the connected universe

formulaecollection

keywords:
Holofractographic (Holo- Fractal) Physics, Geometric Physics Solutions, Unified Field Theory, Replacing the Strong Force, t he
Electric Universe Theory, Einsteins General Relativity, Fractal, Field, holographic, symmetry, Golden Mean, fibonacci, Standard Model, brief summary, new, charge radius of
the proton, relationship, matter, specific, harmonic, interference patterns, quantum, vacuum, fluctuations, proton, surface, holographic principle, information, surface, area
,Planck units, Einsteins Field Equations (General Relativity), vacuum energy density , Proton to electron mass ratio, replacing the strong force, new exact radii of elements,
frequencies, photosynthesis, visualizing, space-time, dynamics, Fractal mathematics, information theory, ,infinite compression, precisely phase conjugate, implosive collapse,
golden mean, addition and multiplication, waves, self-similarity (fractality), optimized, planck length, time, feedback ,information exchange, scales, nature, micro, macro,
Quantum physicists, boundaries , membranes, harmonics, imagery, Gravitational Control, Gravity, Proton, Electron, Mass, Formulas, mathematical equations formulaic,
formula

Description
In this PDF we will concentrate on the simplicity of the approach. We will show
equations of the connected universe film. Using a basic geometric and information
theory approach, assuming a constant density of the vacuum.
Advanced: We will solve for the black hole mass-radius relationship, the proton mass,
the proton radius puzzle, and present a few new precise equations for the proton to
electron mass ratio and Avogadros constant, and examine some Phi-ratio and
Planck unit discoveries.
All this is done without any free parameters (arbitrary numerical values) or hidden
variables, unlike the Standard Model and the QCD model for confinement which utilize
between 18 or 19 free parameters (and 7 more if neutrinos are considered).
Furthermore, after decades of super-computer analysis and experimental studies (such
as at the Large Hadron Collider) there is still no satisfactory solution to confinement or
the source of mass for particles.
We do consciously not use the words: singularity or black hole because we now have much better
definitions of whatever we meant using those words (fussily) in the past.

We now call: boundary conditions with specific geometric harmonic resonance ratios.

holo
the holographic ratio relationship of quantum vacuum
fluctuations
with zero free parameters or hidden variables
new vacuum energy density allow for more exact
assumptions at the quantum and at cosmological scale

use the new definition: to identify source of mass for the proton / matter
use the new gravitational- to-strong force coupling constant
use the new proton to electron mass ratio
use the new charge radius of the proton
use the new more exact radii of elements

what we call matter

is the hologram:
the (specific harmonic) interference patterns
of quantum vacuum fluctuations
on the proton surface.
All calculations are done using spherical Plank voxels
(volume pixel)

fracto
fractal mathematics teaches us: the geometry of infinite
compression
precisely phase conjugate implosive collapse: because the
principle of the golden mean allow for the addition and
multiplication of any kind of waves.
use golden ratio-self-similarity optimized
use exact phase conjugation, coherent fractal fields
now predict + control gravitic, electromagnetic fields

graphic
Obviously many animals and plants exploit symmetrical shapes from a molecular level
up. Simply because symmetry is part of the language of nature.The idea of symmetry
is vital in all science because it works at all scales. Fundamental particles, Elements,
Molecules, Membranes, DNA, Tornados, Solar Systems, Galaxies, all Energy
Dynamic, Fields and equations (e.g. E= +/- mc) are all expression of symmetry
(spin).

All boundary conditions with specific geometric harmonic resonance ratios.

Matter on all scales is spinning b

ecause the space that defines the matter
is spinning itself.
It is the continuous process of space-time implosion and expansion that
produces the forces of gravity and electromagnetism. As space-time curls
towards singularity it approaches the speed of light, generating enormous
centrifugal forces, which in turn causes expansion.
The expansion of space-time is eventually overpowered by the curvature
of spacetime and contracts back towards the singularity again, keeping the
process in perpetual motion.
The gravitational field is generated as space-time curls towards the
singularity in the center of the system and electromagnetic spectrum is
produced when the centrifugal forces of spin at the event horizon (which
are close to the speed of light near the singularity), cause it to expand and
radiate.

Va

What problems can we address with the

Holographic approach? Using Planck units we have a way simpler approach than Einsteins Field
Equations (General Relativity), yet gives more exact answers: These new vacuum energy density
assumptions allow for calculating e.g. the Proton to electron mass ratio, replacing the strong force, no
more need for dark energy, new more exact radii of elements,
With addition of torque and spin into Einsteins field equations there is a much more coherent model that
unifies the forces of spin, electromagnetism and gravity using the most foundational topology of spacetime
on all scales.
use exact phase conjugation to predict brainwave frequencies.

cuum Energy: where does the resultant energy come from?

It is the continuous process of space-time implosion and expansion that produces the forces of
gravity and electromagnetism. Golden ratio phase conjugation is fractality in all wave
mechanics.You may understand with the help of geometry / symmetry of resonance =
harmonics.

The holographic ratio relationship of quantum vacuum fluctuations (QVF) has been found to
predict the charge radius of the proton with more precision than has ever been achieved
before.
Matter on all scales is spinning because the space that defines the matter is spinning itself. It is
the continuous process of space-time implosion and expansion that produces the forces of
gravity and electromagnetism. As space-time curls towards singularity it approaches the speed
of light, generating enormous centrifugal forces, which in turn causes expansion. The
expansion of space-time is eventually overpowered by the curvature of spacetime and
contracts back towards the singularity again, keeping the process in perpetual motion.
The gravitational field is generated as space-time curls towards the singularity in the center of
the system and electromagnetic spectrum is produced when the centrifugal forces of spin at
the event horizon (which are close to the speed of light near the singularity), cause it to expand
and radiate.

Lets start at the NEW basics

formulaic collection of planck units and relations

Planck Mass
=

ml =

c
G

Planck Length

l=
if the plank was the
scale of a grain of
sand ...

G
c

Planck Time

tp =

G
c5

Density of the vacuum of space (space-time)

Density is mass per volume = M
V
where M is mass, V is volume
96
6
=M
kg/ m3
V = = 9.84568467 10

l = =
is the reduced Plancks
constant =
h
2

c is speed of light
G is the universal
gravitational constant
PSU:
Sphere of diameter L
Where L is Planck Length.
Therefore, Length.
Therefore radius = L2

Dvacuum =

ml
V ls

Volume PSU
= V ls = 43 r3

rc
ml = 2G

holographic mass and quantum gravity approach

These results are derived from first principles and classical considerations alone, with zero
free parameters or hidden variables, and extend our generalized holographic solution to
generate a complete picture of confinement whether at the quantum scale or the
cosmological scale of black holes. All this is done without any free parameters (arbitrary
numerical values) or hidden variables, unlike the Standard Model and the QCD model for
confinement which utilize between 18 or 19 free parameters (and 7 more if neutrinos are
considered). Furthermore, after decades of super-computer analysis and experimental studies
(such as at the Large Hadron Collider) there is still no satisfactory solution to confinement or
the source of mass for particles. Harameins result finally gives us a comprehensive, unified
and fundamental understanding of the source of the natural world and the forces that rule it.

Resolves the ~122 orders of magnitude discrepancy between the cosmological

constant (universal density or dark energy) and the Planck quantum vacuum density
Describes the cosmological scale gravitational force as a product of discrete Planck
quantities making up the structure of spacetime
Identifies the source of mass for the proton which makes up matter
Resolves the hierarchy problem between the proton mass, the Planck mass, and the
gravitational force
Finds the gravitational-to-strong force coupling constant
Identifies the source of energy and mass and the mechanism from which the speed of
light is defined in the famous energy mass equivalence equation
Calculates the angular frequency and period of a holographic proton resulting in the
interaction time of the strong force
Demonstrates utilizing special relativity that gravity can behave with the range typically
associated with the strong force giving the first analytical solution to confinement and
unifying gravity with the quantum world.

There are many more implications and ramifications to our current physics from these solutions
that cannot be elaborated on here.

THE CONFINING FORCE

Another of the mysteries of Modern Physics is the origin of the strong force, also known as
the nuclear force or confining force. As we discussed in Module 3, the strong force was
developed to explain the incredible strength of the bond between nucleons (protons and

neutrons) which is strong enough to overcome the electrostatic repelling force in the nucleus of
an atom. Since there was no solution for quantum gravity, and in general, gravitation was
thought to be extremely weak at small scales, an entirely new force in physics was needed to
explain this powerful bond. However, as we have come to understand black holes in more
depth, it is clear that gravity can in fact be extremely strong in the vicinity of a black hole.
In this section, we will explore how the generalized holographic mass solution generates a
gravitational force strong enough to equal the nuclear confining force, as well as reconciles
how a proton could have the large mass necessary to produce this gravitational field.

Vacuum Energy, Continued

history: Aether*, bio-crystalline superfluid fabric of space-time
1cc is 38 orders of magnitude more mass than the mass of the entire
observable universe ( 1053 kg, W
ikilink)
Implies there is WAY more mass in space than that required for creation of black holes and
wormholes; space (space-time) may be full of microtubule wormholes; we are already
wormhole connected
From this assumption, answers to physics questions can be derived

Link to Geometry and the Phi Ratio

Tetrahedron is fundamental
building block
Platonic solids
Phi ratio in nature due to the
natural growth building of
structure
Phi , the golden ration, 1+5
2 is found in relating the
Cartesian coordinates of the Platonic solids the new
equation: = n has been found to fit many natural
phenomena and relationships. In large part this is due
to the Isotropic Vector Matrix (IVM) nature of the fabric
of space-time. The IVM is the only matrix that allows
for and equal and opposite force.
L, is the Planck Length.

Electricity is created b
y rotation and
cross-rotation of the electromagnetic
field (vortex / spining) and this field
works from one place to another. It is
based on Tetra / octa / cube symmetries because those would
generate maximum interference
pattern and hence these matrices
produce maximum charge isolation (this
disharmony produces movement...)
Whereas pent / deca - dodeca / icosa produce symmetries and implosive
centripetal compression and thus
maximum charge inclusion (gravity,
synchronicity, singularity).
Eggsample:

The voltage generated by a fresh egg or

a pine cone (apparently from the gravity
field by being a fractal attractor for weak
capacitance)- is a sustainable biologic
source of energy. An Egg and the pine
cone are excellent examples of because
as biological capacitors they implode
charge making life. They are made of
biologic dialectric (self-similar at atomic
and molecular symmetry levels)

Link to Phi Ratio,continued..

