Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-Ci-13373 Exhibit Re Current State of Affairs and Motion For Summary Judgment November 17, 2016

Gmail - Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59847465 Transaction Receipt
1 of 1
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59847465 Transaction Receipt

2 messages
FileAndServeXpress <TransactionReceipt@secure-mail.fileandservexpress.com>
To: "stancaterbone@gmail.com" <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:27 AM
To: Stan J Caterbone

Subject: Transaction Receipt
This email is to confirm receipt of your documents. The transaction option you selected was "File Only". The details for this transaction are listed
below.
Court:
PA Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Case Name:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS DUKE ST BUSINESS CENTER
Case Number:
CI-08-13373
Transaction ID:
59847465
Document Title(s):
Cover - Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 EXHIBIT re CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT November 17, 2016 (15 pages)
Authorized Date/Time:
Nov 17 2016 6:26AM EST
Authorizer:
Pro Se
Authorizer's Organization:
Pro Se
Sending Parties:
Caterbone, Stanley J
Thank you for using File & ServeXpress.
Questions? For prompt, courteous assistance please contact File & ServeXpress Client Support by phone at 1-888-529-7587 (24/7).
Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:58 AM
To: stedmanc@co.lancaster.pa.us, sector5@lancasterpolice.com, Officer Binderup <binderuc@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>, Richard Cosmore
<cosmorer@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>, Peter Anders <peter.anders@millersville.edu>, Jim Doran <James_Doran@msn.com>, "E: Philep Wenger"
<pwenger@fultonbank.com>, barry@barrygoldmanlaw.com, Barbara Hough Roda <broda@lnpnews.com>, Phil Caterbone
<philip.caterbone@gmail.com>
[Quoted text hidden]
11/17/2016 10:56 AM
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-598-2200
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION LAW
___________________________________________________________
STAN J. CATERBONE
:
:
V.
DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, et. al.,
Case No. CI-08-13373
EXHIBIT re CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW, on this 17th day of November, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro se, do
hereby file this EXHIBIT re CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS.
THE APPEALLANT REQUESTS THE
COURT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING AND IT'S OATH OF OFFICE AND THE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULES:
1. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION - Monday

November 14, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-JCaterbone-and-Conflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
2. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies
November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/FalseImprisonments-and-Illegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November12-2016
3. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of
November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-JCaterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-Docket-Sheets-asof-November-12-2016
Page
Page11of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
4. FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON FINANCIAL
with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control Research of Monday
November 7, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-ProbeFulton-Bank-and-3-Other-Subsidiary-Banks-of-Fulton-Financial-With-Stan-JCaterbone-Civil-Actions-and-Mind-Control-Research-of-Monday-Novem
5. U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter REQUEST
FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to President Obama,
November 15, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/SupremeCourt-of-the-United-States-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-toOBAMA-Re-CATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove
Page
Page22of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
I cite the following federal stature regarding the DEFENDANTS ACTIONS toward me and the
efforts to thwart, interfere, interrupt, and deter this case toward a successful conclusion, and this courts
and the local law enforcement collusion in participating in OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE:
18 USC 1512 - TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(a) (1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to
(A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) prevent the production of a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(C) prevent the communication by any person to a law enforcement officer or judge of
the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a
Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, parole, or release pending judicial
proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person, or attempts
to do so, with intent to
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or
availability of the object for use in an official proceeding;
(iii) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a
record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(iv) be absent from an official proceeding to which that person has been summoned by
legal process; or
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the
United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending
judicial proceedings;
(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and 1112;
(B) in the case of
(i) an attempt to murder; or
(ii) the use or attempted use of physical force against any person;
imprisonment for not more than 30 years; and
(C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force against any person, imprisonment for
not more than 20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or
attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the objects integrity
or availability for use in an official proceeding;
18 USC 1512
NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscprint.html).
-2(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record,
Page
Page33of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or

(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal
process; or
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United
States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or
a violation of conditions of probation 1 supervised release,,1 parole, or release pending judicial
proceedings;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(c) Whoever corruptly
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do
so, with the intent to impair the objects integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades
any person from
(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;
(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation 1 supervised release,,1
parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
(3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or
(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation proceeding, to be sought
or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
(e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an affirmative defense, as to which the
defendant has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct consisted
solely
of lawful conduct and that the defendants sole intention was to encourage, induce, or cause the other
person to testify truthfully.
(f) For the purposes of this section
(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense;
and
(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or
free of a claim of privilege.
(g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind need be proved with respect
to the circumstance
(1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court, magistrate judge, grand jury, or government
agency is before a judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate judge, a
bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury, or a Federal Government agency; or
(2) that the judge is a judge of the United States or that the law enforcement officer is an officer or
employee of the Federal Government or a person authorized to act for or on behalf of the Federal
Government or serving the Federal Government as an adviser or consultant.
(h) There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section.
(i) A prosecution under this section or section 1503 may be brought in the district in which the official
proceeding (whether or not pending or about to be instituted) was intended to be affected or in the
district in which the conduct constituting the alleged offense occurred.
(j) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, the maximum
term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise
18 USC 1512
NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscprint.html).
-3provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such
case.
(k) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties
as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.
Footnotes
Page
Page44of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
1 So in original.
(Added Pub. L. 97291, 4(a), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1249; amended Pub. L. 99646, 61, Nov. 10,
1986, 100 Stat. 3614; Pub. L. 100690, title VII, 7029(a), (c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4397, 4398; Pub.
L. 101650, title III, 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117; Pub. L. 103322, title VI, 60018, title XXXIII,
330016(1)(O), (U), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1975, 2148; Pub. L. 104214, 1(2), Oct. 1, 1996, 110
Stat. 3017; Pub. L. 104294, title VI, 604(b)(31), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 107204, title
XI, 1102, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 107273, div. B, title III, 3001(a), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002,
116 Stat. 1803, 1804; Pub. L. 110177, title II, 205, Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2537.)
Dated November 17, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-598-2200
ACTIVE COURT CASES
1. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
2. U.S. SUPREME COURT, Case No. 16-8822 LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT HABEUS CORPUS APPEAL of U.S. Third
Circuit 16-1149
3. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT
for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
4. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
5. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Page
Page55of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED IN MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

1. Judicial Misconduct
2. Selective and Retaliatory Discrimination under the 1990 Disabilities Act
3. Using the Courts for Political Vendettas
4. Attempted Extortion of Real Monies
5. Libel and Slander
6. Collusion of COINTELPRO-LIKE Tactics with Law Enforcement
The Court MUST consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the APPELLANT as it relates to the past 28 years and the myriad of
violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The APPELLANT will argue that it is wholly unfair
and unconstitutional not to grant the APPELLANT In Forma Pauperis Status. The APPELLANT has filed
ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating capital and assets, as well
building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have it all extorted through an
elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad. Therefore any attempt to subject the APPELLANT
to more court related fees is only a continuation of that same said fraud.
Consideration MUST be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, where the
courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due process
means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d. 644) have
concluded the following:
Even the probability of unfairness can result in a defendant being deprived
of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In addition the Petioner is the MOVANT
in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which
was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The preceding cases have been preserved
by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in case no. 07-4474, see attached.
The prosecutorial misconduct the the APPELLANT has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the APPELLANT from
completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A.
Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are
to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of
serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring
violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242;
U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed.
Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Page
Page66of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F.
Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:
Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment and its
proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at
different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall
plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up my International Signal &
Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
The APPEALLANT HAS 29 False Arrests in the County of Lancaster dating back to 1987, which
under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is
by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an inference that the unlawful combination has been in
front of facts formed for the purpose charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219.
In the same case the following was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga)
and its police officers were acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees
constitutional rights by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution
and the two (2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and
August 4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody.
The
preceding pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.

11. In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law, a
plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to do an
unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice with intent
to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the
following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to
permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of
serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of
deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state
infringement and protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18
U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A.
1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and 8
state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case, has
Page
Page77of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found
guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition,
the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of
"racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that allows plaintiffs to sue for triple
damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking
a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as
well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision is intended to force a
defendant to plead guilty before indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A
"person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an
"enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the
enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the
defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either
Federal or State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1
Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for their
behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or retribution for
cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies.
The RICO laws can be alleged in cases
where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or corporations in retaliation for
said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or against individuals or corporations
who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt to
curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as a
weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could be
alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct
fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before
the courts. These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of limitations has run out.
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December 2004).

Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya Andersen's
claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregon-riaa-victim-fightsback- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
Page
Page88of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
Date: November 17, 2016

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Page
Page99of
of15
9
Thursday
Thursday,November
November17,
17,2016
2016
18 USC 1512
NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscprint.html).
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(a) (1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to
(A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) prevent the production of a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(C) prevent the communication by any person to a law enforcement officer or judge of
the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a
Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, parole, or release pending judicial
proceedings;
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person, or attempts
to do so, with intent to
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or
availability of the object for use in an official proceeding;
(iii) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a
record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(iv) be absent from an official proceeding to which that person has been summoned by
legal process; or
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the
United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending
judicial proceedings;
(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and 1112;
(B) in the case of
(i) an attempt to murder; or
(ii) the use or attempted use of physical force against any person;
imprisonment for not more than 30 years; and
(C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force against any person, imprisonment for
not more than 20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or
attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the objects integrity
or availability for use in an official proceeding;
Page 10 of 15
-1-
Thursday November 17, 2016
18 USC 1512
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record,
document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal
process; or
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United
States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or
a violation of conditions of probation 1 supervised release,,1 parole, or release pending judicial
proceedings;
(c) Whoever corruptly
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do
so, with the intent to impair the objects integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades
any person from
(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;
(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation 1 supervised release,,1
parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
(3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or
(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation proceeding, to be sought
or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
(e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an affirmative defense, as to which the
defendant has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct consisted solely
of lawful conduct and that the defendants sole intention was to encourage, induce, or cause the other
person to testify truthfully.
(f) For the purposes of this section
(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense;
and
(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or
free of a claim of privilege.
(g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind need be proved with respect
to the circumstance
(1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court, magistrate judge, grand jury, or government
agency is before a judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate judge, a
bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury, or a Federal Government agency; or
(2) that the judge is a judge of the United States or that the law enforcement officer is an officer or
employee of the Federal Government or a person authorized to act for or on behalf of the Federal
Government or serving the Federal Government as an adviser or consultant.
(h) There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section.
(i) A prosecution under this section or section 1503 may be brought in the district in which the official
proceeding (whether or not pending or about to be instituted) was intended to be affected or in the
district in which the conduct constituting the alleged offense occurred.
(j) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, the maximum
term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise
Page 11 of 15
-2-
18 USC 1512
provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such
case.
(k) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties
as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.
Footnotes
1 So in original.
(Added Pub. L. 97291, 4(a), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1249; amended Pub. L. 99646, 61, Nov. 10,
1986, 100 Stat. 3614; Pub. L. 100690, title VII, 7029(a), (c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4397, 4398; Pub.
L. 101650, title III, 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117; Pub. L. 103322, title VI, 60018, title XXXIII,
330016(1)(O), (U), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1975, 2148; Pub. L. 104214, 1(2), Oct. 1, 1996, 110
Stat. 3017; Pub. L. 104294, title VI, 604(b)(31), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 107204, title
XI, 1102, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 107273, div. B, title III, 3001(a), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002,
116 Stat. 1803, 1804; Pub. L. 110177, title II, 205, Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2537.)
Amendments
2008Subsec. (a)(3)(A). Pub. L. 110177, 205(1)(A), amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar.
(A) read as follows: in the case of murder (as defined in section 1111), the death penalty or imprisonment for life,
and in the case of any other killing, the punishment provided in section 1112;.
Subsec. (a)(3)(B). Pub. L. 110177, 205(1)(B), substituted 30 years for 20 years in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (a)(3)(C). Pub. L. 110177, 205(1)(C), substituted 20 years for 10 years.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110177, 205(2), substituted 20 years for ten years in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 110177, 205(3), substituted 3 years for one year in concluding provisions.
2002Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(a)(1)(A), substituted as provided in paragraph (3) for as provided
in paragraph (2) in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(a)(1)(C), added par. (2). Former par. (2) redesignated (3).
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(a)(1)(B), (D), redesignated par. (2) as (3), added subpars. (B) and (C), and
struck out former subpar. (B) which read as follows: (B) in the case of an attempt, imprisonment for not more than
twenty years.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(a)(2), struck out or physical force after intimidation in introductory
provisions.
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(c)(1), inserted supervised release, after probation.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107204 added subsec. (c). Former subsec. (c) redesignated (d).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107204 redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d). Former subsec. (d) redesignated (e).
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(c)(1), inserted supervised release, after probation.
Subsecs. (e) to (j). Pub. L. 107204 redesignated former subsecs. (d) to (i) as (e) to (j), respectively.
Subsec. (k). Pub. L. 107273, 3001(a)(3), added subsec. (k).
1996Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 104294 inserted and after semicolon at end.
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 104214 added subsec. (i).
1994Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 103322, 60018, amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A)
read as follows: (A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and 1112 of this title; and.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103322, 330016(1)(U), substituted fined under this title for fined not more than $250,000
in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103322, 330016(1)(O), substituted fined under this title for fined not more than $25,000
in concluding provisions.
1988Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100690, 7029(c), substituted threatens, or corruptly persuades for or threatens.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 100690, 7029(a), added subsec. (h).
Page 12 of 15
-3-
18 USC 1512
1986Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99646, 61(2), (3), added subsec. (a) and redesignated former subsec. (a) as (b).
Subsecs. (b) to (g). Pub. L. 99646, 61(1), (3), redesignated former subsec. (a) as (b), inserted , delay, or prevent,
and redesignated former subsecs. (b) to (f) as (c) to (g), respectively.
Change of Name
Words magistrate judge and United States magistrate judge substituted for magistrate and United States
magistrate, respectively, in subsec. (f)(1) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101650, set out as a note under section
631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104294 effective Sept. 13, 1994, see section 604(d) of Pub. L. 104294, set out as a note
under section 13 of this title.
Effective Date
Section 9 of Pub. L. 97291 provided that:
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act and the amendments made by this Act [enacting this section and
sections 1513 to 1515, 3579, and 3580 of this title, amending sections 1503, 1505, 1510, and 3146 of this title and
Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and
sections 1501 and 3579 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 12, 1982].
(b)(1) The amendment made by section 2 of this Act [enacting provisions set out as a note under this section] shall
apply to presentence reports ordered to be made on or after March 1, 1983.
(2) The amendments made by section 5 of this Act [enacting sections 3579 and 3580 of this title] shall apply with
respect to offenses occurring on or after January 1, 1983.
Congressional Findings and Declaration of Purposes

Section 2 of Pub. L. 97291 provided that:
(a) The Congress finds and declares that:
(1) Without the cooperation of victims and witnesses, the criminal justice system would cease to function; yet with
few exceptions these individuals are either ignored by the criminal justice system or simply used as tools to identify
and punish offenders.
(2) All too often the victim of a serious crime is forced to suffer physical, psychological, or financial hardship first
as a result of the criminal act and then as a result of contact with a criminal justice system unresponsive to the real
needs of such victim.
(3) Although the majority of serious crimes falls under the jurisdiction of State and local law enforcement agencies,
the Federal Government, and in particular the Attorney General, has an important leadership role to assume in ensuring
that victims of crime, whether at the Federal, State, or local level, are given proper treatment by agencies administering
the criminal justice system.
(4) Under current law, law enforcement agencies must have cooperation from a victim of crime and yet neither
the agencies nor the legal system can offer adequate protection or assistance when the victim, as a result of such
cooperation, is threatened or intimidated.
(5) While the defendant is provided with counsel who can explain both the criminal justice process and the rights of
the defendant, the victim or witness has no counterpart and is usually not even notified when the defendant is released
on bail, the case is dismissed, a plea to a lesser charge is accepted, or a court date is changed.
(6) The victim and witness who cooperate with the prosecutor often find that the transportation, parking facilities,
and child care services at the court are unsatisfactory and they must often share the pretrial waiting room with the
defendant or his family and friends.
(7) The victim may lose valuable property to a criminal only to lose it again for long periods of time to Federal law
enforcement officials, until the trial and sometimes and [sic] appeals are over; many times that property is damaged
or lost, which is particularly stressful for the elderly or poor.
(b) The Congress declares that the purposes of this Act [see Short Title of 1982 Amendment note set out under section
1501 of this title] are
(1) to enhance and protect the necessary role of crime victims and witnesses in the criminal justice process;
Page 13 of 15
-4-
18 USC 1512
(2) to ensure that the Federal Government does all that is possible within limits of available resources to assist victims
and witnesses of crime without infringing on the constitutional rights of the defendant; and
(3) to provide a model for legislation for State and local governments.
Federal Guidelines for Treatment of Crime Victims and Witnesses in the

