Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Analytical equations were derived to determine the undrained lateral bearing capacity of rigid piles in cohesive soil. Piles in level
ground and piles placed at a distance from the crest of a slope were examined, taking account of the effect of the adhesion at the pilesoil
interface. The derived analytical solutions were used to develop charts relating the lateral pile capacity to the pile length/diameter ratio,
the pilesoil adhesion, the distance of the point of load application from the ground to the pile diameter ratio, the inclination of the
slope and the distance of the pile from the crest of the slope to the pile diameter ratio. They were also used to derive a reduction factor
which, when multiplied by the lateral bearing capacity for level ground, gives the bearing capacity of the same pile near a slope.
In addition, a critical non-dimensional distance between the pile and the crest of the slope, at which the bearing capacity approaches that
for a level ground, was determined. The bearing capacity charts obtained for level ground were compared to the classic Broms charts
and to others derived using several different lateral earth pressure distributions along the pile. Comparisons were also made between the
results of the proposed method for piles near slopes and those obtained from charts based on upper bound calculations. Finally, the
proposed new method was validated through a comparison with the results of a large number of pile load tests, in which a remarkable
agreement was observed between the analytical results and the measurements.
& 2013 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Piles; Lateral loads; Bearing capacity; Clay; Soilpile interactions; Slopes
1. Introduction
Short rigid piles or drilled shafts are often used to
transfer horizontal loads to the ground from structures
such as highway signs, trafc signals, sound barriers,
transmission towers, wind turbines, etc., placed near the
edge of a slope. In contrast to conventional long exible
piles, the design of these low length/diameter (L/D) piles is
n
0038-0806 & 2013 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.12.010
10
12
14
16
z/ D
Eq. 2 ( = 1)
Eq. 2 ( = 0.5)
Eq. 2 ( = 0)
Broms
10
Broms simpified
Hansen
Stevens & Audibert
12
14
16
145
Jeanjean
Fig. 1. Variation in lateral bearing capacity factor with depth for level
ground.
ay 1
siny1 siny
2
146
Np
Npo
Npc
Npu
zc /D
zo
z/D
Hu
Z
eHu
zo
zpu dz
zo
pu dz
zo
pu dz
zpu dz
9
where
Fig. 2. Schematic variation in bearing capacity factor with depth for
sloping ground.
a1 Npu ; a2 Npu e=D ; a3 2 Npu Npo 1=l e=D ;
a4 2 Npu Npo =l
Np
0
10
12
14
16
Npu = 11.94
b/D = 0.5
b/D =
z/D
b/D = 1.5
b/D = 4.5
b/D = 2.5
b/D = 5.5
b/D = 3.5
b/D = 6.5
10
Equation 2
Equation 4
12
Fig. 3. Typical effect of b/D, y and a on Np: (a) a1, y451 and (b) a 0.3, b/D 1.5.
Hu
60
Eq. 10 ( = 0, 0.5, 1)
147
pu = NpcuD
Broms
zo
Stewart
50
Meyerhof
H1
Hansen
=1
Jeanjean
H2
= 0.5
Matlock/Bhushan et al/
Reese and Welch
40
zr / D =2.5
=0
and
Hu/cuD2
zr / D = 5
30
zr / D =10
zr / D =15
20
L2
eL
2
2
D
2D
Npu Npo e 1
L 1 e lL=D
e
D l
D l D
l
a5 Npu
max M e zm
Hu cu D
l
2
l
11
0
0
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 5. Lateral bearing capacity of piles in level ground for e/D0.
16
Eq. 10 ( = 0, 0.5, 1)
=1
Broms
14
= 0.5
Stewart
Meyerhof
zr / D =2.5
Hansen
12
10
Hu/cu D2
N
2
e
1
pu
2
cu D
D D
l
10
10
Jeanjean
=0
Matlock/Bhushan et al/
Reese and Welch
zr / D = 5
zr / D =10
zr / D =15
0
0
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 6. Lateral bearing capacity of piles in level ground for e/D16.
148
0.25 and 0.5, Reese and Welch suggest 0.5 and Bhushan
et al. suggest 2), and is given by the following equation:
zr
6D
gD=cu J
12
zo
b
Hu
Hu
H11
zc
L
H12
zo
pu = NpcuD
(Np from Eq. 2)
(Np from Eq. 6)
H2
b
Hu
Hu
pu = NpcuD
(Np from Eq. 2)
zo
zc
H2
H1
zpu dz
eHu
zo
zo
zc
zpu dz
zc
zpu dz
14
a1 Npu ; a2 2Npu e=D ; a3 Npu Npo 1=l e=D =l;
Npu Npc 1
e lay zc =D
a4 Npu Npo =l; a5
;
e
lay D
lay
Npu Npc lay zc =D
;
a6
e
lay
2
Npu Npo 1 e
L
Le
a7 Npu
l D
2D2 D2
l
Npu Npo L 1 e -lL=D
e
D l D
l
Npu Npc zc
1
e
lay
D lay D
Npu Npo zc 1 e lzc =D
e
l
D l D
The horizontal force equilibrium equation (Eq. 13), for
the zo/D value derived from Eq. (15), yields non-dimensional
lateral bearing capacity Hu/cuD2.