N
= _ Golden Ratio

Y earOrbit tl N
Venus Year, = 240
365.25 days (Earth year) divided by PHI gives the days cycle of Venus (225.7).
Wavelength of Light for Photosynthesis
= l N
l =Planck length
Violet (=427nm)
N=136
Green (550nm)
Non-integer N136.5
Red (=691nm)
N=137

What is Mass? -The Problems

This is the main question CERN LHC is attempting
to answer with the Higgs boson.
Richard Feynmans quotes: WikiLink:
You can't say A is made of B or vice versa. All mass is interaction.

 why are the masses of the various particles such as quarks what they are? All
these numbers have no explanations in these string theories absolutely none!...
paraphrased: someday, possibly, equations will be found for these masses, in simple
fundamental physical constants and geometric ratios
Impossible to read all scientific publications, How to keep up?
Focus on unsolved physics problems:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics
Mass is information, a vibration in and through the fabric of space-time
The importance is: understanding mass gives us more of an idea of the behavior of nature.
It also presents a way to think about how matter and energy in space behave:
Black-(w)hole dual-toroidal space-time dynamics
While this is out of the scope of this lecture, it is worthwhile to investigate further
Ordinarily, =
Example: How much mass is 1 liter of water? (at 3.98C)
1 1000 1 = 1000 = 1
What is Mass? -The Solutions
The relationship between the inside and the outside defines the energy of a galaxy, a sun,
microtubules.... This works on all scales of the universe.
On the proton scale: The Radius of the proton is the boundary condition, a specific harmonic
relationship. It is the inside plank oscillations meeting the outside plank / vacuum oscillations.

All information of the whole universe is fundamental to this encoding procedure.

What we call material reality is the hologram: the interference patterns of the quantum fluctuations
of spacetime on the proton.

What problems can we address with the Holographic approach of Haramein?

 The proton mass is a dynamic energetic vibration in the vacuum

Proton information is exchanged with the immense density of the vacuum
Proton essentially blinks into and out of the vacuum at a Planck time rate

Where:
e is the elementary charge;
Proton to Electron Mass Ratio Supports the new solution is correct!
= 0.841236 is required for derived equations to agree with ALREADY established mass
measurements!
Clearly proves equations are correct
No other equations exist or have been derived until now for the proton to electron mass ratio
many papers written attempting
Requires completely new whole thinking approach
Isolated, reductionist approach is incomplete

Relates Six (6) Fundamental Physical

Constants

= =

= .
The fine structure constant and the Rydberg constant are among the most accurately
measured physical constants
Can be re-written as a new (possibly expensive) way to calculate
=
2

0.841236 for these well known constants to work
Implies a geometrical relationship significant new approach ADDS to previous mainstream
approach works with it, does not replace it

2

=

Squared error from vs. proton radius
k=
pi(rp )=

MpRp=4LM=ReMe and Torque

Everything spins
Torque equation
=
=
=

Replacing the Strong Force

In QCD, Yukawa potentials are used in strong force calculations. These Yukawa potentials are
curve-fitted to help with empirical analysis. Haramein used a relativistic approach to derive
Hence from the generalized holographic the energy, angular frequency, and period for such a
system utilizing our holographic approach geometric relations of Planck entities, we have and

find that the frequency is the characteristic gamma frequency of the nucleon and the period
derived clear quantum gravitational massis on the order of the interaction time of particle decay
via the strong force. Finally, we calculate energy formulations that define the
the mass dilation due to velocity as a function of radius and plot the resulting gravitational
characteristics of the strong nuclear force, such potential range. We find the range to be a
close correlation to the Yukawa potential typically as the energies to produce it from
gravitational utilized to illustrate the sharp drop-off of the confining force. Refer to *, section 5.
coupling and its interaction time. *
Equations:
Force Between Two Masses & Charges
Force due to gravity between 2 masses
=
1 2
2
; Newton's law of universal gravitation, modern form
Force due to electric charge between 2 charges
=
1 2
2
; Coulomb's law
Note form of equations are the same inverse square distance
How can it be shown that the equation for gravitational force can be
G = Gravitational constant
derived from the electromagnetic force? (TBD)
1
;
40
m = mass
q = charge
r = distance
=

Implications
New worldview: Connected, whole view,
Energy generation
Gravitational control
Space-time defines objects
Cyclical

Different way of relating to environment

Restore Earths ecology
Consider all life
For the benefit of all to the advantage of none
Different Way of Thinking Requires great courage to go against status quo
This is simply the beginning of a whole new conceptual way ofthinking of science

the power of now physiks

"Consciousness: The Way Out of Pain"[edit]
Chapter three: "Moving Deeply Into the Now"
Chapter four: "Mind Strategies for Avoiding the Now"[edit]

Researchers at HIUP publish scientific papers layman papers and articles.

The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution

Haramein, N & Val Baker, A. K. F. (2016). The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution, A
TINER 4th International
Conference of Physics: Abstract Book, Page 14

Download the PDF

A computation of the electron mass is found utilizing a generalized holographic mass solution in terms of quantum
electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations. The solution gives a clear insight into the structure of the hydrogen Bohr atom,

in terms of the electron cloud and its relationship to the proton and the Planck scale vacuum fluctuations. Our
electron mass derivation is accurate to within 0.000000002 x 10-28 g (99.99999998%) of the CODATA value. As a
result, an elucidation of the source of the fine structure constant, the Rydberg constant, and the proton-to-electron
mass ratio is determined to be in terms of vacuum energy interacting at the Planck scale.

The Unified Spacememory Network: from cosmogenesis to consciousness

Haramein, N., Brown W., & Val Baker, A. K. F. (2016). The Unified Spacememory Network: from cosmogenesis to
consciousness, Journal of Neuroquantology, preprint.

Download the PDF

The recent developments of advanced models of unified physics have brought a deeper understanding of the
fundamental nature of space, time, energy and matter. It is becoming apparent that information and geometry are
primary to explaining these fundamental agents. In previous work, we demonstrated that the subatomic nucleon
structure of the proton and recently the electron can be derived directly from a spacetime holographic structure of
Planck-scale quantum vacuum oscillators fluctuating as spacetime pixels, demonstrating that spacetime at the very
fine level of the Planck-scale is discrete with information quanta. We have found that when considering the granular
spacetime information-energy structure from which we demonstrate matter and mass arises, the phenomena of
self-organizing systems that leads to self-awareness and consciousness is integral to and a natural emergent
property of the feedback-dynamics of spacetime information itself. In this work, we describe how the integral
function of the information feedback dynamics of spacetime, which engender mass-energy, is the missing element
in understanding the evolution and development of self-organizing physical systems in general, and the emergence
of the biological organism in particular. We evaluate non-classical quantum mechanical phenomena of physical and
biological systems in light of the Maldacena-Susskind holographic correspondence theorem from which an
equivalence of wormhole spacetime geometry and quantum entanglement is derived. We suggest that the
Planck-scale micro-wormhole entanglement structure of multiple spacetime coordinates engender the
macromolecular assemblies of living cells, and that this wormhole entanglement may function in the memory and
learning capacity of the biological entity. Furthermore, the recursive information encoding feedback processes of the
quantum spacetime micro-wormhole network, which we refer to as spacememory, enables memory and learning in
physical systems across all scales, resulting in universal evolutionary tendencies towards higher levels of ordering
and complexity foundational to evolution, sentience, and awareness.

Addendum to Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass in View of the 2013 Muonic
Proton Charge Radius Measurement.
Haramein, N. (2013). Addendum to Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass in view of the 2013 Muonic Proton
Charge Radius Measurement, Hawaii Institute for Unified Physics

Download the PDF

We consider the latest results of the measurement of the charge radius of the proton utilizing laser spectroscopy of
muonic hydrogen published in Science on January 25, 2013 by an international team lead by Aldo Antognini and
carried out at the Paul Scherrer Institute Proton Accelerator. Given the new charge radius measurement, we
compute the proton mass utilizing our generalized holographic approach and find that our result is now within
0.00072 10-24gm of the 2010-CODATA value of the proton rest mass. Our predicted charge radius is now within
0.00036 10-13 cm and remains within one standard deviation of the new measurement.

Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass

Haramein, N. (2012). Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, Physical Review & Research International, ISSN:
2231-1815, Page 270-292

Download the PDF

We find an exact quantized expression of the Schwarzschild solution to Einsteins field equations utilizing spherical
Planck units in a generalized holographic approach. We consider vacuum fluctuations within volumes as well as on
horizon surfaces, generating a discrete spacetime quantization and a novel quantized approach to gravitation. When
applied at the quantum scale, utilizing the charge radius of the proton, we find values for the rest mass of the proton
within 0.06910-24gm of the CODATA value and when the 2010 muonic proton charge radius measurement is
utilized we find a deviation of 0.00110-24gm from the proton rest mass. We identify a fundamental mass ratio
between the vacuum oscillations on the surface horizon and the oscillations within the volume of a proton and find a
solution for the gravitational coupling constant to the strong interaction. We derive the energy, angular frequency,
and period for such a system and determine its gravitational potential considering mass dilation. We find the force
range to be closely correlated with the Yukawa potential typically utilized to illustrate the exponential drop-off of the
confining force. Zero free parameters or hidden variables are utilized.
Keywords : Quantum gravity; holographic principle; Schwarzschild solution; proton charge radius; strong interaction;
Yukawa potential.

The Schwarzschild Proton

Haramein, N. (2010). The schwarzschild proton, AIP Conference Proceedings, CP 1303, ISBN 978-0-7354-0858-6, pp.
95-100.

Download the PDF

This manuscript received a Best Paper Award in the field of Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory,
and Gravitation at CASYS09 (Computing Anticipatory Systems) in Belgium.
Abstract: We review our model of a proton that obeys the Schwarzschild condition. We find that only a very small
percentage (~10-39%) of the vacuum fluctuations available within a proton volume need be cohered and converted
to mass-energy in order for the proton to meet the Schwarzschild condition. This proportion is equivalent to that
between gravitation and the strong force where gravitation is thought to be ~10-38to 10-40 weaker than the strong
force. Gravitational attraction between two contiguous Schwarzschild protons can accommodate both nucleon and
quark confinement. We calculate that two contiguous Schwarzschild protons would rotate at c and have a period of
10-23s and a frequency of 1022 Hz which is characteristic of the strong force interaction time and a close
approximation of the gamma emission typically associated with nuclear decay. We include a scaling law and find
that the Schwarzschild proton data point lies near the least squares trend line for organized matter. Using a
semi-classical model, we find that a proton charge orbiting at a proton radius at c generates a good approximation to
the measured anomalous magnetic moment.

