Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12
4. Gap Closer
16
TRADING Strategies
inding a strategy that backtests successfully is rare; finding one that is reproducible in
live trading is rarer still.
The following intraday strategy the
Morning Gap Reversal (MGR) capitalizes on the major indices tendency to
retrace toward the prior days close each
morning. It has a high winning percentage
tested in both bull and bear conditions
an important characteristic for any shortterm strategy and it is easy to execute.
Each morning the opening price of an
index or stock is higher or lower than the
Statistically, price has a very high likelihood of filling between 50 and 100 percent of the gap between yesterdays
close and todays open during the trading day. Usually, a reversal that fills (or
partially fills) the gap will occur within
the first 30 minutes of trading (by 10 a.m.
ET).
Three years of back-testing from
January 1999 to January 2003 on the
Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDU),
S&P 500 (SPX) and Nasdaq 100 (NDX)
indices was conducted to verify the statistical reliability of the basis for the
MGR strategy. The analysis was
FIGURE 1 MORNING GAPS: REVERTING TO THE CLOSE
divided into three parts: first, deterIn the first half-hour of the trading session, the market will frequently retrace in
mining the frequency and extent of
the direction of the previous days close.
morning gap reversals; second, finding out how quickly morning gaps
S&P 500 index-tracking stock (SPY),
88.97
reversed; and third, identifying
one-minute
88.92
important
time markers within
88.88
the reversal period.
88.84
88.80
Table 1 summarizes the first part
88.76
of the analysis. The columns show
Market open price
88.72
different gap sizes, from 1 to 3 per88.68
cent (positive or negative). The rows
88.64
88.60
show what percentage of the gaps
88.56
were filled, and the cells show how
88.52
often
they were filled (at some point
88.48
during the trading session).
88.44
Reversal
88.40
The table shows 85 percent of the
88.36
gaps between zero and 1 percent in
Gap up
88.32
size (positive or negative) closed at
88.28
least halfway, and 78 percent of the
88.24
88.20
gaps closed between 90 and 100 per88.16
cent.
88.12
Although slightly less reliable,
Prior day close
88.08
gaps between 1 and 2 percent (posi88.04
88.01
tive or negative) showed a similar
1/22 15:40 15:45 15:50 15:55 1/23 9:35 9:40 9:45 9:50 9:55 10:00 10:05 10:10
tendency to be partially retraced or
Source: Great-Trade by Protrader
2
The time markers for the typical down gap are the same
as those for up gaps.
Prior day
closing price
Trade is maximized
9:53 a.m.
Prior day
closing price
Price jig
usually
9:42-9:47 a.m.
Morning bottom
on average
9:36 a.m. EST
TRADING Strategies
GAP
BY DAVID S. NASSAR
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40132
39
35
300,000,000
Volume
200,000,000
28
Charged stocks/sectors;
Volume and volatility;
Chaos and over-activity;
High risk (elasticity).
5
Sept.
11
18
25
2
Oct.
16
23
30
Nov.
13
1200.00
1150.00
1100.00
1050.00
1000.00
950.00
900.00
850.00
800.00
750.00
700.00
651.22
21
28
Sept.
11
18
25
2
Oct.
16
23
100,000,000
74,009,300
0
30
Nov.
13
600.00
1,000,000
500,000
255,300
11 12 13 14 15
0
10 11 12 13 14 15 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 11
10/20 Friday
10/23 Monday
10/24 Tuesday
10/25 Wednesday
10/26 Thursday
10/27 Friday
10/30 Monday
ments. This is because most positive earnings expectations are built into the stock
price in the days prior to the report. For
this reason, stocks have a greater propensity to fall when companies merely meet
expectations.
When expectations are missed, the
downside bias is dramatic. Therefore,
you should rarely take an overnight
position in a company that is reporting
earnings after the close. If you do, your
natural bias should be to trade the short
side especially in this market environment, where good earnings are often no
match for inflationary pressure, rising
interest rates and oil prices.
Because so many stocks have an
upside bias in the days prior to an earnings report, it is best to sell into the news
if youre long the stock, and wait for the
outcome. Figure 2 is an example of what
companies experience when they miss
expectations.
Short squeezes and profit taking.
Short squeezes and profit taking are the
most common reasons stocks will tend to
build above-average volume into the
close and cause what is called a hook
close.
