slosep Stabe
etl a, Dl (2c02)
CHAPTER 1
THE PRoMISE
OF GLOBAL
INSTITUTIONS
wold economic orler—ae under atack everywhere, Formerty
uneventl meetings af obzcue technocrats dzcasing mandine
subjeess such a concanional loa and trade quotes hive now
become the scene of raging ret bates and hoge demonstrations,
“The protests a the Seale meeting ofthe Worl Tade Organisation
in 1999 were a shock, Since then, the movement has groensxonger
tn the Fry as spread Virully every major meeting of the Inersa-
tional Monetary Fund, the Wosld Bank, andthe Wood Tade Organi-
ration is now the sene of cont and eurmoll. The death of =
protest ia Genos in 2001 was just dhe beginning of what may be
‘any more cstle ia the war azine globalization,
‘Riot and proses agains the polices of nd actions by ina
ons of globalisation ae hardly new, For decades, people in the
developing world have rioted when the auecity progans impored
fon their counties proved to be coo hats, bu their prot were
bagel unheard in the Wes What is new i he wave of protests in
the developed counries,
ase tobe that sabjecs ruc a struct adjust loans (the
progeams that were deviged t help counties adj eo and wertce
‘tiss) and banana quotas (the limits that some Eoropean. coun
[2s ursaucnars—rux Gees symbols oftheimpose on the importing of bananas fom counties othe than thee
fovmer colons) wete of interest only + few: Now sixteen-year-
‘dks for the subuibs have arong opinions on such esoteric
tuts GATT (the General Agreement on Tarif and Trade) and
[NAFTA (ine North American Foe Trade Are, the agreement signed
fn 1992 between Mexico, United Stats, and Canada that allows for
the fete movement of goods, services, and invement—But not
people—among thote counties), Thee protests have provoked an
fevocnous amount of soul-searching fom thoee in powe. Even con
serntiepoltciansaoch as France’ president, Jacques Chia, have
fpesed concern tha globalaton i not making ie beer for
thoe mos jn ned of i promised benefis! tis clear to ales,
eeryone that something ha gone horebly wrong, Also oreright,
fobulzation has become the mos pressing ie of our me, some
thing debated from boardrooms t> op-ed pages and in school all
coverthe weal.
‘Wav fas ctomatization—a force that hat brought 10 much
rod —become so contovera? Opening up t iterations rade
fis helped many counties giow fr more quickly than they would
oterwise hive done, International wade helps economic develop-
Inent when a countrys expors deve is economic growth. Expot=
Ted gromth ws the centerpiece ofthe industrial policy hat enied
such of Asia and lef millions of people there i beer off Beense
of globlation many people in the word now live longer than
bene ad thee andi of living is far better. People in the West
‘may aegud low-paying jobs at Nike at exploitation, bet for many
people in the developing wold, woking ina fictory i 2 fr beter
pion than staying down onthe farm and gowing rice
Globalization has redaced the rere of wolationfltin much ofthe
eeloping world and has given many people in the developing
countries access to knowledge well Beyond the reach of even the
‘wedthies in any country 4 century ago. The aniglotaiztion
proests dhemselves ace a teu ofthis connectednes. Links betwen
ftv in fret parte ofthe worl, patculay chose links forged
through Internet comminiiton, broaght about the presure that
resulted inthe international landmines tresty—depite the oppsi-
Ths Psowus oF Gronas ineitorions ‘
tion of many powesl goverment Signed by 121 counties as of
1997 itredaces the likalhood that children another innocent vie~
tims wil be maimed by mines, Simul, well-orchesrated public pres
se forced the international community to forgive the debe of some
‘ofthe poorest countries. Even when there te negative sides to glob
lization, thee ae ofen benelit. Opening up the Jamaican mak
rarkes to US. import in 1922 may have har ocl dit firmer bot
it ako meant poor chldeencatld get milk more cheaply, New for-
ign firms may hureproteced state-owned enterpries but they can
slko lead co the introduction of new vechnlogis, secs to new mar-
ets, andthe creation of ew indies,
