Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
Over the years aircrafts have been developed with varying
methods of weapon carriage. It has been shown that external
weapons carriage may contribute as much as 30% of the total
drag of an air vehicle and in addition, substantially increase the
radar signature of the aircraft. Motivated by these
considerations, efforts to improve aircraft and stealth
technology have led to the desire to stow weapons in an
internal cavity-type bay. Unfortunately flight experience with
aircraft equipped with internal weapons bay has shown that
high speed flow over an open bay can produce a turbulent
environment within the bay that can damage the weapon(s) or
aircraft structure. Excessive structural vibrations may occur if
the acoustic frequency matches the characteristic structural
(4)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Where equation (8) will give the u component of velocity,
equation (9) will give the v component of vecolity and equation
(10) will give the pressure. Next the method and the code
developed is validated by performing validation runs as
explained in coming paragraphs.
B. Plot of Velocity Components
In order to validate the results, the u velocity distribution
along the vertical centre line and v-velocity distribution along
the horizontal centre line were plotted for Re=100 on a 81x 81
uniform grid with a tolerance limit of 10-4. The plots obtained
were compared with available results in literature and were
found to be in complete harmony with them. The plots are
shown in figure 1 and figure 2.
Grid Size
U Component of Velocity
(0.5, 0)
(0.5, 0.25)
(0.5, 0.5)
(0.5, 0.75)
(0.5, 1)
21 x 21
-0.1259
-0.1802
0.0721
41 x 41
-0.1494
-0.2031
0.0503
61 x 61
-0.1481
-0.2078
0.0384
81 x 81
-0.1443
-0.2053
0.0393
101 x 101
-0.1442
-0.2071
0.0351
V Component of Velocity
(0, 0.5)
(0.25, 0.5)
(0.5, 0.5)
(0.75, 0.5)
(1, 0.5)
21 x 21
0.1292
0.0217
-0.1965
41 x 41
0.1606
0.0291
-0.2268
61 x 61
0.1645
0.0526
-0.2157
81 x 81
0.1697
0.0497
-0.2272
101 x 101
0.1702
0.0610
-0.2263
It is clear from the comparison tables that the values are not
changing much after a certain grid sizes, i.e. the results for the
grid sizes are same for higher number of grid sizes.
D. Contour Plots
The horizontal and vertical velocity contours, spanwise
vorticity contours and velocity vector plots are shown in the
figures below: -
Minimum U velocity
Coordinates
100
-0.24380
(0.6375, 0.4875)
400
-0.3137
(0.6502, 0.4012)
1000
-0.3272
(0.675, 0.3875)
III. RESULTS
The numerical scheme used and the code developed has
been validated by the comparisons and studies explained in the
numerical methodology section. The actual problem in hand
i.e. to study the pressure distribution along the walls of the
intenal weapons bay was analyzed with the validated numerical
code. The only difference between the 2-D lid driven cavity
problem analyzed before and the weapons bay is that the
moving wall is now along the bottom of the cavity instead of
the top as studied before and also the horizontal length of the
weapons bay under consideration is four times as compared to
the cavity used for validation of the code. The necessary
changes in the boundary conditions and the cavity size has
been made to get the results for the weapons bay. The analysis
of the weapons bay has been run with Reynolds number of
IV. DISCUSSION