20170213-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J

Page 1
Coroner Sara Hinchey J 13-2-2017

Coroners Court of Victoria
5 65 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, VIC 3006
Phone: 1300 309 519 Calling from overseas: (+61 3) 8688 0700
Fax: 1300 546 989
General enquires (including submissions of all Forms): courtadmin@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
Coronial Admissions and Enquires Office: cae@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
10
Ref: 20170213-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J
Madam,
never mind my self-professed crummy English (as English is not my native language) as
15 what is important is what I am writing about and how to try to avoid any repeat of a carnage, let
alone a repeat that may affect thousands.
In view where I specifically warned politicians including Prime Minister Mr Malcolm Turnbull
and Premier Mr Daniel Andrews in my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE (besides others about
20 the same) about my understanding Bourke Street Mall being a target for people wanting to
kill as many people as possible and even recommended buffers/bollard to be installed yet no
appropriate action was forthcoming which could have in my view avoided the carnage that
eventuated in Bourke Street now the subject of a coronial inquiry, then I view it appropriate to
make my submission.
25 Due to the extent of matters I covered this submission will be of some length to include relevant
details, albeit a long history of my writings will not be included as to similar Bourke Street
warnings, but could be provided on request.
QUOTE from my 15-7-2016 PRESS RELEASE (reproduced below)
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the
30 constitution.
Seeing the pictures beamed from Nice, France about the carnage one obviously wonder
how on earth could this have happened. Why were there no road blocks in place to prevent
this? I understood some decades ago a person making known how easy it would be to drive
a gas tanker into Bourke Street Mall, Melbourne, and blow it up, causing huge casualties.
35 It was not a person who had any terrorist connections. What we have done is politicians
like John Howard, Tony Abbott, Julie bishop Senator George Brandis, and heaps others
including the then General Peter Cosgrove defying constitutional limitations/prohibitions
as I view it, going out bigtime onto mass murder, crimes against humanity, terrorism, war
crimes, etc in Iraq and well nothing was done to hold them legally accountable. Little
40 wonder that there are elements who then hold it they will pursue their reign of terror in
response. Politicians will tell people to go on normally, while they DONT because they
are hiding behind a curtain of security so that they are safe and let the innocent citizen
suffer the horrors inflicted upon them. Politicians are the cowards who claimed to make
the world a safer place while in fact making it far worse.
45 Nice clearly lacked proper security as to prevent a truck to enter where people had their
festivities. Then one has to look upon any major city and wonder is the same possible in
Page 1 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
Page 2
Australia, and regretfully this is possible. Take Bourke Street, Melbourne, where it is a
pedestrian mall but the trams are going through it and so delivery vans/trucks. Instead of
warmongering politicians hiding behind a security curtain the monies of this security
curtain would be better spend such as road buffers to be fitted into the ground. For
5 example to prevent a truck to enter a mall using the tram tracks a heavy duty buffer is
coming up after a tram has passed through preventing any vehicle to enter using the tram
tack. This steel buffer can be raised and lowered into the ground as to allow safe passage
for trams and emergency vehicles but not for other vehicles unless someone with security
clearance were to manually let the buffer to sink into the ground for any delivery vehicle to
10 enter. It means that in times of public celebrations those buffers can be raised above ground
and so become a security for those celeb rating in the area. Such kind of devices could be
fitted on any road where at times it requires to be closed of regarding sporting events,
parades, etc. A proper system would facilitate such buffers to prevent motorist to use tram
tracks while the tram can engage the buffer to be lowered when it comes nearby so the tram
15 can pass through. This is the kind of security system that should exist at the very least. To
expect a police officer facing a truck coming towards him to stop it is lunacy. There must
be a system of buffer that can be sufficient to stop a heavy truck in its tracks and prevent
what eventuated in Nice to eventuate in Australia. Instead of having bollard or other
material transported to and from the area, by building buffers that can drop down into the
20 ground when not needed or obstructing otherwise a tram from passing, this would be a far
better manner. I understand that in some countries they use massive kind of buffers to
redirect the sea flow to avoid floodings. The shape is like that of a sliced of an orange
hinging at the thinner edge. Also, we had this media report that some person allegedly
heavily involve in preaching jihad or at least promoting issue to it nevertheless continue
25 to do so. I view that any person doing so should be deemed to place national security of
citizens at risk and by this should be charged accordingly.
END QUOTE from my 15-7-2016 PRESS RELEASE (reproduced below)
Some background and further details, etc.

30 I in 1982 being aware of the grievances of many I commenced a special lifeline service under the
motto MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL, a service without ever being financial
supported by any Government. The obvious issue was that many were aggrieved but simply
couldnt find any resolve to their grievances and so contemplated not just suicide but even
murder/mass murder.
35 Let me give you an example unrelated to the Bourke Street incident showing why someone can
be deprived of appropriate assistance but needs it. Due to confidentiality I will not refer to the
persons identity without being given authorisation to do so.
Person call him David, not his real name, was aggrieved that his wife had gone to live with
another man and so took their children with her and he held that it was better to kill his youngest
40 child (not being an adult) than to grow up in what he considered an immoral household in view
of his religious beliefs.
He approached me wanting to gain access for the purpose to kill his son as he held and genuinely
believed so that it was better for his son to die then to grow up in an immoral household, etc. Fast
forwards 20 years and well he ended up himself in the kind of immoral household situation he
45 had so deplored of his former wife and he gave me the understanding he was glad I was there to
bring him through his difficult time, in the way I had done so, and that I had let him make the
decision in the end not killing his son. He gave me the understanding that had I argued against
him doing so he certainly would have done so but my tactic was to let him understand it was the
wrong thing to do. And this is how at times I would deal with people contacting me, not to tell
50 them Dont do it but rather give them the understanding and let them make their own decision
not to proceed.

Page 3
People in an erratic state of mind will not listen to someone, no matter how well meant not to do
some evil act but rather they need support for someone to understand the grievances they are
having and then let them understand how to manage it and overcome it all.
Above all they need for themselves to make the decision not to proceed with any murderous
5 plan, as being told not to do it will more than likely be to ensure they will do it.
To give you another example:
Mr Francis James Colosimo (I have his consent to reveal his identity) represented by a barrister
was placed under Administration upon expert medical advice that he couldnt manage certain
10 personal matters not accepting he was convicted for CONTEMPT OF COURT, etc. In December
2008 he requested that I as a CONSTITUTIONALIST and Professional Advocate was to take
over matters both regarding the appeal against the Orders of Administration and the
CONTEMPT OF COURT matters. I made clear I\ would do so, as always, free of charge but he
needed to tell me the truth and provide all relevant details. Without going in every little detail I
15 successfully appealed the Orders of Administration as well as had any proceedings permanently
stayed by Her Honour Harbison J. Acritical error was that the Office of the Public Advocate had
misled the experts witnesses as to Mr Francis James Colosimo having been convicted of
CONTEMPT OF COURT but refusing to accept this and hence the experts held Mr Francis
Colosimo was unable to manage his affairs. The truth was that Her Honour Harbison J in
20 transcript stated that she didnt convict Mr Francis James Colosimo, when I asked Her Honour to
clarify what Her Honour had dealt with in the previous 5 CONTEMPT OF COURT hearings!
Her Honour, also upon my submission to be provided copies of the 6 hearings transcripts
(including the one I then represented Mr Francis James Colosimo) free of charge made such
order. Subsequently I discovered that at no time was Mr Francis James Colosimo formally
25 charged with CONTEMPT OF COURT. Moreover, the council that had pursued Mr Francis
James Colosimo had in December issued a revocation of a building order regarding a shed (that
previously had been registered as a shed with another council) and this revocation included that
the shed Mr Francis James Colosimo was building was complying with building regulations, etc.
Yet about 1 week after the issue of this Notice the same council then engaged lawyers to pursue
30 Mr Francis James Colosimo.
Of the more than 20 lawyers involved in the cases over the years not a single one had realised
that Mr Colosimo was never formally charged. Neither that there was never any legal grounds to
charge him in the first place. And when council sought to withdraw the CONTEMPT OF
COURT Her Honour Harbison J in her judgment agreed that it couldnt do so once filed. There
35 were a litany of other legal issues and yet for the lawyers involved they never seemed to grasp
this. Even Victoria Legal Aid in their correspondence recommended Mr James Francis Colosimo
to purge his contempt. What contempt if he was never even formally charged and none existed?
And this is one of the reasons why innocent people are ending up being convicted, when they do
not have the ability to have a person like myself willing to assist/represent them free of charge
40 and who is able to get through the rot and expose it all for what it is.
Then you may end with a person who may contemplate suicide and even murder/mass murder
because their lives could have been utterly destroyed no matter their total innocence.
Another example is that when I was residing in Berriwillock, unexpected I had a woman
45 knocking on my door who had travelled more than 350 kilometres and highly agitated claimed an
expert witness had lied in court, etc. She handed me court recordings to listen to it. I did and
explained to the woman that this councillor merely had stated his expert opinion and while he
might have been wrong in facts or whatever it was his opinion and it was for her barrister to have
cross examined this expert witness on anything adverse to her.
50 And this is one of the major problems why people are getting more and more upset, because
there really is no one who bothers like myself to spend a lot of time going through the details and
even willing to assist/represent in court matters free of charge.
Page 4
INSPECTOR-RIKATI on the battle SCHOREL-HLAVKA v BLACKSHIRTS

