Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ll
F
T
T
T
George
T Milkovich
Cornell Univeisiry
Jerry Newman
Srare Universiry of
NewYork-Buffhlo
Bruce Gerhart
Universiry of Visconsin-Ma&son
Nina Cole
Ryerson Universiry
Margaret Yap
Ryerson Universiry
I
I
mffif,.}r::
1
Chapter 2
Chapter
I
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
The PaY
Job
AnalYsis 56
107
Structures
81
t
tI
Level 134
lll
Pay
60
189
Pay 215
Pay-for-Performance
lV
12
Chapter 13
Benefits
Structures
10
Chapter 11
Chapter
Evaluation
Chapter
PART
J
J
PART
PART
PAHT
Il
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Model
II
II
I
Plans
247
Endnotes 347
Glossary 368
Name
lndex
Subject
371
lndex
373
I
I
I
I
t
t
T
T
The Pay
'Why
Model
Should
\fe
DifferentSuategieswifiin theSameCompany 19
Strategic Choices 19
Care about
Stockholders 4
Managers 4
Employees 4
GlobalVews
Forms of Pay 5
Cash Compensation: Ba,se Pay 5
Cash Cornpensation: Merit Increases and Cost-
'
of-LivingAdjustments 6
Cash Compensation: Incentives
Long-Term Incentives 7
in Rewards 27
Align
The Organization
A Pay Model
as a
Four Policy
Pay
Book
Choices
AddValue
Nerwork of Rerurns 9
Plan
14
Review Questions
l5
12
15
Industry
vt
Case
13
19
28
Conclusion 30
Chapter Summary 30
KeyTerms 3l
Review Questions 3l
Techniques '13
Conclusion 14
Chapcer Summary
KeyTerms 15
Case
Objectives
28
Srrategic Compensation
Fit
DifFerentiare 28
Sociery 2
Support HR Strategy 22
\flhar is Compensation? 2
Compensation? I
31
PART I
lnternal Alignment: Determining
the Structure
B4
Defining lnternalAlignment 36
Compensation Suategy: Incernal Alignment 37
Suppons Organizacion Strategy 37
Concns
:S,rppottsVorkflo-n' 38
Modvates Behaviour 38
Srructurcs Vary Benreen Organizations 38
Levcls 38
Differeritals
EconorrfF[T0lisures 42
"ExternalStakeholders 42
Cut
Classiftcadon 70
Analpis
and Glob,li"-rion 72
Job
43
OrganizationStrategy 44
Job
Reliabiliry 72
Validiry 73
Acceptabiliry 73
Currency
AJudgment
53
Review Questions 53
Case 54
81
Multiple Plans 85
BenchmarkJobs 85
Both
Common
PerformJobAnalpis?
57
58
58
Procedures 59
\7'hat Information Should be Collectcd?
Job Data: Ideffification 6L
Employee Data 62
Level ofAnalysis 62
Evaluation
81
Single versus
56
Daa: Content 62
Evaluation
Job
KeyTerms
Job Analysis
Legal Compliance 52
Conclusion 52
Chaprcr Summary 52
IilZhy
75
76
Case 76
51
Job-BasedApproach: Most
74
Review Questions 76
Fairness 52
Analysis
Call
Condusion 74
Chapter Summary
KeyGrms
ConsequencesofStrucnrres 5l
Job
73
Uscfulness 73
EquityTheory:Fairness 49
ToumamentTheory: Motivation
and Performance 49
Insdtutional Theory: Copy Others 50
(More) Guidance Frorn the Evidence 50
Borders 72
JudgingJobAnal)rsis 72
Efficienry
Susceptibiliryo OGhoriog 72
Overdl HR Policies 44
'
65
- 65-
QuantitativeMethods 65
4l
'-'
Conventional Methods
39
''*'
6l
Point Metlod 89
.Net Worth: Federal Government Classiffcation
System
Modernizadon 89
PART
Appeals/Rwiew Procedures 98
Polidcal Influences 98
The Final Result: Job Structure 98
Balancing Chaos and Control 99
Conclusion 100
Chapter Summary
KeyTerms 101
100
Competitiveness 138
Conuol Costs 138
Case 102
Person-Based Pay
Structures
107
TypesofSkillPlans
Plans
co
Collecr?
Involve? l13
111
DeftningCompetencies
Compensating
I
I
SigndlingTheory
I
I
I
I
,
118
Objective i 19
119
to Involvel t 19
Btablish Certiffcation Methods L23
I
I
I
t25
Conclusion 129
Chapter Summary
Keytrms
130
130
Case
vllt
131
Markea
150
151
LeadPolicy I52
LagPolicy 152
.
.
Groups 153
Pies L54
Validiry/Usefirlness 126
Gender Bias in Internal Pay Strucrures
Organizarion'sStraregy 150
Relevant
Pidalls of
Mix
Decisions L56
Acceptabiliry 127
ThreeTypesofSructure 128
147
HumanCapitalTheory 147
Product Market Factors 748
A Dose of Realiry: \ftrat Managers Say 148
More Reality: Segrnented Supply of
Labour 149
OrganizationFactors 149
Industry andTechnolory 149
Collecd
Side
Reservation'WageTheory I47
117
\7h.at Information to
'Whorn
144
146
ll7
lHowTo": ComperencyAnalysis
Side
DifferentidsTheory 145
Efficiency\TageTheory 145
Structure
138
Competitiveness? 141
Iabour Market Factors I41
108
108
\iVhat Information to
Talent
Shapes External
I(tom
II
t27
Rates L57
Conclusion L57
Chapter Surnrnary 158
I(ryGrms
Review
Case
158
Questions
159
159
t'-
F=I
Contencs
Governmentlrnpcrus :90
Unions
Employer
Major Decisions
Specify Competitive PaY ?olicY 161
The Purpose of a Compensation Survey 161
Adjust Pay Level-How Much rc PaY? L62
Adjust Pay Mix-lfhat Forms? 162
Adjust PaY Structurc? 162
TheVdue
Types
Childcare Serviccs
Rcdur@dcfid[ Jffi
I
I
I
l
I
KeyTerms
2Il
Case 271
Vonh:
PAFT
tII
915
Employee Contributions:
lndividual Pay
Detarmiilg
185
ChapuSummary
KeyTerms 186
185
9*.
onfor
Design
PerformmceApl*c
217
'What
q[
Analysis I 88
Benefits
Pedormance:
and Plan
Employee
2M
Conclusion 210
Regression
X06
179
184
(EAFs)
180
Pricing
2fi1
Pbss
Condusion
f 9S
Retirement Pcnsion
Ratis 176
From Policy to Practice: ttre Pay Policy Line 177
From Policy to Practice: Grades and Ranges 778
'!7hy Bother with Grades and Ranges? L79
Market
198
ReconcilingDifferences 183
ofBenefits
Line 169
Verify Data 170
Pay
183
I
I
I
Strucrure
i$A
the Pay
:rn'*
Administrarionlssucs I92
Facors ln_fluen.i'g Bcncfir P,hln:ioE ]9
EmployerPrcfercne 193
lm
EstimateCompetitors'IabourCosts L62
Competitors 163
.Net
Plroling DedS.
andAdministratioo
Overlap
191
Bcocfrs l9t
ofEmployecBc,itr igi
Maxirnums
t*p.*
Cost-Effectivencss of
161
and
191
Management Zl8
189
'
lI
!
--.-..
Conenrs
ofPay?
Types of Group
Gain-Sharing
Profit-Sharing
227
227
StockOpdons 265
Broad-Based
(ESOPs) 265
Pay-for-Performance for Specid Employee
Groups 266
Compensation Suategy for Supervisors 267
Compensation Straregy for Corporate
Directors 267
Compensadon Suategy for
Compensadon Saategr for
Employees 272
Compensation Strategy for
Compensation Strategy for
ChaprcrSummary 277
'KeyTerms 277
Review Questions 278
Pay-for-Performance
Case
11
278
280
KeyTerns 242
PAHT IV
Case 244
Pay-for-Performance
Plans
247
Salespeople 274
Contingent
\Torkers 276
Tool 24I
Conclusion 24L
ChaperSummary 242
Execudves 267
Professional
Conclusion 276
Perfornance 240
as a
Fairness 240
LegisladveCompliance 240
Linking Pay with Subjectively Appraised
Promotional lncreases
261
'
Plaru
Earnings-at-fuskPlans 261
Plans 258
l2
rn
Role
in Compensation 282
PayPlans 249
Relationship 283
Supplyoflabour 283
Dernand for Iabour 283
Employment Snndards Acrs 283
IndividualSpotAwards 252
PaidYacation 285
'
PaidHolidap
?,85
SandardHoursofW'orkandOvenimePay 285
Pay on Termination of
Employment 285
Concn:s
Vork
bY
Thc Gender\0'age
GaP
Conclusion 319
Chapter Summary 320
KeyGrms
287
PayEquiryLegisladon 289
.Ner
t
t
Men
and'Wornen 286
Pay
Equiry at
CanadaPost 290
Condusions 292
Appendix
Pay Equiry
320
Determination 293
KeyTerms 298
Revicw Quesdons 298
'Case 298
'l 3
Costs
301
Choices 333
3A2
Conuol Salary
'
Compa-Ratios 310
Pay 310
Ana$ngCosts 311
Variable
Satisfaction 317
Pn)" Change Agent in Restructuring 3L7
Suucturing the Compensation Function 318
Cenualizarion-Decenffdization 3i8
Flo<ibiliry within Corporate-wide
Principles 318
Sysem iY
Sysem 337
National
Gerrnan Nationd
C'qr,
Canada 338
CurrentYear's
ffi
Smndardofliving: BaskctofGo&
andGernanModels 339
Strategic Market
Mindsct
F?G
Locdizer: "ThinkGlobal,AdL@f fi
Exporter: "Headquarters IGom Bcs{h
FitsAll" 340
Globdizer: "Think and Art CJohaet
and locallj"
Expatriate Pay 341
Elements of Expauiate
Thc Bdance ShcetApproad
F,xpatriate Systems' ObjectiteC
Cornpoir :}E
#t
+-l
Dommage! 345
Bordedes Vorld
Bordcdess
Pryi
Globdism 36
Conclusion 346
Endnotes 347
Glossary 368
Name
Index
371
373
Subjectlndex
!
I
I
!
!
I
I
I
!
I
A few books can change your life. This is probably not one of them. However, ifyou read it, you
will bener undersend rhat pay matten, After all, you car't pick up a newspaper, power up a comPuter, or read a blog today without someone tdking about pay. The Great Recession (our rerm)
has had huge ramificadons for pay. Some employees have had their hours cur or pay reduced.
lVhy? Because itt a more effective way to cur costs without laying
off workers. \Torkers still left
on payroll after all the recent cost-curing moves are the best of the besr Layoffs would mean
cutting the hean of the organization. Suryeys suggest workers faced with layoffs or reducdons
in hours almost always will choose shorter worhveeks ... at leasr in the shorr run! The recession
has also focused attention on executive compensation, In some cases, huge bonuses were paid to
execudves of compaaies receiving ftnancial aid from rhe governmenr.
Pay also mafters-around rhe globe. For examp.le, if you are a Russian asffonaur, you can
earn a bonus of$1,000 for every spacewalk (technically known as "exrravehicular activity," or
EVA), up to three, per space tiip. A concract lisdng specific tasl<s so be done on a space mission
permia you ro earn up to $30,000 above the $20,000 you earn while you are on the ground. (In
conlras! to the Russian asuoonauls, wealrhyAmericans are lining up ro pay $t5 million [plus
an addidond $20 million airfarel rc the Russian Space Agency for their own personal EVA)
Conclusion; Pa! m.ttters.
Some problems ue global. A British telephone company paid a cash bonus based on how
fast operators completed reques$ for information. Some operarors discovered chat rhe fastest way
to complere a reque$ was to give out a wlong number or-even faster-just hang up on the
caller. "'Wete acually looking at a new bonus scheme," says an insighrful company spokesperson.
Conclusionr lVhat yu pal for mdtterl
In *ris book, we suive to cu.ll beliefs from facts, wishful thinking from demonstrable results,
and opinions from research. Yet when dl is said and done, managing compensadon is an art. As
with any arr, nor everphing rhat can be learned can be taughr.
This fourth Canadian edition concinues to respond to the dernand on the part of Canadian
faculty and students for a Canadian version of the unique perspeciive on compensation taken by
M ilkovich/Newm anl Gerharr/Cole/Yap.
The textbook is based on the strategic choices in.managing compensation, These choices,
which confronr managers in Canada and around the world, are introduced in the rotal compensation model i.n Chapter 1. This model provides an integradng Framework used throughour, Major
comPensation issues are discussed in the context of current theory research, and pracrice. The
practices illusuate new developmenw as well as esablished approaches to compensadon decisions.
Each chapter guides the sudent to a \(/'eb F,xercise on the Connect website to point you to
some of the v:rst compensation.informadon on the lnterner. The case study ac rhe end of each
chapter asks the student to apply rhe concepts and techniques discussed in rhe chapter. For
example, the case in Chapter 11, "Pay-for-Performance Plans," guides che student g1so"gh sweral
exercises designed to explain how stock opcions work and how to vdue them. It also connects the
student to real-tirne srock prices for up-to-dace scock option valuarions.
xi!'
He
WHAT,S NEW
Ail
becn
reinfors our
cotrYictioo
I
I
I
I
I
dat
The
administration has had several company &nples added to -"ke rhe material more realiry-based.
twe have dways used internacional examplcs in everF scction; we have also updarcd the appendix
on global compensarion. M*y of rf,e Wcb crciscs, cascs, and .Net Won*r features have been
updated or replaced.
The book inciudes a margin icon aext to material that is direcdy relevant to rhe 25
compensation-related Required Professional Capabiliria covced in rhe National Knowledge
Exam, orie of the requiremenm for thc C-cnificd Ffuman Resourccs Professional (CHR?)
designadon from dre Canadian Council of Ffuman Rcsourccs Associadons. A lisr of eJl 250
comlensadon-relarcd sub-capabilities maf bc found on &e Milkovich Compensation Connecr site.
@
fficormect"
2,
J.
4.
t
t
The "meat" of each chapter irr these pans (f3 chapters in total) is interspersed with and
followed by additional material provided to supplement the chapcert contents and provide both
I
I
I
The PayModel: The unique Milkovich Pay Modd around which the
tent is based is introduced up front, and is integrated tluoughour all
subsequent chapter discussions.
@rhttt.sff&ryt.!@.tul*
shH*rdhq
*t bm°ryh
hm
l&kdxdFdkbd.l&.dbN.rnuE
ffihd.@dtl
&cffiffirfr$ttw
lrlbbd Mdlikbddifi
.mdFlir4b.
Eh{dhffiffi6Fl*ds!6l@
rdtrdh..&o.{tfuburK
hrhbhs4
t.dffffiUdl'qIl4dbldrd
4dU.
dtdkSdhhd;drd&dd6turrr
lll6dt.a&.8
@bFt.t!&kffidfr
.th|Fdhdd.kbhm
tuFxthr4
d.6ddtu.&btuFr.dbGh
crw@.dddtu'.Mlhrtth
drF.
the chaprer.
xiii
--..--J.!r
I
I
I
I
I
PrcFacc
Keylbas
highlighted in boldface
,.:ija"di.:.:aJ1"r
...
Key Terms
allowances
compensation
cost-of-tiving
adjustment
internal alignment
merit increase
procedufal fairness
external
relational returns
incentives (variable
ompetitiveness
pay)
salary
total rewards
wage
work/life programs
ExHEn
1,1
Siltt;tT"I"*',,grT
EM
15
10
5
ifarsrrrE:grgr4.E
ffi
"1.4q.6.t$"p
ru
.dningE ot
96
M.
ffiinEE
gFF
ffi
ir un.djded.
dd
Hffi,
dilebsq
.r6rd
m 02082012.
Review Questions
1,
2.
How does the pay model help organize one! thinking about compensation?
3.
What can a pay system do for an organization? For an employee? Are these mutually
ex(lusive?
Experiential Exercises
1. What is your deflnition of compensation?
2.
List all the forms of pay you receive from work. Compare to someone elseS list, Explaln any
differences.
3,
is the "nEt^rork of retums" upon your completion ofthe program at your cur.ent
institution? Do you think these are achievable? What are the some o{ the things you can
offer your employer?
4.
Answer the two questions in this chaptE/s Conclusion, above (Why do it this way? 50
what?), for any study or business article that tells you how to pay people. Such artlcles can
be found inlhe WorldatWork lournal or Compensation and Benefib Review.
xtv
what
Pr&cc
LEARNING OUTCOMES
.
.
dfltiry he bur
adil'r
.
.
Eteps to
bdop
btalcompensation stategy,
6e oqad-
straEgy.
is a
souie
Chepter Summary
Thc
Csse
bl&lffilF
EdEk*.a
Sm 16mb
rd!&tlddldbHF
eFa
a ffi
bld
tu6r C4. ob GE b. diq qfr
F 6n l a*. tu+hEdtd
tsU ffihrtu..d.fi6
Fiha turrnrynsn$hdFil,hrffiat*Sdttl4db
doG ['rolhr
{V b 6nry.Fr&E
rld.rl.rq fr.l$ aidryUly{li d !rrlEld& -qrfitaf rtEatb
tdr.n(
ntu*hq rd
'@h.
s#daE:dD. Orar ld9. FamF@msl4H
b *Sm
A
s,.ddc ! ! ddgd b blp lt6 !|&
..Fb!6 hsldlr.fdEE.4en6d-ts-c&-l
M6 ?dbuEllF h bdtulrdall-.l_*.L-
lryrsFrrtqr-EEnlq4.gE
.rxaqr tus'kq.Fddtl6.fl
hm 6 ffi
GBr.Fofr
W-tlJb*t-Ird
l*Pbhi*
hn dfr.Gtrfu @
dllF*adtffFdbdr
(hsrb6
L hroqby6dh.Eh:drL---t-i
. qFffil
a tu!ffi.t@bdAf
rhd?bdF-r
urlryffihffi!hbr-t
t. Sd&ffidFtthhF-FkdFE*ffit
$uE 'M. hondlF'
q4!t4.
r--rJtl-lqt
@
ll
Prefacc
of the icon shown here. Whenever you see dris icon in the margin beside chapter content, simply
look to the inside &ont-covrerbf dris book for a link to the required comperency. Note: For rhe
sake of brwity and simplicicy, we have included only the Total Compensation competencies fgr
which the scudent will be responsible in the CHRP exams; these RPG are not cross-referenced rc
other functiond areas. A list of all 250 compensation-rglated sub-capabilities rnay be found on rhe
Milkovich Co rnpercation Connect site.
ffiffi"
assessmenr plaforn that gives students the means ro better connect with their coursework, with their insrructors,
and with rhe imponant concepn *rat they will need to know for success now and in the future.
\7ith Connect, instructors can defiver assignments, quizzes, and tesr online, Instructors
can edit existing quesrions and author entirely new problems; uack individual student performance-by question, assignment or in reladon to the class overall-with detailed grade reports;
incegrate grade reports easily with Learning Managernent Systems (LMS) such as'\fl'ebCT and
Blackboard; and much more!
By choosing Connect, instructors are providing their studenrc with a powerftrl tool for
improving academic performance and tnrly masteririg course material. Connect allows studena
to practise irnportant skills at their own pace and on their own schedule. Importantly, students'
assessment results and instructors' feedback are all saned online-so studenm can continually
rwiew their.progress and plot their course to success,
Connect dso provides 2417 onllne access to an e-book-an online edition of the text-to aid
them in successfully complecing rheir work, wherever and whenever they choose.
Insuuctorts Manual
'Western
prepared by Narasha Koziol, University of
Ontario, contains
listing
chapter
and
a
oflearning
objectives,
a detailed lecture oudine,
a shorr topic oudine ofrhe
answers to review questions, eriperiencial exercises, summary of chapter content and a casc
discussion outline.
xl/t
*The 'Managcment in thc Movies" vidcos are not liccnscd for distribution ouaide
adopting instrucrors arc able to access the Instructor Notes.
of rhe United
Stetes; however,
I
t
I
Prcga
The Managert Hodeat is a rcsource within the Asset Gallery that allows srudents to watch
apply thglr=years of orperience to confront daily issues such as ethics, diverover l4real man4gers
rh. rnirurl workplace. Srudents are prompted for their feedback thioughout
""'*. "r-*orf., "ttl
olh r.rnuio and asked to submit a repon cridquing the managert choices, while defending rheir
for grouP or classroom discussions.
own, Thg Managcrt HotSeat is ided
For more informadon on rhe latest technology and Learning Solutions offered by McGraw-Hill
Rycrson and its panners, please visit us online: www.rncgrawhill.calhe/solutions.
cffi
mj
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
difference'
jl?lE.
fits. "
Technotogy that
i +::H'i:?&'lif;
rHI
!|
custom
tuint&
asilat t
I
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many people have contributed to our understanding of compensation and to the prepararioa
of rhlr io.rbook ln parricular, we thanlc dre following inssuctors whose cornments and suggesrions chroughout the review and development process gready added to the value ofthis four&
Canadian editioa:
Anna Bortolon, Cone*oga Colhge, School of Business
'
Julie Bulmash, George Brown Colhge
'Wenlu
Feng, Centennial Colhge, School of Busines
Roger Gunn,/R Shau School ofBusines
Ying Hong, McMaster Uniaersity DeGroote School of Business
Michelle lnnes, [Jniaersity of Albma
Sara Mann, Untuenity of Gaelph
Jody Merrin, St. Chir College
David Morriso n, Durham Colhge, School of Businas, IT and Mailngement
Jude Udediba, Crrant McEwan UniaeniE, School of Buines
d
.,-3[.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
LO1 Describe how compensation is viewed differently by sociery, sio(iri:':e-:
managers, and employees in Canada and around the world'
[02
105
r_I
lvhy
care abour compensation? Perhaps you find life goes more smoothly when there-is at ieast
ofwhy you
as much mooey.o*irrg in as going ouL Perhaps you would like to solve dre mystery
in the
people
too,
about
are
curious,
you
do.
Perhaps
*rey
*.y
,h.
paid
get
yo,,
or people
aia Beyonci earn $80 million one yar, whereas Britney Spears earned
news and rheir pay.
Lo*
lfni
$2.2j million?t'\flhy did Jusdn'Bieber earn $53 million and Selena Gomez only $5.5 million?2
'Why
did workers ar General Morors in the United States get total compensation of-about
$60 per hour, whereas U.S. workers ar Toyota got $48 per hour? \flhy was the average total comperrsarion per hour in manufacruring$25 in the U.S., but $16 in Korea and $3 in Mexico? !7hy
iia Cl.r,b.'Wesron (Execurive Chairman of.Loblaw) earn about $3.9 million in 20i0, wher-'
fuchard lfaugh (CEO of RBC) earned almost $14 million?
More im'po.tantly, does ir mac[er how much and ho* fiese people get paid] \fle will certainly ta.lk about employee and executive pay in this book. Lett take a brief look at a few examples
fte
te r le:
Chaptcr
The Pay
Moltl
compensadon-related- Of course, building vehides that consumers did not want was also a problem. Buc having labour cosa higher than the comperition, without corresponding advantages in
efficienqy, qualiry, and customer service, does not seem to have served GM or its stakeholders
well. Its stock price, which pealred at$93.62 per share in April 2000, closed recendy at arouad
$27 per share. Ia market value was about $60 billion,in 2000. Shaeholder wealth will be wiped
our in banlruptcy; the U.S. taxpayers are out billions of dollars; and hundreds of thousands of
jobs have been lost wirh concomitant effects on the communicies involved.
On thc other hand, Nucor, the l4rgcltproducer of steel in dre United Sates, pays its workers veqF well relative to what other companies inside and outside of the steel industry pay. But
the company also has much higher producdviry than is typical in the steel industry. The result:
borh the company and its workers do well. Similarly, Google and SAS also pay their worlcers well.
Google announced a 10 percent pay raise and $1,000 cash bonus to all its workers in January
2011, went on a hiring spree for over 6,000 googlers and its stock price recendy hit $600 per
share. Revenues at SAS, the worldt largest privately owncd software company, have been on the
rise since its inceprion ia 1976, despite all the turmoil in the rnarkct.
'\?'ould
grearer expertise in the dcsign and cxecution of compensation plans have helped?
The U.S.'Congress and President Barack Obama seem to think so. They have put into place new
legislation, the Troubled Asset Relief Prograrn (TARI), which includes restrictions on executive
pay that are designed to discourage er.ecutives from tating "unnecessary and erccessive risks." In
Canada, we have "say on pay," which dlows shareholders to hold an annud vote on the pay of
an organizarion's executives. In 2011, about 70 major public companies have volunarily offered
their shareholdets a "voice'"
In a recent opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, "How Business Schools Have Failed
Business," rhe former Director of Corporate Finance Policy at the United States Treasury wrote
that "misaligned incentive programs are at tle core of what brought our financial rystem to its
'knees."4 He says rhar we "should ask how many of the business schools amended by Americat
CEOs and direcrors educate rheir srudens about che best way to design managerial cornpensation
slzstems," His answer: not many. This book, we hope, can play a role in helping to bemer educate
you, the reader, abour the design of compensacion systems, both for managers and for workers.
How people are paid affecm their behaviour at work, which affects an organization's chances
of success.5 For mosr employers, compensation is a major part of total cost of running a business, and often it is the single largest part of operating cost. These wo facts together mean that
well-designed compensation q/stems can help an organization achieve and sustain competitive
advantage.6 On the other hand, as have recently seen, poorly designed compensation q/stems clur
likewise play a major role in undermining organizition success.
T_I
WHAT IS COMPENSATION?
How people view compensation affects how they behave at work, It does not mean the same
thing to everyone. Your view probably differs depending on whether you look ar compensation
from the perspective of a member of sociery a stockholder, a m,rnager, or an employee. The following is a discussion of these various perspectives on compensation.
LO1
Society
Some people view pay as a mff$ur of justice. For example, a comparison of earnings of women
with those of men highlighrc inequides in pay decisions. In 2008, women earned 83.3 cents for
every dollar earned by mer, up from75.7 cents two decades earlier in 1988.7 Despite this narrowing, and despirc pay equiry legisladon, *rE'gap persists. Economists have identified a number
of conuiburing hctors ro we deterninadon, including human capial (work e<perience, educarion, and tenure), demographic characteriscics (marital status, having children living at home)
:
Chapter
I I
..d
il:H;;;mor.lik
*d
il"tdff;
:";;;;;;
i'
occupations,_whereas
"nJr.*iaa
as eq uiPment
-:
'_'
i:j;
oPerators'!
*re
gendel
shows
1.1
Exhibit
.gap in
lo.s Canada do, relative to otfier countries?
is definitely
Canada
countries.
oEcD
in-various
of full+ime employees working
France, and Norway'
rh:all counuics like l(orea and Japan, but worsc than Ausualia,
as e ca'se of loss of
are
listed
countries
b.*..tr
compensatioo
differences in
labour costs in
orample'
For
States'9
the
United
even
and
China,
C"r"ai* jobs to Mexico,
in
productivirJ'(fie
di-fferences
when
Howwer,
Canada.
in
of
those
iioi.o rr. "bo,rt 13 percent
considerably,
fo, .".h dollar of pay) are factored in, the wage advangge
-'tii*
-.d;;i"gs
lrt"J.".,
"*"3;;;;,
;.il; ;6;.
i.."*. ftfJ*""" productiviry
ls.5duced
".,
ir"i., *"*.,
;;il;;.
for labourers
news broke abour working con&dons and pay of vrorkers at Apple's largest
to raise its wages by i6 rc 25 percent.r2
if;", *d .5. company ha.
,;:.ndy,
,"ppfr.r],
"gr.J
40,
I
35t
30
520
Ets
10
5
T
T
t
I
t
I
HHH
\
is calculated as the.differenct
sender wage sap is unadjusted, and
*rg.
b"tt*iT:1?l-1tjli'g::l,T:,::1Y"f:i.?':m:: Il'Jil
o'o.r of t'. sender waee eap. Estimates orlarninss used in the calculations rerer to
thddefinition may slightly vary from one country to another'
However,
workers:
;nJtrlury
#ffi:]o|:;ll3,ll-l*!'i",lrj;i:'#"6.;*il
gross earnings of full-time
t
t
t
I
I
s2s
(!
*The
accessed on
O7nBn012'
I
t
Chapter
in rum
dilutes stockholder wealth and sometimes may not incentivize the behavior
Managers
From the perspcctive of the managers, compensation direcdy influences their success in rwo
ways, First, it is a rnajor o(pense. Competidve pressures, both global and locd, force managers
to consider rhe affordabiliry of their compensation decisions. Srudies show that in many enterprises, labour cos$ account for more than 50 pelcent of toral costs,!4 In some indusuies, such as
financial or professional services, or in education and governrnent, this figure can be even higher.
However, even within an industry (e.g., automotive manufacnrring financial services), labour
cosr as a percentage of total cosm varies among individual firms. For example, small neighbourhood grocerystores, with labour costs berween 15 percent and 19 percent, have been driven out
of business by supermarkets that delivered the same products at a lower cost of labours (9 to
12 percent). Supermarkets today are losing market share to the warehouse club stores such as
Costco and'!V'almarr, which enjoy an even lower cost of labour (4 to 6 percent).
In addidon to seeing pay as e major expense that has to be minimized or optimized, a
manager uses it to influence employee behaviours and to improve organizational performance.
The amount and rhe way pcople ue paid affects the qualiry of their work, their attirude toward
cusromers, their willingness to be flexible or learn new skills or sugtest innovations, and even
ttreir interesr in unions or pursuing legal action against their employer. This potential to influence
is an
Employees
The pay individuals receive in return for the work they perform is usually the major source of
their ffnancial security. Hence, pay pl+ a viul role in a person's economic and social well-being.
Employees may view conpensation as the return in an exchange between their employei and
themselves, as an entideme4t for being an employee of the company, or as a reward for a job well
donc. Compensation can bc all of these things.
Describing pay as reward may sound far-fetched to anyone who has reluctandy rolled our
^
of bed to go to work Even tlough writers and consultants use the term "reward," no one ever
says, "They gave me a reward increase," or "Here is my weekly reward cheque ," Yet, if people
see thcir pay as thc return for their contributions and investments rather than as a reward, and
if wrirers and consulents persist in trying to convince them that pay is a reward for employees,
this disconnect may mislead both employees and managers. Employees invest in education and
training; they contribure their time and enerry at the workplace, Compensation is their return
on those investments and contributioru.16
In sorne circumstances, employees in large, state-owned countries (e,g., China) and in
highly regulated counuies (e.g., Sweden) sometimes believe their pay is an endrlement-their
Chapccr
I I
The Pa1
Mokl
of rheir performance or rh2t of their employers. It is not uncommon for politiunioos, and employer ftderarions in countries such as Sweden and Germany_-uade
IJ-L"j"",
policies that are zupponive of their country's sociopolirical as well as
compensation
negodare
.t,,e- resardless
ro
economic Priorides'r/
GlobalViews
*compensation" refersm something that counterbalances, offsets, or makes up for
.o-.rhing else. Howwer, if we look at the origin of thc word in different languages,-we get a
,.*. of J. richness of its meaning, which combines enddement, rerurn, and reward.lS
In China, the traditiond characters for the word 'compensation" are based on the syrnbols
for logs and water-<mpensadon provides thc necessities in life, In the recent pa$, ttre sate
o,"n.J r[ *..qprises and compensadon was treated as an enddement. In todays China, howener,
the refonns of the last decades have led to use of a new word, dai ya, which refers to how one
is being gearcd-your wages, benefits, training opporcunities, and so on. Compensation now
In English,
on compen$tion-societal, stockholder,
managerial,
employce and even global-add richness to the topic. But these perspectives can also can$e confi.sion unless everyone i5 nlking about the same thing, so a clear definition of compensation is
essentid. Compeosaton rders to all forms offtnancial renuns and tangible services and bcncffts
that employees rcceive as parr of an employment relationship.
TT
LO2
compensation
all fozl:r of financial rewms
LO3
FOBMS OF PAY
Exhibit 12 shonn the variery of rerurns people receive from work. They are categorized as rotal
compensadon and reladonal rerurns. The relational renuns (learning opportunides, recognition
and *atus, challenging work, and so on) are the psychological returru people believe they receive
in t}re workplace.2l Totd com;rcruation is more transactional and includes pay received direcdy
'
,'6@
relational returns
psychologial rewrns enpbyees bdieve they
rreive inthe
workplae
total rewards
Cash Compensation: Base Pay
Base
work performed.
pay tends to reflect the valtie of the work or skills and generdly ignores differences amibutablc
to individual employees. For orample, the base wage for mac.hine operators may be $18 an hour.
Howerrer, some individual opera[o6 might receive more because of their experience and/or perforBas.e
mance. Some pay qrcrcms ser base wage as a function of the skill or educadon an employee possesses; this is common for engineers and schoolteachers. A distinction is often made bewreen a wage.
aad a sakry, the lamer referring ro pay o(pressed at an annual or monthly rate rather than hourly.
wage
pay erpressedatan hatrly
aE
salary
pay expressed at an annual or
monthl.v .ate
*-.--&!
Chaptcr 1
Tltt
PaX
Modet
Learning
Recognition and
Status
Employment
Life, Health,
Disability lnsurance,
and Pension
Base Pay
MeriVCost
of Living
T
T
T
T
t
I
t--
Long-Term
lncentives
Security
Opportunities
Challenging
Work
Allowances
Work/Life
Programs
Short-Term
lncentives
mrit
increase
itE'tgtt to
tqnitinof
base
pay in
pa*vwrk
Ddravfur
cost-of-livin g adjustment
reerrcge
increment to base
Fy pnnided
rqadlsof
to all employee
pedormance
Ahnost all Canadian ffrms use merit pay increases.22 Merit increases are given as increments
to the base pay in recogni-tion of past work behaviour. Some assessment oflast performance is
made, with or without a forrnal performanie evduadon progre-m, and the size of the increase is
varied according to performance. Thus, outstanding performers could receive a 6 rc 8 percent
merit increase 8 monrhs after their last increase, whereas an evere performer might receive a
2 to 3 percent increase after 12 or 15 months. By conuasr, a cost-of-livilg adiustment gives the
same petcentage increase to evrrrone regardless of performance in order to maintain paylevels
relative !o increases in the cost ofliving.
peiod
Incentives (or variable pay) de pay increases direcdy to perfornance. Howwer, incentives differ
from merit increases. First, incendves do not increase the base wage, arrd so must be reearned.each
gay geriod. Second, the potentid size of the incentive paymenr generally will be known beforehand. \ilfhereas merir pay programs evaluate th. pCIt-p.rfo.*i.. of L nd.irrid,ral an4 rhen
decide on the size of the increase, what must happ'en in order to receive the incentive paymenr is
called out veryspecifically ahead of rime. For example, an auto sales agent knows the commission
tJre sale. Thus, aldrough both
merit pay and incendves can influence performance, incentives do so by offering pay to irifluence
fururc behaviour. Merit, on the other hand, recognizes and rewards past behaviours. The distinction is a mamer of timing.
"r.
Chapter
I I
*
The Pat
I
I
I
Modcl
i""rrrft"
Long'Term Incentives
inrcnded to focus employee
Incendves may be short- or long-term. Long-term incentives are
or options to buy
form
of
stock
ownership
are
in
the
they
Typically
resula.
mulriy."r
""specified, advantagcous prices. Th-e idea behind stock ownerships is that employees with
iro.t "r
no-.i4 stake in the organization will focus on such long-term ffnanciel objecdves
of *ock
"
on-iou.*-.or, market share, and rerurn on net assets. Magna Internationd grants shares
success. Some
ftrmt
contribudons
to
the
made
outstanding
have
who
employees
key
,o ,.L.,.d
stock ownership beyond the ranla of managers and professionals. Sun
.o*o*i., have erctended
'Wesdet, and Starbucls offer stock opdons. to all their employees. These
Mi.roryrr.-r, Google,
believe rhat having a stake in the companysuppor$ a culture of ownership. They hope
il
.ff;
* T.*l
.o-o-i.r
,t
",.-ploy.o
n'ill
J
J
Exhibir 1.2 shows that emplope benefits, induding life/health/disabiliry insurancc and pension, worlc/life programs, and dlowances, are also part of totd compensation. Somc insurance
tiqtired by law. For example, in CanadA employcrs (and employees) have to
Drograms
"t
L"i'e .orruibt tions to rhe Canada/Quebec Pension Plan, Employmcnt Insufancc, and Worken
Compensation. Differenr counuies have different mandatory benefits. Somc Canadian comPanies also provide rheir employees with a pension plan, in addition to the mandatory Caaada/
pe*ion Plan. In iOOg, Zg.Z percent of working Gnadians benefft from an employer-
euebec
'
Health insurancg dental insurance, ;rcnsions, and life insurance are cornmon bcnefia. They
help protccr employees ftom the financid risk inherent in daily life. Often, companies can
prwii. these protections to employecs more.hoply than employees can obtain them for themi.lr"r. Bec**. tle cosr of prwiding benefis has been rising they are regarded as an increasingly
imponant form of compcnsation.26
progrems that help employees bener integrate their work and life responsibilides
from work (e.g., vacations, .iury duty), access to services to meet speciffc
include ti*.
