You are on page 1of 263

Austria Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone AT00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 72.6 49/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 136 27/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 76.3 85/263 Efficiency dimension 75.1 48/263 Innovation dimension 66.4 52/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.6 67/263 68.7 83/263 Technological Readiness 73.0 119/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.1 87/263 Business Sophistication 52.5 39/263
Stability

Infrastructure 47.35 84/263 Market Size 54.7 41/263 Innovation 61.6 41/263

Health 78.7 156/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Mittelfranken, Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig, Obersterreich, Vorarlberg, Zuid-Holland, Tirol,
Kln, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen, Lombardia and land

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Burgenland (AT) AT11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 57.9 125/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 89 134/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 74.0 96/263 Efficiency dimension 63.9 132/263 Innovation dimension 48.0 146/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 71.5 33/263 51.4 212/263 Technological Readiness 73.6 115/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 75.6 71/263 Business Sophistication 34.2 143/263
Stability

Infrastructure 36.58 117/263 Market Size 45.8 66/263 Innovation 34.6 154/263

Health 77.4 168/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Bretagne, Corse, Dorset and Somerset, Umbria, Centre, South Western Scotland, Bourgogne, Lneburg, Kent, Prov. Lige, East Wales, Poitou-
Charentes, Border, Midland and Western, Abruzzo and West Yorkshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Krnten AT21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 60.0 120/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 109 72/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 72.5 100/263 Efficiency dimension 66.6 117/263 Innovation dimension 50.9 136/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.6 60/263 63.5 127/263 Technological Readiness 66.3 146/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.4 60/263 Business Sophistication 38.0 114/263
Stability

Infrastructure 29.62 141/263 Market Size 33.9 116/263 Innovation 44.2 108/263

Health 80.2 136/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Mellersta Norrland, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Mnster, Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Gelderland, Veneto, Weser-Ems, Gieen, Catalua,
Nordjylland, Mazowieckie, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Hampshire and Isle of Wight and Liguria

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Steiermark AT22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.1 98/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 117 57/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 71.9 101/263 Efficiency dimension 70.1 89/263 Innovation dimension 58.8 91/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 72.2 32/263 65.7 111/263 Technological Readiness 71.1 130/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 81.6 30/263 Business Sophistication 40.5 97/263
Stability

Infrastructure 27.00 148/263 Market Size 36.7 101/263 Innovation 57.8 52/263

Health 78.0 165/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lazio, Kassel, Saarland, vre Norrland, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Surrey, East and West Sussex, Vstsverige, Pas Vasco, Emilia
Romagna, Niederbayern, Oberfranken, Hannover, Comunidad Foral de Navarra and Midtjylland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Obersterreich AT31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 64.5 103/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 133 34/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 74.5 94/263 Efficiency dimension 70.4 82/263 Innovation dimension 55.5 114/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.9 39/263 63.1 131/263 Technological Readiness 72.0 124/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 80.8 35/263 Business Sophistication 39.5 105/263
Stability

Infrastructure 34.15 123/263 Market Size 42.1 82/263 Innovation 49.5 77/263

Health 81.4 123/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Zuid-Holland, Kln, Braunschweig, Dsseldorf, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Mittelfranken, Wien and regions covered
by its commuting zone , Lombardia, Bucuresti Ilfov, Oberpfalz, Vorarlberg, Tirol and Unterfranken

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Salzburg AT32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 63.8 105/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 154 17/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 74.7 92/263 Efficiency dimension 68.6 104/263 Innovation dimension 56.8 107/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.6 60/263 60.2 156/263 Technological Readiness 77.2 110/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 84.2 15/263 Business Sophistication 41.8 85/263
Stability

Infrastructure 32.95 128/263 Market Size 38.0 94/263 Innovation 45.4 100/263

Health 83.8 89/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Utrecht, Hovedstaden, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia Autonoma
di Bolzano/Bozen, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Stuttgart, Bremen, North Eastern Scotland,
Darmstadt, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , land and Prov. Antwerpen

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Tirol AT33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.6 95/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 139 25/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 80.2 73/263 Efficiency dimension 70.3 88/263 Innovation dimension 55.7 113/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 74.9 29/263 64.5 119/263 Technological Readiness 73.0 119/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 82.7 26/263 Business Sophistication 34.6 138/263
Stability

Infrastructure 42.64 99/263 Market Size 37.9 95/263 Innovation 55.1 59/263

Health 87.3 39/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Vorarlberg, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen, land, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Mittelfranken, Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Valle
d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig, Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Kln and Lombardia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Austria Vorarlberg AT34

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.2 98/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 139 26/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 77.6 82/263 Efficiency dimension 69.7 93/263 Innovation dimension 56.9 107/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.0 105/263 62.2 143/263 Technological Readiness 74.9 113/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.1 10/28 Labour Market Efficiency 79.2 42/263 Business Sophistication 37.1 122/263
Stability

Infrastructure 43.23 96/263 Market Size 42.9 80/263 Innovation 53.4 62/263

Health 88.1 37/263

Basic Education 63.1 15/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Tirol, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen, land, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Mittelfranken, Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Valle
d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig, Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Kln and Lombardia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone BE00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 84.1 19/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 166 8/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 82.6 66/263 Efficiency dimension 79.3 28/263 Innovation dimension 85.3 8/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 60.2 117/263 71.9 56/263 Technological Readiness 79.6 107/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 65.4 126/263 Business Sophistication 75.1 4/263
Stability

Infrastructure 83.56 6/263 Market Size 69.0 9/263 Innovation 78.0 8/263

Health 82.1 114/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Darmstadt, North Eastern Scotland, Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Stockholm, Utrecht,
Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Salzburg, Oberbayern, le de France, Groningen, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire and
Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Antwerpen BE21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 82.4 21/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 141 23/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 83.6 61/263 Efficiency dimension 81.5 19/263 Innovation dimension 76.3 21/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 67.3 99/263 Technological Readiness 80.3 105/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 80.2 39/263 Business Sophistication 67.2 7/263
Stability

Infrastructure 81.38 8/263 Market Size 68.6 10/263 Innovation 63.1 36/263

Health 80.2 136/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Karlsruhe, land, Tirol, Vorarlberg, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Mittelfranken, Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Valle
d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig, Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Helsinki-Uusimaa and Kln

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Limburg (BE) BE22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.5 39/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 99 104/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 79.2 77/263 Efficiency dimension 78.8 29/263 Innovation dimension 66.3 54/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 63.7 124/263 Technological Readiness 81.5 100/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.3 65/263 Business Sophistication 60.2 18/263
Stability

Infrastructure 65.77 38/263 Market Size 69.8 8/263 Innovation 44.4 107/263

Health 79.0 154/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Trier, Alsace, Eastern Scotland, La Rioja, Zahodna Slovenija, North Yorkshire, Etel-Suomi, Attiki, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire,
Midi-Pyrnes, East Anglia, Aragn, Illes Balears, Zeeland and Pays de la Loire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen BE23

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 79.7 27/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 109 73/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 79.7 76/263 Efficiency dimension 82.8 13/263 Innovation dimension 69.9 36/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 70.6 69/263 Technological Readiness 79.4 108/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 81.7 30/263 Business Sophistication 53.9 33/263
Stability

Infrastructure 74.47 17/263 Market Size 66.0 17/263 Innovation 63.3 35/263

Health 74.2 181/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Mnster, Krnten, Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Mellersta Norrland, Gieen, Catalua, Nordjylland, Gelderland, Veneto, Weser-Ems,
Mazowieckie, Liguria, Rhne-Alpes and Overijssel

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. West-Vlaanderen BE25

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.8 58/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 116 59/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 75.9 87/263 Efficiency dimension 77.1 39/263 Innovation dimension 58.6 91/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 67.3 99/263 Technological Readiness 76.6 111/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.1 20/263 Business Sophistication 50.2 46/263
Stability

Infrastructure 65.39 41/263 Market Size 53.1 48/263 Innovation 40.5 127/263

Health 70.1 196/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kassel, Surrey, East and West Sussex, Steiermark, Lazio, Oberfranken, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Midtjylland, Saarland, vre Norrland,
Arnsberg, Syddanmark, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Vstsverige, Pas Vasco and Hampshire and Isle of Wight

