Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Maria Hernandez-Reif PhD, Tiany Field PhD,
Josh Krasnegor BA, Z. Hossain,
Hillary Theakston BA, I. Burman LMT
Research Institute, University of Miami School of
Medicine and Nova Southeastern University, Florida,
USA
Correspondence to: Tiany Field, Touch Research
Institutes, Nova Southeastern University, 3301
College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA.
Tel.: 1 954 262 6919; Fax: 1 954 262 3886
Received: March 1999
Revised: April 1999
Accepted: May 1999
...........................................
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (2000)
4(1), 31^38
# 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd
31
Hernandez-Reif et al.
aggressive hypertensives, for
example, show elevated plasma
epinephrine (Netter & Neuhauser
1991). In genetically inbred
hypertensive rats, norepinephrine
and dopamine uptake levels were
enhanced compared to controls
(Chivet et al. 1984, Hendley & Fan
1992). Thus, the reduction of
catecholamines (i.e. norepinephrine,
epinephrine and dopamine) and
cortisol (stress hormone) should be
an important goal in the treatment
of hypertension. Recognizing that
blood pressure is determined by
multiple factors (catecholamine and
cortisol levels, individual,
interpersonal and environmental
causes), complementary approaches
may be needed to evaluate,
prevent and treat hypertension
(Sidorenko).
Non-drug treatments, if eective,
can be less expensive and can
avoid potential side-eects
(Khramelashvili 1986) such as those
associated with anti-hypertension
drugs (Aagaard 1981). Some
eective non-drug preventive
measures and treatments include
exercise and reduction of body
weight and dietary salt. Other
non-drug treatments, such as
psychological methods, including
relaxation therapy and biofeedback
have yielded mixed ndings
(Darison et al. 1991, McGrady et al.
1991, Jacob et al. 1992). For
example, some studies have
suggested that biofeedback and
relaxation therapy were more
eective than drug treatment (e.g.
hydrochlorothiazide) for reducing
stress, anxiety and blood pressure
(Sothers & Anker 1989, Blanchard
1990). Other studies have revealed
that relaxation therapy is only
eective for highly motivated
patients with favorable family and
socioeconomic support (Sothers &
Ankers 1989, Blanchard 1990).
Massage therapy has been shown
to eectively reduce anxiety and
depression and lower stress
Method
Participants
Thirty adults (21 women and 9 men)
with at least a 6 month long medical
diagnosis of hypertension
participated in this study (M age
51.6 years, S.D. 8.8 years). Data
for ve additional subjects (two
from the massage therapy group)
were rejected due to non compliance
with the treatment protocol. The
participants were from middle
socioeconomic status (M2.3 on the
Hollingshead index), and the
ethnicity of the sample was
distributed 60% Caucasian, 27%
Hispanic and 13% African
American. The criterion for
inclusion in the study was a medical
diagnosis of high blood pressure for
at least 6 months duration.
Individuals were excluded from
participating if they had other
medical conditions (e.g. diabetes or
psychiatric disorders (e.g. bipolar).
Participants reported that their high
blood pressure was controlled and
that they were highly compliant with
their medication intake: 2 and ttests revealed no dierences between
the groups on age, race, and
medication type (e.g. beta-blocker vs
calcium channel blocker) (Table 1).
Control
52
50
10
4
1
8
4
3
Sex
Male
Female
6
9
8
7
Medication type
Beta blocker
Calcium channel blocker
Anticoagulant
ACE inhibitor
5
6
3
1
6
5
2
2
Variable
Age
Race
Caucasian
Hispanics
African Americans
x2
t-test
0.80
0.43
1.22
0.54
0.54
0.715
32
0.46
0.87
Massage therapy
Procedures
As participants entered the study,
they were randomly assigned to a
massage therapy (n15) or
progressive muscle relaxation
(n15) group and were asked to
continue their drug and nutritional
regimen. Random assignment was
determined by the experimenter who
drew a number out of a box
corresponding to massage (1) or
relaxation (2). Participants were
informed that the therapies were
expected to promote relaxation and
reduce stress and therefore talking
was discouraged during sessions.
Participants who were assigned to
the progressive muscle relaxation
group were informed that they
would receive complementary
massage therapy at the end of the
study.