"*"y
(e.g.,
needs
drug counselling, financial planning, referrds for child and elder care), and
(e.g., tdecomrnuting, non-ffadidonal schedules, non-paid time
flcxiblc -otk
"r"-g.ments
off). Rcsponding
to thc tight labour market for highly skilled employees and the changing
worUlife programs
prognmstltat help
..fnplqes betbrintegnte
theirwot* and life
rsponsibilities
d.mograihio oi th. *otkforce (e.g., two-income families who demand employer floribiliry
thai family obligations can be mec), rnany Canadian employers are gving higher p-rioriry
to thcse forms of b-encftts. Buffett Thylor & Associates, a leading wellness consulting ftrm in
Vhitby, Ontario, follows its own advice by offering a bcst-in'class wellness Program in its own
so
workplace.2T
Benefits: Allowances
Allowances often grow out of whatever is in short supply. In Vietnam and China, housing
(dormircries and apanments) and uansportation allowances are frequendy _PaE of the pay
package. Some Japanese companies continue to offer a "rice dlowance' based on the number
allowances
.
co m
-.--+-L
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
I:
Chapter
The Pay
Modd
Drawing on findings from this study, fielded with over 20,000 employees in 22 markets
between November 2009 and January 2010, and the broad economic. social, and business trends, the emerging "deal" in the employment relationship depends on the organization's ability to create a more personalized work experience for segment of the
.workforce, aligned with how people add value to the business. The presures in today's
work environment will continue to alter how businesses operate and how employees
connect to their organizations and work. Relational returns become all the more impor-
success.
ofdependents an employee has, a practice that grew out ofpost-\trorld 1i7ar II food shortages.
Almosr dl companies starting operations in China soon discover drat housing, $ansponadon,
and other allowances are expected. Companies that resist these allowances have to come up with
otler ways to afiract and retain talented employees. In many European counries, managers
expect a car to be provided. The issue then becomes which make and model.
In Canada, some organizations in Fort McMurray, Alberta, offer their employees housing
allowances due to t.he housing shortages and the high cost of accommodadons. The Government
of Nunavur provides its employees Norr"r.ot Northern Allowance to make up tlre differences in
"
the cost of living between Nunavut communities and larger "designated" southern centres, and
to egualize the compensation of Government of Nunavut employees across Nunavut who may
fue different economic conditions in different communities.2s
ChaPw
from Work
Relational Returns
\XArydoGooglemillionairescontinuetoshowupfolrytti*tymorning?Thereisoodo"-r-j-:effect on employees behavio*r Exhibit 1-2
work have a substantii
J"r]n"*.lirerurns from
recognition and status,
;;;;;riily
::;.,Frle
*tt Pfr.".'J;
#;;
environment'
in co&Yk "economic
of Returns
The Organization as a Network
Sometimes
returns
ir is useful to rhink of an organization as a nework of
creaced by
all thae
is to
atff.r.", f"r*s of
;.rn"';il;",*..k *
;.
i-p"ri*,
I--I
A PAY MODEL
first'
ro4
Jffi;ff;;;:il"f
*..
,ilply i.aa
j. hd;;,
i, *J
*{:l}i*fuods
Vt:k
*J
*."*r.i.
I
{
10
Chaprer
II
Work
INTERNAL ALIGNMENT
Analysis
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS
MANAGEMENT
Evaluation/
INTERNAL
PolicY Lines
PAY
STRUCTURE
Market
Definitioits
Surveys
5eniority- Performance-
Based
Based
Costs Communications
Merit
Guidelines
Change
INCENTIVE
PROGRAMS
EVALUATIoN
as important
make decisions about pay.30 It suggests that the wey a P^y decision is made may be
decision'
of
the
to employees as the result
io*pli*.. as a pay objective involves conforming to various federal, provincial, and territorial colpensation la-s "ttd regulations. fu these laws and regulations change, Pay systems
might need to be adjusted to .rrr.ri. continued compliance. As companies go global, they musc
also comply with the laws of all the counffies in which they operate '
Ther.'"r. probably as many statements of pay objectives as there are employers' In.fact,
highly diversifii firrrrr'ru.h as George'S7'eston Ltd. and One< Corp., which comPete in multiple
at
lin-es of business, mighr have different pay objectives for different business units. Objeccives
Chaper
i I
The Pal
Model
MEDTRONIC
WHOLE FOODS'
We are commit6d to
shareholder value.
Profits are essential to create apital for grorarth, prosperity, opportunrty job sadsfaction, and job seiurity.
of business.
Ensure
inceaing long-term
fair treatment.
6cse companies emphasize dre incrcased complcxiry of rhe business and imponaace of integrity
(orsmmers, qualiry), compedtiveness (costs), abiliry to aaiact and rerain qualiry people (pcrforoaoe), and having fun.
The tcnsion of working toward all the suaagic objecdves of efficiency, frirness, and ompliaae at times makes it ineviable that managing pa)r creates erhical dilemmas. Manip'bdng
resrlts rc ensure execudve bonus payouts, miql5iag (or failing to undersand) sgtisrics uSed to
rre:$urc comPetitors' Pay rates, re-pricing or backdadng stock opdons ro increase their nlue,
cocouraging employees to invest a portion of their wagcs in compary srock while executiv=s are
be.iling out, offering just enough pay to get a new hire in the door while ignoring the relationship
o co-wodcers'pay, and shaving dre hours recordcd in employecs'time cards are all-roocommon
rr
t
I
t
*"-ples of erhicd
lapses.
but not ali, compensation proftssionels and consultanrs remain silenr during edical
misconduct and outright malfeasance. Absent a professiond code, compensadon rnanagers musr
look to their own ethic+and the pay modd, which c.lls for combining the objectives of c&
ciency and fair uearmenr of employees as well as compliance.3l
Some,
I
I
so objecdves serve severd purposcs. Firsc thcT guide the design of the pay
rysem- c-oddcr
the employer whose objective is to reward s6s6slrling performance. That objective sill
mine the pay policy (e,g.ipay for performancc) .. *.ll
the elements of pay plans (c g,
increases and/or incentives). Another employer's objectives may be to develop a
, ootinuously learning workforcc drrough job desip, training and team-building rechniqucs A pcy
qystem'digned with thi. s employert objecdves might have a poliry of prying salaries et kzrt oqd
f-il't
dG*it
to those of competitors and that go up with incrcased skills or knowledge. This qlsco
-lgl'r
be very different &orn our ffrst examplc in which the focus is on p.rform.nce. Thu,s, dffi**
objectives guide the design of differenr pay q/stcms. Thcy also ,.-i ,. standards for jr$iog 6c
success of the pay $ystem. If the objective is to attract and rctain rhe best and rhe brigbc$,
Fr
skilled employees are leaving for highcr-paying jobs elsewhere, the system may nor bc pclh@ing effectively. Atrhough drere may be many non-pay reasons for rurnover, objeciwsFilidc
standards for waluadng the effecdveness of a pay qrstem.32 Policies and tcchniques are thc
to reach the objecrives.
*r.
I
I
I
._.._r-!
I
I
Chapter
LO5
The Pal
Mo&l
Internal Alignment Internal alignm66 refers to pay comparisons beween jobs or skill levels
inside a single organization. Jobs and peoplet skills are compared in rerms of theit relative contribution to the organizationt objecrives. For o<ample, how does the work of the prograrnmer
compare to the work of the systems analyst, the softrvare engineer, or the software architect? Does
one conribute more tfian another to providing solutions to custorners and satisfring stockholders? Does one require more knowledgp or experience than another? Internd dignmenc refers ro
rhe pay rares both for employees doing equal work and for those doing dissimilar work. In fact,
derermining an appropriate difference in pay for people perforning different work is a key chal-
internal alignment
pay comparisons
jobs
beveen
single organization
'
Internal dignment policies, or pay relationships within an organizadon, affect all three compensadon objecdves. They affect employee decisions to stay with the organization, to become
more flexible by investing in additional training, or to seek greacer responsibiliry. By motivating
employees to choose increased uaining and greater responsibility in deding with customers, pay
relationships indirecdy affect the capabilities of rlle workforce and hence the efficiency of the
enrire organizadon. Fairness is determined by employees' comparisons of their pay to the pay of
others in the organization. Compliance is affected by rhe basis used ro make internal cornparisons. Basic fairness is provided by Canadian human righs laws, which make pay decisions made
on the basis of race, gender, age, and other grounds discriminatory and illegal.
extenial competitiveness
ernpison of compenmtion
eicternal to rhe organizadon (i.e., compared with competitors). How should an employer position
its pay relative to what competitors are payiirg? How much should one employer pay accouncanu
'!7hat
mix of pay forms-base, i.ncendves,
in comparison to what other employers pay them?
stock, beneffa-will help achieve t-he compensation objectivcs? Employers have sweral policy
opdons. lfhole Foods combines base pay and team incentivcs to offer higher pay if team performance warrants. Medmonic sets iE base pay to match its competitors', but ties bonuses to
performance and offers stock to aII employees on the basis of company performance.33
Further, Medtronic believes chat its benefirc, particularly im emphasis on programs that balance work and life, make ir a highly attracdve place to work. It beliEves that how pay is posidoned
and what forrns it uses creates an advantage over competitors.
Many organizations claim their pay q/stems are market-driven, that is, based on what
competitors pay, Howwer, "market-driven' gets translated into practice in differenc ways. Some
employers ser their pay levels higher than those of their competition, hoping to acract the best
applicants. Of course, this issumes that someone is able to identify and hire the "best" from a
pool ofapplicana.
Chaprcr
should all employees share in rhe organizationt ffnancial success via incentives based on profft?
sharing ffnancial losses? Should more-productive tarns of employees be paid more
irfi",
"bou,
seams?
chan less-Productive
Management A policy regarding managernent of the pay system is rhe last building bloclc in
the pay model in Exhibit 1.3. Ahhough it is possible to design a qrstem that is based on internal
.ligrr-.n., octernal compeddvenes, and employee conffibudoru, the qatem will not achieve its
that the
obiecdves unless ir is managed properly. Proper management of the pay system ensures
right
the
right
way.
the
objectives
in
for
achieving
pay
right
the
get
people
riehr
- 1.l. groqnd under compensation management is shifting. The uaditional focus on how to
adminisrer various techniques is long gone, replaced by more strategic drinking-managing Pay
parr of rhe business. It goes beyond simply managing pay as an et(pense to beaer understanding
and anilyzrngthe impact of pay decisions on people's behaviours and organizations' success. The
impact of pay decisions on expenses is one resuh thar is easily measured and well understood' But
as
orher mexures, such as pays impact on atuacdng and retaining the right talent, and engaging
this elcnt productively, are not yet widely used in the managcment of compensation. Effons to
do so are increasing and che perspective is sffiing from "how to" toward "so what."
Pay Techniques
The remaining ponion of the pay model in Exhibit 1.3 shows the pay techniques. The exhibit prodroughout the rest of this book. Techniques
de the four basic policies to the pay objectives. Uncounted variadons in pay techniques ocisB
many are examined in this boolc Many consuldng firms tout lheir surve]'s and techniques on
their websites. Informadon on various practices can be obtained simply by surffng dre'Web.
TL
'
f-
E"
E4-
BOOK PI.AN
Compensation is such a broad and compelling topic that several books could be devoted to it.
The focus of dris book is on the design and management of compcnsation systems. To aid in
understanding how and why pay systems work, our pay model, which emphasizes ttre key strategic objectives, poLicies, and techniques, provides the structure for much of the book
ih"pt.r C dir"*ro how to formulate and implement a compensation suategy. It anabzes
what it means ro be strategic about how pioplc are paid and how compensation can help achieve
and sustain an organizationt competitive advantage. The pay model plays a central role in formulating and implementing an organizationt pay sffatery. The pay model identifies four basic
policy decisions that are the core ofthe pay straregf.
After suatery is discussed, the next sections of thc book will examine each basic policy
decision in detail. The first, internal alignment (Chapters 3 duough 6), examines pay relatiooships within a single organization. Two chapters in the next secdon (Chapten 7 and 8) CI<aminc
ercernal compeciriveness-thc pay relationships among compedng organizations-and analyzrs
the influence of market-driven forces.
Once compensarion rates and sructures are established, other issues emerg. How mucL
strou
should each employee be paid? How much and how often should an employeet pay be increascd.
13
14
Chaprcr
I I rkbModd
aad on s/har basis-<xpcricncc, senioriqr, or performance? Should pay furcreases be condngent
on the organizationt and/or the employee's performance? How should the organization share its
success (or failure) with employees? Stoci< awards, profft-sharing bonuses, merit pay? Thcsc are
questions relating to employee conuibutions, the third building block in the model (Chapters 9
and l0). Employee services and beneffts will be e4mined in Chapter 11. The role of governments and unions in compensation is explored in Chapter 12. The concluding chapter focuses
on rhe maragement of the compensation system (Chapter 13), which indudes understanding,
communicating, budgeting, and evaluadng resuks. More detail on global compcnsation systems
is provided in the Appendix.
Although this book is divided into sections that reflect rhe pay model, pay policies and
decisions are not discrete. In fact, all policy decisions are interrelated. Together, thry influence employec behaviours and organization performance, and can be a source of competitive
advantage.
Conclusion
The model presented in this chaprcr provides a stfl.rdure for undersanding compensation
sysrems. The three main components of the model include the objectives of the pay slstem,
the policy decisions that provide the qrstemt foundation, and the techniques that link policies
and objeccives. The following sections of the book ocamine each of the four policy decisionsinternal dignment, e<ternal competitiveness, employee conuibutions, and managemsnl-as $/gll
as rcchniques, new directions, and related research.
Two questions should constandy be in the minds of managers and readcrs of this text. First,
it this wry? There is rarely one correct way to design a systm or pay an irdividual.
Organizations, people, and circumstances are too varied. But a well-uained managr can sclect
or design a suitable approach.
Second, what does this technique do for us? How does it help achieve our organizational
goals? If good answers are not apParent, there is no point to the tcchnique. Adapdng the pay
q/stem ro meer rhe needs of the employees and helping to achieve the gods of the organization
is what this book is all about.
The basic premise of this book is that cornpensation systems have a profound impact. Yet,
too often, traditional pay systems seem to be designed in response to some historical but longforgotten problern. The practices continue, but the logic underlying them is not alwa;rs clear or
why do
even relevant.
D
i.
Chapter SummarY
People may have different perspecdves on compensation. From dre socieml perspective,
compensadon is viewed as a measure of jusdce as well as a cause of incieased taxes and price
increases. Stockholders believe that paying employees in stock creat* a sense ofownership
that will improve organizational performance. Managers view cornpensation as a major
o(pense and a means to influence employee behaviour. Employees view cornpensation as a
rerurn in an exchange with their employer, ar entidement, ot a reward. In other countries,
*d
learning oPPomunides.
Chapar 1
4.
compensadon are (1) e{ficiency in performance and qualiry- satThe srraregic objecdves of
and conqglling cq$!s, (2) fairness, and (3) compliance
irfring .ur-ro*ers and stockholders,
wirh laws and reguladoru'
cornpetitiveTh. fou, strategic policies in rhe pay model are internd alignment, ecternal
associated
techniques
structure
The
internal
management.
and
n.rr, .*ptoy.. conuibutions,
pay
suucture
The
and
evaluarionicenification'
job
descriptions,
analysis,
are
*i,n Aij"*."r
are market definitions, surveys' and pay policy
cornpedtiveness
wich
associated
techniqies
are senioriry-based,
lin.r. th. incentive program techniques associated with contribudons
and merit guidelines. The evaluation techniques associared witi man-
o.rfor**..-based,
Key Terms
allowances
comPenSation
cost-of-living
adjustment
external comPetitiveness
total rewards
internal alignment
merit increase
relational returns
wage
work/life programs
salary
Review Questions
1, How do differing perspectives affect our views of compensation?
2. How does the pay model help organize one's thinking about compensation?
3, What can a pay system do for an organization? For an employee? Are these mutualy
exclusive?
2.
allthe forms of pay you receive from work. Compare to someone else's list. Explain any
differences.
3,
What is the "network of returns" upon your completion of the program at your curre.':
institution? Do you think these are achievable? What are the some of the things you cz.,'
offer your employer?
4.
Answer the two questions in this chapter's Conclusion, above (Why do it this way? Sc
what?), for any study or busines article that tells you how to pay people. Such artides ca:
be found
l,{&i
15
r
l
r
I
F
F
F
:
Experiential Exercises
1.
Tfu Pq
Review.
Case
Inside lnternships
Many recent graduates work as interns as they begin to establish their careers. Career Eige
organization is a national not-for-profit service provider established in 1996' that arange
Ii
T
F
t
F
t
;
16
Chaper 1
77n Pcy
Ltdd
paid internships by partnering with leading Canadian host employers including major
banks, telecommunications and financial firms, and public-sector employers including
major bank, telecommunications and financial firms and public sestor employees like local and
provincial governments. The first online job board in Canada (www,careeredge.ca), Career
Edge Organization, to date, has recorded over 11,000 internships, and continues to offer
paid internships through the Career Edge, Ability Edge, and Career Bridge paid internship
programs.
The Career Edge program provides meaningful entry-level work experience for recent Canadian
graduates. lt is designed to help recent graduates launch careers in their chosen field. For
employers, Career Edge offers access to a diverse, qualified talent pool via cost effective 4 to
12 month paid internships that does not affect headcount. lt is also a robust option for
onboarding recent graduates. For a very reasonable stipend, these interns can help with special
projects, add diversity to company operations, and cover temporary staffing shortages. lnterns
gain practical work experience, develop employability skills such as teamwork and criticalthinking, benefit from networking and receive a stipend.
Kim Burgess, a business analyst at Bell Systems & Technology, benefited tremendously from
Career Edge. She says, "After taking a year off work to return to school, reentering the workforce was difficult. Career Edge gave me the opportunity I needed to apply my new skill set and
learn within a working environment. Your internship is what you make of it and Career Edge
will provide exactly what you need to excell"
Questions
1.
2.
3.
What do employers receive from summer interns? What retums do recent graduates get
from these intemship opportunities?
Should interns be paid? lf so, how much? How would you recommend an employer decide
(accessed
February 22,20121.
ffi
with Connect.
Connect allows you to practise important concepts at your own pace and on your own schedule, with
2417 online access to an eBook, Practice Quizzes, Study Tools, and more.
t
F
t
t
il
LEARNING OUTCOMES
101
Explain why managers should tailor their pay systems to support the organi-
zation's strategy.
103
LO4 Contrast the "best fit" perspective on compensation with the "best
practices" perspective,
thcy.let
some managers adopt a compensadon sEategy by simply pafing mlket rates; rJrat is,
thdt
rhe marker d.ecide how rnuch to pay people. Unfortunately, a dose of realiry quickly reveals
employers cannot behave so simply.
I--I
IN STRATEGIES
In Exhibir 2.1, compensation scraregies at Google, Medtronic, and Merrill Lynch are compary{.
Google is a popular Inrernet serrch engine comPany. Medtronic is a pioneer in implantable
medic"l devices such as pacemakers and stents. Merrill Lynch, now part of Bank of America after
the meltdown in September 2008, is a financid services organization that advises companies and
clienrs around rhe world, All three are innovators in their indusry. Their decisions on the ffve
dimensions of compensarion strategy are both similar and different.
supporr rheir business sffaregy. All *rree emphasize outstanding employee performance and commitment. However, there are also major differences'
pay sraregy ro
Google positions itself as sdll being *re feisry start-uP populated by.nerds and. math whizmilemployees such g.n.iou, stock options that many of them have become
(Yes,
is a
there
competitors.
lionaires. Its beneftts
beyond the basics" compared to its
"r.''*"y
cash
downplays
lot.)
Google
Free lunch, a gym,
piano, and roller hockey in the parking
co*p.nr"don--(base^grandbon,rs.s), bur it does match its competirors on these pay forms.
zes.
il,rs
ii
it
t
I
I
I
f
f
18
Chaptcr
EXHIBIT
2.1 |
Objectives
2|
ffi
GOOGLE
MEDTRONIC
Emphasis on innovation
Focus on customers
Focus on customer
Commitment to cost
containment.
Recognize contributions
Attract and reward the best
.l
MERFULI TYNCH
fl
sonal lives
Recognize personal accomplishment and share success
and practices
fl
lnternal
Minimize hierarchy
Alignment
External
Competitiveness
Pay
fairly within ML
tegic value
stock
Employee
Recognize individual
Contributions
contributions
Unrivalled stock programs
Management
to know it
to busi-
fl
fl
Differentiate on bonuses
and stock
nderstandable, consistent
message
fi
fl
.t
!f,
f,t
fl
flI
xt
{t
W
$
che office holiday parry includes invited guescs whose lives have been prolonged thanks to Meduonic medicd devices. The yearly gathering brings alive to employees thar
what they are doing makes a real difference. So it is not surprising that Medcronic's pay strategy
At Medtronic,
seela employees "Toal \7ell Being'-programs designed to ensure that employees are "fully
presenr ar their work and in rheir personal lives" in order to focus on the customer. Addidondly
rhere is a srrong emphasis on performance-based pay that is based on individual, team, and organization accomplishmena. These programs offer Medtronic employees the opportunitf to earn
well above what drey would earn at competitors,
Merill Lynch pay objectives are straightforward to atuact, moti te, and retain rhe best talent.
Menill Lynch focuses on toral compensation, which indudes compecitive base pay, very aggressive
bonuses, and equdly aggressive stock awards based on each individualt accomplishmena. Pay for
performance is ,h. k y. Differences in toml pay for top vrsus poor performers are significant. ln good
yeas, roral compensation for top performers is hard rc bear In lean years, the bonuses and stock
awards significandy decrease, with greater reductions for poor performers than for top performers.
This aggressive pay-for-performance culrure at Merrill Lynch was traditionally seen as a
key factor in generating substandal wealth for bodr ics shareholders and rnany ofits ernployees.
-!l
:i4
ljl
fl
$
I
$
1ix
,d
$
dt
-T'
Chapter
t9
iI
held vicw is rhat this aggressive approach led rc too -,t;[ 65[-plrint and
However, a widely
by managers, and consequently the economic meltdown in late 2008.
behaviours
u".r663l
are in very diffcrent businesses servi.ng different cusro-ots, and
companies
threc
These
So
fre differenccs in their pay srategies may trot bc surprising. Pay
elenr
different
ernploying
r-ong
companies compedng for the sarne talent and similer orstomers.l
di$er
also
can
,rr*.gi.r
I
II
I
pay to join a companl whosc srcck value was increasing exponentially.2 But when ics
srock quir performing so spcctaorlady, Microsoft shifted irc suategy to increase base and bonus ro
rhe 65rh percentile from the 45& percentile of competitors' pay. It still recained its suong emphalug eliminztsd its longstanding broad-based stock opdoa plan
s.is on stock-related compensatioa,
condnue to lead the marker.
Its
beoefiqs
gran$.
stock
of
in frvour
SAS Institute, the world's largest prirzEty owned software company, takes a very different
approach. .lc emphasizes ics wodr/lift prograos over cash compensation, and gives only limisgd
bonuses and no stock awards. SAS headquaners in Cary, Nonh Carolina, includes fue on-site
childcare centres' subsidized privare schools for "hildr* of employees, rwo doctors on site for fi,.e
medical care, plus recreation facilities.3 Vo*ing more than 35 hours per week is discounged
By removing as many of the frusuations and disuacrions of day-to-day life as possible, SAS, like
Medtronic, believes people will focus on workyfien thcy arc at work and wont burn out. Googlc
so far retains the excitement of a scart-up, Microsoft has morphed into "the new Boeing-a solid
place ro vsork for a great salary,"a and SAS emphasizes its worl:/life balance programs.
These examples illusuate rhe rariane in suarcgic penpeccives among companies in differenr industries (Google Medrronic, and Merrill Lynch) and even among companies in the same
industry (Google, Microsoft, and SAS).
less base
r_I
'
STHATEGIC CHOICES
Strategrrefen to the fundamenul busines decisions that an organization has made in order to achieve
its strategic objectives. An organization defines its stratery thrcWh the tradeoft it makes in droosing
what (and what not) to do.6 Exhibit 2.2 relztcs these strategic choices to the quest for cornpetitive
advanage. At the corporate lwel, the fun&menral srategic choice k: Vhat ba:ines should ue be in?At
che business unit level, *re droice shifts to: f/o w do tu gain and suswin comp*itiae ad:uanage in this butizeniAt the fi:nctiond level, the suategic choice is: How should nul compensation help this brsiness gain
strategic perspective
afons onantcrnrttion
drisiots dut Mp the organizatiot gah md atsain
comFtitiwafunF/ge
,@
LO1
strategy
thefundamenal htsines
dxisbns an organization has
made to achieve i6 strategic
&jective,
sudr
uwhat
competltive advantage
ir**
a busin* pnctice or
that resuls in better peior-
I
I
I
t
;
20
Chaprer
EXHIBIT 2.2
2 | SFeg:
Tbc
foafu of DdAns
Strategic Choices
ffi
ffi
. What business
should we be in?
. How should
HR
.#
help us win?
compensation '+
help us win?
re
notions, That is, differences in a fum's strategy should be supponed by corresponding differences
resources strategy, including compensation. The underlying premise is that the
grearer the dignment, or.fit, between the organization and the compensation q/stem, the more
in its human
Chaper
Tailon
STRATEGY
lnnovator: lncrease
Product ComPlexitY
and Shorten Product Life
.o:,"
2|
BUSINESS RESPONSE
HR PROGRAM ALIGNMENT
COMPENSATION SYSTEMS
o Product Leadership
Shift to Mass
tustomization
Committed to Agile,
Risk-Taking, lnnovative
.'
People
Cycle Time
.
.
Reward lnnovation in
Products and Processes
Market-Based Pay
Flexible-Generic Job
Descriptions
. -Operational Excellence
Do More
with
Less
Pursue Cost-Effective
.
.
.
.
Solutions
Focus on Competitors'
Labour Costs
.
.
Deliver Solutions
Customers
Speed
to
Delight Customer,
Exieed Expictations
to Market
.
.
Customer Satisfaction
lncentives
Value of Job and Skiils
Based on Customer'
Contact
ffi
on cosr, whereas pmspecturt are more focused oo innsvadon, new marke6, and so fonh. These
are known is generic ttratqt fnmauozk Conventiond wisdom would b that competing on cosl
requires lower compensation, whereas compecing tirough ianovation is likely to be more successfi.rl
with high-powered incentive or pay for performance progra-ms. Most firms, however, do not have
generic strategies. Instead, they tend to have aspects of cost and imovation, Lil<ewise, compensarion
suategies do not necessarily line up neady witlr generic business saategies, Southwest Airlines rely
heavily on cosr leadership in their stratcgies, but pay their employees well above market (e.g., using
stock and profit-sharing plans) when fum perforuunce is suong. SAS follows a customer and innovarion suateg)', but uses litde in the way of pay for performance. Thesc generic business stratery and
pay strategy ideas provide a starting point for organization to fashion its orrrn unique way of adding
value and gaining competitive advantage duough aligniog its business suategywith ia pay strategr.
A dassic
emphasis on internal alignment
(e.g., well-developed job evaluation plan, clear hierarchy for decision making worky'life balance
benefits, policy of no layoffs) had served it well during the decades when the company dorninated
the marker for high-profir, mainframe computers. But it did not provide flexibiliry to adapt to
compeddve changes in rhe new centurf A redesigned IBM now focuses on the high-growth,
high-value segmenr of rhe IT induitry and offers a broad mix of businesses and capabilities that
provide business insighr and solution for its dients. A new business strategy requires a new com'pensarion suaregy. At IBM, rhis meant streamlining the organization by curting layers of rnanagemnr, redesigning jobs to build in more fleribiliry, increasing incentive pay to more suongly
differentiate on performancq, and keeping a constant eye on costs, IBM changed ie pay strategy
ft
also follows thar when business suategies change, pay strategy should change too.
IBMI
21
Chaptcr
22
Support
HR Strategy
it
As discusse4
business $:rate6r.
,6@
decision-making responsibililies.
Consider alignment beween compensation and other aspects of HR at SAS, Rather than
being sold in a one-time $ansaction, SAS's softvvare is licensed, This is part of a business strategy
bywhich SAS gers ongoing and substantial feedback from customers regarding how produce can
be continually improved and also regarding what new products custotners would like, To suppoft rhis long-term customer reladonship, SAS seeks to have low employee turnoyer. Im heavy
emphaiis on benefits in compensation helps to reain employees. SAS also gets many job applicarions, which allows it to be very selective in its hiring. The deemphasis on pay for indMdual
performance reduces the risk that competition among employees will undermine this objecdve.
Hence, alignment of an organizationt cornpensation stratery and ia HR strategy are central to
successful. business strategy
r-I
,@
ecicution'
The competitive advanrage of \il7hole Foods, inuoduced in the previous chapter, is apparent with
the ftrst visit to one of its grocery stores, described as "a mouth-watering fadvaj of colors, srnells,
and textures; an homage to the appetite."lO !flhat surted out in 7978 as a small heilth food store
in Atsdn, Texas, has, through straregic decisions, grown to becorne the worldt leading natural
and organic foods supermarkec Along the way, the company has designed a total comPensation
sysrem ro support the company's phenomenal growth (from 10,000 team mes.rbers or enlployees
and $900 million in sales in 1996 to over 64,000 team members and sales of over 10 billion in
2011) while remaining uue to the foundert vision'
Using the pay model discussed in the previous chapter, the following is an analysis of the five
suategic compensation decisions facing Whole Foods managers:
1.
Objeaiues: How should compensadon support the business suateg/ and be adaptive to
the cultural and regulatory pressures in a global environment? fWhole Foods: increase
shareholder value through proffts and growth;,go to extraordinary lengds to satisfr and
delighr customers; seek and engage employees who are going rc help the company make
money--{very new hire must win a two-thirds vote from team members beforc being given
Z.
'
3.
a permanent position.)
Interzal alignment: How differendy should the different types and levels of skills and work
be paid wi*rin the organization? (Whole Foods: store operations are organized around eight
ro ten self-managed tearns; egalitarian, shared-fate philosophy means that executive salaries
do not exceed 14 times the everage pay of full-time employees; all full-time employees
Sualify for stock opdons; nd 94 percent of the companyt options go to non-execudve
emPloj'ees')
competitiveness: How should total compensation be positioned aginst competitors?
($fh.ole Foods: offer a unique deal compared to competitors.) \Vhat forms of compensadon
should be used? (!7'hole Foods: provide heahl insurance for all full-time employees and
20 hours of paid dme per year to do volunteer worlc,)
Exirnal
:
Chapter
2|
on individual and"/or team perfori, o"experience and,/or condnuous learning on improved skills, on changes in cost of
^in
(e.g., housing, uansportation, hedth services), and/or on each busiliuirr*, o1 p.tronal needs
(Whole Foods: a shared fate-every four weeks, the performance
ness-unirt performance?
in terms of revenue per hour worked, which direcdy affects what
measured
is
of each ream
why sraff:rl are given a say in who gets hired-<o-woricers
reason
is
one
This
they ger paid.
Should pay increases be based
Emrloyec conrtbations:
*rn,-ro-.ot.
together,
These decisions, taken
strateg/'
F
:
ri
L(}2
drem is complex. Tbial and error, orperience, and insight play majql
,.3teps are simple, executing
.,It
ii
i,i
i,r,
F
F
F
T
AII organizatioru that pay people have a compensatiotr stratery. Some may have written, or state4
cbmplnsarion suaregies for all to see and understand. Othe5s may rrot even realize they have a
.omp.ns.rion strategy, daiming that "'We do whatever it m-kes." Their compensadon suategy
.-.rgo from the pay decisions they have made. Unstated compensacion suategy is inferred
from-.o*pensation practices.ll The point is that managers in all organizations make the frvc
suatcgic decisions discussed earlier. Some do it ia a rational, plalned walt; others do it more
.haotically-as ad hoc responses to pressures from t.he economic, sociopolidcel, and re.gulatory
conrexr in which rhe organization operates. But in any organization that pays people, there is a
r'
23
\Business Strategy and Competitive Dynamics-Understand the Business This ffnt step
includes an undersnnding of *re speciffc industry in which the organizadon operates and how it
ilans to compete. To cope with turbulent, compedtive dynamics, fo**g on factors in the business environment (i.e., changing custoirer needs, cornpetitors' actions, changing labour market
'lfhat
be part
strategies
to
different
business
t
I
24
EXHIBIT
Chapter
2 | Smry: Tb Toulitl
of &cinorc
Stnategy
I
I
t
I
l
t
I
;lti;:,
: r:,:,,i.::,:,,';,i'1lr.jillr'l:.:
i{ij
2.3)-fu
aheady been
discussed. But realiry is more complex and chaotic. Organizadons ale not necessarily innovators,
cost cutters, or customer-cenued. Instead, th.y iue some of each, and more. So the iational,
planned, and orderly image conveyed in Exhib-it 2.3 does not adequately capnrre the turbulent
13
bompetitive
performance approach, or
it
can tel<e the lead and be a catalyst for change. The pay strategy is
.t'
Chaprer
2|
-r.. nardally influenced by how well ir fia wid o&er HR qFcms ia dre organization. A highly
Ilr";1,rraand confidential pay syst - courolled h " f.. people in a corporate unit wi! ncg
nexibfg oPetr orBanizadon-'Whatever rhe role, compensadon is
approach'r6
pay rystem reflecc the nlucs th't gurde an employert behaviour and underrreacment of employees. In many orgaoizadons, core values guide employer' behaviours and
iie
in dte pay qrstems. The pay systern mirron the companyt i-age and reputation.
reflected
are
.Exhibic 2.5 shows Medronic! vdues. The fi.fth rralue recognizes employees'wonh by fostering
Gultulefllalues A
ir
jur.
I
I
tl
;
;
Context
Contact refers to a wide range offactors, including legal and reguqhonging workforce drnographics, orpectations, and so
differences,
latory requiiements, cultural
is very people-intensive. Consequendy, \fhole Foods
its
business
Foods,
on. In thi case of lfhole
25
essen-
tial. So &om a strategic perspefiive, managers of compensation may try to shape the sociopoliticd
environrnent as well as be shaped by ir
Employee Prelerences The simple fact that employees differ is too easily overlooked in
formulating a compensarion strategy. Individual employees join the organization, malce investmenr decisions, interact with customers, design new products, assemble componenc, and so on.
EXHIBIT
2,5
MEDTRONIC VALUES
30 years ago, our mission statement gives purpose
t
t
t
t
t
t
;
3.
.4.
5.
ry
;
:
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
2.6
Chagter
PeY
qtste1s is how
ro becer o.i"fy ioaiuiaual needs and preferences. Offering more choice is one approach- Older,
highly paid *ork o may wish ro defer to(es by puning their pay into retirement funds, wherea5
y"""g.. employees may have high cash needs to buy a house, support a &mily, or ftnance an
Ldrr."tioo. Durl-."r.., couples who have healthcap coverage in bodr workplaces may prefer to
use rlore of rheir combined pay fot child care, automobile insurance, financid counselling, or
other benefits such as flexible schedules. Employees who have young children or dependent parents may desire dependent care .overage.2o
beneftm
imiste-it
are
is a source
SoLe studies have found tfiat employees do not always choose well. They do not always
understand the alternadves, and roo many choices simply confuse them. Thus the value added
by offering choices and sadsfring preferences may be offset by the expense of communicating
and simply confusing people.2l In addition to possibly confusing employees, offering too many
choiceis would also be a challenge to design and manage'
Union Preferences Pay strategies also need to be adapted m the nature of the union-management relationship.z2 Union influence on pay systems in Canadaremains significant. In2007,
unionized worL.o at Loblaws in Ontario approved pay cuts for one-third of their members
cmployees represented by the
in order to remain competitivc with \ilalmart.3 Bombardier
'W'orkers
recendy negodated a flexible
Aerospace
and
of
Machinists
Association
International
forms of pay (e.g., retirement
diffcrent
for
preferences
Uoion
members.z4
their
plan
for
beneffts
and healthcate plans) and their concern widr job securiry also affect Pa)t stratery. For orample,
in the last ,ouod of ,r"gotiations bctween Air Canada and its 3,800 customer service staff(repto
resenred by *re CA\f)-in 2011, Air Canada was pushing to switch from a deffned benefia
vehemendy
of
course,
union
was,
The
ncw
hites.
a deftned tontribution pension plan for its
that
opposed to the change and the issue was sent to arbitration, The arbitrator ultimately nrled
from
their
benefit
of
pan
would
receive
hires
New
plan.
pension
Ai, C*"& h"d ,o o1",. hybrid
the existing deffned beneffts plan-under a reduced formula, and part from a defined contribution
contributed
^plan,Ir,t
rn"tionally, the role of unions in pay dctermination
In
Europe,
unions are major players in all strategic pay decisions. The point here is that union interests are
of the environsrental pressules that help shape compensation strategies.
'part Ir,
,rr*, assessing the compensadon implications of many factors-including the organithe competitive dynamics, its culure and vdues,. the sociopolitical
zationt business ,t
"Lry, preferences, and how it ffts with other HR slntems-is necessary to
conterft, employee/union
formulate a compensation strategy'
'
F'Chaprer
2|
Netflix is the world's leading lnternet subscription service for movies and W series. They
launched their operations in Canada in September 2010. With more than 27 million
streaming members in the United States, Canada, Latin America, the United Kingdom,
and lreland, their strategy is all about innovation, and their corporate culture is defined
as freedom and responsibility. The strategy requires a high-performance workforce, and
therefore they "hire adults and expect adult behaviour." The company has no formal
structure, no career paths, no health club, no ping-pong tables, no recognition program,
and no performance bonuses. Benefits are traditional.
When it comes to rewards, freedom and responsibility rule, The company considers the
opportunity to do challenging work to be the greatest reward. Compensation is very
generous (9fth percentile). Employees decide at the beginning of each year how to split
their compensation between cash and immediately vested stock options. Up to
15 percent of compensation can be used to buy deeply discounted, immediately vested
stock through the employee stock purchase plan.
