assume flow concentration
q = (Q1+Q3)/Total width of undersluicesx 1.2
R = 0.9 (q2/f)1/3

20 %
259 cusecs/ft
28.76 ft

10.3 - d/s scour protection for undersluices


Safety factor for d/s floor critical condition
Depth, R' = safety factor x R
Minimum DSWL for Q1 + Q3
d/s appron (floor) level, (DSFL)
Depth of water on apron (Min DSWL - DSFL)
Increase in depth due to concentration
Depth of water with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.75
50.34 ft
590 ft
566.00 ft
24.00 ft
0.5 ft
24.50 ft
25.84 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')81.71 ft


Length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
59 ft
10.4 U/s Scour Protection for undersluices
Safety factor for u/s floor critical condition
R' = Safety factor x R
Minimum USWL for Q1 + Q3
U/s apron level, (RBL)
Depth of water on apron = USWL -RBL
Increase in depth due to concentration
Total depth with concentration, D'
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D'
Slope of protection

1.25
35.96 ft
601 ft
582 ft
19 ft
0.5 ft
19.5 ft
16.46 ft
1: 3

Length of apron to cover surface of scour = Sqrt (12+32)x(R'-D')52.04 ft


Length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t)
38 ft
10.5 - Thickness of Aprons
The following table gives the required valuves of "t" (Fig:2) for protection
of various grades of sand and slope of rivers.

Fall in inches/mile
Sand classification
Very coarse
Coarse
Medium
Fine
Very fine

3
9
12
18
Thickness of stone pitching in inches
16
19
22
25
22
25
28
31
28
31
34
37
34
37
40
43
40
43
45
49

24
28
34
40
46
52

Type of soil
Medium sand
Slope of river
12 in/mile
Thickness if stone pitching, t
34 in
Thickness of stone apron in horizontal position = 1.75xt/slo
5 ft
Size of concrete blocks over filter
4 ft cube
Summary
Total Length of d/s stone apron
50 ft
4 ft Thick bloke apron = 1/3 x total length
16 ft (block= 4'x4'x
5 ft Thick stone apron
34 ft
Total length of u/s apron
4 ft Thick bloke apron = 1/3 x total length
5 ft Thick stone apron

23 ft
7 ft (block= 4'x4'x
16 ft

11 - Inverted Filter Design


Size of Concrete blocks
Thickness of shingle (3' - 6")
Thickness of coarse shingle (3/4" - 3")
Thickness of fine shingle (3/16" - 3/4")
Spacing b/w conc. Blocks filled with fine shingle

Spacing /Jhries
(2")

4 ft cube
9 in
9 in
6 in
2 in

Concrete Bl
')x4'x

"9

Gr

Coarse san

San

"9

Gr

Coarse san

San

Fig: 3 Inverted
Filter

12- Design of guide banks


i) Length of each guid bank measured in straight line along
the barrage u/s , Lu/s = 1.5 x Wa

5579 ft

ii) Length of each guid bank d/s of barrage, Ld/s = 0.2 x Wa

743.8 ft

iii) For the nose of the u/s guide bank and the full length of d/s
guide bank use Lacey's depth = 1.75 x R
For remaining u/s guide bank lacey's depth = 1.25 x R
iv) Possible slope of scour
v) Free board u/s
Free board d/s

41.84 ft
29.88 ft
1: 3
7 ft above HFL
6 ft above HFL

These free boards also include allowance for accretion.

vi) Top of guide bank


vii) Side slope of guide bank
viii) Minimum apron thickness

10 ft
1: 3
4 ft

Length of barrage, Wa
Length of u/s guide bank
Length of d/s guide bank
Radius of u/s curved part
Radius of d/s curved part

3719 ft
5579 ft
743.8 ft
600 ft
400 ft

Maximum u/s angle protected

140o

Maximum d/s angle protected

57o - 80o

12.1 Determination of levels of guide banks


Merrimen's backwater formula

1 C2
d1 d 2
D
S
g
S

L = length of back water curve

d1

d
d
1 2
D
D

d2

d2

d1

L
Bresse Backwater
Function

Chezy's Coefficient, C
Bed slope of river, S
RBL
D/s HFL with accretion
D = D/s HFL with accretion - RBL
U/s HFL with accretion
d1 = U/s HFL with accretion - RBL