Criminal Justice System
Section 6 of Pub. L. 97291, as amended by Pub. L. 98473, title II, 1408(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2177, provided
that:
(a) Within two hundred and seventy days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 12, 1982], the Attorney General
shall develop and implement guidelines for the Department of Justice consistent with the purposes of this Act [see
Short Title of 1982 Amendment note set out under section 1501 of this title]. In preparing the guidelines the Attorney
General shall consider the following objectives:
(1) Services to victims of crime.Law enforcement personnel should ensure that victims routinely receive emergency
social and medical services as soon as possible and are given information on the following
(A) availability of crime victim compensation (where applicable);
(B) community-based victim treatment programs;
(C) the role of the victim in the criminal justice process, including what they can expect from the system as well as
what the system expects from them; and
(D) stages in the criminal justice process of significance to a crime victim, and the manner in which information
about such stages can be obtained.
(2) Notification of availability of protection.A victim or witness should routinely receive information on steps that
law enforcement officers and attorneys for the Government can take to protect victims and witnesses from intimidation.
(3) Scheduling changes.All victims and witnesses who have been scheduled to attend criminal justice proceedings
should either be notified as soon as possible of any scheduling changes which will affect their appearances or have
available a system for alerting witnesses promptly by telephone or otherwise.
(4) Prompt notification to victims of serious crimes.Victims, witnesses, relatives of those victims and witnesses
who are minors, and relatives of homicide victims should, if such persons provide the appropriate official with a current
address and telephone number, receive prompt advance notification, if possible, of
(A) the arrest of an accused;
(B) the initial appearance of an accused before a judicial officer;
(C) the release of the accused pending judicial proceedings; and
(D) proceedings in the prosecution and punishment of the accused (including entry of a plea of guilty, trial, sentencing,
and, where a term of imprisonment is imposed, a hearing to determine a parole release date and the release of the
accused from such imprisonment).
(5) Consultation with victim.The victim of a serious crime, or in the case of a minor child or a homicide, the family
of the victim, should be consulted by the attorney for the Government in order to obtain the views of the victim or
family about the disposition of any Federal criminal case brought as a result of such crime, including the views of
the victim or family about
(A) dismissal;
(B) release of the accused pending judicial proceedings;
(C) plea negotiations; and
(D) pretrial diversion program.
(6) Separate waiting area.Victims and other prosecution witnesses should be provided prior to court appearance a
waiting area that is separate from all other witnesses.
(7) Property return.Law enforcement agencies and prosecutor should promptly return victims property held for
evidentiary purposes unless there is a compelling law enforcement reason for retaining it.
(8) Notification to employer.A victim or witness who so requests should be assisted by law enforcement agencies
and attorneys for the Government in informing employers that the need for victim and witness cooperation in the
prosecution of the case may necessitate absence of that victim or witness from work. A victim or witness who, as a
direct result of a crime or of cooperation with law enforcement agencies or attorneys for the Government, is subjected
Page 14 of 15
-5-
18 USC 1512
to serious financial strain, should be assisted by such agencies and attorneys in explaining to creditors the reason for
such serious financial strain.
(9) Training by federal law enforcement training facilities.Victim assistance education and training should be
offered to persons taking courses at Federal law enforcement training facilities and attorneys for the Government so
that victims may be promptly, properly, and completely assisted.
(10) General victim assistance.The guidelines should also ensure that any other important assistance to victims and
witnesses, such as the adoption of transportation, parking, and translator services for victims in court be provided.
(b) Nothing in this title shall be construed as creating a cause of action against the United States.
(c) The Attorney General shall assure that all Federal law enforcement agencies outside of the Department of Justice
adopt guidelines consistent with subsection (a) of this section.
[Amendment of section 6 of Pub. L. 97291 by Pub. L. 98473, set out above, effective 30 days after Oct. 12, 1984,
see section 1409(a) of Pub. L. 98473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10601 of Title 42, The Public
Health and Welfare.]
Page 15 of 15
-6-
Gmail - Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59840565 Accepted w/Edits
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59840565 Accepted w/Edits

1 message
FileAndServeXpress <ClerkReviewNotification@secure-mail.fileandservexpress.com>
To: "stancaterbone@gmail.com" <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM
To: Stan Caterbone

Subject: Notice of Accepted and Edited Transaction
PA Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas has accepted a transaction in CI-08-13373 with edits.
The details for this transaction are listed below.
Court:
PA Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Case Name:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS DUKE ST BUSINESS CENTER
Case Number:
CI-08-13373
Transaction ID:
59840565
Authorized Date/Time:
Nov 16 2016 2:51AM EST
Authorizer:
Pro Se
Authorizer's Organization:
Pro Se
Sending Parties:
Caterbone, Stanley J
If you are a subscriber, you can view the changes the clerk has elected to make to the documents filed in this case online at https://secure.
fileandservexpress.com/Login/Login.aspx . You may see the details regarding the review status by clicking the 'Search' tab to the right of the screen
and searching for Transaction ID 59840565. The clerk's comments are listed below.
The filing fees were increased by $0.00.
Document Title(s):
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE AND TO ADD DEFENDANTS.
Status:
Accepted
Comment:
You will be billed for filing fee of $8.75.
Thank you for using File & ServeXpress.

Questions? For prompt, courteous assistance please contact File & ServeXpress Client Support by phone at 1-888-529-7587 (24/7).
1 of 1
11/17/2016 10:42 AM
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION LAW
___________________________________________________________
STAN J. CATERBONE
:
:
V.
DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, et. al.,
PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS
___________________________________________________________
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly reinstate the Complaint originally filed on December 3, 2008 in the above captioned
action.
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 401(b)(2) Time For Service, Reissuance, Reinstatement and Substitution of
Original Process, Copies for Service,
which states "A writ may be reisued or a complaint reinstated at
any time and any number of times. A new party defendant may be named in a reinstated writ or a
reinstated complaint".
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 126 Liberal Construction and Application of Rules, which states "the rules
shall be liberally construed to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action or
proceeding to which they are applicable. The court at every stage of any such action or proceeding
may disregard any error or defect of procedure which does not affect the substantial rights of the
parties.
Case No. CI-08-13373 PRAECIPE
Page 1 of 32
Wednesday November 16, 2016
THE APPEALLANT REQUESTS THE COURT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING AND IT'S
OATH OF OFFICE:
1. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION - Monday

November 14, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-JCaterbone-and-Conflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
2. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies
November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/FalseImprisonments-and-Illegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November12-2016
3. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of

November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-JCaterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-Docket-Sheets-asof-November-12-2016
4. Letter REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to