Foreign aid, another aspect ofthe labled worl, for alts fats
sal has broughe benef to milion, on in ways dat have alms
gone unnoticed: guerilla i che Pilppnes were provided jobs by
World Bank-financed projet as they hid dow thei arsirrigation
projects have more than doubled che incomes of frees icky
‘enough to get water; education projects have brought literacy to the
run ates in afew counties AIDS proecs have helped contin the
spread ofthis deadly dase
Those who vilify globalization too ofien ovedook is benefits. But
the proponents of globalization have been, if anything, even more
‘unbulnced:To them, globalization (which eypiclly i aicited with
sccepigtcuraphant capil, American syle) i progres devel-
‘oping countries must accape i if they are to glow and to fight
over effectively. But to many in the developing weil, globalizs-
tior has not broughe the promised economic benefits
A growing divide becween the hives and che have-nots has lft
increasing number in he Thind World indie poverty ving on less
than a dala a day. Depite repeated promises of poverty reduction
made over che ot decade ofthe ewenteth century, the actual
ber of people living in povery has actualy increased by almest 100
milion? This occured st che same time tht total world income
increned by an average of 25 percent anally
In Aftica, the high aspirations following colonial independence
fave been lagely unfilled. Instead, the continent planges deeper
ito misery, as incomes fll nd sandards of ving decline: The hat
won improvements in if expectancy gained inthe past few decadeshae begun to reverse While dhe scourge of AIDS ia he center of|
shes dein, poverty i alo a killer ven countries that have aban-
ded Afican soins, managed to install reasonably honest gov-
treats, balanced thee budgets, and kept fation down find that
they simply cannot atract private investors, Without this investment,
they cannot have susainable growth
if globalization as not eceeded in reducing poverty, nether has
iscceeded in ensuring ability Crise in Asa and in Latin America
have threatened the economies and the subiity of all developing
counties There are fat of final contagion spreading aronnd the
world, dat the collapu of one emerging mazket currency wil mean
that others ills well Fora while, in 1997 and 1998, che Asan crisis
appeared o por threst 1 the entre world economy:
(Globalization andthe intoduction of a market economy his not
reduced the promised revuke in Rus snd most of the otbee
fconomist making the tamiion Som communism to the maket,
‘These counites were told bythe West tar the new economic
tem would bring than wnprectdented prosperity. Instead brought
toprecedented poner ia many repel, for mos of the people the
Imatket economy proved even worse chan their Communist leaders
tnd predicted The contrat between Rania’ anston ss engineered
bythe international economic itations and that of Chins, designed
by ite coulé not be greater; While fn 1990 Chioa’ ross domestic
product (GDP) was 60 percent tha of Raia by the end ofthe decade
{he numbers had been revered, While Rusia sw an unprecedented
increas in poetry, Chia saw an unprecedented decrease.
“The crits of globalization accuse Western countries of hypoctny,
and the crits ate right. The Wescern countries have pushed poor
Countries to eliminate wade bari, but kept up thee own bari,
preventing developing countries from exporting thee agriulural
ppodiucs and 30 depriving them of desperately needed export
tncome- The United States wat, of cours one ofthe prime culprits,
snc his was an se about which 1 fk intersel When Iwas cha
man ofthe Council of Beonomic Advises, | fought hard agains his
ype, at had my predecewor tthe Council fons both parts. It
not only hut the developing countries; it ako cost Americans bit
lion of dolla, both a consumer, inthe higher prices dhey paid and
‘Dus Prone oF Groza. ri
2 taxpayers, to finance the huge arial subsidies ‘The struggles
swell too often, untuccesfil. Special commeril and Snail
inneessprevled—and whea I moved overt he World Bank, [ssw
the consequences to the developing counties all oo cles.