Scale Unification A Universal Scaling Law for Organized Matter

Haramein, N., Rauscher, E.A., and Hyson, M. (2008). Scale unification: a universal scaling law. P
roceedings of the Unified
Theories Conference. ISBN 9780967868776

Download the PDF

Abstract: From observational data and our theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that a scaling law can be written for
all organized matter utilizing the Schwarzschild condition, describing cosmological to sub-atomic structures. Of
interest are solutions involving torque and Coriolis effects in the field equations. Significant observations have led to
theoretical and experimental advancement describing systems undergoing gravitational collapse, including vacuum
interactions. The universality of this scaling law suggests an underlying polarizable structured vacuum of mini white
holes/black holes. We briefly discuss the manner in which this structured vacuum can be described in terms of
resolution of scale analogous to a fractal-like scaling as a means of renormalization at the Planck distance. Finally,
we describe a new horizon we term the spin horizon which is defined as a result of a spacetime torque producing
boundary conditions in a magnetohydrodynamic structure.

Spinors, Twistors, Quaternions, and the Spacetime Torus Topology

Rauscher, E.A., and Haramein, N., (2007). Spinors, twistors, quaternions, and the spacetime torus topology,
International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, 1373-5411.

Download the PDF

Abstract: The dual torus topology occupies a central role in the spinor, twistor and quaternionic formulation. This
topology appears to be ubiquitous in astrophysical and cosmological phenomena and is predicted by the U4 bubble
of the affine connection in this solution to Einsteins field equations. The geometric structure of the complexified
Minkowski space is associated with the twistor algebra, spinor calculus, and the SUn groups of the quaternionic
formalism. Hence quantum theory and relativity are related mathematically through the dual torus topology. Utilizing
the spinor approach, electromagnetic and gravitational metrics are mappable to the twistor algebra, which
corresponds to the complexified Minkowski space. Quaternion transformations relate to spin and rotation
corresponding to the twistor analysis.

Collective Coherent Oscillation Plasma Modes in Surrounding Media of Black Holes and
Vacuum Structure Quantum Processes with Considerations of Spacetime Torque and
Coriolis Forces
Haramein, N., Rauscher, E. A. (2005). Collective coherent oscillation plasma modes in surrounding media of black holes
and vacuum structure- quantum processes with considerations of spacetime torque and coriolis forces. Orinda: Beyond
The Standard Model: Searching for Unity in Physics, 279-331.

Download the PDF

Abstract: The main forces driving black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, quasars, and supernovae dynamics have
certain commonality to the mechanisms of less tumultuous systems such as galaxies, stellar and planetary
dynamics. They involve gravity, electromagnetic, and single and collective particle processes. We examine the
collective coherent structures of plasma and their interactions with the vacuum. In this paper we present a balance
equation and, in particular, the balance between extremely collapsing gravitational systems and their surrounding
energetic plasma media. Of particular interest is the dynamics of the plasma media, the structure of the vacuum,
and the coupling of electromagnetic and gravitational forces with the inclusion of torque and Coriolis phenomena as
described by the Haramein-Rauscher solution to Einsteins field equations. The exotic nature of complex black holes
involves not only the black hole itself but the surrounding plasma media. The main forces involved are intense
gravitational collapsing forces, powerful electromagnetic fields, charge, and spin angular momentum. We find soliton
or magneto-acoustic plasma solutions to the relativistic Vlasov equations solved in the vicinity of black hole
ergospheres. Collective phonon or plasmon states of plasma fields are given. We utilize the Hamiltonian formalism
to describe the collective states of matter and the dynamic processes within plasma allowing us to deduce a
possible polarized vacuum structure and a unified physics.

The Origin of Spin: A Consideration of Torque and Coriolis Forces in Einsteins Field
Equations and Grand Unification Theory
Haramein, N., and Rauscher, E. A. (2005). The origin of spin: A consideration of torque and coriolis forces in Einsteins
field equations and grand unification theory. Beyond The Standard Model: Searching for Unity in Physics, 1, 153-168.

Download the PDF

Abstract: We address the nature of torque and the Coriolis forces as dynamic properties of the spacetime metric and
the stress-energy tensor. The inclusion of torque and Coriolis effects in Einsteins field equations may lead to
significant advancements in describing novae and supernovae structures, galactic formations, their center
supermassive black holes, polar jets, accretion disks, spiral arms, galactic halo formations and advancements in
unification theory as demonstrated in section five. We formulate these additional torque and Coriolis forces terms to
amend Einsteins field equations and solve for a modified Kerr-Newman metric. Lorentz invariance conditions are
reconciled by utilizing a modified metrical space, which is not the usual Minkowski space, but the U 4 space. This
space is a consequence of the Coriolis force acting as a secondary effect generated from the torque terms. The
equivalence principle is preserved using an unsymmetric affine connection. Further, the U 1 Weyl gauge is
associated with the electromagnetic field, where the U4 space is four copies of U1. Thus, the form of metric
generates the dual torus as two copies of U1 x U1, which we demonstrate through the S3 spherical space, is related
to the SU2 group and other Lie groups. Hence, the S4 octahedral group and the cuboctahedron group of the GUT
(Grand Unification Theory) may be related to our U 4 space in which we formulate solutions to Einsteins field
equations with the inclusion of torque and Coriolis forces.

A QUANTIZED SOLUTION FOR GRAVITY

Already present in modern physics, and elaborated upon in the last module, the Holographic
Principle is defined as the capacity for information storage on the surface of the event horizon
of a black hole, where one bit of information is equal to one Planck area, which defines the
entropy (heat or temperature) of the black hole.
Remember from Module 3:
Gerard t Hooft coined the term holographic principle, and described the event horizon of a
black hole similar to pixels on a computer screen, which display the information contained
within. His work was generally a response to Stephen Hawkings surprising discovery that
black holes must radiateHawking radiation presented the world of physics with what is
commonly known as the black hole information paradox.
In Hawkings theory (which applied Bekensteins bound), quantum information must be
destroyed by a black hole. Gerard t Hooft and Leonard Susskind presented an alternative
idea, that the information of both energy going into a black hole and being radiated from it was
fully recorded on the event horizon. t Hooft showed that there could be bump-like
impressions on the event horizon of a black hole where incoming and outgoing radiation were

exchanging information
Haramein generalized this principle by first redefining the Planck area bit (or pixel) as a Planck
Spherical Unit (PSU) of volume (a quantum voxel), since it is more plausible that the Universe
tiles with spherical units rather than with two-dimensional squares, or with three-dimensional
cubes for that matter. (Pun intended.)
He further demonstrates that there is a simple and fundamental relationship between the
information content, in terms of PSUs inside the volume of a black hole, and the PSU
information on the surface event horizon, giving a ratio that when multiplied by the Planck
mass (the energy of that ratio), generates the exact mass-energy of the black hole. The
Schwarzschild solution to Einsteins field equations gives the exact same answer for the mass
of a black hole, however, in the case of Harameins generalized holographic solution using
quantum voxels, we have a quantized gravitational solution (in fine-grained or discrete
quantities). Since we find the granularity of spacetime to be a Planck, a quantum object, we
have quantum gravity as opposed to the smooth surface of Einsteins curvature. This
reconciles quantum mechanics with General Relativity by demonstrating that the source of
gravitation, which is currently unknown in standard theory, is the electromagnetic vacuum
fluctuations of the quantum information network (the curvature of spacetime describes the
mechanics but does not identify what spacetime is made of). Another big problem in physics
is resolved!
Tiling a Sphere with Square Units of Area Fails
Important Reminder: You cannot tile a sphere with square units of area seamlessly.
Triangulated Tiling of an Event Horizon - Scientific American
The artist in this Scientific American article used more correct sphere tiling, since space-filling
intersecting spheres have the independent space of an equilateral triangle when their equators
are mapped on a surface.
Deeper Dive: Quantized solution for the holographic mass of a black hole (click to expand)

Remarkably, in 1973 Buckminster Fuller was already blazing the path for this solution when he
stated:2
Omnitriangulated geodesic spheres consisting exclusively of three-way interacting great

circles are realizations of gravitational field patterns The gravitational field will ultimately be
disclosed as ultra high-frequency tensegrity geodesic spheres. Nothing else.
- Buckminster Fuller
Now it has been disclosed!
Haramein points out in his paper,
It then follows that the Schwarzschild solution to Einsteins field equations could have been
developed in the late 19th Century by computation of tiling Planck quantities independent of
spacetime curvature and singularities, near the time when Max Planck derived his units in
1899.
Had this discovery been made two decades prior to general relativity of 1916, many difficulties
in understanding the source of gravity and mass may have been avoided. Haramein further
states,
Therefore, in the case of the generalized holographic solution, the difficulties associated with
discontinuities and singularity production are precluded from occurring due to the Planck
quantization where the presence of (h-bar), the quantum of angular momentum or the
quantum of action of the energetic vacuum, quantized spacetime and yields a discrete
gravitational mass or quantum gravity.
Visualize yourself in a bathtub with a little rubber duck floating in the water. When you pull the
plug, a gradient differential between the air in the drain and the density of the water generates
an exchange of pressure and a rotating structure of co-moving water molecules in that region,
that can be seen as a little vortex. If the rubber ducky is far from the vortex, it will have little
influence upon it, however, when the rubber ducky enters regions where the particles of water
are accelerating in a coherent fashion it will begin moving in an orbital path and appear to be
gravitationally attracted towards the center of the vortex. The difference between Harameins
solution and General Relativity is that Einstein described the surface of the water curving
towards the drain, while Haramein describes the particles that make up the water in the first
place, and thus the source of the surface curvature, which is a secondary effect resulting from
the water spinning.Visualize yourself in a bath (naked), with your little rubber duckie (or
whoever)...
Clearly if this was truly quantum gravity, the same approach should work to calculate gravity at
any scale, including the quantum scale. Lets have a look