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Hainaut BE32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.0 147/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 78 176/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 67.4 114/263 Efficiency dimension 57.4 155/263 Innovation dimension 53.1 125/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.0 134/263 52.4 202/263 Technological Readiness 67.9 144/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 47.0 203/263 Business Sophistication 47.0 57/263
Stability

Infrastructure 64.67 44/263 Market Size 52.0 51/263 Innovation 37.8 136/263

Health 58.0 213/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Algarve, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Jihovchod, Canarias, Notio Aigaio, Martinique, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, South
Yorkshire, Franche-Comt, Molise, Dolnoslaskie, Comunidad Valenciana, Eesti and Regin de Murcia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Lige BE33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 59.1 122/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 88 138/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 73.0 99/263 Efficiency dimension 62.4 137/263 Innovation dimension 56.7 110/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.0 134/263 59.9 161/263 Technological Readiness 70.0 137/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 55.9 166/263 Business Sophistication 46.4 62/263
Stability

Infrastructure 75.48 16/263 Market Size 47.1 61/263 Innovation 46.0 94/263

Health 65.8 206/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kent, Poitou-Charentes, Lneburg, Border, Midland and Western, Abruzzo, Thringen, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, West Midlands, Sachsen-
Anhalt, South Western Scotland, Auvergne, Burgenland (AT), Bretagne, Corse and Castilla y Len

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Luxembourg (BE) BE34

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 54.8 136/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 78 178/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 65.6 123/263 Efficiency dimension 60.7 146/263 Innovation dimension 52.9 130/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.0 134/263 62.7 137/263 Technological Readiness 75.4 112/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.6 148/263 Business Sophistication 41.5 88/263
Stability

Infrastructure 64.45 46/263 Market Size 33.5 119/263 Innovation 37.2 143/263

Health 53.0 223/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Algarve, Prov. Hainaut, Jihovchod, Canarias, Martinique, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, South Yorkshire, Notio Aigaio,
Molise, Dolnoslaskie, Franche-Comt, Eesti, Regin de Murcia and Comunidad Valenciana

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Belgium Prov. Namur BE35

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 59.7 121/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 84 156/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 66.0 120/263 Efficiency dimension 65.4 121/263 Innovation dimension 57.8 99/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.0 134/263 61.2 149/263 Technological Readiness 74.2 114/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
62.5 17/28 Labour Market Efficiency 67.4 116/263 Business Sophistication 47.8 55/263
Stability

Infrastructure 65.49 41/263 Market Size 43.0 79/263 Innovation 43.6 111/263

Health 53.3 220/263

Basic Education 71.4 9/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Cantabria, Devon, Northern Ireland,
Malta, Lancashire, Kpros, Basse-Normandie, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais, Languedoc-Roussillon and Chemnitz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Bulgaria Severozapaden BG31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 1.9 258/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 29 263/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 3.9 258/263 Efficiency dimension 29.6 248/263 Innovation dimension 3.1 259/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 6.0 262/263 44.2 241/263 Technological Readiness 0.0 263/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.6 5/28 Labour Market Efficiency 28.3 237/263 Business Sophistication 12.8 236/263
Stability

Infrastructure 6.08 240/263 Market Size 1.1 262/263 Innovation 8.5 252/263

Health 26.0 260/263

Basic Education 0.9 27/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Yuzhen tsentralen, Severen tsentralen, Nord Est (RO), Severoiztochen, Yugoiztochen, Sud Vest Oltenia, szak-Magyarorszg, szak-Alfld, Sud
Muntenia, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest and Warminsko-Mazurskie

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability S W N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Bulgaria Severen tsentralen BG32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 8.5 245/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 32 261/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 9.9 242/263 Efficiency dimension 34.9 235/263 Innovation dimension 7.0 255/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 12.6 257/263 47.5 228/263 Technological Readiness 12.5 259/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.6 5/28 Labour Market Efficiency 35.9 230/263 Business Sophistication 10.3 246/263
Stability

Infrastructure 5.23 244/263 Market Size 4.5 253/263 Innovation 10.4 247/263

Health 37.4 246/263

Basic Education 0.9 27/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Yuzhen tsentralen, Nord Est (RO), Severozapaden, Severoiztochen, Yugoiztochen, Sud Vest Oltenia, szak-Magyarorszg, szak-Alfld, Sud
Muntenia, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest and Warminsko-Mazurskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability S W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Bulgaria Severoiztochen BG33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 14.2 238/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 38 259/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 15.8 237/263 Efficiency dimension 39.1 225/263 Innovation dimension 10.4 253/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 26.1 224/263 51.8 208/263 Technological Readiness 11.5 260/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.6 5/28 Labour Market Efficiency 43.2 214/263 Business Sophistication 17.8 222/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.03 236/263 Market Size 3.5 255/263 Innovation 11.3 245/263

Health 40.0 240/263

Basic Education 0.9 27/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Yugoiztochen, Sud Vest Oltenia, szak-Magyarorszg, szak-Alfld, Sud Muntenia, Nord Est (RO), Severen tsentralen, Dl-Dunntl, Yuzhen
tsentralen, Dl-Alfld, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest, Severozapaden and Warminsko-Mazurskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Bulgaria Yugoiztochen BG34

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 6.0 253/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 39 258/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 7.5 247/263 Efficiency dimension 33.1 241/263 Innovation dimension 4.7 258/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 10.6 259/263 43.8 244/263 Technological Readiness 9.1 262/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.6 5/28 Labour Market Efficiency 39.5 222/263 Business Sophistication 11.5 243/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.83 230/263 Market Size 1.5 261/263 Innovation 6.1 254/263

Health 30.8 257/263

Basic Education 0.9 27/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Severoiztochen, Sud Vest Oltenia, szak-Magyarorszg, szak-Alfld, Sud Muntenia, Nord Est (RO), Dl-Dunntl, Severen tsentralen, Yuzhen
tsentralen, Dl-Alfld, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie and Sud Est

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Bulgaria Yugozapaden BG41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 30.5 207/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 75 187/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 12.2 241/263 Efficiency dimension 55.5 166/263 Innovation dimension 34.6 179/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 0.0 263/263 68.2 88/263 Technological Readiness 21.6 248/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.6 5/28 Labour Market Efficiency 59.1 152/263 Business Sophistication 39.7 103/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.38 215/263 Market Size 11.6 222/263 Innovation 39.5 131/263

Health 51.5 226/263

Basic Education 0.9 27/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Regin de Murcia, Eesti, Sardegna, Tees Valley and Durham, Dolnoslaskie, Molise, Jihozpad, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta,
Martinique, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Guadeloupe, Lietuva, Castilla-La Mancha and Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Bulgaria Yuzhen tsentralen BG42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 11.0 243/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 32 262/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 12.8 239/263 Efficiency dimension 37.1 228/263 Innovation dimension 6.7 256/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 17.4 246/263 48.4 224/263 Technological Readiness 10.0 261/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.6 5/28 Labour Market Efficiency 42.8 216/263 Business Sophistication 10.7 245/263
Stability

Infrastructure 9.03 222/263 Market Size 3.0 256/263 Innovation 11.6 242/263

Health 38.3 245/263

Basic Education 0.9 27/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Severen tsentralen, Nord Est (RO), Severozapaden, Severoiztochen, Yugoiztochen, Sud Vest Oltenia, szak-Magyarorszg, szak-Alfld, Sud
Muntenia, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest and Warminsko-Mazurskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Cyprus Kpros CY00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 37.1 184/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 85 152/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 26.6 232/263 Efficiency dimension 55.7 162/263 Innovation dimension 39.8 166/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 48.1 151/263 69.8 75/263 Technological Readiness 43.2 199/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.8 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 49.2 194/263 Business Sophistication 43.5 76/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.07 217/263 Market Size 19.2 186/263 Innovation 29.1 174/263

