Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We also urge the Commission to explore fully all credible accounts of Irans complicity in war crimes in
Aleppo. Throughout the course of the Syrian crisis, Iranian-backed militias have played a central role in
enforcing Syrias sieges and overseeing local forced surrender negotiations. Iranian security and
intelligence services have reportedly advised and assisted the Syrian military, including through the
provision of expeditionary training via the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Ground Forces. It is
estimated that Iran oversees some 70,000 paramilitary troops in Syria, many of whom have been involved
in atrocities against civilians. Yet nowhere has Iranian intervention been more egregious than in eastern
Aleppo, where Iran deliberately obstructed a 13 December 2016 ceasefire, which would have permitted
thousands of innocent civilians to be safely evacuated from the besieged city. Reports from civilians on
the ground reveal that Iranian militias forcefully prevented civilians from leaving the besieged districts of
eastern Aleppo, setting off a violent wave of shelling and airstrikes that caused more civilian deaths. Such
crimes must be investigated thoroughly by the Commission of Inquirys team, to ensure that those
responsible are held to account.
Your Excellency, as organizations active in Aleppo, we would be honored to work with your team to
provide you with evidence, testimonials, and any other relevant information to assist your investigations
and help in the identification of suspected perpetrators. We would welcome a meeting with your team
and hope that your inquiry will bring us one step closer to justice and accountability.
Sincerely,
Syrian Civil Defence (White Helmets)
Syrian Network for Human Rights
Independent Doctors Association
Violations Documentation Center
Since its intervention in Syria in September 2015, the Russian Federation has perpetrated at least 420 attacks
on civilians in Aleppo which may constitute war crimes. This Annex documents 304 of the most egregious
violations, primarilythough not exclusivelytaking place between July and December 2016. The attacks
below resulted in 1,207 civilian deaths, including 380 children. No less than one third of all attacks resulted in
child casualties.
Evidence also suggests that Russian airstrikes disproportionately affect Syrias vital health facilities. Airstrikes
on medical facilities have surged since Russia intervened in the Syrian conflict. Since October 2015, attacks on
medical facilities across Syria have increased from one attack every four days to a total of one attack on a
medical facility every two days. Over the past two weeks, attacks on medical facilities have increased to a rate
of one every nine hours. The impact on eastern Aleppo has been catastrophic. Today, there is a not a single
medical facility or hospital to serve the areas population of residents.
Listed below are violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law, in which our
organizations have determined that there was a high likelihood of Russian responsibility. These
determinations have been made on the basis of witness testimony and corroborating evidence, which includes
video footage identifying the aircraft responsible for attacks, audio intercepted from aircraft cockpits,
spotters identification of aircraft, height at which aircraft flew, the formation in which attacking aircraft flew,
attack tactics of aircraft, the time of day in which the attacks took place, and the types of munitions used.
The incidents identified in this report represent just a fraction of the many indiscriminate acts of violence
perpetrated against Syrian civilians by either the Syrian regime or Russia, where Russia could not be identified
as the perpetrator with a high degree of certainty. The total number of atrocities for which Russia is
responsible is therefore likely to be considerably higher than the incidents documented here stipulate.
I: Complicity in Syrian War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
Article VII of the Nuremberg Principles states: "Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war
crime, or a crime against humanityis a crime under international law."
Since Russias direct intervention in Syria in September 2015, there have been at least 5,779 documented
civilian deaths in Aleppo. In addition to the incidents listed below, there are countless similar violations of
international humanitarian law for which reasonable proof indicates that either Russia or Syria was
responsible.
Notably, the vast majority of documented incidents were carried out as airstrikes. Since July 2016, airstrikes
have accounted for two-thirds (or a total of 66 percent) of civilian deaths in Aleppo, according to the
Violations Documentation Centre. As the only parties who fly planes over Aleppo, Russia and the Assad
regime are therefore the only parties who could feasibly be responsible for these attacks. According to the
Syrian Network for Human Rights, the Syrian regime carried out 214 airstrikes between 19 September and 19
October. Russia carried out more than four times that number, for a total of 982.1 Russia is therefore not
merely nominally involved in the Syrian conflictit is in fact at the forefront of it.
