Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.5923/j.ijee.20130302.03
Abstract Permanent magnet synchronous generators (PMSGs) have a bright prospect in the small wind turbine (WT)
applications; PMSGs co mpared to the conventional electrically excitated generators have many advantages, thats why they
have attracted many and a strong interest of research. In this paper, a co mparative PMSG performance study's is presented,
these performances is studied as a function of physical material like the type of permanent magnet (high, poor, average
and linear), as a function of the environ mental conditions as rotor speed, finally, as a function of the design and
geometrical parameters (rotor length, number of poles, nu mber of stator slots). These results are obtained by finite element
method (FEM ); this approach is a powerful and useful tool to study and design PMSGs, as represented in this paper.
Keywords Cogging Torque, Finite Element Analysis, PMSG, Nu mber of Poles, Nu mber of Stator Slot, Wind Energy
stress and optimized power capture. Because of the variab le The application requirement decides the type of PM
speed operation, the direct-drive PM SG system can produce material used due to cost, size and weight. It is very
510% mo re energy than the fixed two-speed concept, or important to consider operating temperature range, weight
10 15% more than the fixed single-speed concept[8]. constraint, external demagnetizing field and space
Co mpared to a conventional, gearbox coupled WT limitat ion at design stage itself. Co mmercial type PMM
generator, directly coupled generators has a series of uses ceramic or poly merbonded neodymiu miron boron
advantages, such as a much reduced size o f the overall magnets[7].
system, a rather lo w installation and maintenance cost, The first known apparatus exp loiting magnetism was a
flexib le control method, quick response to the wind magnetic co mpass, invented by the Chinese around 3000
fluctuation and load variations, etc. However, a directly BC. An important milestone in the research field of
coupled generator needs to have a very lo w-speed operation magnetis m was set in 1600 when William Gilbert published
to match the WT speed and, at the same time, to produce his book De Magnete[9]. Fig. 2 shows the historical
electricity in a normal frequency range (10-60 Hz)[7]. development of the rare earth magnets.
Co mpared with electrically excited machines, PM SG In 1931 T. M ishima patented the first hard magnetic alloy,
have a number o f economical and technical advantages, so based on alu min iu m, nickel and iron. Th is was the start of
that they are becoming more attractive for direct-d rive WTs, the development of the PM family known as AlNiCo. In the
these advantages can be summarised as follows according 1950s, another PM family, known as ferrites, became
to literatures[58]: commercially available. The development of rare earth PM
higher efficiency and energy yield, materials started in the 1960s with the Samariu m-Cobalt
no additional power supply for the magnet field alloys. The material properties of SmCo 5 and Sm2Co 17
excitation, make these PM materials very suitable to be used in electric
imp rovement in the thermal characteristics of the motors and generators, but they are expensive due to the
PMM due to the absence of the field losses, rare raw material Cobalt[9].
higher reliability due to the absence of mechanical
components such as slip rings,
lighter and therefore h igher power to weight ratio.
However, PMMs have some d isadvantages, which can be
summarised as follows:
Relatively new and unknown technology for
applications in larger MW-range
high cost of PM material,
difficult ies to handle in manufacture,
Low material reliability in harsh atmospheric
conditions (offshore)
demagnetisation of PM at high temperature.
On the other hand, in recent years, the use of PMs is
more attractive than before, because the performance of
PMs is improving and the cost of PM is decreasing[8]. Figure 2. Historical development of the rare earth magnets[9]
Currently, Zephyros (currently Harakosan) and
Mitsubishi are using this concept in 2 MW WTs in the In 1983 is the most important development in PM used in
market. PMM it is the invention of the high-performance
PMM are not standard off-the-shelf mach ines and they Neodymiu m-Iron-Boron (Nd -Fe-B), since that, the
allo w a great deal of flexibility in their geo metry, so that development of the PMSM has been fast, especially
various topologies may be used[8]. low-speed and variable speed industrial applications[9], this
One can noticed two p roblems of PMSG used in wind material has a very lo w Curie temperature and high
power. First is the inherent cogging torque due to magnet temperature sensitivity. It is often necessary to increase the
materials naturally attractive force. This kind of torque is size of magnets to avoid demagnetizat ion at high
bad for operation, especially stopping WT starting and temperatures and high currents[10], Recently, Nd-Fe-B
making noise and vibration in regular operation. The other magnet material with remanence a flu x density Br of 1.52 T
one is the risk of demagnetization because of fault and a maximu m energy product of 440 kJ/ m3 was reported.
happening and overheating of magnets. This risk is very An Nd-Fe-B magnet material of this grade has become
dangerous and the cost for replacing bad magnets is much commercially available since the year 2004.The best
higher than the generator itself[5]. Nd-Fe-B grades, capable of tolerating temperatures up to
