Professional Documents
Culture Documents
hydro compatibility
Introduction
I am sure Dr. Anura Wijepala, Chairman of CEB will vouch for the
accuracy of my interpretation of this graph. Did all those
politicians, advisers, technocrats, consultants who make
pronouncements on various platforms about what percentage of
Sri Lankas energy should be derived from Renewable Energy
even care about what percentage of pages in the Long Term
Generation Plan of CEB was devoted to their pet subject
Renewable Energy or about the accuracy of the figures provided
in the report?
Counting the number of the pages is the simplest thing one could
do and the more technically savvy ones could check the accuracy
and if you havent even done that, your high level statements are
worth nothing for the simple folk of this country and is only an
unbearable cost for the country, leading to the droughts we face
today and will be facing in the future.
Then there was this news item in the Lanka Pages that the State
Minister had mentioned that we are heading for some power cuts
and hydro reserves are much less this year. This was followed by
a statement from the Minister of Disaster Management indicating
how the drought has influenced agricultural production, need to
import rice (food security), drought, unavailability of water
(environment security) loss of hydropower (energy security) and
all this contributing to an economic downturn. And I was
thoroughly confused.
Sri Lanka can neither use anymore coal power plants nor anymore
solar parks and the best option for Sri Lanka will be to use
Highway Solarisation as much as possible. Its advantages are
easily visible in the above given table. In fact I wrote to the
President in March, 2015 and suggested that we establish
Highway Solarisation projects to generate electricity and indicated
the numerous advantages of the same. I was requested to make a
presentation to a team of engineers from the Central Engineering
Consultancy Bureau and Mahaweli Ministry and this was done.
Coal-hydro compatibility
Now we can look at the Coal-Hydropower compatibility. We had
been prompting about this since September, 2015 and it is sad
that nobody took any notice of it. I have already mentioned how it
happens and we, in this unique island called Sri Lanka could not
be using any more coal power. It is the economic implication of
Coal-Hydro incompatibility that I intend to address currently.
At a time when the whole world was talking about greenhouse gas
emissions the technocrats and consultants should have studied
and provided a well-informed solution and not a solution
completely rejected by almost all environment conscious
countries in the world. This is more relevant for a small country
like Sri Lanka experiencing the Hadley, Walker Circulations
indicated above. The only other attraction that would have been
there in the coal power plant may have been the possibility of
starting a new trading company to handle the coal imports. This
year 2005 is a very interesting, significant, change-over year for
hydropower in Sri Lanka as during the six years ending in 2005,
the average number of hours of generation of hydropower
capacity has been varying consistently between 2277 and 2773
and never reached even 3,000 hours.