Arms
Back
Massage therapy
Participants assigned to this group
received 30 min therapy sessions
twice a week for ve consecutive
weeks during the afternoon or early
evening. The massages were
conducted by dierent massage
therapists assigned on a rotating
basis to distribute their abilities
across the subject pool and to
prevent the potential confound of
attachment to a particular therapist.
The massage began with the subject
in the supine position and
progressed in the following
sequence:
Head/neck
(a) Holding the neck with both
hands, gentle pressing and
stretching to lengthen the
spine.
(b) With the at of the hand,
stroking one side and then the
other side of the neck from head
to shoulder.
(c) Using the ngertips, small
circular stroking to the jaw and
cheekbone area.
Progressive muscle
relaxation
Participants assigned to this group
performed 30 min sessions
consisting of progressive muscle
relaxation exercises twice a week for
ve consecutive weeks. Participants
were instructed by dierent
therapists and researchers on how to
perform the sessions and to only
perform the sessions on their
assigned days (e.g. every Tuesday
and Friday afternoon or early
evening) to ensure that frequency
and session lengths were comparable
to the time schedule of the massage
therapy group.
The relaxation session began with
the subject in the supine position.
The participant was instructed to
breathe deeply for several minutes
33
Hernandez-Reif et al.
and relax placing the hands
alongside the body. Then the
participant was asked to follow the
verbal instructions consisting of
tightening and relaxing dierent
muscles of the body in a feet to head
progression similar to that
progression used in massage
therapy. The muscle groups that
were exercised were the (1) feet,
(2) calves, (3) thighs, (4) hands,
(5) arms, (6) back and (7) face.
Assessments
Pre/post treatment
assessments (immediate
eects)
These assessments were made before
and after the sessions on the rst
and last days of the 5 week study
during our oce hours.
State anxiety inventory (STAI)
This is a 20 item inventory on how
the subject feels at the moment.
Characteristic items include `I feel
nervous', `I feel anxious', `I am
worried'. The STAI scores increase
in response to stress. Research has
demonstrated that the STAI has
adequate concurrent validity and
adequate internal consistency,
r0.83, (Spielberger 1970, 1972).
Salivary samples
These were collected and assayed for
cortisol levels as a measure of stress.
The samples were obtained at the
beginning of the massage therapy or
progressive muscle relaxation
session and 20 min after the end of
the session on the rst and last days
of the study. Due to the 20 min
lagtime in cortisol changes, saliva
samples always reect responses to
stimulation occurring 20 min prior
to sampling (O'Connors & Corrigan
1987). Subjects were asked to place
a cotton dental swab dipped in
sugar-free lemonade crystals along
34
Massage therapy
frozen and later assayed by highpressure liquid chromatography
with the elcetrochemical detection
(HPLC-ECD) technique for cortisol
and catecholamines
(norepinephrine, epinephrine and
dopamine). Briey, catecholamines
are extracted from a 5 ml aliquot of
urine using a Biorex 70 column. The
extract is injected onto a reverse
phase C18, 5 u column.
Catecholamines are identied by
their characteristic elution patterns
and quantied by using the arearatio method with an internal
standard, on a preprogrammed
computerized data module.
Decreased cortisol and
catecholamine levels were expected
for the massage therapy group by
the end of the 5 week sessions based
on earlier massage therapy studies
(Field 1992, 1996)
Results
Repeated measures multivariate
analyses of variance (MANOVAs),
Saliva
A group by days by session
interaction eect, F (1,23) 5.51,
P50.05, revealed a reduction in
cortisol only for the massage
therapy group after the rst and last
massage session on the rst and last
days of the study (Table 2).
Blood pressure
No signicant interaction eects
were obtained for systolic blood
pressure. The ANOVA on diastolic
blood pressure, however, revealed a
group by session interaction eect
for sitting, F (1,20) 5.63, P50.05
and a group by session by day
interaction eect for reclining blood
pressure, F (1,20) 3.61, P50.05.
Subsequent t-tests showed for the
massage therapy group a decline
(1) in sitting diastolic blood pressure
after the rst and last day's massage
and (2) in reclining blood pressure
from the rst to the last day pretreatment (Table 2).