Bat even when not guy of bypociny the West has dive che
sloklzaionagends ensuring that gamer a caproporionae she
‘ofthe beneis, 2 the expente ofthe developing worl, wae not just
that the more advanced indorcal countries declined to open up
thie matkets tothe goods ofthe developing coustiea—for instance,
-eeping thie quotas on 2 muittde of goods fom textes sugat—
‘while ining thae chore countses open up dir markets so the
ood of the wealthier counties it was not just thit the more
advanced industrial counties contised to subsidies agricul,
making it dificult for the developing counties to compet, while
insning that che developing counties eliminate their wbiies om
indasial goods. Looking atthe "terms of tade"™—the pices which
developed and lew developed counties get for the product they
roduce—afir the lst trade aprement in 1995 (the eight) the ner
cefect was to lower the prices rome of the poorest counties in the
‘woud received rebaive to what they puid for their imposts* The
resus tha some ofthe poorest countries inthe wodd were se
ally made worse of
‘Western banks benefited fom the loosening of pital market,
controls in Latin America and Asa but toe repion steed when
Inflows of speculative hot money (Soney sat comes into and out of
2 country, offen overnight offen isle more than betting on whether
‘currency it gong to appreciate or depreciate) tht ad posted into
countries suddenly revened. The sbrape outow of money le
Deind copied cuzrencies and weakened banking stems. The
‘Uruguay Round abo sengthened inelectual propety righ
‘his eth neem ref ngetinin ced the UnguyRad
‘cae the egos began 986 oP dal Ea, Uru The mtd we
coca in Mach on Decne 1,198 when 117 conten jon
Sn by Pret into 09 Dever 8, 1994 The Wot Take Opa
‘ar et onal et muy 11995, ne 10 sansa igre ob
Jar One pon othe aetna comeing he GATT i i WT[American and other Wester drag companies could now sop drug
companies in fnda and Bra fom "sealing thie intellectual prop
tty But these drag companies inthe developing word were making
these Hife-sving drags aaabe to tei eizens ata action of the
price a which the drugs were sold bythe Western drug companies
‘There were ehus two sider tothe decors made nthe Uruguay
Round Profs ofthe Western drug companies would go up. Advo~
cates sid this would provide them more incentive to innovate; but
the increased profits im ale in the developing woeld were sal,
Since fw could afford the dry, and hence the incentive effet, at
best might be limited. The other side was that thousands were fc
threly condemned to death, becse goverment and individ in
‘veloping cousuies could no longer pay the high prices demanded.
Tethe cate of AIDS, che iterations oatage was great chat drug
companies had to back down, eventually agreing to lower cir
rcs to sell the deugs corn ate 201. But the nderiying prob
Jemrthe fact thatthe intlecrl property regime exahed ver
the Uropusy Round wis not balanced, hat ic overwhelmingly
‘decd the interests and perspectives ofthe producers, a opposed
to the wer, whether in developed or developing countrer—rerain,
‘Not only in ede liberalization but ia every other aspect of
gobalation even seemingly well-intentioned effors hive often
Incite When projects, whether agicultore or infasructe ee-
commended bythe West, designed wi the advice of Western avis
fa and financed by the World Bank or others have filed, unless
there is ome form of debt forgiveness, the poor people in the devel
ping wold ail mt repay the loans
in too many instance, the benefits of globalization hive been
Jes than its advocates claim, the prize paid has been greater, a the
environment has been exroyed, politcal proceses have been co
rupted, and asthe pid pace of change has not allowed counties
time for eultrl adaptation, The eres chat have brought in eit
sake masive unemployment have, intr, been fllowed by longer~
term problems of socal disoltion fom wan violence jn Latin
[America to ehnic conflicts in other pats of the world, such as
Indonesia
‘These problems are hardly nes—bur the increasingly vehement
“Tae Prone or Grosas tnstirurions ‘
worldwide reaction agains che polices chat dsive globalization is a
significant change, For decades, the cries of the poor in Aiea and in
Seveloping coustses in other parte of the world have been largely
‘unheard in de West Tove wh labored inthe developing counties,
new something wis wiong when they sw financier
ing more commonglice snd the umber: of poor increasing. Bue
they had no ay to change che ules ot influence the interasonal
financial instotons tht wrote them. Those who valued democratic
procenes sx how “conditional” —the conditions chat interna-
tonal leaders imposed in return for their asitunce—undermined
‘atonal sovereignty. But until de protestors came along there was
Title hope for change and no ove: fr complaint Ser ofthe pi
tenors went fo excess; sme of the potesors were arguing for
higher protectionist buries agaist the developing counties, which
‘would have made thir plight even wore. But despite these prob
len, iis the tide unionis, aden, ervionmentaite—owinary
ciisene—matching inthe ret of Prague, Sate, Wasington, and
Genoa who have put the need for reform on the agenda of the
developed word
Protestors ee globalization ina very dierent light than the tea
sry secretary ofthe United States, o the finance and rade ministers
fof most ofthe advanced industrial counties The dierence in views
ae 40 get that one wonders ae the protestors and the policy mak
ces taling boot the same phenomnent? Ate they looking at che sme
(43? Are the visions of thot in power so clouded by special and pat-
‘nla interest?
