FILEL IN DISCIPINARY DISTRICT IX WIGNOY-2 PH 3: 12) OF THE BOARD OF PRG Sis. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE burs. See” INRE: AMY P. WEIRICH BPR No. 14441, Respondent, ‘an Attomey Licensed to Practice Law in Tennessee (Shelby County) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ‘The Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment came on to be heard before the duly designated panel of District Committee members on October 31, 2016, and based on the panel's review of the pleadings, the stipulation entered into by the parties, the record as a whole, and in consideration of the statements of counsel at the hearing, the panel finds that, although no facts germane to the Motion are in dispute, no information was presented that the alleged ethical misconduct was considered and detetmined previously and, therefore, the Motion should be denied. IT 1S, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Go ° Zod, P, Cassidy, Jr.,(Panel Chair (lecsidas a eel Respondent be and is hereby denied. thomas