Employees can take as much vacation time as they want as long as their manager and
team members agree. Turnover is considered a good thing because they dont want
employees to stay with the company unless they really whnt to be there.
The Netflix approach to total rewards is closely aligned with their strategy, and the
results have been excellent. The company has been rated the #1 Web site for customer
satisfaction five times and their stock price has held strong in the volatile high-tech
sector.
Sor"irces:
I
I
I
I
t-
t
T
t
;
poliry decisions) and rhe pay system (procedures for paying people) as well as the imporoF people's percepdons and behaviours is vitd to implementing a pay strategy. The results
(grand
Designing and implemencing a pay suareg)r that is a source of competitive advanuge is easier
Nor all compensation decisions are suaregic or a source of compedtive advantage. Three rests determine whether a pay strategy is a source of competitive advantage: (1) Is it
aligned? (2) Does it differentiate? and (3) Does ir add value?26
. T-tr
Step 3 is to implement the strategy .hto"gh the design and execution of the compcnsation sysrem. The compcnsation qrsrem cranslates stratesr into practice. Employees infer the underlying
strategy based on how they are treated by &eir employer duough compensadon qrutem.
tance
27
LO3
t
t
T
t
T
T
I
T
I
2A
phaptcr
Align
Alignment of the pay stratery includes three aspects: (1) alignment with the busines $raregrr,
(2) dignment octerndly wittr the economic and sociopolidcal conditions, and (3) alignment
internally with rtre overall HR qystern. Alignment iq. probably the easiest test to pass,
Differentiate
t
T
t
The pay suarery is woven into the fabric of the companyt overall HR stmtery. Copying one
or another dirnension of a strategy means ripping apart the overall apgroach and patching in a new
one. So irr a sense, the alignment test (weaving the fabric) helps ensure passing the differendation
test. Microsoft's use of stock awards for all employees, often wonh considerably rnore than base pay,
is difficult for its competicors to copy. The SAS work-family balance and Medtronic total-presenceat-the-workplace strategies are difficult ro copy. It might be reladvely ea,sy to copy part of what a
compedtor does (e.g., grant stoclc options to more employees, offer more choices in beneffts), but
the idea of a straregic perspecdve implies that it is the way the various programs ff.t together and
fit the organization; and that is difficult to copy. Simply copying others-blindly benchmarking
and following so-called best practices-amounts to trying merely to stay in tJre race, not ro win it.
T
T
T
t
T
t
t
t
T
I
Add Value
Organizations today look for the return they are getting from their incentives, benefiu, and even
base pay. Compensation often is a companyt largest controllable expense. Because consultants
and some researchers treat different forms of pay as investments, t-he task becomes how to come
up with ways ro calculate the return on those investments (ROI). But this is a diffrcult proposition. Costs are ruy to fit into a spreadsheet, bur any vdue created as a result of those costs is
difficult rc specifr, much less measure.Zs
Trying to measure an ROI for a compensation strategy implies tlat people are "human
capital," just like other factors of production. M*y people ffnd this view dehumanizing. They
argue that viewing pa)' as an investment with measurable returns diminishes the importance of
ueating people fairly.z9 Of t}re three tests of suatery-align, differentiate, add value-the last is
the rnost difficuh
arrd services, fust movers (innovators) have well-recognized
advanages that can offset the risls involved-high margins, capruring market share and rnindshare
(brand recognition).3o But it is not known whether such advantages accrue to innovators in totd
compensarion such as Microsoft (one of the first to offer very large stock options to all employees)
orAmerican Express (among the fust to offer flenible benefft programs in Canada) now that many
competitors are doing the.same thing. It is not known whether a compensation innovator atcracts
more and bener talent, induces talent to stay and contribute, or provides cost advantages. Studies
are needed to ffnd the answe$.
LO4
I_-I
premise of any strategic perspective is that if managers align pay decisions with
the organizariont stratery and values, are responsive to employees and union relations, and are
globdly competitive, the organization will be more likely to achieve competidve advantage.3l The
challenge is to design the "fit" with the environment, business suategy, and pay plan. The bener
the fit, the greater the competitive advanage.
Tie underlying
Chapter
2 | &raag:
Bur not everyone aSees. tn conErast to the notion of suaregic fit, some believe that
ll) a ser ofbesr pay practices exists and (2) thesg pracdces can be applied universally across
iiru"rionr. Rarher than a bcner fft between business strategy and compensation plans that
f.rr.t performancc, thgy say a set of best practices resula in bercer performance with
,rt.ta.
t
business strateg;r.32 The chdlenge here is to selecr from various recommended lists
l^or, *y
nthe" best practices. Research from the past few years is beginning to provide guidance
,hr,
"r.
on our "choices"'
:i
rr
.
.
.
,
,
Intazal aligztncnt Borh smaller and larger pay differences anong jobs inside an orgaoizadon can affect results. Smaller internal pay differences and larger internal pay differences can
both be a'besr" practice. !?hich one depends on the conterct, including the fft with lrrsinsss
srarery, other HR pracdces, and organizational culture.33
Extertal com?titioenest: Paying higher than the avere paid by competitors ca-a aftct
results. Is higher compedtive pay a "best" practice? Again, it depends on tte conterc.x
Ern?lEee conrtbutions: Performance-based pay can affect results. Are performance incentires
a "best" pracdce? Once again ir depends on the contoct.35
Managtng compmsation: Rather than focusing on only one dimension of the pay stffcgf,
such as pay for performance or internal pay differences, dl dimensions necd to be considcred
HR
HR
So speciffc pay practices appear to be more beneficial in some @ntetcr than othen,s and
"best pracdces versus best ftt" does not appear to be a useful way to frame the quesdon. A morc
useful question ls: Vhat pmctices pay of best undcr uhat condirtozri Much of the rest of this book
is devoted
t
I
I
together,36
approach.3T
to this question.
Srudies have shown rhat performance-based pay and stock opdors grana may be orarnple of best
practices. However, some snrdies suggest tfiat performance-based pay worls best when the organization is performing well. This phenomenon is like a vimrous circle. As depicted in Exhibit 2.6,
with increasing profits or market share is able to pay larger incentives in rhe form
of bonuses and *ock awards. And paying these incentives fairly improves employee anitudes
'1, and
work behaviours, which in turn improves their performance and ulrimately results in bemer
an organization
'.
I
;
There is consisrent rer.earch evidence rhat the following practices do maner to the organization's
organizational performance.3g The cirde gains upward mornenturn.40 Employees receive returns
that compensate for rhe risks they Blce. And they behave like owners, since they are sharing in
the organization's success.
It cannot have escaped your attention that circles can also ga.in momenrum going downward to become a vicious circle. As depiced in Exhibit 2.6, when organization performance
declines, say h a recessionary period, perforrnance-based pay plans do not pay oft drere are no
bonus'es, and the vdue of srcck dedines-rrith potentidly negacive effecrs on organizational
performance.4l Declining organizadonal performance increases the risla facing employeesrisks of demotions, wage cucs, and wen layoB. Unless the increased risks are offset by larger
retruns, the risk-return imbdance will reinforce declining employee acitudes and speed the
downward spiral.
t
I
I
t
t
I
t
-z*'. -
ur-
F
Chagter
2|
strategic perspective
strategy
Review Questions
1. Read a$anthe values statements
decide"?
2.
3.
What are the three tests used to determine whether a pay strategy is a source of competitive advantage? Discuss whether these three tests are difficult to piss. Can compensation
really be a source of competitive advantage?
Contrast the essential difference between the "best
perspectives
on comPensation.
4,
Experiential Exercises
1.
lnterview a compensation specialist about his or her organization's compensatjon stta'.egy, specifically the five isues--objectives, internal alignment, external competitive'
ness, employee contributions. and management. How does this organization compare
to Google? To Whole Foods? \rVhat business strategy does it seem to fit (i.e., cost cutter,
customer-centred,
2.
in
Set
up a debate over the following proposition: "Best practices' is superior to the 'best
fit"
3.
ten people about their total rewards preferences. What conclusions can you dralt
from the results?
4.
Set up a debate over the following proposition: Nonfinancial retums (great place to
work, opportunities to learn, job security and flexible work schedules) are more important than pay.
Survey
Case
Difficult to Copy?
One of the best ways to maintain strategic competitive advantage is to have a strategy tf.a: s
difficult for competitors to copy. The more the different aspect of a strategy are intere'lated
or interconnected, the more difficult it becomes for others to replicate. Consider the compejration strategy at Netflix. discussed in the .Net Worth feature in this chapter. On the face of L
this strategy look easy to copy (or at least to articulate). But determining which corrpensatoc
strategy best fits an organization's business strategy and culture as well as the exten':al cne5sures it faces may make the strategy more difficult to imitate. lt is the relaionship, the fiC the
way a pay system works with other aspects of the organization, that makes h difficuh to lrritate
and adds ,value. lt is not the techniques themselves, but their interrelationshlps that make a
I
I
KeY Terms
competitive advantage
:il
t
I
I
l
f
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
32
Chaptu
t
t
t
t
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
2I
Strdr,:
ruTaah,
"f
Mnons
Questions
1
.2,
Spend iome time looking at the website for Netf lix. What can you infer about the business
strategy and the organizational culture? 'l
pressures
3.
After you have a sense of what Netflix is like decide whether you think its compensation
strategy fits its business strategy, organizational culture, and external pressures.
4.
t
I
I
t
IL
ffi
with connect.
to practise important concepts at your own pace and on your own schedule, with
24t7 online access to an eBook, Practice Quizzes, Study Tools, and more.
Connect alloWs you
r
r
I
r
T
t
I
I
r
It
I
T
T
t
t
T
r
Nothing is routine at a CSl crime scene. And nothing is routine during the creation of the hit
TV series, Every yeaL nine writers struggle to come up with a plot for the season finale that
crery and production crew. ln addition to the writers and actors, jobs on the series include
director of photography, editor; story editor;'executive story editor; gaffers, and special-effecS
makeup (severed heads and other body parts).
What determines the pay for all the different types of work involved in creating C5l?
Executive story editors get paid more than editors. How much more? Does it matter? Can an
editor be promoted to the executive story editor for this or some other series? Writers can
become
tors become producers? ls the editor paid more than the stunt coordinator or the gaffer? And
. cratic burdens
examined within the framework of the pay model introduced in Chapter 1 and shown again
Chaprer
3|
Dcfning
InErul
37
LO1
1,,
Ab"wt
"-*i.o
i;, i":r"rJl eqniry), our
intemal alignment
(inremal eguity)
fie rdatfudrix bet*een
tln joixwithh a
ogan:zathn
'rele
;;r;.
objecdves'
,.
ioar toward organization
: r:--''
job
a
structure for the engineering and scientiffc work at an engineering
shows
3.-1
Exhibir
by
rnmDA'v. The suucture indudes six levels that range from entqT to consultant, as evidenced
six
levels
the
much
to
pay
how
ofworlc
Deciding
level
J. Ja"jonrtrips among rhe ddes for each
,r'GD
pay shrcture
the aray of pay ratrs fot dif-
ferent
in pay
belwftn the
levels,
nine
these differences
ffeate
th sfructure
Engineer
Limited use
supervised.
Senior Engineer
Full use of standard principles and concepts. Frovides solutions
eral supervision.
to
a variety
Systems Engineer
problems that
Aoplies extensive expertise as a generalist or specialist. Develops solutions.to complex
direction.
appreciable
performed
wjthout
Work
is
creativity.
and
ot
ins.niity
;J.il; th";;;;i;ft
i*lr.ir"t consi-derable latitud-e in dltermining technical objectives of assignment'
Advisor Engineer
Aoolies advanted principles, theories, and concepts. contributes to the development of new-prinsolutions thet are h.ighlv
Hi-;;;"J;;"pt!. w.it i t" unuruilry complei problems and provides
i;;;;"ti"";;Jiig"nious. Works undeiconsultative direction toward predetermined long-range
goals. AssignmenB are often self-initiated.
Consultant Engineer
Applies and/or develops
Exhibits an exceptional degree of ingenuity, creativity, and resourcefulness.
technolog-ies, scienfrfic principles, theories. and concepts. Develops information
ftiifrf"
"Ju"n."i iriilii"g 5";;,aaries of icnowiedse in a. given field..often acts independentlv to
il:t #;;;;il;
.tto.i"t"O with thE develdpment and inlplementation of operational
r;il;;"li;t
il;il;ln]
programs.
T
T
I
I
I
t
t
;
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
il
t
I
r
t
I
38
IT
!T
r
t
;
Smcatrr
Supports Workflow
refers to rhe process by which goods and services are created and deiivered to t]re customer. The suucture should support the efficient flow of that work and the design of *re organizadon.3 For example, drug companies traditionally basg t.he size of their sales force on the number of
physiciaru to b. .rll.d In p.i a"y and. the number 3f *o.Li.tg days per year. The drug manufac-
V'orlflow
workflow
process bywhich goods and
the
customer
rurer Merck decided to mlce a non-tra&tional approach to organizing sales and markedng. Mercki
analpis indicated that the abiliry of physicians to choose speci.ffc &ugs was being consuained by
governrnenr regulations and company health plan restrictions r-hat conuol access to products for
their members. Vith physicians no longer the sole decision makers, Merck created sales teams
consisting ofaccount execurives, client representatives, and medical information scientists to serve
a broader clienrele ofinsurance companies and physicians. A cross-functional team responsible for
a distincr geographic area (rather than a list ofphysician-clients) provides a relationship-building
approach ro selling products. Rather than handing out free samples, the Merck teams got to
know rhe clienr and provided them witl up-to-date information about trends and research.
. They became a source of knowledge useful to the physicians and the insurance companies. The
teams keep cliena apprised of regulations and cover drugs for a wider range of medical conditions.
One rcam even uanslared brochures that explain a coutse of reatment into Chinese, Russian, and
Spanish for a physician whose patients induded non-English-speaking immigrants. (Of course, the
,..o-*.ttd.J ueaunenr did include Merck producrs.) Suci a response would have been beyond
the resources of a single sdes representative under Merckt old approach.
To suppon rhese new work teams, Merck designed a new compensadon structure. Pay differences binve.n account execulives, customer representatives, and medical information scientists
who served on the same rams \Mere a major issue-just as tJrey had been for dre vingrard owner
described in the parable, and just as they are for the engineers'
r
t
t
t
T
thc
,#@
LO2
Motivates Behaviour
Internal job and pay suuctures influence employees' behaviour by providing pay increases for
promotions, more challenging work, and.greater responsibility u employees move uP in the job
5ru*.. The strucrure should make clear the reladonships between each job and rhe otganiza'
tioni objecdves. The abiliry for an employee to see the linkage berween what he or she does and
*re organizationt suategic goals is often called line-of-sight. Ernployees should be able to "see" or
,rnd.rJtand links berween their work, the work of ochers, and the organizationt objectives. For
example, sales representatives can clearly see how their work is helping to achieve a suategic goal
of sales growth. e"a *. sffucrure needs to be fair to employees. The vineyard ownert internal
,*,ro1,rJ might have been aligned with his business strategy, but the employee dissadsfaction
raises concerns about its fairness to employees.
I-
An internal pay srrucrure !s deffned by (1) the number of Inek of work, (2) the pay dffirentiah
berween the levels, and (3) rhe criteia used to determine those lEvels and differentials. These are
the faccors that a manager may varlz ro design a structure that supports ttre workflow and directs
employee behaviours toward objectives.
Levels
One feature of any pay srrucrure is its hierarchicd nature:the number oF levels and reponing
relationships, Because pay srructures rypically reflect the flow of work in the organizadon, some
iue more hierarchical wiih multiple levils and others are compressed with few levels.a As noted
earlier, in comparison to the engineering companyi six levels for a single job group (Exhibit 3.1)'
a healthcare .o*p*y uses five broad levels, described in Exhibit 3.2, to cover all professional
and execudve work,
;
Chaprer3 | Dfining Intemal Al@mnt
BAND
Associate
professional
Lead professional
Senior Professional
GE
Executive
NATURE OFWORK
f,1"l"Hl|;trofignasement
Source: GE Healthcare'
Differentials
The pay difFerences benveen levels are referred to as diffetentials. If an organization has a compensarion budget of a ser amount to disribute among in employees, there are a number of wap
lo do ro. It can divide the budger by rhe number ofemployees, giving everyone the same amount.
But few organizadons in the world are so egalitarian, and, in most, pay rnries among ernployees.
\?'ork that requires more human capitd--knowledge, skills, and/or abilides-that is performed under less desirable working conditions, and./or whose results are more valued is usually
paid more than work with lesser requirements.S Exhibit 3.3 shows the differentials amached rc dre
engineering company's pay sffucnue. One inrention of these djfferenrials is to motivate people to
higher-prying le.vel'
content and work rralue are the most cornrnou bases for determining internd structures.
Content refers to dre work performed in a job and how it gets don (us[s, behaviours, knowledge
required,
and so on). Value referc to the worth of the worh its relative consibution to the organi;
zation objectives. A strucrule based on content typically ranks jobs on the basis ofskills required,
complexity of tasks, and/or responsibiliry. By contrast, a strucnre based on the vdue of the work
focuses on rhe relative contribution of the skills, tasks, and responsibilides of a job to the orgarrizationt goals. Although rhe resuldng suuctures rnay be the same, there are imporrant differences.
]n addition ro induding relative conuibudon, value may also indude ercternal market pressures
(such as skills shonages). Or value rnay include rates that have been agreed upon tluough collective
bargaining or even legislation (e.g., minimum wage). Job vdues across all organizations in
i
Cuba
are set by a governmenr agency. The universal $rucrure dictates 8 Ievels for industrial work
'
. ers, 16 levels for rechnicd and engineering workers, znd26levels for governrnent employees.
'
39
Ur. value reflects the vdue of goods of services an employee produces in a job. F;cchange
value is whatever wage the employer and employee agree on for a job. Jobs such as software
engineer mighc have rhe same use value but different exchange vdues if, for example,'one job is
located in Bangalore and the other in New York,
Job- and Percon-Based Structures A job-baied *ructareLools ar work sensslrs-gaslc, behaviours, responsibilities. Aperson-based ttruct ffe shifts the focus to the employee: rhe shilk, hnowledge, or competencia the employee possesses, whether or not chey are used on the panicular job the
employee is doing. The engineering srrucrure (Exhibit 3.1) uses che work perforned as the criterion. The heakhcare suucnre (Exhibir 3.2) uscs the competencies required at each level of work.
differentials
pay
job
diffuencu betvtren
levels
T
T
T
T
T
t
T
t
T
T
T
195,000
185,000
s't82.4s6
Consultant
75,000
Engineer
55,000
155,000
145,000
$140.3s1
Advisor
135,000
g(!
E
o
B
o
Engineer
a)
28% Pg
o
.Cl
11s,000
$109.649
Lead
J4
Engineer
.g
co
26% o
95,o0o
$87.023
Systems
85,000
Engineer
75,000
$70.180
Senior
Engineer
55,000
$-58.000
45,000
co
12s,000
55,000
J4
Engineer
Chaptcr
*a
1",
3|
INTERIUAL
Loa
STRUCTUHES?
structures are
The maior organizadon facors-borh externd and internal-thar shape incernal
facors might better be represented as a web, with all factors convariorx
The
3.4.
f*ttiLir
i"
Jfr"*"
No single theory
n.."a *a inreracdng, Fxacdy how these facors interact is not wdl understood.
factors.
competing
cenain
facors;
others
omit
emphasize
for all factors. Some rheories
.**"
41
J
J
ii
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
)
)
.-
I
I
I
I
42
Economic
Pressures
'i
Adam Smith was ar early advocate of lecdng economic marlcet forces influence pay srructures.
Smith ascribed to human resources both an exchange value and a use value. Exchange value is
whatever wage the ernployer and the employec agreepn. Use value reflects rhe value of the goods
or services labour produces. New technologies associaied with rhe Indusuial Revolution increased
the use value of labour virithout a corresponding increase in exchange ra.lue.
Karl Marx accused capimlistic economic s)rstems of basing pay structures oq gxchange value.6
He said that employers unfairly pocketed the surplus value creared by rhe difference berween
what owners were willing to pay workers and what owners earned from workers' efforts. He urged
workers to overthrow capitalistic systems in order to reap the benefits of their labour and become
owners themselves. In solne sense, broad-based stock ownership by employees is following Marxt
suggestion that employees become owners.
marginal productivity
theory
the theory that unless an
employeean produce
something of value from
to
hire that
enployee
In the face of rising wages in the last half of the 19th century, new theories began to examine
the demand for labour. Marginal productivity theory says that employers do in fact pay use
vdue.7 Unless an employee can produce a value equal to the value received in wages, it will nor be
wordrwhile for *re employer to hire that worker. Pay d.lfferences among the job levels reflec differences in use vdue associated with different jobs. One job is paid more or less dran another because
of differences in reladve produ$iviry of the job and/or differences in how much a consumer values
the output, Hence, differences in productivity provide a rationale for t.he internal pay structtue.
In addidon to supply and demand for labour, supply and demand for producu and services
aiso affecs internal suuclrues. Rapid, often rurbulent changes, in eirher compecirors' producs
and/or services (as in the rise of the Incernet for making purchases) or in cusromers' rastes (as in
the populariry of fuel-efficient vehicles) means organizacions must be able to redesign workflow
and employees must condnuously learn new skills. fiubulent, unpredictable ocernal conditions
require pay srructules that support agile organizarions and flexible people.8 For ocample, jobs
requiring concinuous learning may be paid more than others, as thqf are so important for *re
achievcment of scrategic goals.
,@
In Canada, human rights legislation forbids pay systems that discriminate on the basis of gender,
race, religion, serual orienation, national origin, arrd many ottrer grounds. Therefore, a benefit
plan that provides beneftts only to males over the age of35 is illegal. Pay equity acm require "equal
pay for work of egud value," in male- and female-dominated jobs based on a job evaluation process tlat considers the skill, effort, responsibiiity, and working conditions requir.ed for the jobs.
For example, male-dominated police jobs and female-doririnated nursing jobs have often been
found to require egual skill, effon, responsibility, and working conditions, and the nurses pay
has been increased to dre same level a.1 that of police officers. An ioternal $rucrue may contai[
any number of levels, with differentials of any size, as long as the criteria for sening them do not
include gender, race, religion, or national origin.
Much pay-related legislation attemprs to regulate economic forces to achieve social welfare
objectives. The most obvious place to affect an internd sffucnrre is at the minimums (minimum
wage legislation) and maximums (special reporting requiremenc for executive pay). But legislation also aims at the differendds. Most countries have various legal standards regulating pay structures. '$Thatever thqz are, organizations operating
within
External Stakeholders
Unions, stockholders, and even political groups have a stake in establishing internal pay structures.
Unions are the most obvious case. Most unions seek smaller pay diffcrenccs among jobs as well as
senioriry-based promotions in order to promoti solidariry among members. At a minimum, unions
seek to ensure that the interests of their members are well represented in decisions about strucrures.
t.-
Chapra
3 | Dfining InteraalAlignmnt
43
t
t
;
pay artencion to execudve pay. The linkage (or iack rhereof) between execStockholders also
'Western
performance has come under incrasi.ng public scuEiny as
organizaion
tive oAy
nd
have faced ongoing economic problems in recent years. Boards of direcrors have been
reduce executive pay when suategic outcomes ale not being achieved, and panicuro
l..rr,rr.d
tlrrl'
rrrh.n profits have not materielized. Execudvc pay reduccions ar Molson Coon in 2010 are
in che 'Net W'onh box'
.r"";i*
fr"nf.a
F
F
T
Culrure is the shared norms and values that a group of people share in cornmon. Such shared
judgment of whar size of pay di-fferenriel is fi.ir. In ancient
,oindr.r, within a society may forrn a
:ue
strongest when dre richest earned a maximum of four
socieries
Greece, Plato dedared that
a
favoured
five-times limit.
Aristode
pay.
dmes rhe lowest
Western Europe, ctre church endorsed a "just wage"
in
l4tl-cenrury
how
describe
Hisrorians
the exisdng class strucn[e in the sociery. The docthat
supported
of
wages
strucrure
a
docrrine,
chaos resulting from ttre death of one-third of
and
social
the
economic
to
end
effon
an
trine was
The
plague.
shonage
of workers thar resulted from r-he devastation
bubonic
from
populadon
rhe
to
bid
the
wages
for
surviving
craftspeople. By allowing the church
up
landholders
and
nobles
led
and royalry ro determine wages, market fories such as scarcity of skills were explicidy denied as
appropriate determinants of pay suuctures.
t
I
beer market by nearly one percentage point in 2010, and it remained the secondlargest brewer with about 40 percent market share. Coors Light was the top-selling
brand with 14 percent market sharg while Canadian was No. 3 with 8 percent the
brewer said
8.4 percent
$3.2s billion.
ln light of the decrease in profits, Molson Coors Brewing Co. executives took pay cuts
amid last year's slump in results, with chief executive Peter Swinburn's total remuneration slipping 18 percentto U5$7.76 million from $9.45 million. Swinburn's base salary
increased to $941,667 in 201 0 from $875,000 in 2009, and increased again to $1.07 million
total remuneration
decreased to
t
T
t
t
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
!I
I
tr
F
h
T
Parrl I
,6@
Intetnal
Alignnat Datmining dn
Structure
Even today culu:ral factors continue to shape pay sffucnues around dre world. Pay equiry
is a Canadian example in which advocates have been changing societal judgmena about what
constitutes a just wage. These judgmens change in response to pressure. For example, many
traditional Japanese employers emphasize senioriry in their internal pay structures. But pressures from global compedtors and an aging workforce have made age-based pay strucilres yery
expensive. Consequendy, some Japanese employers are shifting older employees ro lower-paying
business units, emphasizing perfornance, and downplaying senioriry.l0
Organization Strategy
The last chapter explained that organizatioh suatcgics influence internal pay suuctures. Different
business suategies may require different pay srucrures to support them. The basic belief of a
strategic perspective is that pay strucrures not aligned with the organization strategy may become
obstacles to the organizationt success. An empirical study of 449 organizatiors conduded thar
"compensation professionais can substantially improve the effecdveness of their pay programs by
focusing on aligning their reward philosophy, stratery arrd coinpensation policies, programs and
practices with their business stratery"ll 6. il
people
major influence on internal sffuctures.12 The suonger the link bemreen
these skills and o<perience and an organizadont strategic objective, dre more pay tJrese skills will
command. The engineering Etrucrure in Exhibit 3.1 results in p.pog consultant engiaeers more
tlan lead engineers or senior engineers, because the human capital ofconsultant engineers brings
a greater reflun to rhe company. It is more critical to the organization's success.
possess-is regarded
as a
in
Gchnology used
Overall HR Policies
The organizationt other human resources policies also influence pay structures. Most organizarions tie money to promotions to induce employees to apply for higherJevel positions. If
an organization has more levels, it can offer more promotions, but there may be smaller pay
Chapter
3 | Dfrning
Intenat Alignnuzt
beclreen levels. The belief is that more frequent promotions (even without signiffdjfferendals
offer a sense of.career Progress to employees.t5
l^-o, p^y increases)
g"{,?d,refut
#-
uganbtian
endq$b
ard;larfu.E
lhoe
irfier-
entiofu
inrernd factors'
lEffig.5Tlllu"t
"tion
of
"n
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
t
t
-
45
I
T
r
*e Sruenn
de fairness of their pay through comparisons with the compensation paid orhwork relaied in some fashion to rheir own.l7 Accordingly, an impomanr factor influencing the internd pay strucrure is its acceptabiliry to.che employees involved.ls Employees rnake
muldple pay comparisoru to assess the fairncss of an internal pay strucrure. They compare their
pay to that for other jobs in the same internal job suucrure and ro the pay for rheir job in the
Employees judge
crs for
,#@
Sally is a soft-spoken, solid citizen and performer who quietly takes what she is
tlat rnight
given-which is
be
less
than she deserves. Hot shot Mark was hired at a ridiculous premium. Deirdre's pot was sweetened
when she threatened to quit. Tom's salary was enhanced following the successful completion of an
imporunt project-as a kind of thank you. Bart, who is a decent performer, hasn't gotten a raise in
two years because of his misfortune of working in an underachieving division. Lionel has been with
f,
t
!t
the company forever and has proiited through the cumulative effeqts oftime.2o
Tryo aspects of fairness are important: the procedures for determining rhe pay strucrure, called.
ju:tica and the results of those procedures-the pay strucrure itself-called dbtribujasrtce.
tbe
Procedurd justice refers to the process by which a decision is reached. Distributive
justice refers to the fairness of t.he decision outcome. Researchers report that employees'percepdons ofprocedural fairness significandy influence cheir acceprance ofdre results. Employees are
more willing to accept lower pay if they believe thar the way the decision was made was fair. The
research dso suggests riat pay procedures iue more likely to be perceived as fur if (1) rhey are
consisrently applied to all employees, (2) employees participate in the process (altlough recent
research suggesrs an exception when wages :ue very lo*),21 (3) appeals procedures are included,
and (4) the data used are accurate.
Appligd ro internd structures, proceduri justice addresses how design and administration
decisions are made and whether procedures are applied in a consistent manner. Distribudve justice addresses whether dre acrual pay differences among ernployees are acceptable.
procedural
procedural justice
faimess of a procas by whidr
a deciion is reached
distributive justice
faimss of a deciion
outcone
efforts to change them are resisted. Thus, pay structures established for organizational and economic reasons at an earlier time may be maintained for cultural or other political reasons. It may
take another economic jolt to overcome the cultural resistance. Then, new norms for emplciyee
acceptance are forrned around the new strucrure. This "change and congeal" process does not yet
support the continuous change occurring in todayi economy. New norms for employee acceptance probably will need to indude recognition that people must get used to constant cfrange,
even in internal pay reladonships.
The pay for airpon securiry screeners reladve to other airpon jobs illustrates the change
and congeal process. Prior to 9/11, airport screeners were paid minimum wage witJr no beneffts.
Today, wages are comparable to police and fire protection jobs. Employees in other airport jobs
had to revise their comparisons to the securiry jobs.z2
LO4
IT
Internally aligned pay structures support the way the work gets done, fft the organizationt business
tair to 'employees. Greater internd alignment-ftt-is more likdy to lead ro success.
Misdigned strucrures become obsades, They may motivate employee behaviour that is inconsisrent
!4.:
Chapter
J I Dfining IntemalAlignmmt
47
strateg)r. But whar does it mean to ffr or ailor rhe pay suucg111e ro be
wirh rhe organizadont
suaregic choices are involved: (1) how tailored ro organization design and.
Tho
aligned?
inrernally
structurc and (2) how to disqribute pay tluoughout rhe levels in the su!61|lre.
woldlow ro rnake the
short product t'esi8n-m-1a1ket cycle times. Companies ftke 3M need to be very agile, constantly
innovadng and adapting. The compedtive environment these organizations face iirurbulent and
unpredictable. The.ir engineers may work on several teams developing several producrs at dre same
time. 3Mt Pay system needs to accommodate this flexibiliry. Hence, they need a more flexible
pay suucrure, often called a loosely coupled structure, in order ro allow for rhe consunt change.
tailored structure
pay structure for well4efined
iobs with relatively smalt differences in pay
jM
pay structure fu
ttlat
are fles<iile, adaptabte anci
changing
the multiple levels rypically indude detailed descriptions of work done at that level and deli11eare
who is responsible forwhat. Hierarchic'l structures are consistentwith a belief in the motivadonal effects of frequent promotion. Hierarchies value rhe differences in individual employee
skills, responsibilities, and conrriburions to rhe organizarion.z3
STRUCTURE A
LAYERED
Chief
STRUCTURE B
DELAYERED
Engineer ,
Ctriet Engineer
Engineering Manager'
Consulting Engineer
't':
.:
.,
,'
Engineer
Consulting Engineer
Senior Engineer
''.'
Engrneer .
Engineer
Trainee
1'
Associate Engineer
"I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
t
f
48
Den
I I Intanal Aligmtzt
Dccmizhg dx S*act t
"
sibility and supervision are removed so that all employees at all levels become resporuible ior
broader range of tasls, but also have greater freedom to determine how best to accomplish what is
expected.of them. An egaliurian suucture implies a belief thar more equal tre"t*.r,t
improve
employee sadsfaction, supporr cooperarion, and therefore improve workers' performance.24
Stantec Inc., an Edmonton-based engineering consuldng company, includes the following
in irs compensation objectives:
*i[
Take a one leam Approach-Members of our senior management team are expected to work
together to contribute to the success of the Company as a whole. Our compensation program should
reward both individual and Company-wide achievement of objectives.
.
LO5
Accordingly, executives have lirde variance in thet pay; base salary for the highest-paid ffve executives ranged from $275,009 rc $386,366 in 2010.25
There are drawbacla to this approach. Equal treaunenr can resuh in more knowledgeable
. employees with more responsible jobs (stars) going unrecognized and uruewarded,
which may cause
them to leave the organization. They mayleave physically for anodrer job, or thry may simply slack
offor tune out and refixe to do anything not specifically required of tlem. Their change irl behaviour
will lower overall performance, So a case can be made 51 6ofl1 'gqlitarian and hierarchical suucgtues.
Exhibit 3.7 clariffes the differences between egalitarian and hierarchical strucnrres. Keep in
mind, though, the choice is not cithcr/or. Rather, the differences are a maner of degree, So levels
carr range from many to few; differentials can be large or small, and the criteria can be based on the
job, the person, or some combination of the rwo. The question to be resolved is: \Vhat size should
the pay differentials be benveen the adjacent enginceiing levels? Exhibit 3.8 shows that the differentials between engineeringjobs range from $10,500 (Engineer to Senior Engineer) to $42,000
($dvisor Engineer to Consultant). Both the :rmount and.rhe percenrages increase at each level,
I__I
tleir
wili look not only at r.he hsors in their drganization, such as workflow, what is fait, and how to
motivate employee behaviour, but dso look to theory and research for guidance. Bodr psychologisa and economists have something to tell us about the efiFects of rnrious srrucrlues.
EXHIBIT
3.7
E!r
Chaprcr
3 | Dfiniag InunalAlignc*
Pay Differentials
Dollars
(bonus + base)
Job
Consultant
$162,000
AdvisorEngineer
$120,000
Lead
Engineer
Senior
$73,000
Engineer
$58,500
Engineer
Percentage
rl
II
$+8,OOO
'1
II
IJ
$93,000
Engineer
Systems
Differential
Dollars
49
in private organizarions. Past research has shown that employees are often misinformed about
their relative standing in the pay structure.27 Thus, equity theory might suppon eirher egditarian or hicrarchical sructures, depending on the cornparisons and the accuracy of information
about them.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
50
Partl I
Internal
Aligwnat Dntubiry
dte Strudurt
play bercer in toumamens in which the prize differentials are sizable.2s Sorne research srp*
porrs rorunamenr rheorF. Raising the total prize money by $100,000 in the Professional Golf
Association rournament improved each playert score.29 And *re closer the players got to the top
prize, the more
&ply*g
tleir
scores improved.
these resule
presenr salary and his or her boss's salary, the harder the employee (and everyone else) will worlc.
Suppose that the engineering suucture contains ten advisor engineers at the second-to-the-top
$i20,000, and each compering for rwo consultant posirions, forwhich the
pay is $162,000. A tournamenr model says that if the consultanrs instead are paid $200,000,
everyone will work even harder. Rather than resenting the big bucks paid to the consultants,
lerrel, each making
engineers at all levels in the suucture will be motivated by the greater differential to work harder
to "wirf' prornotion to the next lwel.
But most work is not a round of gol4 nor does it lead to the company presidency. Vinually
all the research that supporrs hierarchical structures and tournament theory akes place in situations in which individud performance matters most (e.g., auto racing bowling, golf tournaments), or ar be$ in which the demand for cooperation among a small group of individuals is
relatively low (e.g., professors, stoclSrokers). In contrast, team spofts provide a sefting in which
both individual players' performance and the cooperative efforts of the entire team make a difference.30 Using eight years of data on majorJeague baseball, one study found that teams with
egditarian suucflnres (practically identical player salaries) did better than those witl hierarchical
srrucrures (very large differentials bewveen plafrs). In additiou to affecting team perFormance
(e.g., games won, gaie receipts, frandrise value, total income), internal suucnrres had a sizable
effect on players' individual performance (e.g., batting avcrages, errors, runs baaed in). It may
also be that the egdirarian pey sffucture reflec$ a more flecible, supportive organizational culturc
in.which players are given the raining and support they need.
.
.
.
suuco.:.res,
which are:
More hierarchical structures are related to greater performance when the workflow depends
more on individual contributors (e.g., consulting and law practices, surgical units, stockbrokers,
on perfor-
mance rather than seniority and when people have knowledge of the structure.
More egalitarian suucrurcs are related to grearcr performance when close collaboration and
sharing of knowledge is required (e,g,, fireffghting and rescue squads, manufacturing teams,
'
hod customer service staff, global software design rcams). The competition fostered in "winner take all" tournament hierarchies appears to have negadve effecs on performance when
:
the workflow and organization design require
the
odrer
strucnrre
on
organization
affected
by
internd
perforrnance
is
The impact of any
dimensions of rhe pay model pay Ievels (competitiveness), employee performance (conuibutions), and employee knowledge of the pay sffucture (management).
teamwork
t"
Chapter
5lt
-fl
Undertake training
lncre6se experience
Reduce turnover
E
'.
.