THE HOLOGRAPHIC NETWORK OF SPACETIME

We have demonstrated that the source of the material world emerges from a fundamental field
of information memory on the structure of space, where every little Planck vortex oscillator
represents a bit of information in the evolution of a universe. Now lets put the pieces together
between the cosmological scale and the quantum scale and visualize the structure in which our
lives are embedded.
We start with the awareness that the holographic mass-energy value of all of the protons in the
universe, ~1055 grams, is present in terms of information in the vacuum fluctuations inside a
single proton.
Imagine a hard drive with the music of an orchestra on it. The information that makes up the
music fits on a very small region of the magnetic media, while of course, the instruments and
the people that make up the orchestra are not actually on the hard drive. Now imagine that the
music that is on the hard drive is continuously being updated as the orchestra performs that
is, the music is changing. The media would then be required to be continuously connected to
the orchestra (like a network in sync) so that it can constantly update its information to
represent what is being played. Just like the media of a hard drive, where the information is
embedded in the magnetic medium electromagnetically, the electromagnetic structure of the
quantum vacuum energy holographically encodes information at the Planck bit scale inside of
each proton, what we can call spacememory. Just like the interference pattern that records
the image information on a holographic plate, all the information of all other protons is
holographically recorded inside each and every individual proton.
Additional Resources
ARTICLE: Seth Lloyd, Professor of Quantum Mechanical Engineering at MIT discusses the
possibility that the Universe is a computer storing data in atoms or molecules. Read the Article.
PAPER: Computational capacity of the Universe

In the Pythagorean concept of Musica Universalis, or music of the spheres, he proposed that
there were specific harmonic intervals between planets, the Earth, and the stars.
This holographic encoding of the universal symphony might be called, in honor of the
Pythagorean schools, the music of the spheres.
there is geometry in the humming of the strings; there is music in the spacing of the spheres.
- Pythagoras
Everything is continuously changing in the universe though, so just as our hard drive needs a
network connection to stay current with the music that is being played by the orchestra, so too
does the proton need to be connected to a network of information pathways so that any
changes locally are continuously updating all other points across all spans of spacememory in
the universe in order to self-organize! How would the universe do that?
When we take Wheelers model of vacuum dynamics, described as a sea of turbulent and
extremely energetic fluctuations generating Planck scale wormholes, and apply Harameins
holographic mass solution, we can start imagining how the Planck quantum vacuum wormhole
network connects all things. In technical terms, the entire universal structure is entangled in
order to update all localized points and self-organize in a coherent and unified manner.

ENTANGLEMENT
Entanglement is a well known property of the quantum world. And now, more and more
experiments are demonstrating that the macro world of daily objects can as well exhibit
entanglement properties which were previously thought to be reserved only to the quantum
scale of particles. For instance, recently diamonds have been shown to be successfully
entangled.1 Einstein called it spooky action at a distance and eventually it was confirmed
experimentally that particles can change state in relationship to each other almost
instantaneously when one particle state is changed, no matter what the distance between the
two, even if one of them is on the other side of the universe. Recently some of the most
prominent physicists in the world have come to conclude that this entanglement is actually the
result of wormholes connecting black holes and particles across the universe.2,3,4,5,6

Additional Resource

ARTICLE: Wormhole entanglement solves black hole paradox. Read the

article on New Scientist.

When we calculate the rest mass of the proton, we are observing the local frame, which could
be described as the effect the single proton has on the rest of the information network of the
Universe. When we invert the equation and calculate the holographic mass of the proton, we
account for the non-local information networks relationship to each proton through
entanglement, where the mass-energy information of the entire Universe is represented
holographically across all protons in the network.
Imagine the surface horizon of the proton treated with Harameins holographic solution, in
which each Planck unit on the surface (there are ~1040 Planck on the surface of one proton) is
the termination of a tiny Planck-scale vortex wormhole that is connected to (and thus entangled
with) another Planck on another protons surface. Then imagine that each of the ~1040
wormhole Planck terminations of one proton is connected to a different proton, like network
cables connecting one proton with ~1040others in the rest of the universe. Of course, each of
these ~1040protons are themselves connected to another ~1040 protons, which results in
~1080 connected protons, which is the estimated number of protons in the universe today. A
new picture emerges wherein the Planck vacuum structure generates a fractal network of
wormholes where the proton volume is an information hub and the surface is the through-put
capacity of the hub to communicate with other protons.
Now the Planck information within the volume of all protons in the universe is unified and
shared across ~1040 connections on each proton. The result is that all the information of all
protons is present in the volume Planck information of one proton. From what we learned from
Harameins holographic solution, the mass of the object is the result of the information within
the volume (~1060 Plancks in each proton) communicating across the boundary through
~1040 connections to all other protons. The difference between the two, what Haramein
describes as a fundamental universal ratio (which he defines with the greek-letter most
commonly used for physical ratios, phi ) is the mass-energy-information of the Planck
Spherical Units inside that do not have access to a Planck wormhole termination on the
surface, adding up to the rest mass of the proton (~10-20):

The surface to volume ratio gives its rest mass of approximately 10-20. This is a direct
reflection of the limit of information capable of crossing the event horizon or charge radius of
the proton.
In simple terms, there is a larger number of Plancks in the volume than the number of
Planck wormhole terminations on the surface, thus only a certain amount of
information-energy remains expressed locally and that amount of information-energy
happens to equal the mass of the proton.
Additional Resource
ARTICLE: Phenomena like this supermassive quasar cluster suggest there may be major
problems with current mathematical descriptions of the Universe. Biggest Thing in Universe
FoundDefies Scientific Theory. R
ead the article on National Geographic.
One could think of it as all the outgoing information inside trying to transmit through the event
horizon, and encountering a resistance or entropy since there is more information within the
volume than the surface can transmit, which leaves a local mass-energy equivalent to the
mass of the proton. Yet, when we examine all the other protons acting on one, or the incoming
information, then the strong confinement mass-energy value is found for the proton to proton
interaction, almost as a pressure exerted by the information of all other protons communicating
with the one:

Since this is true for cosmological objects as well, then the mass and the confining force of
gravity from the nuclei of atoms to universal structures, such as galaxies and stars, are the

result of the impedance of the universal information network across event horizons the
network singing across scales the music of the spheres.
It is important to remember that these are highly dynamic fluctuating connections which may
disconnect and reconnect at a very high rate (Planck time is ~10-44 seconds). A good visual
for this is a plasma ball toy you can buy that has a hub in the center with plasma discharges
fluctuating and arcing to the glass orb around it. Therefore, while two particles may disentangle
(in technical terms, decohere due to the network structure of the wormholes), the information
always has a path to inform the whole. This information network is fractal across all scales as
well, with larger black holes larger hubs that connect the network, so that there is the
proton scale connected by the Planck wormholes, and then the stellar black hole scale, the
supermassive black hole galactic center scale, and so on.
Lets return to our analogy that the universe is a symphony orchestra, where every proton is
like the magnetic medium of a holographic hard-drive recording every moment of its existence
in Planck bits. Each proton hard-drive is then connected through wormholes that act like
network cables with instantaneous transmission, resulting in all the protons in the universe
being synchronized in a superconductive cloud network that updates instantly with every
change. One might imagine that the structure of spacetime around each proton is a beautiful
lattice of interconnected spheres with transmission channels traveling in all directions. You
could also see it as bucky-domes or geodesic spheres concentrically surrounding each proton.
While the proton spins, its surface network intersects, attaching and detaching with harmonic
nodes or aligned passages in the surrounding network, allowing it to engage with pulses of
information through the standing wave wormhole network that crisscrosses the entire Universe.
This standing-wave network is the vacuum energy fluctuations, an omnidirectional medium
made of light itself, which we quantize as this lattice of Plancks that completely fill all
apparently empty space.

A quick calculation will show that the black hole surface event horizon of our universe,
determined in size by its mass (which is all the protons in it), happens to have a one-to-one
relationship with the surface of all protons. That is, if one calculates all the Planck wormhole
terminations present on all protons (approximately 1080 protons each with ~1040 Planck
terminations), it adds up to ~10120 Planck bits, which is exactly the number of Plancks that can
be tiled on the surface event horizon of the black hole universe. This literally warrants the
appellation of a Black Whole coined by Haramein in 1997 in a presentation at the Sequoia
Symposium.
As you may have explored in an earlier section, Seth Lloyd of MIT computed that the
Universes gravitational energy (or what we call Harameins quantum vacuum fluctuations),
could have performed 10120operations so far.1

1. Lloyd, S. 2001. Computational Capacity of the Universe. Retrieved from:

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110141

FUNDAMENTAL HARMONICS OF THE PLANCK

SCALE
From the holographic mass analysis and the unified physics network concept, very specific
fundamental relationships become apparent.
There are ~1040 Plancks on the surface of a proton. Interestingly, the difference between the
radius of the universe of ~1027 to ~1028 cm and the radius of the proton at ~10-13 cm also
turns out to be ~1040 to ~1041 (1027/10-13=1040). Also as we have seen, the difference
between the holographic mass of the proton ~1014g and its rest mass ~10-24g (which we
might also define as the difference between the strong force and the gravitational force) is
~1039. In addition, the difference between the holographic mass of a proton and the mass of
the universe at ~1055g is ~1041. It is extremely significant that each of these differences are
within one or two orders of magnitude from 1040. Therefore, there is a very strong and obvious
correlation between the micro world of the proton and universal scale structures and forces that
seem to be defined in the large number of 1040. This may in fact be a result of the fundamental
ratio found through Harameins equations (for which he uses the greek letter Phi ).
1. The scaling from the Planck mass ~10-5g to the proton rest mass ~10-24g or
Harameins fundamental ratio PHI: 1/1020
2. The scaling between the proton rest mass ~10-24g and its Schwarzschild holographic
mass ~1014g which is ~1038 or the number of Planck on the surface of a proton
~1040,
3. The ~1040 scaling between the holographic mass of the proton ~1014g and the mass
of the universe ~1055g which is the mass resulting from the number of Plancks inside
the volume of the proton ~1060,
4. The scaling from the rest mass of the proton ~10-24g to the mass of the universe
~1055g or the number of protons in the universe ~1080,
5. The scaling between the Planck mass and the proton rest mass multiplied by the
number of protons in the universe or the number of Plancks in the volume of a proton
multiplied by the number of Plancks on the surface of the proton ~10100,
6. The number of Plancks on the surfaces of a proton ~1040 multiplied by the number of
protons in the universe ~1080 equals ~10120 which is the number of Plancks on the
surface of the horizon of our universe as well,
7. The number of Plancks inside one proton ~1060 multiplied by the number of protons in
the universe ~1080 equaling ~10140
8. the number of Planck in the volume of our universe ~10180
9. and so on

Looking at the exponent of the above numbers, one can quickly see that there is a pattern of
growth ratio that obeys an exponential growth of 1020 or Harameins fundamental ratio. There
is clearly an exponent harmonic relationship between scales, and these relationships define
the structure, the masses, and the forces of our reality. How could this be completely missed
over some 150 years of modern physics? Well, in fact, it wasnt missed by everybody. A few of
the most prominent physicists in the history of science noticed, one of them being Paul Adrien
Maurice Dirac.

