Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We have already studied in detail the various limitations and criticisms of the Marginal
Productivity Theory as a general principle of distribution. With reference to its application to
wages, we may repeat that the theory is true only under certain assumptions such as perfect
competition, perfect mobility of labour from employment to employment, homogeneous
character of all labour, constant rates of interest and rent and given prices of the product. It is
a static theory.
The actual world is dynamic. All the factors assumed to be constant are in fact constantly
changing, competition is never perfect; mobility of labour is restricted for various reasons; all
labour is not of the same grade, remuneration to other factors of production does not remain
constant; and the prices of the products of labour vary. All these changes modify the theory
when applied to actual conditions. The theory, however, as an assertion of a tendency is true
and is valuable in understanding the basic forces that determine wage rates.
In the actual world, owing to the absence of the above assumptions, there is no single rate of
wages that may be applicable to all labour of a particular type. Wages differ from place to
place, from person to person and from employment to employment.
The following limitations or points of criticism of the marginal productivity theory may
now be noted:
Firstly, this theory has little applicability to reality:
The labour is not perfectly mobile. Workers of the same skill and efficiency may not receive
the same wages at two different places.
Secondly:
Though the condition of a large number of independent sellers is fulfilled for a few industries
of all countries and for most industries of some countries, the employers usually combine to
the disadvantage of the workers. It is a case of monophony, i.e., one buyer (i.e., the employer)
and many sellers (i.e., workers). The employers succeed in pulling down the wages below the
value of the marginal net product of labour.
If employees are also collectively organized, the wage rates may or may not be equal to the
values of marginal net product of labour in the occupations or industries concerned. The
wages are determined by the relative bargaining strength of the two parties, but will not for a
long time exceed the value of the marginal net product of labour.
Thirdly:
The market for goods is in general characterised by imperfect competition. This also upsets
the theory.
Fourthly:
The productivity of workers is also dependent on factors such as the quality of capital and
efficiency of management. These factors are beyond the control of workers.
Fifthly:
Productivity is also dependent on wages. Low productivity may be the cause of low wages,
which may tell on the efficiency of the worker, lower his standard of living, and ultimately
check the supply of labour. The theory takes the supply of labour for granted.
In short, the marginal productivity theory ignores the effect of wage changes on the supply of
labour, bargaining strength and monopoly conditions, etc.
Conclusion:
In spite of these limitations, it may be said that the marginal productivity theory is more
satisfactory than the earlier theories. It furnishes a more satisfactory explanation of difference
in wages in different countries or at different times in the same country.