In a short squeeze, a stock is in a
downtrend and market makers suspect
there may be many short sellers in the
market. The squeeze and the hook occur
when the professionals begin to buy the
stock rapidly into the close, causing price
to rise swiftly and forcing the short sellers to cover in a panic. Profit taking generally occurs when a stock is in a rising
trend but shows a weak close accompanied by high volume. At this point,
traders with long positions begin to sell
the stock to take a profit. Figure 3 shows
an example of a short squeeze, while
Figure 4 is an example of a hook formed
9
72
70
68
66
64
62
60
59 18
1,200,000
1,057,900
1,000,000
Volume
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
12
13
14
15
10
11
10/25 Wednesday
12
13
14
15
10
11
10/26 Thursday
12
13
14
15
0
10
10/27 Friday
FIGURE 4 PROFIT-TAKING
Transwitch Corp. (TXCC) was on its way to recovery from a sell-off in the fiber optic group. Along the way, profit taking
on Oct. 30 forced the price lower at the end of the day. The next morning the stock gapped higher, with the buyers
once again firmly in control.
Transwitch Corp. (TXCC), 5-minute
56 516
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
Volume
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
8,200
14
15
10
11
12
13
10/27 Friday
14
15
10
11
12
10/30 Monday
13
14
15
10
11
12
10/31 Tuesday
By contrast, if the stock continues to follow-through in the direction of the gap, its
a strong indication that the trend will continue.
Remember, however, that while these
rules are good to use as a guide, they
should not be traded with indiscretion.
There are many factors that impact any
individual gap-trading situation.
11
&
FUTURES
Trading Strategies
OPTIONS
Trading the
OPENING GAP
BY JOHN CARTER
Percentage of
gaps filled
because of the diversity of their component stocks. Both indices represent collections of stocks from different industries
that are more likely to react independently to news events. In the technologyheavy Nasdaq, opening price gaps can
take longer to fill because the majority of
the stocks will react similarly to news.
The key to trading opening gaps is
being able to predict the likelihood a
particular gap will be filled. Dissecting
the market conditions that produce a
gap is as important as analyzing a gap
itself. For example, an opening gap following high pre-market cash trading
volume can take weeks to get filled
because high volume increases the odds
the market will continue to move in the
direction of the gap.
Some of the biggest gaps are caused
by major news events, such as the outbreak of a war, but gaps caused by minor
news items are much more common.
Generally, such gaps are smaller, fill
quickly (see Table 1) and can be faded
(the act of trading against the direction
of the gap) more effectively. Lets look at
Monday
65%
Pre-market volume
in key stocks
Tuesday
77%
Full size
Wednesday
79%
82%
Between
30,000 and 70,000
2/3 size
Thursday
Friday
78%
Above 70,000
Source: Tradethemarkets.com
12
Position size
No fade trade
Trade target
No fade trade
Source: Tradethemarkets.com
www.activetradermag.com December 2004 ACTIVE TRADER
The strategy
Figure 1 is a five-minute chart of the
9,820
Gap is filled for a 47-point
gain, or $235 per contract
(47 points x $5 per point).
9,810
9,800
9,790
9,780
9,770
9,760
9,750
9,740
9,730
9,720
9,710
10/15/03
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
9:00
9,700
10:00
Source: eSignal
&
FUTURES
OPTIONS
9,790
Gap filled for a 61-point
gain, or $305 per contract.
9,780
9,770
9,760
9,750
9,740
9,730
9,720
9,710
9,700
10/16/03
15:00
9:00 10:00
Source: eSignal
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
1,106
1,105
Close on 7/30/04:
1,103.75
1,104
1,103
1,102
1,101
1,100
1,099
1,098
1,097
Open on 8/2/04:
1,097.00
14:45 15:0515:25 15:45
Source: TradeStation
14
8/2
1,096
thousand dollars, this trading plan controls risk by limiting exposure relative
to the amount of available capital.
Use a 1:1.5 reward/risk ratio (risking
1.5 points to make 1 point) for gap
trades that are less than 40 mini Dow
points or 4 E-mini S&P points. For gaps
larger than these, use a 1:1 reward/risk
ratio. In the case of Figure 1, we would
risk 47 points to make 47 points. If the
gap had been 30 points, we would risk
45 points.