THE LARGE NUMBER HYPOTHESIS

A dimensionless number is a number that does not depend on what system of units you use.
For example, the ratio of masses between fundamental objects or Harameins surface to
volume ratio gives a number that is dimensionless, meaning that it has no centimeters, grams,
seconds, or any other units attached to it.
Such numbers are thought of as units of nature and some physicists have been intrigued with
them and their recurrence, especially the large dimensionless numbers whose coincidence
was first mentioned by Weyl (1917)1 and later by Eddington (1931, 1936, 1946)2,3,4 and Dirac
(1937).5 Weyl began by comparing the radius of an electron to the radius of a hypothetical
particle whose electrostatic energy was equal to that of an electrons gravitational energy
(which is basically the ratio of an electrostatic force of an electron to the gravitational force of
an electron), and found it to be the large number of ~1042. He thus speculated that the
observed radius of the universe (ro) might also be the hypothetical radius of a particle whose
rest energy is equal to the gravitational self-energy of the electron i.e. ro/re ~ 1042, which is 2
orders of magnitude bigger than the observed ratio of 1040 (Stewart, 1931).6 Further
developments by Eddington (1931) showed that the exact number of protons in the universe, N
~1078, is equal to the square of Weyls ratio.

Hermann Weyl, a contemporary of Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein and Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington were also colleagues, and a BBC
documentary was made about their relationship.

Following on from the work of Weyl and Eddington, Dirac showed that the ratio of the electric
force and the gravitational force between the electron and the proton was of the order of 1039.
Interestingly, the age of the Universe, determined by
measuring the recessional velocity of galaxies and given
in terms of atomic units, is also 1039. In 1937 Dirac
proposed the Large Number Hypothesis and stated that
this coincidence could be understood if fundamental
constants, such as the Newtonian gravitational constant,
G, were in fact variable and proportional to the age of the
Universe. He hoped that, although the effect would be
very small, future observations would be able to check
this variation. However, if it was found to be varying, then
this would affect Einsteins theory of relativity which
demands that G should be constant.
The concept of varying G is similar to the work of Milne who, although not inspired by the large
number hypothesis, explored the idea in response to what he saw as the limitations of the
general theory of relativity (Milne, 1935).7 However Diracs theory differed from Milnes theory
and also proposed continuous matter creation.
The relationship between the number of particles in the Universe and Weyls ratio showed that
the number of particles in the Universe should be increasing proportionally to the square of the
age of the universe and therefore matter must be continually created. Steady state cosmology
previously suggested such a concept, but with a constant G as opposed to Dirac and his
variable G.

Paul Dirac proposed the Large Numbers Hypothesis and suggested that the age of the
universe may affect fundamental constants. He also proposed continuous matter creation.
In a recent paper (2011),8 Haramein resolves this by suggesting that it is the vacuum energy
density, that he demonstrates generates mass and the gravitational field, that is changing

across scales during cosmological evolution, not the gravitational constant G itself. He shows
that the energy density decreases with the increasing size of the Universe, so although the
number of particles in the Universe is increasing, with continuous matter creation the
energy/information is conserved.
In any case, the recurrence of these large numbers should NOT be ignored. Sadly, they have
been for decades, which is remarkable when you consider that some of the brightest and
greatest physicists very deliberately pointed to their importance. Listen to one of the rare
recordings of Paul Dirac. Here he discusses the significance of the Large Number Hypothesis:
Additional Resources
VIDEO (left): Paul Dirac discusses the Large Number Hypothesis. (9.16)ARTICLE: The
following interview with Paul Dirac was conducted by David Peat (DP) and Paul Buckley (PB)
in the early 1970s for broadcast as part of a CBC radio documentary series entitled Physics
and Beyond. Read the interview transcription.
Since the time of Dirac and Eddington the discovery of other large number coincidences has
only increased. However, according to Funckhouser (2006),9 the large number hypothesis can
be resolved by reducing the terms that constitute the large number coincidence to three
irreducible numbers. The following three large pure numbers of order ~ 1040, still remain:

where mo is the mass of the observable universe, mn is the mass of the proton, and mp is the
mass of the Planck.
After having explored the holographic mass solution, these relationships are familiar as they
engender the source of mass and gravity both at the cosmological level and the quantum level.
Therefore, the relationship between the Planck mass, the proton mass, and the mass of the
universe are no longer a mystery (as in the hierarchy problem) as they are all defined by the
fundamental bit size of the Planck entity of our holographic spacetime/spacememory structure.
These harmonic relationships certainly imply that there must be sub-planckian oscillators that
make up the Planck itself, and so on to infinity. Yet now, and most importantly, we understand
the dimensional relationship (the scale relationship) between them, being set by the
fundamental measuring stick ratio (~1020), underlying the mechanism that produces masses

and forces making up our experience of the material world around us (and not some
mysterious value that keeps recurring).
1. Bell, J. L. & Kort, H. 2015. Hermann Weyl. Retrieved from:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weyl/
2. Eddington, A.S. 1930. Preliminary Note on the Masses of the Electron, the Proton, and
the Universe. Retrieved from:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1733360&fil
eId=S0305004100009269
3. Ryckman, T. A. 2014. Early Philosophical Interpretations of General Relativity.
Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/genrel-early/
4. Durham, I. T. 2006. Fundamental Theory. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0603146
5. Dirac, P. A. M. 1937. The Cosmological Constants. Retrieved from:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v139/n3512/abs/139323a0.html
6. Gorelik, G. 2002. Hermann Weyl and Large Numbers in Relativistic Cosmology .
Retrieved from: http://people.bu.edu/gorelik/ES_GG_Large_Numbers.pdf
7. Krogdahl, W. S. N.d. A Critique of General Relativity. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0711/0711.1145.pdf
8. Haramein, N. 2011. The Cosmological Constant and the Schwarzschild Proton.
Retieved from: http://haramein.resonance.is/wp-content/uploads/SP.pdf
9. Funkhouser, S. N.d. A New Large-Number Coincidence and a Scaling Law for the
Cosmological Constant. Retrieved from:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0611/0611115.pdf

COSMOGENESIS
The mass and forces of our universe emerge from a vacuum energy medium composed of
Planck Spherical Units, which produce a holographic structure with very specific ratio
relationships, and a dynamic wormhole-like network connecting all points across scales,
generating a Connected Universe. Of course, such a universe implies the existence of
feedforwardand feedback loops of information across the entire network structure. This
resolves some of the most significant problems in current theory which, as we have seen in the
Rubiks cube example of Module 1, cannot explain the occurrence of highly complex
self-organizing systems through random functions. Even the most simple iterations of biological
structure and molecular assemblies demand extremely specific circumstances and universal
values in order to occur.
In their 2014 paper entitled The Unified Spacememory Network: from Cosmogenesis to
Consciousness,1 William Brown, Dr. Amira Val Baker, and Haramein, utilize the generalized
holographic principle and the wormhole network to describe the occurrence of biological
structures and the event of cognitive function in the brain by means of non-local interactions of

the microtubule structure of the brain with the vacuum Planck fluctuations. In calculating the
probability of the most simple building blocks of biological structures, they write:
The evolutionary pathway of the DNA-mRNA-tRNA/rRNA transcription and translation system,
which is the information system at the heart of all biology, emphasizes the gap in the
description between the observed extant complexity and the putative processes that would
have fostered, or even driven, the emergence of such complexity. Consider again the
ribozyme. The ribozyme represents the possible link in the chemical evolution between
information encoding molecules and catalytic enzymes. Small ribozymes would have been the
primordial precursors of the ribosomal RNA, the holoenzyme of which is perhaps one of the
most complex molecular structures that we know of, and is one of the three fundamental pillars
of the molecular biological processes underlying all living organisms (the other two being the
DNA molecule, and the DNA/RNA polymerase machinery). There are over 100 naturally
occurring nucleosides (generated by modifying the 4 canonical ribonucleosides) that make up
the rRNA molecule.2 If each position of the rRNA subunits were to be tested with each of the
100 possible nucleosides, then with a length of 4448 nucleotides in some species,3 there are
1004448 different possible configurations that is 1.0 X 108896 possible first order
configurations. The hyperastronomical number of possible configurations to evolve from
demonstrates the rationale behind positing that there could be an underlying mechanism
producing purposeful innovations, and attracting towards higher levels of structural ordering
and functionality.

Class I Ligase Ribozyme Wikimedia

In this image, you can see the complexity of the process from DNA (left) through RNA
transcription (center) and Protein synthesis (right).

Chaos to Order Image Remix by Adam Apollo

The probability of our world existing today under random functions is extremely low to
non-existent. Yet with feedback in a connected holographic structure, evolution would occur
very rapidly as systems are updating evolutionary paths from the environmental feedback

across scales. Self-organization, in that case, is not only inevitable but fundamental to the
system.
With this in mind, we can now regard the universal network system as a learning structure in
which each point is learning from the whole, and in turn, the whole is informing each point. In
such an information web which notably resembles the neuronal structure of the brain, the
systems evolutionary learning process must be recorded as a memory input in the structure of
spacetime, and therefore the holographic surface which is recording the information, must
expand.

In other words, the expansion of the universe could be directly related to the evolution of a
self-organizing holographic surface which is necessary to accommodate its learning. This leads
to a continuous creation model of the universe, instead of the typical one shot big-bang.

