Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DERIVATIVES MODULE
ue inc
decreas
would
Changes
initia
rate
and
income.
spot
represent the total time value of the conr, these amounts will affect current
compreh
not
Howeve
operati
self a
example
total values.
ed sale of inventory, changes in the
recast
intrin
sic value would not be recognized curA put option has intrinsic value only if the
rently
until the hedged sale affected current
strike price one can sell at is greater than
.
income
the current spot price. The difference between these two values times the notional
a futures contract, an option contract
amount represents the total intrinsic value.
ents a right, rather than an obligaThe time value of an option is measured by
hile the option contract requires the
subtracting the intrinsic value from the total
make an initial nonrefundable
4.
Unlike
repres
tion. W
holder
to
cash ou
to exp
must
become
5. An inte
variabl
rates
commitment to sell will become less valuarates. For example, assume that a
terest
company
able in
Concern
the bor
party
receiv
will b
the gains in value on the derivative instruassume the borrower agrees to pay
ample,
ment.
xed in exchange for receipt of a va-
6.5% fi
riable
their i
475
Derivatives ModuleExercises
EXERCISES
EXERCISE 1
Because the option hedges a forecasted transaction, the only impact on earnings
prior to the
transaction actually taking place and then, in turn, affecting earnings itself w
ill be changes in the
time value of the option.
The impact on earnings for the first and second 30-day period is a charge agains
t earnings of
$2,000 and $2,500, respectively, to be recognized as an unrealized loss on the h
edge.
30 Days
Expiration
Beginning
Later
Date
500
$1,200
$1,201
500
$4,500
$5,000
Regarding the hedge against a fixed rate loan, the impact on earnings would be t
he fixed interest expense as adjusted for the settlement of rate differences determined as fol
lows:
First
30 Days
Next
30 Days
476
----------------------- Page 3-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
EXERCISE 2
Corn Futures
June 1
June 30
July 31
150,000
3.42
3.56
(Note
A)
Note A: Because the July 31 spot rate is greater than the June 30 spot rate, th
e contract has no in-
trinsic value. Therefore, the value of the contract must be traceable to time va
lue.
As a result of the above hedging activity, the following changes would occur:
June
July
...
Total ....................................................
$ 4,500
$
(1,500)
477
----------------------- Page 4-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
Exercise 2, Concluded
Wheat Futures
June 1
June 30
July 31
150,000
6.20
6.35
As a result of the above hedging activity, the following changes would occur:
June
July
1,500
1,500
3,000
Total .....................................................
$
1,500
..
EXERCISE 3
20X3
June 30
(1)
December 31
478
----------------------- Page 5-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
EXERCISE 4
a.
(2) Several factors that could suggest that the hedge is highly effective incl
ude the following:
The term of the option corresponds with the term of the commitment.
(3) An option may provide more flexibility than a futures contract because an
option does not
have to be exercised if it is out-of-the-money, unlike a future. Therefor
e, if corn prices increase above the strike price of $1.51 a bushel, the company is not obliga
ted under the option to sell at the strike price. The only cost incurred by the company in
that case is the initial cost of the option.
(4) The value of an option consists of two components: intrinsic value and tim
e value. The former represents the extent to which the current spot price compares favorab
ly to the strike
price. In the case of a put option, if the current price is less than the
strike price, then the
option has intrinsic value. The time value of an option reflects a variety
of factors including
the time until expiration and potential price volatility. Therefore, even
if there is no intrinsic
value currently, there may be time value in that things could change so th
at the option ultimately has intrinsic value. Obviously, at the expiration date, no
time value is associated
with an option.
(5) Granted, with an option you are either in-the-money or you are not. Theref
ore, an option
may not have a negative value. However, at inception, one must pay for the
option, and this
cost is incurred regardless of subsequent developments affecting the value
of the option.
One can certainly lose money on an option to the extent of this initial co
st.
(6) The initial time value component of an options value is allocated to earnin
gs over the period of the term of the option. The amount of time value allocated to each
period is determined by measuring changes over time in the time value of the option. The
time value of
the option at any point in time is determined by subtracting from the valu
e of the option the
intrinsic component of value leaving the time value component.
479
----------------------- Page 6-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
EXERCISE 5
(1)
April 1
April 30
May 31
June 15
1,0
00
1,000
1,000
1,000
00
700
701
695
5,000
1,0
1,0
5,000
Apr.
1 Investment in Option .....................................
.......................
1,000
Cash ................................................
.................................
1,000
To record payment of option premium.
....................
...................
........................
May 31
Firm Commitment ..........................................
.......................
1,000
Gain on Commitment ..................................