Some traders might question an
approach that risks more than the
potential profit. Most beginning traders
are taught to use a 3:1 reward/risk
ratio, risking 1 point to gain 3. They
inevitably wonder why they are repeatedly stopped out just before the market
turns. In general, wider stops produce
more winning trades; the key is to trade
only those setups with a better than 80percent chance of winning.
The market sold off immediately
after the bell, filling the opening gap
within an hour. Ironically, the next day
IBM came out with a disappointing
earnings report, knocking the market
down on the open. Figure 2 shows the
resulting buy setup had just a small
open loss at one point, although many
traders might have been stopped out
on the pullback around 11 a.m. ET.
However, keep in mind the strategy
is to maintain a reward/risk ratio of
1:1, not to tighten your stop when
the market moves in your favor. If
the stop had been hit, the loss would
have been approximately $305 per
contract ($2,745 for the nine-contract
full position), not including slippage
and commissions. This loss is reasonable because of the 80-percent
success rate of the setup.
Using a tighter initial stop or trailing stop would have turned this
position into a losing trade or, at
best, a breakeven trade. Using the
risk parameters designed for this
trade setup allowed the position to
remain open until the gap was filled
for a gain of 61 points. As a rule,
using a trailing stop will negatively
affect the gap trades win/loss ratio.
When the trade is executed, the
best thing a trader can do is to walk
away and let the orders do their
work. This is the difference between
professionals
and
amateurs:
Professionals wont second-guess a
9,500
9,480
9,460
9,440
9,420
9,400
9,380
9,360
9,340
9,320
9,300
Figure 4 shows a 15-minute chart of
Gap
on
8/18
of
+44
points
the September mini Dow futures
fills on 8/25
9,280
(YMU04) with an opening gap on
Aug. 18 that did not get filled for
8/18
13:15 8/19 11:45 14:15 8/20 12:45
8/21
13:45 8/22 12:15
8/25
13:15 8/26
six trading days. (Other opening
gaps occurred before price eventuSource: TradeStation
ally filled the first gap.) On this day,
the mini Dow gapped up a modest
profit ($2,295). All these gaps followed each type of trade setup.
44 points prior to the release of some light pre-market volume, so they were
Gaps are the one moment of the tradeconomic numbers. The pre-market volexecuted with full positions.
ing day where everyone has to show
ume was modest, between 30,000 and
On Aug. 22, 2003, Intel announced their poker hand, and this creates a big
70,000 shares for the key stocks, so the
cautious upside earnings revisions.
advantage for short-term traders.
appropriate step was to short a two- The market exploded to the upside and
Understanding the dynamics behind
thirds-size position on the open.
gapped right above key resistance. The
opening gaps is paramount to trading
The market rallied, sold off a little just trade was to short the 62-point gap with them successfully.
prior to the economic numbers, and then a full-size position. Six bars later, the tarshot higher once the numbers were
get was hit for a 62-point profit, or $310 For information on the author see p. 10.
released. Using the 1:1 reward/risk ratio per contract ($2,790).
resulted in a 44-point stop. The market
During the afternoon session, the marRelated Active Trader
never retraced to the gaps midpoint ket traced out a bear flag pattern. With
level (where half the position could be the opening gap under the market still
articles
covered), and instead rallied right
unfilled, the trade was to place a sell stop
Trading the overnight gap by David
through the stop, producing a loss of at 9,392 to let the trend of the market iniNassar, March 2001, p. 66
$220 per contract. For a two-thirds positiate the trade based on a breakdown of
Morning reversal strategy by Bryan
tion (six contracts) the loss was $1,320.
the flag. The entry stop was filled and the
C. Babcook and Arthur Agnelli,
This move left an open gap below the risk point for the trade was above intraMay 2003, p. 36
market. The next day the market opened day resistance at 9,455. The target was the
modestly lower, triggering a long trade Aug. 18 gap at 9,304. The market spent
Technical Tool Insight: Gaps, April
that resulted in a quick $65-per-contract the rest of the day trending lower, filling
2003, p. 82
profit ($585 total). The following day the
the gap and resulting in an 88-point gain,
Technical Tool Insight: Islands,
market opened 52 points lower and or $440 per contract ($3,960).