For the quest of JUSTICE, in different ways. Book on CD.
ISBN 0-9580569-4-3 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-4-6
5
This book sets out some of the problems and why people seek to resort to violence, etc.
What needs to be looked at is the driver who was using the motor vehicle what did preceded to
this carnage! What was the history of the person that he so to say is getting into some trance
10 possibly wanting to kill as many innocent people as he can totally remote from any feelings to
the harm he is inflicting.
What did anyone do prior to that event to try to provide some resolve to his problems?
Over the decades I assist numerous parties in Family Court of Australia litigation and regretfully
15 found that the system is simply not working properly at all. When a woman is able to get judges
for more than 10 years to protect her against her former husband against child abuse allegations
and finally the Children Court then remove children from her care because of the proven
violence towards the children, even an attempt to strangle one of them, and breaking a cricket bat
on another child and the police simply despite numerous neighbours complaints never did
20 anything to secure the children, then surely we got a problem in the system.
When a mother fabricates child abuse allegations against the father, but only after gaining
custody then conceded she had it all fabricated, one has to ask; What is this falsely accused father
going through? The system simply is not capable to appropriately deal with those people grieving
for v various reasons.
25 For the record when the mother gave me the understanding she had fabricated the sexual abuse
allegations I was at least able to ensure the father obtained interim custody, this while he had all
along been represented by lawyers, they simply lost his case.
Mr Michael Alderton ended up hanging himself in Pentridge having been imprisoned regarding
30 the car he drove into the glass plated windows in 1994 at 570 Bourke Street, Melbourne. On a
visit to the prison I was given the understanding he simply didnt remember anything from the
moment he went into the car. I understood from his lawyer (the next day at the hearing) that Mr
Michael Alderton would plea guilty as then he likely could be released, whereas if he pleaded not
guilty the magistrate might sentence him to 6months or more imprisonment. Mr Michael
35 Alderton relied upon his lawyers advise and decided not to plea NOT GUILTY (as he intended)
but GUILTY so he could be free. Well, the magistrate instead ordered a term of imprisonment
that Mr Michael Alderton, as I recall, then refused to talk to his lawyer for having allegedly lied
to him. As I understood it from Mr Michael Alderton, all he wanted was to see his children, and
well ending locked up suicide seemed to him to be the only way to resolve it.
40
Mr John Murray Abbott (BLACKSHIRTS) is another clear example who kindly stated hated the
courts and the judges involved, when, despite that he had complied with the court order, the
Registrar nevertheless sold his property in violation of the court orders. Later on 25 October
1994 the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia acknowledged his property shouldnt have
45 been sold but it had no powers against the Registrar on an appeal.
Others are told they need to pay thousands of dollars for an appeal when in fact a Registrars
decision can be reviewed. Here we had a man having his dream home sold for so to say peanuts
leaving him with a debt when the Registrar violated a court order and yet never held legally
accountable for it.
50 These are mere some incidents out of countless others to indicate that the issue is not if a person
rightly or wrongly might be aggrieved but that there appears to me no proper system in place to
deal with those kind of people. Worse is that in Family Law issues often the children are
suffering considerable and this while the judges pretend to look after the interest and wellbeing
of the child an ill-conceived argument when in reality they leave the children for year after year
Page 5
in the torturous conditions of the custodial parent, that finally the Children Court steps in to deal
with it.
The Commonwealth made a big mistake to take me on about FAILING TO VOTE, because as a
5 CONSTITUTIONALIST I did extensively research matters and well was waiting for them to
make this error. On appeal on 129 July 2006 the County court of Victoria set aside in both
appeals the convictions, citing the prosecution did not submit any supporting evidence and that
they neither challenged any of my written submission (very extensively) on constitutional
grounds that compulsory voting was unconstitutional. Many others with highly paid lawyers
10 failed in their attempts. This is because as lawyers they interpret the constitution as they learned
in legal education and practice rather than to consider the true meaning and application as to
what it means for the unlettered man. Judicial officers therefore are having the view that
compulsory voting is legal and themselves may because of that vote as such as well as convict
others, regardless that I proved otherwise in the courts. As such, this underlines that the judiciary
15 are misconceiving what the rule of law actually stands for. The constitution was not specifically
written to suit me and so it either applies to all citizens or none.
As I also successfully proved (Magistrates Court of Victoria at Heidelberg 4-8-2015) that the
provision of averment is unconstitutional, as the Magistrate made clear that the Commonwealth
had to provide evidence. Yet, in other cases the judiciary simply will enforce averment as rule of
20 law despite of my success otherwise.
This means that there is a lack within the judiciary to pass on in a system what was ordered so
that other judicial officers are immediately altered to the ruling.
Having set out the above to some extend but seeking to keep it to a minimum for now, I will now
25 go back to the Bourke Street carnage having perhaps given you some back ground as to why
people may lose any felling of compassion when they are out in killing innocent people. And as
for all those decades I was very successful never to have had a person proceedings with their
suicide/murder/mass murder intentions (Mr Michael Alderton was not in contact with me after
the sentence due to prison restrictions- and so his suicide in prison was beyond me) it certainly
30 must underline that no matter how different I may conduct matters I have very positive results
and this without ever having charged any person for my self-incurred cost nor having had any
government funding in that regard. And I do at times have people contacting me thanking me for
having been there when they needed someone to talk to and they are now doing my work to
assist others free of charge. That to me is the best reward I can hope for.
35
I will now about to commence to deal with some of my PRESS RELEASES and other
communications received albeit find that as the Minister of Police really is making clear that she
embarks to continue upon the same rather than have learned from the event and I view, more
than likely, we may see a repeat on a grand scale. My suggestion for Prime Minister Mr Malcolm
40 Turnbull, Premier Mr Daniel Andrews and Lord Mayor Mr Robert Doyle to get together in a
meeting to discuss matters appears not to have been accepted/acknowledged. As such while we
have both Prime Minister Mr Malcolm Turnbull, Premier Mr Daniel Andrews are both in the
news as to condolences (to me mere photo opportunities) they still refuse to actually address the
core problems or even to discuss them. Hence, I view it is critical that the coroner will call a
45 spade a spade and not try to be politically correct not wanting to somehow criticise someone or
some persons that really should be blamed for what eventuated. If you are not even willing to
deal with the core problems then you will never resolve the spade of violence. Our politicians
seems to be of a lot of talk but of very little constructive action.
As I proved in the Colosimo case not only the lawyers (including the judiciary) never understood
50 what the case was about but also the 2 medical expert witnesses were providing their opinion on
basis of court decisions that proved never to exist, merely going along with whatever the office
of the Public Advocate had claimed and likewise of Victoria Legal Aid. Yet in September 2009,
Page 6
when Mr Francis James Colosimo complained about the strain upon him of subjected to the
litigation, one judicial officer then made a verbal attack upon Mr Colosimo that he was the one
who got himself convicted for CONTEMPT OF COURT (This even so on 16 March 2009 Her
Honour Harbison J already had made clear (and so recorded in transcript) that Mr Francis James
5 Colosimo had not at all been convicted of CONTEMPT OF COURT!). And it may be noted that
twice, once in court Mr Francis James Colosimo was suffering of a suspected heart attack that
the court room was cleared and the presiding judiciary officer didnt bother to call any medical
assistance but left me with Mr Francis James Colosimo, and even the opponent lawyers refused
to assist (having gone outside the court room) so I had to run around organising medical
10 assistance and in the end an Ambulance took Mr Francis James Colosimo to hospital.
.
As I widely wrote about this former Perin Court and now Infringement court system is
unconstitutional but I will not delve into the details of it. Safe to say that innocent people are
subjected to orders of an Infringement Court that has no constitutional validity. Moreover, as was
15 proven with N.S.W. drivers more than 2,000 of them had (Victorian) Infringement Notices
issued against them even so afterwards it was detected that they had accessed the wrong data
base and so none of those N.S.W. drivers had failed to pay the alleged road tolls.
The saying of; Control we have a problem/malfunction, would be an understatement about the
20 purported legal system.
We need to have a complete new look how it operates and not by lawyers who themselves cannot
recognise what is wrong with the system as they have grown into this system as being correct,
regardless of its numerous problems.
We do not need politicians telling us, as they do ongoing with every election, they will fix
25 education, health, crime issues, etc, because at the next election they repeat the same as some
broken record. What is needed is an honest review about the entire legal system and how it
operates and a supporting serviced like what I have provided since 1982 as in the long run the
cost of such system is a lot cheaper than the monies involved to investigate any
suicide/murder/mass murder.
30 QUOTE 21 December 2016 PRESS RELEASE
ISSUE: 20161221 - Re THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution-supplement

constitution.
35 Despite my 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re
THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution (Cowards hiding
behind security while leaving the public at risk for their warmongering. The documents can be
downloaded from: https://www.scribd.com/document/318379891/20160715-Press-Release-Mr-
g-h-Schorel-hlavka-o-w-b-Issue-Re-the-Failure-in-National-Security-Etc-the-Constitution) it
40 appears to me that basically nothing noticeable has eventuated to protect citizens while shopping.
The latest killings in Berlin with a truck may underline we do not want State/Federal
governments to wait until such killing spree eventuates in Australia but that we want is pre-
emptive security measures to prevent such to eventuate in Australia. For example ban trucks
during certain hours to enter places where lots of people gather. Erect removable pillars that can
45 be put up during peak shopping hours. Place removable pillars around places of gathering like
markets, so the same cannot be done in Australia. Having removable pillars means they can be
securely locked during peak times and removed outside such hours to allow ordinary movement
of traffic. Keep in mind it is not just a truck as any motor vehicle driven into people can cause
considerable harm and even death.
50
Politicians and in particular Ministers are on a yearly pay and so forget about blatant ignorance to
the safety of the community, now is the time to be pro-active in ensuring the security is not in
question, neither that of the possible victims.
Page 7
It are in my view the politicians who got us in this danger by unconstitutionally invading Iraq,
etc, and well I view any politician failing to act now and any citizen were to die as result then
should be charged with manslaughter at the very least. Again, they are getting paid to do a job so
5 it is well overdue they finally do this and if not they should suffer the legal consequences.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)
10 END QUOTE 21 December 2016 PRESS RELEASE
QUOTE 20 January 2017 PRESS RELEASE
ISSUE: 20170120 - Re THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, 3 avoidable deaths, etc & the constitution
15 As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the

constitution.
Last Sunday, I was walking amongst the crowd at Thomastown Sunday market when I noticed a
seller packing up get in his car and simply reverse. I yelled out as his rear bumper bar was about
20 8cm from a stand. I stopped people walking and then was assisting the driver to reverse, etc, to
get out. Within Minutes I noticed large van reversing and again I had to stop people from
walking. While Thomastown Marker has been operating for decades it appeared to me there is
simply no system to arrange for a staff member to assist a seller to leave with a motor vehicle,
which ordinary are parked at the stand. Many children and the elderly are walking there also and
25 yet the lack of proper assistance as astounding to me. Worse is that the main gate usually is left
wide open. This means anyone can drive in and deliberately smashes into people. Nothing to stop
a would-be murderer to mow down innocent people. No bollard, etc.
And then we have where for some about 6 months I have been warning both the Federal and state
governments about bollards, etc. Specifically I referred to Bourke Street, this as more than 20
30 years I then already warned that this could be for a would-be killer to target innocent people.
QUOTE from 16-7-2016 Email reproduced below
In view of the Nice event your idea to have security bollards and barriers
installed throughout Melbourne in strategic locations vulnerable to terrorist
attacks, should be taken seriously by the state government. Politicians are
35 often complacent and are forced to act in the public interest only after a
major tragedy or catastrophe has occurred.
QUOTE from 16-7-2016 Email reproduced below
Cowards hiding behind security while leaving the public at risk for their warmongering.
40 The documents can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/318379891/20160715-Press-Release-Mr-g-h-Schorel-hlavka-o-w-b-Issue-
Re-the-Failure-in-National-Security-Etc-the-Constitution
ISSUE: 20160715 - Re THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution
QUOTE 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE FAILURE IN
45 NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution
Nice clearly lacked proper security as to prevent a truck to enter where people had their festivities. Then one
has to look upon any major city and wonder is the same possible in Australia, and regretfully this is possible.
Take Bourke Street, Melbourne, where it is a pedestrian mall but the trams are going through it and so
delivery vans/trucks. Instead of warmongering politicians hiding behind a security curtain the monies of this
50 security curtain would be better spend such as road buffers to be fitted into the ground. For example to
prevent a truck to enter a mall using the tram tracks a heavy duty buffer is coming up after a tram has passed
through preventing any vehicle to enter using the tram tack. This steel buffer can be raised and lowered into
the ground as to allow safe passage for trams and emergency vehicles but not for other vehicles unless
someone with security clearance were to manually let the buffer to sink into the ground for any delivery
55 vehicle to enter. It means that in times of public celebrations those buffers can be raised above ground and so
become a security for those celeb rating in the area. Such kind of devices could be fitted on any road where at
times it requires to be closed of regarding sporting events, parades, etc. A proper system would facilitate such

Page 8
buffers to prevent motorist to use tram tracks while the tram can engage the buffer to be lowered when it
comes nearby so the tram can pass through. This is the kind of security system that should exist at the very
least. To expect a police officer facing a truck coming towards him to stop it is lunacy. There must be a
system of buffer that can be sufficient to stop a heavy truck in its tracks and prevent what eventuated in Nice
5 to eventuate in Australia. Instead of having bollard or other material transported to and from the area, by
building buffers that can drop down into the ground when not needed or obstructing otherwise a tram from
passing, this would be a far better manner. I understand that in some countries they use massive kind of
buffers to redirect the sea flow to avoid floodings. The shape is like that of a sliced of an orange hinging at
the thinner edge. Also, we had this media report that some person allegedly heavily involve in preaching
10 jihad or at least promoting issue to it nevertheless continue to do so. I view that any person doing so should
be deemed to place national security of citizens at risk and by this should be charged accordingly
END QUOTE 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE FAILURE IN
NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution
15 This was repeated in:

The documents can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/324869383/20160922-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
B-ISSUE-Banning-Islamic-Headdress-The-Niqab-and-Burka-Etc-the-Constitution
ISSUE - Banning Islamic Headdress, the Niqab and Burka, etc & the constitution?
20
And again referred to in:
QUOTE 20161227-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE FAILURE IN
NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution-supplement 3
As I previous indicated the Governments should use bollards to protect citizens at places they gather but I am
25 not aware this was done appropriately, albeit the Australian Parliament did make sure it get a 2.6 metres
fence and update AFP security so they are more protected.
QUOTE 21-12-2016 press release

Despite my 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE
30 FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution (Cowards hiding behind security
while leaving the public at risk for their warmongering. The documents can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/318379891/20160715-Press-Release-Mr-g-h-Schorel-hlavka-o-w-
b-Issue-Re-the-Failure-in-National-Security-Etc-the-Constitution) it appears to me that basically
nothing noticeable has eventuated to protect citizens while shopping.
35 END QUOTE 21-12-2016 press release
See also
I view another spin by politicians to protect themselves rather than the public.

https://www.scribd.com/document/334824504/20161222-Press-Release-Mr-g-h-Schorel-hlavka-o-w-b-Issue-
Re-the-Failure-in-National-Security-Etc-the-Constitution-supplement-2
END QUOTE 20161227-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE FAILURE IN
NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution-supplement 3
45
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-20/live-car-hits-pedestrians-in-melbourne-cbd/8197998
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has made a statement in Sydney.
QUOTE
The prayers and heartfelt sympathies of all Australians are with the victims and the families of the victims
50 of this shocking time in Melbourne today
We thank and acknowledge the heroism, the professionalism, of the police and emergency workers who
rushed to the aid of the victims.
55 Joined by bystanders, who mindless of their own danger, sought to help those who had been attacked in this
shocking crime.
Their love, their selflessness, their courage is the very best of Australian spirit.
END QUOTE
60
Easy words for a man who was warned by me for months but ignored it all while making sure
that politicians in Canberra are protected by a reported 2.6 metre high wall, etc. Why were no
Page 9
bollard, etc, fitted to Bourke Street Mall? Surely the cost would have been a lot less than the
security upgrade on Canberra parliament house!
5 QUOTE
Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews wraps things up
Just as a final point, Im proud of all those Victorians who reached out and provided support and care to
strangers. That speaks volumes to the sort of community that we are.
END QUOTE
10
Excuse me, dont include yourself as I view you got blood on your hands, as like Malcolm Turnbull and others
failing to make sure the area was protected. As I understand it Mayor Robert Doyle reportedly made known
that the driver was going to drive into Collin Street (to his observation) but faced with a bollard decided to
drive to Bourke Street instead.
15
QUOTE
Graham Ashton confirms at least 15 other people are injured across many hospitals, including an infant
child in a critical condition.
20 END QUOTE
I have absolutely no doubt that lawyers for the victims will likely question why didnt the
Governments act to secure areas like Bourke Street with bollards, etc.
25 While it might be claimed the alleged offender had mental problems one has to ask is this some
excuse for not providing security that could at a minimal cost have been provided! To the victims
is doesnt matter if the offender is mentally ill or just pursues terrorism for an alleged religious
cause as they are the victims no matter what. Obviously the alleged offender will be entitled to
Legal Aid while the victims have generally no such rights. Little wonder crime is getting out of
30 hand.
Again in my view Premier Daniel Andrews and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull have blood on
their hands as they as a national/state strategy should have ensured that before a Nice/Berlin
event were to occur in Australia appropriate measures were taken to try to prevent this. Well,
they miserably failed but now their political spin is obviously coming while in reality I view they
35 could have avoided it.
QUOTE
Terrorism in Melbourne
Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>
Today at 17:10 (20-1-2017)
40 To
Message body
----- Original Message -----

45 From: adrian barnett
To: AC P
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 4:03 PM
Subject: Terrorism in Melbourne
50 There has just been a big event in Melbourne CBD where a car dropped a wheelie on the corner of
Flinders and Swanson Sts. driving on the 'Footpath' at at Least 60 kmph. killing 3 people. Before
dropping the wheelie the driver yelled out "El Afar". My friend was there at the time and said he was
only 3 meters from the car as it driving along and Saw one of the people killed as he was mown down.
I'm not sure Terrorism is the right word but it's muslims that have done it.
55
It's most likely Timed to exploit the fact that we're in the middle of a Major Tennis Tournament so there
are many tourists here and a lot of TV coverage from around the world.
I think we should thank Turnbull, Dutton and Andrews for Enriching our lives with the 'Diversity' of these
60 people to Australia.
Page 10
END QUOTE
NationStates | The Queendom of El Afar

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=el_afar
5 The Queendom of El Afar is a huge, socially progressive nation, renowned for its irreverence towards
religion. The democratic population of 335 million El ...
QUOTE EMAIL 16-7-2016

Re: see attachment 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G.H. Schorel-Hlavka ISSUE - Re. THE
10 FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc. & the constitution.
Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>
16/07/16 at 1:32 AM
To
Attachments
15 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE FAILURE IN

NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution.pdf
Message body
Gerrit,
20 There are a number of European cities that as part of their urban security, use steel
and reinforced concrete bollards and barriers in front of, and around certain
government and public buildings. Melbourne's CBD uses steel bollards to prevent
vehicles entering numerous one-way streets, alleys and restricted parking and public
areas. I have observed many bank ATMs and certain small businesses (jewellery
25 shops, chemists, alcohol/liquor stores etc.) use steel bollards to deter criminals
performing ram-raids through their front entrances and display windows.
In view of the Nice event your idea to have security bollards and barriers installed
throughout Melbourne in strategic locations vulnerable to terrorist attacks, should be
30 taken seriously by the state government. Politicians are often complacent and are
forced to act in the public interest only after a major tragedy or catastrophe has
occurred.
I doubt a lawsuit would succeed against any state or federal government or individual
35 MP for complicity or liability in mass murder, crimes against humanity, war crimes,
etc. by the grieving families of victims. You know as well as I do the corrupt judiciary
will protect their corrupt political masters, not to mention the high degree of difficulty
in proving an individual MP was somehow involved or responsible for any particular act
of terrorism.
40
Jim
----- Original Message -----

From: Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
45 To: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 10:56 PM
Subject: Fw: see attachment 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
ISSUE - Re. THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc. & the constitution.
50 Let us pursue a better national security before it is too late!
Constitutionalist & Consultant
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

55 Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN
(OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia
Ph (International) 61394577209

Page 11
Email; inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
unless specifically otherwise stated.
5
If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need
to do is to consider the content appropriately!
A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING

10 CONCERNED TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
----- Forwarded Message -----

From: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. < admin@inspector-rikati.com>
To: admin@inspector-rikati.com
15 Sent: Friday, 15 July 2016, 22:51
Subject: see attachment 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re
THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution.
see attachment 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE

20 - Re. THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc. & the constitution.
Cowards hiding behind security while leaving the public at risk for their
warmongering.

https://www.scribd.com/document/318379891/20160715-Press-Release-Mr-g-h-
Schorel-hlavka-o-w-b-Issue-Re-the-Failure-in-National-Security-Etc-the-
Constitution
END QUOTE EMAIL 16-7-2016
30
Obviously the question must be asked why on earth the police didnt stop this person long before
he went on his killing spree, etc, considering reportedly he had stabbed his brother at 2.30am in
the morning! In any event reportedly eyewitness account is that this alleged offender was not
making any attempt to avoid hitting people but deliberately did so. It doesnt to the victims if this
35 person is mentally disturbed or not (one could argue any killer is to some degree) but that that
those in charge/power did absolutely nothing to prevent such a rampage to occur in a busy
shopping mall where had my suggested blocking of access with bollards, etc, been in place the
people now death and injured may never have been. Putting up preventative bollards, etc, would
be a little bit too late, after so to say the horse had bolted.
40
People while arguably mentally ill or not will take examples from Nice/Berlin and may
contemplate doing likewise by whatever might be at hand. It means that those in governments
must pursue to prevent reasonably any such carnage to occur in busy areas. One may ask also
what about the Victorian Market? Is that secure against a would-be killer? I doubt it.
45
Stop talking utter rubbish when in reality you did nothing that could have avoided the carnage!
Statements made for political benefits to perhaps try to cover up for failure to act in my view are
rubbish!
50 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
END QUOTE 20 January 2017 PRESS RELEASE
55 QUOTE 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE

ISSUE: 20160715 - Re THE FAILURE IN NATIONAL SECURITY, etc & the constitution

Page 12

constitution.
Seeing the pictures beamed from Nice, France about the carnage one obviously wonder how on
5 earth could this have happened. Why were there no road blocks in place to prevent this? I
understood some decades ago a person making known how easy it would be to drive a gas tanker
into Bourke Street Mall, Melbourne, and blow it up, causing huge casualties. It was not a person
who had any terrorist connections. What we have done is politicians like John Howard, Tony
Abbott, Julie bishop Senator George Brandis, and heaps others including the then General Peter
10 Cosgrove defying constitutional limitations/prohibitions as I view it, going out bigtime onto mass
murder, crimes against humanity, terrorism, war crimes, etc in Iraq and well nothing was done to
hold them legally accountable. Little wonder that there are elements who then hold it they will
pursue their reign of terror in response. Politicians will tell people to go on normally, while they
DONT because they are hiding behind a curtain of security so that they are safe and let the
15 innocent citizen suffer the horrors inflicted upon them. Politicians are the cowards who
claimed to make the world a safer place while in fact making it far worse.
Nice clearly lacked proper security as to prevent a truck to enter where people had their
festivities. Then one has to look upon any major city and wonder is the same possible in
Australia, and regretfully this is possible. Take Bourke Street, Melbourne, where it is a
20 pedestrian mall but the trams are going through it and so delivery vans/trucks. Instead of
warmongering politicians hiding behind a security curtain the monies of this security curtain
would be better spend such as road buffers to be fitted into the ground. For example to prevent a
truck to enter a mall using the tram tracks a heavy duty buffer is coming up after a tram has
passed through preventing any vehicle to enter using the tram tack. This steel buffer can be
25 raised and lowered into the ground as to allow safe passage for trams and emergency vehicles but
not for other vehicles unless someone with security clearance were to manually let the buffer to
sink into the ground for any delivery vehicle to enter. It means that in times of public
celebrations those buffers can be raised above ground and so become a security for those celeb
rating in the area. Such kind of devices could be fitted on any road where at times it requires to
30 be closed of regarding sporting events, parades, etc. A proper system would facilitate such
buffers to prevent motorist to use tram tracks while the tram can engage the buffer to be lowered
when it comes nearby so the tram can pass through. This is the kind of security system that
should exist at the very least. To expect a police officer facing a truck coming towards him to
stop it is lunacy. There must be a system of buffer that can be sufficient to stop a heavy truck in
35 its tracks and prevent what eventuated in Nice to eventuate in Australia. Instead of having bollard
or other material transported to and from the area, by building buffers that can drop down into
the ground when not needed or obstructing otherwise a tram from passing, this would be a far
better manner. I understand that in some countries they use massive kind of buffers to redirect
the sea flow to avoid floodings. The shape is like that of a sliced of an orange hinging at the
40 thinner edge. Also, we had this media report that some person allegedly heavily involve in
preaching jihad or at least promoting issue to it nevertheless continue to do so. I view that any
person doing so should be deemed to place national security of citizens at risk and by this should
be charged accordingly.
No excuses as a purported religious freedom, because s116 was never for this to be used!
45
Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
Convention)
QUOTE
Sir EDWARD BRADDON (Tasmania).-I have an amendment to move on behalf of Tasmania, and also an
50 amendment of my own. The clause we have before us says that a state shall not make any law prohibiting the
free exercise of any religion. It is quite possible that this might make lawfull practices which would otherwise
be strictly prohibited. Take, for instance, the Hindoos. One of their religious rites is the "suttee," and

