Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.15.00087
Paper 1500087
Received 31/12/2015
Accepted 01/02/2016
Keywords: brickwork & masonry/energy conservation/
materials technology
Sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA), which is generally landfilled, was characterised on the basis of its physico-chemical
properties. The characterisation proved its suitability as a pozzolanic material. SBA bricks were then fabricated
incorporating quarry dust as fine aggregate and lime as a binder. The developed SBA bricks were tested for their
physico-mechanical and thermo-physical properties in accordance with Indian standards. The physico-mechanical
results showed that the SBA bricks were light in weight and met the necessary strength requirements. To analyse the
indoor temperature of the developed material over conventional commercially available material, building simulation
models were developed using TRNSYS software. The building simulation models were created by providing the
thermo-physical properties of the developed SBA bricks and commercially available fly ash (FA) bricks. The simulated
model was executed for annual hourly indoor air temperature against hourly outdoor ambient temperature. The
temperature analysis revealed that the simulated model house constructed with FA bricks was 13% cooler than the
ambient temperature, whereas the simulated model house constructed with SBA bricks was 22% and 10% cooler
than the ambient temperature and the FA brick model, respectively. The obtained results prove that the developed
SBA brick is a novel thermally insulated masonry construction material as compared with the commercially available
masonry product.
1.
Introduction
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
and all the brick samples were similarly prepared. All the
samples of bricks were dried for 3 d, followed by 7 d wet
curing and 7 d sun drying.
2.
2.1
2.2
Test methods
2.3
2
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
3.
3.1
Distribution: %
Specific gravity
Gravel
Sand
Silt
Clay
450
061
7515
2304
120
24
Silicon dioxide:
%
Aluminium oxide:
%
Ferric oxide:
%
Calcium oxide:
%
Magnesium oxide:
%
Sulfur trioxide:
%
LOI:
%
240
334
1475
211
092
890
5950
6000
Intensity: cps
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
200
400
2: degrees
600
800
3
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
1:
0913, 0919, 0986, 0977 and 0976 for 1030% L at an interval of 5% increment, indicating that 20% L compositions are
the most significant. For 20% L compositions, compressive
strength increases with increasing density with a maximum of
659 MPa at 1386 kg/m3.The maximum crushing strength of
the developed SBAQDL brick (mix 24) was double that
of the commercially available burnt clay brick and equal to
that of the commercially available FA brick.
dQ mc dt
dQ
m dt
100
99
Y = 2176%
98
Weight %: (%)
97
Y = 2753%
96
95
Y = 2753%
94
93
92
91
90
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Temperature: C
Heating from 50C to 960C at rate 500C/min
4
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
800
900
1000
Construction Materials
Composition (SBA:QD:L)
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
(90:00:10)
(85:05:10)
(80:10:10)
(75:15:10)
(70:20:10)
(65:25:10)
(60:30:10)
(55:35:10)
(50:40:10)
(85:00:15)
(80:05:15)
(75:10:15)
(70:15:15)
(65:20:15)
(60:25:15)
(55:30:15)
(50:35:15)
(80:00:20)
(75:05:20)
(70:10:20)
(65:15:20)
(60:20:20)
(55:25:20)
(50:30:20)
(75:00:25)
(70:05:25)
(65:10:25)
(60:15:25)
(55:20:25)
(50:25:25)
(70:00:30)
(65:05:30)
(60:10:30)
(55:15:30)
(50:20:30)
Density: kg/m3
1045
1121
1140
1183
1225
1244
1281
1314
1337
1121
1136
1160
1174
1201
1265
1384
1419
1051
1063
1123
1142
1194
1268
1386
1055
1169
1205
1279
1289
1338
1087
1154
1194
1282
1311
296
303
310
316
329
336
336
356
375
323
339
362
369
375
402
422
481
329
369
382
408
432
520
659
332
357
375
400
408
428
382
415
428
468
501
Remark
Design mix with 10% L
3.2
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
10% L
15% L
20% L
25% L
30% L
70
65
R = 0986
60
55
50
R = 0976
R = 0919
45
R = 0977
40
R = 0913
35
30
25
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
Specific density
1300
1350
1400
1450
SBA:QD:L
Thermal
conductivity:
W/m.K
Mix 24
50:30:20
048
Mix 23
Mix 22
Mix 21
Mix 20
Mix 19
Mix 18
55:25:20
60:20:20
65:15:20
70:10:20
75:05:20
80:00:10
0477
0474
047
0465
046
0455
Maximum thermal
conductivity
conductivity, transmissivity etc.), (c) weather data (solar radiation, ambient temperature, wind speed, humidity etc.) and (d)
a buildings usage data (internal gains due to occupants, lighting and equipment, air exchanges etc.). Two software simulation models were developed. One model was considered with
conventional FA bricks and the other with the developed SBA
building bricks. Both the building models were considered to
be non-conditioned. The design variables and weather conditions for both building models were considered to be the
same. Both the buildings were considered to be without any
6
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
Brick
type
Mass, m:
kg
Heat supplied,
dQ: kJ
Initial temperature,
ti: C
Final temperature,
tf: C
Temperature change,
dt: K
Specific heat, c:
kJ/kg.K
SBA
2675
2100
305
3648
598C = 27913K
28125
Type of brick
Burnt clay
FA
SBAQDL (mix 24)
Density:
kg/m3
Compressive
strength:
MPa
Water
absorption:
%
Thermal
conductivity:
W/m.K
Thermal
conductivity:
%
Energy/1000
bricks: GJ
Brick
energy:
%
1600
1800
1386
350
650
659
20
12
20
125
105
0480
100
84
38
4250
2366
2282
100
56
53
7
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
50
Max ambient
Max SBA
Max FA
Min CT
Max CT
45
Temperature: C
40
35
30
25
31-Dec-13
17-Dec-13
3-Dec-13
19-Nov-13
5-Nov-13
22-Oct-13
8-Oct-13
24-Sep-13
10-Sep-13
27-Aug-13
30-Jul-13
13-Aug-13
16-Jul-13
2-Jul-13
18-Jun-13
4-Jun-13
21-May-13
7-May-13
23-Apr-13
9-Apr-13
26-Mar-13
26-Feb-13
12-Mar-13
29-Jan-13
12-Feb-13
1-Jan-13
15
15-Jan-13
20
Date
Average annual
temperature
reduction: C
Particular
Ambient temperature against room air temperature of FA model
Ambient temperature against room air temperature of SBA model
Room air temperature of FA model against room air temperature of SBA model
4
7
3
thus making the SBA brick less thermally conductive than the
FA brick. The energy demand for cooling was minimised
through reduction of the indoor temperature of the built
environment. The maximum outdoor temperature throughout the year was higher than the maximum threshold value of
the comfortable temperature range (Figure 6). Selection of
appropriate construction materials is essential for the control
of temperature inside a building. The simulation analysis
of temperature inside the developed models revealed that
the temperature inside model M1 was low when compared
with model M2, which in turn will reduce the energy demand
for achieving a comfortable indoor temperature.
8
Downloaded by [ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY] on [14/09/16]. Copyright ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Construction Materials
4.
Conclusion
REFERENCES