GRAVITY AT THE QUANTUM SCALE

One of the most significant outstanding problems in physics has been the question of whether
the same force that we call gravity at the large cosmological scale is also at play at the
quantum atomic scale. Although various attempts have been made to describe quantum
gravity, Haramein eventually derived a solution that not only makes clear that it is indeed the
same force that binds the nucleus of an atom, but that there is also an important dynamic
relationship between the holographic mass inside a proton and the universal mass outside of it,
e.g. all other protons that make up the universe.
In order to achieve a quantum scale solution for gravity, Haramein eventually realized that the
volume-to-surface ratio of Plancks (as we might call the Planck Spherical Units) in his

holographic cosmological (large scale) gravitational solution (which we covered in the previous
topic) must be inverted at the quantum scale, so that the surface information content is divided
by the amount of Planck information within the volume (in terms of PSUs) to define the
standard mass of the proton. The result in his first order approximation is extremely compelling.
Indeed, the surface-to-volume Planck ratio, when multiplied by the Planck mass to get the
energy of the ratio, generates a mass for the proton:

This is within 0.069 X 10-24 g of the experimentally measured value. It is important to note
here that Haramein initiates this calculation by using the proton charge radius 2010 CODATA
value (Committee for Data on Science and Technology, which is the standard for all
fundamental values in the scientific community). As well, you may notice an extra factor of 2
in front of the equation which is common in physics.
One of the most remarkable things about this solution, both at the cosmological level, but even
more prominently at the quantum level, is the fact that such incredibly large numbers like the
mass of the Universe at 1055 g, generated from R=1.280404 X 1060 Plancks, and the number
of Plancks on the surface of the proton =4.716551 X 1040, would together give an almost
exact value (and we will see that it actually may be the exact value) for the mass of an object
such as a tiny proton with a mass of 10-24g. The probability of such large numbers randomly
producing results with such accuracy is almost non-existent.We will cover more about this in
detail later in this module in the section about the Large Numbers Hypothesis.

:::

:::

Lets look at this from another perspective. In the cosmological (large scale) quantized
Schwarzschild solution, the internal volume Planck-scale information for an object like a black
hole is divided by the information present on the surface of the event horizon in terms of the
number of PSUs, or Plancks. Then in order to achieve the standard mass solution to the proton
at the quantum level, the surface area (from the charge radius) is divided into the internal
information (or volume of the proton).

However, as we discussed earlier the internal mass information value for the Plancks present
inside the proton is equivalent to the mass of the entire visible Universe (all other protons
combined), that is ~1055 g. Therefore, since the information outside the proton (all other
protons that make up 1055 g) is holographically present inside the proton, the equation is
inverted reflecting the influence of one proton on all other protons in the Universe, which is
really small. In later sections, we will see that the uninverted ratio of the quantized
cosmological solution is applied to the proton to generate the correct gravitational force to
confine the protons in the nucleus which in this case, represents all the other protons in the
universe influencing the one.
The equivalence between the total mass of all protons in the Universe and the holographic
Planck volume mass within each individual proton being equal to the universal mass is what
allows for the event horizon of a proton to have extreme stability across vast expanses of time
and environment.

Lets restate these calculations in simple terms: when calculating the gravity of a cosmological
black hole, we take its total volume of mass-energy and divide that by its surface (charge
radius or event horizon). This tells us how much of an effect the inside information of the object
(a relative amount) has on the outside spacetime (the rest of the universe), which is its gravity.
When calculating the gravity (or mass) of a proton, we invert this and take the outside
information on the surface that we perceive (the relative amount), and divide it by the inside
volume (the universal or holographic amount). The proton has the special property of having an
internal vacuum fluctuation mass-energy equal to the mass of the visible Universe. Therefore,
were taking our perceived view of a single instance of a proton (by the size of its charge radius
in Plancks), and dividing it by the internal volume in Plancks (which is a direct holographic
reflection of the Universal mass-energy). This allows us to understand its individual
mass-energy or gravity in relationship to all other protons in the universe.

Haramein defines this surface-to-volume or volume-to-surface Planck ratio as a fundamental

ratio in the physics of our universe and utilizes the Greek letter Phi (often used in physics to
designate ratios, and not to be confused with the golden ratio) to identify it.
From Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, this ratio is derived as:

or the inverse

Consequently acts as a fundamental constant relating the background Planck vacuum

fluctuation field to the cosmological and quantum scale where it may be the source of

confinement so that scaling from the proton rest mass to the Planck mass requires a
proportional mass-energy conversion of 2 while from the Planck mass to the holographic
gravitational mass requires a factor of
- Nassim Haramein
Eventually when Haramein expands the algebra derivations of the ratio he finds that 42 is
equivalent to the gravitational coupling constant!3 This is the relative strength that the
gravitational force would be in order to confine the protons against the electrostatic repulsion
force resulting from their charge.
This is a remarkable result!
Here we arrive at the very critical cornerstone of Harameins conjecture, initiated with The
Schwarzschild Proton paper:
The confining force that protons experience in the nuclei of an atom (the so-called
strong force or strong interaction) is equivalent to the gravitational force energy that two
protons would experience if they were tiny black holes attracting each other.

THE GRAVITATIONAL COUPLING CONSTANT

In The Schwarzschild Proton paper, the calculations to derive the gravitational force of a proton
generated from its Planck information structure were somewhat loosely made as a first order
approximation utilizing the Compton length of the proton, instead of a precise charge radius.
As weve seen in Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, Haramein predicts an extremely
accurate charge radius for the proton utilizing a fundamental vacuum energy information ratio
, and was able to compute the gravitational coupling constant or the strength of the strong
force from 42. However, when Haramein utilized the current measured proton radius (2010
CODATA value), the value for the force is a little bit off from the standard calculated value.
When he then utilized his predicted radius in these same calculations (calculated force value
from the predicted radius: 42=5.90574 x 10-39), the gravitational coupling constant or the
gravitational force of a proton generated from its Planck information structure is not
approximately equivalent to the gravitational coupling constant, but EXACTLY equivalent (the
standard gravitational coupling constant: g=5.90574 x 10-39).
Harameins result for the gravitational force of a proton based on his predicted proton radius:
42=5.90574 x 10-39
The standard gravitational coupling constant:
g=5.90574 x 10-39
This has two very significant meanings:
1. That the predicted radius of the proton must be correct, and precisely accurate.
2. That the strong force is actually gravity at the Planck level produced by vacuum energy
fluctuations.
This means that the confining force of nucleons must be the result of the discrete information
granulate structure of spacetime at the quantum scale. This in turn produces a gravitational

component equivalent to the event horizon of a proton black hole with the exact radius
predicted (and now experimentally confirmed). In his technical paper, Haramein describes the
energy of the vacuum fluctuations of the horizon of the proton generating the gravitational
coupling constant as the unifying energy. He writes:
Hence the gravitational force coupling constant is computed directly from the geometric
relationship of the Planck oscillator surface tiling to the interior volume oscillations of the
proton. This clearly relates the Planck mass to the proton rest mass, and the 22 ratio of the
proton mass to the holographic gravitational mass or the Schwarzschild mass. Consequently,
the unifying energy required for confinement is generated by holographic derivations directly
from first principles of simple geometric Planck vacuum fluctuation relationships. Furthermore,
the rest mass of the proton is computed without requiring the complexities introduced by a
Higgs mechanism, which also utilizes a non-zero vacuum expectation value, but which only
predicts 1 to 5 percent of the mass of baryons [the proton], and in which the Higgs particle
mass itself is a free parameter.1 The standard theory to describe the strong confining
interactions is called the Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics (LQCD). The LQCD accounts for
the remaining mass of the proton by utilizing special relativity to determine the kinetic back
reaction of the massless gluons when they interact with the confining color field. Yet it is critical
to note that after almost a century of computation, there is still no analytical solution to the
Lattice QCD model for confinement Since there is no analytical solution to LQCD and no
framework for the energy source necessary for confinement, associating the remaining mass of
the proton to the kinetic energy of massless gluons is based on tenuous tenets [to say the
least!]. Our results demonstrate that the holographic gravitational mass-energy of the proton
mh is the unification energy scale for hadronic confinement and that the mass of nucleons is a
direct consequence of vacuum fluctuations.
Lets return to our bath and our rubber ducky. The picture that emerges from Harameins model
is that the structure of space is quantized by tiny Planck voxel spheres that are like the water
molecules in our bath analogy. This next part is very important to remember: the rubber ducky,
when far away from a gradient depression of the drain, is not very much attracted by the
curvature of the vortex because the surface is almost flat. This is because the molecules of
water far from the drain are not moving very fast and are not being so coherent. The rubber
ducky, being far from the drain, is having an experience equivalent to the gravitational fields we
experience in the macro world of cosmology, where gravity appears to be very weak.

When a rubber ducky is far from a vortex (or gradient depression from a massive object),
gravity seems weak. Image adapted from The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene.
When a rubber ducky nears a vortex, gravity is strong, angular momentum increases, as well
as energy.
Yet when the rubber ducky approaches closer to the
depression of the highly curved surface near the drain,
where the water molecules are co-moving in a very
coherent manner, then the rubber ducky is much more
attracted and its angular velocity is increased
dramatically. This is equivalent to the highly curved
structure at the pinpoint center of an atom we call a
proton.
Here, something extremely significant becomes
apparent, and addresses one of the largest enigmatic
problems in physics: If the vacuum energy in the
space is so dense, why is the universe not completely
compressed into the size of a walnut as a result of the
large gravitational impact of such a high vacuum
density? From this picture, we now understand that the universe IS indeed highly curved and
the points in which that high curvature occurs are what we call protons or, if you like, the
material world.

ENERGY AND SPIN OF A PROTON

As is well known, the energy of a proton can be calculated using the simple equation E=mc2.
Of course, it would look a little more like Ep=mpc2 where the mp is the mass of the proton and
Ep is its energy, so that the energy is derived from the mass of the proton. Having
demonstrated that the proton is essentially an agglomeration of Planck-scale electromagnetic
fluctuations, one could imagine that these energy dynamics would be a representation of the
bulk rotation of all the tiny Plancks together, just like the energy of the water vortex generated
by the drain of our bath could be calculated in terms of all the water molecules bulk rotation
within the co-moving region.
Of course, now that the mass of the proton has been identified to be the result of the
co-moving Planck Spherical Units (PSU), Haramein converts Einsteins mass-energy
equivalence to an expression that includes the fundamental geometric universal Planck surface
to volume information ratio .
Why would we convert Einsteins equation E=mc2?
If we examine the mass-energy equivalence expression E=mc2, we find that none of the terms
are defined. The source of mass, in the standard model, has not been defined or is unknown
(notwithstanding the Higgs mechanism that is unsuccessful in predicting a large percentage of

proton mass). And although precisely measured in a laboratory, the mechanism that
determines why the value of the speed of light is some 300,000km/second, is generally
unknown.