Page 13
another is the "churruck,"-one meaning simply murder, and the other barbarous cruelty, to the
devotees who offer themselves for the sacrifice.
Dr. COCKBURN.-The Thugs are a religious sect.
Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Yes. If this is to be the law, these people will be able to practise the rites
5 of their religion, and the amendment I have to suggest is the insertion of some such words as these:-
But shall prevent the performance of any such religious rites, as are of a cruel or demoralizing
character or contrary to the law of the Commonwealth.
END QUOTE
10 The time for religious excuses are over. Religion is as the Framers of the Constitution made
clear:
Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS.-
"religion is ever a matter between God and the individual; the imposing of religious tests hath been the
15 greatest engine of tyranny in the world."
END QUOTE
Therefore, as long as a person practice religion privately without causing any disturbance to
another person then this can be tolerated, however if the person seeks to do it in a manner that
20 can or will be harmful to anyone else then it no longer can be deemed to be protected by s116 of
the constitution. We have a so called Western society where women are equal to men and we
must not under the guise of any religious excuse tolerate any women to be denied the equality.
Being it to be denied freely to move about as any other woman, to be covered up in public, etc.
25 HANSARD 10-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
Then, again, there is the prerogative right to declare war and peace, an adjunct of which it is that the
Queen herself, or her representative, where Her Majesty is not present, holds that prerogative. No one
would ever dream of saying that the Queen would declare war or peace without the advice of a
30 responsible Minister.
END QUOTE
HANSARD 6-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
35 Mr. DEAKIN: We can make an exception in favour of imperial interests. We have no desire to
interfere with the imperial prerogative in matters of war and peace!
END QUOTE
Obviously, we must without hesitation hold those who were involved in the unconstitutional/
40 unlawful invasion into Iraq/Afghanistan also legally accountable, as I made clear when I on 19
July 2006 successfully appealed both convictions of FAILING TO VOTE;
ADDRESS TO THE COURT County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
QUOTE
45 The Defendant submits, that even so he does not require to state his religion and neither which part of his
religion is relevant for a religious objection as it can be a secular objection, he has religious objections and
one is that THOU SHALL NOT KILL where Mr. John Howard unconstitutionally authorised the
murderous invasions into Afghanistan and Iraq. How on earth could anyone expect me to vote by preference
voting for what I consider a mass murderer and one who committed treachery, treason, sedition and
50 committed crimes against humanity, and by this voting for anyone who supported the war, such as members
of his political party. My right to abstain from voting could not be denied, neither be punished.
Likewise, in regard of the 2001 election where unconstitutionally, against International obligations, such as
the maritime report in regard of the sinking of the Titanic it is unlawful to allow or to send any boat or ship
away that is unseaworthy. Yet, we had the Government using the navy to do so and refugees drowning in the
55 process. We had the Australian Federal Police, a law enforcement agency, being involved in what was
claimed to be conduct to discourage people smuggling, but it was being to prevent refugees to come to the
Commonwealth of Australia, and in the process we had the sinking of SIEV X, with 363 people aboard of
which 146 children, on 19 October 2001.
END QUOTE
60
Page 14
QUOTE
With the 2004 purported Federal election the added issue is also that no one in his right mind can demand or
otherwise force me to vote for what I consider a war criminal, being Mr John Howard, likewise so for any of
his political allies.
5 The position of Prime Minister does not exist in the written Constitution. However, as a constitutionalist
I am well aware that the framers of the Constitution intended there be a Prime Minister, albeit with limited
powers. As they made clear the power to declare War or Peace rest with the Monarch and so by the
Governor-General and this was only to be acted upon by a Declaration of War if it involved going to war.
Hence, the armed invasion into Afghanistan and Iraq was unconstitutional as no DECLARATION OF WAR
10 was ever publicised in the Gazette. As a matter of fact, I understand it was TREACHERY within section
24AA of the Crimes Act (Cth) for the Prime minister and others to authorise a war against friendly nations,
as they were in view they had not actually attacked us and neither had the governor-General issued a
Declaration of War to placed them to be enemies.
END QUOTE
15
Constitutionally, the Prime Minister has no say, as it is the Governor-General who decides
matters to declare war or peace on behalf of the Crown, and the Minister of Defence then is the
responsible Minister who acts within the authority provided. It would therefore be utterly and
totally absurd that where I oppose such kind of mass murder upon innocent people I somehow
20 could nevertheless be forced to vote in a manner as to show a preferences that might in fact end
up having my vote counted for a war mongering person. It would be contrary to the very
POLITICAL FREEDOMS the Framers of the Constitution provided for. Members of Parliament
themselves maintain a right to abstain from voting or not even turn up for voting, and consider
this to be their right, and hardly could this right be any less for ordinary electors.
25
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
30 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE

35 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the
liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of
liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good
government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
40 END QUOTE
While politicians can continue to tell people to go on with their lives as normal, while they
themselves are behind fortified walls and a curtain of security staff, I for one would like to see
that if someone does end up being harmed in any way by acts of terrorism then the person or his
45 grieving family will sue the hell out of the politicians who were involved in the mass murder,
crimes against humanity, war crimes, etc, that eventuated to the subsequent harm now suffered.
50 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)
END QUOTE 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE
QUOTE 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle

Lord Mayor Robert Doyle, 28-1-2017
55 Robert Doyle <Robert.Doyle@melbourne.vic.gov.au>
Robert,

Page 15
further to my 23 January 2017 email to you (And thank yhou to your staff for the
acknowledgement!) I for one have suggested in my 20170127-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H.
Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution that
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Premier Daniel Andrews and yourself share a meeting with
5 me to address what did the Prime Minister and the Premier do since my 15 July 2016 PRESS
RELEASE as to immediately secure the safety of citizens at Bourke Street Mall.
It should not be ignored that for the same those killed could have been hundreds of not thousands
of citizens had what I warned about eventuated.
While copycat terrorism conduct may be regarded as an issue, the fact that for more than 2
10 decades I warned about the dangers in regard of Bourke Street Mall and nothing was ever done
to provide security may underline that it is not an issue specifically to terrorism even so the
conduct in its own form is terrorism upon citizens. As such long before the Iraq invasion and the
subsequent terrorism around the worlds I already then warned specifically about Bourke Street
Mall. It is a lesson that we now have that blatant disregard of warnings result in innocent people
15 having lost their lives and others are victims for life.
Just consider what, if any warning system is in place that when a person like myself notifies
authorities about possible dangers then this is not so to say ignored but goes into a central data
base and all concerned are than notified about it. Perhaps, had this eventuated in regard of my 15
July 2016 PRESS RELEASE you may have had forewarning and possibly taken appropriate
20 action. Again, I made the warnings for more than 2 decades and yet it took the lives of 5 innocent
people (so far) before finally action may be taken in the interim. Why couldnt this have been
done long ago? What I understand from the media reports might be precisely the kind of conduct
I so often wrote about could result in mass casualties. It is to try to understand what possibly
causes people wanting to kill innocent people that is very important.
25 QUOTE ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution
ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution

30 constitution.
http://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-says-bollards-should-be-
in-melbournes-cbd/news-story/ac777444103f2bbfb0c8a1a21f8c9876
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says bollards should be in Melbournes CBD.
35
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/a-vulnerability-we-need-to-address-malcolm-turnbull-
calls-for-more-bollards-in-melbournes-pedestrian-areas-20170126-gtznfw.html
'A vulnerability we need to address'- Malcolm Turnbull calls for more bollards
40 www.theaustralian.com.au/...turnbull.../7e59dd1f19e7ae9e65b15ebd86bf261d
Malcolm Turnbull: duty of every government is to protect citizens
Well, on that basis the question must be asked why did he and other politicians (such as Premier
Daniel Andrews) then blatantly disregard my 20160715 PRESS RELEASE?
45 He might now go around trying to pretend to support bollards to be placed and so Premier Daniel
Andrews but I for one am not a person to have this kind of immoral conduct to be left
unanswered. It is that I contacted Melbournes Lord Mayor Mr Robert Doyle and Japans
Consult-General Hadena about it that now he realises that he better gets involved? Well, I have
not heard his 3AW comments but I doubt he was honest about his own miserable failure to act
50 from onset.
I have indicated to Melbournes Lord Mayor Mr Robert Doyle that I contemplate to provide a
submission to the coroner. It seems to me that Prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and Premier
Daniel Andrews would do better to at my convenience have a meeting (with me) and so also with
Melbournes Lord Mayor Mr Robert Doyle being present to discuss relevant issues.

Page 16
After all I for one prefer to provide a submission to the coroner that will be factually correct and
if Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull (so reported in the media) claims to have been working on
the issue then obviously he better come clear with the facts. If he doesnt then I view he is
willing to walk over the corpses of those killed for his own political survival and perhaps seeks
5 to fabricate some version of events.
Because PM Malcolm Turnbull now makes clear the government has a duty to protect its citizens
I be looking forwards to him and Premier Daniel Andrews to present me with the facts what they
did as a matter of urgency since at least my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE.
Let us be clear about it so far 5 people have died and we cannot ignore this! Just wait till the
10 lawyers representing the victims and their families become aware about my 15 July 2016 PRESS
RELEASE. I doubt Australia will be large enough for Malcolm Turnbull PM and Premier Daniel
Andrews to hide.
15 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
END QUOTE ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution
I have absolutely no doubt that in time the victims lawyers will demand answers as to why
20 Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Premier Daniel Andrews failed to act upon my specific
warnings about Bourke Street Mall lack of appropriate safety measures, and I doubt you desire to
be the next in line for criticism, etc. Just keep in mind that a next time an incident were to occur
the casualty rate could be if not in the thousands then hundreds. To some people collateral
damage is acceptable after all we hear politicians often referring to this to try to excuse their
25 warmongering causing the death of innocent people in foreign countries.
Considering I reside at Viewbank (Banyule City) it seems to me a Melbourne meeting would be
desirable. I prefer communication otherwise to be via email, this, as my mobile is only used for
text messages. As I am a senior citizen I am not restrained by work commitments to attend a
30 meeting, albeit prefers to avoid any early morning meetings due to family circumstances. Due to
the parking problems I am willing to accept alternative transport being offered to and from the
meeting place. So to say you reap what you sow!
My condolences to the victims family and friends.
35 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
(Our name is our motto!)

END QUOTE 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle
40
QUOTE RESPONSE: RE: see attachment 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to
Lord Mayor Robert Doyle
RE: see attachment 20170128-G. H.
Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor
45 Robert Doyle
From Robert Doyle
Sender Karen Browne
To Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Date Today 05:41

Page 17
Dear Mr Schorel-Hlavka ,
Thank you very much for your kind email which I will present to the Lord Mayor for his
information.
5
Kind regards,
Karen Browne | Projects Assistant Lord Mayors Office
10
City of Melbourne | Town Hall - Corner Collins and Swanston Streets, Melbourne | GPO
Box 1603 Melbourne 3001
T: 03 9658 9840 | F: 03 9654 2628
karen.browne@melbourne.vic.gov.au www.melbourne.vic.gov.au
15
We value: Integrity | Courage | Accountability | Respect | Excellence
Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this email.
20 From: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. [mailto:admin@inspector-rikati.com]
Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2017 10:26 PM
To: Robert Doyle
Cc: Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Subject: see attachment 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle
25 see attachment 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle
Politicians and their collateral damage excuses. You reap what you sow!
The documents can be downloaded from (as to verify the original content of what is stated below if you
desire to do so):
https://www.scribd.com/document/337765012/20170128-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Lord-Mayor-
30 Robert-Doyle
Lord Mayor Robert Doyle, 28-1-2017
Robert Doyle <Robert.Doyle@melbourne.vic.gov.au>
Robert,
further to my 23 January 2017 email to you (And thank yhou to your staff for the acknowledgement!) I
35 for one have suggested in my 20170127-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re
Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Premier Daniel
Andrews and yourself share a meeting with me to address what did the Prime Minister and the Premier do
since my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE as to immediately secure the safety of citizens at Bourke Street
Mall.
40 It should not be ignored that for the same those killed could have been hundreds of not thousands of citizens
had what I warned about eventuated.
While copycat terrorism conduct may be regarded as an issue, the fact that for more than 2 decades I warned
about the dangers in regard of Bourke Street Mall and nothing was ever done to provide security may
underline that it is not an issue specifically to terrorism even so the conduct in its own form is terrorism upon
45 citizens. As such long before the Iraq invasion and the subsequent terrorism around the worlds I already then
warned specifically about Bourke Street Mall. It is a lesson that we now have that blatant disregard of
warnings result in innocent people having lost their lives and others are victims for life.

