Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 1
Land evaluation
planning.
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 2
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 3
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 4
What are the policies influencing the land use, land quality
and productivity?
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 5
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 6
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 7
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 8
Nick Milham, Jason Crean and Rajinder Pal Singh(2011) The implications of policy settings on land use and agricultural technology adoption in North-West India.
55th Annual AARES National Conference Melbourne, Victoria, 8-11 February 2011
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 9
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 10
KARNATAKA AGRICULTURE
Human population of 52.7 M
( 5.1 % of India)
Livestock population of
30.7 M ( 6.8 % of India)
Urban population 34 %
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 11
KARNATAKA AGRICULTURE
G. C. Area is 123.07 lakh ha
Kharif season (64%), in Rabi
(30%) and summer (6%)
Irrigation 22 lakh ha (20.5%)
State produces 100 lakh t (5 % to
National Food)
Agricultural contributes 21 per
cent to SGDP .
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 12
Marginal
Small
(< 1 Ha.)
(1-2 Ha.)
Semi
Medium Medium
(2-4 Ha.)
(4-10 Ha.)
Large
(>10 Ha.)
%
%
% % %
%
%
%
%
Region
No. Area No. Area No. Area % No. Area No. Area
Karnataka 48.2 13.3 26.6 23.2 16.9 28.0 7.3 25.9 1.0 9.6
Large number are marginal land holdings
Contributing 40 % of food production
Page 13
Kolar
2.98
3.00
Karnataka
2.73
2.41
1.63
1.15
1.04
1995-96
1.21
1.15
1.36
1.28
1.50
1.74
1.46
1.35
1980-81
1.95
1990-91
1.72
1.82
1976-77
2.13
1.6
1.61
1.81
1.74
1.88
1.86
2.50
2.00
Bangalore
1.00
0.50
2005-06
2000-01
1985-86
1970-71
0.00
Environmental stress-48 %
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 15
Increasing
employment and
income of
farmers
NBSS&LUP 2012
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 17
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 18
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 19
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 20
Revenue lands,
Private lands,
Panchayat lands and
Forest lands necessary in different districts of the state.
Necessary amendments to section 79(a), 79(b) and 80 of the
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 21
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 22
Agricultural
Horticulture
Animal Husbandry
Fisheries
Karnataka State Land Use Board (KSLUB, 2001): Perspective Land
Use Plan for Karnataka 2025 Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.
How much it is implemented ? and What is the impact ?
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 23
Institutional Setup
Ministry of Forest
Water Resources
Mining
Electricity
Public Work Department
Commodity Boards
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 24
Objectives
Globalization of
agriculture sectors
(WTO)
Increasing in food
production
(NFSM, NHM
RKVY, OPE)
( + )= Increase
Likely Impact
( - )=Decrease
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 25
Policies implemented
Policies
Objectives
Likely Impact
Irrigation Development
Savalu-Javalu
Jalasamvardana Yojane
Page 26
Policies implemented
Policies
Objectives
Likely Impact
Agricultural Price
Support (MSP)
Ensuring remunerative
prices
Agricultural Input
Subsidies
(Fertilizer Policy,
Rural electrification)
Forest development
(JFPM, Farm
forestry)
Conservation and
expansion of forest
(+) increasing
biodiversity
Source :Dept. Agriculture, GOK
Page 27
Policies implemented
Policies
Objectives
Likely Impact
Agricultural Credit
policy (3 % interest)
Agricultural Labour
policy (MGNREGA)
Increase farm
investment
Increase rural
employment and income
(+) improved
land management
(-) labour availability and
shift in land use from
annual to perennials crops.
Page 28
Policies implemented
Policies
Objectives
Likely Impact
Urban and
infrastructural
development
(KIADB Land Bank)
Diversion of good
agricultural land for non
agricultural use
(-) water resources for agil.
(+) soil and water pollution
Diversion of forest land for
industries and mining
Mining pollution affect
agricultural yield
Page 29
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 30
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 31
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 32
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 33
12/13/2012
Page 34
Soils Chemical
Characteristics
Soils Physical
Characteristics
for classification
Soil color
Mottling
Drainage
Soil depth
Soil texture
Coarse fragments
Structure
Concretions/nodules
Shrink-swell properties
13/12/2012
Sodicity
NBSS&LUP 2012
Soil pH
EC
CEC
Soil Organic carbon
Available N
Available P
Available K
Available Fe
Available z
Available Cu
Available Mn
Sheet erosion
Page 35
Indicators of Change:
Land use and productivity
Livelihood security
* Exit from agriculture
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 36
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 37
Identification of Stakeholders
Land Category
1.Forests
Reserved
Protected
Unclassified
2. Not available for
cultivation
Land under non-agricultural
use
3. Barren & unculturable
land
Definition
Depart
ment
Type of
Controls
Forests include all lands classed as forest under any legal enactment dealing with forests or
administered as forests.