Health 94.1 5/263

Basic Education 0.0 28/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Basse-Normandie, Malta, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais, Chemnitz, Castilla y Len, Auvergne, Devon, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire
and Nottinghamshire, Thringen, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western and Poitou-Charentes

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N W

Health
S

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone CZ00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 64.7 102/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 124 45/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 59.6 146/263 Efficiency dimension 69.8 93/263 Innovation dimension 64.3 62/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 35.6 202/263 70.8 67/263 Technological Readiness 80.5 104/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.4 95/263 Business Sophistication 44.2 72/263
Stability

Infrastructure 32.22 132/263 Market Size 36.8 98/263 Innovation 59.2 51/263

Health 74.4 180/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Cheshire, Schwaben, Detmold, Freiburg, Hannover, Niederbayern, Comunidad de Madrid, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Unterfranken, Emilia
Romagna, Pas Vasco, Vstsverige, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Oberpfalz and vre Norrland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Jihozpad CZ03

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 43.9 166/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 74 190/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.6 170/263 Efficiency dimension 54.9 170/263 Innovation dimension 40.0 165/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 37.4 191/263 63.3 130/263 Technological Readiness 73.7 115/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 58.0 156/263 Business Sophistication 21.3 207/263
Stability

Infrastructure 21.06 173/263 Market Size 18.2 190/263 Innovation 29.2 174/263

Health 63.9 207/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Tees Valley and Durham, Sardegna, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Guadeloupe, Yugozapaden, Lietuva, Regin de Murcia, Castilla-La Mancha,
Eesti, Dolnoslaskie, Molise, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Wielkopolskie and Martinique

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Severozpad CZ04

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 35.5 189/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 63 220/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 49.4 194/263 Efficiency dimension 47.6 197/263 Innovation dimension 32.1 190/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.3 210/263 52.5 202/263 Technological Readiness 62.6 158/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 46.9 203/263 Business Sophistication 20.4 214/263
Stability

Infrastructure 26.02 152/263 Market Size 23.8 159/263 Innovation 19.3 211/263

Health 55.1 217/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Ldzkie, Campania, Extremadura, Latvija, Kriti, Sicilia, Norte, Puglia, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Calabria, Stredn
Slovensko, Peloponnisos and Malopolskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Severovchod CZ05

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 46.6 159/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 68 206/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 59.2 147/263 Efficiency dimension 55.9 162/263 Innovation dimension 41.7 161/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.9 195/263 64.3 119/263 Technological Readiness 71.9 124/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 55.6 168/263 Business Sophistication 21.6 205/263
Stability

Infrastructure 38.61 112/263 Market Size 21.8 168/263 Innovation 34.8 152/263

Health 67.1 203/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Nyugat-Dunntl, West Wales and The Valleys, Vzhodna Slovenija, Dytiki Makedonia,
Centro (PT), Runion, Ionia Nisia, Alentejo, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Regio Autnoma dos Aores and Basilicata

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Jihovchod CZ06

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 50.0 151/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 78 175/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 57.2 156/263 Efficiency dimension 59.1 153/263 Innovation dimension 48.1 144/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 38.2 188/263 67.0 101/263 Technological Readiness 72.7 121/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 61.4 143/263 Business Sophistication 24.6 196/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.93 152/263 Market Size 21.8 168/263 Innovation 47.3 85/263

Health 69.6 198/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Hainaut, Canarias, Algarve, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Notio Aigaio, Franche-Comt, Comunidad Valenciana,
Martinique, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, South Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, Limousin, Lorraine and Galicia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Stredn Morava CZ07

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 44.2 164/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 68 208/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 56.6 159/263 Efficiency dimension 54.6 171/263 Innovation dimension 38.5 170/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.2 201/263 61.5 148/263 Technological Readiness 70.3 134/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 56.3 162/263 Business Sophistication 20.7 212/263
Stability

Infrastructure 30.80 139/263 Market Size 21.6 172/263 Innovation 29.0 174/263

Health 66.4 204/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Nyugat-Dunntl, Andaluca, Severovchod, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Vzhodna Slovenija, West Wales and The Valleys, Centro (PT), Ionia
Nisia, Dytiki Makedonia, Runion, Alentejo, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Regio Autnoma dos Aores and Basilicata

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Czech Republic Moravskoslezsko CZ08

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 43.6 167/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 70 200/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 52.7 177/263 Efficiency dimension 56.0 160/263 Innovation dimension 36.6 176/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 33.9 205/263 63.0 131/263 Technological Readiness 69.1 141/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
76.1 8/28 Labour Market Efficiency 53.2 177/263 Business Sophistication 20.0 216/263
Stability

Infrastructure 23.38 162/263 Market Size 26.4 150/263 Innovation 25.8 188/263

Health 62.9 208/263

Basic Education 62.0 16/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Slaskie, Alentejo, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Runion, Basilicata, Dytiki Makedonia, Zpadn Slovensko, West Wales and The Valleys,
Wielkopolskie, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Severovchod, Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl and Castilla-La Mancha

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone DE00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 74.5 45/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 88/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 88.4 40/263 Efficiency dimension 72.0 69/263 Innovation dimension 71.6 28/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 65.3 106/263 65.4 112/263 Technological Readiness 85.2 96/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 70.1 105/263 Business Sophistication 52.4 40/263
Stability

Infrastructure 58.87 57/263 Market Size 53.2 47/263 Innovation 64.4 30/263

Health 85.4 75/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Smland med arna, Sydsverige, Koblenz, Lisboa, Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Overijssel, Rhne-Alpes, Liguria, Mazowieckie, Friuli Venezia
Giulia, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen and Schleswig-Holstein

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Stuttgart DE11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 83.8 20/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 161 12/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 90.3 28/263 Efficiency dimension 83.2 12/263 Innovation dimension 73.3 25/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.2 55/263 67.8 93/263 Technological Readiness 87.4 86/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 88.0 4/263 Business Sophistication 43.4 76/263
Stability

Infrastructure 55.76 64/263 Market Size 65.6 18/263 Innovation 77.8 9/263

Health 88.5 32/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Bremen, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , North Eastern Scotland, Darmstadt, Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Bruxelles and regions
covered by its commuting zone , Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Salzburg, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia
Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Stockholm and Oberbayern

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Karlsruhe DE12

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 85.2 14/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 141 24/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 95.8 3/263 Efficiency dimension 82.6 14/263 Innovation dimension 75.6 24/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.2 55/263 67.8 93/263 Technological Readiness 87.4 86/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 84.7 12/263 Business Sophistication 45.9 63/263
Stability

Infrastructure 78.28 14/263 Market Size 66.8 13/263 Innovation 80.7 7/263

Health 87.3 39/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Antwerpen, land, Tirol, Vorarlberg, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Mittelfranken, Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Valle
d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig, Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Helsinki-Uusimaa and Kln

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Freiburg DE13

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 76.3 37/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 122 47/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 90.0 31/263 Efficiency dimension 78.3 31/263 Innovation dimension 63.5 67/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.2 55/263 65.3 112/263 Technological Readiness 87.4 86/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 87.8 5/263 Business Sophistication 31.9 156/263
Stability

Infrastructure 59.27 55/263 Market Size 55.2 38/263 Innovation 65.9 27/263

Health 85.0 77/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Hannover, Detmold, Niederbayern, Emilia Romagna, Pas Vasco, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Vstsverige, Rheinhessen-
Pfalz, Cheshire, vre Norrland, Saarland, Schwaben, Lazio, Steiermark and Comunidad de Madrid

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Tbingen DE14

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 79.6 27/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 135 29/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 87.0 45/263 Efficiency dimension 81.8 17/263 Innovation dimension 67.1 48/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.2 55/263 70.7 69/263 Technological Readiness 87.4 86/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 87.4 6/263 Business Sophistication 31.4 159/263
Stability

Infrastructure 46.20 90/263 Market Size 57.6 32/263 Innovation 75.6 12/263

Health 86.2 63/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Noord-Brabant, Mittelfranken, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Dsseldorf, Braunschweig,
Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Kln, Vorarlberg, Tirol, Lombardia, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen and land