Page 18
Just consider what, if any warning system is in place that when a person like myself notifies authorities about
possible dangers then this is not so to say ignored but goes into a central data base and all concerned are than
notified about it. Perhaps, had this eventuated in regard of my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE you may have
had forewarning and possibly taken appropriate action. Again, I made the warnings for more than 2 decades
5 and yet it took the lives of 5 innocent people (so far) before finally action may be taken in the interim. Why
couldnt this have been done long ago? What I understand from the media reports might be precisely the kind
of conduct I so often wrote about could result in mass casualties. It is to try to understand what possibly
causes people wanting to kill innocent people that is very important.
QUOTE ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution
10 ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.
http://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-says-bollards-should-be-
in-melbournes-cbd/news-story/ac777444103f2bbfb0c8a1a21f8c9876
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says bollards should be in Melbournes CBD.
15 http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/a-vulnerability-we-need-to-address-malcolm-turnbull-
calls-for-more-bollards-in-melbournes-pedestrian-areas-20170126-gtznfw.html
'A vulnerability we need to address'- Malcolm Turnbull calls for more bollards
www.theaustralian.com.au/...turnbull.../7e59dd1f19e7ae9e65b15ebd86bf261d
20 Well, on that basis the question must be asked why did he and other politicians (such as Premier Daniel
Andrews) then blatantly disregard my 20160715 PRESS RELEASE?
He might now go around trying to pretend to support bollards to be placed and so Premier Daniel Andrews
but I for one am not a person to have this kind of immoral conduct to be left unanswered. It is that I contacted
Melbournes Lord Mayor Mr Robert Doyle and Japans Consult-General Hadena about it that now he
25 realises that he better gets involved? Well, I have not heard his 3AW comments but I doubt he was honest
about his own miserable failure to act from onset.
I have indicated to Melbournes Lord Mayor Mr Robert Doyle that I contemplate to provide a submission to
the coroner. It seems to me that Prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and Premier Daniel Andrews would do
better to at my convenience have a meeting (with me) and so also with Melbournes Lord Mayor Mr Robert
30 Doyle being present to discuss relevant issues.
After all I for one prefer to provide a submission to the coroner that will be factually correct and if Prime
Minister Malcolm Turnbull (so reported in the media) claims to have been working on the issue then
obviously he better come clear with the facts. If he doesnt then I view he is willing to walk over the corpses
of those killed for his own political survival and perhaps seeks to fabricate some version of events.
35 Because PM Malcolm Turnbull now makes clear the government has a duty to protect its citizens I be
looking forwards to him and Premier Daniel Andrews to present me with the facts what they did as a matter
of urgency since at least my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE.
Let us be clear about it so far 5 people have died and we cannot ignore this! Just wait till the lawyers
representing the victims and their families become aware about my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE. I doubt
40 Australia will be large enough for Malcolm Turnbull PM and Premier Daniel Andrews to hide.

Page 19
END QUOTE ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution
I have absolutely no doubt that in time the victims lawyers will demand answers as to why Prime Minister
5 Malcolm Turnbull and Premier Daniel Andrews failed to act upon my specific warnings about Bourke Street
Mall lack of appropriate safety measures, and I doubt you desire to be the next in line for criticism, etc. Just
keep in mind that a next time an incident were to occur the casualty rate could be if not in the thousands then
hundreds. To some people collateral damage is acceptable after all we hear politicians often referring to this
to try to excuse their warmongering causing the death of innocent people in foreign countries.
10 Considering I reside at Viewbank (Banyule City) it seems to me a Melbourne meeting would be desirable. I
prefer communication otherwise to be via email, this, as my mobile is only used for text messages. As I am a
senior citizen I am not restrained by work commitments to attend a meeting, albeit prefers to avoid any early
morning meetings due to family circumstances. Due to the parking problems I am willing to accept
alternative transport being offered to and from the meeting place. So to say you reap what you sow!
15 My condolences to the victims family and friends.
--
20 Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
107 Graham Road
Viewbank 3084, Victoria, Australia
25 Author of INSPECTOR-RIKATI books on certain constitutional and other

legal issues.
THE MORAL OF A SOCIETY CAN BE MEASURED BY HOW IT PROVIDES FOR THE

DISABLED
30 This email is intended solely for the named addressee.

If you are not the addressee indicated please delete it immediately.
END QUOTE RESPONSE: RE: see attachment 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka

O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle
35 QUOTE 13-2-2017 RESPONSE Lisa Neville MP Minister for police Minister for Water
Response to your correspondence
Minister.Police@justice.vic.gov.au

Today at 9:31
40 To
inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au

Page 20
Message body
Dear Mr Schorel-Hlavka,
5 Thank you for your email about the Bourke Street tragedy.
I share your concern and anger about what happened on that day. It is only human to ask how did this
happen? And why did this happen? These are questions that have to be answered. That's why the coroner
has been given extra support and assistance to conduct a coronial investigation that examines all matters
10 leading up to the tragedy including the conduct of police. This is the right and proper process to follow - to
get to the truth of the matter and make sure that any change that is needed is done properly. In addition
the Government has also set up an after hours bail and remand court and asked former Supreme Court
Judge and Director of Public Prosecutions, Justice the Honourable Paul Coghlan, to provide urgent advice to
Government about additional changes to Victorias bail system that will best manage risk and maximise
15 community safety.
In terms of broader issues around community safety, we know that there is both pressure on our police, as
well as concern about the harm that violent offenders can cause in our communities. It is a challenge, and
one I have acknowledged from the start.
20
Police are doing an exceptional job but I know from my discussions with police officers and with victims of
crime that they need more help.
That's why the Government has responded with a comprehensive strategy to prevent, detect and disrupt
25 crime. The Community Safety Statement, released in December 2016, outlines the range of new
investments, powers, tools and capability that Victoria Police will be equipped with to stabilise the crime
rate and begin to reduce the level of harm being caused in the community. Central to the Community Safety
Statement is boosting of police numbers right across the state. In total, 3,135 additional frontline police,
including 415 specialist family violence officers, will be rolled out to respond to crime in our communities.
30 The first of the new police will be deployed shortly to respond to local crime issues and the increased
demand for police in growth areas. This is the biggest boost to front-line police in Victorias history, and its
crucial to dealing with the growing demand on police services.
The Community Safety Statement also outlines the changes the government has made to tackle youth
35 crime, violent offenders, high volume crime and recidivism. They include new penalties and sentencing, and
tougher bail conditions. These changes are part of the broader strategy which will stabilise and then turn
around the crime rate in Victoria
You can find more information on the Community Safety Statement at <http://www.vic.gov.au/community-
40 safety-statement-2017>
Similarly there is more detail about the Coghlan review at <https://engage.vic.gov.au/bailreview>. There is
also opportunity for you to provide input directly into the Coghlan review. I encourage you to feed your
thoughts into that review.
45
I appreciate you raising these concerns. These are matters of such importance to all of us.
Yours sincerely
50 Lisa Neville MP
Office of The Hon. Lisa Neville MP

Minister for Police
Minister for Water
55 Level 17, 8 Nicholson Street
East Melbourne, Victoria 3002

Page 21
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
The content of this e-mail and any attachments may be private and confidential, intended
only for use of the individual or entity named. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message you must not read, forward, print, copy, disclose, use or store in any way the
5 information this e-mail or any attachment contains.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete or
destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.
Our organisation respects the privacy of individuals. For a copy of our privacy policy
please go to our website or contact us.
10 END QUOTE 13-2-2017 RESPONSE Lisa Neville MP Minister for police Minister for Water
This is the same Minister to who regards the complaints I made that GWMWater is providing in
the Mallee area untreated water and that this violated the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003, and
GWMWater ignored to provide markings that this is grew water and so unsuspected people,
15 including perhaps a busload of schoolchildren visiting the Mallee could fall ill if not die because
of this. Even so the Victorian Department of Health specifically warns against using for human
consumption untreated water, somehow nothing is done about it.
.
And as I proved also in Court there is an ongoing fire danger by councils but that is left
20 unattended while innocent land holders are pursued even regarding nature strips even so the
Country Fire Authority Act 1958 doesnt allow for nature strips to be included.
.
We have essentially a Government gone missing in action.
25 And well after the event they scramble to get the public attention (after all likely for the next
election whenever that is) pretending to care about the victims, etc, but\ concealing they could
have avoided the carnage if just they had acted appropriately upon my warnings. At least the then
Premier of Victoria Mr Jeff Kennett did when installing metal detectors at court entrances when I
warned him about my understanding that there are persons wanting to commit murder in the
30 court areas.
Turnbull wants bollards following Bourke Street rampage www.abc.net.au/news/201 via @ABCNews
26 mins ago Twitter
David Hurley
35 (@davidhurleyHS)
Bourke St Mall needs safety bollards in wake of deadly rampage, PM Malcolm Turnbull says.
www.heraldsun.com.au/ne
34 mins ago Twitter
ABC News
40 (@abcnews)
.@TurnbullMalcolm calls for more bollards to be installed in #Melbourne to prevent repeat of #BourkeStreet
attack ab.co/2kyRM4T
42 mins ago Twitter
7 News Adelaide
45 (@7NewsAdelaide)
.@Turnbullmalcolm says bollards should be considered for Melbourne CBD to stop rogue drivers hitting
pedestrians.pic.twitter.com/Ca0dQCg
46 mins ago Twitter
Nine News Melbourne
50 (@9NewsMelb)
PM @TurnbullMalcolm calls for bollards in Melbourne CBD's streets: www.9news.com.au/nation #9News

Page 22
1 hour ago Twitter
Geelong Journal
(@geelongjournal)
Build Bourke St mall bollards: PM: PRIME Minister Malcolm Turnbull has said bollards need to be installed
5 inpic.twitter.com/l2Rn0Ty
1 hour ago Twitter
Federal Politics
(@PoliticsFairfax)
'A vulnerability we need to address': Malcolm Turnbull calls for more bollards in Melbourne's pedestrian
10 areas www.theage.com.au/feder
1 hour ago Twitter
Paul Karp
(@Paul_Karp)
Turnbull's new year is going to be spent on company tax, childcare and BOLLARDS if that interview was
15 anything to go on #auspol
3 hours ago Twitter
Bourke Street: Malcolm Turnbull calls for bollards in Melbourne to ...

www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-27/malcolm-turnbull-calls...bollards-in.../8216836
34 mins ago - Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull calls for more bollards to be installed in Melbourne to
20 prevent a repeat of the Bourke Street rampage that killed ...
'A vulnerability we need to address': Malcolm Turnbull calls for more ...
www.smh.com.au Politics News
2 hours ago - Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says Melbourne and other Australian ... Malcolm Turnbull
calls for more bollards in busy pedestrian areas ...
25 Malcolm Turnbull says Melbourne should consider bollards for CBD

thenewdaily.com.au News State Victoria
1 hour ago - Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says bollards should be considered for Melbourne CBD
roads and footpaths to stop rogue drivers hitting ...
PM wants bollards in Melbourne CBD streets - Sky News

30 www.skynews.com.au/news/.../01/.../pm-wants-bollards-in-melbourne-cbd-streets.htm...
28 mins ago - PM Turnbull says bollards should be used for the Melbourne CBD to avoid rouge drivers
hitting pedestrians.
Bourke St rampage: Build Bourke St Mall bollards, Prime Minister ...

www.heraldsun.com.au/...bollards...turnbull.../62c72471eb4fc5dbad600e31aa4fba9d
35 1 hour ago - PRIME Minister Malcolm Turnbull has said bollards need to be installed in Melbourne CBD to
stop terrorists carrying out a repeat of the Bourke ...
Turnbull tells states to beef up security | SBS News

www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/01/27/turnbull-tells-states-beef-security
1 hour ago - Malcolm Turnbull wants to see more bollards along roads and footpaths across the country in
40 the wake of the Bourke Street attack.

www.theaustralian.com.au/...turnbull.../7e59dd1f19e7ae9e65b15ebd86bf261d
1 hour ago - Mr Turnbull said Melbourne needed more bollards in place to protect places like Bourke Street
Mall. It is a significant issue where you have a ...
45 PM calls for bollards in Melb CBD streets - Star 106.3 Townsville

www.star1063.com.au/news/national.../64216-pm-calls-for-bollards-in-melb-cbd-stre...