,
Beyond these points, much ;ggleins to be srudied, There is praccically no research on r.he
optimal size of the promotional increase or its effects on behaviours, satisfaction, or performance.
Nor is much known about wherher smaller, more frequent promotions are befter (or worse)
than fewer, larger, les frequent promodons. Perhaps informal expectations are developed at each
workplace. ("You can er.pec to be promoted here after about three years, and a 10 percent raisc
usually goes with it.") Lide is known about how these ru.les developed and what rhe origina.l logic
was. Buc they do rnat[er, Promodons sooner (or larer) tharr enpe*ed, accompanied by a larger (or
within the engineering company? To answer this question, it is necessary to understand how differenrials within the
career path support the business suategy aad worlflow, motivate engineers to conuibute to the
company's success, arrd are considered fair by the engiaeers. The ne<t several chaprcrs di5s'se hevv
to manage these internal stnrctures.
IT
GONSEOUENCES OF STRUCTURES
LO6
'Why
Efficiency
that an aligned pay strucilre can lead to better organizacion performance.32 If
ihe structure does not motivate employees to help achieve the organizationb objectives, then ir
is a candidate for redesign. lnternal pal strucilres irrply furure rewards. The size of the pay differential between the entry level and rhe highest level in the suucnrre may induce employees to
remain widr the organization, increase theiiexperience and training, cooperarc with co-workers,
and seek greater responsibiliry.33 Thus, rhe number of levels and tides in a career parh may be
rewarding beyond the pay aaached rc the tides. Microsoft added a "distinguished engineer" tide
to its strucnrre. The coruulting firm McKinsry and Company added an "associate parmer." Their
ruionalc was that cmployecs are morirrated by &eguent steps in the career ladder. These a.re new
tides and levels not yct reflected in the cxternal market.
Research shows
,@
I
I
I
I
PanI I IntcnalAlignnc*
52
MhE*Ssltan
Fairness
Vrirers have long agreed thar departures from an accepcable wage structure will result in higher
turnover, grier"ances, and diminished motivation.3a But that is where agrcement ends. Onc group
if fur (i.e., sizable) diffcrentials .betwecn iobs are not paid, individuals may harbour
ill will toward the employer, resist change, change einployment if possible, become depressed,
or "lack rhat zest and enthusiasm which makes for high efficiency and personal satisfacdon in
work.'35 Others, including labour unioru, arguc for small differendals, in the belief that more
egalitarian structures support team cooperation, high commitment to the organization, and
argues rhat
improved' performance.
Legal Compliance
decision, che design and management of intcrnal pay structures must comply
with thc regulations of the countries in which the organization operates. Although the research
on internal alignment is informative, there is sdll a lot *rat is not.known.'Sf'hat about tfie
As
,#@
appropriate numbcr of levels, thc size of the differentials, and the criteria to advance employees
,hro"Sh a strucrure? It is believed that the answers lie in undersunding the Ectors discussed in
rhis chapter: the organization's strategic intent, organization design and worldlow, human capital,
and the external condidons, regulations, and customs it faces. It is also bclicned that aligning the
pay structures to fit the organizadon and thc surrounding conditions is more likely to lead to
competitive advantage for the organization and a sense of frir trcatment for employees.
Gonclusion
This chapter discusses the strategic policy of internd alignment and how it affects employees,
managers, and employers. Internd alignment refers to the pay relationships-among jobs, skills,
within a single organization. The potential consequence$ of internd Pay struc*d
"omper.ncies
rures are vital to organizations and individuds. Recent research and ercperience offer guidance
concerning the design and management of internal Pay smcrures.
Pay sio.turo-rhe array of palz rates for different jobs within an organization-are deffned
by levels, differentials, and the criteria for determining these. Pay structures are shaped by socieal, economic, organizational, and other facors. Employees judge the hirness of pay strucrures
by comparing their pay to other jobs within the organization and to what competitors Payfor
pay differentids between jobs is a key test of an
lobs similar to theirs. Accepmnce by employees of
eguirable pay srrucrure. Pay structures rue part ofthe network ofreturns offered by organizations.
TLey offer career paths to higher-paying jobs and a sense ofachievement.
The goals of che entire comperuation system must be kept in mind when thinking about
internal p"y rttt-,*.r. Widespread orperience and, increasingly, research suPPort the belief that
differences'in internal p"y rtrrr"r,r..r, particularly employee career paths, influence people'i aaicudes and work behaviours,.and therefore the success oforganizations.
tl
1.
2.
Chapter Summary
Internal alignment refers to t}le pay relationships between jobs, skills, and competencies
wirhin a single organization. The relationships form a suucture rhat supports organizationd
srrarery, supporrs t.he worldlow, ald rnocivates ernployee behaviour toward organization
objectives. A pay structure is the array of ^pay rates for different work or skills'
The three types offactors that define how internal pay structrues are designed are (l) the
nurnber of levels of work, (2) rhe pay differentials between the levels, and (3) rhe criteria
used to determine these levels and differentials.
Chaptcr
The Fecors rhar shape inrcmal pay strucrures are: (1) external hctors such as economic pres(2) organizational factors
sur$ goverilnen.r policies, laws, and regulario_ns, and ctlture and
5f .i t "rt.gt, human capital, work design, and employee accePence.
Tle rwo snaregic choices involved in designing internd pay srruffures are: (1) how closely to
lok ghc paF srruauIe to organization design and worldlow (tailored or loosely coupled) and
(?) hwr ro di*ribute pay droughout the levels in the structure (egalimrian or hierarchical).
Thrc deoredcal approaches to determ.ioing which pay structure is best for an organization
arc equiry 6cory tournament rleory, and the institutional model' Equiry rheory focuses on
hcr employees compare their work, qrrrliff64gien5, and pay to those of orhers. Tournament
dcory suggcsrs dat the greater rhe differences beween salaries in the pay strucnrre, the
harder cmployees will work. Irudrurional theory suggests that organizations copy the "best
pracdces" of others.
nces
?ho. .o*.q,t
comPliance.
Key Terms
differentials
distributive justice
human caPital
marginal productivity
theory
pay structure
internal alignment
(internal equitY)
Review Questions
Why is internal alignment an important compenstion policy? What happens when a compensation policy is not intemally aligned?
Judging from your own experience, which factors shaped the internal pay structure at your
most recent employer? Provide examples that support your choice'
Would Researdr ln Motion, makers of the BlackBerry be better served by a tailored pay
gtructure or a loosely coupled pay stnrcture? Explain your arlswer.
Explain the consequences of internal alignment for competitive advantage, fairness to
employees. and legal comPliance.
Experiential Exercises
Look into any organizatiot{our university/college, workplace, or the grocery store
where you shop. Describe the flow of work. How is the job structure aligned with the
organization's business, the workffow and the organization objectives? How do you think
Itlustrate the internal labour market for faculty at your university/college, using Exhibit 3.5
as a guide.
53
II
II
J
J
J
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
54
the Structan
Case
The Orchestra
f"
Orchestras employ skilled and talented people, joined together as a team to create products
anfl services. Job descriptions for orchestras look simple: Play the music. Molins play violin
parts; trumpets play trumpet parts. The pay structure for a regional chamber orchestra is shown
'b-elbw.
The pay covers six full orchestra concerts, one Carolling by Candlelight event, three
Sunday Chamber Series Concerts, several Arts in Education elementary school concerts. two
engagements for a flute quartet, and one Ring in the Holidays brass even! as well as regularly
scheduled rehearsals.
Orchestra Compensation Schedule
INSTRUMENT
Concertmaster
Principal Bass and Conductor
Principal Viola
Principal Flute
Prlncipal Trumpet
Principal Cello
Principal Clarinet
Molin,
PAY
$5,790
$5,070
$5,036
$4,337
$4,233
$4181
i4,146
Trumpet
$s,e:e
Principal
$3,615
Oboe
Principal violin ll
Prirrcipal Horn
Keyboard I
Cello
Principal Percussion
Violin I
cello
Principal Bassoon
Violin I
Violin I
Violin I
Violin I
Violin ll
Violin ll
viola
Viola
oboe
Trombone
viola
Violin ll
Violin llA/iola
$s,+as
$3,390
$3,361
$3,228
$3,049
$2,899
$2,882
52,824
$2,685
$2,483
$2,483
j2,483
$2,483
iZ,qe3
$2,4s3
i2,212
$2,20G
i2,137
$2,033
$t,szs
$1,784
.E,-
Chapter
3 | Defning
latcrnal
Alignmnt
55
Questions
1.
Z.
Describe
job. or
person-based.
Discuss which factors may explain
it
the principal trumpet player earn more than the principal cellist and clarinetist, but less
than the principal viola and flute players? what explains these differences? How does
the relative supply versus demand for violinists compare to the supply versus demand for
trombonists?
3.
ffi*
to practise important concepts at your own pace and on your own schedule, with
to an eBook, Practice Quizzes, Study Tools, and more.
24f online
"..eis
with Connect.
I
I
tI
I
I
f-
I
I
I
LEARNING OUTCOMES
LOl
resources management.
LO3 Describe the information that must be collected for job analysis and explain
recent changes iri how this information is collected.
LO4
Discuss
105
Explain the pros and cons of job analysis and different ways to judge
job analysis.
Three people sit in front of dreir keyboards scanning their monitors. One is a sales representadve
in Montreal, checking fie progress of an order for four dozen smartphones from a retailer ir
Vancouver, who has just placed tlre four dozen into his shopping can on the companyk website.
A second person is an engineer, logging in to the project design sofrware for the next generation
of these phones. Colleagues in China working on the same projeo last night (day in China)
sent some suggestions for changes in the new design; tlre team in Canada will work qn the
project today and have their work waiting for their Chinese colleagues when they come in to
work in the morning. A third employee, in lreland, is using business sofrwa.re recently installed
worldwide to analyze the latest sa,les reports. In todayt workplace, people working for the same
company need no longer be down the hallway from one another. On-site or overseas, nerworks
and business software link them all. And ill these jobs are part of the organization's internal
structure.
If pay is to be based on work performed, some systematic method is needed to discover and
describl the differences and similarities among drese jobs-observation alone is not enough. Job
andysis is that method
E'
Chaprer4 | JobAnaSsit
57
ti":T.
::1
!:qt1.t:"f:t 1f:*
;il;;;;r.t*ination
II
ilil;j
.lJ J*.
i ffi.,o5.
lhe
lnternal Structure
Job-based
I
\ \
I
I
Person-based
/\
/\
/\
Skill
(Chapter 6)
ComPetermtus
(ChaPw
61
PURPOSE
f
f
I
Collect, summarize
work information
Job analysis
Job descriptions
(Chapter 4)
I
I
*
Determine what
to value
I
I
I
Assess value
I
I
I
Job evaluation:
classes or
compensable factors
(Chapter 5)
weighting
(Chapter 5)
Translate into
structure
T
J
tl
job
.:-b:
4.1 oudines m1pro.Tr, for constructing a work-related internal.
of pav' No,rnatt;r thlaryroach'
Pt?::::
,tfre
the people are doing and the expected outcomes;
**U. Job-based slrucrures look at the tasls
rhe
However, the underlying purpose of
at
person.
",
compecency-based structures iook
column
of
the. exhibit) relains,the.tT..Pt
(shown
left-hand
in
the
of rhe process
*rr,uu
Job-based structure
(Chapter 5)
'llt'll
t
t
58
LO1
job analysis
the qTstematic process ofcollecting information about the
nature of spxifrc jobs
l--I
Sfractw
Exhibir 4.2 shom how job analysis and the resulting job description are the first steps in the
process of creating an internal job structure. Each step is defined and rdated to designing the
strucnrre. Job andpis provides the underlying in{ormation for preparing job descriptioru and
evaluating jobs. The contenr ofthe job is idendffed via job analysis; this content serves as input
for describing and valuing work.
Exhibit 4.2 also lisa rhe major decisions in designing a job analysis: (1) \fhy are we colleeling job information? (2) \7hat information do we need? (3) How should we collec it? (4) \fho
should be involved? (5) How useful are the results?
,@
Potential uses for job analpis have been suggested for every major human resources function, The
qpc of job analpis data needed varies according to firnction. For enample, job analysis identiffes
the skills and experience required to perform the work, which clarifies hiring and promotion standards. Tbaining programs may be designed with job analysis data; jobs may be redesigned based
on such data. ln performance evaluation, both employees and supervisors look to the required
bchaviours and results expected in a job to help assess performance.
An internd structure based on job-related information provides both managers arrd employees wirh a work-related rationale for pay differences. Employees who understand this rationde
can bemer direct tfieir behaviour toward organization objectives. Job analysis dara also help managers defend thcir decisions when they are challenged.
In compensation, job
analysis has
ences in the content ofjobs and (2) it helps establish an internally fair and alignedjob strucrure.
If jobs have equal cortent, rhen in all lilcelihood, ,h. p"y established for them will be equd. If,
on the other hand, thc job content differs, then those differences, along with the market rates
paid by compctitors, are part of the rationale for paying jobs differendy.
The key issue for compcnsation decision rnakers is still to ensure that the daa collected serve
the purpose of rnaking decisions and arc bcceptable to the ernplopes involved. As the arrows in
Exhibit 4.2 indrczte, collecting job information is only an interim step, not an end in iaelfi
EXHIBIT
E'
4.2 |
JOB ANALYSIS
JOB DESCRIPTIONS
;
'
'
job as it is actually
,re
JOB EVALUATION
JOB STRUCTURE
Cornparison of
jobs within an
An oidering of jobs
on.the basis of
.their content or
relative value
.organization.
: : ..-
:performed
SOME MAJOR ISSUES IN JOB ANALYSIS
.
.
.
How
to colled information
-"
Chapter4 | JobAnalsit
LOz
4.3 summarizes some job analysis terms and their relationship ro one anorher. Job analycolleca information about speciftc tasks or behaviours. A group of tasla performed by
usually
sis
up a posidon. Idendcal positions make a job, and broadly similar jobs combine
one person makes
EyJrtbic
into
lob famlY'l
Latge organizadons, often the biggest users ofjob analysis dara, usually follow a srep-by-srep
job aaalysis. Snndard procedures, shown in Exhibir 4.4,
approach to conducting conventional
developing preliminary informadon, interviewing job holders and supervisors, and then
to create and verify job descripdons, The piccure rhat emerges from the
rhe"information
using
workPlace
where the division from one job m the nexr is clear, widr linle
stable
a
is
of
exhibit
jobs
follow a steady progression in a hierarchy ofincreuing responworkplace,
this
In
overiap.
sibiliry. The relationship berween jobs is dso clear, and so is what is required to qualify for promodon into a higherJevel job. Alchough some argue that such a uaditional, stable srructure is a
shrinking part of*re workplace landscape, such suuctures neverrireless persist, in varying degrees,
in many latge organlvations. Thus, this depiction of conventional job analysis provides a usefirl
naua.
EXHIBIT
4.3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f,
'-
L
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
60
eem;niry $c &racnn
STEP
THINGS TO REMEMBER OR DO
r.
.
1' Develop ' ' ' Review existing document in order to develop an initial ,,big picture,, familiarity
rrv with
uv'- the
i Pr"eliminaw job-its main ;issio;, iis malor outiei oi run.ii*l,
-"tiriiittrJri ;;ti;;;r.'""""or
liriirnution ' fJff;tff :*liminary list of duties which wili sertje as.a framework for conductins lplg
'l
'
^. ' '
' Make a note of major items that are unclear or ambiguous or that need to be clarifieij during
the data-gathering-process.
2' conduct
initial tour
of work site
the end-to-end
'
leneral conaitions-o?
p"*;;;;il;;f
t-ne
major duties.
*"*o';:",
describe.
'
Forcontinuity,.itisrecommended.thatthefirst-level supervisor-intervieweebedesignatedas
the guide for the job-site observations.
3' conduct e lt is recommended that the first.intervjew be conducted with the first-level supervisor who
is
to be. in a better position th;; ihel;b iliiln to provide ,; o;"rvi"* ;l the job
.' .:. ,lnt-i"*1,.
i?Tidered
; ,,' . . and
how
:1 '.
the
major
duties
fit
together.
:' ,
' l' , ', ' " I For scheduling purposes, it is recommended that no more than two interviews be conducted
. per day, each lasting no more than three hours.
. ,
.
on
' The interviewees are considered. subject-matter experts by virtue of the fact that they per'votes
selection of
form the job. (in the case of job
interuiewees the case 6f first-level supervisors).inculnbe;tsl; .iJi"ti.nrtur" t"i g;tti"il#jon'aon" 1in
.
2.
to be interviewed should represent the typical employee who is knowlthe trainee who is'just tearnins ihe iop"i oi ir,"oui#"naing
L!:,19.?,grot
memDer ot the work unit).
3. Whenever feasible, the interviewees should be selected with a view toward obtaining an
appropriate diversity mix.
'
dg:lll-?:yt
-,i ',t
,1,
,:r
,;,l',;.i 1';i,
r,,, .i:,1.,'
Chapw4 \ Jo6,{shil
a.Jpild
fu Erdibir 4.4 suggests,
T.lni,
funher_an"lfit.
l*
EXHIBIT
4.5
LO3
61
t
t
t
t
I
t
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,\
PutI I h*matAlignmnt:
62
t
I
I
I
I
Employee Data
Position Analysis
Qu6stionnaire (PAQ)
a struciJrcd job anafipis
I
I
I
Once we have specified the tasks and outcomes' we c;ul lotlk ai the lcinds of behaviours that
outcomes. F.xhibit 4.5 categorizes employee data as employee characteristics,
internal relationships, and o<ternd relarionships. Exhibit 4.7 shows how "Communications'
can be described with verbs (e.g., negotiating, persuading). The verbs chosen are related to the
employee characteristic being identiffed (e.g., bargaining skills, interpersonal skills). The rest of
d.. ,t"t.*"ot helps identifr whedrer the behaviour involves an internal or enternal relationship.
The excerpt in Exhibit 4.7 is from the Position Analysis Questionnaire @AQ), which
groups work informadon into seven basic factors: information iaput, mental proccsses, work
Ioap,rr, relationships with other Persons, job conto<t, other job characteristics, and general
dirriensions. Similarities and &ffercnces dmong jobs are described in terms of these seven factors,
rather than in rerms of specfic aspects unique to each job.3 The communications behaviour in
dris exhibit is part of the "relationships witl other persons" 6ctor.
The endre PAQconsists of 194 iterns. Its dwelopers claim that these items are sufficient to
znalyzeany job. Howwer, you can see from Exhibit 4.7 thar the reading level is quite high. Many
employees will need help to get through the whole thing.
^
Fio*.u., appealing it mighr be to rationalize job analysis as the foundation of all HR decisions, collectinj all thislnformation for so many difierent purposes is very enpensive. In addidon,
rhe resulting inlormation may be too generalized for any single purPose' is6h'ding compensadon.
If the information is to be used for multiple purposes, the analyst must be sure it is accurace
and suficient for each use. Trying to be all things to dl people often results in being nothing to
t
t
t
I
t
genericvw*
behaviours
anyone,
Level of Analysis
1i
;r
I
I
I
li
I
The job analpis terms defined in Exhibit 4.3 are arwged in a hierarchy. The level in this hierar
job
chy at which'an analysis begins may influence whether dre work is similar or dissimilu. At the
family level bookkeepers, tilletr, *d accoundng clerks may be considered similar, yet at the job
level they are very different. Arr andory might be looking at two grains of salt under a rnicroscopc
jobs are similar,
as against looking ar ihem as part of a sewing of french fries. If job daa zuggest
the jobs mrrst be paid equa$'; if ,iobs are different, they can be paid differendy.
In pracdce, many employers are ffnding it difficult to justifr the time and ercpense of collecting task-lwel information, particularly for 0exible jobs with frequendy changing tasls. Thry may
_\
Chaprer4 | lobAnalysts
l.Markthecircleinthe"DoThis"columnfortasksthatyoucurrentlyperform.
2, At the end of the task list, write in any unlisted tasks that you
currentty
/
/-
/Timespentlncurrcntposition
a**
"E ^C -r**
':::::,taskthatyouperformforrelative.,'",:;*''".*,
" the appropriate circle in the "Time Spent" column.
Please use a No. 2 pencil and
C oo@@@@o@o
to
of products.
Communicate with system software group to see how their
recent changes impact current projects.
427. 5tudy and evaluate state-of-the-art techniques
C
C ooo@o@o@@
c ooo@o@o@@
to remain
4i0.
is
specified.
435.
C o@o@@@o@@
;
;
T
T
;
being implemented
t
T
t
t
o ooo@@@o@@
63
with manager,
o o@o@@@@@@
o o@@@o@o@o
o
o o@@@o@@@@
o o@o@o@@@o
C o@@@@@o@@
I
t
Partl I lt*naUili'g,on
64
:
EXHIEIT
4.7
rt hE ttrtg*c
Sa:acttat
of interaction between
people involved in various kinds
of work.
aspeqts
4.1: Communications
Rate. the following in terms of how important the activity is to the completion of the job. Some jobs may
involve several or all of the items in this section.
99
100
101
1O2
103
104
t05
.l06
Advising (dealing with individuals in order to counsel and/or guide them with regard to problems
that may be resolved by legal, financial, scientific, technical, clinical, spiritual, and/or professional
principles)
Negotiating (dealing with others in order to reach an agreement or solution, for example, labour
bargaining, diplomatic relations, etc.)
Persuading (dealing with others in order to influence them toward some action or point of view,
for example, selling, political campaigning, etc.)
lnstructing (the teaching of knowledge or skills, in either an informal or a formal manner, to
for examplg a public school teacher, a machinist teaching an apprentice, etc.)
lnterviewjng (conducting interviews directed toward some specific objective, for example,
interviewing job applicants, census taking, etc.)
Routine information exchange: job-related (the giving and/or receiving of job-related information
of a routine nature, for examplg ticket agent, taxicab dispatcher, receptionist, etc.)
Nonroutine information exchange (the giving and/or receiving ol job-related information of a
nonroutine or unusual nature, for examplg professional committee meetings, engineers discussing
new product design, etc.)
others,
Public speaking (making speeches or formal presentations before relatively large audiences, for
example, political addresses, radio/TV broadcasting. delivering a sermon, etc.)
Writing (for example, writing or dictating letters, reports, etc., writing copy for ads, writing
newspaper articles. etc.; does not include transcribing activities described in item 4.3, but only
activhies in which the incumbent creates the written material)
Source: E. J. McCormick, P. R. Jeanneret, and R. C. Mecham, Position Analysis Questionnaire, @ 1969 by Purdue Research
Foundation. West Lafayette, lN 47907. Reprinted with permission.
collect only jobJevel data and ernphasize comparisons in the external market in sening wages.
Howcvcr, designing career paths, staffing, and legd compliance may also require more detailed
information. Using broad, generic descriptions that cover a large number of related tasks doser to
the job family level in Exhibit 4.3 is one way to increse floribility. Two employees working in the
same broadly defined job may be doing entirely different sets of related tasls. But for pay purposes,
they are doing work of equal value. Enrployees working in these broadly defined jobs carr swirch
to other tasks thdt fall within the broad range without the bureaucratic burden of making job
uansfer requests and wage adjustrnents. Thus, employees c:ln more easily be matched rc changes
in the worldlow. Reauiter, compensation analyst, and training specialist could each be analyzed x
a separate, distinct job, or could all be combined rnore broadly in the job "HR Associate."
!
t.-.*
Chapter4 | lobAnalyt:
!l
ii
i,
;:,.
i,
i,
i.
Quantitative Methods
will direct job holden ro a website where they complete a questionnaire
online. (Exhibirs 4.6 and 4.7 are excerpts 6om quandmtive questionnaires.) Such an approach
is charactcrized as qurntitatirc job andy:is, because the results can be analpcd arithmedcally. A
quancitadve quesdonnairc gpically asks job holders to assess whether each item is or is nor part
',, of
rheir job. If it is, drey arc asked to rate how imponant it is, and the amount of job time spenr
ion it. The results can be machinc scored like a muldple-choice test (except there are no wrong
'answers),
and thc results
be used rc develop a profile of the job. Questions can be grouped
eround compensable factors (discussed in Chaprcr 5) such as skill and working condidons. Skill
can be fi.uther subcategorized as formal qualifrcations, o<perience, occupational skils, atrd
management skills. Assistance is given in t}.e form of prompting questions and a list of jobs rhat
hive answercd each question in a simila-r way. Results can be used to prepare a job profile based
on the compensable Factors. Ifmore than one person is doing a particular job, resula ofseveral
people in the job can be compared or averaged to develop the profile. Profiles can be compared
across job holders in the same or in different jobs.
Increasingly, an analyst
ll
ll
I
I
I
I
T
t
t
I
I
Il
-.
Some connrlting ffrms have dweloped quantiative inventories they can tailor to the needs
of a speciffc orgaaization or to a specfic family ofjobs, such as data/informadon processing jobs.
t
t
t
il
;
Perc
EXHIBIT
4.8
I I Inmnal
Chaprcr
4 | lob
,l-'a*!t
."AnO
job analpis information rhrough one-on-on inerviews can be a thankless raskLo* *.ll ir is done, nor everyone will be happy witl rhe resulting job descriptions.
No -"n.t
employee (oftcn justifying the assigoAlhough organizations frequendy assrgn the task to a new
new
employee
become familiar wi*r rhe conpanyi
the
will
help
it
thar
gronnds
rhe
*n, oi
with de organizatioo and its
thoroughly
hmiliar
someone
done
by
is
bemer
analysis
the
iobs),
*d rained in how to do dre analysis ProPerly'7
;obr,
-"y
'Vh"r h.pp*, if the supervisor and dre ernployces present different picrures of the job? Al.ho"gh
in theory-supervisors ought to know fie jobs well, they nay not, parcicularly if the jobs arc
changing or ill-defined. People actually worlcing in a job may change it,_perhaps by finding ways
a{9 suPto do thingr more cfficiendy, or pcrhaps because they rnay not realize that certain
t+
posed ro b! prrt oftheirjob. The crossffre from differing perspectives on the nature ofajob indicates why conducting a job analnis can be a dangerous activity for a brand-new HR employee'
I 3M had an interisting problcm when it collected job information ftom a group of engineers.
iThe engineers listed a no*t.t of responsibilities they viewed as pan of their jobs; however, che
*.n"g.i realized that those responsibilities actually belonged to a higher level of work. The engienlarged their jobs biyond what they were being paid to d9-. No one wanted to tell this
"...rl"d
trighly productive group ofemployees to throtde back and slack off, so instead 3M looked for
reguild to ensure
consistent,
the results.
f.opo..d
At
afit
5t
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
il
6a
Structura
that changes may result after it is completed. For example, jobs may be combined or pay rates
If top management and unions are not willlng to crury cluough, or ar lea$ ro seriously
weigh, any changes suggested by the job analysis, the process probably will not be wonh the
adjusted.
drer and
expense.
;i-
LO4
job description
written stmmary of a
job, itxluding raponsi b iI ities, q u a Iifi c:,ti o n s,
and relationships
job specifications
qualifiations requi red to
T_T
So now the job information has been collected, maybe even organized. But it still has to be summarized in a way that will be usefi.rl for HR dccisions, induding job evaluation (Chapter 5). That
surnmary of the job is the job description. Thc job description provides a word picture of the job.
Exhibit 4.9 gives part of a job description for a registered nurse. fiace the connection
job analysis &ta colleced. The job is identiffed
by dde ind its reladonships to other jobs. The relationships dernonsuate where rhe job fits into
berween different para of the description and the
ttre organization-whom is supervised by this job holdcr, who supervises this job holder, and the
nature of any internal and exernal relationships. A job summary consiss of a short paragraph
that provides an overview of the job. The section on essendal responsibilitics elaborates on the
sunmary. It includes dre tasks. Relaed tasks may be grouped into task dimensions.
This particular job dercription also includes very specific standards for judging whether an
essential responsibiliry has been met (e.g., "Provides a wrinen assessment of patient within one
hour ofadmission and at least once a shift"). A ffnal section lists the qualiffcations necssary to
be hired for the job. These are the job speciffcations that can be used as a basis for hiring-the
knowledge, skills, and abilities required to adequately perform the tasks. But keep in mind that
the summary must be relevant to pay decisions and therefore must focus on similarities and differences in content.
it can be useful to refer to generic job descriptions tfiat have not yet been
tailored to a specific organization. One readily accessible source is rhe National Occuparional
cross-check octernally,
.Net'lforth
box here.
Chapter4 | JobAnalyis
EXF1EIIJ:9
Contemporary
lol
N_unse
Job Title
Registered Nurse
Accountable for the complete spectrum of patient care from admission through transfer or
discharge through the nursing process of assessmen! planning. implementation, and evaluation.
Each RN has primary authority to fulfill responsibility of the nursing process on the assigned shift
and for projecting future needs ofthe patienVfamily. Directs and guides patient teaching and
activities for ancillary personnel while maintaining standard of professional nursing.
Relationships
ReporB to: Head Nurse or Charge Nurse.
Supervises.' Responsible
LPNs,
and transcriben.
Works with: Ancillary Care Departments.
Exter na I re I ationships: Physicians, patients, patients' fam i I ies.
Qualifications
Education: Graduate of an accredited school of nursing.
Work experiencel Critical care requires one year of recent medical/surgical experience
(special<are nursing preferred), medical/surgical experience (new graduates may be considered
for non<harge positions).
Licence or registntion requiremenb: Current RN licence or permh in the Province of Alberta.
Physical requirements: A.
B.
C. Visual
Essential Responsibilities
1. Assess physical, emotional, and psychosocial dimensions
3.
of patients.
Standard:
Formulates a
Standard:
Standard:
I
;
Job Summary
2.
69
sessingprioritiesappropriately.
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
T
t
I
I
70
Classification (NOC) for reference when prepJlring job descriptions' The NOC is an excellent source of standardized job information, based on systematic field research by
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. lt contains comprehensive descriptions and qualifications for over 40.000 occupations. NOC information is available online
at wrnrwS.hrsdc.gc.ca/NOOEng lish/NO020 1 lAtVelcome'aSpx'
The NOC classifies occupations into Major Groups based on two key dimensions: skill
level and skill type. The Major Groups, identified by two'digit numbers, are further
broken down into Minor Groups, with a third digit added, and unit Groups, with a
fourth digit. For example, Major Group ll: Professional occupations in business and
finance includes Minor Group 112: Human resources and business service professionals,
which includes Unit Group 1121: Human Resources Professionals:
and
Human resources professionals develop, implement and evaluate human resources
employers
and
managers
procedures
and
advise
and
programs
labour relations policies,
on human resources matters. Human resources professionals are employed throughout
profes'
the private and public sectors, or they may be self-employed. Human resources
duties:
following
the
all
of
or
perform
some
sionals
plan, develop, implement and evaluate human resources and labour relations strat'
egies including policies, programs and proeedures to address an organization's
policies,
Advise managers and employees on the interpretation of human resources
compensation and benefit programs and collective agreements
tabour
Negotiate collective agreements on behalf of employers or workers, mediate
relations
labour
and
on
employee
provide
advice
and
grievances
disputes and
t
T
t
r
.
r
plan and administer staffing, total compensation, training and career developprograms
ment, employee assistance, employment equity and affirmative action
Manage programs and maintain human resources information and related records
r
T
T
T
I
I
systems
r
r
r
Adult
Source: Current And Forthcoming Minimun Hourly Wage Rates For Experienced
H uman
workers in canada. httB:/isrv 1 1 6.services.gc.caldimt-wid/sm-mw/rptl aspx? lang=en9
permission of the
with
the
2012.
Reproduced
canada,
Skills
Development
and
Resources
Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2012'
L__.
for reference.
Chaper4 |
NAuIF
DfiIBIT 4.1O
Department
ICU
r':
Status: OPen
l,
I
Position Description:
Under the direction of the Vice-President of Patient Care Services and Directors of Patient Care
Services, the Nurse Manager assumes 24-hour accountability and responsibility for the operations of
defined patient specialty services. The Nurse Manager is administratively responsible for the coordination, direction, implementation, evaluation, and management of human resources and services.
The Nurse Manager provides leadership in a manner consistent with the corporate mission. values,
and philosophy and adheres to policies a4d procedures established by Saint Joseph's Hospital and
the Division of Patient Care Services. The Nurse Manager participates in strategic planning and
defining future direction for the assigned areas of responsibility and the organization.
l'
Qualification:
Education: Graduate of accredited school of nursing. A bachelor's degree in Nursing or related field
required. Mastert degree preferred. Current licence in the Province of Nova Scotia as a Registered
Nurse.
re
Experience: A minimum of three years' clinical nursing is required. Minimum of two years' management experience or equivalent preferred.
have been iareresting to hear the discussion bennecn a nursc from 100 years o,
job is described in Exhibic 4.11, and her supervisor. Thc job description paints a vivid
picrure of expeftadons at fiat rime. It is unJikely that she would havc had much opponuniry for
input 100 yea$ ago.
ft would
whose
EXHIBIT 4.11
E']..,.,].:''']''l'.']1',!ii.:E
ln addition to caring for your 50 patients, each nune will follow these regulations:
2.
Daily sweep and mop the floors of your ward, dust the patienfs furniture and window sills.
Maintain an even temperature in your ward by bringing in a scultle of coal for the day's
3.
business.
Light is important
1.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
ry
I
I
I
ff
i
71
to observe the patient's condition. Therefore, each day, fill kerosene lamps,
clean chimneys, and trim wicks. Wash the windows once a week.
The'nurse's notes are important in aiding the physician's work. Make your pens carefully; you
may whittle nibs to your individual taste.
Each nurse on the day duty will report every day at 7 a.m. and leave at 8 p.m..except on the
Sabbath, on which day you will be off from 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m.
Graduate nurses in good standing with the director of nurses will be given an evening off
each week for courting purposet or two evenings a week if you go regularly to church'
Each nurse should lay aside from each pay day a goodly sum of her earnings for her benefits
during her declining years, so that she will not become a burden. For example, if you earn $30
a month you should set aside $15.
Any nurse who smokel uses liquor in any form, gets her hair done at a beauty shop, or frequents
dance halls will give the director good reason to suspect her worth, intentions, and integrity..
The nurse who performs her labours and serves her patients and doctors faithfully and
without fault {or a period of five years will be given an increase by the hospital administration
of five cents a day, provided there are no hospital debts that are outstanding.
t
t
I
T
t
I
I
il
72
I---I
Ya*
to Offshoring
offshoring
movemattof iohs ta lcr.a'
tions beyond lnme-country
boters
lgcations.
b.yo4.home-couatY
borders.
are subHistoricalf, rnanual, low-skill jobs have been most siuceptible to offshoring, as t-here
workers.
for
rnanufacturing
counties
across
cost
cornpensation
standal differences in hourly
.This reality has played an important role in decisions about where to locate productigt oPlo:
have had
tioru. Siiar diff.reo..s in iost in other low-skill occupations (e.g', in call centres)
as there are producdvity
in
decisions,
such
facor
one
only
is
cost
Labour
ramifications.
similar
cascs be offiet
differences across countries as well, rneaning that lower labour cosu may in some
is another
skills
and
by lower productiviry. Availabiliry of workers with the required education
sense
to move
.r*ri.i*d
t.
;;;;;i."
*a nai",
;irt;tdr-mers
in
Canada
cl+
Los
I_-I
"t
Reliability
the meaIf something is measured tomorov/ and the results are the same as those from today,
nieasures
repeated
that
is
right-only
mean
it
doesnt
This
reliablc.
surement is-considered to be
reliability
corsist?nq of re5'ultrhom
repeated aqqlications of a
'-measure
S*
";
,r-.
is
job-
i"lrt. -"y
Chapter
4 | lobAna$is
T3
ValiditY
job analysis masures whac it claims to measure.
Vatrdity is rhe extent to which a process such as
to
whether
the analysis creates an accurarc portrait of the
as
the
question
widr
concerned
It is
statistically
the ertent to which an andysis is accurate,
no
of
showing
almost
way
is
There
work,
oanicularly for cornplex jobs. Consequently, validiry o<amines convergence of results among
sources of data and rnethods. For example, validiry might be assessed by measuring *re
exrenr ro which rhe job andysis resuhs represent the entire range of acdvities and responsibilides
rcquired by rhe job, and by measuring the extent to which there is agreement becween a variety of
oeople ftmiliar wirh rhe job riat the job andysis results are representative of the job. However, a
,ign-offon the resufts does not guarantee validiry. It might only mean everyone was sick to death
oi,h. pto..s and wanted to get rid of the analyst so they could get baclc ro work.
hiff.r.n,
AcceptabilitY
I6job holders and managers are dissarisfi.ed with the initial data collected or with rhe process, they
are nor likely ro buy ilrto either rhe resulUng job sructure or the pay rates evenrually anached to
rhat strucure. A-u analpt collecdng informadon through one-on-one inrerviews or observation
is not alwap accepced because of rhe potenrid for subjectiviry and favouritism. However, more
quanrirative approachcs also may run into difficulty, especially if they give in to the ternptation
ro rry to collect too much information for too many PurPoses
Currency
To be valid, acceptable, and useful (see bdow), job informadon must be up to date. Sorne jobs
rtry relatively stable over dme, wbjle odrers may changc in important wa1n, even ovet short time
periods. .As F:xhibit 4.12 shows, most organizations report that tley have up-m-date job informaiiion, but a substantial minoriry reporr rhat job information is not up to date. That can hinder
d.crtio.t making but also employe selection, trainin", md
not O"ty compensation pracdce
i
it
"id
or bi-annual)
development.-Mosr organizarions do not engage in any regular G"* * annual
when
information
updatejob
to
likely
more
b.ing
,.rpd".irrg of job analysii information, i*tod
compensation
for
job
reevaluated
is
being
dae
when
Puror
slgnifr;r .Lrrrgo have occurred
job
information
when
for
ev"aluating
protocol
a
systematic
ro
develop
pf.er.tl It *"y f,. useful
needs to be updated.l2
Usefulness
\Jsefulness refers
i
:'
to the
usefrrlness
job-it
helps deterprovides work-related infognadon to help determine how much to pay for a
in
a reliable,
does
this
job
andysis
mine
job is similar or dissimilar to other jobs. If
nttid,
then thetechnique is of pracdcal t'se'13
,
".".ptil.way,
such
As we have nored, soroe see job analysis information as useful for muldple purposes,
yhJ;;;;
*d
u hiring
than is required to
ar,J toirrlrrg. But multiile puposes rnay require more information
*ro,
validity
accuracy
ofa
rneas.r'e
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
t
t
t
I
I
I
'''
74
EXHIBIT
Pa,n
4.12
I I Intenal
t
I
tI
A Judgment Call
why on earth would you
In the face of all rhe difficulties, time, expinse, and dissatishction,
as a
ii"bl.,
detail is needed to
If work informadon is required, the reJ issue should bel How much
individual employees' Pay' encouragemake these pay decisions? The answer is: enough to help-set
*otkfotce, and minimize therisk of
th.
of
tkill
conrinuous learning, ir,.r."r. the experience "ia
employees who drive awav
is
dissatisfted
detail
this
of
omiuing
The risk
;;;;;J;;;;;*".;'.