President Obama, November 15, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331229947/Letter-REQUEST-for-COMMUTATIONof-the-Sentence-of-Lisa-Michell-Lambert-to-President-Obama-November-15-2016
Kindly add the following named parties to the above captioned complaint:
Robert S. Walker, Adviser to the Trump Administration, Robert Walker did write in an
OPED article on October 24, 2016 the following, thus admitting to being somewhat
responsible for the advancement of CONTINUATION pain and suffering for Stan J.
Caterbone from ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS, . . . Americas space program is suffering
from significant under-investment both the weak Obama-Clinton economy and a lack of
strategic vision are major causes. Meanwhile, China and Russia continue to move briskly forward
with military-focused space initiatives.
Indeed, each continues to develop weapons explicitly
designed, as the Pentagon has noted, to deny, degrade, deceive, disrupt, or destroy Americas
eyes and ears in space. ...A Trump administration will also lead the way on emerging
technologies that have the potential to revolutionize warfare. For example, both China and
Russia are aggressively moving forward with a range of hypersonic weapons that are very
difficult to defend against with traditional air-defense interceptors. Trump administration will
Page 2 of 32
increase the coordination between DARPA, NASA, and the private sector to ensure the U.S.
remains well ahead of the technology curve. ..
He further described the campaigns space framework by listing nine key aspects of its proposed
implementation:
1. A commitment to global space leadership that Walker said would produce the
technology, security and jobs needed for the United States in the 21st century.
2. A reinstitution of the National Space Council, headed by the vice president, to oversee
all government space efforts to seek efficiencies and eliminate redundancies. The council
was last in operation during the presidency of George H.W. Bush.
3. A goal of human exploration of the solar system by the end of the century, which
Walker said would serve as a stretch goal to drive technology developments to a
stronger degree than simply a goal of humans to Mars.
4. Shifting NASA budgets to deep space achievements rather than Earth science and
climate research. Walker said that some, unspecified NASA Earth science missions might
be better handled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, but there
would have to be some budget adjustments to transfer those missions from NASA to
NOAA.
5. Development of small satellite technologies that in particular can provide resiliency for
the military, and also develop satellite servicing technologies.
6. Seek world leadership in hypersonics technology, including for military applications.
7. Hand over access to and operations in low Earth orbit to the commercial sector.
8. Start discussions about including more private and public partners in operations and
financing of the International Space Station, including extending the stations lifetime.
Walker also left open the possibility of including China as one of those new partners.
9. Require that all federal agencies develop plans for how they would use space assets
and space developments to carry out their missions.
One issue that Walker did not directly raise in his outline of a Trump administration space policy
was funding for NASA. We are not likely to get huge new numbers for the space program in the
future, even if we get the budget settled, he said later in the COMSTAC discussion. He called for
marshaling the resources of the entire space community to carry out those policies, but didnt
go into details about how that would be done.
- See more at: http://spacenews.com/what-a-trump-administration-means-forspace/#sthash.vUj0B74V.dpuf
This Space Initiative is directly connected to the following INITIATIVE pursued by
Lancaster County Congressman Joe Pitts, which states the following involving
ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS Securing EW's Future, Create Single Leader To Direct Planning, Training, By REP. JOE PITTS,
Published: 7 July 2008, As a veteran of the U.S. Air Force who served three tours of duty in
Vietnam, as a navigator and electronic warfare (EW) officer on board B-52s, I learned the
absolute necessity of brandishing a dominant EW capability. However, I continue to watch as EW
faces neglect in the doctrine, investment and leadership of our armed forces. We cannot afford
to wait until the fighting starts to think about EW. By consolidating leadership within the Office of
the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and the services, creating more effective investment strategies
and better training our troops to utilize EW, I believe the future of EW will be strengthened to the
benefit of our armed forces. In response to glaring shortfalls in EW realized during Operation
Page 3 of 32
Allied Force over Kosovo in 1999, I founded the congressional EW Working Group (EWWG),
intended to be a resource to Congress, the Department of Defense and the defense community
at large about the need to invest in EW technology and capabilities. The current operations
in Iraq and Afghanistan again have highlighted the need to strengthen U.S.
superiority in the electromagnetic spectrum. EW continues to save hundreds of lives by
defeating improvised explosive devices that use electronic triggering devices, such as cell
phones and car key fobs. But our adversaries are becoming more adept at operating in the
spectrum by identifying where we are vulnerable, and we must continually learn to counter
rapidly advancing technology.
The
entire
article
can
be
viewed
at
the
following
link
https://www.scribd.com/document/313421519/Recorded-DefenseNews-Story-byJoe-Pitts-ELECTROMAGNETIC-Weapons-and-Founder-of-the-Electronic-WarfareWorking-Group-for-Securing-Weapons-of-the-Future
ATT MOBILE PHONE at PARK CITY, Employees did contract Stan J. Caterbone with an ATT
Account for a HOTSPOT without his knowledge or consent.
Sprint Mobile Phone at Manor Shopping Center, Employees did act to increase the DATA
portion of Stan J. Caterbone's HOTSPOT device from 6 to 12 Gigabytes prior to reaching the
previous limit of 6 Gigabytes. A few days later, SPRINT MOBILE did INTERRUPT ALL SERVICE to
both the HOTSPOT and the Samsung Galaxy 6S, thereby leaving Stan J. Caterbone without
phone or internet access while his account was paid in full with no monies due.
Best Buy on Hempstead Road, Lancaster, PA
Hildey's Bar, Corner of East Frederick and North Mary Streets, Lancaster, PA On Sunday,
November 13, 2016 a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment
for no reason than to harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the
Disability Act, and other state and federal criminal and civil statutes.
The Juke Box and Owner John Katras, New Holland Avenue, Lancaster, PA, on every
occasion upon entering the establishment the black male staffer insisted on swiping Stan J.
Caterbone's Pennsylvania Drivers License, but did not swipe any other patrons.
On Friday,
November 4, 2016, First Friday, a Spanish Male did attempt to trap Stan J. Caterbone inside of
the Men's bathroom with all lights turned off, and in complete darkness. As with most visits to
the establishment, Stan J. Caterbone had to again leave in fear of his physical person, and left
while warning and threatening said black male at the door I will sue you.
Lancaster Fleet and Auto, 1309 Marshall Avenue, Lancaster, PA
Press Room, and LNP Enterprises, 30 West King Street, Lancaster, PA 17603, on a date in
the summer of 2016 a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment
ALLSTATE
INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Robert
Reeser,
Attorney,
Harrisburg,
PA,
said
DEFENDANTS did commit the act of fraud, extortion, and theft by deception by refusing to
Page 4 of 32
negotiate in good faith for the claim of vandalism and theft as formally and officially filed by Stan
J. Caterbone, in the amount of some $10,000.00.
Office Max, Red Rose Commons, Fruitville Pike, Lancaster, PA, as in the past, on just about
every visit to the establishment said employees did again engage in assault, battery,
harassment, theft of deception, etc.,. Stan J. Caterbone had previously won a settlement for the
same type of harassment in 2008 in the case of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP v. OfficeMax, Case
No. 07-CI-03924. Office Max was represented by MAYFIELD, TURNER, O'MARA, DONNELLY
& MCBRIDE of Philadelphia, while Stan J. Caterbone was Pro Se. The settlement was approved
by Lancaster County Common Pleas Judge James Cullen for some $2,000.00 for a single
incident.
Lancaster Regional Health System, Dr. Anthony Matropietro, 250 College Avenue,
Lancaster, PA, the acts of assault and battery were committed for refusing to prescribe pain
medication to Stan J. Caterbone.
Patient First Urgent Care, Lancaster, PA. 1625 Oregon Pike Lancaster, PA 17601, the acts of
assault and battery were committed for refusing to prescribe pain medication to Stan J.
Caterbone.
Altana Restaurant, 26 East King St, Lancaster, PA 17602, on a date in the summer of 2016
a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment for no reason than to
harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the Disability Act, and
other state and federal criminal and civil statutes.
Ben Frank and Amalfi Properties, 26 East King St, Lancaster, PA 17602,on a date in the
summer of 2016 a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment
foron a date in the summer of 2016 a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering
the establishment for no reason than to harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the
public access laws, the Disability Act, and other state and federal criminal and civil statutes. no
reason than to harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the
Tellus360 Bar and Restaurant, 24 East King St Lancaster, PA 17602, on a date in the
summer of 2016 a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment for
no reason than to harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the
Corty Byron, Musician of Tellus360, 24 East King St Lancaster, PA 17602, on a date in the
Annie Baileys Restaurant, 28-30 East King St Lancaster, PA 17602,
on a date in the
Page 5 of 32
Joshua Funk, co-owner of Annie Baileys, 28-30 East King St Lancaster, PA 17602, on a
date in the summer of
2016 a Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the
establishment for no reason than to harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public
access laws, the Disability Act, and other state and federal criminal and civil statutes.
Cigar Bar, 25 West King St, Lancaster, PA 17603, on a date in the summer of
2016 a
Bartender did prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment for no reason than to
harass, intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the Disability Act, and
other state and federal criminal and civil statutes.
Daniel Falcon, owner of the Cigar Bar, 25 West King St, Lancaster, PA 17603, on a date in
Lancaster Dispensing Company, 33 - 35 North Market St Lancaster, PA 17603,on a date in
Bradley DeForge and Judy Ross, owners of the Lancaster Dispensing Company, 33 35 North Market St Lancaster, PA 17603, on a date in the summer of
2016 a Bartender did
prevent Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment for no reason than to harass,
intimidate, and retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the Disability Act, and other state
and federal criminal and civil statutes.
Yorgos Bar and Restaurant, 66 North Queen Street, Lancaster, PA 17603, on a date in the
George Katsaros and Mrs. Katsaros, owners of Yorgos Bar and Restaurant, 66 North
Queen Street, Lancaster, PA 17603, on a date in the summer of 2016 a Bartender did prevent
Stan J. Caterbone from entering the establishment for no reason than to harass, intimidate, and
retaliate, thus violating the public access laws, the Disability Act, and other state and federal
criminal and civil statutes.
Date: November 16, 2016
/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone,

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
(717) 826-5354
Page 6 of 32
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- COMPLAINT OF
JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO
DATE
U.S. Supreme Court PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;
05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case
No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Case No. 16-10157
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of
misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to
selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would
normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further
libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for
justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue
our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be
removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and
Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control)?
Page 7 of 32
EXHIBIT
Page 8 of 32
(Typed Version of Original Handwritten Complaint of Decmeber 3, 2008)

OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL ACTION LAW
STAN J. CATERBONE
Plaintiffs
:
:
V.
DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER,
Lancaster County Library
Case No. 08-13373
:
at
Diane Pawling, Business Reference Librarian

at Duke Street Business Center
Bill Hudson, Deputy Administrator/IT Manager at :

Library System of Lancaster County
Lancaster Public Library of the
Lancaster County Library System
Lancaster County Library System
High Foundation
Unidentifed Reference Librarian at

Duke Street Business Center
Defendants
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 126.
Date: December 3, 2008
___________________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA
17603
717-669-2163
amgroup01@msn.com
Page 9 of 32
THE PARTIES
The Duke Street Business Center at the Lancaster County Library was created in partnership with
the Library System of Lancaster County.
It has been partially funded from the Federal Library Services
and Technology Act (LSTA), which funds are administered by the Office of Commonwealth (PA) Libraries
and from a start-up grant from the High Foundation and Dale High of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The Duke
Street Business Center continues to receive funding and support through the Lancaster County Library
System; which received most of it's operating budget from a grant from the Board of Commissioners of
Lancaster County.
The Duke Street Business Center is a separate glass faced room of approximately 450
square feet adjacent to the reference desk at the Lancaster County Library.
The Duke Street Business
Center mandate is to provide information resources, free of charge, to serve the following: start-up
business; growing businesses; not-for-profit and community organizations; job seekers; students; (and)
investors.
The Duke Street Business Center offers free unlimited wireless internet and resource
databases on three (3) desktops and two (2) laptop computers.

The Library System of Lancaster County in partnership with the Lancaster County Board of
Commissioners develops Biz Info to grow or B.I.G.. B.I.G. is a service to help grow business locally by
providing them with critical information needed to become and remain competitive.
Diane Pawling serves as the Business Reference Librarian at the Duke Street Business Center.
Bill
Hudson serves as the Deputy Administrator Information Technology Manager for the Library System of
Lancaster County and is responsible for administering the (computer) network and server that runs the
computers at the Duke Street Business Center.
The High Foundation is a not-for-profit organization founded by Lancaster County Convention
Center Partner Dale High and High Industries.
The Lancaster County Library is a member of the Lancaster County Library System.
Advanced Media Group is a Pennsylvania registered fictitious name with a home/office located in
Lancaster, Pennsylvania with it's place of business located in the City of Lancaster and is owned and
operated by Stan J. Caterbone.
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., is a Pennsylvania registered corporation
with 99% of the stock owned by Stan J. Caterbone.
The remaining interests are owned by recording
artist Sheryl Crow; actress Jenifer Aniston; and local residents Pamela Sue Pflumm and Mary Lynn Hobday
DiPaolo.
Advanced Media Group was formed in 1990 during a joint venture with High Industries and
American Helix (Technology Corporation).
Advanced Media Group was formed to provide products and
services and develop information technologies.
Advanced Media Group provides products and services to
U.S. government agencies; Fortune 500 companies; universities and education institutions; as well as non
profit organizations.
Advanced Media Group has sold to customers and clients in both the domestic
United States as well as countries worldwide.