"What is chi phenomenon of elobalization that hasbeen subject, at
the same tine, to suc vilficstion and such peie? Fundamentally it
isthe closer integration ofthe counties and peoples of the wos
‘which as been bought abou by the enormous reduction of eats of
‘eansportation and comminication, andthe breaking down of arf
al barter to the flow of good, services, capi, knowledge, and
(to a lester extent) people acow border. Globalization has been
sccompaied by the eestion of new inttations that have join
‘vith exiting ones to work acom borders In the azna of iter
tional cil soci, new groups, lke che Jubilee movement pushing
for debe reduction for the poorest countries, have joined long-» Guonauzation ayn Irs Disconrenrs
estahished ongiizations like the International Red Cros. Gobalzs
tion is powerilly driven by imernatioal corporations, which
‘move not only epi std goode azo borders bu ao technology.
Globalization has avo lef renewed attention to long-establitied
‘nceeationa nteevenmevtlintatons the United Nations, which
attempts fo maintain peice; the Internation! Labor Organization
{HO}, oviginally erste in 1919, which promocesits agenda around
the world under is logan “decent work"; and the Wosld Health
(Organization (WHO), which has been epecially concerned with
improving health conditions in the developing would
‘Many, pethaps most of these pects of globazaion have been
welcomed everywhere, No one wants to see their chill die, when
Enowledge and medicines ae avaiable somewhere el in the world
Tei the more narrowly defined como specs of globalization that
Inve been the subject of contovesy, and the international istita~
tions eat ave writen the ele, which mandate or posh things ike
Iiberization of capital martes (the ciminsion ofthe roles and reg~
uibtions in many developing countries that ate designed ro tbilize
the flows of woe money into and out of the county)
“Tp understand what went vz0ng, ih imporaat to look athe
thvce min institutions that govern globalization: the IME, the Wood
Bank, and the WTO, There ae, in adtion, 2 host of other insita~
‘ions that playa roe in the international economic systema mint
ber of regional bak, muller and younger ster othe World Bank,
anu lange number of UN organizations, suchas the UN Develop
tment Program of the UN Conférence on Tae and Development
(UNCTAD) These organizations offen have views that are markedly
tert fom the IMF and the Word Bank-The ILO. for example,
‘worries thatthe IME pays wo litle attention to worker righ,
wile the Asan Development Bank argues for “competitive phir
fam! whereby developing counties will be provided with akernative
views of development emtegie, including the “Asin model"—in
Which governments, while relying on makes, bave taken an active
tole in creating, shaping, and guiding matkes, including promoting
new technologies andi hich ims take considerable responsitlity
forthe social welfare of tei employses—which the Asian Develop
“Tun Peouase of Gionat heresrunIONe "
model
iment Bank sets a diinely diferent fom the Ame
prshed by the Wishington-bused insitutions
‘In this book, I focus oly on the IMF and che World Bank,
largely beaut they have been a the center of the major economic
Inne of the la two decades, incding the financial crises and
‘tanstion ofthe forsee Common countries to maket economies
"The IMF and the World Bank both originated in Would War Ifa 2
result of the UN Monetary and Financia! Confrence at Breton
‘Woot, New Hampi in July 1946, part of concerted effort 2
finance the rebuilding of Euiope ater the devastation of Would Wac
I and to sive the world fom future economic depresions. The
proper mame of the World Bank—the laerasional Bak for Recon-
Seretion and Development—refects itt origin ison; the last
pat, “Development” wat added slo a an afterthought Ar the
time, most of the counties in the developing wosld were ssl
colonies, and what meager economic development efor could or
fwould be undertaken were considered the responsibility of their
European master
"The more difcl ak of ensuring global economic sabilty was
signed to the IME Those who coavened at Breton Woods had the