Einsteins elegant equation is basically a brilliant equivalence between three predominantly

undefined terms.

The source of mass in co-moving planck oscillations.

Faculty Note
For ease of reading these equations, just note that mp refers to the mass (m) of the proton
(lowercase subscript p), and that Ep is the energy of the proton. Also, ml and El refer to the
mass and energy of the Planck (subscript l).
By replacing m by the universal ratio , Haramein essentially defines the source of mass in the
mass-energy equivalence equation, and as a result defines the source of E as the Planck
quantum vacuum electromagnetic oscillations. Therefore, he is able to write:
Of course, 2ml is equal to the mass of the proton mp so that:

is equal to:

Clearly, the new mass-energy equivalence expression demonstrates that both m and E are a
direct consequence of the Planck vacuum energy. This is present in Ep=2mc2 since the
energy of a Planck is equal to E=mc2. Therefore, for the first time, the source of mass and
energy in the Einstein mass-energy equivalence formula is defined as resulting from the Planck
oscillators in the vacuum structure.
So what about c, the speed of light? What is the mechanism that determines its value?

Exploring the algebra of Ep=2mc2, Haramein decomposes the Planck energy E=mc2
which can also be given in terms of the Plancks constant (h-bar) and the Newtonian
gravitational constant G, in this square root expression:

and eventually arrives at:

For a full derivation of the algebra see Quantum Gravity and the
Holographic Massequations (59) and (60).

To understand the deeper meaning of the energy of a proton being equivalent to four times
(h-bar), times the speed of light, divided by the proton radius:
You may recall from Module 3 that Max Planck resolved the black body ultraviolet catastrophe
by determining that the electromagnetic radiation of a body occurs in discrete packets of
energy proportional to their frequency. This proportionality constant is typically given as h
(Plancks constant) where the energy E of the packet is equivalent to h multiplied by the
frequency (the greek letter nu) or E=h.
Initially Planck thought that all he was doing was fudging the equations by the value of
h=6.626070 x 10-34 J/s (Joules per second) in order to make everything come out right for the
radiation of a black body. After all, when you add energy to a system or heat up something it
seems to rise in temperature in a continuous and smooth fashion, not in some kind of integers.
The concept at the time seemed extremely radical. However, the integers are so tiny that the
energy events appear continuous. Similarly, although spacetime appears continuous and
smooth at the macro-scale, Harameins paper demonstrates that it is granular at the tiny level
of the Planck-scale.

Max Planck, the inadvertent father of quantum theory, and the brilliant mind behind the
Planck-scale constants that form the basis for Unified Physics.

Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, the minds behind relativity, the atom, and much of
quantum mechanics, and whose contributions are essential to the field of Unified
Physics.
In 1905, Einstein in his seminal work on the photoelectric effect ultimately described the
packets of energy of the electromagnetic field as photons, and eventually Niels Bohr in 1913
utilized those concepts demonstrating that the orbitals of electrons jump from one discrete
integer energy state to another as they absorb or emit the little packets of energy in keeping
with Plancks constant, making the value h fundamental to the birth of quantum theory.
It then follows that in quantum mechanics even the angular momentum (rotational momentum)
of an electron bound to a nucleus is quantized and is typically described as a quantum of
action. This quantization of angular momentum is commonly calculated in terms of radians per
second or angular frequency (the number of cycles it goes around per second or Hertz)
which is multiplied by the frequency or =2. As a result for convenience sake, a reduced
Planck constant was established, denoted by (h-bar), where:

 (h-bar) describes the angular momentum quantum of action of quantum mechanics. In other
words, it defines a fundamental unit of rotational action.
Haramein then thought that maybe if he replaced the in the equation

with its full expression

then the meaning of Ep in this equation, which expresses the energy of a proton, may be made
clearer. Maybe the holographic solution of the energy of the proton was describing its angular
momentum the rotation of a proton.
Therefore, Haramein replaced (h-bar) in the equation with its full expression of h/2 which
resulted in:

Here the meaning becomes fully apparent. The denominator in this equation 2rp is the
circumference (C) of a circle (C=2r), in this case a circle with the radius of a proton (rp), and
the c above is how fast its going around that circle (at the speed of light).
Nassim Haramein uncovers the secret of the spin of the proton, and brings together the
fundamental elements necessary for an effective foundation in Unified Physics.
Therefore, all this was indicating that the energy of a proton is a direct consequence of the
angular momentum (the spin) which we now know is the bulk rotation of all the little Plancks in
that region of space.
From this equation, Haramein is then able to calculate the angular frequency of a proton in
Hertz (how many times the proton is going around in a second).

Remarkably, this is the characteristic frequency of the gamma ray emissions of nuclei,1here
derived directly from a discrete quantum of action of angular momentum and extrapolated from
geometry.

But more importantly, Haramein goes on to find the value of the period of such a system, that
is the amount of time it takes for the proton to go around once, and finds:

And this happens to be the typical interaction time given for the strong force, or how fast the
strong force will capture a particle or the time by which a particle orbit approaching the nuclei
will decay via the strong interaction. This is an incredible result!

On the far right of the light spectrum we can see that gamma ray emissions are typically
associated with the nuclei of atoms at frequencies above 1020 Hz. Credit: NASA

Gamma Decay from an Atomic Nucleus

A UNIFIED VIEW EMERGES

Now that we have covered the fundamental elements of Harameins solution to quantum
gravity and the foundations for Unified Physics, lets review the basic picture being painted by
this solution and some of the problems it solves.
Our holographic, geometric description of the dynamics of spacetime uses a fundamental
information bit, what we call a Planck, a spherical unit at the scale of the smallest wavelength
of the electromagnetic spectrum. All structures in space, from the proton to the cosmological
black hole, can be seen as a spinning field of co-moving and oscillating Plancks. Through
simply calculating the ratio relationships between the number of Plancks on the event horizon
or charge radius (surface) of any object to the number of Plancks in the volume of the object,
we can actually generate a solution to gravitational mass for cosmological objects (equivalent
to the Newtonian limit of Einstein field equations, the Schwarzschild solution), and also apply it
at the quantum level to extrapolate the standard mass of the proton.
In addition, were able to predict the proton radius with extreme accuracy, output a gravitational
coupling constant for the strong force, therefore removing the need for one of the four
fundamental forces in physics by unifying it with Gravity. We also establish the angular
frequency of the system and the interaction time of the confinement of that force.
In summary, by examining the dynamics and structure of the vacuum energy at the Planck
scale, we are now able to identify the source of mass (the proton makes up most of the mass
in the universe), compute cosmological gravitation, demonstrate that the strong force is
actually gravitation acting at the quantum scale holding the nucleons together with the correct
range, and for the first time give an analytical solution to nuclear confinement.
By using a theoretical model based upon natural (Planck) units and simple geometric
relationships, a unified solution emerges that is able to answer the biggest questions in physics
today with accuracy and elegance.

Spin is generated by a change in density in space.

temperature gradient causing formation
Many implications emerge from these discoveries.
For instance, until now the source of gravitation
was unknown. Due to Einsteins work, it is
generally seen as the result of spacetime
curvature, but no description was available to
define spacetime itself and its composition. Now it
becomes clear that spacetime is like a sea of
discrete, tiny eddies or vortices composed of
spherical Planck oscillators spinning coherently into

larger structures. These spinning coherent patterns occur simply due to a change in density
gradient in the vacuum from universal size to quantum size, and where there are eddies there
is curvature or gravitational forces. For visualization purposes, remember our rubber ducky
bath analogy, where Einstein described the water curving towards the drain and Haramein
described the spinning dynamics of the co-moving particles of the water (spacetime) that
produces the curvature in the first place.
You can see this every day in Earths atmosphere, in which slight changes in the temperature
gradient (also based on density) create wind storms and even massively coherent spinning
vortices that form hurricanes and tornadoes.
Therefore, we can now demonstrate that these eddies, composed of co-moving tiny Planck
scale spinning oscillators, are the source of mass (the proton) for all matter in the universe.
Protons themselves, as subatomic particles that make up the nuclei of atoms, stick together
because these tiny Planck eddies collectively produce a gravitational force which is extremely
strong very close to the charge radius or event horizon of the proton (the strong force), which
literally holds the nuclei together in other words, holding together what we call matter and
the universe as a whole.
So now when we look at E=mc2, we can identify that E and m are the result of vacuum
fluctuations and that the speed of light (c) is derived from the Planck vacuum spinning at that
velocity at the horizon of the proton. The base of reality, what makes up our material world all
around us, is becoming clearly defined. Energy and mass are no longer unknown mystical
entities, but they are clearly the result of the information vacuum fluctuation dynamics self
organizing at different scales, from the center of galaxies to the center nucleus of an atom. A
unified view emerges!

replace the strong force

connect to vacuum energy and control gravity

GRAVITATIONAL FALLOFF AND THE YUKAWA

POTENTIAL
Before screaming eureka! there is one order of business that cannot be ignored. If the strong
force is actually the force of gravity acting at the nucleus level of an atom, why then is its range
so short? The cosmological gravitational fields we experience everyday drop off at a square of
the distance, in accord with Newtons law. Yet in the bond between nucleons (protons), the
strength of the confining nuclear force drops
off much more rapidly. We know from
knocking protons out of a nucleus (using
particle accelerator scattering) that it is fairly

easy to do so. If the strength of the strong force was to be a gravitational force, then one would
have to explain why the strength does not drop off at the square of the distance from the
proton, but almost instantaneously as you move away from the edge (or charge radius) of each
proton which is typically given by a curve fitting graph of approximated values called the
Yukawa Potential.

Haramein knew that for his approach to be considered, this would have to be elucidated, and in
The Schwarzschild Proton paper he had already laid down the foundation to resolve this
mystery. Haramein reasoned that if we are now giving an analytical classical solution to
nuclear confinement, utilizing the quantum structure of the vacuum to generate the classical
force of gravity utilized in general relativity, then the spinning dynamics of this structure (the
proton) would be subject to special relativity and mass-dilation.
From Einsteins special relativity we know that an object undergoes a mass-dilation (mass
increase) when accelerated near the speed of light. Here we have a proton made out of vast
numbers of little Planck oscillators all spinning together at the speed of light or very close to it.
Yet, as we move away from the surface event horizon of the co-moving Plancks that make up
the proton, Haramein reasoned that the velocity would diminish very rapidly, and if it did, then

the mass-dilation would drop very rapidly too. If the mass dropped, so would the gravitational
force.