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Oberbayern DE21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 89.7 9/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 180 6/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.7 19/263 Efficiency dimension 85.8 9/263 Innovation dimension 83.1 11/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 71.4 59/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 93.6 2/263 Business Sophistication 52.9 36/263
Stability

Infrastructure 61.45 51/263 Market Size 62.4 23/263 Innovation 90.9 4/263

Health 87.6 39/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: le de France, Groningen, Stockholm, Bratislavsk kraj, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Darmstadt, North Eastern Scotland,
Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Salzburg and Hamburg

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Niederbayern DE22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 66.6 89/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 121 49/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 83.2 63/263 Efficiency dimension 71.8 73/263 Innovation dimension 54.0 120/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 61.7 145/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 85.1 10/263 Business Sophistication 30.6 164/263
Stability

Infrastructure 45.48 91/263 Market Size 44.1 73/263 Innovation 41.5 121/263

Health 75.2 178/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Hannover, Freiburg, Detmold, Emilia Romagna, Pas Vasco, Vstsverige, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
vre Norrland, Saarland, Cheshire, Schwaben, Lazio, Steiermark and Comunidad de Madrid

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Oberpfalz DE23

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 71.9 54/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 128 39/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 86.5 49/263 Efficiency dimension 72.9 64/263 Innovation dimension 63.8 66/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 65.1 114/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 84.3 14/263 Business Sophistication 34.0 145/263
Stability

Infrastructure 53.66 69/263 Market Size 43.2 78/263 Innovation 62.9 37/263

Health 78.6 156/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Bucuresti Ilfov, Unterfranken, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Comunidad de Madrid, Lombardia, Schwaben, Cheshire, Kln, Praha and regions
covered by its commuting zone , Zuid-Holland, Obersterreich, Detmold, Freiburg, Braunschweig and Hannover

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Oberfranken DE24

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.7 58/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 113 61/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 86.5 49/263 Efficiency dimension 73.5 59/263 Innovation dimension 59.9 86/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 64.4 119/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.2 20/263 Business Sophistication 35.2 136/263
Stability

Infrastructure 51.91 74/263 Market Size 46.8 62/263 Innovation 51.3 71/263

Health 79.8 144/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Midtjylland, Arnsberg, Syddanmark, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area,
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Weser-Ems, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Veneto, Gelderland, Kassel, Mellersta Norrland, Krnten and Steiermark

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Mittelfranken DE25

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 78.3 32/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 135 28/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 92.5 15/263 Efficiency dimension 76.4 42/263 Innovation dimension 70.8 30/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 63.7 124/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 86.3 7/263 Business Sophistication 40.1 101/263
Stability

Infrastructure 69.18 29/263 Market Size 53.4 46/263 Innovation 74.0 13/263

Health 84.2 84/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig,
Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Kln, Vorarlberg, Tirol, Lombardia, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen and land

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Unterfranken DE26

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 74.2 46/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 126 40/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 93.8 9/263 Efficiency dimension 76.2 43/263 Innovation dimension 60.2 85/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 67.0 101/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 82.5 27/263 Business Sophistication 31.7 158/263
Stability

Infrastructure 73.25 20/263 Market Size 51.6 52/263 Innovation 56.2 55/263

Health 84.8 79/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Comunidad de Madrid, Schwaben, Oberpfalz, Bucuresti Ilfov, Cheshire, Praha and regions covered by its
commuting zone , Lombardia, Detmold, Freiburg, Hannover, Niederbayern, Kln, Emilia Romagna and Zuid-Holland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Schwaben DE27

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 72.3 51/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 125 43/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 92.1 18/263 Efficiency dimension 75.4 46/263 Innovation dimension 57.4 101/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.8 39/263 63.5 127/263 Technological Readiness 88.5 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.4 19/263 Business Sophistication 30.2 168/263
Stability

Infrastructure 68.25 32/263 Market Size 53.7 44/263 Innovation 50.9 73/263

Health 83.6 89/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Cheshire, Comunidad de Madrid, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Unterfranken, Detmold,
Oberpfalz, Freiburg, Bucuresti Ilfov, Hannover, Niederbayern, Emilia Romagna, Pas Vasco, Vstsverige and Rheinhessen-Pfalz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Bremen DE50

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.2 65/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 162 11/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 87.4 43/263 Efficiency dimension 68.8 103/263 Innovation dimension 66.5 52/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 59.7 163/263 Technological Readiness 90.7 39/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.6 76/263 Business Sophistication 43.4 76/263
Stability

Infrastructure 61.92 48/263 Market Size 48.3 58/263 Innovation 56.7 54/263

Health 77.1 169/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Stuttgart, North Eastern Scotland, Darmstadt, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Bruxelles and regions covered by
its commuting zone , Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Salzburg, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia
Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Stockholm and Oberbayern

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Hamburg DE60

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 85.3 14/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 207 2/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 89.9 32/263 Efficiency dimension 81.1 21/263 Innovation dimension 81.4 13/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.9 81/263 65.2 114/263 Technological Readiness 91.5 32/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 84.8 11/263 Business Sophistication 63.1 12/263
Stability

Infrastructure 60.23 54/263 Market Size 66.2 15/263 Innovation 71.5 17/263

Health 86.1 63/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Bratislavsk kraj, Groningen, le de France, Oberbayern, Stockholm, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Darmstadt, North
Eastern Scotland, Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its
commuting zone and Salzburg

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Darmstadt DE71

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 86.7 13/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 164 9/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 95.6 4/263 Efficiency dimension 81.9 17/263 Innovation dimension 80.6 15/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 66.2 107/263 Technological Readiness 90.3 46/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.9 17/263 Business Sophistication 62.7 13/263
Stability

Infrastructure 79.10 13/263 Market Size 67.8 11/263 Innovation 71.0 20/263

Health 87.7 39/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: North Eastern Scotland, Bremen, Stuttgart, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , London and regions covered by its commuting
zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Salzburg, Stockholm, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire,
Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa and Oberbayern

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Gieen DE72

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.6 39/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 108 77/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 90.1 30/263 Efficiency dimension 76.7 41/263 Innovation dimension 63.6 67/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 67.7 93/263 Technological Readiness 90.3 46/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 80.3 36/263 Business Sophistication 34.8 138/263
Stability

Infrastructure 66.69 35/263 Market Size 54.0 43/263 Innovation 59.9 47/263

Health 81.2 124/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Catalua, Nordjylland, stra Mellansverige, Limburg (NL), Mazowieckie, Mnster, Liguria, Rhne-Alpes, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Overijssel, Kzp-
Magyarorszg, Krnten, Toscana, Lisboa and Mellersta Norrland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Kassel DE73

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.8 67/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 116 58/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 90.9 26/263 Efficiency dimension 71.2 78/263 Innovation dimension 59.6 88/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 62.4 140/263 Technological Readiness 90.3 46/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 81.6 30/263 Business Sophistication 41.1 90/263
Stability

Infrastructure 72.23 24/263 Market Size 44.5 70/263 Innovation 42.0 120/263

Health 79.2 151/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Steiermark, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Lazio, Surrey, East and West Sussex, Saarland, vre Norrland, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Vstsverige, Pas Vasco,
Oberfranken, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Midtjylland, Emilia Romagna, Arnsberg and Syddanmark

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DE80

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 57.6 126/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 83 157/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 80.9 72/263 Efficiency dimension 59.3 151/263 Innovation dimension 52.1 131/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.6 67/263 60.5 152/263 Technological Readiness 80.3 105/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 66.0 123/263 Business Sophistication 39.4 105/263
Stability

Infrastructure 35.73 120/263 Market Size 27.6 148/263 Innovation 33.1 160/263

Health 78.3 161/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Namur, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Cantabria, Devon, Northern Ireland, Lancashire,
Malta, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Kpros, Basse-Normandie, Languedoc-Roussillon, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais and Chemnitz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Braunschweig DE91

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 72.9 48/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 134 33/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 89.1 36/263 Efficiency dimension 69.3 97/263 Innovation dimension 71.6 28/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 71.0 35/263 60.5 152/263 Technological Readiness 91.0 34/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.4 60/263 Business Sophistication 41.0 90/263
Stability