200, have remanence flu x densities of about 1.2 T and
have their maximu m energy product of 300 kJ/ m3 at a 20C
3. PM Material Used in PMSG Design temperature[9].
International Journal of Energy Engineering 2013, 3(2): 55-64 57
Power [KW]
in study and design PMSGs[11-12], Fu rthermore, o wing to
4
its precision and simplicity, the two-d imensional (2-D)
FEM has approximately do minated the FEM study of 3
400
Maxwe1l2D, Th is simulat ion is obtained by Terra pc
(QuadroFX380, i7 CPU, 3.07 GHZ, 8 CPU, 4 G RAM), and 200
-400
-600
-800
100
Induced Phase Voltage [V]
-50
The permanent-magnetic steel symbolized (XG196/ 96),
possesses residual flu x density 0.96 Tesla, coercive force -100
690 kA/ m, maximu m magnetic energy p roduct 183 kJ/ m3, -150
ciramic8d 1KW, the bad is Alnico 5 0,5 KW. Figure 6. Induced phase voltage vs electrical degree at different PM
58 H. M ellah et al.: Simulations Analysis with Comparative Study of a PM SG Performances for
Small WT Application by FEM
0.2 -300
2000
400 1900
1800
1700
300 1600
1500
1400
200 1300
1200
1000
One Conductor Voltage[mV]
100 800
500
-100
-200
-300
-400
50
40
30
20
10
We can notice the influence of the rotational speed on the power in the figure 11, one can see clearly that the relation
between speed and the power is proportional, but the curvatures are similar, the maximu m of power provided by PMSG is
7.8 KW corresponds at the speed 2000rp m, and the minimu m equal to 2.69 KW corresponds at the speed 800rp m.
Power at different Speed
8
2000
1900
1800
7 1700
1600
1500
1400
6
1300
1200
1000
5 800
500
AirGapPower [KW]
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Angle[deg]
X: 2000
Y: 108
8 Z: 7.811
5
Pow [KW]
0
200
150
2000
100
1500
50
Andeg 1000 Speed
0
-50 500
Fig. 12 depicts three-dimensional representation in terms capacity. Pulsating torques also produces noise and
of the power for our PMSG. The results show the power mechanical v ibrations which accelerate the wear of the
become higher as the rotational speed increase. mach ine and its support structure[14].
Fig. 13 shows simu ltaneously the effect of rotor speed on The simu lation results of cogging torque for six PM SG
the power and the efficiency of PMSG, an increasing in rotor structures; when one varies only the nu mber o f poles by the
speed of the PMSG which is turned by the turbine causes an FEA are shown in figure 15, one can see clearly that the
increasing in the power and the output at the same time. number of poles influence direct ly the cogging torque in
5.3. Rotor Length pulsations and magnitudes.
The following figure show the effect of the number of
Fig. 14 illustrate simultaneously the power and the stator slots on cogging torque, according to our results one
efficiency vs rotor length, the power increases almost can say that the increase in number of stator slots gives an
linearly with the increasing of rotor length, but the efficiency
increase in amp litude of cogging torque, but does not change
increases nonlinearly with the increasing of the rotor length
its frequency as we can equally be observed.
up to the value 60mm, because the active surface was
Fig. 17 shows the efficiency as a function of electrical
increased, practically the efficiency is constant between
degree and the number of poles, no variation of curvatures is
60mm and 70mm, the efficiency decreases if the length of
remarked, but a variation in amp litude is found, or the
the rotor is increased because the rotor is longer than the
efficiency increases by 76.9% to 86% for the increase in
stator, so more the losses additive.
number of poles fro m 2 to 10 respectively.
5.4. Infl uence of pole-Number on PMS G Characteristics On the other hand the efficiency decreases if the number
Cogging torque is due to the non-uniformity of the airgap of poles increases; the efficiency reached the value 84.8% if
reluctance due to slotting. It is independent of current the number of poles is 14.
excitation and proportional to the square of the The variation power of PM SG as a function of number of
flu x-density[14], this is particularly important in wind poles and mechanical angle is showed in figure 18, it is
generators since it raises the cut-in wind speed, thereby noticed that the wave form is similar, but one sees a power
lowering the energy captured yield for a given installed peak of 7KW if our PMSG designed by 8 nu mber of poles.
International Journal of Energy Engineering 2013, 3(2): 55-64 61
100
90
80
70
60
Efficiency %
50
40
30
2000
20 1800
1600
10 1400
1200
0
1000
8 800 Speed
7
6 600
5
4
3 400
Power[KW] 2
1 200
0
Figure 13. Comparison results of the speed effect on efficiency and power
9000 100
Power
Efficiency
8000
7000
%
6000
5000
Power [W]
50
4000
3000
2000
1000
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Lenght [mm]
2P
600 4P
6P
8P
400 10P
14P
200
Cogging Torque[mNm]
-200
-400
-600
200
100
Cooging Torque[mNm]
-100
-200
-300
-400
100
80
60
Effi %
40
20
5
4
Pow[KW] 3
2 140 160
100 120
60 80
1 20 40
-20 0
Ang [deg]
Figure 17. A comparative curve of PMSG efficiency's as a function of number of stator pair poles and rotor electrical degree
4
Power[KW]
5 200
4 150
p 100
3
50
2 ang[deg]
0
1
Figure 18. A comparative curve of PMSG power's as a function of number of stator pair poles and rotor electrical degree
64 H. M ellah et al.: Simulations Analysis with Comparative Study of a PM SG Performances for
Small WT Application by FEM
[2] I. Woofenden, w ind power for dummies, Wiley Publishing, [14] J. G. Wanjiku, H. Jagau, M . A. Khan, and P. S. Barendse,
2009. M inimization of Cogging Torque in a Small Axial-Flux
PM SG with a Parallel-teeth Stator, IEEE 2011.
[3] A. Petersson, Analysis, M odeling and Control of Doubly-Fed
Induction Generators for Wind Turbines, PhD thesis,
Chalmers university of technology, Gteborg, Sweden 2005.