1,000
.....................
...................
........................
480
----------------------- Page 7-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
Exercise 5, Concluded
June 15
Loss on Commitment ......................................
.....................
2,000
.......................
....................
....................
........................
Cash ....................................................
.................................
5,000
........................
Instructor s note: The net effect on earnings of the fair value hedge is
as follows:
Without the
With the
Hedge
Hedge
(2) If the strike price had been $698 per ton, the hedge would not have been t
otally effective.
The commitment would have still lost $5,000 and the option s in
trinsic value would have
gained only $3,000 [($698 $695) 1,000].
481
----------------------- Page 8-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
EXERCISE 6
(1)
February 28
February 20
April 20
March 31
300,000
300,000
1.60
Spot price...................................
1.59
1.62
1.64
1.60
1.61
3,000
12,000
800
500
3,800
12,500
Feb. 20
Investment in Option ....................................
........................
3,800
Cash ................................................
.................................
3,800
To record payment of option premium.
28
...............
........................
Mar. 31
Investment in Option ....................................
........................
6,000
Other Comprehensive Income ..........................
6,000
...............
....................
........................
Apr. 20
Investment in Option ....................................
........................
6,000
Other Comprehensive Income ..........................
6,000
...............
....................
........................
Cash ....................................................
.................................
12,500
........................
482
Derivatives ModuleExercises
Exercise 6, Concluded
May
3
...................
Cash .................................................
................................
489,000
To record purchase at $1.63 per pound.
During
May
Inventory of Food ........................................
.........................
489,000
Inventory of Soybean Meal ............................
489,000
..................
June
Cost of Sales ............................................
............................
240,000
..............
.........................
(2) The net effect on earnings with and without the cash flow hedge is as foll
ows:
Without the
Hedge
With the
Hedge
..
If the forecasted purchase had not been hedged, there would hav
e been a $4,200 decrease in earnings.
483
----------------------- Page 10-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleExercises
EXERCISE 7
(b)
(1)
(a)
Interest
(c)
Loan Balance
Interest at
Received from
Original
Counterparty
Inte
rest Paid to
at Beginning of
Co
unterparty
Quarter
Rate (4.5%)
Amount
at Rate (4.2%)
Rate
Quarter 1 ...................................
00* $1,350,000
$1,260,000
$1,275,000
$120,000,0
4.25%
000
Quarter 2 ...................................
1,307,813
1,220,625
1,264,219
116,250,
4.35
000
Quarter 3 ...................................
1,265,625
1,181,250
1,082,813
112,500,
3.85
000
Quarter 4 ...................................
1,223,438
1,141,875
992,344
108,750,
3.65
$5,146,876
$4,614,376
$4,803,750
(2)
(b)
Interest
Received from
Counterparty
(c)
at Rate (4.2%)
Net Payment
(a)
Loan Balance
Interest Paid to
at Beginning of
Counterparty
Rate
Quarter
Amount
Quarter 1 ...................................
00* $1,102,500
3.55%
$170,625
$105,000,0
$
931,875
000
Quarter 2 ...................................
1,063,125
3.55
164,531
898,594
,000
Quarter 3 ...................................
1,023,750
3.55
158,438
865,313
,000
Quarter 4 ...................................
984,375
3.55
152,344
832,031
$4,173,750
$645,938
101,250,
97,500
93,750
$3,527,813
(3) Using the LIBOR rate of 3.55%, the net present value of the net payments a
t the beginning of the second year of the swap is
$632,120 [the net present value of the four net payments ($170,625; $164,5
31; $158,438; $152,344) discounted at 3.55%/4].
(4) As the floating rate decreases relative to the receive fixed rate, the val
ue of the swap increases. If the spread between the receive fixed and pay floating begins to decrease, the value of the swap wil
l decrease. The value of the swap is also influenced by
the amount of time remaining on the swap. In essence, the value of the swa
p reflects the present value of the anticipated net
payment over the remaining term of the swap.
484
----------------------- Page 11-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
PROBLEMS
PROBLEM M-1
(2) The hedging activity that has an impact on other comprehensive income is t
hat which is
associated with cash flow hedges. Some of the hedges are used with respect
to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in foreign c
urrency exchange rates or
commodity price changes. In addition, the company uses interest rate swaps
and treasury
lock agreements as cash flow hedges.