Infrastructure 61.30 52/263 Market Size 46.0 65/263 Innovation 72.9 14/263

Health 80.1 136/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dsseldorf, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Mittelfranken, Obersterreich, Wien and regions covered by its commuting
zone , Zuid-Holland, Kln, Lombardia, Vorarlberg, Tirol, Karlsruhe, Bucuresti Ilfov and Oberpfalz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Hannover DE92

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 72.2 52/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 121 48/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.8 19/263 Efficiency dimension 71.0 80/263 Innovation dimension 65.3 58/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 71.0 35/263 60.0 160/263 Technological Readiness 91.0 34/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.2 52/263 Business Sophistication 41.1 90/263
Stability

Infrastructure 71.68 25/263 Market Size 51.1 53/263 Innovation 56.3 55/263

Health 80.1 136/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Freiburg, Niederbayern, Detmold, Emilia Romagna, Pas Vasco, Vstsverige, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Rheinhessen-Pfalz,
Cheshire, vre Norrland, Saarland, Schwaben, Lazio, Steiermark and Comunidad de Madrid

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Lneburg DE93

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 67.5 85/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 88 136/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 85.4 53/263 Efficiency dimension 69.5 97/263 Innovation dimension 57.0 105/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 71.0 35/263 57.1 178/263 Technological Readiness 91.0 34/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 79.1 44/263 Business Sophistication 37.6 119/263
Stability

Infrastructure 51.91 74/263 Market Size 50.0 55/263 Innovation 38.7 134/263

Health 76.6 173/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kent, Prov. Lige, Poitou-Charentes, Border, Midland and Western, Abruzzo, Thringen, South Western Scotland, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire,
West Midlands, Burgenland (AT), Sachsen-Anhalt, Bretagne, Corse, Dorset and Somerset and Umbria

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Weser-Ems DE94

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 63.8 105/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 111 68/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 84.9 55/263 Efficiency dimension 67.8 109/263 Innovation dimension 53.3 123/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 71.0 35/263 58.5 170/263 Technological Readiness 91.0 34/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.7 58/263 Business Sophistication 33.9 145/263
Stability

Infrastructure 47.75 82/263 Market Size 44.5 70/263 Innovation 33.5 159/263

Health 78.2 164/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Veneto, Gelderland, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Mellersta Norrland, Krnten, Prov. Oost-
Vlaanderen, Syddanmark, Arnsberg, Mnster, Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Midtjylland, Comunidad Foral de Navarra and Oberfranken

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Dsseldorf DEA1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 78.3 32/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 134 32/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 93.9 9/263 Efficiency dimension 78.3 31/263 Innovation dimension 66.8 51/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.4 82/263 56.3 185/263 Technological Readiness 89.0 62/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.3 87/263 Business Sophistication 51.0 43/263
Stability

Infrastructure 80.31 10/263 Market Size 82.1 3/263 Innovation 49.9 75/263

Health 83.2 104/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Braunschweig, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Mittelfranken, Obersterreich, Wien and regions covered by its commuting
zone , Zuid-Holland, Kln, Lombardia, Vorarlberg, Tirol, Karlsruhe, Bucuresti Ilfov and Prov. Antwerpen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Kln DEA2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 81.7 23/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 132 36/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 95.4 5/263 Efficiency dimension 79.6 27/263 Innovation dimension 72.2 27/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.4 82/263 62.5 140/263 Technological Readiness 89.0 62/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.4 64/263 Business Sophistication 50.2 46/263
Stability

Infrastructure 80.35 10/263 Market Size 73.7 6/263 Innovation 65.2 29/263

Health 87.5 39/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Zuid-Holland, Obersterreich, Lombardia, Braunschweig, Dsseldorf, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Mittelfranken, Wien
and regions covered by its commuting zone , Bucuresti Ilfov, Oberpfalz, Unterfranken, Provincia Autonoma di Trento and Vorarlberg

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Mnster DEA3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 72.6 49/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 109 74/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 90.4 28/263 Efficiency dimension 74.7 52/263 Innovation dimension 59.1 89/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.4 82/263 60.3 156/263 Technological Readiness 89.0 62/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.0 82/263 Business Sophistication 41.1 90/263
Stability

Infrastructure 68.34 32/263 Market Size 65.0 19/263 Innovation 41.7 121/263

Health 82.0 114/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Gieen, Krnten, Catalua, Nordjylland, Mellersta Norrland, Mazowieckie, Liguria,
Gelderland, Rhne-Alpes, Veneto, Overijssel and Weser-Ems

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Detmold DEA4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.2 72/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 121 46/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 88.5 38/263 Efficiency dimension 71.7 73/263 Innovation dimension 58.0 97/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.4 82/263 58.1 173/263 Technological Readiness 89.0 62/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.8 55/263 Business Sophistication 32.5 151/263
Stability

Infrastructure 58.07 59/263 Market Size 56.1 35/263 Innovation 49.3 78/263

Health 84.4 83/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Freiburg, Hannover, Niederbayern, Emilia Romagna, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Pas Vasco, Vstsverige, Rheinhessen-
Pfalz, Cheshire, vre Norrland, Schwaben, Saarland, Lazio, Comunidad de Madrid and Steiermark

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Arnsberg DEA5

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.9 58/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 112 64/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.6 19/263 Efficiency dimension 72.9 64/263 Innovation dimension 58.7 91/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.4 82/263 56.2 185/263 Technological Readiness 89.0 62/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.3 87/263 Business Sophistication 35.7 130/263
Stability

Infrastructure 74.51 17/263 Market Size 66.5 14/263 Innovation 47.2 87/263

Health 80.9 129/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Syddanmark, Midtjylland, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Oberfranken, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath
area, Weser-Ems, Veneto, Gelderland, Surrey, East and West Sussex, Mellersta Norrland, Krnten, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen and Mnster

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Koblenz DEB1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.0 75/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 106 87/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.1 24/263 Efficiency dimension 72.0 69/263 Innovation dimension 53.6 121/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.7 51/263 56.6 183/263 Technological Readiness 90.0 51/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.5 49/263 Business Sophistication 32.0 156/263
Stability

Infrastructure 69.98 28/263 Market Size 58.5 28/263 Innovation 37.4 141/263

Health 79.7 144/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Smland med arna, Sydsverige, Lisboa, Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Overijssel, Rhne-
Alpes, Liguria, Mazowieckie, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen, Friuli Venezia Giulia and Schleswig-Holstein

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Trier DEB2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 64.9 101/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 98 105/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 84.2 58/263 Efficiency dimension 67.8 109/263 Innovation dimension 54.9 115/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.7 51/263 58.9 168/263 Technological Readiness 90.0 51/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.8 93/263 Business Sophistication 34.7 138/263
Stability

Infrastructure 46.80 86/263 Market Size 48.4 57/263 Innovation 37.5 139/263

Health 77.2 169/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Alsace, Eastern Scotland, Prov. Limburg (BE), Zahodna Slovenija, La Rioja, North Yorkshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Midi-
Pyrnes, Etel-Suomi, Attiki, East Anglia, Aragn, Illes Balears, Pays de la Loire and Zeeland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Rheinhessen-Pfalz DEB3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 77.7 34/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 119 53/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 92.3 16/263 Efficiency dimension 77.5 36/263 Innovation dimension 67.4 46/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.7 51/263 62.0 144/263 Technological Readiness 90.0 51/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.1 20/263 Business Sophistication 39.9 102/263
Stability

Infrastructure 71.47 26/263 Market Size 62.1 24/263 Innovation 64.1 32/263

Health 82.0 114/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Vstsverige, Pas Vasco, Emilia Romagna, vre Norrland, Saarland, Niederbayern, Lazio, Hannover, Freiburg, Steiermark, Detmold, Kassel, Prov.
West-Vlaanderen, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone and Surrey, East and West Sussex

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


#N/A #N/A Dec-00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 #N/A NA/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 #N/A /263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 #N/A
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension #N/A NA/263 Efficiency dimension #N/A NA/263 Innovation dimension #N/A NA/263

