Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Processes
Scott M. Shemwell, D.B.A
March 2003
CIOs told Gartner they now rank "providing guidance for the board and executives" as
their leading management priority, up from sixth on the 2002 list. Their top technology
priorities are securing systems from internal and external threats, followed by better
integrating applications to provide greater data availability throughout the enterprise.
– Bernadette Hearne
Editor, e-business Chemicals Newsletter
March 26, 20031
Abstract
Awash with data, organizations are facing new demands on their information
management processes. Security, corporate governance compliance, and real-time
asset management, are among the set of information driven activities that today’s
executive must address. Rather than be intimidated with these new demands, leading
companies can deploy information management systems that can further competitive
advantage.
Today’s information systems are mature, add shareholder value, and are the backbone of
high performing organization. Overcoming the Information Paradox will further separate
those firms that “get it” from those that do not. To be certain, there are many new
demands on firms and the information systems that enable organizations, but none that
cannot be overcome.
Introduction
Corporate officers and their auditors are under increased scrutiny to insure that publicly
traded firms report a “true” picture of the financial performance of the organization.
Moreover, the very ethics policies and enforcement processes of the firm must also be
divulged. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 20022, places new and specific demands on
Directors, certain corporate officers, and financial service professionals that is potentially
onerous. Specific record keeping policies must be adhered to and failure to comply can
3
lead to prison sentences up to 20 years on criminal charges of obstruction of justice.
Timely information regarding the status of dispersed assets has always been a
prerequisite for optimizing revenue and cash flow, but never more than today. The
double edge information sword that has been unsheathed is the demand to have a better
understanding of the exposure the global energy firm has to potential terrorism. The
infrastructure that fuels the world’s hunger for petroleum is very exposed to the mischief
4
of malcontents or downright destruction by those so inclined. Critical, “real-time”
information about the status of revenue producing assets, especially unmanned facilities
New Demands on Information Management Processes
will enable rapid response regardless of whether an outage is the result of a natural
disaster such as a hurricane or otherwise.
Finally, the petroleum industry faces increased pressure from stakeholders to increase
asset performance. Not only investors, but local communities, government agencies, and
environmental groups expect specific organizational behavior and appropriate
documentation of conduct.
Recessions are cathartic events. While the mettle of the strong is tested, the weak often
demise. As part of this renewal process, mergers and acquisitions change the
competitive landscape. Smart acquisitions may lead to enhanced shareholder value,
5
however, most mergers are dilutive .
Good and timely information clearly enables the modern organization. However, there is
an Information Paradox. Management is expecting Information Technology (IT)
organizations to reduce costs, while at the same time expecting greater information
security. Conversely, for many of the reasons articulated in this paper, management
must have more information quicker.
Concluding Thoughts
The rules of information engagement are changing. Firms depend on valid, reliable, and
timely information flow to achieve competitive advantage, and adhere to regulatory
requirements. The old ways of visualizing information as either a function of SCADA
(Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) or back office are gone.
Quality information is critical to enhancing shareholder value. Change is the norm,
however, change must happen quickly.15 When it does not, malaise ensues.
Changes in information flow can dictate cultural transformation. One school of thought
sees the interaction of organizations within a cultural context as the software of the
mind.16 Information provides a level of enlightenment that transcends historic
mechanistic organizational hierarchies. Information flow is an agent of cultural change.
Culture changes slowly and in small increments. It is fallacious to think that just
implementing a top down change management program will structurally change
organizational culture. However, change is a naturally occurring phenomenon and every
individual and organization is constantly undergoing transition, both as a function of
exogenous and endogenous forces.
17
“Petroleum is the lifeblood of current and emerging world economies.” A case can be
made that information flow is the nervous system for the largest business in the world.
Few seem to realize that the energy business is the largest (by far) industry in the world.
18
As the demands on the industry accelerate, the demands for information will keep pace.
In the new world order of 21st century oil and gas industry with its new challenges,
security, asset optimization, and governance information is the binding agent.
For over 15 years, pundits have been proclaiming the arrival of the Knowledge Age.
Finally, this era may be upon us. Timely, accurate, real-time information is not only the
basis of competitive advantage, but insures that the investment community “backs”
management.
The role of information management has already moved from back office or process
control into the executive suite. Information flow from the asset base, supply chain
partners, the back office, as well as all other aspects of the information value chain drive
new business models. The challenge to the CEO is whether his or her company meets
these criteria. If not, what changes will be required?
Endnotes
The referenced web links below were operational in March 2003. The writer makes no
guarantee that these references will remain active. The interpretation of this information
is solely the author’s.
Note: Readers interested in the broad issue of Corporate Governance are invited to
review a wealth of material on http://www.thecorporatelibrary.com/
1
EyeforChem Newsletter. http://www.eyeforchem.com/index.asp?src=hn&nli=og-
c&nld=2/27/2003&news=35684
2
H.R. 3763, One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America.
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/gwbush/sarbanesoxley072302.pdf
3
ARMA (Association of Records Managers and Administrators) International. (2003).
Information Management: A Business Imperative – FAQs for Corporate Executives and
Decision-Makers. http://www.arma.org/pdf/rim_imperative.pdf
4
Adams, Neal (2003). Terrorism & Oil. Tulsa: PennWell.
5
Haspeslagh, Philippe C. and Jemison, David B. (1991). Managing Acquisitions:
Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal. New York: The Free Press.
6
Hoffman, Thomas. (2003, March 10). Top Execs Demand Data Now. Computerworld. p.
1, 16.
7
Verton, Dan. (2003, March 10). Tight IT Budgets Impair Planning As War Looms.
Computerworld. p. 1, 53.
8
Gong, Jiong and Srinagesh, Padmanabhan. (1997). The Economics of Layered
Networks. In Internet Economics, Edited by Lee W. McKnight and Joseph P. Bailey.
Cambridge: The MIT Press. p. 69.
9
Shemwell, Scott M. (2002, February). Economic Theory Supports E-Business Model.
Author.
10
_______. (2002, December). Disruptive Technologies – Out of the Box. Author.
11
The Business Roundtable. (2002, May). Principles of Corporate Governance: A White
Paper. p. iv. http://www.brtable.org/pdf/704.pdf
12
Millstein, Ira M. (1994, February 25). Distinguishing “Ownership” and “Control” in the
1990s. Proceedings of the ISS Conference. Appendix 7.
http://www.thecorporatelibrary.com/cgii/cgd07.htm
13
DiPiazza, Samuel A. and Eccles, Robert G. (2002). Building Public Trust: The Future of
Corporate Reporting. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14
(1996) Quiet Revolution: Information Technology and the Reshaping of the Oil and Gas
Business. Cambridge: CERA.
15
Holland, Winford E. “Dutch.” (2000). Change is the Rule. Chicago: Dearborn.
16
Hofstede, Geert. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London:
McGraw-Hill.
17
Economides, Michael and Oligney, Ronald. (2000). The Color of Oil: The History, the
Money and the Politics of the World’s Biggest Business. Katy: Round Oak Publishing.
18
Raymond, Lee. (2003, February 11). Opening Address. CERA Week 2003.