Page 23
Following the deadly Bourke Street attack where five people died after a driver mounted footpaths, Malcolm
Turnbull said security should be toughened in the ...
http://www.star1063.com.au/news/national-news/64216-pm-calls-for-bollards-in-melb-cbd-streets
5 PM calls for bollards in Melb CBD streets
Source: http://www.star1063.com.au/news/national-news/64216-pm-calls-for-bollards-in-melb-cbd-streets
National News
Star 106.3 Townsville

10
https://gumshoenews.com/2017/01/22/who-is-the-blue-man-waving-instructions-to-gargasoulas-before-the-
killing-spree/comment-page-1/#comment-27476
Who Is The Blue Man Waving Instructions To Gargasoulas Before The Killing Spree?
15 January 22, 2017 by Dalia Mae
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/comment-bourke-street-a-few-minutes-of-vile-madness/ar-
AAm3I1G?li=AAgfIYZ
Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton said: "We know a fair bit about his background," adding the man had a
20 history of family violence.
http://www.pm.gov.au/media/2017-01-22/doorstop-premier-victoria-hon-daniel-andrews-mp-lord-mayor-
melbourne-robert-doyle
Doorstop with the Premier of Victoria, the Hon Daniel Andrews MP, the Lord Mayor of Melbourne, Robert
Doyle and Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police, Graham Ashton AM
25
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/melbourne-night-court-to-start-in-wake-of-
bourke-st-attack/news-story/95882fd1937b4457e8789c0d6a6ba6ad
Melbourne night court to start in wake of Bourke St attack
30 In my view while night courts might be appropriate it would be wrong to denigrate bail justices
for the considerable amount of work they have provided to the community merely because they
could so to say be an easy target, merely because it may suit politicians.
I may also include the following email correspondences that may make clear we need less
35 obsessive politicians governing other countries such as the USA and they need to be more
attentive to matters within the Commonwealth of Australia. After all to resolve the ever growing
rumble of a volcano (to express it that way) of dissolution and being aggrieved we need to
address the failures of the various systems.
.
40 Whenever a child is found to have died under the care and control of the Department of Human
Services the excuse and yes a blatant excuse is that not sufficient workers are employed and they
are overworked. Reality is that the Children Court should make sure that each child (that is if
placed in care) must have assigned to it a specific worker and if this worker cannot continue then
this worker must seek the court to amend any orders to apply to a different worker. As such the
45 children Court shouldnt accept the nonsense no one is available and still place a child under
orders of DHS. As I did in about 1987 successfully complaining to the Ombudsman about the
inappropriate conditions that DHS itself had in caring for small children. Children who grow up
disregarded by DHS but so to say are generally merely a form of employment to the workers
then may likely learn to live a way of crime to survive. We need to pursue that politicians act
50 honourably and not abuse and misuse the system for their own personal financial gains, this as
children who hear about this likely grow up with a disrespect for law and order.
Page 24
QUOTE email received 13-2-2017
Africans rampage at Melbourne's northwest festival. Police
stand back.
People
5 Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>

Today at 14:40 (13-2-2017)
To
Jim
10 Photos
image001.png
Download All
Message body
15 Get use to it everyone, the residents of Dandenong suffered this onslaught of crime for
8 years before the Moomba weekend last year when they started to branch out. The
Police and council in the end told the residents to run for your lives if you see a group
of Sudanese coming. Majority of residents have moved out.
This is the Government's way of moving the population out of Melbourne, if you get
20 terrorised enough you will up and sell your property, which will make way for Calcutta
style unit blocks ready for more immigration. And the ABC does another one of its
blatant cover-ups by running their usual 'protection racket' for these violent refugees.
Not a word about it on their airwaves and definitely no mention of their race.
Christine
25 The Police these days invent good reasons for not confronting, much less arresting,
lawbreakers in certain categories. The Police fear Muslim mobs; they fear Aboriginal
mobs and black African mobs. They fear the far-left street thugs bent on preventing
Conservatives speaking. The Police will say they did not intervene when Conservatives
were being assaulted because they feared "causing an escalation of violence", or they
30 will say they were too few to be effective. OR, as with Police pursuits, they backed off
"for fear of a member of the public being harmed". See the contradiction? Car chase -
call it off because the speeding offender might kill a pedestrian or other driver. Leftist
thugs assaulting Conservatives ? - no intervention in order to prevent "an escalation".
Spencer
35 Its a about three weeks short of a year since the Moomba riot which saw the Apex
gang stacked with Sudanese wreak havoc. That was on the Saturday night but it was
not until the Monday that Dan Andrews finally came to make a statement huffing and
puffing saying that these people were going to "face the full force of the law"
It sounded unconvincing then and we know now it to be utter bullshit, as we have long
40 lost count of the home invasions, car hijackings, assaults, armed robberies, muggings,
Page 25
riots you name it this lot and their cohorts have been involved with since. And its
getting worse by the day and Andrews refuses to admit there is a crime problem
among some Sudanese youth.
Until we get rid of this stupid la di da, 'No Harm' and 'Keep the Peace' policing policy
5 and replace it with a 'Uphold the Law, Zero Tolerance' law enforcement policy,
Victoria's crime plague not just among African youths but right across the board will
only get worse
Frank of Malvern
10 Africans rampage at festival. Police stand back

Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
February 12, 2017 7:56pm
This Sudanese crime problem - largely imported by the Howard Government - is grave
and now undeniable.
15 The latest example of many:
A STAMPEDE of youths has ruined a family festival in Melbournes northwest last night,
sending one teenager to hospital.
Locals were shocked when hundreds of youths as young as 10 stampeded throughout

Summersault Festival in Caroline Springs last night when the fireworks started around
20 10pm.
Carrie was caught up in the stampede, had her phone and wallet stolen and was
shoved in the stomach.
There would have been at least 100 Sudanese who just ran at us like a giant wave; it
was a planned attack, she said.
25 Remember when we had an Immigration Minister - and, no, not Amanda Vanstone,
the one who left the door wide open - who had the guts to warn us this "compassion"
of ours meant we were importing big trouble?
It was in 2007 that [Kevin] Andrews, immigration minister in the Howard government,
said he was cutting back on refugees from Sudan and Somalia.
30 Some groups dont seem to be settling and adjusting into the Australian way of life as
quickly as we would hope, he said.
The problem was a clash of cultures and the crime rate among the Sudanese was too
high.
All true and Andrews was punished for it, even though he stressed that many
35 Sudanese were indeed settling in well.
The ethnic lobby predictably denounced him as a racist, as did Labor politicians.
It has been a long time since I have heard such a pure form of racism out of the
mouth of any Australian politician, sneered Queensland premier Anna Bligh.
Page 26
And Victoria's then chief commissioner of police falsely claimed Andrews was wrong:
But worst was the reaction of Victoria Police, led by Labor-appointed Christine Nixon.
Nixon claimed Andrews was wrong about Sudanese crime rates: Theyre not, in a
sense, represented more than the proportion of them in the population.
5 A police multicultural liaison officer agreed: Theres an under-representation of the

Sudanese in crime stats.
Those police claims were false. Figures let slip by Nixon the following year revealed
crime rates for Sudanese youth at least four times the state average.
And, last night at the e had enother example of the kind of policing that seems only
10 too common since Nixon's appointment. Although, true, confronting 100 rioters would
have been tough for just a handful of police - if that's all they had:
The police advised they could literally see everything unfolding, but didnt do anything
as they thought it could have been sort of decoy as they had experienced before and
clearly they didnt have the numbers."
15 Add that to yesterday's example:
More than 100 anti-racism protesters have confronted members of the far-right, anti-
Islam Q Society preparing to attend a fundraiser to be headlined by Senator Cory
Bernardi and Queensland MP George Christensen on Friday night..
Some protesters rocked the bus, while others jostled Q Society supporters as they
20 tried to board.
Police were at the scene, but stayed at a distance. That appeared to be a tactical
move, so as not to further ignite the protest.
Last month, when a man rammed his car into pedestrians in Bourke St Mall, killing six
of them:
25 We want to know why the driver wasnt tackled when his stolen Commodore halted at
South Wharf, with police cars around it.
We want to know why he wasnt arrested or the car disabled when he stopped at
a derelict property with the girlfriend who says he abducted her.
We want to know why it took police cars crucial minutes to reach the intersection
30 outside Flinders St station, where the man spent time doing slow circles, hanging out
the window as he shouted threats, before slowly driving up Swanston St.
We want to know why it is that the only apparent effort made to stop him at Flinders
St before he headed towards Bourke St was made by a brave motorist with a
baseball bat.
35 We want to know why uniformed police at the intersection were not as bold as the
baseballer, and why they did not rush the driver with batons, capsicum spray and
tasers, even if it was too risky to use handguns.

Page 27
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/africans-rampage-at-festival-police-
stand-back/news-story/4dfcd69db5a4a9f7d7570453e9ca3b7d
END QUOTE email received 13-2-2017
5 QUOTE email communication 12-2-2017 Re: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE

QUESTION- REALLY?
Re: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE QUESTION- REALLY?
People
Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>

