Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.scdag.com
AMY WEIRICH
@AmyWeirichDA ShelbyCountyDA
Contact:
Shelby County District Attorney
901-222-1503 desk
901-222-1305 fax
info@scdag.com
LAY WITNESSES
There were numerous lay witnesses, but none saw the entire incident, or the fatal shooting.
was westbound on South Parkway and saw a police officer and a deputy chasing the driver
who had something in his hand that appeared to be blue. He heard pop, pop followed by pop, pop,
pop, pop. He saw the driver running from police and dirt flying up around his feet. The deputy was
still chasing him, while the police officer was on the ground crawling toward the church. He thought
the officer had been hit.
When the light turned green and traffic began to move,
saw the officer getting up. He saw
the suspect crawling on the ground toward a car parked beside the church, still moving to get away.
He said he heard at least 15 to 17 shots.
. and
were in a vehicle that was struck by the gold Chevrolet as it turned in front
of them at South Parkway and Mississippi Boulevard. They said the Chevrolet then struck a second
vehicle.
said the two men in the Chevrolet got out and ran in opposite directions. He said one
man ran in front of the church and that when he was out of sight there were about 10 gunshots from
two different guns, since one was louder than the other.
said he saw two police officers chasing
the driver and then heard about 20 gunshots. He said he heard several rapid shots, then slower ones,
then nothing for a few seconds and then one final shot.
said she heard about 20 gunshots of
two different sounds, but she could not see what was happening.
an employee of an
in
heard a screeching sound like
squealing tires outside the office window. He saw a man running in front of the church with what
appeared to be a gun in his right hand. He also saw officers with guns drawn and heard shooting. He
then got on a two-way radio and told other school officials to put the school on lockdown.
looked out the window and saw the running man now lying on the ground and a police
officer run to the man and give him first-aid chest compressions. He did not see the shooting, but he
did hear bullets strike the church.
another employee of the academy, walked out into a hallway and saw
lying on the
ground. He said
told him he heard gunshots, and
then ran to his classroom and told the
students to get on the floor.
looked out the window and saw a mans body on the ground and
police officers taking cover behind a tree. He said those officers then ran to the man on the ground
and tried to help resuscitate him.
was driving to her childrens daycare when she saw a police car behind another vehicle that
had crashed. She began to video the incident with her cellphone as a man ran from officers. Soon after
the man was out of sight she heard several gunshots.
said he witnessed some of the incident and that he recorded the end of the incident with his
cellphone. He gave an interview to a local reporter, but would not talk with the TBI.
Legal Analysis and Conclusion of Law
Criminal liability is established only if all the elements of an offense outlined by statute are proven
beyond a reasonable doubt and that the offense is committed without legal justification. Use of deadly
force by a law enforcement officer is justified in circumstances as addressed in TCA 39-11-620:
An officer may use deadly force in order to effect an arrest if all other reasonable means of
apprehension have been exhausted or are unavailable, and where feasible, has given notice of the
officers identity as such and given a warning that deadly force may be used unless resistance or
flight ceases, and has probable cause to believe the individual to be arrested has committed a felony
involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious bodily injury or probable cause to believe
that the individual to be arrested poses a threat of serious bodily injury, either to the officer or to
others unless immediately apprehended.
These justifications are affirmative defenses which means an officer accused of a crime for using
deadly force does not need to prove that he or she was justified in using such force, but rather the
prosecution would have to prove the deadly force was not justified. Thus, the question before me is
this: Would a jury find beyond a reasonable doubt, unanimously, that Officer
or Officer
acted without lawful justification? The answer is no.
I believe a jury would find that Officer
and Officer
had lawful justification to fire their
weapons at Bratcher in self-defense, in the defense of others and in order to affect the arrest. Bratcher
had already shown his disregard for the safety of others by recklessly making a U-turn at a crowded
intersection and crashing into two other vehicles. He ran from his vehicle carrying a loaded .40-cal.
pistol with an extended magazine clip. Bratcher opened fire on Deputy
and then on Officer
endangering their lives as well as the lives of numerous motorists and their passengers driving
on South Parkway. There also were two churches in the immediate vicinity, including one in which
teachers and school children had to get down on the floor when they heard gunfire. Both officers were
clearly in uniform, yet Bratcher fired numerous rounds at them while trying to avoid arrest.
Officer
said he saw Bratcher first shooting at Deputy
and that he shouted, Police. Stop.
Drop the weapon. Officer
fired two or three shots at Bratcher and then dove to the ground
when Bratcher pointed his gun at him and opened fire with what sounded to Officer
like a
machine gun. Bratcher was a convicted felon with illegal possession of a firearm who knew he was
going back to prison if apprehended.
Near the end of the running gun battle with officers, in which Bratcher endangered numerous lives,
he hid behind parked cars and continued firing. Officer
again told onlookers to get back inside
the church for their safety, and said he came to a point where I had to end it and aim for his head.
That was the only thing visible. The fatal shot struck Bratcher in the back of the head and was fired
from a distance Officer
estimated to be 20 to 25 yards.
Our U.S. Supreme Court has observed that the calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance
for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments in circumstances
that are tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving about the amount of force that is necessary in a
particular situation. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989.) The court further stated that the
reasonableness of force by an officer must be judged from the perspective of the officer at the scene,
rather than judged with the benefit of hindsight.
Weighing the totality of circumstances of Jan. 27, 2016, no criminal charges will be filed and no
indictments will be sought against Officer
or Officer
in the death of Jonathon Bratcher.
Sincerely,
Amy P. Weirich
Shelby County District Attorney General