Advanced Media Group maintains and administers the
Page 10 of 32
website
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
and
and
two
(2)
blogsites:
www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com.
Today Advanced Media Group conducts business in information technologies as well as management
consulting; entertainment; research; and not-for-profit and community service endeavors.
Stan J.
Caterbone also conducts services for Tom's Project Hope Foundation, which provides education and
awarness for mental illness and suicide prevention.
Tom's Project Hope was founded after the untimely
death of Thomas P. Caterbone in 1996.
Page 11 of 32
THE COMPLAINT
Begining in 2005 Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group had been utilizing the
Lancaster County Library and the Duke Street Business Center, especially the wireless and LAN internet
public access computers.
In 2005 Stan J. Caterbone filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for
the Estern District of Pennsylvania agains Fulton Bank; Mellon (Commonwealth) Bank; the Lancaster
County Prison; the Lancaster County Sheriff's Office; Manheim Township Police Department; Stone Harbor
Police Department; Avalon Police Department; and the Southern Regional Police Department.
no. 05-2288 is still ongoing.
The case
Several other complaints have since been filed in the same federal court.
Defendants also include the City of Lancaster and the County of Lancaster District Attorney's (Office).
Several other complaints have been filed in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
Stan J.
Caterbone appears as pro se in all civil matters.

Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group is alleging that the defendants have interfered
with business relations and contracts and exerted undo influence at the Duke Street Business Center
through a means of intimidation and harassment thereby creating an environment for other malicious
patrons to harass; intimidate; hack (computer) and intrude into sensitive and private electronic business
and legal files; delete and manipulate sensitive legal and business files; and also report false statements
to authorities resulting in libel and slander.
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group also allege obstruction of justice and due process
over the same time period.
The above acts resulted in interrupted and sabotaged business activities and projects; several
federal and state civil complaints; federal and state private criminal complaints; as well as emotional
duress.
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group seek damages in excess of $100,000 plus punitive
damages, as well as treble damages for anti-trust violations.
Date: December 3, 2008
Both seek a trial by jury.
___________________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA
17603
717-669-2163
amgroup01@msn.com
Page 12 of 32
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 13 of 32
DEFENDANTS LIST
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION
___________________________________________
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and

CASE NO. CI-08-13373
Plaintiffs v.
DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, et., al.
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMED PARTIES TO
1. Steve Midciff Ceo Lancaster Regional Hospital Lancaster Pa.;

2. Dr.Anthony Mastropietro Medical Director Lancaster Regional Hospital Lancaster,Pa.;
3. Linda S. Wenger Pa-C Lancaster Regional Hospital Lancaster Pa.;
4. Christine M.Dang M.D. Lancaster Regional Hospital Lancaster Pa.;
5. Mastropietro Associatesfamily Practice Noll Drive Lancaster Pa.;
6. BLack And Black Dental Willow St. Pa.;
7. Dr. John Black Iii Black And Black Dental Willow St. Pa.;
8. Southeast Health Clinic Brightside Baptist Church Lancaster Pa.;
9. Dr. Leo Dorizynski Psychiatry Department Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster Pa.;
10. Dr. Sean Coldren M.D. Psychiatry Department Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster Pa.;
11. Dr. Emily Pressley M.D. Psychiatry Department Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster Pa..;
12. Dr. Daniel Mcintyre M.D. Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster Pa.;
13. Lancaster General Hospital Department Of Psychiatry Lancaster Pa.;
14. Dr. Tate Lancaster Emergency Associates Of Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster Pa..;
15. Amy Millhouse Lancaster General Hospital Lancaster Pa.;
16. Officer Eric Mccrady, Lancaster City Bureau Of Police Lancaster Pa.;
17. Lancaster County Mental Health/Mental Retardation Department County Of Lancaster
Lancaster Pa.;
18. JAMES McLAUGHLIN DISRECTOR MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF LANCASTER LANCASTER PA.;
19. CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY;
20. MR. McCARDY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY'
21. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF LANCASTER PA.;
22. DENNIS STUCKEY CHAIRMAN BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF LANCASTER PA.;
23. HOUSE OF PASTA BAR & RESTAURANT MILLERSVILLE PIKE LANCASTER PA.;
24. YORGEY'S RESTAURANT & BAR NORTH QUEEN ST. LANCASTER PA.;
25. UPS COPY STORE STONE MILL PLAZA LANCASTER PA.;
26. ART WARD PROPERIETOR UPS COPY STORE STONE MILL PLAZA LANCASTER PA.;
27. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE TROOP J. LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST LANCASTER PA.;
28. COMMANDER PA. STATE POLICE TROOP J LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST LANCASTER PA.;
29. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(PENNDOT);
30. BEVERLY POINTS ESQ. LEGAL COUNSEL PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION;
31. LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS COUNTY OF LANCASTER PA.;
32. TERRY BERGMAN SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS COUNTY
OF LANCASTER PA.;
33. MARK REESE CHIEF DEPUTY LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS COUNTY OF
Page 14 of 32
LANCASTER PA. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE PRO SE. REINSTATED AS DIRECTED.
34. RANDALL O. WENGER PROTHONOTARY.
35. LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER COLLEGE AVENUE LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
36. DR. L. WENGER LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
37. WEIS MARKETS SADSBURY PENNSYLVANIA
38. WEIS PHARMACY SADSBURY PENNSYLVANIA
39. AMY BRENT PHARMICIST DISTRICT MANAGER WEIS MARKET
40. CVS PHARMACY MANOR SHOPPING CENTER LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
41. FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
42. FULTON BANK LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
43. MR. R. SCOTT SMITH CEO FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION
44. PHILLIP WENGER COO FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION
45. MR. CRAIG RODA CEO FULTON BANK
46. MS DANA CHRYST BOARD OF DIRECTORS FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION LANCASTER
47. GENERAL HOSPITAL
48. NEW HOLLAND DENTAL CLINIC NEW HOLLAND PENNSYLVANIA
49. DR. WEST NEW HOLLAND DENTAL CLINIC LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS INC. LANCASTER
PENNSYLVANIA
50. STEVE WEAVER MANAGER LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS
51. JOHN BUCKWALTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS
52. HIGH INDUSTRIES LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
53. FRANK MCCABE HIGH HOTELS
54. S. DALE HIGH HIGH INDUSTRIES
55. BARLEY SNYDER LLC. LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
56. SHAWN LONG ESQ. BARLEY SNYDER LLC
57. WGAL TV-8 LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
58. PAUL QUINN GENERAL MANAGER WGAL TV-8
59. DOUG ALLEN WGAL TV-8
60. JANELLE STELLSON WGAL TV-8
61. SUSAN SHIPIRO WGAL TV-8
62. BARBARA BARR WGAL TV-8
63. LANCASTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS LANCASTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
64. COPY MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX RED ROSE COMMONS LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
65. LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
66. RYAN P. AUMENT LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
67. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT
68. NURSE 1 OF JULY 13 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT
69. NURSE 2 OF JULY 13 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT
70. DR. VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
71. WACHOVIA BANK HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
72. BRANCH MANAGER WACHOVIA BANK HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS
LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
73. ANNIE BAILEYS RESTUARANT AND BAR
74. MARION COURTROOM RESTUARANT AND BAR
75. MARION STREET CAFE
76. MIKE GEESEY PROPRIETOR MARION COURTROOM
77. ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT
78. JOHN KATRAS PROPRIETOR ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT
79. BRETT STABLEY MANAGER ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT
80. ROSA ROSA RESTUARANT
81. THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB GEORGE SOUKAS MANAGER THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB
82. RUBY TUESDAY RESTUARANT BAR AND GRILL MANOR SHOPPING CENTER
Page 15 of 32
83. VALENTINOS CAFE LANCASTER