71 ( max for earthen chann


1/ 5000
582 ft
603 ft
21 ft
604.0 ft
22.0 ft

Assume d2 (in between d1 and D)

21.8 ft

d1/D

1.048

d2/D

1.038

(d1/D)

0.8999

(from Bresse back water function table)

(d2/D)
L
Length of guide bank
Comments

0.958
6909 ft
5579
O.K

Rise in RBL = Length of guide bank / slope


Water level along h/w axis at 5579 ft u/s of barrage
= RBL + Rise in RBL + d2

1.12 from barrage level


604.92 ft

i) Level at the nose of u/s guide bank = W/L + free board


ii) Level at the barrage = HFL + free board
iii) Water level d/s of barrage
D/s free board
Level of guide bank d/s = W/L + Free board

611.92 ft
607.5 ft
603.0 ft
6 ft
609.0 ft

13 - Design of Guide Bank Apron


W.L
D

')R' - D (2.5
T=1.07
t

T
3: 1

Deepest Possible Scour


t

Working on same lines as in section 10,


Length of unlanched horizontal apron = 2.5(R' - D')
Length of launched apron at 1:3 slope = 3.16(R' - D')
Thickness of stone apron, t (as calculated previously)
say

24.71 ft
31.23 ft
34 inches
3 ft

Volume of stones in apron = t x length launched apron


Minimum thickness of unlaunched apron = 1.07t
Mean thickness of unlaunched apron = volume/ 2.5(R' - D')
Maximum thickness of unlaunched apron = 2tmean - tmin

93.69 ft3/unit width


3.2 ft
3.8 ft
5.0 ft

14 - Design of Marginal Bunds


i) Top width
20 ft
ii) Top level above estimated HFL after allowing 1.5ft accretion
5 ft
iii) Front slope of marginal bunds (not pitched)
1: 3
iv) Back slope to be such as to provide minimum cover of 2 ft,
over hydraulic gradient of 1:6
v) U/s water level at nose of guide bank
611.92 ft
Free board of marginal bund
5 ft
Hence level of marginal bund
616.92 ft
Calculation of length of backwater curve:
Merrimen's equation can be used to calculate backwater length

1 C2
d1 d 2

D
S
g
S

d1
d
2
D
D

d2

d1

L
Bresse Backwater
Function

Bresse Backwater
Function

Maximum USWL at Qmax

604.0 ft
582 ft
600 ft

RBL
Normal W.L without weir
d1 = Maximum USWL - RBL
D = Normal W.L - RBL
Slope
Table for length of backwater curve
1 C2
d1 d 2
d1
d2
D

S
g
S
1

18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18

22.0
21.5
21.0
20.5
20.0
19.5
19.0
18.5

21.5
21.0
20.5
20.0
19.5
19.0
18.5
18.1

2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2000

4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4
4843.4

22.0 ft
18 ft
1: 5000

T1

d1
D

1.222
1.194
1.167
1.139
1.111
1.083
1.056
1.028

T2

d2
D

d1

1.194
1.167
1.139
1.111
1.083
1.056
1.028
1.006

0.4553
0.4799
0.5345
0.6253
0.6453
0.7956
0.8564
1.155

Hence length of backwater cure = 22.4 miles

Part II
Design of barrage profile for sub surface flow condition
15 - Fixing of Depth of Sheet Piles
Scour depth, R
Depth of u/s sheet pile from HFL = 1.5 R
Max. USWL for Qmax
RL of bottomo fu/s sheet pile = Max. USWL - 1.5R
Depth of d/s sheet pile below HFL = 2R
RL of bottom of intermediate sheet pile = Max. USWL - 2R
Let RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile

604.0 ft

589.45 ft

582.0

1: 4

19.55 ft
30 ft
604.0 ft
574.0 ft
40 ft
564.0 ft
548 ft

1: 3

577.00
B

574.0

75.00
M

564.0
29.81

1.5H = 46.5

37.35

548.0

16 - Calculation of Exit Gradient

GE

H
1
x
d

b
E

b1

d
D

= b/d
Parmeters of Khosla's
Curve

Let the water be headed up to Max. accreted level u/s


and no flow d/s.
Retogression
DSFL

604.0 ft

= b/d

6.71
0.153

4 ft
577.0 ft
31.0 ft
Differential head causing seepeage, H = Max. u/s WL - (DSFL - Retrogression)
Depth of d/s sheet pile, d = DSFL - RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile 29.0 ft
Total length of concrete floor = b
194.66 ft
1
1 form ~

curve

GE

0.164 SAFE

17 - Calculation of Uplift Pressure After Applying Correction


17.1 U/s pile line:
Length of concrete floor upto u/s sheet pile, b1
Total length of concrete floor, b

46.5 ft
194.66 ft

Depth of u/s sheet pile,d


Assume tf u/s floor thickness

8.0 ft
2.5 ft
0.0411
24.33

1/ = d/b
= b/d
b1/b

0.239

1 - b1/b
B = D From khosla's curve
A = E From khosla's curve
K = c From khosla's curve

0.761
66 %
67 %
61 %

100 - 34
100 - 33

i) Correction for floor thickness


Correction in

Correction in

tf
d
tf

B K

1.563 %

A B

-ve

0.3125 %

+ve

8.0 ft
18.0 ft
194.66 ft
73.16 ft
1.26 %

ii) Correction for interface of sheet pile


Correction in

d D

due to second pile =19

D
b'

Depth of u/s sheet pile,d


D = RBL - RL of bottom of second pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'
Correction in K

K
iii) Slope correction for
Correction for K FS

bs
b1

For 1:4 slope, Fs (from slope correction curve)


3.3
Distance between two piles, b1
73.16 ft
Horizontal projection of u/s glacis, bs = (crest level - RBL) x 1/slope 29.81 ft
Correction for K
-1.34
Hence
Correted A
66.6875 %
Corrected B
66 %
Corrected K
62.477 %
17.2 Intermediate sheet pile at toe of d/s glacis:
Assume floor thickness
DSFL

10 ft
577.00 ft

RL of intermediate sheet pile


d = DSFL - RL of Intermediate sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Length of concrete floor up to sheet pile, b1

564.00 ft
13.00 ft
194.66 ft
119.66 ft

b1/b

0.615

1 - b1/b

0.385
14.97
52 %
54 %
36.5 %

= b/d
L E From khosla's curve
M D From khosla's curve
N C From khosla's curve

100 - 48
100 - 46

i) Correction due to floor thickness


Correction in L
Correction in N

tf
d
tf

L M
M

1.53846 %

13.46 %

ii) Correction due to interference of pile


Correction in L due to u/s sheet pile19 d D
b

D
b'

Depth of Intermediate sheet pile,d


D = RBL - RL of bottom of u/s sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'
Correction in L = 19 d D
b

D
b'

d D
Correction in N due to d/s sheet pile19
=

b
Depth of Intermediate sheet pile,d
D = DSFL - RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'
d D

Correction in N = 19

D
b'

13.0 ft
18.00 ft
194.66 ft
73.16 ft
-1.50 %

D
b'

13.00 ft
29.00 ft
194.66 ft
75.00 ft
2.55 %

L
iii) Slope correction for
for '1:3 slope, Fs

4.5

bs = (crest level - DSFL) x 1/slope

37.35 ft

Distance between two piles, b1

73.16 ft

Correction in L FS

bs
b1

2.30 %

L FS

bs
b1

Hence
Corrected L
Corrected M
Corrected N

54.34 %
54 %
52.51 %

17.3 D/s sheet pile at the end of impervious floor


Assume floor thickness
Depth of d/s sheet pile, d
Total length of concrete floor, b
1/ = d/b
P E From khosla's curve
Q D From khosla's curve
R C From khosla's curve