Table 2 Means (and standard deviations in parantheses) for massage group and relaxation groups for pre/post session and rst last days measures
Massage group
Relaxation group
First day
Variables
Short term measures
STAI (anxiety)
Saliva cortisol
Blood pressure
Systolic
reclining
sitting
Diastolic
reclining
sitting
Long-term measures
Depression (CES-D)
SCL-90R
Depression
Anxiety
Hostility
Last day
First day
Last day
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
36.2 (11.0)a
1.6 (0.6)a
26.4 (7.5)b4
1.2 (0.5)b1
32.3 (11.6)a
1.9 (1.1)a
25.3 (8.9)b4
1.2 (0.6)b2
39.7 (8.5)a
1.2 (0.6)b
28.7 (9.3)b
1.2 (0.5)b
34.7 (5.9)a
1.1 (.3)b
26.6 (3.1)b4
1.4 (.5)b
135 (15)a
140 (19)a
134 (17)a
136 (21)a
133 (16)a
142 (19)a
132 (14)a
133 (19)b1
133 (12)a
136 (15)a
132 (13)a
34 (11)a
133 (14)a
136 (18)a
132 (18)a
138 (20)a
83 (9)a
89 (8)a
First day
17.8 (11.5)a
81 (9)a
82 (9)b2
78 (9)b1
85 (6)a
Last day
8.3 (7.0)b2
81 (7)a
81 (7)b1
82 (8)a
88 (7)a
First day
17.1 (13.5)a
85 (9)a
88 (6)a
84 (11)a
86 (14)a
Last day
12.8 (5.8)c1
85 (11)a
88 (12)a
16.4 (10.2)a
5.2 (4.5)a
3.5 (2.9)a
5.0 (6.8)b2
1.3 (1.1)b2
1.2 (0.8)b1
15.1 (12.0)a
5.4 (5.2)a
3.8 (4.7)a
11.0 (5.4)a
4.0 (1.4)a
3.2 (1.1)a
Dierent letter subscript denotes statistically dierent means within groups for pre/post measures (short-term) or rst/last day measures (longterm). A superscript denoted on a pre measure indicates signicantly dierent means for rst day pre versus last day pre value. 1P 0.05, 2P 0.01,
3
P 0.005, 4P 0.001.
35
Hernandez-Reif et al.
Long-term eects rst^last day
measures
The MANOVA on the longer-term
measures (CES-D, SCL-90-R)
revealed a group by days interaction
eect, E (4,20) 4.52, P50.05.
CES-D
The ANOVA on the depression
score yielded a signicant eect of
days, F (1,28) 8.13, P50.01,
suggesting that depression scores
were lower for both the massage
therapy and relaxation group by
the end of the study. However, an
analysis of the change score
(i.e. Last day's CES-D score minus
baseline CES-D) revealed that
depression scores were signicantly
lower for participants receiving
massage therapy than for those
conducting relaxation sessions
t(22) 2.82, P50.01 (Table 2).
SCL-90-R
A signicant group by days
interaction eect, F (3,21) 3.90,
P50.05, and subsequent t-tests
revealed a reduction in depression,
t (14) 4.26, P50.01, anxiety,
t (14) 3.26, P 5 0.01, and
hostility, t (14) 2.31, P50.05, only
for the massage therapy group
(Table 2).
Urinary catecholamines and cortisol
Scatterplots revealed that the data
were not normally distributed. Thus,
non-parametric methods were
applied. Wilcoxon Matched Pairs
Signed Ranks Tests revealed a
decrease in urinary cortisol (Z 2.3,
P50.05) for the massage therapy
group (Table 3).
