Professional Documents
Culture Documents
womens
rights
etc.
And
what
comes
next?
Will
this
administration
actually
have
a
policy
to
address
the
concerns
of
the
country?
And,
no,
China
isnt
going
to
agree
to
a
40%
tariff
and
no,
Mexico
isnt
going
to
fund
a
wall.
4. Self-interest
and
self-loathing
Let
me
acknowledge
that
this
election
appears
to
have
been
won
fair
and
square
within
the
demands
of
the
current
Electoral
college
system.
How
did
the
new
President
fare
among
various
groups?
42%
of
women
voters
-
53%
of
Caucasian
women
voters,
6%
of
African
American
women,
32%
of
Latina
women
72%
among
Caucasian
males
without
a
college
degree,
62%
among
Caucasian
females
without
a
college
degree
13%
of
African
American
men
A
possible
conclusion
to
be
drawn
is
that
for
a
significant
number
of
women
especially,
Trumps
public
remarks
and
being
accused
of
sexual
assault
didnt
have
an
impact
on
how
they
voted.
And
that
not
having
a
college
education
made
a
voter
more
likely
to
vote
for
the
inherited
millionaire
with
a
record
of
alleged
discrimination
going
back
decades.
I
dont
know
the
answer
to
this
question
but
are
there
are
significant
numbers
of
people
who
have
voted
against
their
own
self
interest?
Whether
thats
a
loss
in
government
benefits,
healthcare
coverage
or
even
less
access
to
infrastructure
remains
to
be
seen
but
it
would
seem
like
theres
a
possibility
that
many
people
have
cut
off
their
noses
to
spite
their
faces.
5. The
(Midwestern)
red
army
I
used
to
live
in
Chicago
for
many
years
and
I
always
knew
it
was
something
of
an
anomaly
in
the
Midwest,
being
large,
cosmopolitan
and
relatively
progressive
and
friendly
to
labor
interests.
The
current
voting
map
essentially
shows
that
its
Chicago
vs.
the
Red
army
not
that
we
need
to
stretch
too
much
to
make
Russian
metaphors
now.
6. Tribalism,
exclusionism
and
the
need
to
follow
Is
politics
a
zero
sum
game?
Yes,
there
are
winners
and
losers
in
every
election.
And
clearly,
in
the
long
run,
there
are
segments
of
people
who
are
favored
more
by
the
outcomes
than
others.
Especially
in
the
American
electoral
system,
which
is
more
or
less
a
winner
takes
all
setup
(especially
for
example
at
each
states
level
for
the
electoral
college
votes),
there
is
a
winner
and
there
is
a
clearly
delineated
loser.
The
divide
possibly
wouldnt
be
quite
as
stark
in
a
proportional
representation
system,
but
thats
a
theoretical
discussion
for
now.
The
system
therefore
encourages
group
identity
and
groupthink
you
are
either
part
of
the
happy
winning
group,
a
sore
but
still
supported
part
of
the
losing
group,
or
a
virtually
alone
third
party.
Given
that,
its
almost
surprising
that
the
third-party
candidates
accounted
for
about
5%
of
the
national
popular
vote.
It
always
seemed
to
me
that
Democrats
who
expected
Republicans
to
not
vote
for
their
candidate
were
engaging
in
meaningless
wishful
thinking
and
for
me,
this
Add
this
to
the
proven
human
inability
to
understand
and
make
good
long
term
choices
and
what
we
have
is
a
toxic
cocktail
of
serious
challenges
and
a
system
that
completely
dis-incentivizes
people
to
address
these,
and
in
fact
rewards
them
for
making
the
wrong
decision
but
which
appears
better
in
the
extremely
short-term.
It
has
also
conclusively
now
been
shown
that
predicting
human
behavior
is
a
hazardous
task,
and
that
algorithms
and
data
clearly
reflect
the
human
hand
that
designed
these.
Whither
big
data
in
a
post-factual
world?
Never
let
a
crisis
go
to
waste
And
make
no
bones
about
it,
this
is
a
crisis.
Now
is
the
time
more
than
ever
to
be
clear
on
what
is
important,
defend
it
tooth
and
nail
and
demonstrate
with
your
behaviors
and
attitude
that
you
will
do
what
it
takes
to
advance
the
cause
of
peace,
social
equity
and
justice,
progress
on
healthcare
and
education
and
stewardship
of
the
only
planet
that
we
will
ever
know.