,*r, .,
.o-pl"i',
Conclusion
Clrapter
r.i;,
4 { lo6'azaly;s
A kry rest of an effecdve and fair pay structue is acceptance of resuks by managers a-nd
employees, The best way to ensure accepunce ofjob analysis results is to involve ernployees as
well as supervisors in 6,e process. fu a minimum, all employees should be informed of the purposcs and Progress ofdre accivity.
Afthough almost everyoae agrees about rhe importance of job analysis, that does not mean
rhat everyone does it. Unfomrnateh, job analpis can be tedious and dme-consuming. Often,
the job is given to newly hired compensation analyse, ostensibly ro help them learn about the
organizadon; but there may also !s 3 hinl of "rite of passage" in such assignmens.
Alternatives to job-based $rucnues, such as skill-based or competency-based qystems, are
being experimented wirh in ma:ry ftrms. The premise is that basing strucnues on r"hese ottrer
criteria will encourage employees to become more flercible, and fewer workers will be required
for r}e same level of ourpuL Bur as ocperience increases with these alternatives, managers are
discovering that they can be as timc-consuming and bureaucratic as job analpis. Bear in mind
rhat job content remains the coaventiond criterioo for strucnrres.
E
L
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chapter SummarY
Job analysis is rhc rystematic process of collecting information about the narure of specfic
jobs. Job analysis data are used is vimrally every major HR function, lncluding recruitiag
and selection, uaining, compensation, and so on.
Therc is a six-step approach to job analpis: develop preliminary job information, conduc!
initial tour of work site, conduct interviews, conduct second tour of work site, consolidar
job ffirmation, and verifr job description.
The information that must b colleced for job analysis includes job identiffcation &ta job
conrcnt data, and data on qualifications nece.ssarl to do the job. Job content data are 6e
hearr of job analysis, and indude the tasks involved, their purpose, reponing relitiooship+
working conditions, and otler specifrc job information. Conventional methods of collecdng
job analysis data such as qucsdonnaires and interviews are being replaced by o"line qucsdonnaires, because the lattcr are more objective and less time-consuming'
Job descriptions provide a wrimen summary of a job, including responsibilities, gualifications, and rclationships. Job specificadons are the qualificacions required to be hired for a
rli
J
J
J
iI
J
iI
I
I
iI
I
II
t
76
job analysis
job description
job specifications
offshoring
Position
Analysis
,F..
"
reliability
validity
Questionnaire (PAQ)
Review Questions
1.
2,
3.
4.
Ir
I
t
t
I
t
T
I
What are the two critical uses of job analysis for compensation decisions?
Describe the major decisions involved in job analysis'
Experiential Exercises
1.
to several managers and find one who claims to have never heard of job analysis' Ask
the manager how job descriptions (if there are any) in the organization are developed' Ask
whether there are any problems because of jobs that overlap, problems with performance
evaluations. and problems with concerns about pay fairness. How might these problems
be related to the lack of job analysis information?
Talk
Z, a.
Think of a specific job you presently hold or have held in the past (including a parttime job or volunteer work). use the information in this chapter to develop a job
analysis questionnaire that you believe would adequately capture all relevant information about that job. Then complete the questionnaire for your specific job'
b.
pick a teammate (or the instructor will assign one) and exchange questionnaires with
your teammate'
c.
Write
d.
Exchange descriptions. Critique the job description written by your teammate. Does it
adequately capture all the important job aspects? Does it indicate which aspects are
job description for your teammate's job, Does the questionnaire give you sufficient information? ls there additional information that would be helpful?
a
most imPortant?
Case
The Customer Service Agent
Read the following articl6 on a day in the work life of Bill Ryan. Then write a job description
for the job of customer service agent. Use the exhibits in this chapter to guide you in deciding
what information in the story is relevant for job analysis.
F
T
I I Intemat Alignment:
Key Terms
F
F
I
I
I
Part
1.
2.
3..
Does
ldentify the specific information in the article that you found useful.
What additional information do you require? How would the information help you?
pick a teammate (or the instructor will assign one) and exchange job descriptions with your
teammate.
a.:
Chaptcr4 | lobAtalyit
1.
2.
3.
How similar/different are the two descriptions? You and your teammate started with
exactly the same information. What might explain any differences?
What process would you go through to understand and minimize the differences?
What are some of the relational returns of the job?
Bill Ryan often deals with difficult people. lt's what he gets paid for. He's one of 30 customer
service agents at Half.com, an online marketplace owned by eBay Inc., the Internet auction
company. Like eBay. Half.com attemptsto match buyers and sellers in a vastflea marketfeaturing millions of products ranging from trading cards to camcorders. But unlike eBay, there! no
bidding. Half.com lists items only at a fixed price. lf you see something you like, pay the price
and it's yours.
The other big difference from eBay is that for most products listed on Half,com, there's no way
for buyers and sellers to interact directly. Usually there's no need to. To make a purchase, buyers
use their credit cards or chequing accounts to pay Half.com, which then automatically credits
the amount to the seller's card or account, minus a transaction fee. Once the payment is made,
the seller ships the product.
Despite a well-oiled system, however, questions arise. Things can go wrong. A purchased item
doesn't arrive, or isn't in the condition the buyer expected. Or maybe an interesting product is
listed but its description isn't clear. And that's where Ryan and his colleagues come in, handling
the buckets of e-mail and intermittent phone calls from curious, addled. and upset users. They
pass information between buyers and sellers, answer questions, and resolve the occasional dispute. Half,com says that fewer than 1 percent of the site's transactions require customer service
involvement. But with more than 15 million items for sale-well, you do the math,
In fact, the customer service department receives about 1,500 to 2,000 e-mails per day, of
which nearly a third are complainb about transactions. The rest are mostly questions about the
goods and how the site work. Ryan himself on a typical day fields between 60 and 100 e-mails
and half a dozen phone calls. The calls are the most stres#ul. "People panic and they want
answers," says Ryan. "lf they are calling, they're not happy."
For Half.com-as well as for mosl other e-commerce companies---customer service agents like
Ryan are the crucial link between the faceless website and the consumer. And how they deal
with the public can make or break a busines. As Half.com's vice-president for operations says,
"lt costs too much to get a new customer only to fumble the relationship away." Half.com
won't discuss salaries, brfi Ryan and his colleagues, who are split into two shifts covering 8 a.m.
to midnight, seven days a weeh say they're satisfied with their wages, which include quarterly
bonuses.
What he likes about his work Ryan says, is the kjnd of customer problem that requires research
and deep digging to find the resolution. What he sometimes doesnl like about his work are the
routine questions that generate stock responses. Here! a day in Ryan's work life:
He started doing strictly customer service, answering customer e-mails. Now he also does what
the company calls "trust and safety work": investigating fraud and looking for things on the
site that are "funky." For instance, when Half.com receives a complaint from a buyer about
a seller. itl Bill Ryan's job to contact both parties and niake sure there is no fraud occurring.
This day, because the site has received a high volume of e-mails, he's on regular customer service duty. After checking the few internal e-mail messages he receives each day. he gets right
7t
78
Paml I latenalAlignwc
Dutriniq *c Stnc*rc
Ryan downloads his first batch of ten e-mails for the day. He says it usually takes him
about an hour to get through ten messages.
to work.
8:10 a.m.: The first e-mail is from a woman interestedln buying an audio book on CD she saw
listed on the site. she wants to know whether the CD will work on her DVD player. But because
she doesn't specify the exact lirting, Ryan is stuck. He can't search for it among all the listings
or contact the seller. The best he can do is suggest that she send him an item number so that
he can contact the seller with her question.
comes from a user who sold the Diana Krall CD When I Look in Your
but lost the buyer's shipping information. The seller is concerned that a delay in her shipment will give the buyer reason to give her a negative rating on the site. After each irurchase is
made, the buyer gets a chance to rate the seller's performance on a scale from 1 to S-"poor"
to "excellent." Every rating sellers collect is displayed along with their user name ne)iltto subsequent items they list, Just one negative rating can ruin a sellert reputation, depending on how
8:15
a.m.:lhenext e-mail
Eyes,
trBck down the details on this particular transaction in the Half.com user database. He
identifies the buyer and writes an e-mail to explain that the seller lost the shipping address
and "wants to let you know they are sorry for the inconvenience," He then e-mails the buyer's
shipping address to the seller.
Ryan
Ryan says he doesnt find the e-mails tedious. "There is such a variety oftopics to respond to,"
he says. "l.never get 50 of the same questions in a row." But a few e-mails later, he shrugs with
disapproval. The user! guestion could easily have been answered by going to the help section
of the website: "Do I include shipping in the sale price or is it added later?"
Says Ryan, "lt's a general question. I like the detailed research questions." He pastes in an
answer from a database of stock responses the customer service team has put together. He then
tacks onto the end of the email a salutation that he draws from a list of suggested message
closers provided by Half.com. The list, the company says, makes it easier for the agents to write
so many e-mails. For this message, Ryan chooses, "lt was my pleasure to assist you."
Got Juice
9:30 a.m.: After answering a few more messages, it's time for a coffee break. Ryan says he
drinks two cups of coffee a day, a habit he picked up since starting at Half.com. "A year ago I
wouldn't have touched the stuff," he says. He heads to the kitchen, which is just down the hall
from his desk, The well-lit room is stocked with free cappuccino, juice, pop. cereal, cookies, and
other munchies. The cafeteria also doubles as a lounge, with a satellite television playing TSN,
a Foosball table, and a ping-pong table. This early in the morning, however, most people are
interested in the coffee.
9:48 a.m.: An e-mail arrives from a Half.com colleague in charge of the stock-answer database.
He writes that a response Ryan submitted on how users can sign up for direct deposit-linking
their Half.com transactions with their chequing account-would be included in the database.
"There are so many things we don't have responses to," Ryan says. "lt makes everyone's life
easier to have the database."
l0:00 a,m.:The first ten e'mails are done, Ryan downloads ten more. One is from a father who
several days earlier ordered the latest Sony Play5tation 3 for his sonS birthday and is concerned
because it hasn't arrived yet. Half,com's policy is that if a buyer hasn't received an item within
30 days of purchase, he or she can lodge an official complaint, The PlayStation seller is thus
a long way from the delivery deadline. Nevertheless, as a courtesy, Ryan sends the seller and
e.mail asking whether he can provide a shipping date and tracking number that Ryan can pass
on to the restless father.
Half,com believes that help like this-beyond the requirements of its own rules---5eparates its
customer service approach from that of other companies. When the company was starting out,
says training supervisor Ed Miller, customer service tried to respond to as many messages as it
could, as fast as possible. What the company learned, however, is that "customers don't mind if
--'rt
.8,I
li
Chaprer4 | JobAnalyis
79;
;
I
you take a little more time to answer their specific question," Instead of just firing off e-mails,
Half.com now sees it as important to personalize each message. Even with the personalization,
Half.com says it resPonds to most messages within 24 hours. Communications with customers
have a consistent and pleasant tone. E-mail messages conform to the "grandmother rule,,, Each
to my grandmother."
Wrecking Crew
10:30 a.m.: Time to knock down some walls. Lively human resources worker Alicia Di Ciacco
invites Ryan and his colleagues to pick up sledgehammers and knock through a wall at the
end of the office. Half.com's staff has doubled in the past yea4 and the company is expanding
into adjacent space in the old tire factory. Everyone in the office takes turns whacking at the
wall. Some of the younger males dish out screams of "l'm not going to take it anymore!,, and
"Where's the Pink Floyd?"-a reference to the 1970s rock album The Wall.
Ryan eats up the office energy. "lt's exciting to work here," he says. "We're growing. We had
the second launch of the site. (Half.com expanded the product line in April.) We're doing construction. ltt good to come to work when the company is doing well."
with a batch of ten e-mails, Ryan downloads ten more, including two sepafrom customers who can't redeem special introductory coupons Half.com offers to
lXTi:""::
I 1:47 a.m.: Ryan gets an e-mail from a seller responding to a message from Half.com. A poten
tial buyer has asked Half.com whether the sellert 75-cent copy of Carolyn Davidson's Harlequin
romance The Midwife is a paperback or hardcover. Half.com forwarded the question to the
seller, who now is writing back to say it's a paperback. Ryan sends two e-mails: one to the buyer,
answering his question, and one to the seller, thanking him for the information.
l2:10 p.m.: Ryan eats his turkey wrap in the company cafeteria with some colleagues and heads
back to his desk by 1 p,m.
p.m.: E-mail from a user who can't find the new Stephen King novel on Half.com, The she
supposed to list all new books from major publishers, even if no one is selling them. That way.
if a user is interested, he or she can put it on a wish list and the site will automatically e.mail
him or her when a copy has been posted for sale. Ryan searches for the book meticulously,
checking by title, author, and publisher's ISBN number. Once he! sure the book isn't listed, he
e-mails Matt Walsh, who is in charge of fixing catalogue errors. Ryan then e-mails the user and
instructs him to check back at the site soon.
1:06
is
1:21 p.m.: First phone call of the day. Because Half.com prefers to conduct customer service
on e-mail, to keep its costs down, it doesnt display its phone number on its website. Still,
persistent users get the number through directory assistance or other sources. This caller, an
agltated buyer of the video Valley Girl, a 1983 comedy starring Nicolas Cage, says she received
a damaged tape. She has lodged an official complaint against the seller on the site, brt.t the
seller hasn't responded, Ryan tells her that the five days the seller has to respond aren't up yel
He assures her that if the seller doesn't respond within the allotted time, he will refund her
I
I
I
I
f
r
t
80
dtc Stracnrc
money and charge the seller! account. LJntil then, there's nothing Ryan can do except comfort
the caller with apologies and explanations.
ln the event that the seller disputes the buyer's clairii about the tape. Half.com is still likely to
grant.the refund, especially on such an inexpehsive item. Half.com makes it clear; however, that
its customer service team keeps a close watch on users'complaints, looking out for fraudulent
refund requests. lf Half,com suspects foul play, it doesn't grant refunds so easily.
2:02 p.m.: A seller of the video I Know What You Did Lart Summer got the package returned,
marked address unknown. Ryan looks up the buyer's information in the user database and
e-mails him, asking for an updated address to forward to the seller. He then e-mails the seller,
telling him the address should be on its way shortly.
2:21 p,m.: Ryan downloads ten more e-mails.
Home Stretch
2:30 p,m.: The day is starting to get long, at least to an obseryer. But Ryan says sitting still all
day doesn't cramp his style. "Sometimes itt tough to work at a desk, but it doesn't really bother
me," he says. "l work out after work, and that really loosens things up."
3:00 p.m.: Washroom break.
p.m.: With the clock ticking toward quifiing time, Ryan works on finishing his last batch
lt! more of the same: a user unsure how Half.com works; a seller who wants to list
a 1976 edition of The Grapes of Wrath but can't figure out where to put it on the site; a buyer
who wants a book shipped second-day air, even though the order was already placed.
3:1 5
of e-mails.
3:30 p.m.: A call from a buyer interrupts Ryan's streak of dispensing e-mails. The buyer felt
that the quality of a book she bought was not up to snuff. The book, a $2 copy of Danielle
torn cover, The buyer is upset, but Ryan remains calm, calling
on skills he learned in a one-day seminar "Dealing with Difficult People." ln the class, which
he took before coming to Half,com, he learned to paraphrase what the customer is saying to
make sure he understands the complaint. Ryan also takes care to speak clearly with a strong
sense of empathy. At one point he says, "l understand your frustration." When he explains that
the buyer will have to wait some time for a final resolution of the matte[ he makes sure to
preface it with a heartfelt "l'm sorry to let you know . , ." An observer listening to Ryan gets
the sense that he is not acting.
Steel's Secre8, apparently had a
"lf you don't understand what they are saying, then you have a problem," he sap. Though he
can't satisfy this customer then and there, he promises to talk to his supervisor and to call her
back tomorrow with more information.
p.m.: The day is done. Ryan finishes his last e-mail, closes up his desk, and heads home. A
new shift of workers picks up where Ryan left off, toiling from 4 p.m. to midnight. When they
finish, the customer service staff in eBay's facility in Salt Lake City will take over. Tomorrow
Ryan will be back on duty at I a.m.. downloading his first ten e-mails.
4:OO
ffi-
to practise important concepts at your own pace and on your own schedule, with
to an eBook, Practice Quizzes, Study Tools, and more.
with Connect.
I
I
I
LEARNING OUTCOMES
LO1 Define job evaluation and explain the different perspectives regarding this
'activity.
LO2 Describe the ranking method of job evaluation and explain two specific
methods of ranking,
LO3
Discuss
LO4 Explain the six steps involved in the point method of job evaluatlon
105
How does any organizacion go about valuing work? Ac a supermarket, there are many rypes
of work; store managr, produce manager, front-end manager, deli workers, butchers, stock
clerks, checkour people, balcers-the lisc is long, and the work surprisiirgly diverse. Specifically,
whar rechniques are used to value work, and would the techniques really matter?
This chapcer and rhe next discuss techniques used to value work. Both chapters focus on the
"how ro"-rhe specific sreps involved. Job eva.luadon techniques are discussed in this chapter;
person-based techniques, borh skill-based and competency-based, are discussed in Chapter 6.
The objective of all the rechniques is an inrernally aligned job suucture on which to base pay
decisions. Uldmacely, the pay srrucrure helps the organization sustain its competirive advancage
by infl uencing employee behaviours.
--II
Exhibic 5.1 is an elaborarion of Exhibit 4.i in dre previous chapter. It describes the process of
building a job structure on which to base the ultimate pay sffucftre. Job analysis and job descriprions (Chaprer 4) collected and summarized work information. In this chapter, the focus is on
horv ro derermine what to value in the jbbs, how to quantifr that value, and how to uanslate
LO1
R','
':.r --
il
I
I
I
I
I
f
f
f
I
I
II
82
Put
EXHIBIT 5.1
lnternal Structure
\
Person-based
Job-based
/\
/\
Skill
(Chapter 5)
Competencies
(Chapter 6)
PURPOSE
I
Collect,
work
information
lr
r
(Chapter4)
it
Determine what
to
value
I
|
Job evaluation:
classes or
++
Assess
Job descriptions
value
'
compensable factors
(chapter 5)
Factor degrees and
weighting
(Chapter 5)
into
structure
Translate
job structure
hierarchy
of
att
johs
basd
'
b the oryaniation;
provides the basis for the pay
on value
structure
job evaluation
the procas of systematically determining the relative
worth of johs to create a job
structure for the organization
Job-based structure
(Chapter 5)
that value into a job structure. Job evaluation is the process of determining and quantifring
potentid to blend internal forces and o..rrrJ marker forces is both a srength and a
challenge for job evaluation.
Tiadidonal job-based approachcs to creating internal structure (dating back to the 1930s)
were predictcd by some to bccome obsolete when newer persqn-based approaches (discussed in
Chapter 6) bccamc popular during thc 1990s. However, two decades later, job evaluation is sdll
nalue, The
Chapter
83
jOB
ANALYSIS +
JOB
DESCRIPTIONS
JOB
EVALUATIoN +
JOB STRUCTURE
EVALUATION
SOME MAJOR DECISION5 IN JOB
.
.
Establish purpose
Decide whether
of evaluation.
to
use single
or multiple plans.
diffcr on whedrer job erraluation is based on job content or job value. A suucnue
job
conrenr refers to the skills required for the job, irc duties, and its responsibilities. A
based on
on job vrlue. refers to the relative conuibucion of the skills, dudes, and resporuibased
sffucflge
bilities of a job to the organizationt goals. But can this suucrure translate direcdy into pay rates,
without regard to the enternal market, goveflrment regulations, or any individual negodation
process? Mosr people think not. Recall drat internd alignment is just one of the building blocks
of the pay modd. Job characteristics matter, but they are noq the only basis for pay. Job value may
also include its value in the external nurket and/or its reladonship co some other set of rates that
has been agreed upon tbrough collective bargaining or other negotiarion process or to governperspectives
'
Not only may th,e content be described and rralued differendy by different observers, but the
work may be more or less in one organization than in another. It wzs
',Some see
,rf
il"
il
84
P* I I Inmtal Ahgnu* Wq
* Saleat
But not evertone agrees. A daneloper of the Hay job evaluation plan (widely used by
large corporations) states rhat the "measures are independent of the market and encouage
rational determination of the basis for priciag job content."3 Hay claims *rat job evaluation
establishes the relative nalue ofjobs on the basis of their content, independendy of any link
to the market,
:F.-:tn_-
too, have their own perspectiYe on job ev-aluadon. Some say that if job value
can be quantified, then job evduation takes on the rappings of measurement (objecdve,
numerical, generalizable, documented, and reliable) and can be judged according to technical
standards. Jusr as with employment tests, the reliability and validiry of job evaluation plans
can be compared; rescarch will be able to tell us if ten compensable factors is too many, or if
three is too few.
Those involved in actudly making pay decisions have a different view. They see job evaluResearchers,
ation as a process rhat helps gain acceptance of pay differences between jobs-an adrninistradve
procedurc through which the panies become involved and committed. The process invites give
aqd take-an orchange of views. Employees, union representatives, and managers haggle wer
"the rules of the game" for determining relative worth. As in sports and games, we are more willing ro acccpt the resuft if we accepc the rules and believe they are applied fairb.4 This interpretatiJn is consistent with the history of job evaluation, which was begun :rs a way to bring labour
peace and order to the wage-setting process.
Some say the content of jobs has intrinsic value rhat the evaluation will uncover; others that
jUthough some claim contemrhe only hir measure of job valuc is found in the external rnarket.
fot"ry job evaluadon practi"es are just and fair,'others say they are just fur. All these perspectives
will
be caprured
in this chapter.S
the
p,trpose(s), (2) decide on single versus multiple plaas, (3) choose among alternative methods,
(<) oUt"i" involvement ofrelevant stakeholders, and (5) evaluate the usefirlness oftle results.
rI
Suppotts Qrganizational Strategy Job evaluation aligns with the organizationt suategy by
stating*har it is abour a job that adds value.(i.e., conuibutes in pursuit of the organiz:tiont
objectives). Job evaluation helps answer the question: How does this job add value?
ring cach jobt pay j
or changing
unigue,
pay
for
new,
and
by
sening
to
the
organization
its
reladve
contribution
with
i
jobs.
i
:1
pay.
I
i
'i
L_,.__
Chapter
Obiectives
5 | Job-Bucd Stracnret
and Job
Etalution
Job evduation
Motivates Behaviour towald 0rganization
values,
it is-they do that,s-rlppgrls the
that
the-organization
and-what
rheir-work
about
ir
,"rr", i,
strareg'y and promotes its ultimace success, Job wduarion also can help employees
^r""ni""riottr
,o change by improving cheir understanding of whar is valued in their assignments and
Rarely
will an ernployer
Benchmark Jobs
lo l.
1,
JOB EVALUATION
l5:
content
A measure of relative value
A link with external market
A measurement device
Negotiation
ASSUMPTION
A measure of job
.,
Puts face of rationality onto a social/political process. Establ6i:es :-game. lnvites participation. '
s :- :.re
85
A.-
Chapcr
5 | JoFBtd
87
LO2
of\forl&r\7ork, fie
Or .t . primary job
ilii"tUf.
ro jobsdescribed
jn theexter:.I
Piy,*T,T
T*..rhT
made, &. P"y rate for a job witl be based on rtre survey dae. lnernal equrty is
rnarches can be
d..mphrrized (as is the organizadon's strategr-more on this in Chapter 8).
;1v
l-- t,or. thar Exhibit 5,5 does indicate that somewhere beuween I in 3 and 1 in 4 organizadons
i-ocinue ro use traditional job evaluation approaches as their primar:r methods. Funher, it is
,
job evaluation
Jn ay 't'.,
i.re, b"."us. it is usually not possible ro direcdy match all jobs to market survey jobs. Thus,
,h Juadon is sdll needed, and we now discuss three job evaluation merhods, with most of our
or point factor approaches'
f,rr.nriott given to point
i1.ti:-T:1,I1?f:^l:lciT,fT_1"._':YllT-{:: Hk
,Ranking
simply orders the job descripcions from highest to lowesr based on a global definidon of
ijrdadve.u"lu. or contribution t1
organization's
Ranking is. the simplest,
5he
F"t:, :T1T.
employees,
and
explain
to
the
least
ocpcnsive mcthod, at lcast initially.
and
understand
.-.Aoa ro
ir can crcate problems that require difficult and potentially expensive solutions, because
t.l.Ir;
,lHor*"t,
which jobs are the most and least valuable, rhen *re next most and least v'aluablc, and so on,
dl ;obs have been ordered The paired comparison method uscs a matrix m compare all possible
'nd oflobs. The highr-rarked job is entered in the cell of dre mauix. 'When all comparisons have been
'pairs
.iompl.ted, rhc job mosr frequendy judged "more valuable' becomes drc highest-ranlced job, and so on.
Alternacion ranking and paired comparison methods may be more rdiable (produce similar resula
imore consistendy) than simple ranking. Nwenheless, ranking has drawbacks. The criteria on which the
i jobr rr. ranked usually are so poorly deffned-if they are speciffed at all-that tlre e'raluations become
.uators on
il
ranking
job evaluation method ttat
nnfs jofu from highutto
Iowestbaxdcr,aglobl
definition of nlue
alternation ranking
method
nnking the highest- a'nd
Iowst-va lued job s fi rst, then
the nextfiighest- and lowestjobs, repeatrhg the
valud
paired comparison
method
listing all jobs across cdumns
and down rows of a matrix,
comparing the lwo jobs in
each cell and indkating which
ol greater value, then
is
nnking
j&s
on the bais of
of times
rankd as fuing of
greater value
t
t
t
t
t
t
T
t
I
t
t
t
;
EXHIBIT
5.5
WHAT
IS THE PRIMARY
ALL OTHER
POINT FACTOR
MARKET PRICING
Senior management.
7SVo
14Vo '
11d/o
Middle management
70o/o
18o/o
12'/o
Professional
69%
Salbs
72o/o
16%
12o/o
Administrative
67o/o
19o/o . '
,14o/o
Production
680/o
:' t tQ"zo
'17 o/o
13Vo i
'
'
15o/o
I
;
;
;
T
T
88
Strlcttttc
T'
T
T
T
T
T
T
LO3
Ctassification
Picnue a bookcase with many shelves. Each shelf is labdled with a paragraph describing the kinds of
an4 perhaps, one or lwo representative ddes. This same approach describes the
d""siffcation qrstem ofjob evaluation. A series ofdasses covers the range ofjobs. Class descriptions
are the labels. A job description is compared to rhe class descriptions to decide vfiich dass is t.he best
fir for that job. Each class is described in suc.h a way that it caprures suficient work detail, yet is general enough to cmrse litde difficulty in sloning a job description into ia appropriate "shelfl or dass.
The dxses may be described firther by induding cides of benchrnark jobs that fall into each dass.
'Writing
dass descriptioru can be uoublesome when jobs from several job families are covered
by a single plan. For cample, dass deffnitions written witfi sales jobs in mind may make it difficult
to slot office or adminisuative jobs and vice versa. An examination of the level (dass) descriptions
books on thar shelf
classilication
job emluation method baxd
on
job
etegorhd
for the Dpntistry: Scientiffc and Professional Category ofjobs in the federd governmentt dassiffcation system in Exhibit 5.6 indicates that the broad wording of the level desciptions seems to leave a
lot of room for judgmenc Including tides of benchmark jobs for each class helps make the descriptions more concrete. So, in practice, not only are the job descriptions compared to the sundard
dass descriptions and benchmark jobs, but they also can be compared to one another to ensure
rhat jobs within each class are more similar to each other than to jobs in adjacent classes. The ftnal
roulr i, a series of classes with a number of jobs in ea&. The jobs within each class are considered
to be equal (or similar) work and will be paid equally. Jobs in different classes should be dissimilar.
EXHIBIT 5.6
Level Descriptions
I
I
ttI
t
l
[:
[:
T
T
T
I
Source: Classification Standard: Dentistry Scienti{ic and Professional Category Treasury Board of Canada Secretatiat,20lZ. Reproduced with
L.---._
the permission of the Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2012.
I
Chapter
5 | Job-Bued Smtcnrcs
Point Method
LO4
Poiot *.thods have three.o-rnon characreristics: (1) compens"bl. f*.torr, wirh (2) numericdly scaled factor degrees, and (3) weighu reflecting the relative importance of each factor.T Each
jobk relative value, arrd hence its location in the pay suucrure, is determined by the cotal poina
assigned
89
to it.
Point plans are r}re most commonly used approach to esrablish pay sffucrures in Canada
due co pay equiry legislation requirements for rhe evaluadon of skill, ifforr, ,.rporrsibiliry and
working conditions in jobs. They represent a significant change from ranlcing and classifflation
methods in that they make explicit the criteria for evaluadng jobs-compensable factors. The
'Worth box here illustrates
t-he ongoing rnodernization of the classifrcadon qrstem used by
.Net
rhe federal government toward the point method ofjob evaluation described in t}1e nexr scrion.
point method
job evaluation method that
assigns a number of poin6
to each job, based on
compensa bl e factos that
are numerically scaled and
weighted
,@
WEIGHT
FACTOR
Knowledge
Analytical skills
MAXIMUM
NO. OF DEGREES
POINT VA,].U!5
17%
170
J'/o
150
Communication
': r::
lnteraction
skills
lCO
People and
15o/o
operational.
,'.t
managemeni't
15o/d'
tri
t,.''t,t
effort
Sensory
effort
Risk
to
health
I
;
I
I
I
t
I
Work environment
(psychological)
Worken'viicinment ,i
(nhYlicll),,,, .,,',':
:'
Total:
Decision making
Phvsical
.:
'li
ififi
*,:-1*
ll l
t
il
t
1l
Pan
compensable factors
those charactefl3tics of the
work that the uganization
values, that hdp itpursue i6
statey and that achieve ia
objxtives
l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The end product of this design process is a job scucrure that helps darelop and eglain the
Pay $rucnre'
Gonduct Job
Tfpi."lly,
factors,
EXHIBIT
tr
5.7
Chaprcr
2. Determine Gompensable Factors Compensable factors play a pivoral role in the point
olan. These factors refiect how work adds value to the organizacion. They flow from the work
irc.lf .nd from che strategic direction of the business. The four compensable factors required
jn pry eqriry legisladon across Canada are slcill, effort, responsibiliry and working condidons,
tjr.r.for. rhey are present in virrually all Canadian job evaluation pla:ts. Shill refers to the
"nj
experience, raining, abiliry, and education required to perform a job. Subfactors indicative
of rLill -"y include educational levels, years of experience required, technicd knowledge, specializedknowledge or training, interpersonal skills and many others. Efort referc to the physical,
mencal, or ernodond exerdon needed for performance of a job. Common subfacors indude
diversity of tasks, complexity of tas[<s, creativiry of thinking, analydcal problem solving, physical
srrengrh requirements, degree of assistance available, amount of emotion reguladon required,
.and so on. Reqonsibility refers to the extent to which an employer depends on ttre empioyee
ro perform t}re job as expected, with emphasis on the imporcance of job obligation. Subfacors
may include decision-making authority, degree of incegrarion of work with others, abiliry co
oerform tasks without supewision, responsibi.lity for financial (budgets) and human (number of
..ploy.o reporting direct and indirecdy to the position) resources, impact of failure or risk in
*re job, and orhers. The working condirtorr factor is intended to ensure that value is atached to
rhe difficuft or unheahhy aspeca of rhe condirions in whici the work is done. Subfactors can mry
widely, but they often relate to hazards such as expostue to dangerous chemicals o! stress and the
physical suroundings ofthe job such as cramped quarters, outdoor location.
A real-liFe example of compensable facrors and associated subfactors is shown in Exhibit 5.8.
To select compensable factors, an organization asks what it is about the work that adds value.
At the Universicy of Lethbridge, human relarions skills are considered a valuable aspe ct of jobs. As
shown in Exhibit 5.9, rhese skills are defined at tfuee levels: basic, important, or critical.
lo effecc, the Universiry of Lethbridge determined that its competitiue aduanwge depends on
the human relations skills their employees use in their work Hence, the universiry is signalling
to all employees that jobs will be valued on the basis of the nature of the human relations skills
required by those jobs. Jobs that require understanding and motivating people have a higher reladve wonh than jobs that require simple coumesy and effecdve working relationships.
,H
9.t
il
n
il
d
d
t
f
F
F
I
I
I
I
I
E]:,''.'.'::':,...'..'::..'.'':':l.''.'.''''..,.''.E
FACTORS
skill
Effort
,.''..
Responsibility
:'
'
Working conditions
E
h-
with permission.
I
-
92
EXHIBIT
5.9 |
ffi
Human Relations Skills are the active, face-to-face skills needed by a job holdel for various relationships with other
people within and outside of the organization. Human Relations Skills range fFdm "1" (basic), to "2" (important), to
t3" (critical), lt must be kept in mind that "1" is not a "0." lt is assumed that atl jobs require a minimum of common
politeness. At the opposite extreme, a job that requires the ability to motivate, convince, or sell others to gain results
is a "3." Human Relations Skills are noi synonymous with being a nice person and they are not necessarily interchangeable. Level descriptions follow,
EXPLANATION
'1;Basic,
'l
:.
This
is
Maintaining courteous and effective working relationships with others tq request or transmit
ask questions or get clarification.,
informgtioi,
2. lmportant
This level
Skills of persuasiveness or assbrtiveness as well as sensitivity to the other person's pointof view
are often required to influence behavior, change an opinion, 9l tlrn.a situation around. The
requirement?or public contact does not necesgarily_demand this level of human relations skills,
particularly if the purpose is to provide or solicit information-
ln addition, positions which assign work and/or monitor and review work of other employees
(generally sr.ipervising AUPE positions) usually require at least this level of skill.
to be
E.'''|','.'''..''''.'.].]w
Source: Reproduced with the permission of University of Lethbridge, Human Resources Department.
.
.
.
of rhe organization
performed
Based on the work
Acceptable to the stakeholders affected by the resulting Pay strucnue
Based on the strategr and values
The leadership of arry organization is the be5t source of information on ttrateg, and ua[ua of
the otganization, specifically where the businQss should be going and how it is going to ger there'
Clearln leadershipt input into factor selection is crucial. So, for exarnple, ifdre business strategy
involves providing innovadve, high-qualiry products and services designed in collaboration with
customers and suppliers, then jobs with greater responsibility for produd innovation and customer
contacs should be valued more highly. Or if the business suategy is more like Walmartt, "providing
goods and services to delight customers at the lowest cost and greatest convenience possible," then
compensable factors might include impact on cost containment, customff relations, and so on.
Compensable facors reinforce the organizadont culture and values as well as its business
If rlat direcdon
.*'
Chaprcr
5 | Job-Bued Strucnra
andJob Eualuation
93
il
ft
,t
t
For eample, strategic plans ar many companies call for increased globalization.
-.,r also change.
(P&G) and 3M include a "multinational resPonsibilities" factor similar
c"-bt.
&
l'.li*p..r.t
in Exhibic 5.10 in their managerial job evaluation plan. Multinational responsibilities
"". in rerms.of t-h^e rype of responsibiliry, the percentage of time devoted to international
t
I
::;.
*l.n*a
*a
[*.r,
'""--F".,or,
may
Irii"
.h"r .re consistent with
-'-'
**"*..,
based
t
I
I
94
Parr
fuunttfr
wages,
I
I
Although a wide variCry of factors"iii used in standard existing plans, the factors tend to
fall into four generic groups: skill, effort, responsibiliry, and working conditions. These four are
required in pay equity legislacion across Canada . The Hay Guid.e Chart-Profle Method, used by
5,000 employers worldwide, is perhaps the most widely used. The classic three Hay factorsknowhow, problem solving, and accountabiliry-are also commonly used.
A remaining issue to consider is how marry factors should be included in fr. p1"". Some facrors
may have overlapping deffnitions or may fail to account for anphing unique in the criterion chosen. One wrirer calls rhis the "illusion of validity'-we want to believe that the factors are capturing
divergent aspeca of che job and that all are imporant.g
Another problem is cdled'tmall numbers."lo If even qnly one job in our benchrnark sample
has a pardcular characteristic, we rend to use that facsor for the endre work domain. A cornmon
example is working conditions. If even one job is performed in unpleasant working conditions, ir
is tempting to make it a compensable factor and apply it rc all jobs. Once a tactor is part of the
sysrem, orhers are likely ro say cheir job has it, too. For ecemple, office staffmay feel that ringing
relephones or lcakl toner carcridges constitute unpleasalt or hazardous condidons.