Higher Education and


Institutions #N/A NA/263 #N/A NA/263 Technological Readiness #N/A NA/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
#N/A NA/28 Labour Market Efficiency #N/A NA/263 Business Sophistication #N/A NA/263
Stability

Infrastructure #N/A NA/263 Market Size #N/A NA/263 Innovation #N/A NA/263

Health #N/A NA/263

Basic Education #N/A NA/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

#N/A

RCI 2016 #
###

Basic dimension # Efficiency dimension #


## ## Innovation dimension ###

Higher Education and


Institutions # # Technological Readiness
## lifelong learning ## ###
Macroeconomic
# Labour Market Efficiency # Business Sophistication
Stability ## ## ###

Infrastructure # Market Size # Innovation


## ## ###

Health #
##

Basic Education #
##

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Dresden DED2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.2 65/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 93 121/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 81.9 68/263 Efficiency dimension 71.7 73/263 Innovation dimension 64.0 63/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.2 78/263 71.0 66/263 Technological Readiness 81.5 100/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 75.6 71/263 Business Sophistication 42.5 83/263
Stability

Infrastructure 33.28 126/263 Market Size 39.0 92/263 Innovation 59.5 49/263

Health 83.3 89/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Champagne-Ardenne, Haute-Normandie, Aquitaine, Marche, Drenthe, Highlands and Islands, Greater Manchester,
West Yorkshire, Friesland (NL), Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, East Wales, Pays de la Loire and Illes Balears

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Chemnitz DED4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.9 92/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 85 148/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 80.0 75/263 Efficiency dimension 69.1 102/263 Innovation dimension 57.4 101/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.2 78/263 64.8 117/263 Technological Readiness 81.5 100/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.0 82/263 Business Sophistication 43.0 80/263
Stability

Infrastructure 28.66 144/263 Market Size 42.1 82/263 Innovation 41.6 121/263

Health 81.1 124/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Castilla y Len, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland, Basse-Normandie, Auvergne, Kpros, Malta, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire and
Nottinghamshire, Thringen, Abruzzo, Devon, Border, Midland and Western and Poitou-Charentes

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Leipzig DED5

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.6 68/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 102 96/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 85.3 54/263 Efficiency dimension 70.4 82/263 Innovation dimension 62.5 72/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.2 78/263 71.3 63/263 Technological Readiness 81.5 100/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 68.4 109/263 Business Sophistication 45.6 67/263
Stability

Infrastructure 48.32 79/263 Market Size 41.4 85/263 Innovation 52.0 68/263

Health 81.7 121/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Norra Mellansverige, Lnsi-Suomi, Zeeland, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Aragn, Piemonte, East Anglia, Attiki, Etel-Suomi, Schleswig-Holstein,
Friuli Venezia Giulia, La Rioja, Prov. Limburg (BE), Trier and Alsace

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Sachsen-Anhalt DEE0

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 61.2 114/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 86 145/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 82.9 64/263 Efficiency dimension 63.2 134/263 Innovation dimension 53.0 125/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 63.9 113/263 60.6 152/263 Technological Readiness 84.2 98/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 69.0 107/263 Business Sophistication 37.8 116/263
Stability

Infrastructure 53.20 72/263 Market Size 36.1 106/263 Innovation 34.0 155/263

Health 75.5 176/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: West Midlands, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Thringen, Auvergne, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western, Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Poitou-
Charentes, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland, Prov. Lige, Basse-Normandie, Kent and Kpros

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Schleswig-Holstein DEF0

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 68.6 78/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 104 92/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 84.1 58/263 Efficiency dimension 69.2 101/263 Innovation dimension 63.0 70/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 71.4 34/263 58.8 168/263 Technological Readiness 90.4 46/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.5 49/263 Business Sophistication 45.0 69/263
Stability

Infrastructure 38.93 110/263 Market Size 47.3 60/263 Innovation 45.9 94/263

Health 82.2 114/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Friuli Venezia Giulia, Piemonte, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Lnsi-Suomi, Leipzig, Sydsverige, Smland med arna, Berlin and regions covered by
its commuting zone , Norra Mellansverige, Koblenz, Zeeland, Lisboa, Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg and Overijssel

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Germany Thringen DEG0

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 66.5 91/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 87 142/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 82.1 67/263 Efficiency dimension 70.2 89/263 Innovation dimension 54.7 118/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 65.0 111/263 67.1 101/263 Technological Readiness 86.3 93/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
80.2 6/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.5 49/263 Business Sophistication 28.9 176/263
Stability

Infrastructure 41.08 105/263 Market Size 37.7 96/263 Innovation 47.2 87/263

Health 80.9 129/263

Basic Education 78.3 7/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western, Poitou-Charentes, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, West Midlands, Sachsen-Anhalt, Prov. Lige, Kent,
Auvergne, Lneburg, Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland and Basse-Normandie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S S W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Denmark Hovedstaden DK01

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 92.9 6/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 158 14/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 89.8 32/263 Efficiency dimension 87.9 7/263 Innovation dimension 88.6 4/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 79.0 18/263 100.0 1/263 Technological Readiness 92.4 29/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
81.9 3/28 Labour Market Efficiency 82.9 24/263 Business Sophistication 54.4 32/263
Stability

Infrastructure 33.77 124/263 Market Size 35.6 109/263 Innovation 100.0 1/263

Health 86.5 58/263

Basic Education 84.3 4/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Stuttgart, Salzburg,
Bremen, North Eastern Scotland, Darmstadt, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern,
Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Helsinki-Uusimaa, land and Prov. Antwerpen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Denmark Sjlland DK02

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.4 42/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 86 150/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 89.8 32/263 Efficiency dimension 75.7 44/263 Innovation dimension 64.7 61/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 77.1 21/263 81.7 16/263 Technological Readiness 90.9 34/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
81.9 3/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.7 18/263 Business Sophistication 43.9 73/263
Stability

Infrastructure 48.03 81/263 Market Size 26.8 149/263 Innovation 51.3 71/263

Health 77.6 166/263

Basic Education 84.3 4/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Nord Pas de Calais, Chemnitz, Basse-Normandie, Castilla y Len, Kpros, Auvergne, Malta, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire and
Nottinghamshire, Devon, Thringen, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western and Poitou-Charentes

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Denmark Syddanmark DK03

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.9 58/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 112 65/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 89.9 32/263 Efficiency dimension 73.4 59/263 Innovation dimension 58.7 91/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 79.6 13/263 83.1 14/263 Technological Readiness 89.7 58/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
81.9 3/28 Labour Market Efficiency 79.9 40/263 Business Sophistication 35.8 130/263
Stability

Infrastructure 38.99 110/263 Market Size 21.8 168/263 Innovation 46.4 91/263

Health 82.3 114/263

Basic Education 84.3 4/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Arnsberg, Midtjylland, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Oberfranken,
Weser-Ems, Veneto, Gelderland, Surrey, East and West Sussex, Mellersta Norrland, Krnten, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Prov. West-Vlaanderen and Mnster

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Denmark Midtjylland DK04

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 73.8 47/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 113 63/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 88.2 41/263 Efficiency dimension 74.3 53/263 Innovation dimension 65.3 58/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 80.3 11/263 86.1 8/263 Technological Readiness 90.5 44/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
81.9 3/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.7 58/263 Business Sophistication 36.2 128/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.91 152/263 Market Size 21.8 168/263 Innovation 62.5 40/263

Health 86.5 58/263

Basic Education 84.3 4/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Oberfranken, Arnsberg, Syddanmark, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area,
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Weser-Ems, Veneto, Gelderland, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Mellersta Norrland, Kassel, Krnten and Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Denmark Nordjylland DK05

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.5 68/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 108 79/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 85.9 51/263 Efficiency dimension 70.5 82/263 Innovation dimension 61.6 77/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 80.3 11/263 80.6 23/263 Technological Readiness 86.5 92/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
81.9 3/28 Labour Market Efficiency 79.2 42/263 Business Sophistication 38.7 112/263
Stability

