With a dimly lit platform accompanied with eerie background music, the theatrical play Distrito de Molo was seasoned with three unwaveringly quirky characters that offered a sight of amity in enmity. The stage was filled with a whirlwind of varying elements. From Nanay Mauras eccentric lullaby to the multitude of personalities that the Tres Hermanas seemed to portray, the theatrical coliseum was alive. Through a familial atmosphere-coated screenplay, the performance easily connected with its audience, especially to those who were literally connected to Iloilo by heritage, like me. Tres Hermanas de Molo was an act that revolved around the story of three unmarried Locsin sisters that lived in a mansion in Molo, Iloilo. The deviating personas of the characters were already well established since the start of the play. Visitacion, the eldest sister, became the pillar of the household. This role was exemplified by her disciplined nature of which was primarily due to them being orphans. Asuncion, the middle child, was subtly laidback yet still showed a highbrow attitude because of her education. Salvacion, the youngest of the three, was the carefree public high-school graduate of the bunch. She ignited the shows primary conflict, which was all about sibling rivalry based on changing beliefs about marriage and detachment from ancestral traditions. With these contrasting facets, each of them embodied a specific element that greatly affected the piquancy of the story. Visitacion, unknowingly blinded by her very own beliefs, has traversed a life of tradition and convention. This was furthermore displayed through her cold and cruel disposition towards her sisters. Set in the 1950s, the post-war era of the Philippines, religious influences were still highly followed by the people. This became Visitacions foundation of instilling discipline in their household. Some examples of her religious dictums are her steadfast belief about being unmarried as an act of expiation and strict compliance to go to mass every Sunday. However, Asuncion and Salvacion are disgruntled with their sisters creed and both longed for a more compelling life. The disparity eventually led to them getting separated, a process that provided a clear picture on how Visitacion was actually discontented of her life all along. This is where Nanay Mauras motherly love steps into action. As the loyal housekeeper, Nanay Maura has already been a part of the Locsin household ever since the family was established. Her presence has always influenced how the three sisters communicated with each other, particularly after their return from the mass, during their meals, and if they request favors. If Visitacion filled the role of the single-most pillar in their household, Nanay Maura was the thread that connected all of the sisters together. This was showcased during the plays starting and ending sequences, with her singing the lullaby as the three sisters were coming home from church and coming home from their own transgressions. Words with colorful complexities seem to always bewilder the minds of the masses especially when Shakespeares creativity is at work. The inevitable effect of comedy-coated perplexity always seems to appeal to the crowds. Add in some rambunctious laughter and hilarious over-the-top situations, these elements of buffoonery never fail to engage the crowd with the hysterical atmosphere. Katatawanan ng Kalituhan undoubtedly showcased its own version of comical intricacy. Originally written by the master playwright William Shakespeare as Comedy of Errors, the slapstick comedy was enlivened in the Filipino language with the help of Guelan Luarca. With its intrinsically appalling plot about mistaken identities that latter led to fortunate and unfortunate events, Luarcas translation gave it a familiar taste of Filipino sitcoms. During the 80s and 90s, Filipino television shows always had this same form of literary method particularly in Dolphy Quizons movies. As a matter of fact, the farcical side of this type of comedy comes from the main elements that contribute to the plot; nonsensical violent predispositions, receiver of the violence, and an inherently realistic issue that is thought to blatantly affect the viewers in terms of social and mental resolve. All of these factors were effectively manifested by the play, though one particular character intrigued me the most, and that is Adriana, the wife of Antipholus of Ephesus. Her scrupulous character provided a gateway for realism to enter the plot. The main conflict of the story actually started with Adriana longing for her husbands presence during a meal. This simple task eventually became a seed of confusion that developed all throughout the story. As a wife, Adrianas perception towards her relationship with her husband is quite abstruse. One part of her puzzling individuality is that even if she fully understands her autonomy in their marriage, she still believes that her role, being a wife of Antipholus, is the only reason of her identity. This characteristic paint of existence provides a wide coverage for her character canvas. It suggests her unwavering connection to her husband as an extension, if not all, of her being. This nature of Adriana was then furthermore displayed during her argument with Luciana about the supposedly hierarchical system of marriage. She asserted that wives should have equal freedom as their husband, while her unmarried sister, Luciana, stated that wives should be submissive to their husbands. Adriana argued that Luciana was speaking from the point of view of the inexperience and that after marriage she will learn understand. At the end, she experienced a cathartic development that led to harmony in her marriage. Adrianas character was one of the most comprehensive roles in the story. If I were in her place, I wouldve not acted rashly about my husbands absence. I wouldve analyzed the situation without compromising other possibilities. But that would sound cyclical, so Id rather act like the real Adriana herself, a character that epitomized both the yin and the yang of the play.