In one plan, a senior manager refi.rsed to accept a job evaluadon plan unless some kind
of working condirions factor was included. The plant designer, a recent universiry graduate,
t
T
T
T
showed rhrough sralisdcd andysis *rat working conditions did not vary enough between
90 percenr of the jobs to have a meaningful effect on the resuldng pay sffucture. Nevertheless,
rhe manager rejected this argument, pointing out thar rhe plan designer had never worked in
rhe plantt foundry where working conditions mattered. In order to get the plan and pay decisions based on it accepted by the foundry workers, the plan was redesigned to include working
condidons.
This situation is nor unusud. In one gtudy, a 2l-factor plan produced the same job sffucture
r-har could have been generated using only 7 of the factors. In fact, the jobs could be coruecdy
sloned inco classes using only three facors. Yet the company decided rc keep the 2l-factor plan,
because it was "accepred and doing the job." Research as far back as the 1940s demonstrares that
the skills dimension explains 90 percent or more of the variance in job evaluadon results; three
factors generally account for 98 to 99 percenr of the variarice.l I But, as we have seen, other factors
often are included to ensure the plan's acceptance.
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
Factors Once rhe factors are chosen, scales id.entifring and describing the.differenr degrees within each factor (or subfactor) zue constructed. Each degree may be anchored by
rhe rypicd skills, rasks, and behaviours taken from the benchmark jobs that illus*ate each factor
degree/level. Exhibir 5.11 shows the federal government's scaling for the subfactor "Research
and Analysis Skills" of the factor "Skill" for jobs in che Economics and Social Science Services
3. Scale the
factor degree/level
description of sevenl
dqreel
grouP.
.iE':
Chaptcr
5 | Job-Btd
Se(etariat,2012' Reproduced
source: classification standard: Economics and social Science Services, Treasury_Board of Canada
per;l;;iln of the Minster of Public Work and Government Services Canada, 2012'
'"ithid"
i4.
-*y
loft
*ork is p.rfor*.d
Points
adiisorycommiae.,]11.r[ooro l00percentofrhevalueamongthefaaors.l2Theweighsarethem
used to disuibute the total number of points (which is arbitrarily determined) among the factors.
Then the n'mber ofpoints for each level of each subFacor is determined, as shown in Exhibit 5.12'
factor weights
weighting assigned to each
factor
to reflxt
differences in
Pm
96
EXHIEIT
5.12
I I Intcrnal
Alignna* Deanbi4
&
Jllzatutt
ffi
SUBFACTOR
FACTOR
POINTs
12
16
20
12
16
20
10
10
12
15
Education (20%)
Experience (20%)
Physical
LEVEL 3
skiil (40%)
Responsibility (30%)
POI\ITS
(wElGHT)
Effort (20%)
LEVEL
LEVEL 2
WEIGHT)
effort (10%)
POTNTS
LEVEL
POINTS
LEVEL 5
POINTS
12
15
Hazards (5%)
Weather (5%)
100
rc
To.illustrate the use of the table shown in Exhibit 5.12, coruider the job of !?'eb Designer.
The job might be evaluated at 12 poins for education, 12 points for experience, 2 poinu for
physicd effort, 8 poina for mental effort, 3 points for responsibiliry for safeql 6 points for
responsibility for budget, 1 point for hazards, and I point for weather; thc job would thus be
evduated at 45 poinu. The job of Office Cleaner might be erreluated at 4 points for education,
8 points for enperience, 8 poina for physicd effon, 2 points for mental' effort, 6 points for
responsibility for safery, 3 poinrs for responsibiliry for budget, 3 points for hazards, and 1 poinr
for weather; *re lob would thus be evduated at 35 points.
Contemporary job evaluadon often supplements committee judgment regarding weighrc
with staristical analysis. The commimei recommends the criteion pa! ttruch#e they wish to
duplicate with the point plan. The criterion structure may be the current rates paid for benchmark jobs, market rates for benchmark jobs, rates for predominandy male jobs (in an afiempt
to eliminate gender bias), or union-negotiated rates.l3 Once a criterion strucrure is agreed on,
statisdcal modelling techniques such as regression analysis are used to determine the weight of
each factor that will best reproduce the chosen suucture. The statistical approach is often labelled
poliE capnring to contra$ it to the committce judgrnent epplo^ch. Not only do the weights reflect
the relative importance of each factor, but research clearly demonstrates that the weighs influence the resulting pay structure,l4 Th*, selecting ttre appropriate pay rates to use as the criteria
is criticd. The job evduation result are based on it.15
Perhaps the clearest illustration can be found in the criterion struclrues used in municipali
ties. if only market rates wete used, fireftghters would be paid much less than police. Yet many
'successfully
negotiated a link between their pay and police rates. For
fuefighters' unions have
o<ample, in 2008, Thunder Bay firefighters were awarded wage pariry with the ciry police.l6 The
negotiared pay structure now deviates from a market sffucture.
I
I
t,
I'
t.
t;
I.
l!
I
5. Gommunicate the Plan and Train Users Once che job ev-aluation plan is designed, a manual
is prepared so that ocher people can apply the plan. The manual desiribcs the method, defines
the compensable factors, and provides enough information rc permit usrs to disdnguish varying
degrees of each factor. The point of the manud is to allow users who were not involved in the planb
'denelopment to apply the plan as ia developers intended. Users will require craining on how to
apply dre plaa, and background infornation on how the plan is integrated with thc organization's
toml pay system. An appeals process may a-lso be included so that employees who feel drat their
-'Chapter
h"yg"!y
th.,iq!!\!I}c pal
as
if the
fai@ ot{.-:,9
;;;*,
or other metho&. In some cases,'the cndre job evaluation process is carried out online.
Jobs Recall rhat rhe compensable faccors and weighrc were derived
ApOly to Non-benchmark
jobs.
The final step in the point plan process is to apply the plan to the
of benchmark
"","i'"
a manual is written that describes the method, defines the comusually
do
so,
To
i"1..
G.
o-ot
J,jiJS-f"oo",
"""r"U.
as
LO5
and comIf the inrernal srucnrret prupose is to aid managers, and if ensuring high involvement
the
results
in
a
smke
with
and
employees
rnanagers
*iorr.o, from employees is imponant, dl *rose
cornminees,
to
use
is
approlh
A
common
it.
desigrring
should be involved in the process of
gark for..s, or teanN th.at indude representatives from key operating funcdons, induding nongroups role is advisory
-.rr"goi"l .*ployees. In some cases, the
.Looro compensable factors, and approves all major changes. Organizations with
"riorr"rpp.".tr,
it advantageous to include union representadon as a source of ideas and to help
find
uoionr'oft*
differpromote accptance of the resutts. However, some union leaders believe *rat philosophical
acdve panicipation. They take the position tlut collective bargaining lields more
.qoitrbL resula. As a result, the o<tent of union participation varies. No single perspecdve exisa
enists'
on rh. udu. of acdve participation in the process' just as no single management perspecdve
discussed
members
\Torldat'\7ork
Exhibit 5.13 shows further resulrs From rhe suwey of
earlier. It shows that compensation professionals (i,e., usually compensation analysrs, sometimes
.rr.., pr*.rr,'rh.ir
higher levels such as che compensadon manager) are primarily -responsible for most
job ernJuationslAl*rough that holds tro" fot senior rnanagement_ j+ as_weli it is clear that the
'higher-l*.I
manager is more likely to be responsible for the job evaluadon in this
"o*p.nr".iir
.as.
that gonsultants also play a much larger role here.
"nd
also those at
to
1,1 19 organizations.
Source: World at Work, "Job Evaluation and Mirket-Pricing Practices," February 2009'
97
I
I
t
t
F
t
t
t
t
98
?*l I InumalAligrnnt:
IT
things would have been better ifthey hadAdditiond research is needed to ascertain whether the payofffrom increased participation
offsets rhe potential cost (.g,, time involved co reach consensus, potendal problems caused by
Appeals/Review Procedures
No matteq rhe technique, no job evaluation plan anticipates dl situadons. Ir is inevirable that
will be evaluated incorrectly, or at least that employees and ma4agers may suspect thar
sdme jobs
ttrey were. Consequendy, rwiew procedures to handle such cases and to help ensure procedural
fairness are required, Often the compensation rnanager handles reviews, but peer or team reviews
are increasingly being used. Somedmes these reviews take on the trappings of formal grievarce
procedures (e.g., documented complaints. and responses and levels of approvd). Problems rnay
also be handled by managers and employee relations generalists through informal discussions
with employees.ls
Once the evaluations are completed, approvd by higher levels of management usually is
required. An approvd process helps ensure that any changes that result from evaluating work are
consistenr with the organizationt operations and directions.
Political lnfluences
A recent study found drat more powerfi.rl departments in
the appeals process to change the pay or the classiffcadon of a job than were weaker depanments.l9
This result is consistent with other research that showed that a powerful member of a job'evalu-
arion commitree could sway the results,2o Consequendy, procedures should be judged for their
susceptibiliry rc political influences. "It is *re decision-making process, rather than the instrument
irself that seerns to have the greatest influence on pay outcornes," writes one researcher.2l
rT
The ffnal result of the job andysirjob description-job evduation process is a job sffucrure, a
hierarchy ofwork. This hierarchy translates inro pracrice the employert internal alignment policy,
Exhibit 5.14 shows four hyporherical job suuctures wirhin a single organizadon. These.structures
were obtained via differenr approaches to evaluating work. The jobs are arrayed within four
basic firnciions: managerial, technical, manufacturing, and adminisuarive. The managerial and
.*',=
Chapter
Head/Chief
Scientist
Division General
Managers
Managers
Senior.Associate
'
lcientist,
Associate Scientist
Project Leaders
99
t
t
I
f
I
I
f
t
f
technical and
ad.minisuative strucnues were obrained via a points-based job ev"aluation plan, and
plan
(Chaprcr
manufacnrring
the
plans
person-based
O;
rwo
different
via
work
manufacturing
was
negotiatei
wit!
t_L
Looking back at rhe material that has been covered in the past three chapters (determining interaligiment, job analysis, job evaluation), it is clear that a lot of time and money has beenspent
,o d.vilop ,o-. .o*pio techniques. But it is still not clear how much to pay each employee'
\'/hy botler with all Airl Vfry nor jusr pay whatwer it takes and get on with it?
prior to the widespread ur. oflot Juarion in the 1930s and 1940s, employers had irradonal
pay srrucnues, th. l.ga.y of decenualized and uncoordinated wage-setdng practices. Pay dif,erences were a major source of uffe$ among workers. Employment and wage.records were rarely
kepq only the for.man lcnew with any accruacy how many workers were employed in his dcpan-
,nal
the rates they received. Foremen were thus lfree to manage," often using wage irrforma'
tion to vary the day rate for favoured workers or to assign rhem to jobs where piece rates were loose.
aiot *i
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
100
Panl I
Job evaluation, widr its specified procedures and documentable results, help...d to change
thar, The technique provided work-related and business-related order and logic. At the same
time, the wodd of work is changing, The work of most people now requires that they figure out
whar to do in a given siruarion insread of simply performing a predetermined routine. They must
identify problems and oppomrnities, make decisigls, plan courses of action, rnarshal supponr
and, in general, design cheir own work methods, teihniques, and tools. The challenge is to ensure
that job waluation plans allow for the flexibility to adapr to changing condidons.
Some balance between chaos arrd conuol is reguired. History suggests rhat when flexibiliry
without guidelioes exisrs, chaodc and irradonal pay rates ftequendy result. Removing inefficient
bureaucracy is irnportant, but balanced guidelines are necessary to ensure that employees are
rreated fairly and that pay decisions help the organizadon achieve ia objectives.
Conclusion
The differences in rhe rates paid for different jobs and skills affect the abiliry of managers to
achieve rheir business objectivcs: Differences in pay matter, They matter to employees, because
their willingness ro rake on more rcsponsibiliry and training to focus on adding value for customirnproving qualiry ofproducts, and to be flocible enough to adapt to change all depend at
DifiFerences in the rates paid for
differenr jobs and skills also influence how faidy employees bclieve they arc being treaced Unfair
trearment ultimately is counterproductive'
So far, rhe rnosr common approach to designing pay diffcrences for different worlc has been
er<amined: job erraluation. In dre noc chapter, wc will examine several alternative approaches.
However, any approach must be evaluated according to how well it will help design an internal
pay suuclure rhat is based on rhe work, that will help achieve the business objectives, and that is
ers and
least
Lr
Chapter SummarY
.
.
.
.
.
ofjobs. Different
PersPc-
The ranking rnethod of job eraluadon rank orders the jobs from highe$ to lowest on the
basis ofa global deffnicion ofvalue. Two rnethods ofranking are: (1) alternation ranking, in which
i
I
I
I
I
I
L
l.
T
I
ti
L.
the most- and least-valued jobs are selccted first, then the nent-most- and least-valued jobs, and so
on; and (2) paired comparison, in'which each job is ranked againsc dl other jobs.
The classiffcadon medrod of job evduation uscs dass descriptions to categorize jobs.
Descriptions of benchmark jobs (those that are well known, rclatively stable, and corrmon across
differenr employers) are used as part of dre class descriptions for clariffcadon. The find result is a
series of classes wirh a number of jobs in each.
E,=
Chepcr 5 | Job-BascdStrucnrc andtob Eualuation
;
.
..
.
.
.
ofiS
culuation are:
Conduct joFanalTsis
Deterrnine comPeasable 6ctors'
Scale dre facors'
!fleight tie 6son and o"sign Points'
The three cosrmon characedstics ofpoint plans are compcnsable Gctors, numerically scaled
refccring the importancc of arh factor
facror degrees/lev-els, and weights
Cornminees, task forces, or tnms induding non-Eanagerial employees should be involved
job waluation in an advisoq' or decision-making capacitf. Unioa parricipation may also be
in
desirable.
Key Terms
method
job
classification
compensable factors
alternation ranking
benchmark
degreey'level
weighB
job evaluation
factor
factor
point method
ranking
job structure
Review Questions
1.
How does job evaluation translate internal alignment policies (loosely coupled versus tight
(c) fairness,
fitting) into practice? What do (a) organizational strategy. (b) flow of work,
and (d) motivating employee behaviour have to do with job evaluation?
2.
Why are there different approaches to job evaluation? Think of several employers in your
area (e.g" hospital, Walmar! manufach.ring plant bank, university/college). What approach
would you expect each of them to use? Why?
3.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using more than one job evaluation plan
in any single organization?
4.
Why bother with job evaluation? Why not simply market-price? How can job evaluation
link intemal alignment and external market pressures?
Experiential Exercises
1.
Consider your university or college. Develop compensable factors for your institution
to evaluate jobs. Would you use one job evaluation plan or multiple plans? Should the
school's educational mission be reflected in your factors? Or are generic factors okay?
Discuss. Ask your professor to help you identify the actual factors used (this likely will
involve contacting the HR department compensation staffl.
2.
you are the manager of ten people in a large organization. All become suspicious and
upset when they receive a memo from the HR department saying their jobs are going to
be evaluated. What would you say to try to reassure them?
101
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
102
Case
Job Evaluation at Whole
Foods
.f
Rather than wait until you are next in a supermarket to check out the different types of work,
we brought some of the jobs at Whole Foods to.you. Now that you have some background in
job evaluation, it is time to try it out. As a first step, Whole Foods has conducted job analysis
and prepared job descriptions. The results are shown below. Now a job structure needs to be
worked out, The manager has assigned this task to you.
1,
Divide into teams of four to six students each. Each team should evaluate the nine jobs
and prepare a job structure based on its evaluation. Assign titles to each job, and list your
structure by title and job letter. A broad hint: Remember from our discussion of Whole
Foods' business and pay strategy in Chapter 2 that teams play an important role.
2,
Each team should describe the process the group went through to arrive at that job structure. Job evaluation techniques and compensable factors used should be described, and
the reasons for selecting them should be stated'
3.
Each team should give each job a title and put its job structure on the board. Comparisons
can then be made between the job structures of the various teams. Does the job evaluation method used appear to affect the results? Do the compensable factors chosen affect
the results? Does the process affect the results?
Evaluate the job descriptions, What partswere most useful? How could they be improved?
tob A
KndofWork Provideexcellentcustomerservice-Followandcomplywithall applicablehealthand
sanitation procedures. Prepare food items: make sandwiches, slice deli meats and cheeses. Prepare
items on station assignment list and as predetermined. Stock and rotate products; stock supplies and
paper goods in a timely basis; keep all utensils stocked. Check dates on all products in stock to ensure
freshness and rotate when necesary. Use waste sheets properly as directed. Operate and. sanitize
all equipment in a safe and proper manner. omply with and follow Whole Foods Market Safety
Procedures. Follow established Weights and Measures procedures. Answer the phone and pages to
department quickly and with appropriate phone etiquette. Practise proper use of knives, slicer, trash
compactor, box baler, and all other equipment used during food preparation and cleanup. Perform
other duties as asigned, and follow through on supervisor requests in a timely manner.
Requiremenfr-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
toi p
Kind of Work Assist and focus on customers during entire checkout process. Perform all cash
register functions according to established procedures. Maintain a positive company image
Chapter
groceries
bv providing courteous, friendly, and efficient customer service. Check out customer
professional
demeanour
at
a
PLU
code
test.
Maintain
Pass
entry-level
accurately.
and
eificiently
procedure.
all times. Stock registers with supplies as needed. Follow proper cheque-receiving
journal
Clean, stock. and detail front-end area with special attention to own register. Change
idenof
every
shift
to
produce
department
beginning
at
the
Walk
as
needed.
tapes and ribbon
tify and learn new produce codes. Comply with all posted provincial health and safety codes.
Requirements
a
a
Excellent communication skills necessary for good customer and team relations
Ability to work well with others
Ability to learn proper use of box baler (must be 18 years of age or older)
Desire to learn and grow
Ability to work in a fast-paced environment, with a sense of urgency
Understanding the importance of working as a team
lob
Kind of Work Reports to rtore team leader and to associate store team leader. Provides
overall management and supervision of Prepared Foods Department. Responsible for team
member hiring, development, and termination. Also responsible for profitability, expense control, buying/merchandising, regulatory compliance, and special proiects as assigned. Complete
accouniability for ail aspects of department operations. Consistently communicate and model
Whole FoodJ vision and goals. lnterview, select, train, develop, and counsel team members
in a manner that builds and sustains a high-performing team and minimizes turnover. Make
hiring and termination decisions with guidance of store team leader. Establish and maintain a
positive work environment. Manage inventory to achieve targeted gross profit margin. Manage
ihe ordering process to meet Whole Foods Market quality standards. Maintain competitive
pricing and lchieve targeted sales. Establish and maintain positive and productive vendor relaiionships. Develop and maintain creative store layout and product merchandising in support
of regional and national vision. Establish and maintain collaborative and productive working
relatitnships. Model and cultivate effective inter-department and inter-store communication.
Provide accurate, complete information in daily, weekly. monthly, annual, and ad hoc management reports. Maintain comprehensive knowledge of, and ensure compliance with, relevant
regulatory rules and standards.
Regur'rements
.
.
.
.
.
.
Two years' relevant experience as a team leader, assistant team leader, supervisol or bqter
Thoroughknowledgeofproducts,buying,pricing,merchandising,andinventorymanagement
Excellent verbal and written communication skills
Strong organizational skills
Knowledge of all relevant Whole Foods Market policies and standards
Computer skills
tirh D
Kind of Work perform all duties and responsibilities of Prepared Foods team mernber. Pro.ioe
excellent customer service. Assist team leader in nightly team operations. Repcrt a:' aeorts ci
103
t
I
t
T
t
t
;
F
F
;
;
t
t
I
t
I
I
104
P* I I Intmal /!hgmn* W4
* Sl?eat
team members that violate policies or rtandards to the team leader or associate team leader.
Mentor and train team members. Maintain quality standards in production and counter display.
Comply with all applicable health and safety codes.,!elp implement and support all regional
programs.
Requiremenfs.
.
.
.
.
.
.r
.
.
Joh E
Kind of Work Performs all duties related to dishwashing: unloading khchen deliveries and cleaning all dishes, utensils, pots, and pans. May be prep work. Maintain food quality and sanitation
in kitchen. Maintain a positive company image by being courteous, friendly, and efficient. Wash
and sanitize all dishes, utensilt and containers. Assist with proper storage of all deliveries. Rotate
and organize products, Perform prep work as directed. Provide proper ongoing maintenance of
eguipment. Maintain health department standards when cleaning and handling food. Perform
deep-cleaning tasks on a regular basis. Take out all of the garbage and recycling materials. Sweep
and wash floors as needed.
Requircments
.
.
.
.
.
Entry-level position
tob F
Knd of Work Pertorms all functions related to breaking down deliveries and moving back
stock to floor. Assists in organizing a'nd developing promotional displays; maintaining back
room; training entry-level grocry clerks. Trained and capable of operating any of the subdepartmen8 as needed, Maintains and ensures retail standards during shift. Responsible for
implementing team's break schedule, Performs all duties and responsibilities of grocery team
member. Builds displays and requests appropriatesignage, Supervises shift to ensure standards
are maintained. lmplemenB break schedule for shift. Responsible for problem solving in team
leader or associate team leader's absence. Fully responsible for completion of all opening or
closing checklists. Responsible for checking in deliveries.
Requircments
.
r
E'-
rr'?
Chaprer
5 | Job-Bacd
Struc*res andJob
---r-..-a
a
a
a
Ability
Ability
Ability
Ability
105
Etalzaiot
-_
.:-.1.1
rl
I
I
t
I
I
t
t
;
toh
Kind
and supervision of the Prepared Foods Department. Can be responsible for team member hiring,
development, and termination. Also responsible for profhability, expense control, buying/
merchandising. regulatory compliance, and special projects as a55i9ned. Complete accountability
for all aspectiof department operations. Consistently communicate and model Whole Foods'
vision and goals. Asiist in the interview selection, training, development, and counselling of
team members in a manner that builds and sustains a high-performing team and minimizes
turnover. Discuss hiring and termination decisions with guidance of others' Establish and maintain a positive work environment. Manage inventory to achieve targeted gross profit margin.
Manage the ordering process to meet Whole Foods Market quality standards, maintain competi-
product
tive piicing, and achieve targeted sales. Develop and maintain creative store layout and
collaborative
maintain
and
vision.
Establish
national
and
merihandising in support oi regional
interand produ6ivi working relationships. Modeland cultivate effective inter-department and
annual,
monthly,
daily,
weekly,
in
information
complete
accurate.
Provide
store communication.
and ad hoc management reports. Maintain comprehensive knowledge of, and ensure compliance with, relevant regulatory rules and standards.
Requirements
.
.
.
r
.
.
.
Iob H
whh all store
Kind of Work Rotate.among stores. Assist and suPport the store team leader
functions. lnterview select, evaluate, counsel, and terminate team members' Coordinate and
supervise all store products and personnel. Followthrough on all customer and team member'
questionsandrequests.Evaluatecustomerserviceandresolvecomplaints.Operatethestorein'
.an efficient and profitable manner. Have a firm understanding of store financials and labour
budgets. Establish and achieve sales, labour, and contribution goals. Review department schedules-and research productivity improvements. Order store equipment and supplies in a timely
manner. Enforce established iood safety, cleaning. and maintenance procedures' lnspect store,
ensure cleanliness, visit off-hours for consistency. Maintain accurate retail pricing and signage.
Ensure that product is cross-merchandised in other departments, Coordinate, supervise, and
report physiial inventory. Analyze product transfers,_waste, and spoilage. Manage expenses to
on all equipment
. maximize the bottom line. Provide; maintain, and safety-train team members
ensure
and tools. Resolve safety violations and hazards immediately. Maintain store security and
that opening and closing procedures are followed. Show EVA improvement over a designated
' '':1
:
i l,:. ii
..:
.:i i
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
;
106
&2
Stutw
period. Leverage sales growth to improve store profitability. Assist in handling liability claims
and minimize their occurrence. Establish and maintain good community relations. Create a
friendly, productive, and professional working environment. Communicate company goals and
information to team members. Ensure and support ieam member development and training.
Evaluate team member duties, dialoguet raises, and promotions. Keep regional leadership
informed of all major events that affect the store. Ensure that store policies and procedures are
followed. Visit the competition on a regular basis and riact to current industry trends.
RequiremenF
.
.
.
' .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
' .
. .
loh I
Knd of Work Performs all functions relilted to breaking down deliveries and moving back
stock to floor. May assist in organizing and developing promotional displays; maintains back
room. Stock and clean grocery shelves, bulk bins, and frozen and dairy tase. Maintain back stock
in good order. Sweep floors and face shelves throughout the store. Comply with all applicable
health and safety codes. Provide excellent customer service. Log and expedite customers' special
orders. Retrieve special orders for customers by request and offer service out to car, Respond to
all grocery pages quickly and efficiently. Build displays and request appropriate signage.
Requirements
.
.
.
.
.
.
ffi-
with Connect.
Connect allows you to practise important concepts at your own pace and on your own schedule, with
24[7 online access to an eBook, Practice Quizzes, Study Tools, and more.
f
;
t
F
t
t
the Pyrami&'
job evaluation was in use when the pharaohs built
Hisrorians say fiat.some form of
job
evaluation'
of
tsistance
l;'Gre"t \f^ll construccion with the
Chinese ernperors
**"gJ
Thelogicunderlyingtoday,sjob-basedpaystructuresflowsfromscientificmanagement'champi
steps and analped
,fr. .*fy t iObr. \7o.k *", broken into a series of
by Frederick Tayl",
oned
job (righc
perform-every.element of dre
"
most efficient way-to
besr way"-fte
fiac the
u. specified. su"t.gi. lly, Taylort apploach fit wid'
l.JJ
.orl)]
,hor.l
to
how
down co
done'
,rone
so
mass
tureshoidoutfiatpromise.Thelogicsupportingperson-based^pp.^t:isthatstrucruresbased
agility'
be more ftoiuit and thus encourage
on differences in peopie's il;;;;;p.iJn.ioiiit
chapteq the usefi-rlthe iopic of this. chapter. At the end of this
person-based
o
ness
of the various
"pproo.'t
"r.
"pp..";f];ob-
"na
Pay
strucn''es
will be discussed.
underlying;"|:!*td and people-based
E*hibit 6.1 points our rhe similarities in the logic
is needed co (1) collect and zummarize
approaches. No marter rhe basis for the scruccur., ^-*ry
is oi u"lt'" to rhe organi don' (3) q@rufy
informarion about rhe work, (2) determine what
suucture. The previous wvo c,hapters
that value, and then (a) ranslate that value into internal
This chapter
f". j;;;Jl..r.,oro (job analysis and job evaluation).
discussed
discusses
*re
process
person-based strucures'
I
f
;
t
;
l
I
t
I
I
I
I
il
Purl I IntcnalAlignnnt
108
EXHIBIT 6.1
ffi
Business and Work-Related,r-
lnternal
,/
,/
Job-based
I
PURPOSE
I
Job analysis
Job descriptions
Collect, summarize
work information
Structure
\
r!
Person-based
,/
.
skill
Skill analysis
(Chapter 6)
Core
competencies
(chapter 6)
(chapter 4)
t
t
I
t
Competencies
I
I
,l
Determine what
to value
Job evaluation:
Skill blocks
Competency sets
classes or'
compensable factors
(chapter 5)
I
I
Assess value
I
{
Certification
Competency
weighting
process
lndicators
(Chapter 5)
I
I
Job-based structure
(Chapter 5)
Translate into
structure
,t
Person-based
Person-based
stru(ture
structure
(Chapter 5)
(Chapter 6)
I
I
I
I
t
i
LO1
I_-I
t
I
skill-based pay
structures
link pay to the depth or
Skill-based pay plans are usually applied to so-called blue-collar work and competency-based
plans to ro-.dl"d white-collar work The distinctions tue not hard and fast' However, the majoriry of applications of skill-based pay have been in manufacruring and assembly work where the
be specified and.defined. The advantage of a skill-based pay strucnrre is that people
*ork
can be deployed in a way rhat better matches che flow of work, thus avoiding botdenecks as well
as idle hands.l Struccures based on skill pay individuals for all the skills for which they have been
certifted regardless ofwhether dre work they are doing requires all or just a few ofthose pardcular
skills. By contrast, a job-based plan pays employees for the job to which they are assigned, regard-
*"
Types
l._-..
of Skill Plans
Skill plans can focus on depth (e.g., specialisu in corporate law, finance, or welding and hydraulic
maintenance) or breadrh (gsneralists with knowledgc in all phases of operations including mar'
keting, manufacturinp finance, and human resources).
Chapter
6|
Poson-Bascd Pa1
Specialist Depth The pay.stucnrres fs1 rlmmsT and hig! school teachers are usually based
on rheir knqwledge m"q"ured by cducerbr lenet A ryplca[ qaher's con'a". sPqcifi,e-C a r'rles L
sreps, with each $ep corresponrling rc a lcr=l ef e.frerios- A bachdor's degree in educadon is
srep one and is t-he rnidmum required f61 hirinB To adnnce a $ep to higher pay requires addi.tiond education. For example, the salary scbcdulc indudcd in the case at ttre end of rtris chaprer
requires 15 additional credirs beyond the h-rtrlnri degree rc rnove to a higher srep. Each year
wiri a pay iacreasc- The resulc can be thar two teachers may receive
for
doiag
asentidb
the =-e FLreaching F.nglisf, rc high school students.
rares
pay
different
knowledge
of
the
on
the
individ'ol doing &e job (measured by the number of
is
based
pay
The
universiry crediu and years ofteaching xPcri{:nce) rarher rh:n on job conrent or output (performance of ;tudencs).z The presumprion is .hrt teacbers wirtr rnore knowledge are rirore effecrive
and more flexible-able to teach many gradcs.
of senioriry also is associaced
EXHIBIT
6.2 I
Strlcttru
r09
110
Pafi
I I Intnnzt
Aligrnaat
Darn*'a6 tb e*wt
*ill be paid vrhatever is their h;ghest certification rate. The same approach is used to rain
and certi$ employees ar thc Intermediate andAdvanced levels. A person cenified at the very top
of the suucture, who earns at least $10.50 an hour, might be assigned to any of the tasls in the
sgucn1;e. The advanage to Balzer is workforce flexibility, and hence stafing assignrnents that
can be berer rnatched to rhe worldlow.4 The adranEge to employees is that the more thcy learn,
r!ry
U:$mBaher
be
related to the organization's objectivel and stratery. In practice, howeve6 the "line of
sighf tetween changes in the speciffc work skills (Fundamental to Advanced) required to oPerate
the titanium nitrate ion coarers and increased shareholder renuns is difficult to make clear' In
some sense, we know that these openting skills mamer, but the link to the plant's performance is
arl.tty
,@
Supports
ls Fair to Emptoyees Employees like dre potential of higher pay that comes with learning.
And by encouraging employees to take charge of their own development, skill-based plans may
give them *ore-.ottttol o.'"r their work lives. Howwer, favouritism and bias maiy plry a role in
letermining who gets first crack at the raining necessary to become cenified at higher paying
-Emplol'ea
complain that rhcy are forced to pid< up the slack for those who are out
skill levels.
h"u" not yet been asked to nrle on the legality of wo people doing
for training. And the
"outts
the same task for different (skill-based) pay.
,@
Motivates Behaviour toward 0rganization Obiectives Person-based plans have the potential
to clarify new standards and behavioural er<pectadons. The fluid work assignments that skillbased plans permit encourage employees to take responsibility for the complete work process and
its resula, ,oiah l.rr direction from supervisors.6 Ifless direction from supervisors is needed, then
fewer supervison are likely to be needed. This conclusion was borne out by research at nine manufaauring plants that concluded rhat the number of managers in plana under skill-based paywls
as much i, 5O po""o, lower compared to tradidonal plana.T Having fewer supervisors can result
in substantial l"bo* *ra savings, bur, ofcourse, supervisors carl see this potential consequence
u'=
Chapcer
6|
111
can certainly dalpen their,entfusiasm for skill-based p"y *1 the often related
of *i.rg tg11s and aovintlme decisill rlseo*iltry f1m suqlvisors to -rvorke1.8
;idl, *ti"h
t
I
LO2
g.j
,
depicts rhe process for deterrnining a skill-based structure. Ir begins wirh a skill
which is similar to the task slatements in a job analysis. Related skills can be grouped
block; skill blocla can be arranged by levels into a skill sffucture. To build the srruc-
skill
pro..tt
is needed to describe,
process to I'den-
yd:.,m:
:*,9:,,*d
:killt.,.. *"
6.3 dso identifies the major skill analysis decisions: (1) !flhat information should
g*iriUl
skill analysis
+igdziitrc
be
1$7h.o
should be involved? (4) How usefirl are
(2) \(rhat methods should be used? (3)
".ed?
are
exacdy
the
same
decisions
These
managers face in job analysis.
resulcs for pay purposes?
assigns points and groups skills as foundation, core elecdves, and optional electives:
Foundarton
':.
it
:,itat ot*.fo, .:"h":.iT'.'-T'.
in Exhibit 6.4.
St
P:Fn.d
($tZ
core
40
elecrive points
hour),
per
Ii
Technician
to-reactr
ll
iddidon to rhe foundadon competencics. To
reach Technician
III,
as mastering
s earn
SKILL
ANALYSIS
SKILL
BLOCKS
.+
SKILL
CERTIFICATION
BASrC DECtSTONS
.
I
.
.
t
;
lnformation to Collect?
.i;
.,
..>
I
I
I
I
112
sr
Fl-=PP'PRR3H9" B
t
I
t
r
I
+.E
-IEHErEEt,sHgEF
*l+EgegEEF
EEE
EE =
Et,egg
?
s lt;=,sEf;gs;ns8 #s'Fss':E
re'-*
EqsEEg: !
*
H
EgFEEFE
En=_Sflt+,*
=*1e33--E-.==-Rp
ls P *E -.E
FIEtfEEEH
*l$tEaf+qEEEE, !g!Eg55g5
lHffi5gqqttP':#
le;;;*Er;=*!i
.
c)
J
rt
o
.
t
',o'
:.
Hl;
F;i
.rr1 .:a:.t-.1.
ia (U.
..':
H...$.fi.,
Oo
..
.i
iF.
.'c
...(!
.E
'
i...1 10J
:rl
H>
,J.
'',:i
:rilL,
'C,
c=-
,'p.$'
.lr
a
-o
m .)a fl.
, . o-j:
0)
(n
!
g,E
'5
'o
t!,
Oo
mI
P
o,
:ct' ,
' .c,.
Ol
..:!:r
" rE1
.:.:E..i
a
=
tr
.g
.9
:.'. C.l:
-.o
"r'lll
tr
.C,
F.
C]
-c
U-
(J
II
ul
o
Itl
+
o
q
,n
oo
oo
NF
{r+
o
tn
o
&
Chapar
6|
Whom
to lnvolve?
Ernployee involvemcnt is almct ahrays built iato skilLbased plans. Employees are the sources
of information for dcfning 1f,s -clcilL, arranging them-irrtoia hierarchy, bundling them into skill
blocla, and cenifying rfieder a person acn"rally possesses the skills. Ar Balzer and FMC, a commiree compossd 6f managers &om several sircs developed, wir-h input from employees, tle skill
Iisring and cerdfication proccss fss Frh of rhe four skill ladders.
Sat
*y
irroFessionals employed
i.1one-of tl're
113
114
Palt
I I In*nalAlig,wat Mn@
fu
Snatttuc
cenfid
at the highest pay levds. As a result, the employer may have an average wage higher than compedtors who are using conventiond job evaluation. Unless the increased floribiliry peffniEs leanet
staffing, the employer may also experience higher labour cos$. Some employers are combafting
this by requiring that employees stay at a rate for a gnain lengh of rime before they can nke the
taining to move to a higher rate. Motorola abandoned irs skill-based plan, because, at the end of
tfuee years, evryone had topped out (by accumulating *re necessary skill blocks). TRS( too, found
that after a fewyears, people ar cwo manufacturing plants on skill-based rysrems all had rcpped out
They were flocible and well rained. So now what? tVhat happens in rhe next years out? Does everybody autornatically receive a pay increase? In a ffrm with labour-intensive producs, the increased
Iabour costs under skill-based plans may dso become a source of competidve disadvanrage Overall,
consultingsuweys show that rhe percentage of firms ruing skill-based pay has been declining,la and
a recenr sudy concluded that despie ir advanmges, skill-based pay is underutilized.l5
So what kind ofworkplace seems best suited rc a skill-based plan? Early longitudinal research
on skill-based plans found that about 60 percent of the companies in their original sample were
still using skill-based plans seven years later. One of the key factors that derermined a plant success wlrs how urell it was aligned with the organization's suategy, Plans were more viable in organizations following a cost-cutter strategy (focusing on operational efficiency-doing more with
The reduced numbers of highly trained, flexible employees chat skill-based pay promises fit
this suategy very well. 16
A find quesdon is whether a "jack of dl trades' might really be r-he master of none. Some
research suggests that the greatest impact on results occurs after just a small amount of increased
flexibility.lT Greater increments in flexibiliry achieve fewer irnprwemenm. So more skills may not
necessarily irnprove producdvity. Instead, there may be an optimal number of skills for any indi
vidual to possess. Beyond that number, productivity renuns are smalJer than the pay increases.