Infrastructure 21.26 172/263 Market Size 17.7 193/263 Innovation 53.4 62/263

Health 83.5 89/263

Basic Education 84.3 4/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Catalua, Gieen, Mazowieckie, Liguria, Rhne-Alpes, stra Mellansverige, Limburg (NL), Mnster, Overijssel, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Toscana,
Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Lisboa, Krnten and Koblenz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Estonia Eesti EE00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.9 141/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 75 185/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 78.0 81/263 Efficiency dimension 55.9 162/263 Innovation dimension 48.1 144/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 54.2 141/263 71.9 56/263 Technological Readiness 71.7 127/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
100.0 1/28 Labour Market Efficiency 63.0 132/263 Business Sophistication 28.1 180/263
Stability

Infrastructure 6.80 237/263 Market Size 3.6 254/263 Innovation 44.1 109/263

Health 59.8 210/263

Basic Education 100.0 1/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Regin de Murcia, Dolnoslaskie, Yugozapaden, Molise, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Sardegna, Tees Valley and Durham,
Martinique, Jihozpad, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Guadeloupe, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Prov. Luxembourg (BE) and Lietuva

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Attiki EL30

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 34.4 193/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 99 101/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 12.4 240/263 Efficiency dimension 52.0 179/263 Innovation dimension 46.9 149/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 18.9 243/263 67.1 101/263 Technological Readiness 35.8 232/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 23.7 241/263 Business Sophistication 56.2 27/263
Stability

Infrastructure 27.85 145/263 Market Size 36.3 104/263 Innovation 39.4 132/263

Health 80.9 129/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Etel-Suomi, East Anglia, Aragn, La Rioja, Zeeland, Prov. Limburg (BE), Norra Mellansverige, Leipzig, Trier, Alsace, Eastern Scotland, Lnsi-Suomi,
Zahodna Slovenija, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur and North Yorkshire

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Voreio Aigaio EL41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 7.4 249/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 57 230/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 7.2 249/263 Efficiency dimension 29.8 247/263 Innovation dimension 21.3 227/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 23.2 228/263 56.9 181/263 Technological Readiness 29.0 236/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 7.0 254/263 Business Sophistication 20.9 209/263
Stability

Infrastructure 2.28 255/263 Market Size 2.8 257/263 Innovation 20.7 206/263

Health 81.0 124/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Vest, Jadranska Hrvatska, Kentriki Makedonia, Guyane, Zachodniopomorskie, Lubuskie, Kzp-Dunntl, Thessalia, Malopolskie, Peloponnisos,
Stredn Slovensko, Dytiki Ellada, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Calabria and Kontinentalna Hrvatska

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Notio Aigaio EL42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 9.0 244/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 79 173/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 6.1 253/263 Efficiency dimension 35.0 234/263 Innovation dimension 13.1 251/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 23.2 228/263 44.9 239/263 Technological Readiness 29.0 236/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 37.9 229/263 Business Sophistication 15.4 231/263
Stability

Infrastructure 0.21 258/263 Market Size 6.9 246/263 Innovation 5.7 255/263

Health 79.6 144/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Canarias, Franche-Comt, Jihovchod, Comunidad Valenciana, Prov. Hainaut, Algarve, Lincolnshire, Limousin, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Lorraine,
Galicia, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Merseyside, Picardie and Principado de Asturias

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Kriti EL43

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 6.6 250/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 62 223/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 7.4 248/263 Efficiency dimension 28.9 251/263 Innovation dimension 20.7 228/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 23.2 228/263 49.5 220/263 Technological Readiness 29.0 236/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 15.9 245/263 Business Sophistication 22.6 202/263
Stability

Infrastructure 6.40 238/263 Market Size 2.8 257/263 Innovation 17.1 229/263

Health 78.5 156/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Latvija, Ldzkie, Severozpad, Campania, Extremadura, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Calabria, Sicilia, Norte, Stredn Slovensko, Puglia, Peloponnisos,
Malopolskie, Pomorskie and Sterea Ellada

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL51

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 0.2 261/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 51 243/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 3.4 260/263 Efficiency dimension 24.0 260/263 Innovation dimension 13.8 249/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 20.6 233/263 42.9 246/263 Technological Readiness 26.1 243/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 9.3 249/263 Business Sophistication 18.5 220/263
Stability

Infrastructure 4.61 249/263 Market Size 4.7 252/263 Innovation 6.2 253/263

Health 71.1 192/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Centru, Ipeiros, Vchodn Slovensko, Swietokrzyskie, Opolskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Podlaskie, Dytiki Ellada, Sud Est, Warminsko-Mazurskie,
Thessalia, Nord Vest, Podkarpackie, Lubuskie and Zachodniopomorskie

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Kentriki Makedonia EL52

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 11.7 242/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 57 233/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 8.4 243/263 Efficiency dimension 33.9 237/263 Innovation dimension 25.6 214/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 20.6 233/263 59.7 163/263 Technological Readiness 26.1 243/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 6.1 257/263 Business Sophistication 32.9 150/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.38 203/263 Market Size 11.3 224/263 Innovation 19.9 210/263

Health 78.8 156/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Jadranska Hrvatska, Vest, Voreio Aigaio, Guyane, Zachodniopomorskie, Lubuskie, Thessalia, Dytiki Ellada, Kzp-Dunntl, Kujawsko-Pomorskie,
Malopolskie, Peloponnisos, Stredn Slovensko, Opolskie and Calabria

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Dytiki Makedonia EL53

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 6.2 252/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 69 203/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 6.6 251/263 Efficiency dimension 31.0 244/263 Innovation dimension 13.9 248/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 20.6 233/263 55.5 191/263 Technological Readiness 26.1 243/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 6.5 255/263 Business Sophistication 15.9 228/263
Stability

Infrastructure 5.50 243/263 Market Size 8.8 237/263 Innovation 9.7 250/263

Health 79.7 144/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Runion, Alentejo, West Wales and The Valleys, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Severovchod, Regio Autnoma dos
Aores, Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Basilicata, Nyugat-Dunntl, Vzhodna Slovenija, Zpadn Slovensko and Wielkopolskie

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Ipeiros EL54

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 7.6 248/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 51 242/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 5.7 254/263 Efficiency dimension 31.8 243/263 Innovation dimension 18.5 240/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 19.8 238/263 55.0 193/263 Technological Readiness 26.1 243/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 10.6 247/263 Business Sophistication 18.7 218/263
Stability

Infrastructure 3.34 252/263 Market Size 7.9 240/263 Innovation 18.5 219/263

Health 79.4 150/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Vchodn Slovensko, Centru, Opolskie, Swietokrzyskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Dytiki Ellada, Podlaskie, Sud Est,
Thessalia, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Lubuskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Nord Vest and Podkarpackie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Thessalia EL61

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 7.8 247/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 55 237/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 7.9 246/263 Efficiency dimension 30.9 246/263 Innovation dimension 19.2 238/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 20.6 233/263 58.2 171/263 Technological Readiness 21.7 248/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 1.5 262/263 Business Sophistication 30.5 164/263
Stability

Infrastructure 8.19 227/263 Market Size 9.1 235/263 Innovation 10.0 248/263

Health 81.2 124/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dytiki Ellada, Lubuskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Guyane, Opolskie, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Vest, Voreio
Aigaio, Vchodn Slovensko, Ipeiros, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Centru and Kzp-Dunntl

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Ionia Nisia EL62

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 4.9 256/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 66 212/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 8.5 243/263 Efficiency dimension 27.6 254/263 Innovation dimension 16.0 245/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 19.8 238/263 48.3 225/263 Technological Readiness 21.7 248/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 8.9 250/263 Business Sophistication 27.2 184/263
Stability

Infrastructure 2.88 253/263 Market Size 7.4 243/263 Innovation 5.6 255/263

Health 87.7 39/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Centro (PT), Vzhodna Slovenija, Nyugat-Dunntl, Stredn Morava, Andaluca, Severovchod, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, West Wales and The
Valleys, Sterea Ellada, Pomorskie, Puglia, Norte, Dytiki Makedonia, Runion and Sicilia