100 - 68
100 - 78

7 ft
29.00 ft
194.66 ft
0.149
32 %
22 %
0%

i) Correction due to floor thickness


Correction in P
Correction in R

-2.41 %
5.31 %

ii) Correction due to interface of piles


Correction in P
Depth of d/s sheet pile,d
D = DSFL - RL of bottom of intermediate sheet pile
Total length of concrete floor, b
Distance between two piles, b'

d D
Correction in P =19

D
b'

29.00 ft
13.00 ft
194.66 ft
75.00 ft
-1.71 %

Hence
Corrected P
Corrected Q
Corrected R

27.88 %
22 %
5.31 %

Table: Uplift pressure at E, D, C and along the sheet piles


Symbol used in
Khosla cueve

E
D

u/s Pile
line
A = 66.69%
B =
66%
K

Intermediate
Line
L =
54.34%
M =
54%
N

d/s Pile
Line
P = 27.88%
Q =
22%
R

D
C

K =

62.48%

N =

52.51%

18 - Calculation For Floor Thickness:


tf

H
100 G 1

where
tf = Thickness of floor in ft

= % Uplift pressure

H = Maximum differential head causing seepage


G = Specific gravity of concrete

2.4

a) Thickness of floor at A
Assumend thickness
H
Thickness from uplift pressure
say

2.5 ft
27.00 ft
12.86 ft
13.00 ft

say

10 ft
10.48 ft
11.00 ft

say

10 ft
10.13 ft
11.00 ft

say

7 ft
5.38 ft
6.00 ft

b) Thickness of floor at L
Assumend thickness
Thickness from uplift pressure
c) Thickness of floor at N
Assumend thickness
Thickness from uplift pressure
d) Thickness of floor at P
Assumend thickness
Thickness from uplift pressure
e) Thickness of floor at crest

L
Pressure at
crest

5.31%

Pressure at
crest
y

K L
(x)
Uplift pressure at crest L
y
Hence
Thickness of floor at crest d/s of gate

58.4922 %
11.2806 ft
say
12 ft

cusecs/ft
cusecs/ft

cusecs/ft

Eo

h/Eo

C'/C

C'

qclear

(cusecs/ft)

(cusecs)

(Gibson)

(USWL+ho-CL)

(ft)

16.23
14.49
9.43
5.21

0.77
0.76
0.85
0.68

0.810
0.815
0.760
0.920

3.08
3.10
2.89
3.50

201.3
170.8
83.6
41.6

664221.95
563797.82
275999.79
137391.44

O.K

14.47
13.14
8.01

0.45
0.54
0.32

0.950
0.930
0.980

3.61
3.53
3.72

198.8 655955.61
168.4 555619.13
84.4 278626.51

O.K

17.13
15.41
13.30

0.88
0.88
0.94

0.730
0.730
0.470

2.77
2.77
1.79

196.7 649176.95
167.8 553639.38
86.6
285743

O.K

Eo

h/Eo

C'/C

C'

qclear

(cusecs/ft)

(cusecs)

O.K
O.K
O.K

O.K
O.K

O.K
O.K

(Gibson)

(USWL+ho-CL)

(ft)

17.79

0.42

0.92

3.50

262.36 157414.34 Err:508

17.44

0.20

0.94

3.57

260.11 156063.65 Err:508

18.53

0.62

0.91

3.46

275.84 165503.38 Err:508

blench curves

cusecs/ft

cusecs/ft

cusecs/ft

cusecs/ft

pth method.

270000

216000
max
min
602.75 597.46
602
597
25.75 20.46
80.00

80.00

25.00

20.00

0.612
0.080
0.504

0.864
0.115
0.585

2.06

2.35

12.98

11.97

12.02
8.03
O.K
O.K

ft
540000
155503
Min.
603.89
590.00
37.89
259
24.00
1.11
0.155
0.630
5.87
23.87
0.13
O.K

cusecs/ft

cusecs/ft

ft (block= 4'x4'x4')

ft (block= 4'x4'x4')

