You are on page 1of 2

Geetanee Napal (2006) An assessment of the ethical dimensions of corruption , Electronic

Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies , Vol. 11, No. 1.


The paper gives an idea on the how ethical decisions are often ignored when it comes to utility
maximization. Corruption starts at a micro level that is, in business context. However, if no
control is exercised, it takes a national dimension and becomes a cause for major concern. The
author in this paper presented two scenario the first scenario talked about a wealthy businessmen
who is been accused of a crime bribes the judiciary to get fair trial. The second scenario had
a individual who bribes the local authorities to get a building permit. The first scenario depicts
a scene where the accuser encourages the decision maker to use his/her self-interest to acquire
happiness in form of security to him. While in the second scenario the notion of duty overlap
with self-interest. The evidence of the study shows that the bribery continues to characterize and
dominate the world of business , depending on who the culture accepts the practice of offering
and inviting bribes. And also if a control system is not there that it tends to encourages
corruption. The study shows that in many contexts, acts of corruption are accepted and justified
either on the basis of the gains they bring to the individual who offered the bribe or undertake to
seek the particular favor.

Reference : http://ejbo.jyu.fi/pdf/ejbo_vol11_no1_pages_5-9.pdf
***************************************************************************
Georgios I. Zekos, (2004) "Ethics versus corruption in globalization", Journal of Management
Development, Vol. 23 Iss: 7, pp.631 647
Moral conduct and valuemaximizing conduct clearly are not proportionate. People and
associations will deplete every accessible increase from exchange and the subsequent
designation of assets will be productive when portion will reflect precisely society's chances and
inclinations including inclinations identified with people's moral guidelines. Which practices
are moral and which are exploitative? Universal society because of globalization needs to create
and set up normal moral standards of conduct in social life considering religion and world human
progress. The fundamental estimations of people and life as creation must be indistinguishable
everywhere throughout the world, which implies that human conduct ought to be comparable
everywhere throughout the world. Along these lines, comparative activities ought to be moral or

deceptive correspondingly everywhere throughout the world and standards built up by various
types of social orders ought not adjust the premise of estimations of life and humankind. The
absolute opposite of morals versus debasement is evident keeping in mind morals can prompt
quality expansion over the long haul, defilement prompts esteem minimization over the long haul
paying little respect to shortterm esteem boost. Moral standards are changing and are impacted
by society, innovation and religion influencing in parallel the origination of the wrong doing of
debasement. There is not a standard level of morals in various parts of social life, yet the creator
considers that in any event the standard of morals of human life ought to be unchangeable.
Cloning ought not separate enormously morals in regards to the presence of human life and
change the substance of people's presence and part on earth. Shockingly, individuals can't
generally concede to what is moral and what is most certainly not. A significant number of the
exchange arrangements that most nations have received are dishonest. An organization has a
politicaleconomic personality relying upon a state for its lawful presence, thus a perfect
circumstance will be that the organization ought to consider the results of its activities for the
state and to act emphatically to safeguard political qualities improving business sector
framework skill and not to undermine true blue government establishments. Organizations ought
to have set up work force strategy and sets of accepted rules that reflect moral standards instead
of just guidelines, and which plan to instigate representatives to feel that they should "follow"
rather "comply" organization forced principles. Defilement in a little scale is evident that will
keep on surviving and consider that people won't get to be blessed messengers. The procedure of
globalization ought to prompt a harmonization of moral standards in business and in a superior
comprehension of good standards and qualities. Universal society because of globalization needs
to create and build up basic moral standards of conduct in social life considering religion and
world human progress. The presentation of sets of accepted rules enforceable globally and not
intentionally characterizing the key standards of business contacts will set up a fit perspective
with respect to debasement strategies and moral standards and forbidding the foundation of
defilement techniques and not sanctifying through water them as morally essential for business.

Reference : http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/02621710410546641

You might also like