Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Electrochemistry
1.1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2
An Empirical Approach to an Electrochemical Cell . . . . . . . . . . .
1.3
Units and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4
Half Cell Conventions - Standard States-and other items . . . . . . . .
1.5
Electrochemical Potential and the Gibbs Free Energy . . . . . . . . .
1.6
Temperature Dependence of E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.7
Concentration Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.7.1 Application to Active Transport of Na+ Through a Cell Membrane
1.8
Cautionary Note when Adding Half Reactions: . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.9
The Case of the Missing Cytochrome-b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.10
A Rechargeable Battery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.11
Potentiometric Titration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
. 1
. 1
. 3
. 4
. 5
. 6
. 6
. 7
. 9
. 10
. 12
. 12
Electrochemistry
James C. Baird
Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
10. April. 1996
Chapter 1
Electrochemistry
1.1
Introduction
1.2
Let us take an electrochemical cell composed of a zinc electrode and a copper electrode set
in a conductive solution containing zinc and copper ions, Fig. 1.1.
The electrodes are connected by means of a voltmeter. The voltmeter is noticed to read
1.10 volts when there are 1M concentrations of Zn and Cu ions with a temperature of 298K
and a pressure of 1 atm. We also notice that Cu plates out at the copper electrode and
that Zn dissolves from the zinc electrode. A number of questions come to mind. Can we
get useful work out of this? How much and how fast? We may do some experiments. At
constant T and varying the concentration ratio of [Zn++ ]/[Cu++ ] we measure the voltage
and find the following empirical curve, Fig. 1.2.
Now we keep the concentration constant, vary the temperature and measure the voltage
to find the following graph, Fig. 1.3.
An empirical curve that exhibits this behavior is:
E = V = a bT ln
[Zn++ ]
[Cu++ ]
where a and b are constants. We can derive this from thermodynamics and connect it to
the Gibbs free energy and to the equilibrium constant. In other words, electrochemistry is
1
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
a method for the evaluation of Gibbs free energies and equilibrium constants. We have this
picture: an electrochemical cell develops voltage by means of chemical reactions, current
flows and work may be done.
1.3
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
4. 360/96500 = 3.73 x 103 Faradays therefore 3.37 x 103 moles OH produced and
[OH ] = 3.73x103 /0.3 = 0.0124 or pH = 12.1
5. At the other electrode we have
2Cl Cl2 (g) + 2e
as the easy process, otherwise we just get the electrolysis of water. For the chlorine
electrolysis two Faradays are involved in the production of one mole of chlorine gas
and at 1 atm and 298K there are 0.46 mL of gas produced.
The maximum work we can get is determined by the potential difference and the amount
of charge passed. E depends on the specific chemical reaction, while Q depends on the
amount of chemicals. What determines the speed and hence the power available? The
relationship between E and current is complicated, depending on the physical details of the
electrodes. The emf of a cell will decrease as current is generated because the cell will not
be working reversibly and cannot do maximum work.
1.4
E = 1.103V
EH = 0
ECu
Cu (1M ) + 2e Cu(s)
++
+
H2 (g) + Cu (1M ) 2H (1M ) + Cu(s)
E = 0.337
where we measure E and since the convention sets EH = 0 we know the (Cu++ ,Cu) half
reaction potential ECu = 0.337. Now measuring the Zn, Cu potential we can determine
the Zn half reaction potential. In this manner a series of half reaction potentials can be
determined.
1.5
F dx
dE
dx
so the electrochemical work is
Z
Z
dE
dx = eE
Wel = e Edx = e
dx
F or n moles of electrons
Wel = nFE where F = 96, 486 Coulombs/mole
F = eE and E =
dG = dH SdT T dS
dG = V dP SdT nFdE
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
dG = nFdE
integrating
G = nFE
Refered to the standard state : Go = -nF Eo .
Recall that
G = Go + RT ln Q
where Q is the ratio of concentrations of products to reactants with the corresponding
stoichiometric coefficients. Therefore,
E = Eo
RT
ln Q.
nF
RT
ln K
nF
at equlibrium
In otherwords, a battery wears out at equilibrium, or a battery is a free energy meter. The
electrochemical potential may be used to determine the equilibrium constant.
1.6
Temperature Dependence of E
Since the electrochemical potential depends on the Gibbs Free energy, we can determine the
temperature dependence of E. Here we have assumed that H o is independent of temperature.
H o 1
1
Eo (T2 ) Eo (T1 )
T2
T1
nF
T2
T1
1.7
Concentration Cell
Suppose we have two solutions of copper ions each in contact with copper metal one at a
concentration of 0.01M and the other at 0.1M and separated by a gel so there will be no
mixing. The half reactions will be:
Cu(s) Cu++ (0.01M ) + 2e
Cu++ (0.1M ) + 2e Cu(s)
here n = 2; T = 298K, P = 1atm.
Cu++ (0.1M ) Cu++ (0.01M )
E =
so
RT [Cu++ (0.01M )]
ln
= 29.5mV.
nF
[Cu++ (0.1M )]
This is the same idea as a membrane potential where two concentrations are seperated
by a semipermeable membrane.
We may also generate a potential from a pressure difference.
H2 (10atm) 2H + + 2e
2H + + 2e H2 (2atm)
or
H2 (10atm) H2 (2atm) G = Go + RT ln
2
= nFE
10
1.7.1
It is known that in a living cell sodium is transported from inside to outside and potassium
from outside to inside. The concentration of sodium ions are higher outside and the concentration of potassium ions is higher inside the cell. We shall see that these facts mean
that the cell membrane must contain active ingredients for this to occur. Besides this
transport of ions through the cell membrane, there is also an observed potential across the
membrane of V = Voutside Vinside = 0.060 volts during this transport of ions.
Figure 1.4: Schematic Cell Showing Active Transport of Na+ and K+ Ions
First, consider the chemical forces just due to the concentrations of sodium and potassium ions on either side of the cell membrane. Going from inside to outside the cell the free
energies are:
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
0.14
= 3.10 kJ/mol
0.04
0.004
= 8.43 kJ/mol
K + (inside) K + (outside) Go = RT log
0.12
That is, the sodium chemical potential is negative from outside to inside and the potassium
chemical potential is negative from inside to outside just the reverse of the active transport. This means that the cell stuff is making up enough negative free energy to not only
drive the ion transport through the membrane but also to supply an additional 0.06 volts
(corresponding to ZFV = (1)(96.468)(0.060) = 5.79 kJ/mol). If we put these together we
get
[N a+ ]out
G(N a+ ) = RT ln
+ ZFV = 8.89 kJ/mol
[N a+ ]in
[K + ]in
+ ZFV = 2.64 kJ/mol
G(K + ) = RT ln +
[K ]out
G(total) = +11.53 kJ/mol
N a+ (inside) N a+ (outside)
Go = RT log
so there is some reaction supplying at least -11.53 kJ/mol of free energy to drive the transport. A convenient energetic reaction to supply this negative free energy is the reaction
converting the so called high energy phosphates,
NH 2
N
C
N
N
O
-O
P
O-
O
O
P
O-
O
O
P O
CH 2 O
OH
OH
OH
where the 0 means that pH = 7 rather than pH = 0 is used as the standard state. In
biochemical reactions pH = 7 is a more natural state than is [H+ ] = 1 M. This has an
important effect on the free energies. Let us take [H+ ] from 1 M to [H+ ] = 107 M.
H + (1M ) H + (107 M )
G = Go + RT log
107
= 0 39.94 kJ/mol
1
Go = +8.98 kJ/mol
Go = 30.96 kJ/mol
If the ATP reaction can be coupled to the active transport mechanism it can provide
enough negative free energy to drive the reaction.1
1.8
When we add half reactions we are adding Gibbs free energies and not electrochemical
potentials. We can see this most clearly if we consider the following reaction:
a)F e2+ + 2e F e(s)
b)F e3+ + e F e2+
or
c)F e3+ + 3e F e(s)
Eoa = 0.440V
Eob = 0.770V
Eoc = 0.036V
Eo = 0.49V
Eo = 1.33V
Eo = 1.82V
10
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
We must multiply the first equation by a factor of 3 to get the electrons to cancel when
we add the two half reactions. Thus n = 6 for this reaction and Eo = 1.82 V. In more
detail, Go1 = -6F (0.49) and Go2 = -6F(1.33) so:
Eo = 1.82V =
6F(0.49) 6F(1.33)
(6)(F)
.
Finally let us consider the calculation of the equilibrium constant for the dissociation of
water using electrochemical potentials. From tables of electrochemical potentials we have
the following half reactions:
a)O2 (g) + 2H2 O(l) + 4e 4OH Eo = 0.405V
b)O2 (g) + 4H + + 4e 2H2 O(l) Eo = 1.23V
To get KW we need H2 O H+ + OH so
Eo = 0.405V
1/4O2 (g) + 1/2H2 O(l) + e OH
(1/4O2 (g) + H + + e 1/2H2 O(l) Eo = 1.23V )
Eo = 0.82V
n=1
H2 O(l) H + + OH
therefore Go = -(1)(96486)(-0.825) = -R(298)ln [H + ][OH ]
or
KW = e(79613/8.3x298) = 1.0 x 1014
Instead of dividing the equations above by 4 we could have left them unchanged. We
would then have:
O2 (g) + 2H2 O(l) + 4e 4OH Eo = 0.405V
(O2 (g) + 4H + + 4e 2H2 O(l) Eo = 1.23V )
4H2 O(l) 4H + + 4OH Eo = 0.825V & n = 4
The electrochemical potential is the same, but the number of electrons is n = 4. Also
the number of moles of reactants and products is greater. We can calculate the equilibrium
constant for this reaction.
Go = (4)(96486)(0.825) = R(298)ln[H + ]4 [OH ]4
K = (KW )4 = e(479613/8.3298) = 1.214 1056 = (1.0 1014 )4
Note the role of n, the number of charges exchanged, and the difference between E and
Go .
