Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A quick return analysis of the top North American picks from the Bank Of America/Merrill Lynch Quantitative Equities
team to determine the relative effectiveness and robustness of their model selections.
Background
After reading a relatively recent research piece coming out of Merrill Lynch (ML)’s Global Quantitative Research group in
May 2010 titled: “Bullish with a touch of sensitivity” and armed with my handy statistical modeling program, I set out to
see how well their picks performed. Given my negative outlook for the US markets since December 2006, I wondered if a
quantitative model could accurately pick stocks that would generate acceptable returns without causing excessive risk.
To get started, I focused only on the Growth category and attempted to apply some models that I have run across here
for analyzing and constructing portfolios, primarily: Constant Correlation Modelling, MVE Estimation, Covariance MCD
Estimation and Kendall Estimation with the latter 3 being used in the creation of “efficient” portfolios. Their initial
dataset consisted of 30 global equities across a variety of sectors and countries. My dataset for the sake of simplicity
revolves around North American equities (excluding Canada) which left me with a portfolio of 13 names, diversified
across an adequate number of sectors. Their dataset from what I can tell goes back 7 years, so I attempted to match that
as close as possible by obtaining daily price series dating back to January 2004.
Growth Portfolio Symbols: TD, AAPL, CLF, CMI, DV, EL, ESRX, HST, ISRG, MET, ORCL, BTU, WDC