Discussion
For the massage therapy group,
sitting diastolic and systolic blood
pressure decreased after the rst and
last sessions and reclining diastolic
blood pressure declined from the
rst to the last day of the 5 week
Table 3 Means for massage and relaxation groups.Wilcoxon Sign RankTest and p-values for
urinary cortisol and catecholamine
Massage
Relaxation
Measure
First/Last
z=
p5
First/Last
z=
p5
Cortisol
Norepinephrine
Epinephrine
Dopamine
125/109
37/47
7/7
294/284
3.56
1.96
0.39
1.00
0.05
NS
NS
NS
108/102
34/58
8/7
317/322
1.35
0.67
1.21
0.40
NS
NS
NS
NS
36
Massage therapy
individuals with hypertension
symptoms might require longer or
more frequent treatments. Or
perhaps the participants were not
highly stressed as initial levels were
only slightly above normal. Future
research might examine massage
therapy eects for individuals with
hypertension who are highly
stressed. Perhaps daily or weekly
blood pressure readings, longer-term
monitoring of stress hormone
production and stress symptoms
might help our understanding of the
potential eects of massage therapy
as a complementary treatment for
hypertension. Longer-term followup might also help determine
whether the results reected shortterm eects or whether the results
would have persisted beyond the
treatment sessions. If massage
therapy can eectively reduce
symptoms associated with
hypertension, then it might
reduce life-threatening
complications, such as the risk of
stroke or heart attack.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the men and women
who participated in this study and the
therapists who provided the massage
therapy. This research was supported by
an NIMH Research Scientist Award
(#MH00331) and Johnson and
Johnson support funds to Tiany
Field.
REFERENCES
Aagaard G 1987 A nondrug approach to the
treatment of hypertension. In: Drayer J,
Lowenthal D, Weber M (Eds) Drug
Therapy in Hypertension, New York,
Marcel Dekker, 2744
Blanchard E 1990 Biofeedback treatments of
essential hypertension. Biofeedback &
Self-Regulation 15: 209228
Chiu P, Rajakumar G, Chiu S, Kwan CY,
Mishra RK 1984 Dierential changes in
central serotonin and dopamine receptors
in spontaneous hypertensive rats.
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharm & Biol
Psych 8: 665668
hypertension. Hypertension:
Psychophysiological, Biobehavioral
and Epidemiological Aspects. Wash,
DC: US Depart of Health and Human
Services (NIH Pub No. #86-2704),
119138
McCubbin JA 1989 Diminished opiod
inhibition of blood pressure and pituitary
function in hypertension development.
In: McCubbin JA, Kaufmann PG,
Nemero CB (Eds) Stress, neuropeptides,
and systemic disease. New York: Plenum
Press, 113122
McGrady A, Nadsady PA, SchumannBrzezinski C 1991 Sustained eects of
biofeedback-assisted relaxation therapy
in essential hypertension. Biofeedback &
Self-Regulation 16: 399411
Morse DR, Martin J, Moshonov J 1992 Stress
induced sudden cardiac death: can it be
prevented? Stress Med 8: 3546
Netter P, Neuhauser MS 1991 Types of
aggressiveness and catecholamine
response in essential hypertensives and
healthy controls. J Psychosom Res
35: 409419
O'Connor P, Corrigan D 1987 Inuence of
short-term cycling on salivary cortisol
levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19:
224228
Piccirillo G, Elvira S, Viola E et al. 1998
Autonomic modulation of heart rate and
blood pressure in hypertensive subjects
with symptoms of anxiety. Clinical Sc
95: 4352
Radlo L 1977 The CES-D scale: A selfreport depression scale for research in the
general population. Applied Psychol
Measure 1: 385401
Radlo L 1991 The use of the Center for
Epidemiological Studies Depression
Scale in adolescents and young adults.
J Youth Adolsec 20: 149165
Radlo L, Locke BZ 1978 The Community
Mental Health Assessment Survey and
the CES-D Scale. In: Weissman M,
Myers J, Ross C (Eds), Community
Surveys. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers
University Press
Scadi F, Field T, Wheeden A et al. 1996
Cocaine-exposed preterm neonates show
behavioral and hormonal dierences. Ped
97: 851855.
Sidorenko G, Pavlova A, Ageyenkova E,
Antonovich M, Nechesova T 1986
Hypertension: Psychophysiological,
Biobehavioral and Epidemiological
Aspects. Wash, DC: US Depart of
Health and Human Services (NIH
Pub.No. 86-2704), 139150
Sothers K, Anchor KN 1989 Prevention and
treatment of essential hypertension with
meditation-relaxation methods. MedPsychotherapy Intl J 2: 137156
37
Hernandez-Reif et al.
38