August 2002, p. 82
filled the gap a few hours later for a
$260-per-contract profit ($2,340). The
A brief window of opportunity
You can purchase past articles online
next day, the market gapped up 44 The markets nature is to prevent as
at www.activetradermag.com/
points, triggering a short trade that came many people as possible from consispurchase_articles.htm and download
close to the stop-loss point, but eventual- tently making money, which is why it is
them to your computer.
ly filled the gap for a $255-per-contract
crucial for a trader to follow rules for
ACTIVE TRADER December 2004 www.activetradermag.com
15
Gap closer
130,000
120,000
Markets: Any.
110,000
100,000
1/7/94
1/3/95
1/2/96
Equity
1/2/97
1/4/99
Cash
1/3/00
1/2/01
1/2/02
1/2/03
Linear reg
Volume
20M
July 2002
Source for all figures: Wealth-Lab Inc. (www.wealth-lab.com)
16
August 2002
September 2002
Rules:
1. Enter long on the open the day after a
down gap greater than the 20-bar average true range (ATR) is completed.
2. Place a limit order to sell the position at
the low price of the bar that immediately preceded the gap.
3. The system will maintain multiple
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
-10%
-12%
-14%
-16%
-18%
-20%
-22%
-24%
11,942
11.94
28.42
1.27
0.34
0.35
Drawdown
Max. DD (%):
Longest flat days:
-24.75
465
2/1/95
1/30/96
2/3/97
1/4/99
1/3/00
1/2/01
1/2/02
1/2/03
Trade statistics
No. trades:
62
Win/loss (%):
80.65
Avg. gain/loss (%):
2.69
Avg. holding time:
148.15
Avg. profit (winners):
10.97
Avg. hold time (winners): 100.06
PERIODIC RETURNS
-31.80
Weekly
0.03%
0.16
6.56% -12.50%
49.23%
17
348.50
38/4
Monthly
0.15%
0.16
13.54% -9.68%
47.90%
Quarterly 0.43%
0.15
16.34% -14.11%
53.66%
Annually
0.22
10.73% -12.90%
60.00%
1.60%
%
Max.
Max.
Profitable consec.
consec.
periods profitable unprofitable
LEGEND: Avg. return the average percentage for the period Sharpe ratio
average return divided by standard deviation of returns (annualized)
Best return best return for the period Worst return worst return for
the period % Profitable periods the percentage of periods that were prof itable Max. consec. profitable the largest number of consecutive prof itable periods Max. consec. unprofitable the largest number of consec utive unprofitable periods
Trading System Lab strategies are tested on a portfolio basis (unless
otherwise noted) using Wealth-Lab Inc.s testing platform.
If you have a system youd like to see tested, please send the trading and money-management rules to editorial@activetradermag.com.
Disclaimer: The Trading System Lab is intended for educational purposes only to provide a perspective on different market concepts. It is not meant to recommend or
promote any trading system or approach. Traders are advised to do their own research and testing to determine the validity of a trading idea. Past performance does not
guarantee future results; historical testing may not reflect a systems behavior in real-time trading.
17
FUTURES
Gap closer
The equity curve exhibits some volatility, but also an overall upward
bias and extremely low market exposure. This is a result of the small
number of trades, as well as their short holding periods.
Markets: Any.
System concept: The stock Trading System Lab (p. 54) featured an experimental system designed to trade gaps. The
intention was to go long on every down gap and hold the
position until the gap was closed (if it ever closed). This provides useful information about the dynamics of gap behavior.
However, it is not possible to hold a losing futures position in a similar manner because the higher leverage in
futures results in losses of a much larger magnitude. Taking
this into account, the futures system goes long right when
price is starting to fill a down gap. The absence of resistance
in the price void of the gap should provide positive momentum for a long trade. Based on the results of the stock test, it
is likely most of the gaps will be filled.
In addition, this system uses three different exits to protect capital while giving trades room to breathe. The strategy uses a breakeven stop entered soon after the trade is profitable to protect against a reversal. When the gap is not filled
and prices do not reach our breakeven level, we employ a
wide stop-loss order.
The system should have a large number of winning and
breakeven trades, and a small number of large losses.