Syria Network for Human Rights, Detailed Account of One Month of Syrian-Russian Attacks on the Neighborhoods of
Eastern Aleppo, 20 October 2016
Given the symbiotic relationship between the Russian and Syrian military campaignsincluding their shared
objectives and joint military planningit is often difficult for our monitors on the ground to identify specific
perpetrators for each attack. Rather than shielding one partner from the crimes of the other, however, under
the aforementioned Article VII of the Nuremberg Principles, Syria and Russia are not only responsible for every
war crime each has committed, but also for any crimes the other committed. It is as much of a violation of
international humanitarian law to commit a war crime as it is to be complicit in war crimes committed by
another.
By Russias continued logistical, military, and intelligence support to the military operations of the Syrian
regime, not least of which is the siege of Aleppo endangering the lives of more than 300,000 civilians, Russia is
an accomplice to and is accountable for all crimes committed by the Syrian regime in Aleppo.
II: Attacks on Humanitarian Objects and Personnel
International humanitarian law prohibits parties to conflict from engaging in attacks on humanitarian convoys.
This includes: Common Article 3 which prohibits violence against civilians, including murder; IV GC Article 23
which requires the free passage of medical and food essentials; GC AP I Article 51 which requires the
protection of civilians; GC AP I Article 52 which prohibits attacks on civilian objects; GC AP I Article 54 which
prohibits attacks against objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population; GC AP II Article 13
which requires the protection of civilians; GC AP II Article 14 which prohibits the destruction of civilian
foodstuffs and vital supplies; ICRC Rule 1 which requires distinction between civilians and combatants; ICRC
Rule 7 which prohibits attacks against civilian objects; ICRC Rule 31 which requires protection of humanitarian
relief personnel; ICRC Rule 89 which prohibits murder; Rome Statute Article 8 which prohibits attacks on
civilians and prohibits the targeting of humanitarian relief personnel; and the 1923 Hague Rules on Aerial
Warfare, Article 22 which prohibits aerial bombardment of non-military objectives.
Documented incidents in which there is a high likelihood of Russian responsibility:
1. Urum Al-Kubra, Aleppo [3]
Date: 19 September 2016
Casualties: At least 12 aid workers and civilians killed, including the director of the Syrian Arab Red
Crescent; 21 wounded
Considerations: The material aid that was set to reach 78,000 people was destroyed; the convoy was
clearly marked with the distinctive emblem; the convoys route had been provided to Russia and the
Syrian regime; the attack lasted more than 3 hours.
III. Attacks on Civilians, including children
International humanitarian law and international human rights law prohibit parties from intentionally or
indiscriminately attacking civilians, especially children. This includes: Common Article 3 which prohibits of
violence against civilians, including murder; IV GC Article 33 which prohibits collective punishment of civilians;
GC AP I Article 51 which requires the protection of civilians; GC AP I Article 52 which prohibits attacks on
civilian objects; GC AP I Article 57 which requires that precautions are taken to protect the civilian population
from attacks; GC AP II Article 13 which requires protection of civilians; ICRC Rule 1 which requires distinction
between civilians and combatants; ICRC Rule 7 which prohibits attacks against civilian objects; ICRC Rule 11
which prohibits indiscriminate attacks; ICRC Rule 13 which prohibits indiscriminate area bombardment; ICRC
Rule 14 which mandates proportionality in attacks; ICRC Rule 89 which prohibits murder; Rome Statute
Article 8 which prohibits attacks against civilians and civilian objects; 1923 Hague Rules on Aerial Warfare,
Article 24 which mandates that aerial bombardment be directed against a military target, i.e., non-civilian.
82
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Additional violations: Common Article 3 prohibits violence, including murder, of civilians; IV GC Article 20
requires protection of medical personnel; GC AP I Article 21 requires the protection of medical vehicles;
GC AP I Article 51 requires the protection of civilians; GC AP I Article 71 requires the protection of
personnel participating in relief actions; GC AP I Article 79 requires protection for journalists; GC AP II
Article 9 requires protection of medical personnel; ICRC Rule 25 requires the protection of medical
personnel; ICRC Rule 89 prohibits murder.
18. Jameat Rif al-Muhandisin medical system [2]
Date: 18 July 2016
Location: Rif al-Muhandisin, Aleppo Suburbs
Consequences: Partial destruction of the building and its fence; 4 ambulances destroyed, two rendered
out of commission.
Additional violations: GC AP I Article 21 requires the protection of medical vehicles.