Concrete Blocks
')x4'x4'4(

"9

Gravel

Coarse sand" 9
Sand" 6

"9
Gravel
Coarse sand" 9
Sand" 6

ft above HFL
ft above HFL

( max for earthen channels)

from barrage level

ft3/unit width

d2
(5)x(10)
L
2 1
x(1) =(11)+(4)
D

0.4799
0.5345
0.6253
0.6453
0.7956
0.8564
1.155
1.5881

10

11

12

0.0246
2145
4645
0.0546
4760
7260
0.0908
7916 10416
0.02
1744
4244
0.1503 13103 15603
0.0608
5301
7801
0.2986 26033 28533
0.4331 37759 39759
Total
118260 ft
22.40 miles

rrection

Table F Conjugate depth d2 for different discharges under gated and ungated flows.
Basic Data:
b
EL
700000
842000
950000

Clear width of the weir section of the barrage


Barrage Crest Level
Ungated Discharge
Ungated Discharge
Ungated Discharge
Theoretical velocity for gated
control flow

For ungated flow

2520
678
692.74
694.55
695.84

H Z d /2
H Z h/2 d /2
Trial 1

q=Q/b
(cfs/ft) H

Q (cfs)

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft

Vth
(ft) ft/sec

Vact
ft/sec

d1
(ft)

Trial 2
Vth
Vact
d1
FR1
(ft) ft/sec ft/sec ft

d2/ d1

d2

ft

50000

14.88

24.00

39.31

33.42

0.45

23.78

39.13

29.35

0.51

7.26

9.78

4.96

100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
700000

29.76

24.00

39.31

33.42

0.89

23.55

38.95

29.21

1.02

5.10

6.73

6.86

59.52

24.00

39.31

33.42

1.78

23.11

38.58

28.93

2.06

3.55

4.55

9.37

89.29

24.00

39.31

33.42

2.67

22.66

38.20

32.47

2.75

3.45

4.41

12.12

119.05

24.00

39.31

33.42

3.56

22.22

37.83

32.15

3.70

2.94

3.69

13.68

148.81

24.00

39.31

33.42

4.45

21.77

37.45

31.83

4.68

2.59

3.20

14.97

208.33

15.37

31.46

26.74

7.79

11.47

27.18

23.11

9.02

1.36

1.48

13.36

250.00

16.28

32.37

27.52

9.08

11.73

27.49

23.36

10.70

1.26

1.35

14.43

282.74

16.92

33.01

28.06

10.08

11.88

27.66

23.51

12.02

1.19

1.26

15.18

840000
950000

EL694

EL 678
d

EL673
1:3
EL 670

EL 678
d

EL673
1:3
EL 670

D/S WL
674.96
676.86
679.37
682.12
683.68
684.97
683.36
684.43
685.18

Part I
Design of barrage for overflow condition
1
2
3
4
5

7
8
9

10

11
12
13
14

Minimum stable wetted perimeter


Calculation of Lacey's silt factor
Fixation of crest level
Design of undersluices
Determination of water levels and energy levels
5.1 Check for main weir
5.2 Check fo undersluices
Fixation of d/s floor levels and length of d/s glacis and d/s floor
6.1 Fixation of d/s floor levels for normal weir section using blench curves
6.2 Fixation of floor levels for undersluices
Fixation of d/s floor level for normal barrage section using
Crump's method and determination of floor length
Fixation of d/s floor length for undersluices
Check for the adequacy for d/s floor levels using conjugate
depth method
9.1 For normal weir section
9.2 For undersluice section
Scour protection
10.1 d/s scour protection
10.2 u/s scour protection
10.3 Thickness of aprons
Inverted filter design
Design of guide banks
12.1 Determination of levels of guide banks
Design of guide bank aprons
Design of marginal bunds

Part II
Design of barrage profile for sub surface flow condition
15
16
17

18

Fixation of depth of sheet piles


Calculation of exit gradients
Calculation of uplift pressure after applying correction
17.1 u/s pile length
17.2 Intermediate sheet pile at toe of d/s glacis
17.3 d/s sheet pile at the end of impervious floor
Calculation of floor thickness

and d/s floor


using blench curves

days
Done
0

Done
0
Done
0

conjugate
Done
0

Done
0
Done
Done

0
0

Done
0

Done

total

days left

You might also like