Because of the high expected win-loss ratio, the strategy uses an
aggressive maximum risk setting (10 percent equity loss per
FIGURE 2 SAMPLE TRADES
200,000
190,000
180,000
170,000
160,000
150,000
140,000
130,000
120,000
110,000
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
8/16/93
7/4/94
6/2/95
Equity
370.00
360.00
350.00
340.00
330.00
320.00
310.00
300.00
290.00
Volume
100,000
May 1999
June 1999
July 1999
18
August 1999
September 1999
4/1/97
3/2/98
Cash
1/3/00
1/2/01
1/2/02
Linear reg
trade). All traders must weigh these considerations and determine their personal risk tolerance when deciding on the stoploss and maximum risk levels.
Gaps in gold trigger two trades. The green lines represent the entry points and the red lines
represent the profit-target exits. Notice how prices gapped up to close the first gap down,
forming an island reversal. The second gap also closed, but not before the trade was
stopped out. Increasing the stop-loss distance would have turned this trade into a winner.
Gold futures (GC), daily
5/1/96
October 1999
Rules:
1. A long entry setup occurs when there is
a down gap greater than the 20-bar average true range (ATR). Multiple open
trades are acceptable.
2. Go long on a buy stop order at the high
of the down-gap bar plus one tick.
3. Exit with a profit using a limit order at
the low of the bar that preceded the
down gap.
4. Place a stop-loss order below the entry
price that is three times the distance
between the entry price and the profit
target level.
Note: Wait until the close of the entry bar
before placing the profit target and stoploss orders.
5. As soon as the contract closes with a gain
of at least one percent, place a breakeven
stop to exit at the entry price.
Risk control and money management:
1. Starting equity: $100,000. Deduct $10
slippage/commission per contract
(entry and exit).
2. The number of contracts to buy is determined by calculating the distance
between the entry price and the initial
stop-loss level. Buy the number of
contracts that results in a maximum loss
of 10 percent if the stop-loss is hit.
0.00%
-2.00%
-4.00%
-6.00%
-8.00%
-10.00%
-12.00%
-14.00%
-16.00%
-18.00%
-20.00%
-22.00%
-24.00%
8/16/93
STRATEGY SUMMARY
Profitability
Trade statistics
94,659
94.66
Exposure (%):
3.07
No. trades:
Win/loss (%):
69
69.57
0.96
16.62
Profit factor:
1.79
Payoff ratio:
0.96
2.54
Recovery factor:
2.08
8.96
Drawdown
Max. DD (%):
Longest flat days:
-2.65%
-25.27
34.14
570
7/3
7/5/94
6/6/95
5/3/96
4/4/97
3/5/98
1/3/00
1/2/01
1/2/02
trades was 2.54 percent, while the average loss of losing trades
was -2.65 percent. Overall, these are very positive statistics,
considering the degree to which the win-loss ratio is leaning
toward the win column.
The similar behavior of gaps in stocks and futures is interesting. By analyzing the behavior of gaps in one market we
were able to design a profitable system based on the same phenomenon in a different market.
The message of this strategy is that it is worthwhile to pay
attention to gaps, especially when prices start to fill a gap. The
lack of resistance in the gap area can be exploited if you can act
quickly enough.
Compiled by Dion Kurczek and Volker Knapp of Wealth-Lab Inc.
PERIODIC RETURNS
Avg. Sharpe Best Worst
return ratio return return
%
Max.
Max.
Profitable consec.
consec.
periods profitable unprofitable
Weekly
0.16%
0.50
15.91% -12.98%
24.28%
55
Monthly
0.70%
0.52
19.31% -12.98%
36.28%
13
Quarterly 2.05%
0.52
32.62% -12.16%
52.63%
39.42% -12.75%
77.78%
LEGEND: Avg. return the average percentage for the period Sharpe
ratio average return divided by standard deviation of returns (annualized)
Best return best return for the period Worst return worst return
for the period % Profitable periods the percentage of periods that were
profitable Max. consec. profitable the largest number of consecutive
profitable periods Max. consec. unprofitable the largest number of
consecutive unprofitable periods
Trading System Lab strategies are tested on a portfolio basis (unless
otherwise noted) using Wealth-Lab Inc.s testing platform.
If you have a system youd like to see tested, please send the trading and money-management rules to editorial@activetradermag.com.
Disclaimer: The Trading System Lab is intended for educational purposes only to provide a perspective on different market concepts. It is not meant to recommend or
promote any trading system or approach. Traders are advised to do their own research and testing to determine the validity of a trading idea. Past performance does not
guarantee future results; historical testing may not reflect a systems behavior in real-time trading.
19