19. Al-Daqaq Surgical Hospital [2]
Date: 24 July 2016
Location: Al-Shaar neighborhood, Aleppo
Consequences: Building mildly damaged
20. Fatima al-Zahraa Makeshift Hospital [2]
Date: 24 July 2016
Location: Al-Shaar neighborhood, Aleppo
Consequences: Building moderately damaged
21. Blood Bank Building [2]
Date: 24 July 2016
Location: Al-Shaar neighborhood, Aleppo
Consequences: Damage to the laboratory and analysis machines
22. Al-Atareb Hospital [2]
Date: 24 July 2016
Location: Al-Atareb, Aleppo
Consequences: Operation room and equipment moderately damaged
23. Makeshift Hospital [8]
Date: 30 July 2016
Location: Anadan, Aleppo
Consequences: Hospital rendered out of commission; ambulance moderately damaged.
Additional violations: GC AP I Article 21 requires the protection of medical vehicles.
24. Al-Huda Makeshift Hospital [2]
Date: 31 July 2016
Location: Hawwar town, Aleppo suburbs [double check cant find Hawwar/Kafr Hawr is in Damascus]
Consequences: Hospital walls partially destroyed; equipment heavily damaged. Hospital rendered
inoperative.
25. Al-Rih al-Mursalat [2]
Date: 16 August 2016
Location: Darat Izza, Aleppo
Consequences: Two ambulances burnt and rendered out of commission.
Additional violations: GC AP I Article 21 requires the protection of medical vehicles.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Documented attacks against civilian infrastructure in which there is a high likelihood of Russian
responsibility:
1.
2.
3.
Documented attacks against bakeries & markets in which there is a high likelihood of Russian responsibility:
Additional violations: GC AP I Article 54 prohibits starvation of civilians as a tactic of warfare, and prohibits the
destruction of civilian foodstuffs; GC AP II Article 14 prohibits the destruction of civilian foodstuffs; Rome
Statute Article 8 prohibits depriving the civilian population of objects indispensable to their survival.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Documented incidents against mosques in which there is a high likelihood of Russian responsibility:
Additional violations: GC AP I Article 53 requires the protection of cultural objects and places of worship.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Source Key:
[1] Syria Network for Human Rights, Not less than 27 medical centers shelled by Russian forces since its intervention:
The Grozny Holocaust in Aleppo, 19 February 2016
Methodology: Interviews with eyewitnesses, photo and video analysis and verification.
[2] Syria Network for Human Rights, No less than 59 medical centers have been targeted by Russian Forces since its
intervention in Syria, 10 September 2016
Methodology: Interviews with eyewitnesses and survivors, daily monitoring and documentation efforts, and photo
and video analysis and verification.
[3] Syria Network for Human Rights, Multiple Evidences Indicating that Russian and Syrian Forces Deliberately Targeted
the U.N. Aid Convoy in Aleppo, 24 September 2016
Methodology: Site visits, photo and video documentation, analysis of missile fragments, and eyewitness interviews.
[4] Syria Network for Human Rights, Detailed account of most notable violations of human rights by Russian Forces in
one year, 30 September 2016
Methodology: Interviews with eyewitnesses and survivors, daily monitoring and documentation efforts, photo and
video analysis and verification, and analysis of missile fragments.
[5] Syria Network for Human Rights, Detailed account of the Russian-Syrian attacks on the neighborhoods of Eastern
Aleppo after 25 days of the second cessation of hostilities statement, 16 October 2016
Methodology: Interviews with eyewitnesses and survivors, daily monitoring and documentation efforts, and photo
and video analysis and verification.
[6] Syria Network for Human Rights, Detailed account of one month of Syrian-Russian attacks on the neighborhoods of
Eastern Aleppo, 20 October 2016
Methodology: Interviews with eyewitnesses and survivors, daily monitoring and documentation efforts, and photo
and video analysis and verification.
[7] Independent Doctors Association, IDA
Methodology: Interviews with medical staff on site, as well as eyewitnesses who saw and heard Russian planes
carrying out each attack.
[8] Syria Network for Human Rights, Most notable violations that were perpetrated by Russian forces in Aleppo
governorate from the beginning of July 2016 until the end of November 2016
Methodology: Interviews with eyewitnesses and survivors, daily monitoring and documentation efforts, and photo
and video analysis and verification.
[9] White Helmets Report, 6 December 2016
Methodology: Witness testimony; on-the-ground spotters identification of aircraft; video footage; audio intercepted
from aircraft cockpits; the types of munitions used; time of attack; and height, formation and attack tactics of aircraft.