Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Deep matrix hydraulic fracturing is a precondition for
transforming low permeability shale gas reservoirs into
commercial assets; however, stimulating production involves
more than increasing fracture permeability hydraulically.
Planning and coordinating multiple services and designing
multi-functional frac fluids are critical elements for project
success.
Integrating the various frac services into a seamless
operation requires up-front planning that includes a project
survey and evaluation to determine the appropriate service and
chemical options required for a low-risk, safe and productive
operation.
An integral part of the planning process is the selection of
frac fluid components to control bacterial growth, corrosion
and scale production. An all-purpose lubricant and surface
tension reducer are key components for reducing hydraulic
friction and increasing flow-back volumes, respectively.
Finally it is important to ensure that all the frac fluid
components are compatible with each other, the frac water
itself and the formation material to avoid issues during the
fracturing process, flow-back period and production cycles of
the well. Furthermore, an integrated chemical program from
the fracturing through production will ensure a seamless
transition and comprehensive risk management program
throughout the life of the well.
This paper describes the process, from start to finish, how
project management, careful frac-fluid additive selection and
performance monitoring can optimize hydraulic fracturing
operations. In addition, laboratory data are presented to
illustrate the basis of fluid design and field data are presented
to highlight the success of this multi-disciplined approach to
improve unconventional shale gas recovery.
Introduction
Traditionally, conventional natural gas has been produced
from sandstone and carbonate rock formations. More recently,
however, the operators have begun to focus on unconventional
natural gas reserves extracted from low permeability, tight
sandstones, shale gas and coal bed methane formations to
increase the production of clean burning fuel. Hydraulic
fracturing is a proven technological advancement that allows
natural gas producers to safely recover natural gas from deep
shale formations.
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
Critical Considerations for Successful Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Gas Recovery
Flow-Stimulator Additive
Surfactants are used in the frac fluid to lower capillary
forces to assist in the recovery of the injected fluid during the
production phase.
Without proper screening of these
molecules, surfactants can be selected that adsorb on to the
fracture surfaces and cause phase trapping. The net effect of
phase trapping is reduced fracture permeability and reduced
production.
Laboratory testing has shown that microemulsion blends of
surfactants increase frac fluid flow-back in tight shale gas
reservoirs and lowers the pressure required for flowback10.
Another one of the important characteristics of these fluids is
their low interfacial tension11. Low interfacial tension is
critical because these interfacial forces are maintained as the
frac fluid enters the fracture spaces and when flowback
begins, the inherent mobility of the fluid is high. Figure 3
illustrates the low interfacial tension properties of a blend of
two dissimilar fluids, a microemulsion fluid and a heavy crude
oil.
Another necessary characteristic of the frac fluid design is
that it should lower surface tension properties between the
shale surface and the produced gas. The treatment levels of
this additive are low due to costs and thus, must exhibit low
surface tension properties in the ppm range. Figure 4 is a
graph of measured surface tension values at various low ppm
levels. Note that even at 10 ppm of active product, the surface
tension is similar to the surface tension measured at higher
ppm (e.g. 500, 200, 100, etc.).
Laboratory Studies
Bacterial Control
To determine the optimum biocide program for treating the
fracturing fluid bacterial populations, planktonic bacterial kill
studies were performed on several different chemically free
frac water sources12. The test involved inoculation of the water
with previously cultured indigenous bacteria, weighing out the
water into clean 6-oz glass prescription bottles, and dosing
with biocides at various concentrations. In addition, a control
sample with only indigenous bacteria was prepared. The
analysis exposed the bacteria in each sample to the biocides
for various contact times, such as 1 hour, 24 hours, 1 week and
3 weeks. The longer contact times simulated the fracturing
fluid water that is retained by the reservoir following the
flowback period.
At each contact time period, the serial dilution technique
was used to enumerate the surviving bacteria in each biocidetreated and control sample. The acid-producing bacteria
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
Critical Considerations for Successful Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Gas Recovery
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
Figures
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
Critical Considerations for Successful Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Gas Recovery
Sample Location
45.00%
% Drag Reduction
40.00%
Source Well
35.00%
Microscopy
(Bacteria/mL)
APB/mL
2 X 105
105
Frac Pit
7 X 10
SRB/mL
BD
102
10
30.00%
tap water
Wellhead
3 X 105
104
102
25.00%
0.5% NaCl
Separator
2 X 106
106
103
20.00%
1% NaCl
2% NaCl
15.00%
4% NaCl
10.00%
6% NaCl
5.00%
0.00%
2
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
Velocity (fps)
Microscopic Analysis
Algae/mL
APB/mL
SRB/mL
Pond #1
5 X 106
occasional
106
104
Lined Pit #1
9 X 106
BD
106
103
Opaque water
Pond #2
2 X 106
3.4 X 104
106
104
Opaque water
Pond #3
4 X 105
occasional
105
102
75.00%
% Drag Reduction
70.00%
Lined Pit #2
50.00%
45.00%
FR Only (Control)
9 X 10
Opaque water
6
BD
10
10
Lined Pit #3
3 X 10
BD
10
10
Lined Pit #4
3 X 107
BD
106
106
55.00%
65.00%
60.00%
Water Quality
Bacteria/mL
Black water;
lot of sediment
40.00%
0
10
12
Velocity (fps)
Clear water
Dark brown
water
AADE-10-DF-HO-08
Biocide A
Biocide B
30
105
50
10
75
BD
100
BD
Biocide D
Biocide E
Biocide F
105
105
BD
10
BD
BD
BD
BD
400
BD
350
BD
300
50
10
10
10
10
100
106
104
105
106
150
400
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
105
105
105
102
100
102
BD
103
BD
150
BD
BD
BD
BD
BD
6
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
Days
6
30
10
10
10
10
50
106
106
106
106
75
10
10
10
10
100
106
106
106
106
Day
BaSO4
Saturation
Index
Predicted BaSO4
Amount
(lbs/1000bbls)
25
10
10
10
106
2.3
78.2
50
106
106
106
106
100
106
106
104
104
15
2.67
254.1
25
106
106
106
106
30
2.51
172.1
50
106
106
106
106
45
2.56
124.1
100
106
106
105
103
3%
2%
10%
15%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
77%
88%
Acid-Producing Bacteria
Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria
Pressure (PSI)
FR Loading Rate (GPT)
3250
3000
2750
2500
2250
2000
1750
6:
18
6:
19
6:
21
6:
23
6:
24
6:
26
6:
28
6:
29
6:
31
6:
33
6:
34
6:
36
6:
38
6:
39
6:
41
6:
43
6:
44
6:
46
6:
48
6:
49
6:
51
1500
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
FR Loading Rate
(gallons per
thousand/gpt)
Friction Reduction
3500
SI Residual (ppm)
BD
6
Barium (mg/l)
200
50
BD
BD
6
100
200
200
200
Chloride (mg/L/200)
Sulfate (mg/l)
800
250
BD
6
Untreated Control
--10
10
10
10
*Results are expressed as number of positive bottles in a serial dilution series; a 9
bottle series was inoculated for the untreated control; a 6 bottle series was inoculated for
all treated samples.
106 = all 6 bottles in the serial dilution series were positive.
Pressure (PSI)
1000
600
5%
1200
450
BD
150
Biocide C
ppm
Biocide
Concentration
(ppm)
Time