Additionally, some employees maF not be interested in giving up the job they are doing. Such
"campers" creare a bordeneck for rotating other employees into thar position to acquire those
skills. Organizations should decide in advance whether they are willing ro design a plan to work
around carnpers or force them into the system.
The bottorn line is that skill-based approaches may be only short-term iniciatives for specific
senings. Unfonunately the longitudinal study did not repon on ttre 40 percent of cases in wfuch
skill-based pay did not survive beyond six years.
less).
competencies
undeding, broadly appliable
knovvledge, skills, and behaviours that form the foundation for successful wo*
performance
LO3
competency-based pay
structure
links pay to work-relatd
comptencieis
l
r
I
I
I
L_,__
'lfhile skill-
Core competencies are thosc that form the foundadon for successfirl performance at all jobs
rhe organizadon. They are often linked to mission staremen$ that o<press an organization's
philosophy, vdues, business strategies, and plans.
Competency sets begin to translarc each core competency into action, For the core competency
of "business awareness," for erample, competencysea might be related to organizational understandirig, cosr managernent, third-party relationships, and abiliry rc idenrifr business opportunities.
Competency indicators are the observable behaviours rlat indicate the level of competency
within each set. These indicarors may be used for staffi.ng and evaluation as well as for gay purposes.
TRWi cornpetency model for im hurnan resource managemenr deparrment, shown in
Exhibir 6.6, includes the four core competencies considered crirical to the success of the business. All HR employees at TR'!Z are expected to demonstrate some level of these competen'cies.
spef,jific components of a
I
core competencies
competency sets
IT
competency
competency indiiators
obseryab le be haviou rs that
indicate the levelof ampetency with i n each co m pe-
tenq
set
in
Chapter
6|
coREJcoMPETENcYcoMPETENcYCoMPETENCY-BA5ED
+
irutiildion'i' +
sEri---
115
PAYsTRUcTURE
coMpErENcrEs
BAslc DEClsloNS
.
,.
ff
ffi
"*tv
?'.:.f...-.1
."-b'
ffi
,ri"n\
;
;
o'q;'
.y_^be_^Or.
N'x)
-$Y^io
' ol- otr'
f;:k
'9 '
's-3
"fp.a"fia"i+$"r")5
-o.t9;lo^8-;o$
-(o-6oit^.:1*-..rf
J "e :\a"^,tt-
ea'
."{^tr)
$f .$o'r+
+A- -a\ ^{tr 6\t Ss
pe'r*1-.rLsls"
ru
---ii$"'-;"i(
t
I
;
I
;
116
=
be -rryected ro reach the highest level in all competencies. Rather, tlre
'
it possessed all levels of mastery of all the core competencies
HR function would wanr to b.
use the model as a guide to whatTRV
individuiemployeeswould
and
group,
HRM
widrin its
values and what capacides it wancs people to develop'
th. degrh of a competency required at each level of
indicarors
However, nor
dl would
,*.
-- ii. .o*p....r.y
"*hot
.o*pl.*i.y of th. *ork. Exhibit 6.7 shows five levels of competency indicators for a generic
.o*p.,.rr.y called "Impact and Influence." These behavioural anchors make the comPetency
,ooli
"o".r.*.
p*** ro influence"
,iiri
J*r*if
*p."JJa. S*f.d
"o-p"rlrr.y
colpensable factors, discussed in pievious
of
chapters'
"lmpactandlnfluence"isoneofthecompetenciesconsidered"mostcritical'"
COMPETENCY INDICATORS
.'
.quotespolicyandissuesinstruction':.'''
.
.
.
.
..
.- Triesldifferent tactics when attempting to perzugde.without neceslarily
t" the ieveior ihprest of an audience (e's" makins
r;H;;;+i;".t i"
21
.....:
.'.:j
#;;;r;
.'
4: lvlultiple actions
.
.
.
Looks
''
detecting
Demonstrates sensitivity and understanding of others_in
to
concerns, inierests, or emotions, and uses that understanding
Jevetoir e-ffective responses to objections
;;";il"g
by
.1.
'
.
.
l,
r.
"liiJt
aiguments or points in a discussion)
different
:
to influente
Uses
Appeals
I
il
l!
ll
l
t_
Chapter
6|
Pmon-Based
Defining ComPetencies
competencies are ffylng to get at what underlies work behaviours, rhere is a lot of fuzzines ia defining them. Early conceptions of competencies focused on ffve areas,lS
Because
l.
.,
3.
4.
5.
As experience with competencies has grown, organizations seem to be moving away from
of self-concepts, traits, and motives. Instead, thcy are puming greater emphasis
on business-related descriptions of behaviours that excellent performers exhibit much more
consisrendy than averagc performers, Competencies are becoming "a collection of observable
behaviours (not a single behaviour) that require no inference, assumption, or interpretation.'
rhe vagueness
Purpose
Do competencies help support an internally aligned srructure? Using thc by-now-familiar yardstick How well do competencies suppo$ the organizationi suategy and workflow, trear employees furly, and direct their behaviour toward organizarion objectives?
,..
:
,
Strategy Frito-Lay, which has used competency-based suucrures for over ten
four competencies for managerial work:
Organization
years, lists
1.
Leadingfor rcsulx: lJsinginitiative and influence with orhers to drive resula and promote
condtruous improvement
Building workforce effectiumesr: Coaching individual development and building capability of
operationd, project, or cross-funcdonal teams to achieve business rezults
t. Lnnaging
4.
technical and business slsterrzs: Acquiring and applying a depth and/or breadth
knowledge, skills,
eirperience to achieve functiond excellence
Doing it the ight way: Modelling, teaching and coaching company vdues
of
-4
Workftow
Competencies are chosen !o ensure drat all the britical nee.l* of 6c orqlniurdro
it is common practice to write: "These slrill." 31s considcrod imporrrnr 6r
all professionals but the weighting of imporrance and the lwel of proficiency varicr
positions, organizations, and business condidons." \)(b.ere skill-based plans are tighdy
to today's work, competencies apply rnore Ioosely to work requiring morc ecit h-di.+
stated) knowledge and behaviour such as in managerial and professionzl *ud.
arc met. For enample,
'-'
;
i
,
'.
;'
fr dftrtrr
o.'--l
- -.
D & t"F
-df*
IE &il arqF p&-
petencies
Pq Smrcnrs
117
I
I
118
Panl I
1.
.
.
.
t
t
t
2.
I--
issues and
i
, .
.
.
.
.
.
3.
optimism
Self-regulation
Social judgment skills
Empathy
.
.
.
t
t
I
I
Self-awareness
I
I
Smcure
A Finnish researcher, Tiina Jokinen, reviewed- and integrated numerous previously suggested frameworks of global leadership competencies. Her work concluded that there
tbe
I
I
Dcunining
Intcrnal Alignmcat:
Social skills
Networking skills
Knowledge
A Review and
Source: Adapted from T. Jokinen, "Global Leadership competencies:
pli*rion,"'.ro, rnal of European lndustrial Training 29(3) (2005), pp' 199-216'
0biectives
iioi, in rhese
r-n
comPrcncy_-based strucThe bottom part of Exhibit 6.5 shows dre basic decisions in creating a
the
objective of the plan'
clarifr
to
is
imponant,
the
most
far
by
and
decision,
first
ture. The
Chaptcr
6|
Pmon-Based Pa1
Strc*res
119
II
objective
been poinred ou! rhar one of rhe
,-hu ayady
pifalls oFcornpetency
systems is
trying to do too
^j"* Ai"*t wirh ill-suited q/srems. Competencies may have value for personal development
organization direcrion. However, the vagueness and subjectiviq (lfhat
lJ'-*l*icating
"oi"rl, u, this persont motives?) continue to make competencies
+ry foundation for a pay
"
of
the competency sets and
on
virtue
may
orist
paper
by
ilr.*."" The comperency structure
limle connection rc tlre work employces do'.In
"ol*Tr'
only way to gct people to pay attention to them. So the
the
is
competencies
ing for
perhaPs Pafng
analysis to clarify the purpose of the cornpetency system.
r; tJconduct
tirr-,,lri
" "o-p"t"o.y
l.
pmonal characteristics: These have r:he aura of the Boy Scouu about them: trusrworthy,
lolal, courreous, In business senings, ttre relevant characeristics rnight be persond integriry,
maruriry of judgmenr, flecibiliry, and respect for others. Employees are ocpected to come in
dre door
with
in increasingly
Z.
-3.
competency analysis
a systematic procss to
identify and coilert iniiormation about ihe cornpetenobs
iI
rquired forsuccadulwo*
performance
I
iI
t
;
;
dgvelop
Becaur" they stem from each organization's rnission $atestent or irs suategr to achieve compedtive advantage, it might be conduded that r.he core competencies would be unigue to each
not. One andpis showed rhat most,organizations aPPear to choose
.o*p*y. In faci, th"y
competencies (see Exhibit 6.tO7.zs So if rhe competencies do not
from thi same list of 20
"ot"
differ, how can they be a source of competitive advantage? Vhat does aPPear to differ among
related
1 organizacions is the way in which rhey operationalize competencies. This parallels an issue
1 to-r,."t.gyr
It
is the
differ.
actions
rnay
the
but
in
the
words,
There rnay be only slight differences
'.acrions
llVhom
.
Jr.a
"r.
to lnvolve?
Like campensable facors, cornpetencies are derived &om the ocecutive lcadershipt beliefs about
rhe organization and its straregic inrent. Howwer, anccdoul evidence indicates that not all
employees understand that conneccion. Employees at one bank iasisted that processing studetrt
tuirion loans was a different competency from proccssing auto loans. The law department at
Polaroid generated a lisr of over 1,000 cornpeteocies they felt were unique to the law depaf,tment
and thar created value for the organization-
t
I
I
t
,l
:T
-.
Chaptc
6|
Pmot-Bascd
Pq
Struc*res
121
o Respects, values. and leverages other customs, cultures, and values. Uses a global management team to better
understand and grow the total business. Able to leverage the benefits from working in multicultural environments.
. Ootimizes and integrates resources on a global basis, including.manufacturing, research, and businesses across
countries, and functions to increase 3M's growth and profitability.
.
.
Actively stays current on world economies, trade issues, international market trends and opportunities.
EXHIBIT 6.1O
The Top
20 Competencies
E
Concern
iI
ii
f
for quality
lnitiative
lnterpersonal understanding
Customer-service orientation
lnformation seeking
Analytical thinking
Conceptual thinking
Self-control
Self-confid'ence
Business
iI
ri
Achievement orientation
orientation
ru
Source: P. K. Zingheim. G. E. Ledford, and J.R. Schuster, "Competencies and Competency Models," Raising the 9ar: Using Competencies
Enhance Employee Performance (Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association, 1996).
j
;
iI
Exhibit 6,1I shows one of rhe eight competencies used by a major toy cornpany for the marketing depanment, Other depanments have sepaxate competencies. Notice the mind-numbing
level of detail. AJthough this approadr may be usefr.rl for career development, it is doubtfuI that
dl this informadon is usefirl, much less necessary, for compensation purposes, The initial promise
of simpliciry and flexibiliry in person-based systems remairu unfulfilled.
to
I
I
;
122
,!-
:'8
* Snan
s g*
EE -scF
EE!
Es.
(,
o|
s?lE #F'B
tg; ,i;e g
!t tfr:f Fl e,
E
g)
g-
ciE s
'6
o,*
cv
taC
g(6
FaFgaIEgEg;;fgFEEE
.\6
Y6
3E
s9
.U
.E
oP U
.=-I
EE
5Ui
-CG
6YE
OJE'c
sr
r
EE
do- I
lEl
IJJI
tLl
.!rro
q E- o
.b i!! r',|
?o bH.E
trcL->
l(Il
I o-l
lol
Lol
Il.clol
I3e
aaa
lEl
I-\ZI
lLl
gEi ggi
lgglig, igtggI
gg*
egi
E+g
l(ol
l?l
lol
l;l
ts
o
o.
o.
(J
- g ggaEEia
..9
E
lEl
lol
lEl
lEl
lol
6A
tn
u
9d
(JE
'E
lgg
d.
i;gt igii
ggi'
igg lg
aLO
\o
qG
6E 6
E EgE'
e*A#
3
s9;
U HbS'
uEhh
EJ
e;tE
E
A;r
r'oEF
l;l
lrl
t fu ct tetg i'. * t
)iUL
lEl
lil
L-l
igigig
uc=tr
In*^
F nr9E'
h .{E-E'
c .=';
'
Ei
giiigi'tiiiiEEislggl
gg
ig
2..:
Chaprcr
6|
Pmon-Based
Methods
Establish Certification
plan is that employees get paid br the relevant skills or compbut not necessarily the ones chey use. Shll-bsd plans assume that possessto match workflow wifi $afing levels, so whether or not an
ine rhese skills will rnake it easier
Liiuid"al is using a panicular skill on a particular day is oot an issue. Competenry-based plans
are used all the dmd The assumptions are not clear.
assume . . . what? Thar all competencies
that
when people are paid on rhe basis of their comperequiremenr
the
however,.is
\Vhat is clear,
to
demonstrate
or certify to dl concerned that a person posscsses
way
be
some
must
rency, rhere
discuss
competencies as .compadble with 360-degree
W'hile
consultan*
competency.
of,
.harlevel
they
are
quiet
about how to objectively certify whether a
development,
pcrsonal
and
feedback
possess,
Person Possesses
a comPetency.
Recall that internal pay suucnues are describcd in rerms of rhe number of
criteria on which the job suuctrre is based Ia pracdce, comperencybased structures generally are designed wirh relatively few leveLFfop5 16 si1-311d relatively
wide differenrials for increased flexibiliry. A generic structure based on four levels would look as
Besulting
Structure
follows:
LEVEL
PHASE
TITLE
Expert
Advanced
Coach; Leader
Resource
Contributor; kofessional
Prof icient
Associate
Such a generic job structure could be applied to almost arryprofessionalwodq even r.he work
of universiry faculry. Consequendy, internal alignment using competencies appcars looseb' lhked
ro the organizationt suatery.
Pq Sfi.@E
123
I
PartI I Intrrnal Akg,n
124
e s g '-t
cf
;
5 p P
t
kbcEso
;'EE'
iE E
v.6 g
IE E
g
!
E h I
8
E
g'
JE'8F q
E
E
3
"b
g =; ,E
E
e
E
.E ! f
d E"
igelfi
E'
fid
uHE a q
Ee EB $
; B f;.gF cr rsEuf !
Z ,<
!-66
-r'
.E
Ir
-JL
;Eg
q:o
!, ;tEt,
"'d
p tin {E ;rl
gE
.a
En
P-:g
u
;o Pi*
o;'; > j
'E
!g
f;
E
gEi
t
6
E
ci
E
'E
.8fr
f F
i9" Ep
H+
:E<
cra:
^
F';
H U
:61
(,
OOFP
EE;9
.> c
Eb+$
g8E
*$:E
Fs
e ii
g$
_ccE
-c B.9
;E
s': E:c.q
.G'.,'
EUE
EEq
igE
nl.EF
d.o
q.ts F
J,:
PE ';c
E.o
iEF
tu6
u-
il
t 't
i>d-u
HEs
9"E"
gEYF
=(oo
gA (6
5
T'
e+.b iE- E#E
=* 6o
-ct
:.iEg,! g
6q'Eh
EE
q._=bg .Jiu tl o (, F Egl
"i !..G
-do
o);
r Ei$f g$i:
g
'*+ 5
Pd
b.!
9N
6ts
gO
E .96
i! .=
BI
CE
vg EF8P *:-;
=
;gE-E et+EE;
to
g*
a Fg;+ ':.5 Est H troa;
ce
':(!
LL>lb
.:9
q
'l
EBg$$
g:
;eEtr
H BEE g
g*E*
:frt
FiF'Ec, EF*
ffi
EE*
.yIll i
Efif F.
f;5: ,
9pFs
IEHF
rqi ; :E;;E
.EgE Es EBeb
;;; $
E:
39.= Eg
6g g6JJ
F;E.E
S::os
-uig
Ed--.6-:
jEg E =ii5q,
qiE;;
EiFE#
gE E; $
Fc
:s
;# E:
,#
B'x 'F
.E
d. Y
tr+i
8-8E e g
.#
4il
lC
'iH
Erg
r!
JP
!t'
i
{t
il
ol
.E
l-6
FA
zer'*
s'ov
=(u?t
!1'ctlc
Lt=r(!
Ll(l'c
=v.BE
q
irr
!t
iltoq
4J6
o:
L,N
crg=
:;l-6q
Efr
o.c1
H
;.c'tr r
gErgEEE**
E)
El
V.
Ft
u
o
x
o
(!
atoau
ctl
Hs.i,
EEE
!
8.89.
ml+
.s
tr)
tr
E
L
ol
go
'a
OE
vt
!o
o-
':bd:
ci
F E E s
1A
eP
9r.,
:E
tl
6'g
ro
;'.i
(!
o
rl.
gEg*F$
:'
cd
iEEEEj
Chaper
6|
_l.r.nci.r/p.tformance relationship for managers, and it found that managers' competencies were
i'
underutilized.32
plan is designed, a crucial issue is the fairness of its managcmenr. Details of the plan
should be described in a manud that indudes dl information necessarl to apply the plan, such
as deffnitions of compensable factors, degrees, or details of skill blocks, competencies, and certiffcation merlods. Increasingly, online tools are available for managers to learn about these plaas
and apply rhem.33
hployee acceptance of the process is just as important here as for job analysis and job evaluation.
In order to build this acceptance, communication with all employees whose jobs ,ue p.ur
',
ofrhe process used to build the pay srnrcrure is required.
LOA
126
with laws and regulations. Any vdue added by job Evaluadon (e.g., reducing pay dissatificdon,
improving employees' understanding of how their pay is determined) has been largely ignoredl
contrast, research on person-based structures tends to focus on their effecs on behaviours and
organization objecdves and ignores questions of reliabiliry and validiry.
ln
't-
reliabilicy and vdidiry of the results obained this way have not been studied.
Validity/Usefulness
Validity refers to the degree to which ttre cv'aluadon assesses what it is supposed to-the relative
worth of jobs to the organization. Vdidity of job oraluation has been rneasured in two ways:
(1) by agreement, rhat is, the degree of agreement between rankings that resulted from the job
evaluation compared to an agreed-upon ranking of benchmarks used as the criterion; and (2) by
"hir rates," thar is, the degree to which'the job eraluation plan matches (hits) an agreed-upon
ranking or pa)' structure,for benchmark jobs. In both cases, the predetermined, agreed-upon
ranking or pay srmctrue is for benchmark jobs. It can be esablished by organization leadenhip
or be based on orternal market dan, negotiations with unions, or the rnarket rates for jobs held
predominandy by men (to try to elirninate any general discrimination reflected in the market),
or some combination of these.
Many studies repon that when fifferent job eraluation plans are cornpared to each other,
they generate very sirnilar nnkings of jobs but very low hit rates-they disagree on how much
to pay the jobs.37 One study that looked at three different job evaluation plans applied to the
same set of jobs reponed similar rank order among evaluators using each plan, but substantial
differences in dre resultingpey,3s
So it is clear that the definition ofvalidiry needs to be broadened rc include impact on pay
decisions. How the resulis are judged depends on the standards used. For managing compensation the correct standard is the pay structue-what job holders get paid-rather than simply
the jobs' rank order.
Srudies ofthe degree to which different job evaluation plans produce the same results surt
with the assurnption that if different approaches produce the same resule, then those results
rnust be 'cor!ect," that is, valid. But in one study, three plans all gave the same result (they were
t"li"bl.), but all three ranked a police officer higher than a detective. They were not valid.39
\Zh.at accounts for rhe reliabiliry of invalid plans? Either rhe compensable frctors did not pick
up something deerned imponant in the detectives' jobs or the detectives havi{hore powr to
negotiat higher wages. So while these three plans gave the same results, they would have litde
acceptance among detectives'
t
----j--
*._
Chapter
6|
Penon-Bascl
Pq Stuctura
AccePtabilitY
and irnprove employee acceptabiliry. Al obvious one is to indude
who believe their jobs are evaluated incorrecdy should be
"
and/or
skills
reevaluadon. Most ftrms respond to such requesc from
re-andysis
.bl. tb t.quor
the process rc all employees, unless those employees are represented by
extend
few
but
nanagers,
have negotiated a griwance process.4l Another approach is to use employee artitudc
*anl
to asscss their perceptions of acceptabiliry.
are used
Several devices
to
assess
*t"
surveys
1'
,
'
'
,
not.4
second porendd source of bias affecs job ev-aluation indirecdy, through the current
wages paid for jobs. In rhis case, job evduation resula may be biased if the jobs held predominantly by women are underpaid. If this is the case, and if the job evaluation is bascd on thc currenr wes paid, then the job evaluadon results simply mirror any bias in the current pay rates.
Considering that many job evaluation plans are puqposely strucured to mirror the existing pay
strucrure, ir should nor be surprising that the current wages for jobs influence the resulrs of job
Th.
evaluation. One study of 400 compensation specialisa reveded that market data had a subsundally larger effect on pay decisions than did job ev-aluadons or current pay dza.as This study is
a unique look at severd factors rhat may affect pay structures. Several recommcndations seek to
ensure that job evduation plans are bias-fue, including rhe following:
1.
.t
I
2.
t3.
Deftne the compensable factors and scales to include the content ofjobs held predominantly
by women. For ocample, working conditions should indudc the noise and stress of office
machines and the repedtive rnovements associated with the use of computers.
Ensure that factor weights are not consisrcndy biased against jobs held predominandy by
women. fue facors usually associated with these jobs always given less weight?
Apply rhe plan in as bias-free a manner as feasible. Ensure that the job descriptions are biasfree, occlude incumbent names ftom the job evduacion process, and train diverse evaluators.
At the risk of poindng out rhe obvior:s, dl issues concerning job evaluation dso apply to
borh skilt-based and competency-based plans. For erample, the accepabiliry of the results of
skill-based plans can be studied from the perspective of measurement (e.g., rcliabiliry, validity)
and administration (e.g., cosrs, simpliciry). The various points in skill cerdfication at which
enors and biases may enter into judgment (e.g., different views of skill-block deffnitions, potential favouritism toward ceam members, deffning and assessing skill oStolo"tnce) and whether
skill-block poinrs and evaluators make a difference all nccd to bc srudied. In light of the detailed
bureaucracy rhat has grown up around job eraluarion, we conffdendy predict a growth of
LO5
127
124
Pan
I I b*rnal
/l&gntftzt
futaA*g
&c Sauctta"
d.**:::strucnues
r-T
Exhibit 6.13 conuasts job-, skill-, and competency-based approaches. Pay increases are gained
via promotions ro more responsible jobs under job-based structures or by acquiring more rtalued
skills/competencies under person-based suuctrues. Logicdly employees will focus on how to get
promoted (e.g., experience, performance) or on how to acquire ttre reguired skills or competencies (e,g., training, learning).
EXHIBIT
6.13
Contrasting Approaches
ffi
ffi
What is valued
Quantify the value
'
Mechanisms to trdnslate
.
.
.
Pay structure
Pay increases
Managers'focus
Compensable factors
Factor degree weights
Assign
point that
.
.
.
into pay
Based on
job
.
.
Promotion
to
Link employees
work
Promotion and
placement
'
Skill blocks
Skill levels
market
performed/market
.
.
COMPETENCY-BASED
SKILL-BA5ED
JOB-BA5ED
.
.
.
.
certified/
.
.
.
r
Competency
levels
Based on competency
Skill acquisition
Competency development
Provide training
opportunities
Coritrdl costs via certification
and assignments
Seek competencies
Provide competency-developing
Employee focus
Procedures
Advantages
Seek promotions
to
Seek skills
. Job analysis
. Job evaluation
. Clear xpectations
. Sense of progress
. Pay based on value of
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Continuous learnirig
Flexibility
Reduced workforce
.
.
.
.
.
Continuous learning
Flexibility
Lateral movement
Potential bureaucracy
Requires costs controls
.
r
Potential bureaucracy
Requires cost controls
Skili analysis
Skill certification
Competency analysis
Competency certification
work performed
Limitations
rc
T
Potential bureaucracy
Potential inflexibilitY
developed/market
assignments
Competencies
Chaprer
6|
Pmon-Bzscd
either coFtrol the rate at which cmployees can cenify skill/competency mastery or employ fewer
people, che organization may experience higher labour costs than competitors using job-based
The key is to offset the higher rates with greatcr productiviry. One consuldng firm
"ppio""h.r.
.i"ims th"t atr average company switching to
and bias.
This chapter condudes our section on internal dignment. Before moving on to externd
consideratioru, lett once again address the issue: So what? SThy bother with a pay structure? The
answer should be: because it supporcs improved organization performance. Arl intemally aligned
(1) help
.. pay srrucrure, whether strategically loosely coupled or tighdy fitting can be designed to
i derermine pay for the wide variety ofwork in the organizations and (2) ensure ttrat pay influences
peoples' attirudes and work behaviours and directs them toward organization objectives.
fl
i::l
..\
Gonclusion
This secdon of the book started by examining pay suuctures witlin an organization to ensrue
that jobs/people that add more value to the organization will be paid more than jobs/people that
:. add les value. The importance put on internd dignment in the pay structures is a basic suategic
. issue. The premise underlying internal dignment is lhat internal pay structures need to be aligned
with the organizationt business sffategF and values, *re design of the workflow, and a concern
for the fair rreatmeor of employees. The work relationships within a single organization are an
important part of internal alignment. Suucnrres acceptable to the sakeholders affect sadsfacdon
with pay, the willingness to seek and accept prornodon to more responsible jobs, the effort to
keep learning and underrake additional training, and the propensiry to remain wirh the employer;
"'
they also reducc the incidence ofpay-related grievances.
The techniques for establishing internally aligned structures include job analysis, job evaluadon, and person-bascd approaches for skilUcompetency-based plans. Although viewed by some
fuy Strucaaa
129
130
Part
I I M'lfunt
as bureauaatic burdns, rhesc rcchniques can aid in achieving the objectives of the pay qrsrcrrl
when tbey are propcrty designd and managed. lTithout them, the pay objecdves of improving
competitiveness and 6imgs are more difficult to achieve.
.Pan I of this book has now been completed. Suategic perspecdves on compensation, the key
straregic issues in compensation management, and qfe totd pay model that provides a framework
for the book have been discussed Managing compensation reguires creating the pay system ro
support the organizadon strategies, its culture and values, and the needs ofindividual employees.
The internal dignment of the pay strucnue, the techniques used to esrablish alignrnent, and the
effects on compensadon objecdves have also been considered, The noct Part focuses on the ner<t
suategic issue in our pay model-orternal competitiveness, including the critical decision on
basic rates of pay for either jobs or skill/compercncy lwels.
n
1.
Ghapter Summary
Skill-based pay plans and competency-bascd pay plans are conceptually idencical, but skills
are very speciffc and competencies are more general. Skill-based pay plans are usually applied
to blue-collar jobs and competency-bascd plaru to white-collar jobs.
The four basic steps in skills andysis are (l).decide what information should be collected,
(2) decide whatmethods should be used to collect che information, (l) decide who should be
involved, and (4) eruure that the resula are usefirl for pay purposes by establishing certifica-
tion methods.
The term comPetenE means the underlying, broadly applicable knowledge, skills, and
behaviours that form the foundation for successful work performance at any level of job
in the organization. Core competencies are competencies that are linked to the mission
sraremenr that ocpresses the organizationt philosophy, values, business strategies, and
plans. Competency sets translate the core competencies into speciffc actions. Competency
indicators are the observable behaviours that indicate the level of cornpetency in each com4.
Pe[ency set.
Employee acceptarce is crucid for person-based plans, beiause it is the key to employees
perceprions of fairness regarding the pay smrdrue. Comrnunication with employees during the building of the structure is the most important step to employee acceptance. Other
important actions to enhaace acceptabiliry are a formal appeals process, employee attirude
surveys, and audiu ofthe pay plan.
Two possible soruces of bias in internal pay strucnrxes are (1) bias in the job eraluadon of
traditionally female-dominated jobs and (2) bias inlcurrent wages that may be perpetuated
when job evaluation plans are suuctured to mirror ecisting pay rates.
Key Terms
competencies
competency analysis
compeiency-based pay
structure
t_
ompetency
competency
indicators
sets
core competencies
skill analysis
Chapter
6|
Pnson-Ba:cd
Review Questions
1.
2.
3.
What are the similarities in the logic underlying job-based and person-based plans?
What
is
the difference between specialist skill plans and generalist skill plans?
Why is there not mo,fe varia+ion in core competencies b,,etween organizations? What does
differ?
Experiential Exercises
1.
2,
3.
Conduct a skill analysis and design a skill certification plan for payroll administrators.
Find the mission statement for an organization with which you are familiar. Define core
conipetencies, competency sets, and competency indicators for this organization.
David Tyson, author ofthe Canadian Compensation Handbook, states, "There are a number of problems with skill-based pay. A major one is thaf in my opinion, it does not comply
with pay equity legislation anywhere in Canada" (p. 27). Familiarize yourself with the basic
components of pay equity legislation by visiting the Ontario Pay Equity Commission wets
site (www.payequity.gov.on.ca). Survey the human resources management professors at
your educational institution on the question "Do you believe that skill/competency-based
pay plans are consistent with pay equity legislation?" Then conduct a debate. starting
a summary of
with
Case
Targeting Teachers' Pay
.The pay schedule shown in Exhibit 5.14 is.typical of many pay plans forteachers; it contains
steps by which a teacher's salary increases with each year of experience as well as with addi-
Once she has received her maste/s degree or qualified as a subject specialist, she will "move
over" to the next column (Group lV). Otherwise she will stay in the Group lll column and
advance one step each year until she reaches step 10 when she "tops out." Note that she will
receive the step increase as well as any entire schedule increases that the school board gives
each year. So any increase to the entire schedule translates into a larger increase for those
teachers currently being paid according to the schedule.
Questions
1.
Although the stepped salary schedule has many features of a knowledge-based pay
system, not everyone agrees. ls this a knowledg6-based pay system? How might you
change it to make it more like the person-based plans discussed in this chapter? What
features would you add/drop?
2.
ln the pay scale in the exhibit, notice that the column differentials increase with years of
experience; for instance, the difference between Group lll and Group lV at one year of
experience is fi3,197, whereas the difference at year 10 is $5,093. What message do these
Pq Strucnra
-1
132
Partl I In*rnalAlignmmt:
EXH|B|T
6.14
Erm
ffi
LEVEL OF EDUCATION
'
GROUP III
GROUP IV
$45,zogi
$47,834
$s1,738
$ss;404'
48,124
51,371
55,213
58,410
Step 2
50,923
.53,297
58,8S7
Step 3
53,722
s6,230
62,5s3
65,573
Step 4
s6;soe
59,532
66,425
qp,736
Step 5
50,089
62,863
70,285
73,899
SteP 5
63,2:73
66,173
74,150
78;oss
Step 7
66,67
69,477
78,015
82,226
SleP 8
59-,552
s5,381
Step 9
72,834
72,7?4
76,107
81,p77
SteP:g
Step
GROUP
GROUP II
Step 10
W:
'
76;,021,
7g,414
'
61,985'
85,746
90,545
89,614
g4,7:07:
Ere
Source: Reproduced with permission of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation/
Fddration des enseignantes-enseignants de l'Ontario.
increasing differentials send to teachers? What pay theories address this issue? How would
these differentials affect teacher behaviours? How would they affect school district costs?
Calculate the size ofthe pay differential for increased seniority versus increased education.
What behaviours do you believe these differentials will motivate? ln other words, what
pays better, growing older or taking courses?
Pay for performance for teachers is a hot topic in many school districts. How might the
salary schedule be made compatible with a performance-based pay approach? Evaluate
your ideas after you have completed Part lll of this book. which discusses employee
contributions.
;$l
iffi
ffi
!
t --'
with Connect.
Connect allows you to practise important concepts at your own pace and on your own schedule, with
2417 online access to an eBook, Practice Quizzes, Study Tools, and more.
Forbes magazine recently reported the earnings of some well-known people, some of whom
are included in Exhibit ll.1.One wasTigerWoods. His golfing prowess is legendary;so are
his earnings, David Letterman made $45 million. Jon Stewart, another late-night talk show
host, earned only $ 1 4 million. Why does Letterman earn more than Stewaft? Perhaps because
Letterman's show brings more viewers (and thus more advertising revenue).
There are many more examples of such stories, and the "pot of gold" that comes with suc-
theToronto Maple Leafs?Why is itthat Barack 0bama, who runs the United States of America,
only earned
$+Oo,OOO,
Look
like deans at Canadian business schools made more than our Prime Minister. Executives
seem
William Doyle (President & CEO, Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan) both earned over $t i million.
Donald Walker (CEO of Magna lnternational) earned over $'16 million, but another Donald
(CEg of Tim Hoftons from 2008 to 2011) only around $:.S million. Michael Jackson seems io
be worth more dead than alive. Can Whitney Houston beat Michael Jackson? Apparently one
day after her death, 43 of the top
Who decides who gets how much? ls pay determined without apparent reason or justice? Or is there some kind of logic? Can you rationalize the earnings of the people on the list
shown in Exhibit ll.1?
'
External competitiveness is the next strategic decision in the total pay model, as shown in
Exhibit ll.2.Two aspects of pay translate external competitiveness into practice: (1) how much to
pay relative to competitors-whether to pay more than competitorq to match what they pay, or
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
The next
two chapters will explain that a variety of answers exist. Chapter 7 discusses
choosing the external competitiveness policy, the impact of that choice, and related theories
and research, Chapter 8 has two parts: First, it disc.psses how to translate competitiveness
policy into pay level and forms. Second, it discusses how to integrate information on pay
levels and forms with the internal structure from Part L
EXHIBIT
ll.2 |
INTERNAL ALIGNMENT
Work Job
Evaluation/
INTERNAL
STRUCTURE
ffiI
ffit
li$l
.'ld
EXTERNAL COMPETITIVENESs
y#:i|"",
surveys
Policy Lines
PAY
STRUCTURE
ffi
':i$,ll
.ait
;"ql
.:91
,ft1
#t
.:.",*l
iA{
:,,4
':'fi
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS
Seniority- Performance-
Based Based
Merit
Guidelines
INCENTIVE
PROGRAMS
E]
:#l
'-,i+l
ril!
.,':,Sl
|i{il
.iEd
lrr-ll
.,?rtl
.:.s]
MANAGEMENT
Costs Communications
Change
'.:t]rt
EVALUAIION
,rli1
i;$_i
::qi'l
:ifl
i.:{itl
"8il
:l#l
,ffi
ffi
LEARNING OUTCOMES
LO1 Describe external competitiveness, and the two specific actions taken in
practice that determ ne extema I competitiveness.
i
LO2 Discuss the three major factors that shape external competitiveness.
LO3 Discuss three labour demand theories and explain their predictions regarding pay.
LO4
Discuss
is always a good rnondr for travel agents in Montreal. In addidon to the permanent PoPularion eager to flee r.he ciry's leaden skies, graduaring students from Monueal's various universides are calvelling ro job interviews with employers across dre country-at comPany expense, full
hre, no Sarurday nighc stayovers required.'l?-hen they return from these trips, srudents comPare
nores and ffnd *rat even for people receiving the same degree irl rhe same field ftom the same
universiry, rhe offers vary from company to comPany. !7hat explains the differences?
Location has an effecr: Firms in Toronto and New York Ciry make higher offers dran in
some other cities.l The work also has an effecc Jobs in recruitrtent pay a linle less than jobs
J*uaty
in compensation and employee relations. And rhe industry to which the different 6rms belong
has
eff.cc Pharmaceuticals, compurer software, and peuoieum ffrms tend to offer more than
"n
and natural resources fums.
\fhy would companies emend identicd offers to most candidates? And why would different
companies .*r.nd diff.r.nt offers? This chapter discusses rhese choices and whar difference chey
make
The sheer ,r,rmb., of economic rheories related ro coropensation might rnake this chapter
heavy going. Another difficuiry is that fie realiry of pay decisioru doesnt necessarily march the
theoriei. The key to this chapter is to always ask- So what? How will this informadon help me?
pay.
il
ri
Pa*lI I
138
LO1
ll
pay level
the avenge
I
of the arny of
of
pay forms
nix of
IT
WiE
s Dnnbrtgtk
Pay
hvcl
In Part I, comparisons insidt the organization wele oemined. In ocernal competitiveness, our
second pay policy, comparisons oilbide the organilrtiosl ars pevisnsd-comparisons with other
employers who hire the same kinds of employees. A major decision when designing a compensation strategy is whedrer to mirror what competitors are doing with pay. Or is ttrere an advantage
in being different? External competitiveness also includes choosing the mix of pay forms (i.e.,
bonuses, stock options, flexible beneftts) that is right for the business strareg)r.
External competitivcness refen to the pay relationships among organizationg-the organizationls
pay relative to its competitors. It is ocpressed in practice by (1) sening a paylevd that is above, belorr,
or equal to competitors' and (2) by considering the mix of pay foms relative to those of competitors.