Forests
This category included all lands occupied by buildings, roads & railways or under water, e.g. rivers &
canals, & other lands put to uses other than agricultural.
Revenue
Proprietorship,
Management, Use
Regulation, Control
over Access
Proprietorship, Use
Regulation
This category covers all barren & unculturable lands, including mountains, deserts, etc. which
cannot be brought under cultivation, except at a high cost, is classed as unculturable, whether such
land is in isolated blocks or within cultivated holdings.
This category covers all grazing lands whether they are permanent pastures or meadows or not.
Village commons & grazing lands are included under this category.
Under this class is included all cultivable land which is not included under the net area sown, but is
put to some agricultural use.
6. Cultivable wasteland
Revenue
Proprietorship, Use
Regulation
Agriculture
Indirect Regulation
This category includes all lands available for cultivation, whether taken up for cultivation or not
taken up for cultivation once, but not cultivated during the current years & the last 5 years or more
in succession. Such lands may be either fallow or covered with shrubs & jungles, which are not put
to any use.
This class comprises cropped areas, which are kept fallow during the current years only. For
example, if any seedling area is not cropped again in the same year, it may be treated as current
fallow.
This term denotes the net area sown under crops & orchards, counting areas sown more than once
in the same year only once.
Agriculture
Indirect Regulation
Net sown area (including area under miscellaneous tree crops) and current fallow
private
property
resource
non-owners do not
have access
7. Current fallows
?
Panchayat
?
Use Regulation
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 38
1991
3075
1192
801
1097
316
445
431
984
10709
12393
1683
19050
% to
TGA
16.14
6.26
4.21
5.76
1.66
2.34
2.26
5.17
56.22
65.06
8.84
Change
2009 % to TGA
3072
16.13
1375
7.22
788
4.13
923
4.85
290
1.52
413
2.17
513
2.69
1482
7.78
10195
53.52
12368
64.93
2173
11.41
19050
1991-2009
-2.96
183.42
-13.43
-173.36
-26.16
-32.26
81.39
497.72
-514.37
-24.45
489.92
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 39
2009
6000
5436.342
5,372
6,273
7000
5000
4000
3221.122
2,088
3000
2000
1753.835
1000
0
Cereals and Millets
13/12/2012
Pulses
NBSS&LUP 2012
Oilseeds
Page 40
Land Use
Forests
Non Agricultural Use
Barren and Uncultivable
Permanent Pastures
Miscellaneous Trees
Cultivable Waste Land
Fallow Lands
Current Fallow Lands
Net Sown Area
Gross Cropped Area
A. Sown More than Once
TGA
13/12/2012
1991
154.9
194
106.6
158
42.6
23.3
27.9
111.5
763.6
826.1
62.5
1582
% to
TGA
9.79
12.26
6.74
9.99
2.69
1.47
1.76
7.05
48.27
52.22
3.95
NBSS&LUP 2012
Change
2009
151.6
237.9
103.6
22.1
133.1
35.1
119
36.8
738.2
766.5
28.3
1582
% to
TGA 1991-2009
9.58
-3.3
15.04
43.9
6.55
-2.99
1.39 -135.93
8.42
90.54
2.22
11.75
7.52
91.11
2.33
-74.71
46.66
-25.43
48.45
-59.67
1.79
-34.24
Page 41
2009
600
535
500
432
400
324
300
200
165
86
100
64
0
Cereals and Millets
13/12/2012
Pulses
NBSS&LUP 2012
Oilseeds
Page 42
35000
30000
25440
40000
33506
2000-2001
2010-2011
