09/08/2015

To Whom It May Concern

In response to your letter dated August 28, 2015 docket number 1268 I am a little confused.
Isn't the email evidence enough to reprimand Judge Lori Fleming?
First and foremost the question we the people would like to know is whether Judge Lori
Fleming already admitted to sending the email or whether she denied sending the email?
Also, did attorney William (Bill) Wachter admit to receiving the email or not?
If she admitted she sent the email and/or other related emails then let's start formal
proceedings against her as soon as possible.
If she claims she did not send this subject matter email then proof of additional emails
contradicting her position might be necessary.
For now, if you seriously want to investigate Judge Lori Fleming then all you have to do is
confiscate the court emailing depository or server, her computer(s) and/or the recipient(s)
computer(s) and/or recipient(s) email server.
Has this commission not previously relied on forensic computer analysis to gather evidence
as seen in the Matter of Robertson, 120 P.3d 790, 795 (Kansas 2005)?
Why not do the same here?
One great starting point is to do a thorough investigation as to yet another email Judge Lori
Fleming sent in early 2014 knowingly, maliciously, intentionally and with bad faith intent to
imprison, and basically retaliate against a pro se litigant who had sued her.
Inexperienced Judge Lori Fleming is the same judge who allegedly lied to a federal
prospector Alan G. Metzger (or conspired with Metzger?????) in a Wichita Federal case that
she and another female court staff were being stalked by James Donald Russian.
Where is the police indecent report on this (unless they can now manufacture one out of
thin air) and/or where is the video evidence of this since the court building has cameras
surrounding the entire building? Of course, there is no such evidence of any stalking and none
will ever be produced.
Lori Fleming is an out of control young and very inexperienced Judge!
Unethical Judge Lori Bolton Fleming's blatant lie is the only reason James Donald Russian
was denied bail and has been held in federal prison since February 2014 until his sentence
hearing yesterday September 3rd, 2015.
Listen to the Feb 24, 2014 detention/bond hearing where it is alleged Judge Lori Fleming
sent yet another email - this time with an alleged obvious stalking lie! You can jump to the

21:42 minute mark onwards to hear for yourself how the blatant lie and misuse of office led to
Mr. James Russian eventually being denied bail:
U.S. vs. James Russian Feb 24, 2014 Hearing [ Wichita, Kansas ]
Case Number 14-10018 U.S. Distinct Court
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOx38H6rEGk
or use this shortened URL for the video/audio: https://goo.gl/5rhXIc
The general public is very aware of judge Lori Fleming's numerous ethic violations as seen
on www.conflictgate.com and discussed on dinner tables and ball parks across the area. We
remind the commission that the most serious aggravating factor here is a severe erosion of
public confidence in the judiciary.
The summary Judgment group has already publicly censored Judge Lori Bolton Fleming. We
don't need the commission for that.
The public has no confidence in a judiciary where judges call self represented litigants
terrorists!
Judge Lori Fleming's record breaking docketed complaints and several prior cautions or/and
informal advice from the commission itself reflects not mere lapses or errors in judgment but a
wholesale failure of inexperienced Judge Lori Fleming's duty, reflecting an indifference if not
cynicism toward her judicial office and since the public has also expressed its choice to have a
system of discipline which can result in a judges removal from office she needs to be fired!
----------------------------------------------------------There is also a question of whether or not this commission can be impartial given that we
have a pending injunctive lawsuit against the commission for what we believe is the
commission's own unethical actions, and disturbing conflict of interest with judges.
Since there is not even the appearance of a fake separation between the commission and
state employees given that you all use the same law firm (the attorney general's office) then it
appears all the commission does therefore is to protect state employees, and not hold them
accountable.
Isn't the hidden agenda of the commission to give the illusion is that the commission is
actively looking to reprimand unethical judges for their misdeeds while the truth is that you
promote and encourage unethical judicial misconduct by protecting them from valid
complaints.
It is now a proven fact that the commission has a grotesque history of telling complainants
that their complaints "contained no facts evidencing judicial misconduct as defined in the Code
of Judicial Conduct and was dismissed" while at the very same time doing two things
unbeknown to the complainant/litigant: (1) proudly putting the real disciplinary action the

commission took against the judge(s) in their annual report, (2) sending a completely different
'disciplinary' letter cautioning, or reprimanding the Judge(s) and squarely telling the Judge(s)
that it is for their eyes only.
The public has no confidence in a commission that has resulted to such low levels of
unethical behavior.

Sincerely,
By: /s/Eric M. Muathe

Eric M. Muathe