(3) A cash flow hedge is used to establish fixed prices or rates when future c
ash flows could
vary due to changes in prices or rates. The interest rate swaps that are u
sed as cash flow
hedges are designed to hedge against the adverse effects of variability in
cash flows associated with existing debt that has variable interest rates or with forecas
ted transactions, as
is the case with the treasury lock agreements related to the anticipated f
ixed rate note issuance to finance the acquisition of York. A fair value hedge is used to o
ffset changes in
the fair value of items with fixed prices or rates. The interest rate swap
s that qualify as fair
value hedges are not hedging against variability in cash flows but rather
hedging against
changes in the value of fixed rate debt. The company hedged both its fixed
rate 5% notes
maturing in November 2006 and its 6.3% notes maturing in February 2008. In
both cases,
the company received a fixed dollar rate of interest and paid interest bas
ed on a floating
rate of LIBOR plus basis points.
(4) The hedge of the 6.3% notes requires the company to pay a fixed rate of 6.
3%. Anticipating
that variable or floating rates would result in lower interest expense, th
e company agreed to
pay to a counterparty a floating rate of LIBOR plus 283.5 basis points in
exchange for a
fixed rate of 6.3%. The rate is reset every three months. Regarding the im
pact on earnings,
the gain or loss on the swap would be recorded as a change in the value of
the swap and
an offsetting gain or loss would be recorded as an adjustment t
o the basis of the debt.
Therefore, the net effect would be zero. However, the fixed interest expen
se on the debt
would be adjusted (increased or decreased) to reflect the settlement of in
terest rate differences. If the floating rate paid were less than the fixed rate received, t
he company would
experience a decrease in interest expense.
485
----------------------- Page 12-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
PROBLEM M-2
(1)
September 30
Corn Futures
October 31
September 1
November 5
$
$
1,000,000
$2.5000
$2.5100
$2.5710
61,000
1,000
Change ..................................
38,000
$
30,000
$
500
difference ...............................
(6,000)
$
(2,000)
September 30
Wheat Futures
October 31
500
September 1
November 5
2,000,000
$3.5150
$3.5210
$3.5705
$
$
$
99,000
(1,000)
$7,030,000
7,096,000
$
Change ..................................
66,000
$
44,000
$
difference ...............................
(4,000)
$
(6,000)
(1,00
0)
Sept. 1
ct.
30
.................
................
...................
..............
486
----------------------- Page 13-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
Oct. 31
................
...............
..................
..............
Nov.
5
................
..................
...............
..............
Cash .....................................................
..........................
230,000
.................
...............
.........................
21
.............
...................
..................
(2) Factors that might cause the futures contracts to not be highly effective
include the following:
a. Changes in the price of wheat and corn may not correlate as highly w
ith the change in
the price of flour due to costs associated with producing flour.
487
----------------------- Page 14-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
PROBLEM M-3
June 15
June 30
September
420,000
$
$
2.09
2.10
8,400
(8,400)
Note A: The contract expires in September; at that time, the spot/future rate i
s greater than the
contracted future rate. Therefore, the contract has no value at its expiration d
ate.
As a result of the above hedging activity, the following account balances would
result:
2nd
3rd
Quarter
Quarter
Income statement accounts:
Gain (loss) on inventory change ...................
$
6,300
(6,300)
6,300
2,100
2,100
(6,300)
8,400
488
----------------------- Page 15-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
Wheat Futures
June 15
June 30
July 31
Number of bushels .............................
630,000
630,000
630,000
2.12
2.1
2.15
2.
$ 18,900
18,900
16,380
rates) ..................................................
2,52
3,104)
B)
(3,276)
(1
C)
Gain (loss) on futures due to:
Change in intrinsic value ...............
14,490
(Note
16,380
D)
Change in time value .....................
(1,890)
(Note
2,520
D)
Total income statement values ............
(1,890)
2,520
(1
3,104)
B)
(3,276)
ment
C)
Increase (decrease) in futures con12,600
18,900
tract
Note B: This represents the impact of the hedge on existing inventory (12/15 of
the change in
intrinsic value).
Note C: This represents the impact of the hedge on the firm sales commitment (3
/15 of the
change in intrinsic value).
Note D: This represents the change in value traceable to both hedges.
489
Derivatives ModuleProblems
490
----------------------- Page 17-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
PR
OBLEM M-4
(1)
nterest
I
Date
Amount
Payment
Quarterly Rate
Principal
Balance
$1,136,408
11,611,594
1,136,408
10,620,331
1.25%
1.25
1,136,408
9,616,677
1.25
1,136,408
8,600,477
1.25
Totals ........................
$555,490
$3,990,142
$4,545,632
(2)
nterest
I
Date
Amount
Payment
Quarterly Rate
Principal
Balance
Totals ........................