10
Today at 8:22 (12-2-2017)
To
Jim
CC
15 Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Message body
Jim,
while I can understand the sentiments you expressed reality is different to dome degree.
20 .
We had John Howard authorising the armed unconstitutional invasion into Iraq and despite
my frequent calls for a Royal commission it never happens. That was pure dictatorship and
so supported by other parliamentarians. This, whereas with President Trump he actually (at
least so far) is acting within the confines of the US constitution. Yet we have morons like
25 Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop and not to forget Bill Shorten who are criticising President
Trump for no more but keeping his word he gave during the election and within the
confines of his constitutional powers.
.
Merely because Turnbull, Bishop, Shorten and others don't like what candidate/President-
30 elect/President Trump executive decisions are about, even so within the framework of the
US constitution they have been denigrating, ridiculing, etc, him. Yet, as I understand it
Julie Bishop was part of the Cabinet to decide to invade Iraq regardless of the innocent
lives lost in the process and bombing Iraq back into the Stone Age. they talk about ISIS
being evil but they themselves did to some degree worse in Iraq.!
35
What I since 1982 learned with my special lifeline MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS
PREVAIL is to what motivate a person to not just contemplate to commit suicide but
even murder/mass murder.
40 A major problem we have is that too often judges are operating as dictators as one judge
made clear (Gaynor) the constitution doesn't apply to her. That just shows the extend of
this deplorable conduct. And the same with Carmody who made clear he was not going to
deal with legal point of issues as he decides what he deems suitable!
The same with Mallaly.
45
When I get judge after judge who simply disregard what is constitutionally and otherwise
legally appropriate then we do have a problem.
Page 28
Most people may lack the knowledge to detect this and well while holding to have been
railroaded/shafted by the judiciary they cannot express this in a way people would
understand it, and so some then decide they desire to make a considerable statement when
committing suicide by murdering as many innocent people as they can as to ensure that the
5 People will bed well aware why they killed.
If a person just commit suicide then generally that person is just part of a statistic. If the
person however commits mass murder than people will talk about it and then perhaps a
coroner may investigate why.
Look at how I have been fighting GWMWater about the untreated water and politicians
10 simply fail to act against it. Even Premier Daniel Andrews even so he was the Minister of
Health outlining in the Parliament why the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 was to be
implemented. But one day you might some parent losing a child due to drinking
unintended untreated water and then such parent may just desire to live no longer and well
want to make a big statement by killing as many people as possible.. Politicians may at
15 times actually welcome this kind of mass murder albeit pretend otherwise, so they can use
this as an excuse to legislate. Martin Bryant to me is a clear example that I view was
committed by special trained shooters and I cannot accept that Martin Bryant could have
been a lone shooter.
That is also why I warned the then Premier of Victoria Jeff Kennett about installing metal
20 detectors at the court entrances, this because I was given the understanding by some people
wanting to go out killing judges.
To the credit of Premier Jeff Kennett he then commenced to have metal detectors installed.
I warned politicians for more than 2 decades specifically about Bourke Street Mall being
often the raised in conversations with others where I gained the understanding that certain
25 persons wanted to use gas/petrol tankers to inflict mass casualties when committing
suicide.
Because of my honest writings about the failure of the system it are those kind of people
contacting me for assistance and this enables me to avoid such mass murders by them.
No use to pretend it is all hankedory and nice because it isn't.
30 it is terrible that so far at least 6people got killed and numerous others injured in the
Bourke Street carnage, but we must try to work behind it. why did the driver end up
deciding to pursue such carnage. One doesn't have to agree with his motives but one must
learn the mindset of such person.
I found that people wanting to go on a murder spree do so often to make a clear statement
35 and are not at all considering they are inflicting harm upon others that they themselves
cannot cope with. To them often, at least to my understanding, the more people can get
killed the better the attention of it.
One also have to ask why did the police not intercept this person in the off limit Swanston
Street. Indeed why did the police officer (traffic cop?) at the intersection of Swanston and
40 Flinders Street (as seen in video clips) not bother at all to attend to this driver when
making donuts?
Let is be clear about it, bollards/buffers can be placed without being very obvious. the
must however be able to stop say a 40 ton truck.
45 The money purse in Bourke Street Mall could easily become a hidden buffer/bollard if
underneath it is strengthened, and no one would be the wiser. Likewise, small buildings
like a kiosk may hide buffers/bollards. As such visually it may not appear there are
bollards/buffers as they can be made to blend into the environment.
As I indicated in my 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE using buffers/bollard that will drop
50 into the ground by remote control by tram drivers to pass over them would also be to
prevent tram tracs being used for a murderous event.

Page 29
Likewise, if the same had been fitted in Swanston Street the carnage could possibly have
been avoided.
My writings are about how rotten to the core the judicial system is and exposing this and
5 still at times being able to succeed to defeat the heavily taxpayers funded opponents to may
prove that at times you can succeed, albeit being an extra ordinary difficult battle. I have
often had feed back from people that because of my writings they decided not to give up
and actually succeeded in court against their expectations.
This time the coroner may want to dish it out to whomever for their
10 incompetence/ignorance and failure to act or just cover up until the next mass murder event
eventuates.
Despite the Legal Service Commission trying to stop me doing my UNPAID work they
found in the end I was on 4 occasions representing a barrister with the Legal Service
15 Commission being the opponent. That was the worst kind of scenario they wanted.
Lawyers are trained in a certain manner and the constitution was specifically written for the
unlettered person, the ordinary person, to be in PLAIN ENGLIS, and as such legislation
and the courts should deal with matters to the understanding of the common person and
not trying to be fanciful to use explanations to circumvent peoples rights.
20
As I proved as a CONSTITUTIONALIST the Legal Service Commission had absolutely
no powers to prevent me doing what I did! As a Professional Advocate I was able to
represent/assist lawyers and law firms.
Lawyers read the constitution as lawyers and not as ordinary citizens and for this
25 misconceive/misinterpret what the constitution actually stands for.
When I was falsely accused about sexual issues I (against the warnings of my wife)
decided to publish a book about it and set the record straight. within 2 weeks of providing a
copy of the book to the Chief Commissioner of Police I was formally notified I was no
30 longer a suspect. In this book I did set out what was so basically wrong with the entire
investigation and innocent people could be subjected to an investigation as result. But most
people who are being accused may lack the ability to expose being wrongly accused!
And that brings me back to this driver who killed so many people in Bourke Street carnage.
35 What motivated this person to deliberately mowe down so many people?
No use to talk to psychiatrist/psychologist because their mind set are as the lawyers versus
the common man.
From the various bits of reporting it appears this man was in a trance that ultimately led to
his killing spree. it is the devastating conduct that I view more than likely could have been
40 prevented by intervening action. After all over the decades I was able to avoid this time and
time again by getting people to trust me and then to lead them to a different path to seek to
resolve their grievances.
Then so called False Flag operations are not necessarily all commenced by Government
45 planning and execution but can be to simply let a person raving about to carry on so it can
be used as an excuse for more draconic legislation to empower those in power rather then
to protect the innocent.
I had at times a person coming up to me and give me the understanding that they
50 approached me because they saw how I stood up for my constitutional and other legal
rights and succeeded where others failed and was clear about the misuse and abuse of legal
powers, even by judicial officers, and then sought my assistance to try to have them to
succeed also. I did this at my own cost without seeking any payments! And that is the

Page 30
difference that is important, because I didn't do it as part of a paid employment but because
of my personal senses to assist people in the community to the best of my ability. My more
than 1,000 year family crest of the GUARDIAN ANGEL is much reflecting what I am on
about.
5
What we need is a coroner who is willing to put the blemae to those who should be blamed
and not so to say cover up and by this may incite others to commit far worse atrocities.
I do not know about any extend of citizen having fallen ill or even died because of the
10 untreated water in the Mallee, but eventually no doubt it will be become known, likely
after some innocent children may have died, and then the politicians will likely excuse
themselves and not face charges of manslaughter at the very least, this even so they acted
by ignoring my repeated warnings. After all with the Bourke Street carnage you got Prime
Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Premier Daniel Andrews so to say milking it for whatever
15 they can to promote themselves as to that they care while in reality they ongoing blatantly
ignored my specific warnings that Bourke Street Mall was being targeted while Prime
Minister Malcolm Turnbull making sure that there was a 2.6 metres security fence put
around Canberra Parliament House and also increase of further security there. As such
leave the public as a soft target.
20
Consider that if instead using a ordinary car the person had used a gas/petrol tanker than it
could have wiped out much of Bourke Street Mall as well as possible thousands of deaths
having been inflicted if that has been blown up.
25 Like it or not, what President Donald J Trump stands for but at least he contrary to most
politicians, is determined to keep his promises he made during the election. and that makes
him stand apart, as we generally have lying thieving politicians and well our youth see that
as an example. Little wonder we have a exploding crime wave.
.
30 Let me be clear that there are honest hard working judges, but regretfully they are far and
in between. We need to get back to basics to what our constitution, the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), stands for.
By the High Court of Australia 1999 (drug case) ruling any accused facing serious criminal
35 charges is entitled to legal aid funding where not in a financial position to afford legal
representation. that being so I view that where the accused is granted Legal Aid then all
and any victim should be likewise.
More can be stated but for now this is plenty, albeit nothing must be perceived nor is
40 intended to excuse the driver of his murderous carnage!
Gerrit
45
Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN
50 Ph (International) 61394577209
.
The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE, unless specifically
55 otherwise stated.

Page 31
If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need to do is to consider the
content appropriately!
A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING CONCERNED
5 TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
From: Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>

To: 'Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.' <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>
Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017, 22:58
10 Subject: RE: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE QUESTION- REALLY?
Gerrit,
Its typically bad and irrational judgments like the one mentioned in the article and the personal experiences
15 of others like you and I in the courts, that caused me to lose faith and trust in the judicature years ago.
In my opinion the overall intelligence, training and quality of judicial officers has declined since the mid
1980s, and I certainly would not entrust my life nor any dispute, complaint or claim to the judiciary if I can
avoid it. Professional judges are not the only people capable of resolving issues and problems, although they
20 are arguably still necessary for dealing with criminal offences.
In principle I disagree with any single individual in any form of government holding absolute authority or
power to make any decision that affects their nations people and national interests. The adage, Power
corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely holds true especially in political matters. How many
25 corrupt, bad and seriously questionable executive orders have been issued by moronic presidents like Bush,
Clinton, Obama and the jury is still out on Trump.
What is the point of having a parliament, congress or democracy if it can be circumvented or overridden by a
single person exercising absolute, unquestionable power or jurisdiction over certain subjects and issues?
30
Presidential Executive power is a form of absolute dictatorship that disregards the practical checks and
safeguards of a group decision made by a Congress debating and voting on every specific subject, issue and
bill. That is not the type of Republican form of government I want to see eventuating in Australia, especially
with the proven history of moronic and incompetent Prime Ministers the people have endured for
35 generations.
Jim
From: Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. [mailto:inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au]

40 Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 8:35 PM
To: Jim
Cc: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Subject: Re: SUBMISSION: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE QUESTION-
REALLY?
45
Jim,
the following from a Supreme Court judge underlines what I did set out!
'So Profoundly Wrong': Judge Nap Slams Court's Ruling on Immigration Order
50
QUOTE
On "Special Report" tonight, Judge Andrew Napolitano said this was "precisely the wrong thing for the court
to do."
Read Full Article
55
He explained that the Constitution assigns the decision-making for foreign policy exclusively to the president,
with even Congress taking a supporting role.
"The decision to ban is not reviewable," Judge Napolitano said. "This is an intellectually dishonest piece of
60 work that the 9th Circuit has produced tonight, because it essentially consists of substituting the judgment of
three judges for the president of the United States, when the Constitution unambiguously gives this area of
jurisdiction - foreign policy - exclusively to the president."
"That's why this is so profoundly wrong."

Page 32
END QUOTE
'So Profoundly Wrong': Judge Nap Slams Court's Ruling on Immigr...
By Fox News Insider
On "Special Report" tonight, Judge Andrew Napolitano reacted to an appeals court upholding a temporary...
5

10 (OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
Ph (International) 61394577209
.
15
otherwise stated.
20 content appropriately!
TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
25 From: Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>

To: Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>
Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017, 15:45
Subject: SUBMISSION: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE QUESTION-
REALLY?
30
From: Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. [mailto:inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 10:02 PM
To: conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu
Cc: Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
35 Subject: SUBMISSION: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE QUESTION-
REALLY?
SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE QUESTION- REALLY?
40 Because of the extensive debate (see also Why Trumps executive order on sanctuary cities is
unconstitutional https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/26/constitutional-
problems-with-trumps-executive-order-on-sanctuary-cities/?utm_term=.a18221817afe )about President
Trump executive orders as to perhaps deny certain funding to a State refusing to disclose and/or otherwise to
cooperate with the Administration regarding the identities and the whereabouts of aliens (undocumented
45 persons, etc) I provide the following set out:
The Congress has powers (Article 1)

Section. 8.
QUOTE
50 To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and
all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or
Officer thereof.
END QUOTE
55 QUOTE Article. I. Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and
provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and
Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
END QUOTE Article. I. Section 8
60
In my view therefore prohibits the Congress to grant monies to any State not associated with the functions of
the Union. Actually, the same was rejected when the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Bill was
presented for referendums and then upon the Premiers conference S96 was inserted to allow the
Commonwealth of Australia to make grants upon conditions it deemed it and proper.
Page 33
QUOTE Article 1 Section. 9.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a
regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from
5 time to time.
This clearly limits the granting of monies by the congress for lawful purposes within its own scope of
legislative powers!
END QUOTE Article 1 Section. 9.
10 QUOTE Article 1 Section. 9.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit,
shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or
duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases or Rebellion or
15 Invasion the public Safety may require it.
END QUOTE Section. 9.
Article 1 Section 9 undisputedly places the powers regarding aliens after 1808 in the hands of the Union.
20 QUOTE Article 1 Section. 10.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin
Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass
any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of
Nobility.
25 END QUOTE Article 1 Section. 10.
As such any so called sanctuary states would in fact undermine the powers of the Union if failing to
cooperate with the Government of the Day to reveal details of any alien (undocumented persons or otherwise)
30 QUOTE Article. II. Section. 1.

