Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264828408
CITATIONS
READS
365
1 author:
Paolo Paron
UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
31 PUBLICATIONS 116 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Paolo Paron on 19 August 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
718
societies and politicians. That goal can be achieved by permanent environmental education programs realized both at
the international and regional level.
Bibliography
Beer, T., 2001. Air quality as a meteorological hazard. Natural
Hazards, 23, 157169.
Disasters in numbers, 2011. Website of the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/
disaster-statistics/pdf/2005-disaster-in-numbers.pdf. Accessed
May 31, 2012.
Geophysical Hazard, 2010. Website: Geography in the news,
Glossary. Royal Geographical Society. http://www.geography
inthenews.org/glossary/?word=Geophysical hazard. Accessed
January 28, 2010.
Glacier Hazards, 2010. Glacier hazards website and database.
Department of Geography, University of Zurich. http://www.
glacierhazards.ch/. Accessed January 28, 2010.
Graniczny, M., and Mizerski, W., 2007. Katastrofy Przyrodnicze
[Natural Catastrophies]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe
PWN [in Polish].
IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. In Core Writing
Team, Pachauri, R. K and Reisinger, A. (eds.), Contribution of
Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
Jacobson, M. Z., 2002. Atmospheric Pollution. History, Science and
Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karst as Geologic Hazard, 2006. Website of Kentucky Geological
Survey, University of Kentucky; Part: Research, Water. http://
www.uky.edu/KGS/water/general/karst/karstgeohazard.htm.
Date of access: Accessed January 28, 2010.
Mannion, A. M., 1997. Global Environmental Change. A Natural and
Cultural Environmental History. Harlow: Addison Wesley
Longman.
Mayhew, S., 1997. A Dictionary of Geography. Oxford/New York:
Oxford University Press.
Middelmann, M. H. (ed.), 2007. Natural hazards in Australia.
Identifying risk analysis requirements. Canberra: Geoscience
Australia.
Natural Hazard, 2010. Website of World Meteorological Organization, Themes, Natural Hazards, http://www.wmo.int/pages/
themes/hazards/index_en.html. Accessed January 28, 2010.
Natural Hazards A National Threat, 2007. U.S. Geological Survey
Fact Sheet. www.usgs.gov/hazards/. Accessed January 28, 2010.
Newton, J., 1997. Federal legislation for disaster mitigation:
a comparative assessment between Canada and the United
States. Natural Hazards, 16, 219241.
Nicholls, N., 2001. Atmospheric and climatic hazards: improved
monitoring and prediction for disaster mitigation. Natural
Hazards, 23, 137155.
Reddy, S. D., 2000. Factors influencing the incorporation of hazard
mitigation during recovery from disaster. Natural Hazards, 22,
185201.
Scheidegger, A. E., 1997. Complexity theory of natural disasters;
boundaries of self-structured domains. Natural Hazards, 16,
103112.
SHIELD Project, 2009. A Scientific Journey to Natural Hazards
and Disasters. http://www.learn-hazards.org/general.php.
Stillwell, H. D., 1992. Natural hazards and disasters in latin
America. Natural Hazards, 6, 131159.
United Nations Population Division, 2008. An Overview of
Urbanization, Internal Migration, Population Distribution and
Development in the World. http://www.un.org/esa/population/
meetings/EGM_PopDist/P01_UNPopDiv.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2010.
White, R., and Etkin, D., 1997. Climate change, extreme events and
the Canadian insurance industry. Natural Hazards, 16, 135163.
Wilhite, D. A., 1996. A methodology for drought preparedness.
Natural Hazards, 13, 229252.
Cross-references
Avalanches
Climate Change
Community Management of Hazards
Disaster
Drought
Earthquake
Fault
Fire and Firestorms
Flood Hazard and Disaster
Floodplain
Fog Hazards
Frequency and Magnitude of Events
Geohazards
Geological/Geophysical Disasters
Glacier Hazards
Global Change and its Implication for Natural Disaster
Hazard
Heat Wave
Human Impact of Hazards
Hurricane (Cyclone, Typhoon)
Hydrometeorological Hazards
Insurance
Karst Hazards
Land Use, Urbanization, and Natural Hazards
Landslide
Mass Media and Natural Disasters
Mass Movement
Megacities and Natural Hazards
Meteorite
Misconceptions about Natural Disasters
Mitigation
Models of Hazards and Disasters
Monitoring and Prediction of Natural Hazards
Natural Hazard
Natural Hazard in Developing Countries
Perception of Natural Hazards and Disasters
Radon Hazards
Remote Sensing of Natural Hazards and Disasters
Risk
Risk Perception and Communication
Sea Level Change
Tsunami
Vulnerability
Synonyms
Disasters; Environmental hazards; Extreme events;
Less economically developed countries; Low-income
countries; Natural disasters; Third World
Introduction
This entry deals mainly with geophysical hazards
(geological, geomorphological, and atmospheric) in
developing countries. A brief mention of the role of
international agencies in LEDC is also given. First of all,
though, some definitions of natural hazards and of
developing countries are required.
Definitions
The word hazard derives from the Arabic az-zhar,
a composed word meaning literally gaming die
(Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 2002). The first
English meaning is a dice game in which the chances
are complicated by arbitrary rules (Concise Oxford
English Dictionary, 2002) and only in its second definition
there is a mention to what is here addressed, that is, risk of
loss or harm (Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 2002).
These definitions highlight how the term hazard is
highly anthropocentric in nature, and could not be differently so. In fact, it describes an interaction between biophysical processes (occurring on planet Earth forever)
acting on a territory where at a specific time there is human
occupancy. Hence, some natural events can cause harm or
loss of human life or to valued goods, and so they are
perceived as hazards. Without the human presence, there
would not be such a perception, as for instance, when
a strong earthquake strikes in an uninhabited area of the
planet or when very extreme events happen on other
planets where humans are not present, for instance, global
atmospheric perturbation on planet Mars with wind
velocity of some hundred kilometers/hour that we do not
define as hazard but simply observe and describe.
The term hazard is also quantitatively defined
within the geophysical community using the formula:
Rs = H E V (here specifically defined for landslide
risk by Varnes, 1984)
where
Rs = specific risk, or the expected degree of loss due
to a particular magnitude of natural phenomenon
within a specified area over a given period of time
H = hazard, or the probability of occurrence of a particular
magnitude of natural phenomenon within a specified
area over a given period of time
E = elements at risk, or the total economic value of
population, properties, artifacts, infrastructures, amenity, etc. within the specified area under consideration
V = vulnerability, or the proportion of elements at risk or
likely to be affected detrimentally by the hazard, that
is, the significance of loss represented either as
a percentage of E or on the scale 0 to 1.
The term natural hazards also relates vastly with the
concept of time as both perceived by humans and as
a natural factor. In relation to the human perception of
time, well explained by Smith (2009) and shown in
Figure 1, humans retain a sort of long-term average
knowledge of natural environmental processes they
719
720
Above average
MEDC Disaster
Long-term average
Below average
TIME
Above average
Below average
Long-term average
TIME
Natural Hazards in Developing Countries, Figure 1 Comparison between MEDC and LEDC thresholds for the onset of Natural
Hazard and Disaster. The thin lined curve in both diagrams indicates a natural process, for example, rainfall, with its frequency and
magnitude in time. The midline stands for the long-term average. (a) In the MEDC thresholds are quite stable through time if not
becoming wider with time. Also they show a quite wide range of tolerance or resilience that defines the resource boundaries.
A natural hazard impacts on society only when the MEDC Upper Damage threshold is surpassed (Modified after Smith and Petley,
2009). (b) In LEDC, on the other hand, all boundaries and thresholds are highly variable in time depending on socioeconomic
instability of these countries. The resource boundaries are in general smaller than the one of MEDC. Furthermore in LEDC, the
thresholds for Upper Damage and Upper Extreme are not very far one from the other, while in MEDC, they are more widely spaced.
AVALANCHES/LANDSLIDES
EARTHQUAKES
OTHERS
WINDSTORMS
VOLCANOS
Natural Hazards in Developing Countries, Figure 2 (a) Location of the LEDC and of some of the main natural hazards in the world. The LEDC regions are: Central and
South America, Africa (excluding South Africa), Asia (Mid, Central, South East, Far, excluding Japan South Korea, Taiwan, and Russia). (b) Disaster type proportion by UN
macro regions 19742003 (From CRED database).
FLOODS
DROUGHTS/FAMINES
722
NATURAL HAZARDS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Occurrence
Monsoonal
Humid tropic
Deserts
Avalanches
X
Epidemics diseases
Coast = erosion
Desertification
Drought
Dust storm
Flash floods
Fog
Glacier surges
Hail
Hurricanes/
typhoons
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Soil erosion
(including gully
erosion)
Storms
Thermokarst
Tornadoes
Tsunamis
Volcanic
Wildfires
X
X
X
X
Slope instability
723
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
724
Natural component
Sphere Project, with the aim of coordinating and improving the professionalism, effectiveness, and accountability
of the aid actions in disaster contexts. The Sphere
Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in
Disaster Response sets out for the first time what
people affected by disasters have a right to expect
from humanitarian assistance. The aim of the Project
is to improve the quality of assistance provided to
people affected by disasters, and to enhance the accountability of the humanitarian system in disaster response
(http://www.sphereproject.org/content/view/27/84/lang,
english/). Sphere standards set a new paradigm in humanitarian emergencies: Despite being a nonmandatory
set of standards, most agencies/organization comply
with them. Sphere standard undergoes also periodical
participatory review.
Conclusions
Despite a great deal of studies concerned with the
explanation and forecast of global atmospheric and
volcanic hazards, addressing also the developing
countries, there is still a desperate need for detailed
identification of natural hazards in developing countries
(especially the more complex, slow developing ones).
Capacity building at academic and professional level
should be supported and strengthened by the international
community. There is a big opportunity here also for
philanthropic donations by wealthy Africans, South
Americans, and Asians who can probably better
select and direct their generous efforts to deserving
compatriots/research centers.
One of the biggest challenges to reduce natural hazard
vulnerability especially in LEDC for policy makers, land
planners, international and local community leaders is
well spelled out by Smith and Pedley (2009, p. 339)
Any improvement in the connectivity between people
and their environment depends on assisting all community
exposed to risk to develop their own hazard-reducing
capabilities and local self-reliance following disasters.
This is not always an easy task because it depends, to some
extent, on external inputs. For example, the construction
of rural roads in landslide-prone terrain is doomed to
failure if no provision is made for the use of appropriate
engineering measures. Once again there is a need for
integrated approaches in which sensitive external
assistance is deployed to help build community
skills for the anticipation of hazards and the mitigation
of their impacts.
Bibliography
Alcantara-Ayala, I., 2002. Geomorphology, natural hazards,
vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing
countries. Geomorphology, 47, 107124.
Alexander, D., 1993. Natural Disasters. London: UCL Press. 632 p.
Brandt, W., 1980. NorthSouth. A Program for Survival.
Cambridge: MIT Press. 304 p.
725
Cross-references
Civil Protection and Crisis Management
Classification of Natural Disasters
Community Management of Hazards
Coping Capacity
Costs (Economic) of Natural Hazards and Disasters
Disaster
Disaster Risk Management
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
Early Warning Systems
Education and Training for Emergency Preparedness
Exposure to Natural Hazards
Geological/Geophysical Disasters
Global Change and its Implications for Natural Disasters
Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster
Reduction
Hazard
Human Impact of Hazards
Humanity as an Agent of Geological Disaster
726
NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY
NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY*
Cathy Scheib
British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK
Definition
Natural radioactivity originates from two primary sources:
cosmic radiation and radioactive elements in the earths crust.
All the elements from polonium (atomic number 84) to uranium (atomic number 92) are radioactive. Radioisotopes of
some lighter elements are also found in nature (e.g., 40K).
Introduction
Many atoms are unstable and will change quite naturally
into atoms of another element accompanied by the emission
of ionizing radiation. Unstable atoms that change through
radioactive decay to form other nuclides are said to be radioactive and are referred to as radionuclides or radioisotopes.
The rate of change or decay of an unstable radionuclide is
indicated by its half-life, which is the period of time during
which half the original number of atoms would have
decayed. The radioactivity of the earth includes three major
categories: primordial radionuclides, which have very long
half-lives, were created in stellar processes before the
earth was formed and are still present in the earths crust;
secondary radionuclides, which are decay products of primordial radionuclides that are themselves radioactive and
will decay to other secondary radionuclides or to stable
isotopes; and cosmogenic radionuclides which are continuously produced by bombardment of stable nuclides by
cosmic rays, primarily in the atmosphere. Natural radionuclides are ubiquitous in the environment and make a major
contribution to background radiation (see Dose Rate).
Cosmic radiation
The atmosphere is continuously exposed to primary cosmic
radiation that originates in outer space. This cosmic radiation
comprises predominantly protons (about 87%) and alphaparticles (about 11%), with a smaller fraction of nuclei and
*British Geological Survey