So although gravity would have a force that drops at a square of the distance, if the velocity
(from the little Plancks co-moving) dropped exponentially with the distance, which produces the
mass-dilation and thus the gravity, then the gravitational force would drop extremely fast as
well. He went on to calculate how quickly gravity would drop off as the velocity reduced with
the distance from the surface charge radius of the proton rotating at the speed of light
(effectively moving the rubber ducky away from the drain). Remarkably, he found that this
matched the experimental result of the standard range given to the strong confining force,
which is typically given as the Yukawa potential.
We can reflect on what we learned in Module 3 about Einsteins theory of Special Relativity:
when an object accelerates to nearly the speed of light, it gains an incredible amount of
mass-energy, and likewise when it decelerates from that speed, it loses a huge amount of
mass-energy.
Lets go back to our rubber ducky in the bath analogy. Of course if the rubber ducky is far from
the drain, it will orbit very slowly, but as it gets closer its orbital velocity will increase rapidly as
it enters the more coherent co-moving water particles that makes up the vortex created by the
gradient of the air-water exchange in the drain. Now imagine that the rubber ducky sped up to
near the speed of light as it approached the drain. The mass increase would have an
equivalence in the gravitational force that the rubber ducky imposes on its environment.
Therefore, if the rubber ducky was moved away from the drain and its velocity reduced, the
gravitational force that they exert upon each other would drop very rapidly because the
mass-dilation of the rubber ducky would drop as well.
When far from the whirlpool, the ducky experiences little movement. In this video clip, imagine
the vortex increasing the ducks speed to near the speed of light. When you ride an elevator,
roller coaster, or merry-go-round, notice how your weight increases when you accelerate in a
new direction. Your mass continues to dilate as your speed increases
In this short clip from Harameins ADC presentation, you can see what a stable orbital pair of
protons might be like.
Haramein calculated that if two protons are orbiting each other, the amount of mass-dilation
they would experience if they were orbiting very close to the speed of light (c) would be
equivalent to the mass of a black hole or the Schwarzschild condition for a proton. This is
congruent with his earlier calculation showing that the gravitational coupling constant or the
amount of energy necessary for gravity to become the strong force (what Haramein calls the
unifying energy) is the relationship between the standard mass of the proton and its black
hole holographic mass. Now we see that the rest mass of the proton is measured when it is at
rest, not accounting for light speed acceleration in the nucleus and the mass-dilation that
comes with it.

Haramein finalized his calculations in his paper Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass.
Having proved that the angular momentum of the holographic proton is the speed of light from
his calculation of the energy, he went on to calculate the drop in velocity (or v(r), velocity vs.
radius or v of r) as the protons moved away from each other (the rubber ducky moving away
from the drain), and the drop in mass-dilation resulting from the reduction in velocity. He found
that the drop off is extraordinarily rapid.
That is, if you move one proton away from another proton only by the incredibly miniscule
value of a single Planck length, there is already a reduction in mass of some 28 orders of
magnitude (28 zeroes on the mass number). Therefore, the mass and gravitational attraction of
the force drops exponentially, in fact asymptotically as you move the protons away from each
other.
He plotted this on a graph and the result speaks for itself: It is almost a perfect match to the so
called Yukawa Potential, which itself is only an approximation of the range of the strong force.
This provides an analytical classical solution to the strong force gravity acting at the
quantum scale where systems have relativistic velocities or light speed velocities.

On the right is the typical curve-fitting graph given as the Yukawa potential to describe the
range of the strong force. On the left is Harameins calculation of the drop in gravitational force
as the mass-dilation diminishes when two protons are moved apart from each other. It is easy
to see that the two graphs agree with each other and that Harameins result defines a precise
constraint on how that force should act, which matches the experimental findings.
Showing that gravity could have a range similar to the strong force was the last part that
Haramein had to prove in order to clearly demonstrate that the strong force is in fact gravitys
influence at the quantum level and that all of it is the result of the Planck vacuum
electromagnetic fluctuations of spacetime acting at all scales.
This is yet another remarkable result of the quantized holographic approach!

History

There are many old arts / sciences / pragmatics: e.g. yoga, martial arts... through which you
might get consciousness of self awareness; this would be EXPERIENCING zero-point energy,
getting conscious of interconnectedness of all forces (e.g. in different body parts, the hole body
...as a fractal mirror of your outside surrounding).
In all those arts it's about being totally "venerable" in the sense of really totally accepting (in the
sense of emphatically embedding/ integrating) all forces... even attention (consciousness) as
an coherent energy vector embedding...

Casimir Effect and Dynamical Casimir Effect

(Supports existence of vacuum energy)

Metal plates block outside waves, net
inward pushing on plates
Experimental proof
Vacuum fluctuation energy exists!
Microwave RF photons can be vibrated
out of vacuum A rapidly moving mirror
that turns virtual photons into real ones
is the first experimental evidence of the
dynamical Casimir effect.
From:

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424111/first-observation-of-the-dynamicalcasimir-effect/

"Casimir plates" by Emok - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Casimir_plates.svg#/media/File:Casimir_plates.svg
In the Casimir effect, two neutrally charged metallic plates are placed extremely close together
in a vacuum (a chamber devoid of atmospheric molecules). Because some of the
electromagnetic wavelengths of the quantum vacuum will not fit in between the extremely small
space in between the metallic plates, they will cancel out. This results in a slightly lower energy
in between the plates, almost like a low pressure region, and the greater energy around the
area from the more numerous electromagnetic modes will push the plates together.
This is a highly important effect as it not only verifies the pervasive presence of the
electromagnetic oscillations of the vacuum, but is a direct demonstration of extracting energy
from it because a force is produced from the quantum vacuum simply by canceling some of

the vacuum fluctuations (electromagnetic modes) in a defined region of space. Note that this is
a type of gravitational effect (the plates gravitate together), and hence has been suggested to
be a mechanism by which gravitational control can be achieved.
In more recent research, this phenomenon has been extended to the d
ynamical Casimir effect,
in which microwave photons are emitted directly from the vacuum. The electromagnetic waves
of the vacuum are described equally precisely as photons. Each photon has a partner that acts
as an anti-particle, forming particle anti-particle pairs that cause the photons to stay bound to
the vacuum state. However, if a mirror is moved at relativistic speeds (speeds close to that of
light) it will match the speed of some of the photons, causing them to disperse and resulting in
a disruption of the normal creation-to-annihilation cycle of the particle anti-particle pairs.
As such, some photons will be emitted from the vacuum as they are separated from their
mirror partner. However, it is extremely difficult to get an actual mirror to move at anything
close to the speed of light, so instead a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)
is oscillated at billions of times a second (gigahertz, GHz) with an electrical current in such a
way that it is able to mimic an electromagnetic mirror moving at close to the speed of light.
If all of the above empirical demonstrations were not enough to establish the importance of the
quantum vacuum beyond simply a virtual field of trivial consequence (and if you talk to some
skeptics, they arent), many physicists and researchers including the team at the Resonance
Project Foundation are already beginning to develop engines and energy generators based
on utilization and engineering of the quantum vacuum.
Although by conventional thinking such a propulsion device should be impossible, the fact that
it does appear to work is attributed to the polarizable structure of the vacuum the quantum
vacuum fluctuations. The same energetic oscillating bits utilized by Haramein to derive the
gravitational force at both the quantum and cosmological scales, as well to describe the
properties of the proton and the source of the nuclear binding force. In other words, such a
device would not work if space did not have the Planck-scale structure described in QGHM.
Note that the concept of the polarizable vacuum is nothing new (see previous publications), as
Haramein, Rauscher and others have been explaining and applying the concept of the
polarizable structure of the vacuum for many years to solve previously intractable problems in
physics as well as to expand our understanding of black holes, stellar dynamics, and quantum
processes with considerations of spacetime torque and Coriolis forces.
EmDrive NASA forum (for in depth discussion and analysis)
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com...Cannae Drive http://cannae.com/Theory of
electromagnetic reactionless drive Abraham-Minkowski controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abr...Propulsion Physics Research Group
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nas...Propulsion Research Ltd.
http://emdrive.com/principle.htm... of Microwave Propulsion for Spacecraft
http://www.newscientist.com/data... Polytechnical University report on microwave radiation

thruster http://www.emdrive.com/NWPU2010t...PublicationsSCALE UNIFICATION A

UNIVERSAL SCALING LAW FOR ORGANIZED MATTER:http://hiup.org/wp
-content/uploa...SPINORS, TWISTORS, QUATERNIONS, AND THE SPACETIME TORUS
TOPOLOGY:http://hiup.org/
wp-content/uploa...COLLECTIVE COHERENT OSCILLATION PLASMA MODES IN
SURROUNDING MEDIA OF BLACK HOLES AND VACUUM STRUCTURE QUANTUM
PROCESSES WITH CONSIDERATIONS OF SPACETIME TORQUE AND CORIOLIS
FORCES:http://hiup.org/wp.
Gravitational and inertial control devices such as Harameins magnetohydrodynamic plasma
resonator, Alcubierre warp-drives, and the like, you may be able to begin exploring other
nearby stellar systems, where countless unimaginable new worlds and discoveries await.

More to Explore
Full Interview: Roger Shawyer, Creator of EmDrive h
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...The EmDrive NASA forum (for in depth
discussion and analysis) http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com...Cannae Drive h
ttp://cannae.com/Theory of electromagnetic
reactionless drive Abraham-Minkowski controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abr...Advanced Propulsion Physics Research
Group http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nas...Satellite Propulsion Research Ltd. h
ttp://emdrive.com/principle.htmlTheory of
Microwave Propulsion for Spacecraft http://www.newscientist.com/data...Northwestern Polytechnical University report on
microwave radiation thruster http://www.emdrive.com/NWPU2010t...

Previous Publications
SCALE UNIFICATION A UNIVERSAL SCALING LAW FOR ORGANIZED MATTER:
http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploa...SPINORS, TWISTORS, QUATERNIONS, AND THE SPACETIME TORUS
TOPOLOGY:http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploa...COLLECTIVE COHERENT OSCILLATION PLASMA MODES IN SURROUNDING
MEDIA OF BLACK HOLES AND VACUUM STRUCTURE QUANTUM PROCESSES WITH CONSIDERATIONS OF
SPACETIME TORQUE AND CORIOLIS FORCES:http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploa...