Always Challenge Jurisdiction | aFreeCountry.

com

1 of 5

http://afreecountry.com/?q=jurisdiction

6/24/2016 3:01 PM

Always Challenge Jurisdiction | aFreeCountry.com

2 of 5

Freedom Guidance
Never Use the Word "Yes"
in Court
Conspiracy Theorists and
Crazy People
Leaders Among Us
Why People Should Never
Hire Attorneys
KC Massey versus the
United States, Inc.
Don't Lose Your House to
Foreclosure
The Wrong Way to Assert
Your Rights
Liberalism is a Feminine
Trait
Liberalism and Freedom
Cannot Coexist
Obama Tried and
Sentenced to be Hanged
for Treason
More

http://afreecountry.com/?q=jurisdiction

court that Judge Dawson was presiding over that day was an equity court, not a

Recent
comments
New Topics
common law court. In a common law court, Judge Dawson would have been

required to allow the defense to present case law and United States code that the
courtFile
did not
allow during for
this latest trial. It should
be noted that, according
counterclaim
Courtalso
De-Jure
to theanything
transcript,2Schiff
was 6
notdays
sworn in before
his testimony.
Since, signing a
months
What
is a manifest
Formago
1040 is testimony that the signer is a federal
officer, if Schiff had been
injustice...
sworn
in, he would have
brought
charges sinceLesson
his signing the
Counter-claim
2 been
months
1 up on perjury
FreedomSkewl
formweek
would ago
have contradicted his testimony inPlans
the court that he is not a federal
officer.
The perjury
trial would
little
fact thus bringing
fact
Texas
Commission
on have exposed this
BAR
ASSOCIATION
is the
being
into the
light ofConduct
day for all to observe.
Judicial
SUED
22022016 4 months 2 days
28 U.S. Code 453 - Oaths
Schiff's
jurisdictionand
overJudges
him, a people.
of Justices
agomistake was in not challenging the courts
People
are not
subject
to statutes in a republic, because a republican form of
Please
start
a new
people2from
having their
rights taken by popular vote.
government
thread.protects
4 months
days
More
ago
If Schiff
had challenged
....also
4 monthsjurisdiction,
3 days the court would not have been able to prove
it, because
ago there is already case law that upholds the fact that the court cannot
haveNot
jurisdiction
a people,
giving over
consent
4 since "we the people" are sovereign having the
samemonths
authority 3asdays
kings.ago
2160115 Kassidy's letter to
The Clerk
reason to
forfile
thislegal
challenge is people are human beings and human beings
having
natural rights,
not to be 1confused
documents
5 months
day with civil rights, are not subject to any
equity
court jurisdiction. The prosecutor would have had to have a people who
ago
was wronged
by theof
so Refusal
called defendant.
A crime is only committed when one of
Clerk Letter
to
the people
"commits"
a crime 5against another one of the people. A crime is not
file dated
20160121
committed
when
statute
months
1 aday
agohas been "violated" by a people, because statutes do not
applyDistrict
to people,
they only
apply to "citizens" and other fictitious entities , such as
Clerk
did it
licensed
companies. Of course,
again...21012016
5 people, being sovereigns, have the right to subject
themselves
to anyone
any thing they so desire.
months
5 daysorago
I talked with Kassidy
Another
reason that
"government"
does not have jurisdiction over people is
yesterday
5 the
months
6
just about
days every
ago government entity in the united states of America incorporated.
According to Bank of United States v. Planters' Bank of Georgia, 22 U.S. 9
Wheat. 904 904 (1824) government corporations do not have any more authority
granted them in their originating charter. As a corporation, they waive whatever
sovereignty they had prior to their incorporation.
The following are just a small sample of the many cases that uphold the
requirement that anytime jurisdiction is challenged it must be proven.
The law provides that once State and Federal
Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.
Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980)
Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time and once challenged,

6/24/2016 3:01 PM

Always Challenge Jurisdiction | aFreeCountry.com

3 of 5

http://afreecountry.com/?q=jurisdiction

cannot be assumed and must be decided. Basso v. Utah Power &

Light Co., 495 F 2d 906, 910.
"...there is, as well, no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction."
Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215
A court lacking jurisdiction cannot render judgment but must
dismiss the cause at any stage of the proceedings in which it
becomes apparent that jurisdiction is lacking. Bradbury v.
Dennis, 310 F.2d 73 (10th Cir. 1962)
The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction. Rosemond v.
Lambert, 469 F2d 416
...if the issue is presented in any way the burden of proving
jurisdiction rests upon him who invokes it. Latana v. Hopper, 102
F. 2d 188
When it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court
has no authority to reach the merits. In such a situation the action
should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Melo v. United
States, 505 F. 2d 1026
Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the
jurisdiction asserted. Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v.
New York, 37 F Supp. 150
No officer can acquire jurisdiction by deciding he has it. The
officer, whether judicial or ministerial, decides at his own peril."
Middleton v. Low (1866), 30 C. 596, citing Prosser v. Secor
(1849), 5 Barb.(N.Y) 607, 608
Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide any question
which occurs in the cause, and whether its decision be correct or
otherwise, its judgments, until reversed, are regarded as binding in
every other court. But if it acts without authority, its judgments and
orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply
void, and form no bar to a remedy sought in opposition to them,
even prior to a reversal. They constitute no justification, and all
persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences are
considered in law as trespassers. Elliott v Peirsol, 1 Pet. 328, 340,
26 U.S. 328, 340, 7L.Ed. 164 (1828)
Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject
matter on which it assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely

6/24/2016 3:01 PM

Always Challenge Jurisdiction | aFreeCountry.com

4 of 5

http://afreecountry.com/?q=jurisdiction

void in the fullest sense of the term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27

A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a
basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its power to act, and a
court must have the authority to decide that question in the first
instance." Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 171
P2d 8; 331 US 549, 91 L. ed. 1666, 67 S.Ct. 1409
Defend Freedom

Tags:
jurisdiction
challenge jurisdiction
court of record
inferior court
Like

53

Log in or register to post comments

Recent content
Kassidy Townsend vs. State of Texas
Kassidy T
Court De-Jure
squireknight1
No 2nd Amendment for US Citizens
M. R. Hamilton
How Private Business Makes Money from Owning Prisons
M. R. Hamilton
[Member Announcment] Update to Terms of Service
M. R. Hamilton
Terms of Use
M. R. Hamilton
How The IRS Wins in Tax Court and How to Beat It
M. R. Hamilton
What is a manifest injustice...
aerin-james
FreedomSkewl Lesson Plans
B.W. Cornwell

6/24/2016 3:01 PM

Always Challenge Jurisdiction | aFreeCountry.com

5 of 5

http://afreecountry.com/?q=jurisdiction

6/24/2016 3:01 PM