2
Hu
c1 zo =D c2 c3 zo =D el zo =D
2
cu D
c4 c5 zo =D elay zo =D c6
16
where
c1 Npu D=e ; c2 Npu Npo D=e =l2 ;
c3 Npu Npo D=e =l;
Npu Npc
c4
D=e elay zc =D ;
2 2
l ay
Npu Npc
c5
D=e elay zc =D ;
" lay
c6
D Npu L 2 Npu Npo Npu Npo
L
1
elL=D
2 D
e
D
l2
l2
Npu Npo zc
Npu Npc zc Npu Npc
lzc =D
1
e
D
lay
D
l2
l2 a2y
40
b/D =
b/D = 2
b/D = 0.5
e/D = 0
Hu/cu D2
30
e/D = 4
20
e/D = 16
10
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 8. Lateral bearing capacity of smooth piles (a 0) near 1:1 slope.
50
b/D =
b/D = 2
b/D = 0.5
Hu/cu D2
40
e/D = 0
30
e/D = 4
20
e/D = 16
10
0
0
10
149
12
14
L/D
Fig. 9. Lateral bearing capacity of rough piles (a 1) near 1:1 slope.
40
b/D = 4
b/D =
b/D = 2
e/D = 0
b/D = 0.5
0.9
Hu/cu D2
30
b/D = 2
e/D = 4
rH 0.8
b/D = 1
20
b/D = 0.5
e/D = 16
10
0.7
=0
=1
0.6
0
0
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 10. Lateral bearing capacity of smooth piles (a 0) near 1:2 slope.
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 11. Bearing capacity reduction factor for piles near 1:1 slope
(e/D 0).
150
1.0
b/D = 4
b/D = 2
0.9
b/D = 1
rH 0.8
b/D = 0.5
0.7
=0
=1
0.6
0
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 12. Bearing capacity reduction factor for piles near 1:1 slope
(e/D16).
1.0
b/D = 4
b/D = 2
0.9
b/D = 2
b/D = 1
b/D = 0.5
0.9
b/D = 1
rH 0.8
b/D = 0.5
rH 0.8
0.7
proposed
Stewart (1999)
0.7
0.6
0
=0
=1
0.6
10
12
10
12
14
L/D
14
L/D
Fig. 13. Bearing capacity reduction factor for piles near 1:2 slope
(e/ D 0).
Fig. 14. Comparison of reduction factors for smooth piles near 1:1 slope
(e/D 0).
1.0
b/D = 4
b/D = 2
b/D = 1
0.9
b/D = 0.5
rH 0.8
0.7
proposed
Stewart (1999)
0.6
10
12
14
L/D
Fig. 15. Comparison of reduction factors for smooth piles near 1:2 slope
(e/D 0).
1:1,e/D = 0
40
=1
= 0.5
=0
L/D = 10
Hu/cu D2
30
L/D = 8
20
L/D = 6
1:1,e/D = 16
1:1,e/D = 0
1:1,e/D = 16
1:2,e/D = 0
1:2,e/D = 16
1:2,e/D = 0
1:2,e/D = 16
bc /D
2
=1
=0
1
0
L/D = 4
10
L/D = 2
b/D
Fig. 16. Effect of distance from crest on lateral bearing capacity for 1:1
slope (e/D 0).
10
15
20
25
L/D
Fig. 17. Effect of inclination, adhesion, L/D and e/D on critical distance.
151
26
r 1 cu in kPa
cu
17
152
Table 1
Comparison to pile test results.
L (m)
e (m)
y (1)
cu (kPa)
Hum (kN)
Huc (kN)
Huc (kN) (a 0)
Reference
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
0.61
0.61
1.22
1.22
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.91
0.91
0.305
0.305
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.915
4.58
4.58
3.81
3.81
4.73
4.73
2.71
4.73
5.18
6.71
1.48
0.93
1.40
1.0
4.78
2.65
2.56
6.1
4.57
1.83
3.05
1.83
3.05
4.27
1.83
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
1.50
1.05
1.50
1.05
1.32
3.05
3.08
0.79
0.79
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
263.5
263.5
227.5
227.5
227.5
227.5
227.5
227.5
220
479
60
60
60
60
81
153
152
100
100
36
32
36
32
28
36
3631
3004
2094
2373
2657
3156
989
1891
2180
5347
45
16
33
20
601
316
311
1165
741
67
82.5
88.5
182
185
124
3161
3161
2109
2109
2861
2841
839
1792
2835
5361
39
19.5
35
22.6
606
268
247
1362
886
59
102
94
168
227
125
2839
2839
1882
1882
2567
2567
752
1611
2518
4677
32.5
16
29
18.5
523
236
218
1183
768
47
81.5
73.5
133
182.8
94.5
1533
1533
783
783
1435
1435
471
1366
15
2.1
12.5
3.4
416
119
105
953
536
36
73
28.5
92.5
150
9.5
D (m)
20
15
10
5
for = 0.21 + 26/cu[kPa]
for = 0
Broms' method
0
0
10
15
20
25
153
References
8. Conclusions
A method for the analytical computation of the ultimate
bearing capacity of free-head piles in level ground and near
the crest of clay slopes was developed. The derived
equations consider the effect of pilesoil adhesion on the
lateral earth pressure along the pile and the bearing
capacity reduction caused by the pile proximity to the
slope. The method was used to develop Hu/cuD2 versus
L/D charts.