84. BRICKYARD BAR
85. LANCASTER COUNTY RESTUARANT ASSOCIATION
86. DAVID PFLUMM
87. PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK LIBERTY PLACE LANCASTER
88. LANCASTER EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY (LETA)
89. MARK SPRUNGER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LETA
90. RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RRTA)
91. DAVID KILMER RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY
92. LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU
93. KIETH SADDLER CHIEF OF POLICE LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU
94. SGT. RICHARD COSMORE LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU LANCASTER
95. CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
96. MR. MCGUIRE LANCASTER CITY HOUSING INSPECTION
97. DEPARTMENT AND NON-UNIFORMED UNION REPRESENTATIVE
98. LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION
99. RICHARD GRAY MAYOR CITY OF LANCASTER
100.
LANCASTER COUNTYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS
101.
WILLIAM RICHARD PLANK
102.
RESIDENTS OF 1200 BLOCK FREMONT STREET LANCASTER PA
103.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
104.
CRAIG STEDMAN LANCASTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY
105.
MICHAEL LANDIS DETECTIVE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY. OFFICE
106.
PRESIDENT JUDGE LOUIS FARINA LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
107.
JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
108.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
109.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE THOMAS CORBETT PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
110.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE FO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSLVANIA IN
PHILADELPHIA
111.
ERIC HOLDER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
112.
FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) HARRISBURG OFFICE
113.
FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) PHILADELPHIA OFFICE
114.
SHERYL CROW INTERSCOPE RECORDING ARTIST
115.
UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA)
116.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (D.O.D.)
117.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (DIA)
118.
ROBERT GATES UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
119.
BARRACK OBAMA UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
120.
DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAN PH.D. VICE PRESIDENT STUDENT AFFAIRS
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
121.
JODIE RICHARDSON SECRETARY OF STUDENT AFFAIRS MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
122.
LORI B. AUSTIN DIRECTOR OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
123.
VICTOR DESANTIS DIRECTOR GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEACH PROGRAM
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
124.
MARJORIE M. WARMKESSLER PH.D. HUMANTIES LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN
INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
125.
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
126.
NATHANIEL BOMBERGER LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT
127.
P. MICHAEL STURLA PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
128.
JOHN ROCHAT CHIEF OF POLICE MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
129.
MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Page 16 of 32
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 17 of 32
PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY

Katherine Wood-Jacobs
Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE (et al.)

vs.
DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER AT LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY (et al.)
Case Number
CI-08-13373
PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES

12/03/2008
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE.
12/03/2008
CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, STAN J. CATERBONE VS DUKE STREET
BUSINESS CENTER AT LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY, DIANE PAWLING BUSINESS REFERENCE
LINRARIAN OF DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, BILL HUDSON DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR/IT
MANAGER LIBRARY SYSTEM OF LANCASTER COUNTY, LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY,
LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM, HIGH FOUNDATION, UNIDENTIFIED BUSINESS
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER
12/03/2008
COMPLAINT FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
12/03/2008
COPY OF COMPLAINT(1) HANDED TO PLAINTIFF AT COUNTER ON 12/3/O8.
12/04/2008
EXHIBITS EXHIBIT C FILED. BY: STANLEY M. CATERBONE, PRO SE
12/08/2008
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008, UPON PRESENTATION
AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED INFORMATION, REGARDING THE REQUEST OF
STANLEY J. CATERBONE TO FILE IFP SAID REQUEST IS GRANTED. BY THE COURT: JOSEPH C.
MADENSPACHER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE TO: BEVERLY J. POINTS, ESQ., STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, (6)
12/31/2008
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT. COMPLAINT REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL

O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/28/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT. REINSTATED AS DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER,

PROTHONOTARY. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
02/09/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT C FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
02/11/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT D FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
02/12/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT E FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
02/20/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT F,G,H,I TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP.
02/26/2009

03/10/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT J FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/11/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT K FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/12/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT L FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT M FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/24/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT N FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/24/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.

REINSTATED AS REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
03/26/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT O FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT P FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
Page 18 of 32
(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.
04/01/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBITS Q;R;S;T;U;V FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/09/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A1 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/15/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) ENTERED AND FILED. AND NOW, THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, BASED UPON
THE ATTACHED FORENSIC REPORT, AND IT APPEARING THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS
ACCEPTED BY THE PROTHONOTARY FOR FILING WERE SIGNED IN HUMAN BLOOD, THE
PROTHONOTARY IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE FILING OF THOSE DOCUMENTS FROM THE CIVIL
DOCKET RECORD AND IT IS FURTHER DIRECTED THAT THEY REMAIN, IN THE INTEREST OF
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND FOR ANY APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, IN THE
CUSTODY OF THE OFFICE OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVES AND THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY. THE DOCUMENTS AT CI-08-13373 ARE: "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT W" , "MOTION TO
FILE EXHIBIT X" , "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Y" THE DOCUMENT AT CI-07-03924 IS: "MOTION TO
FILE EXHIBIT Z" UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF COURT NO DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLAINTIFF,
ACTING PRO SE, SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING UNTIL THEY HAVE BEEN INSPECTED BY AND
CLEARED AS FREE OF HEALTH HAZARDOUS TAINT BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. BY THE
COURT: LOUIS J. FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE COPIES W/236 NOTICE HAND DELIVERED TO:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JAN WALTERS, COUNTY DETECTIVE, RANDALL WENGER,
PROTHONOTARY, TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF, AND MAILED TO STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
04/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT W FILED BY: STANLELY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

FILING DATE APRIL 17, 2009 AT 11:41 A.M.)
04/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT Y FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
04/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT X FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
04/20/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, THE ORDER ISSUED APRIL
15, 2009 IS VACATED AND SUBSTITUTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: CORRECTIVE ORDER: AND
NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, BASED UPON THE ATTACHED FORENSIC REPORT, AND IT
APPEARING THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ACCEPTED BY THE PROTHONOTARY FOR
FILING WERE SIGNED IN HUMAN BLOOD, THE PROTHONOTARY IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE
FILING OF THOSE DOCUMENTS FROM THE CIVIL DOCKET RECORD AND IT IS FURTHER
DIRECTED THAT THEY REMAIN, IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND FOR
ANY APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, IN THE CUSTODY OF THE OFFICE OF THE
LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVES AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY. THE DOCUMENTS
DOCKETED TO CI-08-13373 ARE: "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT W" , "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT X",
"MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Y", AND "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Z". UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF
COURT NO DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLAINTIFF, ACTING PRO SE, SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR
FILING UNTIL THEY BEEN INSPECTED BY AND CLEARED AS FREE OF HEALTH HAZARDOUS
TAINT BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. BY THE COURT: LOUIS J. FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE,
COPIES W/236 NOTICE TO: DISTRICT ATTORNEY (HAND DELIVERED) / JAN WALTERS, COUNTY
DETECTIVE (HAND DELIVERED), RANDALL WENGER, PROTHONOTARY (IN FILE-CI-07-03924)
TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF (HAND DELIVERED), STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, (MAILED)
04/21/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A2 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/23/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT Z FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/23/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT ORGINALLY FILED ON DECEMBER 3, 2008 FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, PLAINTIFF
REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY
04/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-4 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-3 FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBITS A-5 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/30/2009
05/06/2009
05/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO RENAME EXHIBIT A-5 OF MAY 6, 2009 TO EXHIBIT A-7 FILED BY STAN J.
CATERBONE.
05/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-8 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE.
05/20/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-9 FILED.
05/22/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. REINSTATED AS

REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY
Page 19 of 32
(CORRECT
06/03/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-10. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/08/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-11. FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/09/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.

REINSTATED AS REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY AND ADD THE
FOLLOWING PARTIES TO THE CAPTION: DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAN, PH.D., VICE PRESIDENT
STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, JODIE RICHARDSON, SECRETARY OF STUDENT
AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B. AUSTIN, DIRECTOR OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS,
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR, GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEACH
PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE M. WARMKESSLER, PH.D. HUMANTIES
LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY,
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, NATHANIEL
BOMBERGER, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT, P. MICHAEL STURLA, PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, JOHN ROCHAT, CHIEF OF POLICE, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
06/09/2009
06/11/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBT A-13. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
Page 20 of 32
06/15/2009
AMENDED CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP / STAN J. CATERBONE VS. DUKE
STREET BUSINESS CENTER, ET AL, LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, COLLEGE
AVENUE, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, DR. L. WENGER, LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL
CENTER, WEIS MARKETS, SADSBURY, PENNSYLVANIA, WEIS PHARMACY SADSBURY,
PENNSYLVANIA, AMY BRENT, PHARMICIST, DISTRICT MANAGER, WEIS MARKET, CVS
PHARMACY, MANOR SHOPPING CENTER, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, FULTON FINANCIAL
CORPORATION, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, FULTON BANK, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, MR.
R. SCOTT SMITH, CEO, FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION, PHILLIP WENGER, COO, FULTON
FINANICAL CORPORATION, MR. CRAIG RODA, CEO FULTON BANK, MS DANA CHRYST, BOARD OF
DIRECTORS, FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEW
HOLLAND DENTAL CLINIC, NEW HOLLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, DR. WEST, NEW HOLLAND DENTAL
CLINIC, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, INC., LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, STEVE WEAVER,
MANAGER, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, JOHN BUCKWALTER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
CHAIRMAN, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, HIGH INDUSTRIES, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
FRANK MCCABE, HIGH HOTELS, S. DALE HIGH, HIGH INDUSTRIES, BARLEY SNYDER, LLC.,
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, SHAWN LONG, ESQ., BARLEY SNYDER, LLC, WGAL TV-8,
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL QUINN, GENERAL MANAGER, WGAL TV-8, DOUG ALLEN,
WGAL TV-8, JANELLE STELLSON, WGAL TV-8, SUSAN SHIPIRO, WGAL TV-8, BARBARA BARR,
WGAL TV-8, LANCASTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA, COPY MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, RED ROSE COMMONS, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER
GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 1 OF
JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2
OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR.
VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT,
WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
BRANCH MANAGER, WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA, ANNIE BAILEYS RESTUARANT AND BAR, MARION COURTROOM RESTUARANT
AND BAR, MARION STREET CAFE, MIKE GEESEY, PROPRIETOR, MARION COURTROOM, ALLEY
KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT, JOHN KATRAS, PROPRIETOR, ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT,
BRETT STABLEY, MANAGER, ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT, ROSA ROSA RESTUARANT,
THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, GEORGE SOUKAS, MANAGER, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, RUBY
TUESDAY, RESTUARANT BAR AND GRILL, MANOR SHOPPING CENTER, VALENTINOS CAFE,
LANCASTER BRICKYARD BAR, LANCASTER COUNTY RESTUARANT ASSOCIATION, DAVID
PFLUMM, PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK, LIBERTY PLACE, LANCASTER, LANCASTER
EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY (LETA), MARK SPRUNGER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LETA, RED
ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RRTA), DAVID KILMER, RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, KIETH SADDLER, CHIEF OF POLICE, LANCASTER CITY
POLICE BUREAU, SGT. RICHARD COSMORE, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, LANCASTER
CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, MR. MCGUIRE, LANCASTER CITY HOUSING
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND NON-UNIFORMED UNION, REPRESENTATIVE LANCASTER CITY
POLICE UNION, LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION, RICHARD GRAY, MAYOR , CITY OF
LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, WILLIAM RICHARD PLANK,
RESIDENTS OF 1200 BLOCK FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PA , LANCASTER COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, CRAIG STEDMAN, LANCASTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MICHAEL
LANDIS, DETECTIVE, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY. OFFICE, PRESIDENT JUDGE, LOUIS
FARINA, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN,
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL OFFICE, THOMAS CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL / UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY OFFICE FO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSLVANIA IN PHILADELPHIA, ERIC
HOLDER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI),
HARRISBURG OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI), PHILADELPHIA OFFICE,
SHERYL CROW, INTERSCOPE RECORDING ARTIST, UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY
AGENCY (NSA(, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (D.O.D.), DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (DIA), ROBERT GATES, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
Page 21 of 32
06/15/2009

REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY AND ADD THE FOLLOWING PARTIES TO
THE CAPTIONED: ANNIE BAILEYS RESTUARANT AND BAR, MARION COURTROOM RESTUARANT
DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
06/17/2009

REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
06/18/2009
COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
Page 22 of 32
06/18/2009

PROTHONOTARY. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMES
TO THE CAPTIONED COMPLAINT: LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, COLLEGE
COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
06/24/2009
06/26/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-15. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/29/2009
07/01/2009
07/02/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-18 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
07/07/2009
07/13/2009
07/14/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-21 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE.
07/14/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWNG PARTIES TO
THE COMPLAINT. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 1 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR. VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR
STREETS, LANCSTER, PENNSYLVANIA / BRANCH MANAGER, WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY
AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Page 23 of 32
07/14/2009
DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAN, PH.D.,
VICE PRESIDENT STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, JODIE RICHARDSON,
SECRETARY OF STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B. AUSTIN, DIRECTOR OF
JUDICIAL AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR, GRADUATE
STUDIES AND RESEACH PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE M. WARMKESSLER,
PH.D. HUMANTIES LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE
UNIVERSITY, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY,
NATHANIEL BOMBERGER, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT, P. MICHAEL STURLA, PENNSYLVANIA
Page 24 of 32
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JOHN ROCHAT, CHIEF OF POLICE, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH

POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
07/16/2009
07/17/2009
07/23/2009
07/28/2009
07/29/2009
08/03/2009
08/03/2009
08/05/2009
08/07/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMED PARTIES TO
THE COMPLAINT:STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR.
ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIN HOSPITAL, LANCASTER,
PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M.
DANG, M.D., LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES
FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.;
DR. JOHN BLACK III, BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC,
BRIGHTSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN COLDREN, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. EMILY
PRESSLEY, M.D., PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER,
PA..; DR. DANIEL McINTYRE, M.D., LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.;
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. TATE,
LANCASTER EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..;
AMY MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER CITY BURAEU OF POLICE, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER COUNTY MENTAL
HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER, PA.;
JAMES McLAUGHLIN, DISRECTOR, MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT,
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER, PA.; CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY;
MR. McCARDY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY' BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; DENNIS STUCKEY, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; HOUSE OF PASTA, BAR & RESTAURANT,
MILLERSVILLE PIKE, LANCASTER, PA.; YORGEY'S RESTAURANT & BAR, NORTH QUEEN ST.,
LANCASTER, PA.; UPS COPY STORE, STONE MILL PLAZA, LANCASTER, PA.; ART WARD,
PROPERIETOR, UPS COPY STORE, STONE MILL PLAZA, LANCASTER, PA.; PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE TROOP J. LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST, LANCASTER, PA.; COMMANDER, PA. STATE POLICE
TROOP J, LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST, LANCASTER, PA.; PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION(PENNDOT); BEVERLY POINTS, ESQ., LEGAL COUNSEL, PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS,
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; MARK REESE, CHIEF DEPUTY,
LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA. FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER,
PROTHONOTARY.
Page 25 of 32
08/07/2009
Page 26 of 32

POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL
DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIN HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M. DANG, M.D., LANCASTER
REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL
DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; DR. JOHN BLACK III,
BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC, BRIGHTSIDE
BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN COLDREN, M.D., PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; DR. DANIEL
McINTYRE, M.D., LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. TATE, LANCASTER
EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; AMY
MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.
08/11/2009
08/14/2009
08/20/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-32 FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, PLAINTIFF
08/31/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT AND TO KINDLY ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMED
PARTIES: LENS CRAFTERS; DR. JOHN H. BROADDUS & ASSOCIATES; CARTRIDGE WORLD;
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE; EYEMART EXPRESS STORE; DR. HARRY BREITMAN; OFFICE MAX
STORE; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA; LEON PANETTA, DIRECTOR CIA FILED BY STAN
J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE. REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, ESQ.
Page 27 of 32
08/31/2009
Page 28 of 32

POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL
DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIN HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M. DANG, M.D., LANCASTER
REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL
DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; DR. JOHN BLACK III,
BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC, BRIGHTSIDE
BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN COLDREN, M.D., PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; DR. DANIEL
McINTYRE, M.D., LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. TATE, LANCASTER
EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; AMY
MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.,LENS
CRAFTERS, LANCASTER, PA., DR. JOHN H. BROADDUS & ASSOCIATES, OPTOMETRISTS,
LANCASTER, PA., CARTRIDGE WORLD, LANCASTER, PA., KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE,
LANCASTER, PA., EYEMART EXPRESS STORE, LANCASTER, PA., DR. HARRY BREITMAN,
LANCASTER, PA., OFFICE MAX STORE #854, LANCASTER, PA., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, CIA, LANGLEY, VIRGINIA, LEON PANETTA, DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, LANGLEY, VIRGINIA
09/03/2009
09/16/2009
09/16/2009
09/29/2009
09/29/2009

10/02/2009
10/06/2009
10/13/2009
10/16/2009
10/19/2009
10/21/2009
10/23/2009
10/28/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT. FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
10/30/2009
11/10/2009
11/20/2009
Page 29 of 32
11/20/2009
11/20/2009
11/25/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
12/09/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-49 WITH CD-ROM AS EXHIBIT FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO
SE.
12/18/2009

12/18/2009
12/29/2009
12/29/2009
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (EMERGENCY) FOR RELIEF. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE,

PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
12/29/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009, UPON
CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR
RELIEF, THE REQUEST IS DENIED. PA. R.C.P. 1531(A) PROVIDES, THAT A COURT MAY ISSUE AN
EX PARTE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ONLY AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE AND HEARING UNLESS IT
APPEARS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT IMMEDIATE AND IRREPARABLE INJURY
WILL BE SUSTAINED BEFORE NOTICE CAN BE GIVEN OR A HEARING HELD, IN WHICH CASE THE
COURT MAY ISSUE (THE) INJUNCTION WITHOUT A HEARING OR WITHOUT NOTICE. IN
DETERMINING WHETHER (THE) INJUNCTION SHOULD BE GRANTED AND WHETHER NOTICE OR
A HEARING SHOULD BE REQUIRED, THE COURT MAY ACT ON THE BASIS OF THE AVEMENTS OF
THE PLEADINGS OR PETITION AND MAY CONSIDER AFFIDAVITS OF PARTIES OR THIRD
PERSONS OR ANY OTHER PROOF WHICH THE COURT MAY REQUIRE. HERE, THE IRREPARABLE
HARM ALLEGED IS LOSS BY PLAINTIFF OF (1) PERSONAL PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE; (2)
OPPORTUNITY TO SECURE PERSONAL PROPERTY, BUSINESS ASSETS, AND COURT RELATED
ASSETS, INFORMATION, AND EVIDENCE; (3) PROTECTION FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT AT EVERY
LEVEL [:] LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL; (4) RELATIONSHIPS INCLUDING FAMILY [,] FRIENDS [,]
AND PROFESSIONAL; (5) TIME AND LIFE AS A NORMAL PERSON WOULD KNOW IT; (6) TIME WITH
MOTHER, WHO IS IN HER LAST STAGE OF LIFE. . .; (7) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT [:]
COMPLAINANT HAS BEEN DENIED EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO SECURE HIS PERSONAL AND
BUSINESS ASSETS AT 1250 FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA [,] MAKING IT
IMPOSSIBLE TO TRAVEL OR LEAVE FOR ANY AMOUNT OF TIME. . .; (8) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
MAY CONSTITUTE FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND MAY INVOKE THE FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS
LAWS OF FREEDOM [SIC]; (9) FEMALE COMPANIONSHIP; (10) BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES; AND
(11) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES. THE SOURCES OF THE ALLEGED IRREPARABLE HARM ARE
APPROXIMATELY 82 DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, ELECTED OFFICIALS,
PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESS OF VARIOUS TYPES, MEDICAL PRACTICES AND
PRACTITIONERS, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS AND NUMEROUS PRINCIPLES, EMPLOYEES
AND AGENTS OF THE NAMED ENTITIES, WHICH ARE NAMED IN A PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
MADE PART OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. IN HIS REQUEST
FOR RELIEF,: THE COMPLAINANT SEEKS IMMEDIATE RELIEF FROM THE ABOVE IN THE FORM OF
SANCTIONS AND FINES FOR THOSE GUILTY OF EXTORTATION AND EMBEZZLEMENT AND
THOSE WITHHOLDING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES. COMPLAINANT SEEKS IMMEDIATE RELIEF
FROM THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT CONTINUE ABUSE OF PROCESS.
COMPLAINANT SEEKS IMMEDIATE RELIEF FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOUND GUILTY OF
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND DUE PROCESS. COMPLAINANT SEEKS RELIEF, IN AS MUCH AS THE
COURTS ARE ABLE, WITH REGARDS TO THE HARASSMENT AND TORTURE FROM THOSE
FOUND GUILTY OF SUCH CRIMES. GIVEN THE STRICT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE ENTRY
OF EX PARTE RELIEF, THIS COURT CANNOT SAY THAT THE ALLEGATIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S
PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PROVIDE A CREDIBLE FACTUAL BASIS ON WHICH TO GRANT
RELIEF. WHILE PLAINTIFF MAY BELIEVE THE FACTUAL AVEMENTS AND LEGAL
TRANSGRESSIONS TO BE PROVEN, THERE IS NO EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT PROVIDED TO THE
COURT. MOREOVER, IN MANY INSTANCES, THE HARM CITED AND RELIEF REQUESTED ARE NOT
RATIONALLY RELATED TO THE PERSONS/ENTITIES IDENTIFIED, OR THEIR ALLEGED ACTS OR
OMISSIONS. WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE PERSON OR ENTITY SOUGHT TO BE ENJOINED, A
CLEARER STATEMENT OF THE SPECIFIC HARM AND NEXUS BETWEEN THE ACTOR'S BEHAVIOR,
AND AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AT WHICH ALL PARTIES MAY PRESENT PROOFS, INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF WILL NOT LIE. BY THE COURT: MARGARET C. MILLER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE
TO: STAN J. CATERBONE (1). MAILED ON 12/30/09.
Page 30 of 32
01/04/2010
MOTION PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATIOIN FOR EX PARTE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF OF ORDER DATED DECEMBER 29, 2009
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (FORWARDED TO JUDGE MILLER ON JAN. 4, 2010)
01/06/2010
01/07/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
01/11/2010
01/19/2010
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2010, UPON CONSIDERATION
OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR EX PARTE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF OF ORDER DATED DECEMBER 29,
2009, THE REQUEST IS DENIED. BY THE COURT: MARGARET C. MILLER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236
NOTICE TO: STAN J. CATERBONE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (1). MAILED ON 1/21/10.
01/19/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/22/2010
02/05/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-55 PLUS C-D ROM FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
02/16/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE.
02/18/2010
02/19/2010
02/22/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-58 FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
03/04/2010
03/09/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-61 FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/09/2010
03/10/2010
03/10/2010
03/17/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE PRAECIPE EXHIBIT A-64 FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE,
DEFENDANT.
03/18/2010
03/19/2010
03/31/2010
04/01/2010
04/20/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATTERBONE.
04/27/2010
05/03/2010
05/11/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, ProSe.
08/31/2015
PRAECIPE, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
09/01/2015
PRAECIPE REINSTATE COMPLAINT, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, FILED BY STAN J.

CATERBONE
09/02/2015
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT TITLED "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT", FILED BY STAN J.
CATERBONE
09/10/2015
PRAECIPE, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
09/10/2015
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY KATHERINE WOOD JACOBS, PROTHONOTARY.
09/22/2015
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
09/30/2015
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE: KINDLY REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT ORIGINALLY FILED ON

DECEMBER 3, 2008 IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTION ALONG WITH THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A.
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
Page 31 of 32
10/02/2015
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE: KINDLY REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT ORIGINALLY FILED ON

DECEMBER 3, 2008 IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTION ALONG WITH THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT.
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
02/03/2016
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL: TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES

WITH AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
SENT TO JUDGE REINAKER ON 2/5/2016.
02/10/2016
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED.

AND NOW, THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED
PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS, IT IS HEREBY DENIED.
BY THE COURT: DENNIS E. REINAKER, PRESIDENT JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ESQ., ON 2/10/16.
02/10/2016
IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED.
05/12/2016
Praecipe to file exhibit-Corroborating Expert And Former Nsa Whistleblower Karen Stewart's Disclosure
Of Electrogagnetic Weapons Used To Kill May 12 - Copy filed by Stan Caterbone
November 10, 2016
Page 32 of 32
File & ServeXpress Basic
https://secure.fileandservexpress.com/Basic/authorize.asp?dowhat=print...
File & ServeXpress Transaction Receipt

Authorized by: Stan Caterbone
Submitted by: Stan Caterbone
Pro Se
Pro Se
Transaction ID: 59840565

Transaction Option: File in an Existing Case
Authorized: Nov 16 2016 2:51AM EST
Court: PA Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas
Case Type: General Civil Action
Case Number:
Case Class: Civil

Case Name: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS DUKE ST
BUSINESS CENTER
CI-08-13373
Transaction Document List

Document Title
Public/Sealed
Document
Type
Stat.
Fee
Conversion
Status
Pages
Review
Status
Original
Lancaster County Court Case No.

08-CI-13373 CATERBONE v. Duke Street
Business Center, et.al., re PRAECIPE TO
ADD DEFENDANTS Filed on November 16,
2016
No request for
seal
Praecipe
$0.00
Converted
32
Pending
Original
File
Review History For Document: Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business
Center, et.al., re PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS Filed on November 16, 2016
Review
Status
Pending
Reviewer Date
Reason
Description
11/16/2016
Product/Service
Filing
(32 Pages Submitted)
Reviewer
Comment
Document
created
Document
Type
Document Title
Access
Type
Praecipe
Lancaster County Court Case No.

08-CI-13373 CATERBONE v. Duke
Street Business Center, et.al., re
PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS Filed
on November 16, 2016
Public
Fee
Total
$7.00
Total File & ServeXpress charges for Transaction 59840565:
1 of 1
Sales Tax
$0.00
11/16/2016 2:54 AM

Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-Ci-13373 Exhibit Re Current State of Affairs and Motion For Summary Judgment November 17, 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-Ci-13373 Exhibit Re Current State of Affairs and Motion For Summary Judgment November 17, 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gmail - Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59847465 Transaction Receipt

Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>

Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59847465 Transaction Receipt

Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:27 AM

To: Stan J Caterbone

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

1250 Fremont Street

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CI-08-13373

EXHIBIT re CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS

THE APPEALLANT REQUESTS THE

1. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION - Monday

Case No. CI-08-13373

Case No. CI-08-13373

CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

Case No. CI-08-13373

document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or

Case No. CI-08-13373

Dated November 17, 2016

1250 Fremont Street

Case No. CI-08-13373

ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED IN MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Even the probability of unfairness can result in a defendant being deprived

Case No. CI-08-13373

preceding pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.

Case No. CI-08-13373

The RICO laws can be alleged in cases

RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December 2004).

Case No. CI-08-13373

Date: November 17, 2016

1250 Fremont Street

Case No. CI-08-13373

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Thursday November 17, 2016

Thursday November 17, 2016

Case No. CI-08-13373

Thursday November 17, 2016

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Congressional Findings and Declaration of Purposes

Case No. CI-08-13373

Thursday November 17, 2016

Federal Guidelines for Treatment of Crime Victims and Witnesses in the

Case No. CI-08-13373

Thursday November 17, 2016

Case No. CI-08-13373

Thursday November 17, 2016

Gmail - Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59840565 Accepted w/Edits

Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>

Case: CI-08-13373; Transaction: 59840565 Accepted w/Edits

Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM

To: Stan Caterbone

Thank you for using File & ServeXpress.

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

1250 Fremont Street

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CI-08-13373

DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, et. al.,

PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS

which states "A writ may be reisued or a complaint reinstated at

Case No. CI-08-13373 PRAECIPE

Wednesday November 16, 2016

1. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION - Monday

3. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of