Professional Documents
Culture Documents
( 1996) 361-364
KrSgel
Abstract
The surface rheological behaviour of spread monolayers of DPPC (L-cY-dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl chinoline) and DMPE (L-a-dimyristoyl
phosphatidyl ethanolamine) on water has been investigated under shear and dilation/compression deformation. Harmonic area perturbations
are performed using an oscillating barrier method which provides information on the monolayer dilational elasticity and the relaxation
processes happening in the monolayers as a function of surface pressure. A surface shear rheometer has been used to measure the surface
shear viscosity and elasticity of the same monolayers. The shear and dilational rheological properties can be explained by the morphology of
the phospholipid monolayers as a function of surface pressure.
Keywords: Phospholipid
monolayers;
1. Introduction
It is well-known that some materials, for example polymeric materials and proteins, form very stiff or extremely
viscous monolayers when they are spread on water [ l-6 I.
Their behaviour is obviously characterised by surface rheology as they possess large shear viscosity and elasticity. This
information is of great help in understanding the stability of
such films during the transfer process to solid supports.
Phospholipids are organic amphiphilic molecule with two
aliphatic chains connected by a hydrophilic group. They can
be anchored at an air-water interface to form a well-defined
monolayer. Traditionally
they are regarded as models for
biological membranes [ 71. Numerous investigations on these
monolayers or their mixture have been performed. Many
characterisations,
such as isotherms at various temperatures
[ 81, surface nucleation in compression and expansion [ 93,
growth or decay of a phase [lo], morphology of domain
structure in the phase coexistence range [ 11,121, etc., have
been carried out.
Only very little work has been made so far in understanding
the mechanical properties of such monolayers. These properties are particularly important from an application point of
view. To know the surface viscoelastic behaviour of a film to
be transferred to a solid support for the purpose of various
optic and electronic devices would be advantageous.
relaxation
2. Experimental
details
* Corresponding
author.
0040~6090/96/$15.00
0 1996 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved
SSDIOO40-6090(95)08342-l
(1)
362
3. Results
The PA isotherms of DPPC and DMPE are shown in
Fig. 1. The shape of the two isotherms show differences as
discussed by other workers in the literature but both exhibit
a.well-established coexistence region.
The surface shear viscosity data for DPPC and DMPE are
show in Fig. 2 as a function of surface pressure rr. The determined shear elasticities were independent of the surface pressure and close to zero and not shown here. At small surface
pressure the shear viscosity is close to zero. With increasing
r-values the viscosity increases first almost linearly and
then abruptly to reach a plateau value at very high surface
pressures.
40-
Ed + iwr],
2.
2
E zoY
IO-
o-
(2)
+,.,.,.,.,.,.
The dilational elasticity Ed is obtained from the surface pressure amplitude [ 171 and the surface dilational viscosity vd is
given by [ 251
40
50
60
70
Area
80
90
( AZ/Molec.)
(3)
Here o is the circular frequency of the barrier oscillation, and
0 is the phase shift between an extra peak produced by the
excenter moving the oscillating barrier and the maximum in
the surface pressure response.
The phospholipids were spread OF the modified film balance as usual. 20 min after spreading the film was compressed
to a definite film pressure IT. Via an electromagnet a second
barrier was placed onto the monolayer at a definite distance
to the force balance. The second barrier is moved periodically
wilh an amplitude of 15 mm and a frequency of 0.1 Hz.
2.3. Material
2000
z
t
10
15
20
25
30
3s
40
45
140-
r700
J
I
120-
- 600
a
so0
B
5.
- 400 ::
%.
u"
- 300 g
z
f
b
:: 602.
5
40-
- 2olJ -i!
20-
- 100
OI
.,.,.,.I.(
.I.
6
s
pressure(mNlm)
10
12
14
as a
363
Acknowledgements
01
10
12
IJO
14
pressure (mN/m)
as a
References
The dilational elasticity and the phase angle, expressed as
dilational viscosity, of DMPE and DPPC are given in Fig. 3
and Fig. 4, respectively. All measurements were performed
at 21 C which allows a direct comparison of the results.
4. Discussion
The shear viscosity is only insignificantly changed up to
the end of the coexistence region. Beyond this point the shear
viscosity increases linearly. For the DMPE an abrupt further
increase to very high viscosity values is observed after the
transition point from a liquid condensed (LC) to a solid-like
state at a pressure of about rr= 21 mN m-i. For the DPPC a
similar behaviour is observed. Although a transition from the
LC phase to a solid-like film at about r= 32 mN m- has
364
Amsterdam, 1995.
[181J. Kriagel, S. Siegel, R. Miller, M. Born and K.-H. Schano, Col1oid.s
Surfaces A, 91 (1994)
169.
(1972) 2129.
[24] J. Lucassen, and D.J. Giles, Chem. Sot. Faraday Trans. 1.71 ( 1975)
. .._
Ll/.
[26] P. Joos, M. Van Uffelen and G. Serrien, J. Colfoid Interface Sci.. 152
(1992) 521.