Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintif
Versus
1. ______, carrying on business under
the name and style of Subas Project
as a sole proprietor thereof having his
principal place of business at Room
No ___, 2nd Floor, South Wing, 113,
Park Street, Poddar Point, Kolkata
700016 within the aforesaid
jurisdiction
Defendant
and renovation works at the said room and would not stop the works
unless and until instructed by the defendant no 2.
6) The plaintif was perplexed to know that the workmen were carrying
out construction and renovation work at the said room at the
instructions of the defendant no 2. Admittedly the defendant no 1 is
the owner of the said room and the defendant no 2 does not have
any right to occupy and/or carry out any construction/repair work at
the said room.
7) The plaintif immediately tried to contact the defendant no 1 but
could not locate the defendant no 1 and/or any of its
representatives. However, despite repeated requests the workmen
engaged by the defendant no to refuse to stop the construction and
renovation work being carried out by them in the said room.
8) On or about__, the plaintif found that a board of Grima Fashion
had been installed in front of the said room. The plaintif
immediately met with the defendant no 2 and/or his representatives
and enquired from him the basis on which and/or the capacity in
which the defendant no 2 was occupying the said room. In this
connection, the plaintif also wrote 2 several letters dated ___ and___
respectively to the defendant no 2, copies whereof are annexed
hereto and collectively marked as Annexure__ and the same may be
treated as a part of the plaint.
informed the officials of the plaintif that in the event they did not
want any trouble they should not interfere with the construction
work is being carried out by the defendant no 2.
11) The defendant no 2 has proceeded to carry out extensive and
elaborate construction and renovation works at the said room which
are having the efect of damaging the entire building at the
premises No 113, Park Street, Poddar Point, Kolkata 700016 within
the aforesaid jurisdiction and of severely afecting the structural
stability of the building without obtaining sanctioned plan from the
Kolkata Municipal Corporation. The defendant no 1 has further
allowed the defendant no 2 to carry out the aforesaid construction
works at the said room.
12) The plaintif as the owner of various portions of the premises No
113, Park Street, Poddar Point, Kolkata 700016 within the aforesaid
jurisdiction, morefully described in schedule I hereof has the right to
ensure that the building at the premises No 113, Park Street, Poddar
Point, Kolkata 700016 within the aforesaid jurisdiction is duly and
properly maintained and no construction work is carried out thereat
having the efect of damaging the building and/or afecting the
structural stability thereof.
13) The plaintif as the manager of the said premises No 113, Park
Street, Poddar Point, Kolkata 700016 within the aforesaid
jurisdiction is also entitled to ensure that the said building and every