You are on page 1of 1

3.9.

4 Plant Availablity

Failure Rate MTTR Not working time Sets Unavailability Availability Remarks
(time/year) (h) (h/year) (%) (%)
Major Failure Random Trips Major Failure Random Trips
Centrifugal Chiller
Electric Motor Driven Compressors 0.588 0.249 12 13 10.29 0.118% 99.883%
Exchanger 0.078 4.2 0.33 0.004% 99.996%
Primary Chilled Wate Pump 0.347 0.079 18 13 7.27 0.083% 99.917%
Cooling Water Pump 0.347 0.079 18 13 7.27 0.083% 99.917%
Cooling Tower 0.220 0.121 13 9.9 4.06 0.046% 99.954%
Total for one chiller train 0.333% 99.667%
Maintenance for one chiller train 1 168 168.00 1.918% 98.082% (Note 1)
As chiller system 32 0.001% 99.999% (Note 2)

Secondary Chilled Water Pump 0.347 0.079 18 13 7.27 0.083% 99.917%


Maintenance for one pump 1 24 24.00 0.274% 99.726%
As secondary pump system 18 0.000% 100.000%

Heat Exchanger 0.078 4.2 0.33 0.004% 99.996%


Control Valve 0.023 3.4 0.08 0.001% 99.999%
As one HEX + valve 0.005% 99.995%
As CHWS customer station 2 0.000% 100.000%

Power Supply (OSBL) 0.036 0.6 0.02 0.000% 100.000% (Note 3)


As power supply (OSBL) system 2 0.000% 100.000% (Note 4)

On site power supply facilities 0.050 8 0.40 0.005% 99.995% (Note 5)


On site power supply system 0.005% 99.995%

As total system 0.005% 99.995%


* Failure rate and MTTR data is obtained from OREDA-2009, Centrifugal chiller is calculated as combination of Electric Motor Driven Compressor & Exchanger.

Note 1: Actual chiller maintenance duration is to be confirmed with vendor.


Note 2: During maintenance of one set of chiller, 2 sets of chillers failure cause the lack of supply capacity.
Excepting above period, 3 sets of chillers failure cause the lack of supply capacity.
Note 3: Based on System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) & System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) from 2005 to 2010, issued by EMA
Note 4: 2 incoming feeders are considered as coming from independent power sources.
Note 5: Not based on actual study, based on engineering judgement.

You might also like