1.9
A 17 year old female suffered from lactic acidosis and muscle weakness since she was 9
years old. The bioenergetic capacity of the resting muscle was found from 31 P nuclear
magnetic resonance assay of phosphocreatine2 to inorganic phosphate to be 15% of normal,
2
phosphocreatine takes part in the energy cycle in muscle in reactions of the type
11
and decreased with exercise. Cytochrome-c (c) level was normal, but cytochrome-b (b)
was missing. [Naturally, this means the cytochrome-c could not be reduced as a part of
bioenergetic activity.] Artificial Redox compounds were added in place of cytochrome-b to
reduce c directly. This treatment led to marked improvement in exercise capacity.3
This patient was missing cytochrome-b in muscle and therefore was without the oxidationreduction properties for the redox couple cyt-c, cyt-b. 4
A biolgical Redox compound, vitamin K2 , Fig. 1.6, which in its oxidized state we will
call dione (containing two C=O groups) and in its reduced form we will call diol (containing
two C-OH groups) was added replacing the missing reducing agent.
O
+ 2H
+ 2e O-H
O-H
Eo (volts)
Go (kJ/mol)
Keq
0.300
-28.94
1.2105
-46.69
1.5108
We can see from reaction b) that a negative free energy is developed using the K2
substitute with an equilibrium constant larger than 1000 times the normal reaction. The
3 Paraphrased from W. A. Cramer and D. B. Knaff, Energy Transduction in Biological
Membranes, Springer-Verlag 1990, page 330.
4 Cytochrome-c is an iron-heme protein with a molecular weight of about 12,000
grams/mol containing a porphyrin ring with its central nitrogens complexing an iron ion.
This iron ion undergoes an oxidation-reduction reaction, F e3+ + e F e2+ , that forms the
basic chemistry for the molecule.
12
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
simple application of electrochemistry and use of Gibbs free energy explains a practical
problem. The detailed chemistry of energy production is complex and it seems supprising
that this introduction of a substitute redox partner got to the site and intervened in the
chemistry. The fundamentals of the electrochemistry are correct.
1.10
A Rechargeable Battery
1
[H + ]4 [SO42 ]2
+ (1)(96, 468)(4)
(6.4
1012 )2
= 385.9 kJ/mol + 385.9 kJ/mol + 192.94 kJ/mol = 385.9 kJ/mol
1012 )4 (3.2
a positive free energy for the discharge reaction. Therefore the reaction will run in reverse
(a negative free energy) and we say that the battery is charging. That is, we are building up
1
the reactant concentrations and RT log [H + ]4 [SO
2 2 is becomming more negative as hydrogen
]
4
ion and sulfate build up. Fig. 1.7 illustrates the changing G as a function of [SO42 ] as
the reverse reaction (charging) proceeds.
1.11
Potentiometric Titration
13
[SO4--]
Figure 1.7: G Change during Recharging
follow the oxidation of Fe2+ by the addition of Ce4+ and make a quantitative determination
of ferrous iron in solution. The reactions are:
F e2+ F e3+ + e
Ce4+ + e Ce3+
Eo = 0.77V
Eo = 1.61V
Eo = 0.84V
From this electrochemical potential we calculate the equilibrium constant for this reaction
to be K = 1.7 x 1014 . Therefore, the addition of x amount of Ce4+ will essentially all react
with Fe2+ to form x amount of Fe3+ and x amount of Ce3+ .
We use a single cell with an electrode in contact with the reacting solution into which
cerium 4+ is being added and we connect a suitable voltmeter to a cell separated from
the reactant mixture by a salt bridge and containing ferrous, ferric, Ce4+ and Ce3+ ions.
This cell potential is an indicator of the extent of the reaction and is given by either of the
following equations:
RT [F e3+ ]
ln
EF e = EoF e
nF [F e2+ ]
RT [Ce3+ ]
ECe = EoCe
ln
nF [Ce4+ ]
Suppose the fraction of ferrous iron reacted is x then the amount of ferrous remaining will
be (1 - x)CF e where CF e is the total concentration of iron. The amount of Fe3+ formed will
be xCF e and the electrochemical potential will be given by
EF e = 0.77V
x
RT
ln
nF
1x
14
CHAPTER 1. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
x
has a sharp rise followed by a slowly changing slope followed again by a
This function ln 1x
sharp rise in the neighborhood of x = 1. When we have added an amount of Ce4+ necessary
to completely remove Fe2+ x = 1 and we have the end point. The rapid voltage rise in
the neighborhood of the endpoint allows us to accurately determine the endpoint.
1
RT
ln
nF y 1
This curve takes over where the first curve stopped.5 The total electrochemical potential
curve is shown in Fig. 1.8. The endpoint at x = 1 can be easily seen.
5
The first curve becomes infinite because we are doing an approximate calculation. We
have to avoid the infinity and stop the calculation with x close to 1, say 0.999, and then
begin the second potential calculation.