$223,750
$
(3)
$115,000
1.1500%
10,000,000
108,750
10,000,000
1.0875
$223,750
Balance at
Receive
t Interest
Date
Fixed Rate
Beginning
Stated Interest
Net Swap
of Quarter
Pay
Ne
Floating Rate
Interest
on Note
Expense
March 31, 20X8 .............
1.1875%
$
7,383
$12,590,619
1.1875%
$157,383
11,611,594
10,620,331
$15
1.1625
142,242
1.1000
123,461
9,616,677
Totals ........................
$(26,621)
1.0375
120,208
$555,490
528,869
(4)
Balance at
Receive
t Interest
Date
Fixed Rate
Income
Net Swap
Beginning
Stated Interest
of Quarter
Interest
Pay
Floating Rate
Ne
on Note*
$10,000,000
1.1500%
$122,500
10,000,000
Totals ........................
$ 1,250
1.0875
116,250
$238,750
240,000
491
----------------------- Page 18-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
(5)
.
.......
(6) In addition to the risk that the interest income on the note would decline
due to falling variable interest rates, there is now a concern due to changing currency exchange rates. If the interest income is t
o be received in euros and the euros are exchanged into dollars, it is possible that the number of dollars received could decl
ine over time. This would be the case if the euro weakened
relative to the dollar.
492
----------------------- Page 19-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
PROBLEM M-5
July 10
July 31
August 31
Sept. 10
100,000
100,000
$5.00
$5.10
$10,000
$32,000
$10,000
$20,000
July
10
...............
Cash ..................................................
..........................
20,000
To record payment of option premium
(100,000 $0.20).
31
...............
Aug.
31
...............
............
.........
Sept. 10
.............
........
...............
Cash ......................................................
.........................
33,000
...............
15
Inventory of Silver .........................................
.....................
533,000
............
Sept.
.................
..................
........
493
----------------------- Page 20-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
Sept.
.........
.......................
Oct.
.................
...................
To record sales.
.........
.........
.......................
PROBLEM M-6
July
a.
August
September
Total
Call Option A
Unrealized gain (loss) on commitment:
10,000 ($45 $46) .................................................
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
400
(1,400)
b.
Call Option B (hedge not effectivedoes not qualify for special hedge accoun
ting)
Unrealized gain (loss) on option:
....
....
....
........
494
Derivatives ModuleProblems
July
c.
August
September
Total
Put Option C
......
287,500
........
00
....
100,000
d.
Futures Contract D
Change in time value excluded from effectiveness:
[($9.94 $9.95) vs. ($9.90 $9.92) 10,000] ..........
100
$
100
e.
56,6
56,6
55,8
67
67
33
Settlement of fixed variable difference:
....
1,667
2,500
58,333 ...................................................................
.......... $ 173,334
495
----------------------- Page 22-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
PROBLEM M-7
(1)
20X2
Dec. 31
Interest Expense .........................................
.........................
800,000
Cash .................................................
................................
800,000
To record interest expense
[(7% + 1%) $20,000,000 1/2 year].
....................
..............
20X3
June 30
Interest Expense .........................................
.........................
810,000
Cash .................................................
................................
810,000
To record interest expense [(7.1% + 1%)
$20,000,000 1/2 year].
Cash .....................................................
................................
10,000
..............
...................
..............
.........................
Dec. 31
Interest Expense .........................................
.........................
790,000
Cash .................................................
................................
790,000
To record interest expense [(6.9% + 1%)
$20,000,000 1/2 year].
..............
Cash .................................................
................................
10,000
...................
496
----------------------- Page 23-----------------------
Derivatives ModuleProblems
20X4
June 30
Interest Expense .........................................
.........................
780,000
Cash .................................................
................................
780,000
To record interest expense [(6.8% + 1%)
$20,000,000 1/2 year].
....................
..............
Cash .................................................
................................
20,000
(2)
Six-Month Pe
riod Ending
Dec. 31,
Dec. 31,
June 30,
June 30,
20X3
20X2
Total
20X4
20X3
8.0%
8.1%
8.0
8.0
Interest expense:
0,000
$800,000
$3,180,000
$81
800,000
800,000
3,200
,0
10,000
00
Difference ......................
$(10,000)
$(20,000)
0
$
$
(20,0
Unfortunately, in retrospect, the company would have been better off not
to have engaged
in an interest rate swap. The swap resulted in an additional d
ecrease in earnings of
$20,000.
(3) The LIBOR rate on December 31, 20X3, would have had to be 7%. This would h
ave resulted in an 8% (7% + 1%) variable interest rate for the final 6-month pe
riod. If that were
the case, then total interest expense would have been $3,200,000 whether
or not there was
a hedge.
497