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office
during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected,
as follows:
END QUOTE Article. II. Section. 1.
35
It is clear that within the ambit of the Congress provided legislative powers the President can act with his
government as he desires.
QUOTE Article II Section. 2.

40 The President shall be Commander in Chief of
the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,
END QUOTE Article II Section. 2.
QUOTE Article 1 Section. 8.

45 To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel
Invasions;
END QUOTE Article 1 Section. 8.
As such the President can utilize Militia to execute governmental requirements where the States refuse to do
50 so, within the proper exercise of Presidential powers.
The following of Artuicle II Section 3 clearly places also upon the President he shall take care that the
Laws be faithfully executed, in my view the word law must include any valid presidential executive order
within the scope of legislative provisions provided for by the congress.
55
QUOTE Article II Section. 3.
he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission
all the Officers of the United States.
END QUOTE Article II Section. 3.
60
The word citizen in Articled IV Section 2 must be read to be lawful citizen who by birth or by naturalization
(Amendment XIV) were provided with citizenship, and aliens cannot be regarded as citizens where they are
not permitted by the Government of the Day to be and/or remain to be in the USA, irrespective if they were
permitted to be so by a previous Government/President.
Page 34
For example the deal made by President Obama to allow settlement of refugees Australia effuse to accept
cannot bind President Trump. President is entitled to govern as he deems fit and proper within his powers
provided for within the US constitution and legislative powers granted by the Congress.
5
The moment a President can dictate a subsequent President what he can or cannot do would nullify any
election for a new President, this as a President could engage in agreements well aware that the President-
elect would not agree with this. In my view, the moment an election is held and a for a President then
referred to as President elect then in real terms the sitting president must act as a care-taking president in that
10 he must not engage in any agreements that he reasonably knows will conflict with his President-elect
intentions. As such, I view the President should consult and involve the President-elect in any matters
regarding which is to take place (wholly or partly) after the President-elect has taken office.
Where the government of the Day was well aware of the way candidate Donald Trump was expressing
15 himself during the election campaigns then it pushing ahead with an agreement with the Obama
Administration in disregard to the President-Elect Mr Donald J Trump must be deemed to have been a
deliberate disgraceful conduct to undermine the Trump presidency.
In my view President Trump therefore is entitled to disregard the entire agreement made knowingly against
20 his intentions.
The same with any State that seek to undermine President Trumps Administration to secure the Union for
legitimate citizens then President Trump in my view is permitted to use all lawful available means to seek
compliance by the states to Presidential executive orders.
25
As I understand it both in the USA and in Australia people are forced to have their children immunized or
faced denial of certain services. Including in Australia certain tax rebates, etc.
As such the Commonwealth (Union and/or Australia) proved to use means to force people to comply, this
30 even so the issue of immunization is not at all a federal issue.
I nearly lost my firstborn child due to immunization but uninformed at the time what the cause was I had my
other children immunized. I am not against immunization but hold the view that parents should be able to
make an informed decision and not be forced to do so by backdoor tactics to deny them certain entitled
35 funding.
As such the same ought to be considered with the states. I doubt however that lawyers considered it in this
manner.
40 While the Congress decides the laws that are to be enacted ultimately Congress is not going about governing
the Union but leaves it up to the President and his Administration to do so.
The congress being limited to grant any monies other than for federal purposes within the charter of the US
constitution and its Amendments then the President facing obstructive States must then seek to invoke lawful
45 means which will cause the States to honor (honour) the federal compact.
I understand that in Collector v. Day the courts held that federal police powers could be exercised to enforce
federal laws. (In Australia however the Framers of the Constitution held that federal laws should be enforced
through State local police, however this is generally ignored by the Commonwealth and federal police invade
50 homes, etc.
QUOTE Article. IV. Section. 2.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be
55 found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be
delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
END QUOTE Article. IV. Section. 2.
The District of Columbia is in a sense a quasi state when it comes to Article IV Section 2, and as such the
60 President is entitled to have any unlawful person to be extradited to him and/or held in detention by the
relevant state awaiting his further directions.

Page 35
Article IV Section 4 further can be called upon regarding any (unarmed) invasion by aliens being not lawful
citizens. It is only regarding domestic violence (being of the kind of civil war) that the President and his
Administration requires a request.
5 QUOTE Article IV Section. 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every
State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and
shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application
of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature
10 cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
END QUOTE Article IV Section. 4.
Amendment XVIII provides in part 2 concurrent powers for the Union and the states. In Australia s51 does
not specifically state concurrent powers but they exist only until the Commonwealth commences to legislate!
15 This however is ignored by the states. The Commonwealth fails to understand the severity of this.
What I therefore conclude is the question if any grant of monies to a state (for Federal Purposes) is left within
the Day to Day governance of the Government of the Day, being the Trump Administration and so if the
President then by executive order can prevent any further payments to any State which harbors against his
20 directions any person who should be or might be deported!
It cannot in my view be a constitutional issue if the President decides that future payments are to be made if a
particular States complies with federal directives that are within the powers of the Government of the Day.
25 It is clear that when it comes to aliens (undocumented persons, etc) then the Trump Administration has the
sole powers to enforce laws. If any grants to a State regarding federal issues are made subject to the State
cooperating with the legitimate power exercise of the Union then I view the courts may hold that this is a
legitimate federal exercise. I read some statements where lawyers argued that President Trump cannot apply
conditions as to the grants of monies to a State as this would violate Article X and would be to take over the
30 powers of Congress. In my view this would be an ill-conceived argument, where the congress merely set
rules within which the Administration is to operate and it may have left open for the Administration to apply
its own rules and guidelines.
While the constitution (as In Australia) demands that taxation shall be uniform, the Section 101 Inter-State
35 Commission in the Australian constitution however is not bound by this as to uniformly provide funding but
can do so considering expert reports what is in the interest of each state, etc.
If therefore the Congress provided this liberty to the Government of the Day then it may very well exercise its
powers to seek compliance by obstructive States rather than to use federal enforcement agencies such as
federal police to force compliance.
40
Considering Ex Parte Young - 209 U.S. 123 (1908) the better option might be for President Trump to
institute proceedings against the relevant State Attorney-Generals to comply with the requirement to reveal
details and provide the persons who are aliens in their states. And where a State fails to do so then the
relevant Attorney-General is placed before the courts to answer upon what lawful excuse the State fails to
45 comply and if not accepted the court then issue a directive against the Attorney-General to comply within a
certain period and failing to do so may result in his/her imprisonment for CONTEMPT OF COURT.

50
55 Ph (International) 61394577209
60 otherwise stated.
content appropriately!

Page 36
TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
END QUOTE email communication 12-2-2017 Re: SUBMISSION- CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY IS THE
QUESTION- REALLY?
5
Nothing in the above must be perceived nor is intended to somehow seek to justify the killing
and harming caused upon the victims in the Bourke Street carnage, but should be taken to heart
that we must not continue on the road of carnage because our politicians talk a lot but are missing
in action when it comes to provide the goods.
10 We have far too many people dying, including suicides that generally doesnt even make the
news and drastic action is needed.
I for one find the Ombudsman in general an utter useless body. For example where it comes to a
complaint the Ombudsman seems to be as if in the pocket of those against one file a complaint.
That is why I have for long recommended the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN (Dont forget
15 the hyphens!) to be used in both State and Federal level. Where a person can lodge a complaint
and any complaint based upon constitutional issues can then be pursued by this OFFICE-OF-
THE-GUARDIAN (Dont forget the hyphens!) irrespective if the complainant were to do so
himself/herself also.
Because no matter of any serious wrongdoings a politician/official usually can resort using
20 taxpayers monies at all cost whereas the complainant usually has no such financial resources it
means that too often people then get nowhere, are utterly frustrated and well then may commit
atrocities that could have been avoided had just a proper system been in place to cater for
genuine grievances.
I proved time and time again over the decades that to be there to listen to those aggrieved can
25 make the difference between life and dead. I for one therefore cannot accept that a real caring
government cannot accomplish the same and in the process may prevent future victims to
eventuate.
As I understand it for some decades there have been aggrieved persons looking around how to
demolish buildings using bombs, etc, and this well before ISIS existed, and as such nothing to do
30 with any religious fanatics. Some may turn to the current wave of religious fanatics because to
them it might strengthened their resolve to pursue to make clear to the community their act of
mass murder was an act of desperation because of no one willing to listen.
As I showed in the above email communication we criticise people such as President Donald J
Trump because the bleeding hearts brigade want it their way no matter what the constitution and
35 laws provided for. And in Australia having Senator Cory Benardi after ongoing warnings going
his own way he ends you being vilified as I understand it even by the Prime Minister. And well
this underlines criminals can have so to say a free run because politicians are only interested in
their own political fortunes even if this means an increase of crime rates. Those entitled to claim
to have freedom of speech are the real racist, using threats and even using violence against peace
40 loving citizens, and those who seek to have the rule of law applied are cast to be the racist..
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
(Our name is our motto!)


20170213-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20170213-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

Coroner Sara Hinchey J 13-2-2017

Some background and further details, etc.

Page 2 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI on the battle SCHOREL-HLAVKA v BLACKSHIRTS

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the

15 As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the

Page 7 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

15 This was repeated in:

QUOTE 21-12-2016 press release

40 The documents can be downloaded from:

----- Original Message -----

NationStates | The Queendom of El Afar

QUOTE EMAIL 16-7-2016

15 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Re THE FAILURE IN

----- Original Message -----

50 Let us pursue a better national security before it is too late!

Constitutionalist & Consultant

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Page 10 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING

----- Forwarded Message -----

see attachment 20160715-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE

25 The documents can be downloaded from:

55 QUOTE 15 July 2016 PRESS RELEASE

Page 11 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the

Page 12 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

HANSARD 6-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle

Page 14 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the

Page 15 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)

Page 16 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Karen Browne | Projects Assistant Lord Mayors Office

25 see attachment 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle

Lord Mayor Robert Doyle, 28-1-2017

Robert Doyle <Robert.Doyle@melbourne.vic.gov.au>

Page 17 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

10 ISSUE: 20170127 - Re Malcolm Turnbull PM-bollards, etc & the constitution

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says bollards should be in Melbournes CBD.

Malcolm Turnbull: duty of every government is to protect citizens

Page 18 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)

15 My condolences to the victims family and friends.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)

25 Author of INSPECTOR-RIKATI books on certain constitutional and other

THE MORAL OF A SOCIETY CAN BE MEASURED BY HOW IT PROVIDES FOR THE

30 This email is intended solely for the named addressee.

END QUOTE RESPONSE: RE: see attachment 20170128-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka

Page 19 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Office of The Hon. Lisa Neville MP

Page 20 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Page 21 13-2-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Bourke Street: Malcolm Turnbull calls for bollards in Melbourne to ...

25 Malcolm Turnbull says Melbourne should consider bollards for CBD

PM wants bollards in Melbourne CBD streets - Sky News

Bourke St rampage: Build Bourke St Mall bollards, Prime Minister ...