Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POISONING
OBJECTIVES
RPCTs
Raphael et al.
Lancet 1989; 2:414-419
Thom et al.
Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:474-480
Scheinkestel et al.
Med J Australia 1999; 170:203-210
Weaver et al.
New Engl J Med 2002; 347:1057-1067
RAPHAEL ET AL.
Methodology
not blinded
LOC v. no LOC
RAPHAEL ET AL.
Methodology 2
RAPHAEL ET AL.
Methodology 3
No LOC (Group A)
6 hrs 100% O2 v. 2 hrs HBOT +4 hrs O2
LOC (Group B)
1 HBOT v. 2 HBOTs
RAPHAEL ET AL.
Methodology 4
Standard::
RAPHAEL ET AL
Results
Group A: no difference
Group B: 1 HBOT =
2 HBOTs
RAPHAEL ET AL.
Conclusions
No LOC: 100% O2
LOC: 1 HBOT
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Raphael et al.
not blinded
inadequate HBOT
no meaningful F/U
THOM ET AL.
Methodology
not blinded
THOM ET AL.
Methodology 2
THOM ET AL.
Methodology 3
telephone at 3 months
THOM ET AL.
Results
HBOT: 0% DNS
THOM ET AL.
Conclusions
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Thom et al. (Olson Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:535-537)
not blinded
no NP testing before rx
? incid of depression
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Thom et al. (Olson, continued)
blinded
include all pts (mild, mod, severe)
thorough follow-up
reproducible NP testing
SCHEINKESTEL ET AL.
Methodology
SCHEINKESTEL ET AL.
Methodology 2
NBO:
HBOT:
SCHEINKESTEL ET AL.
Methodology 3
MMSE before rx
SCHEINKESTEL ET AL.
Results
SCHEINKESTEL ET AL.
Results
SCHEINKESTEL ET AL.
Conclusions
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Scheinkestel et al.
46% follow-up
iatrogenic O2 toxicity
WEAVER ET AL.
Methodology
WEAVER ET AL.
Methodology 2
pre-rx MMSE
HBOT: 1st:
3,then 2 ATA
WEAVER ET AL.
Methodology 3
WEAVER ET AL.
Results
WEAVER ET AL.
Results 2
HBOT: 25%
NBO: 46%
WEAVER ET AL.
Conclusion
# to treat = 5
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Weaver et al.
treatment regimens
number of rxs: ?
QUESTIONS?