25000
194
204
10
38
2605
2567
161
576
415
5149
6158
1009
3210
4251
1041
5000
655
1000
10000
6248
7596
15000
Area (ha)
Land Use
Change
20000
-10000
-8066
-5000
-345
-1348
-15000
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 43
2
1
90%
80%
Per cent to total area
10
0
1
Clay
20
Slight(< 5t/ha)
100%
Sandy clay
70%
6
2
50%
Sandy Clay
Loam
Loamy Sand
40%
30%
21
20%
22
Sandy Loam
10%
90%
60%
80%
70%
60%
18
29
50%
40%
30%
20%
16
12
10%
0%
Baseline-1996
Present level-2012
Time (Years)
1992
13/12/2012
Severe(15-40 t/ha)
0%
Baseline-1996
Present level-2012
Time(Years)
1998
NBSS&LUP 2012
2012
Page 44
Ragi
Paddy
Total food crops
Vegetables
Flowers
Guava
Grapes
Mango
Coconut
Banana
Total horticultural crops
Eucalyptus
Casurina
Total agro-forestry
Fallow land
Total cultivable land
Change 1980-2002
(in ha)
Total
Annual
change
-185.59
-8.44
3.96
0.18
-181.63
-8.26
-24.97
-1.14
6.28
0.29
31.94
1.45
69.26
3.15
-1.35
-0.06
34.9
1.59
18.03
0.82
134.09
6.1
-11.75
-0.53
-12.95
-0.59
-24.7
-2.37
-17.66
-0.8
-89.91
-4.09
Page 45
NPK(Kg/ha)
1980
Cereals
Fruits
Vegetables
Crops
2002
Flower
Mean
Page 46
Source
2002
No. in Area
use
Change
No. in Area
irrigated(ac) use
No. in Area
Irrigated
(ac)
use
irrigated(ac)
Open well
Marginal farmers
2.5
-2
-2.5
Small farmers
8.75
-6
-8.75
Large farmers
-3
-5
Marginal Farmers
27
40.8
38
56
11
15.2
Small Farmers
26
56
55
86
29
30
Large farmers
52
171
111
180
59
9.5
Tube well
Page 47
Erosion
Slight
Moderate
Sever
1980 2002
(%) (%) Change
-2.3
36.8 34.5
8.9
56.3 65.2
-6.6
6.9
0.3
Page 48
1980 2002
(%) (%) Change
0
38.3
38.3
7.1
11.4
4.3
17.5
19
1.5
57
23.8
-33.2
0.6
7.4
6.8
Page 49
1980 2002
% to % to Change
Total Total (%)
SOC
Low
( < 1 kg m-2 ) 10.5 13.5
Medium
(1-2 kg m-2) 31.9 30.4
High
( > 2 kg m-2) 57.7 56.1
-1.5
-1.6
Page 50
79.64
288
15928
115159
30263
218802
380
761
Page 51
1980
Income
(Rs)
%
2002
Income
(Rs)
Change
Income
(Rs)
%
Crop production
10000.24
33.54
15301.80
41.09
5301.56
6.92
Agril Labour
2794.61
9.37
3098.67
8.32
304.06
-0.40
Sheep rearing
4948.57
16.60
5251.36
14.10
302.79
-2.11
Dairy enterprise
6949.08
23.31
9116.13
24.48
2167.06
0.94
Sericulture
1890.94
6.34
0.00
0.00
-1890.94
-6.31
Business
1795.13
6.02
2732.67
7.34
937.54
1.02
Govt Service
1263.07
4.24
1514.67
4.07
251.60
-0.12
Rural artisans
174.60
0.59
223.69
0.60
49.09
0.06
Total income
29816.23
100.00
37238.99
100.00
7422.76
Page 52
=(7422-761)
Sustainable Farm Household Income(Rs)= 6661 Per ha.
FHI= Farm Household Income
COSD= Cost of Soil Degradation
Page 53
Crop Requirement
Annual rainfall
Soil Depth
Soil Texture
Soil Drainage
Soil Slope
Soil pH
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Optimum condition
2000 to 4000 mm
>75 cm
Loam
Well drained
<5%
5.6- 7.5
Page 54
Taluka
Aurad
Basavakalyana
Bhalki
Bidar
Humnabad
BIDAR Total
Not suit
Suit_ini
Suit_lii
1225
0
857
337
1053
38
630
250
480
494
4245
1119
0
0
0
0
0
0
45000
Year 2
10500
Year 3
Year 4
12400
Source : NABARD
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 55
14700
State wise area under oil palm cultivation (2004) Source :WWF- India
12/13/2012
Page 56
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 58
THANK YOU
13/12/2012
NBSS&LUP 2012
Page 59