Borh pay level and pay forms focus on rwo objectives: (1) ro control costs and (2) to anract
and retain employees.2
Control Costs
employe*
the
Exurnal
of paymena that
make up
toE,l compensation
Labour Colts
or
Pay Level
X Number of Employees
Furthermore, the higher the pay level relative to what competitors pay, the greacer the relative cosrs ro provide similar products or services. So you might think that all organizations would
pay the same job the same rate. However, they do not. A report on graduates of the MBA program ar the Rotman School of Manernent at the Universiry ofToronto in 2008 showed thar
the average base sdary for investment researchers was $85,000. The range of salaries for t.he sarne
job ran from $65,000 to $125,000. Thus, some investmenr researchers were making nearly wice
what orhers were paid.3 The same work r paid differendy. !?'hat could justify a pay level above
whatever minimum amount is required to anract and retain financial services scaffi
,@
E"
Chaprer
Anatyzing the
7|
Defning Compctitiaenes
Base Pay
3Oo/o
25o/o
JZ
(o
20o/o
o
{U
15o/o
ctl
(!
10o/o
o
L
o
5o/o
(u
0o/o
-5o/s
Manager
AnalYst
Marketing
Office
Manager
5taff
Technician
Total Compensation
15o/o
10%
P
5o/a
.E
Ao/o
7'
gl
-sw
fo -rox
-1s%
5
o.
=E -20o/o
9
o -zsu
-30%
-35o/o
Manager
AnalYst
Marketing
Office
Manager
5taff
market depends on the companies rhey compare to and the pay forls lcluded in the comparison. it is ,rot
whether this comPany deliberately chose to emphasize markedng managers
"1.",
and deemphasize engineering in ia pay plan, or if it is paying the price for not hiring one of you
readers to desigo thit pl*.dEith"r*"y, rhe point is that even drough people love to talk about
"market rates," there is no single "going rate" in the marketplace'
;goirig
of pay forms. Exhibit 7.2 cornpares the mix of pay
There is also no single
(t"tL"tin! manager) at two comPanies in the same geograPhic area'
forms for the same
-i*"
;ob
139
I
I
140
EXHIBIT
re
7.P I
Dcerminhg dx
bvel
re
Company
I
I
Pa1
A:
Benefits
160/o
I
I
I
t
Company
B: Total Compensation
= $112,748
Benefits
17o/o
I
I
Benefits
2Oo/o
re
're
Both companies offer about the same total compensation. Yer the percentages allocated to
bonuses, beneffs, and options are very different.
base,
Chapcer
7 | Defning Competitivcna
"_u,tir
.',
i
'
LO2
Xlootogr,
'-' ,onlr**pay
2.
9.
4.
The
benefis, even uaining).
The markets faced by employers are comPedtive, so there is no advantage for a single
employer ro pay above or below dre market rate'
Alhough
chese assumprions
;;;;*,
,,
141
I
I
t
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
T
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
Pann |
142
EXHIBIT
7.4 I
4,rtu1&nEdidrc
Deetmiaiag &c
Pay
Leut
$upply and Demand for Business School Gnaduates in the Short Flun
re
$too,
I
I
I
+oo
E(E
cn
q
o
.s
=
.cl
L
o
o
o-
't
$25,000
I
t
I
I
E
gives a simple illustation of demand and supply for business school graduates.
vertical axis represents pay rares &om $25,000 to $100,000 a year. The horizontal axis
depigts rhe number of business school graduates in the market. The line labelled "demand" is the
sum of all employers' hiring preferences for business grad.uates at various pay lwels. At $100,000,
only a small number of business graduates will be hired, because only a few ffrms will be able
to afford them. Ar $25,000, companies. can afford to hire a large number of business graduates.
llowever, the line labelled 'iopply'' indicates that there aren't a large number of business graduates willing to be hired at $25,000, In frct, only a small number are willing to work for $25,000.
A" p"y rates rise, more graduates become interested in working, so the labour supply line slopes
upward. The market rate is dre point where the lines for labour demand and labour supply cross.
ln this illusuation, the interaction among dl employers and all business graduates determines the
$50,000 market rate. Because any single ernployer can hire dl the business graduates it wants at
$50,000, and all business graduares are ofequal qudiry (assumption 2 above), there is no reason
for any wage other than $50,000 to be paid.
'The
Exhibit 7 .4
Labour Demand
So,
if $50,000 is rhe market-determined rate for business graduatei, how many business graduates
will a speciffc employer hire? To answer this question, an andysis of labour demand is required.
In the short rerm, rur employer cannot change any other factor of production (i.e,, technology,
marginal product of
labour
capital, or natural resources). Thus, its level ofproducdon can change only ifit changes the lcvel
of human resources. Under such conditions, a single employert demand for labour coincides with
its margind product of labour.
of
wiill
the
emplogent
L_,__
:,
Chapter
7|
(rhe change in output associated wirh the addidonal unic of labour) of employing rhe third
But adding a founh business graduate generates only try_o, new
business graduate is four clienrs.
marginal
producdviry resula &om the fact that each additional gradudiminishing
This
clienr,
of the orher Factors of producdon with which to work. In
smaller
share
a
progressively
has
are
such as office space, number of compurers, level of clerical
factors
of
producdon
term,
shorr
the
are
ffxed.
Unril these factors ofproducrion are changed, each addilines
relephone
and
supporr
donal new hire produces less than dre previous hire. The arnount each new hire produces is the
margina.l Product of labour.
marginal revenue of labour is the money generated by rhe sale of rhe marginal
oroduct-the additional output from the employment of one addidonal person. In rhe case of
rh. .onsulcing ftrm, it is the revenues generated by each addirional business graduate. If each
new dienr generates $25,000 in revenue, then the third employee's four new clients will generate
ihe
$100,000. Bur the fourth employee's nro new cliena will generate only $50,000. This $50,000
is exaccly rhe wage that must be paid ro that founh employee. So the consulting firm will break
even on the fourth employee but wili lose money if it hires rnore than that. Recall that the frrst
labour marker *reory assumption is thar employers seek to ma.ximize profits. Therefore, the consulting firm.will continue to hire rnore business graduates until the marginal revenue generated
by rhat last hire is equal to the costs associared with employing that business graduate. Because
orher pocential costs will not change in che shorr run, the level of demand that maximizes proftrs
is rhailevel at which rhe marginal revenue of thi last hire is equal to the wage rate for that hire.
Exhibic 7.5 shows the connection between the labour market model and condidons facing
a singlc employer. On rhe left is the same supply and demand model frorn Exhibit 7.4 showing
thar pay level ($50,000) is determined by the interaction of dl employers' demand for busiiress
graduates. The right side of *re exhibic shows supply and demand for an individual employer. At
rhe market-determined rate ($50,000), the individual employer can hire as many business graduares as it wanrs. Therefore, supply is now an unlimited horizonml line. Howevec the demand line
sdll slopes do'arnward. The rwo lines intersect at 4. So for this employer, the market-determined
wage rate ($50,000) equals the margina.l revenues of the fourth hire. The marginal revenue of the
fifth graduate is less than $50,000 and so will not add enough revenue to cover costs. The point
on che graph at which the incremental income generared from an addidonal ernployee equals the
wage rete is the marginal rvenue product.S
EXHIBIT
7.5 |
o
o $100,000
the
a&itioral
-o
+o
$25,000
nn gaw-
other pduaionfucrs
constant
Marginal revenue
$so,ooo
rata
.c
Ol
(t
marginal revenue of
labour
(u
o-
:o
(o
o
'6
:t
t43
Dcfnmg Competinaetzs
o)
u
Et
P
o
o
123456
Number of business graduates hired
ffi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
144
Waag
&
Pa7
Lcwt
A manager 'sing &e nardnat rsvenue produc model must do only rwo things: (l) deermine the paf lerd ser b). merket forccs and (2) determine the marginal revenue generated by each
new hire. This will ell the rnaner how many people to hire'
The model provides a rnluable analpical framework, but it oversirnplfies the red wodd
In most organizations, it is rlmcm impossible to q.rtaflEry the goods or services produced by an
individual employee, because most production is tluough joint cfforts of cmploy.ees with a variety
ofskills. Eves-in serrings that use picce rates (e,g., 50 cenrs for each soccer ball scwn), it is hard
to separate dre conuibutions of labour from.tSese-of other resources (e.g., efficient machinery
sturdy rnaterials, good lighdng, vcntiladon)'
So neirher the marginal product nor thc marginal revenue is diricdy measurable. However,
managers do need some mensure rhat reflects vdue. In the preceding two chaprcrs, compensable
fa"tori, skills, and competencies wcrc discussed. For orample, if compensable factors deffne what
organizadons value in work, then job ev-aluadon reflects the jobt coriribution to the organization
*i -"y
be viewed as a proxy for marginal levenue product. However, compensable facors are
(e.g., skills required, problem solving required, resporui-
as the
value of dre output. This same logic applies to skills and conpetencies.
Labour SuPPIY
closer look at the assumptions about the behaviour of potendd employee shows that fiis
model assumes that many people are seeking jobs, that they possess accurate information about
all job openings, and dat no barriers to mobilfty (discrimination, Iicensing provisions, or unioq
membership requiremcna) ocist beween jobs'9
ns in 6e a"alpis of labour deman4 tlese assumptions gready simplify the real world. As the
assumpdons change,.so does tfie supply. For example, the upward+loping supply assumes that as
p.ople will be willing to take a job. But if unemployment tates ,ue low,_offers
pay increases,
-ot"
of high"r pay may aot increase sup--ply;-everyone who lvants to work is already working. If cornpetiton qui"kly march a higher offer, the emFloyer may face a higher pay lwel but no increase in
,"ppln ,o thar it ends up payrry more foJ thc employees it already has, but is sdll shorthanded.
.-ployo who dominates the local labour market, such as Essar Stccl Algoma Inc. in
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, may also ffnd that raising wages doesnt necessarily amract more applicants, simply because the supply has &ied up. People who are conveniendy located and interested
there. Any additional applicants must be.induced to enter the labour supply,
in work.r.
"tt."ay
perhaps from schools, retirement, or more distant areas. So a dominant cmployer has a_relatively
'free
g:rist. However,
hand in determinirig pay levels, bccause ferv local labour market compctitors
attract more
in
the
levels
may
not
pay
once the local labour supply is exhausted, small increases
"step"
due
shape
a
firnction
upward,
but
it
may
takc
on
the
of
slopes
applicans. The supply still
--;t
to the large pay increases needed to artract.additional peoplc. Although many ffrms find lowering
drc job requirements and hiring less-ikilled workers a bettcr choicc than raising wages, this choice
incurs increased training costs (which were included in assumption 3 above).
LO3
TI
The story is told of the economics professor and the srudentwho were suolling through campus.
"Look" the student cried, "theret a $i00 bill on the path!"
. "No, that cannot be," the wiser head replied. "lFthere were a $ 100 bill, someone would have
Picked
'
it
uP."
The polnt of the story is thatcconornic theories frequendy must be revised to account for
r."liry. !7b.n we change our focus from all the employers in an economy to a particular employer,
models musr be modiffed to help us understand what actudly occurs. A particularly uoublesome issue for economists is why an ernployer would pay more than what theory states is the
E'-
Chapcer
7|
Defning
Comptdtbre
t4!i
THEORY
50 WHAT?
PREDICTION
Compensating Workwithnegativechiiacteristics
Jiffe;entials'Efficiency
wage
Siqnaliing
.
.?:uotn*cs
of compdnsation.
"whole of the advanMore than 200 years ago, Adam Smirh argued that individuals consider the
on the alternadve
based
tages and disadvantages of differen^t employmena" and make decisions
if the necessary
rhat
is,
job
characteristics,
has negative
wi-tt tt" grearesr "net advanrage."l0 If a
worliing conjob
is
tenuous-(stockbrokers),
(medical
security
school),
uaining iirr.ry op.ntive
(professional
are
low
ofsuccess
that
chances
(garbage
or
the
collectors),
ditions-are disagreeable
his is
feacures.
these
negative
for
to
compensate
wages
higher
offer
must
spons), dren employers
known as the compcnsating dlfferentials theory.
Compensatin! differeniials explain the presence of various pay rates in dre market. Although
the nocion is appealing, it is hard ro document, due co the difficuldes in measuring and control-
I
compensating ditrereo-
tials theory
fretdaafr*tt4 srcgEj
m&tcffitolpa-.
sate
fwnqgd,e ftmtel
i6
3.
4.
Reduce
5.
-*ur"d
r.
hishWesmryirog-
effriaryatdlosfur
ql.ality4frr6Ydrrfl
say
to work r*"r,", or harder. The underlying assumption is that pay level decermines effon-agaia,
an appeding notion rhat is dif;frcult ro document.
Th.r. i. some research on efficiency wage theory.ll One study looked at shi*ing behaviour
by e<amining employee discipline and wages in several auto plants. Higher wages were associated
war*tlg,tder
costsWffitttqt*J,E
-"y irr.r."r.
of
1.
I
I
I
wages
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
t
I
I
t
146
?afin I
I
I
t
T
T
oftet
Research shows
Signalling Theory
signalling theory
tl'F- idea that pay levels
Dcfrla;nbg
Wtre
high unemployurent nade it more difficult for fired or disciplined ernployees to find another job.
So, aldrough rhe hfher wegcs cut shirking, the authors were unable to say whether it was cut
I
I
I
E*Et tzl
Signalting theory holds that employers deliberady design pay levels and mix as part of a stratry
16
rhat signals ro borh prospective and current employees what kinds ofbehaviours are sought Vielrd
and
a'brand
to
pay
what
pay
forms
are
offered
esablishes
how
much
lens,
a
markering
.brou$
drat sends a mcssage to prospeccive employees, just like brands of cornpeting products and services.lT
A policy of paying below the market for base pay yet offering generous bonuses or training
opponunides sends a different signd, and presumably atuacts different people, than a policy of
matching market wage wirh no performance-based pay. An employer who cor^$ines Iower base
with high bonuses may be signalling that it walts employees who are risk talers. The proponioo of
people within the organization who are eligible for bonuses signds whether the same pay rystem is
geared rc all employees or to managers only and helps to communicate performance orpectations.
Thke another look at Exhibit 7 .2, vftich shows a breakdown of forms of pay for two competitors, as well as rheir relationship to the markec. The pay mix at company A emphasizes base
(84 percent) more than at company B (64 percent) or the market average (67 percend. Company
A pays no bonus, no stock options, and somewhat lighter beneffts. Company Bb mix is closer to
the market average. \7hat is rhe message that As pay mix is communicating? The astute reader
will note thar ar A, one c:rn earn the $1L2,349 with very litde apparent liak to performance;
whereas at B, earning the $112,748 requires performance bonuses and stock opdons
as
well.'S7hy
would anyone work at B wjthout extra rerurns for the riskier pay?'\ilfithout a premium, how is B
able ro atrracr and recain employees? Perhaps with more interesting projects, flqible schedules,
or morc opponuniry for promotion-dl pan of Bt "total pay brand."
A srudy of universiry sruden$ approaching graduation found that both pay level and mix
affected their job decisions.ls Studenm wanted jobs that offered hgh p"y, but they also showed
a preference for indiiidual-based (rather than team-based) pay, fixed (rather than variable) pay,
job.-based (rather than skill-based) pay, and flexible benefits. Job seekers were rated on various
personal dimensions-rnaterialism, conffdence in their abilities, and risk 2vg13i6n-v/hich were
related to pay preferences. Pay level was most irnportant to materialists and less important to
rhose who were risk-averse. So applican$ appear to select among job opponunities on the basis
of the perceived match between their persond dispositions and the nature of the organization, as
signalled by the pay system. Both pay level and pay rnix send a signal.
Chaprer
7 | DSning
147
Compaitiuetza
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
Signallirig works on the supply side of the model, too, as suppliers of labour signal to potendal employers. People who'are becer uained, have higher grades in relevant courses, and/or have
related work experience signal to prospective ernployers that they are likely to be berter performers.
(Presumably they sigod with dre same degree of accuracy as employers.) So both characterisrics
ofthe applicants (degrees, grades, ocperience) and organization decisions about pay lwel (lead,
match, lag) and mix (higher bonuses, beneftt choices) acr as signds that help communicate.
r-I
I
I
I
LO4
Two rheories shown in Exhibit 7.7_tcr,ewaiLon wage and human capial-focus on undermanding employee behaviour rather than employers-the supply side of the model.
latd|p/orvwf*hWd
not acrwt
rob,
howatwivetle
tn
rr:glter
dEib
atfibutEs.
Human CapitalTheory
Human capital theory, perhaps t'he most influentid economic theory for orplaining pay lwel
differences, is based on the premise that higher earnings flow to those who improve their potential productiviry by investing in themselves (by acquiring addicional education, training, and
experience).zo The theory assumes rhat people are in fact paid at the vdue of rleir margiod
product. Improving producdve abilities by inrresdng in training or even in one's physical hedth
will increase onet margind product. The value of an individual's skills and abilities is a funcdon
of the time, expense, and resources expended to acquire them. Consequendy, jobs that require
long and expensive uaining (engineers, physicians) should receive higher pay lwels chan jobs that
require less invcsrment (derical workers' demenury school teachers)'
arenadebyrrgp*tttp
hrryweffiFisbt
FAr*+tyWqt*E
edcto.t a?*eq,dn
ryiere
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
14A
I__I
t*
PRODUCT MABKET FACTORS
The supply and demand for labour arc major determinants of an employert pay lwel. Howevel,
any organization must generate, ovet time' enortgh revenue to cover exPenses' induding compensation. It follows that an employer's pay level is constrained by its ability to compete in the product/
service market. So product market conditions determine to a large offent what the organization
can afford to pay.
Product demand and dre degree of competidon are the wo kry product market 6ctors.
Both affect the abiliry of the organization to change what it charges for ia producs and services.
If prices annnot be chaoged without decreasing sales, then the abiliry of the employer ro ser e
I
I
Product Demand Although labour market conditions (and legd requirements) put a floor on
the pay level required to attract sufficient employees, the product market pua a ceiling on rhe
maximum pay level that an emplopr can set If the crnployer pa;ts above the maximum, it must
either pass on rhe higher pay level to consumcrs doo"gh price increases or hold prices ffxed and
allocate a greater share of total revenue to cover labour costs.
Degree ol Gompetition Ernployers in highly competitive markea such as rnanufacturers of
automobiles or generic drugs are less able to raise prices without loss of revenues, At the other
exrreme, single sellers of a lamborghini or the drug Magra are able to set whaterter price they
choose. Howwer, too high a price often invites *re rye of government regulators,
Other factors besides product market condidons affect pay level. Some of these have
already been discussed. The producdviry oflabour, the technology employed, the level ofproduction reladye ro plant capacity available+ll affect compensation decisions. These factors
vary more across than within indusries. The technologies employed and consumer preferences
m y vary beween auto manu6cturers, but the differences are relatively small when compared
to che technologies and product demand of auto manufacturers v.ersus the oil or financial
industry.
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
A number of additional factors affect the supply of labour. Geographic barriers to mobiliq,
betwecn jobs, union requircments, lack of information about job openings, the degree of r;s1g
involved, and the degrec of unemployment also influence labour markets.
I
I
SaY
Discussions with managers provide insight into how all of these economic factors translate into
acual pay decisions, In one srudy, a number of scenarios were presented in which unemployrnent, profttabilicy, and labour market conditions varied-2l Managers were asked to make wage
adjustment recommendations for several positions. kvel of unemployment made almost no difference. One manager was incredulous at the suggestion: "You mean take advanage of the ftct
that ttrere are a lot of people out of work?" The company's profftability was considered a factor for
higher rnanagemenr in setdng the overall pay budget but not something manage$ consider for
individual pay adjustments. lfhat it boiled down to was "'$7'hatever the chief financial officer says
wi c* afford!" They thought it shonsighted to pay less, oren though market conditions would
have permirted lower pay. In direct contradiction to efficiency wage thcory managers believed
that problems in artracdng and keeping people were the result of poor management rather than
inadequate compensation. Thry offered the opinion that 'tupervisors try to solve with money
their difficuldes with managing people."u
ChaprerT
I Dd"t"C
Compethtuena
,l
:l
149
shiftiri$ iioniimic
how
prCssures
Observing nianafeii iCfnal ibspoiises'-to
into actual pay decisions. Significant differences in wages paid
econornic pressures translate
companies to cut pay,23
..ourd ,h. *orld and rle ease of outsourcing work overseas has led many
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
Work Hospitals can staff nursing positions from four sources: regular
cemporary-help agencies specializing in nurses, and "ravellers"-11115ssg
part-time,
.'nilt-ii-.,
that send them to hospitds around che country for extended perio&, For
agencies
by
employed
This
segmentcd labour supply means using muldple sources of nurses from
rnonchs.
six
example
people Flow to the
muldplelocacions wirl muldple employment reladonships. The level and mix of cash and benefi,s p6d to each nurse depends on rhe source. Regular employees get pay and beneftts; part-timers
o., p"y bur no benefirs; agency nurses get pay and bcnefits from the agency; and "uavellers" get
iay-benefics, and living expenses from the agency.The hospiral pays a fee to the agency in addi,o th. nurses' compensation. The segmented supply results in nurses working the same jobs
side by side but earning different pay. This is a case of people flowing to the work, because a
frospitrl cannor send irs nursing tasks off-site to other cities or offshore to other nadons.24
,i*
Work Flows to the People{n-Sitq 0tl-Site, 0ffshore A computer sofrware design company
(contract
can staffa projecr with employees who are on-sire in rheir Canadian head office, off-site
employees duoughour Canada), or ofFshore in India or orler countries. To bid on projects, the
company needs ro know pay lcvels and mixes of forms not only in Canada, but other locations
including Long Beach, California; IGakow, Poland; Shanghai, China; and Bangalore, India.
IT
Theories of market dynamics, rhe interaction ofsupply and demand, form a usefirl foundadon.
The segmented sources of labour mean chat determining pay levels and mix increasingly
requires undersending marker condidons in different locations worldwide.
Managers also need to know the jobs required to do dre work, the tasls to be performed,
and the knowledge and behaviours required to perform them (sound likc job analysis?) so
t.hat they can bundle the various tasls to send to different locations.
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
Alrhough product and labour market conditions create a range of possibilities within which
managers creare a policy on external cornpetitiveness, organizadonal factors influence pay level
and mix decisions also.25
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
150
Pan
il | E*mal @az:c
t
I
I
I
T
Pa1
Iatd
There is consistent evidence that large organizations tend to Pay more tha-n small ones' A snrdy
of manufrcnging fi1ms found that firms with 100 to 500 workers paid 6 percent higher wages
rhan did ,*d1gr 6r-s; ftrms of more rhan 500 workeql paid 12 percent more thall did dre smallest
frrms.z8 This reladonship bewreen organization size, ability to pay, and pay level is consistent
with economic rheory. Ii says that talented individuds have a higher margind vdue in a larger
organization because they can influence more people and decisions, which leads to more proffts.
Co'*p.r" the advertising revenue David Lemerman can bring to CBS versus the potenrial revenue
ro station CHD( if his late-night show were seen only in Peterborough, Ontario. No matter how
cool he is in Peterborough, CHD( could not generate enough revenue to be able to afford to
CBS can. However, theories are less usefirl for explaining
such as CBS, including janitors and compensadon
companies
at
bigger
*iy po"ti.rlly.everyone
everyone has Letterman's impact on rcvenues.
that
unlikely
It
seems
o,r,,"g.rr, is paid more.
pay Mr. Lemerrnan $45
hilion; but
EmploYees' Preferences
tvhat pay forcrs (health insurance, vision care, bonuses, pensions) do employees really value?
B.n , ,rrrd.rrt nding of employee preferences is increasingly imponant in deterrnining external
comperitivenesr. M"lk u, ,it i.ll,-in roL'" both employers and employees' choices'?g {:Y.u.t
'S7ho among us would be so
th"re .r. subsrantial &fficulties in reliably measuring preferences.
rank. money over cordial co-workers or challenging assignments in response
'"Srhat do you value mo$ in your w_ork?" Researchers ftnd that people
question,
to the survey
put more impo*". on Pay than they arc willing to admit'30
crass as
to (publidy)
Organization's StrategY
no-services strat-
'
Amriery of pay level and mix suategies exism. Some employers adopt a low-wage,
eff; &ey compere by producing goods Td services with as lide toal compensation
as possible.
5ike and Reebok rei.n dty do ttis. Borh rely heavily on outsourcing to manufacture their prodconuacuc$. Nil<e, for errrtrpL, outsources almost all of its foowear production to independent
working
and
lower
are
much
costs
tors in China, Vieto"m, lndonesia, andThailand, where labour
$mtegr.
conditions much worse 1}1an in North America. Others sdect a low-base, high+ervices
and
childcare
with
who
assist
socid
workers
to
a
hodine
Marrion offers irs low-wage room clcaners
others
Still
immigrants'
recent
for
avai]able
also
are
courscs
t,"nsporsrdon crises. Eng[sh
ry " rydt
"Fully present at work" approadr is an erample-of the
, base high-serui.., "pprl.h. Meduonict
high-..teiot appmach. Obviously, these are 5(uemes on a continuum of possibilities.
hjgt
-b;,
I_-I
RELEVANT MAHKETS
Econo*ists take
*the
market' for ganted, as in, "the rnarket determines wages." Howev.er, for
to pay'
rnandernent, deffning the relerant market a big part of ffguring out how much
I
I
lx
Employer Size
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Dtlrznhrirs
rh. ooioo of a single homogeneous labour rnarket may be an interesting anal)'trdemand and
cal device, each organization opeiates in manylabour rnarlcets, each with unique
pay pulposes and
for
are
relevant
that
markets
*re
define
must
supply. Cor,r.q,r.#y, -*"g"r,
i*oogh
I
I
coirpetitive positioru for their own markets. The drree faccors usually
"ppropri"te,.levant labour markets are the occupadon Gkill/knowledge required),
used to deterine'the
(other employers in dre
geography (willingness ro relocare and/or commure), and competitors
oi"itirf, th.
i
I
t"*"
I
I
I
tI
L__,_
rnarlcets)'
on
How do ernployers choose their relevant market? Surprisingly litde-research has been done
rates will
this issue. S,rt ii U. markes are incorrectly defined, the estimates of competitors' pay
be incorrect and the pay level and mir inappropriately srablished'
E.?
='ChapterT
I D$ni:A
Coaanna
Two srudies do shed some light s11 rhi< issu-3l Thcy condude that managers look at both
locarion, and size-and {re jobr-the skiLls arrd k"gy_Ldgq
rheir comperirors-their produc6,
to
the
organizadon's success (e.g., lawyers in law fums, softntare
required, and their importance
on its locarion and size, a comPany may be deemed a
So,
depending
.niirr..n ac Microsoft).
a
producr
marker competitor. For example, an accounting
if
it
is
not
even
,r[u*, compruison
gs set pay rates for new accountants without
be
fssli.sh
would
Marie,
Ontario,
Sre.
frm in Sault
its
accountants.
A
nonprofft organizadon like rle Red Cross
paying
I(PMG
is
whar
knowing
will
want
to
lrrrow
oficer
t.he pay levels of senior finance positions
chief
financial
a
for
looking
across
the
country, whereas a new local Starbucla
for-profit
organizations
and
nonprofir
in both
only
concern
itself
would
wi*r local pay rates. (See Chaptcr 8
cashier/barista
a
for
looking
srore
defining
the
relev'ant
market,)
oq
discussion
detailed
moie
for
"
The data from product market competitors (as opposed to labour market compedtors) are
likely to receive greater weight when
1.
2,
3.
4.
-t
I
!
!
Employee skills are specific to the product marker (recdl the differences in General Motors
millwrights versus Bombardier millwrigha),
Labour costs are a large share oftotal cosu,
Product demand is responsive to price changes-that is, people wont pay $20 for a botde
VQA winq theyll have Fuzion instead, and
The supply of labour is not responsive to changes in pay (jobs drar are low-wage and require
low skill).
Compensation dreories offer some help in understanding ttre variations
in pay lwels we
observe beween employers. They are less helpful in understanding ditffi:rences in the rnix of pay
forms. Relevant markets are shaped by pressures &om rhe labour and product markets and the
organization. But so whar? How, in fact, do managers set pay level and pay mix policy, and what
difference does
il
it
make?
will
be discussed.
ALTERNATIVES
Recall drar pay level is rhe average ofthe array ofrates inside an organization. There are three
convendonal pay Ievel policies: ro lead, to meet, or to follow competition. Newer policies emphasize flexibiliry: among policies for different employee groups, among pay forms for individud
employees, and among elernents of the employee relatiopship they wish to emphasize ia their
'1,
Given the choice ro match, lead, or lag, the most common policy is to match rates paid by compedtors.33 Managers historically justify this policy by saying that fulure to match competitors'
rates would cause dissadsfaction among present employees and limit the organization's ability to
recruit. Many non-unionized companies tend to match or even lead co.mpetition in order rc discouage unionization.3aA pay-with-competition policy uies to ensure that an organizationt wage
cosrs are approximately equal to those of its product competitors and that its abiliry to attract
Epplicants will be approximately equal to its labour market compedtors. Classical economic
151
LOs
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
il
I
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
152
EXHIBIT
7.8 |
Oa@
d* Pq Letel
il
models predict that employers will meet competitive wages. Although this policy avoi& placing
an employ.t at a disadvantage in pricing products, it may not provide an employer with a compeitive advaatage in its labour markets,
Lead Policy
employees.
Additionally a lead policy may rnask negative job attributes that contribute to high turnover later
on (e.g., lack of challenging assignmenrs or hostile colleagues). Remember the managers'view
that hilh rurnover w"s likely to be a managerial rather t'han a compensation problem.sT
Lag Policy
A policy
employees'
go**.., if pay lwel is lagged in return for the promise of higher furure returns (e.g., scock
ownership in a irigh+ech starr-up firm), such a promise may increase employee commitmot and
'-
ChapterT
I D$ning
Competitivmcss
on pay
EXHIEIT
re
7.9
I
I
l
I
t
I
E
Market Match
Options
I
I
T
160/o
T
Security (Commitment)
Work/Life Balance
t
I
I
Benefits
20o/o
Base
5Oo/o
options
1Oo/o
Bonus
10o/o
tl
154
P*tlI
Pay
buel
rhree. The narhet tnatch simply mimics the pay mix competitors are pafing.
ally make tiese mir decisions is a ripe issue for more research.
liii
How managers position their organizationi pay against competitors is changing. Some alternadves thar are emerging focus on total returns frorn work (beyond ffnancid returns) and offering
people choices among rhese returns. Rather than flgxible, perhaps a better term would be "fuzy'
policies.
Eniployet'.of Ghoice/Shared Ghoice Some companies compete on the basis of dreir overall
reputarion"ds a place to work, beyond pay level and mix. For example, IBM competes wirhin
the informarion rcchnology marketplace and positioru its pay "among the best" in dris group.
Furtherniore, it claims to 'tuongly differentiate based on business and individual resulul It leads
the market wirh is srong emphasis on performance. IBM also offers octensive raining oppomrnities, chdlenging work assignments, and the like. In a sense, "employer of choice" corresponds
as
an employer.
The shared choice apprciach begins wirh thetraditional alternatives of lead, meet, or hg. B*
it then adds a second part, which is to offer employees choices (within limits) in dre pay mi* This
"employee as cusromer" perspective is not all that revoludonary. Many employers offer choices
on health insurance (individual versus dependant coverage), retiremenr investmeots (growrh or
value), and so on.38 (See information on flexiblc benefis in Chaprcr 9.) More advanced software
is making the employee-as-customer approach more feasible. Mass customization-being able
ro select anong a variety of feacure*is roudne when purchasing a new laptop or car. It is now
possible wich total compensation too. Does offering people choices matter? One risk is that
employees might makc choices *rat jeopardize their financial well-being, for example inadequate
health insurance. Another is the "24 jars of jam" .dilemma. Supermarlret studies report rhat offerigg consumers a taste ofjust a few different jams increases sales. Bur offering a taste of 24 different
jams decreases sales. Consumers feel overwhclmed by too many choices and simply wdk away.
Perhaps offiring employees too many choices of differenr kinds of pay will lead to confrrsion,
mistakes, and dissatisfacdon.3g
Pitfalls of Pies
The pie charts in Exhibir 7.9 contrast various pay-mix policies. However, thinling about the
mix of pay forms as pieces in a pie chart has limitacions. These are particularly dear when the
valuc of options is volatile. The pie charts in Errhibit 7.10 show a well-known software company's
mix before and aftsr a rnajor scock market decline (srcck prices plummeted 50 percent within a
month). Note rhe effects on the composition of the pay forms. Base pay went from 47 percent
to 55 percenr of toml compensation, whereas the value of stock opdons fell from 28 percent to
16 percent. (The reverse has happened in this company, too.) But wait, it can get worse. One
technolory company w.rs forced to disclose that three-quarters of all its stock options were "under
warer,' that is, orercisable at prices higher chan their market price. Due to stock markct'voladliry, the options had becorne wortiless to employees. So what is the message to employees? To
competirors? Has the compensation strategT changed? Not the cornpany's intended strategy. But
in realiry, the mix has changed. So possible volatiliry in the value of different pay forms needs to
i
L_____-
be anticipated
Some companies prefer to report the mix of pay forms using a "dashboard," as depicted in
Exhibit 7. I I . The dashboard changes the focus from emphasizing the relative importance of each
form within a single company to comparing each form by itsclf rc the rnarket (many companies).
In {re example, the rralue of stock options is 79 percent of competitors' median, base pay is at
95 percent of comperitors' mefian, and overall totd compensation is 103 percent of (or 2 percent
above) the rnarket,median. Pies, dashboards-different focus, both recognizing the importance
=r.
ChaprerT
-'i
I Ddning Coftpttitbena
Stock Value
Declines 50%
After
:...
.:..+
Benefits
Benefits
17o/o
19o/o
Base
47a/o
Bas
55%
Options
160/o
Bonus
Bonus
10o/o
8o/o
EXHIBIT
7.11
il.'..''i:'.]..:li:'.'.].:'.;'.'E
Stock Options Base Salary
79o/o
95o/o
Benefits
103%
Bonus
Perquisites
122%
113o/o
eo
190
r30
140
1O2o/o
E
The mix employees receive can also differ at different levels of the internd job structure.
Exhibit 7.12 shows rhe different mix of base, cash incentives, and stock opdons Merrill Lynch
pap.at differenr organizational levels. Executive leadership posirions receive less than I0 percent io
base, about 20 percent in smds and rhe re$ in annual incentives. Compare this to 50 percert in
base, 40 percenr in annual incentives, and 10 percent in stock for mid-level manager/professional
positions, and 80 percent'base, 20 percent incentives, and no stoik for enry- and lowerJwd jobs.
Although rhe percentages vary across organizations, greater emphasis on performance (through
155
I
I
I
t
I
t
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
156
re
rc
I
I
Entry
Mid-level
Level
Manager
Executive
incentives and stock) at higher levels is corlmon practice. This is based on the belief that jobs at
higher levels in the organization have greater oppomrnicy to influence organizationd performance,
rT
Earlier it was noted that enrernal cornpetitiveness has trnro major conseguences: It affects (1) operating expenses and (2) ernployee aairudis and work behaviours. Exhibit 7.13 summarizes these
conseguences, which have been discussed throughout t*ris chapter. The competitiveness policy
direcdy affects the compensation objectives of efficiency, fairness, and compliance. The .Net
'Wonh
box here summarizes several strategic compensation issues based on a survey of over 200
compensation professionals.
EXHIEIT
7.13
Chapter
7|
137
Defning ComPctitims
A second critical isue for many respondents was determining which market shou:d be
piiced against. There is widespread recognition of the existence of different defi:"idons
of markeG (e.g., geographic breakouts, Jrom local to global; product market ccmpetitor
or industry breakouts; size breakout), but much concern about when each migh: be used.
one respondent noted that while the "textbook" answer was available, it didn't srn to
match the reality reflected in discussions with colleagues and other professionals.
third compensation strategy issue raised by respondents was the deire for guid+
lines on how competitive to be in a variety of different situations, and what a compeiitiveness strategy that delineated these situations would look like. Different breakout
The
groups (e.g., hot jobs, critical jobs, typical jobs, executive jobs) were the focus of cifferent respondents, but the common thread running through comments in this area is how
one should best determine the competitive level of rewards
The
fourth
issue raised
for
a set of
jobr
labour market should be based solely on wages, or whether a broader rewarCs measure
(e.g., total cash compensation, total compensation, compensation plus worMife baiance) should be used. There appears
guidelines
'mamer
what *re competitive pay pohcy, it needs to be sanslated into practice. The starting
No
poinr is assesing rhe market through use of a salary survey. For this, we must rurn to the nert ctrapter.
Conclusion
Three importanr conclusions emetge from this chapter: (1) There is no "going rate," and so
factors.
-*"g.rri".r. ro make conscious pay level and pay mix decisions influenced by severallevel
arrd
fie
pay
im_Pact
competitors-that
market
labour
(2) Tf,ere are borh producr market-and
consequences.
different
have
mix
decisions
and
pay
level
pay
Alt.rrr.rir'.
pay mix decisions.
?3)
The pay model used tlrro,rgholrt *ris book emphasizes saategic policy issues: objecdves, internal
.lign*..r, ecernal competitive-ness, employee coruibutions, and management. Policies need to be
des-igned to achiwe specific pay objecti-ves.
This section
is concerned
'
!
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
T
158
?ann I hmnal
Campaitiuazas: Dcmmining
tk
Pe1
Lael
[I
Ghapter SummarY
l. Exernd
3.
and signalling theory. Compensating differcntials theory predicts *rat work with negative
characreristics will require higher pay to attract workers. Efficicncy wage theory predicts that
above-rnarlcet wages will improve cfficiency by atrracting workers who perform betteq say
Ionger and require less supervision. Signalling theory predicts that pay policies will signal the
kind of behaviour the employer wants (demand side) and what potendal hires bring to the
5.
Key Terms
compensating differentials
theory
efficiency wage theory
human capital theory