‘lob depresion of the 1930s very mich on their minds. Almost
thuce quatters of century ago, eptlio fred 8 mos severe crisis
to dae The Gren Deprestion eavloped the whole warld and led to
unprecedented incener in unemployment. Ar the worst point 2
‘garter of America? workforce wat unemployed: The British econo-
inst John Maynatd Keyues, who would later be a key pattcipane at
Breton Woods, pu forvad imple explanation, anda corespond
ingly simple set of prteripions ck of saicient aggregate demand
explained economic downturn; government policies could help
ssilate aggregate demand. In cass where monetary policy is ine
fective, goreenments could zly on fiscal policies, ether by increasing
expenditures orcutng axes. While the models undelying Keynes’
alysis ave subeequendly been eritiized and refined, bringing a
Geeper undettanding of why market forces do not work quickly to
adjst the econonty to fll employment, the bai lens remain
vali® Guonauizavion ano Urs Dscowrsnrs
‘The Ineernitional Monetary Fund was charged with preventing
another global depression. Fe would do this by puting internavonal
pressore on counfres hat were not dong cher fe sate to main
tlobal azaregite demand, by allowing their own economies to go
Jno alam. When necesary i¢ would alo provide liquidity in the
form of leas to dhe counties facing an economie downturn and
‘unable wo stimulate aggregate demand with their own resources.
Ins original conception, then, the IME was based on a recogni-
sion that markets ofen didnot wesk well—that chy cou resale in
ase unemployment and might fil to make needed finds avai
thle fo counries to help them rextor thei economies The IME wt
founded on the belief that Uhre was a need for collet ation a the
lll eel for economic sabi, uta the United Nations had been
founded on the bli that there was a need for collective action at
‘he global level for political sibility-The IMF i a pubic insiuion,
‘rablshed with money provided by txpayers around the wodld. This
is important co eemember because i doer not zeport dicctly
ther the citizens who finance i or thve whove lives ie aes.
Rather report to che minisvies of finance and the cena banks of|
the governments of the wodd, They asert their control through =
complicated voting arrangement based largely on the economic
‘power ofthe countries atthe end of World Wer I There have been
some minor adjatmens since, but the major developed countries
run the show with only one country. the United Sexes having effec
tive veto, (In thir vente, i sina to che UN, where a historical
anachroniim determines who holds che veto—the victorious powers
‘of Wodid Wir Iba ale there che veto power i shared among
five counsies)
‘Oter the yeas since its inception the IMF has changed marked.
Founded on che belief chat mackts ofien worked badly, it now
champion market supremacy with ideological ferws, Founded on
the bli that chere i a ee fr international pres on counties,
to have more expstsionary economic polces—such a increasing
expenditures, reducing tas, oF lowering interes rates to stimulate
the economsy—today the IMF typically provides funds only if conn
tees engage in policies Hike cuting defi, ean taxes, oF rising
‘Tas Puowass of Grosas Insrrevions »
inert rites that lead to 4 contraction of the economy. Keynes
‘would be roling over in his grave were he to se what has happened
tobi child,
‘The mort dramatic change in thee inwions occursed in the
1980s, the er when Ronald Reagan and Marguee Thatcher
preached fice market ideology inthe United States andthe United
‘Kingdom. The IMF and the World Bank became the new misionary
“nsitutions,erough which thee idess were pushed on the relecant
poor counties that ofen badly needed theit lane and gant. The
rinses of finance in poor countries were willing to become coo
rneceisiry to obtain the find, chough the vse majority of
government ofc, and, more to the point, people in these coun=
{ees often remzined skepcal tn che eat 1980s, purge cecurred
inside che Wood Bank, in its esearch department, which guided the
Bank’ thinking and ection Hols Chenery one of America’ most