For piles in level ground, the lateral bearing capacity
increased signicantly with an increase in adhesion factor a.
The bearing capacities computed with the new method for
different values of a fall well within the range of values
obtained using the lateral load distributions adopted by
several other researchers. For smooth piles (a 0), the new
method is in good agreement with Broms method (except
for low L/D values) and the bearing capacities calculated
Bhushan, K., Haley, S.C., Fong, P.T., 1979. Lateral load tests on drilled
piers in stiff clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division 105
(8), 969985 ASCE.
Bierschwale, M.W., Coyle, H.M., Bartoskewitz, R.E., 1981. Lateral load
test on drilled shafts founded in clay. Drilled piers and caissons, Proc.
of a Session at the ASCE National Convention, St. Louis, Missouri,
pp. 98112.
Broms, B.B., 1964. Lateral resistance of piles in cohesive soils. Journal of
Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 90 (2), 2763 ASCE.
Chae, K.S., Ugai, K., Wakai, A., 2004. Lateral resistance of short single
piles and pile groups located near slopes. International Journal of
Geomechanics 4 (2), 93103 ASCE.
Chin, F.K., 1970. Estimation of the ultimate load on piles not carried to
failure. In: Proceedings of the second Southeast Asia Conference on
Soil Engineering, 8190.
Georgiadis, K., Georgiadis, M., 2010. Undrained lateral pile response in
sloping ground. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering 136 (11), 14891500 ASCE.
Georgiadis, K., Georgiadis, M., 2012. Development of py curves for
undrained response of piles near slopes. Computers and Geotechnics
40, 5361.
154
Hansen, B.J., 1961. The ultimate resistance of rigid piles against transversal
forces. The Danish Geotechnical Institute, Bulletin 12, 516.
Jeanjean, P., 2009. Re-Assessment of PY curves for soft clays from
centrifuge testing and nite element modeling. Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, OTC 20158, 123.
Kulhawy, F.H., 1991. Drilled shaft foundations. In: Fang, H.Y. (Ed.),
Foundation Engineering Handbook. Chapman and Hall, New York,
pp. 537552.
Matlock, H., 1970. Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft
clay. In: Proceedings of the Second Offshore Technology Conference,
Houston, OTC 1204, 577594.
McDonald, P., 1999. Laterelly loaded pile capacity re-visited. In:
Proceedings of the Eighth Australia-New Zealand Conference on
Geomechanics, Hobart, vol. 1, 421427.
Meyerhof, G.G., Mathur, S.K., Valsangkar, A.J., 1981. Lateral resistance
and deection of rigid walls and piles in layered soils. Canadian
Geotechnical Journal 18 (1), 159170.
Mezazigh, S., Levacher, D., 1998. Laterally loaded piles in sand: slope effect
on py reaction curves. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 35 (3), 433441.
Murff, J.D., Hamilton, J.M., 1993. P-Ultimate for undrained analysis of
laterally loaded piles. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 119 (1),
91107 ASCE.
Nimityongskul, N., Ashford, S., 2010. Effect of soil slope on lateral
capacity of piles in cohesive soils. In: Proceedings Ninth US National
and Tenth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Toronto, Paper no. 366.
Nusairat, J., Liang, R.Y., Engel, R., Hanneman, D., Abu-Hajleh, N.,
Yang, K., 2004. Drilled Shaft Design for Sound Barrier Walls, Signs
and Signals, Colorado Department of Transportation, Report no.
CDOT-DTD-R-2004-8.
Puppala, A.J., Wejrungsikul, T., Williammee, R.S., Witherspoon, T.,
Hoyos, L. 2011. Design of Inclined Loaded Drilled Shafts in HighPlasticity Clay Environment. Technical Report FHWA/TX - 11/0
6146 - 1, Univ. of Texas at Arlington/ Texas Dept. of Transportation.
Randolph, M.F., Houlsby, G.T., 1984. The limiting pressure on a circular
pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil. Geotechnique 34 (4), 613623.
Reese, L.C., Cox, W.R., Koop, F.D., 1975. Field testing and analysis of
laterally loaded piles in stiff clay. In: Proceedings of the Seventh
Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, OTC 2312, pp. 671690.
Reese, L.C., Welch, R.C., 1975. Lateral loading of deep foundations in
stiff clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division 101 (7),
633649 ASCE.
Stevens, J.B., Audibert, J.M.E., 1980. Re-examination of py curve
formulation, Proceedings of Eleventh Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, OTC 3402, pp. 397403.
Stewart, D.P., 1999. Reduction of undrained lateral pile capacity in clay
due to an adjacent slope. Australian Geomechanics 34 (4), 1723.