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Dytiki Ellada EL63

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 3.2 257/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 55 238/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 1.4 262/263 Efficiency dimension 26.7 256/263 Innovation dimension 20.5 231/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 19.8 238/263 53.4 199/263 Technological Readiness 21.7 248/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 0.0 263/263 Business Sophistication 26.8 187/263
Stability

Infrastructure 2.87 253/263 Market Size 5.4 248/263 Innovation 17.9 222/263

Health 67.5 202/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Thessalia, Opolskie, Lubuskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Guyane, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Vest, Voreio Aigaio,
Vchodn Slovensko, Ipeiros, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Centru and Kzp-Dunntl

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Sterea Ellada EL64

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 1.8 258/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 65 213/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 8.5 243/263 Efficiency dimension 25.0 259/263 Innovation dimension 11.2 252/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 19.8 238/263 45.9 236/263 Technological Readiness 21.7 248/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 2.4 261/263 Business Sophistication 20.6 212/263
Stability

Infrastructure 12.39 210/263 Market Size 9.5 233/263 Innovation 1.0 260/263

Health 80.4 135/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Pomorskie, Puglia, Norte, Sicilia, Extremadura, Campania, Ionia Nisia, Severozpad, Ldzkie, Centro (PT), Latvija, Vzhodna Slovenija, Kriti, Nyugat-
Dunntl and Stredn Morava

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Greece Peloponnisos EL65

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 2.0 258/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 59 227/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 5.8 254/263 Efficiency dimension 25.5 258/263 Innovation dimension 13.6 250/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 19.8 238/263 47.3 230/263 Technological Readiness 21.7 248/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
0.0 28/28 Labour Market Efficiency 3.7 259/263 Business Sophistication 22.0 204/263
Stability

Infrastructure 10.75 218/263 Market Size 7.8 241/263 Innovation 5.4 257/263

Health 74.0 182/263

Basic Education 26.5 25/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Malopolskie, Stredn Slovensko, Kzp-Dunntl, Calabria, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Voreio Aigaio, Vest, Kriti, Jadranska Hrvatska, Latvija, Kentriki
Makedonia, Ldzkie, Guyane, Severozpad and Campania

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Galicia ES11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 37.6 181/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 80 167/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.8 181/263 Efficiency dimension 49.2 191/263 Innovation dimension 34.7 179/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 37.5 191/263 57.3 176/263 Technological Readiness 56.5 173/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 49.2 194/263 Business Sophistication 24.4 197/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.66 200/263 Market Size 19.0 187/263 Innovation 26.9 185/263

Health 86.0 63/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lorraine, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Merseyside, Picardie, Comunidad Valenciana, Principado de Asturias, Franche-Comt, Languedoc-Roussillon,
Shropshire and Staffordshire, Lancashire, Notio Aigaio, Northern Ireland, Canarias and Jihovchod

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Principado de Asturias ES12

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 39.9 174/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 80 164/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.2 173/263 Efficiency dimension 50.7 188/263 Innovation dimension 37.9 172/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 47.8 152/263 63.0 131/263 Technological Readiness 59.6 162/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 42.6 217/263 Business Sophistication 27.0 185/263
Stability

Infrastructure 9.10 222/263 Market Size 20.7 177/263 Innovation 29.2 174/263

Health 83.5 89/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Picardie, Merseyside, Languedoc-Roussillon, Galicia, Lorraine, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Lancashire, Northern Ireland,
Comunidad Valenciana, Franche-Comt, Cantabria, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire and Notio Aigaio

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Cantabria ES13

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 44.1 164/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 83 159/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 56.1 161/263 Efficiency dimension 55.3 167/263 Innovation dimension 38.3 171/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 47.6 153/263 68.5 86/263 Technological Readiness 61.4 160/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 48.2 198/263 Business Sophistication 27.0 185/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.19 216/263 Market Size 20.5 178/263 Innovation 28.8 178/263

Health 90.4 20/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Prov. Namur, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Northern Ireland,
Lancashire, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Languedoc-Roussillon, Devon, Principado de Asturias, Picardie, Merseyside, Malta, Galicia and Lorraine

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Pas Vasco ES21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 60.2 119/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 119 51/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 57.8 153/263 Efficiency dimension 71.2 78/263 Innovation dimension 51.2 134/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 46.3 159/263 78.2 30/263 Technological Readiness 66.2 146/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.6 148/263 Business Sophistication 34.6 138/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.07 189/263 Market Size 40.8 86/263 Innovation 49.2 79/263

Health 91.3 12/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Vstsverige, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Emilia Romagna, vre Norrland, Saarland, Niederbayern, Hannover, Freiburg, Detmold, Lazio, Steiermark, Kassel,
Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Prov. West-Vlaanderen and Cheshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 51.6 148/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 112 62/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 58.2 151/263 Efficiency dimension 64.0 130/263 Innovation dimension 42.1 160/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 46.0 160/263 72.1 54/263 Technological Readiness 63.6 152/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 58.4 155/263 Business Sophistication 22.4 203/263
Stability

Infrastructure 23.14 163/263 Market Size 31.1 126/263 Innovation 42.2 118/263

Health 89.0 30/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Midtjylland, Oberfranken, Arnsberg, Syddanmark, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Surrey, East and
West Sussex, Weser-Ems, Veneto, Gelderland, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Mellersta Norrland, Kassel, Krnten and Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W W

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain La Rioja ES23

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 37.1 184/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 98 103/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 57.3 154/263 Efficiency dimension 47.9 196/263 Innovation dimension 33.5 185/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 47.2 155/263 59.2 167/263 Technological Readiness 56.7 170/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 39.5 222/263 Business Sophistication 22.7 201/263
Stability

Infrastructure 15.43 197/263 Market Size 21.1 176/263 Innovation 25.7 188/263

Health 91.1 14/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Limburg (BE), Etel-Suomi, Trier, Alsace, Attiki, Eastern Scotland, East Anglia, Aragn, Zahodna Slovenija, North Yorkshire, Zeeland,
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Midi-Pyrnes, Norra Mellansverige and Leipzig

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Aragn ES24

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 40.3 173/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 100 99/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 61.4 140/263 Efficiency dimension 48.4 194/263 Innovation dimension 39.0 169/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 44.4 166/263 61.9 145/263 Technological Readiness 58.2 168/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 38.9 226/263 Business Sophistication 25.4 195/263
Stability

Infrastructure 38.18 115/263 Market Size 19.4 184/263 Innovation 35.5 151/263

Health 88.3 36/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: East Anglia, Attiki, Etel-Suomi, Zeeland, Norra Mellansverige, Leipzig, La Rioja, Lnsi-Suomi, Prov. Limburg (BE), Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur,
Trier, Alsace, Eastern Scotland, Piemonte and Zahodna Slovenija

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Comunidad de Madrid ES30

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 67.7 83/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 125 42/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 71.0 104/263 Efficiency dimension 70.4 82/263 Innovation dimension 65.5 57/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 46.0 160/263 68.8 83/263 Technological Readiness 70.4 134/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 51.6 183/263 Business Sophistication 49.3 50/263
Stability

Infrastructure 59.23 55/263 Market Size 60.8 26/263 Innovation 65.3 28/263

Health 98.4 2/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Unterfranken, Schwaben, Cheshire, Oberpfalz, Bucuresti Ilfov, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Detmold, Freiburg, Hannover, Lombardia, Niederbayern, Emilia Romagna, Pas Vasco and Vstsverige

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Castilla y Len ES41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 36.8 187/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 85 147/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 58.1 152/263 Efficiency dimension 47.0 199/263 Innovation dimension 31.7 192/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 45.8 162/263 60.5 152/263 Technological Readiness 54.9 177/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 38.4 227/263 Business Sophistication 22.8 200/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.80 156/263 Market Size 17.8 191/263 Innovation 22.3 199/263

Health 86.9 54/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland, Auvergne, Basse-Normandie, Kpros, Malta, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire and
Nottinghamshire, Thringen, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western, Devon and Poitou-Charentes

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Castilla-La Mancha ES42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 27.6 216/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 72 194/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 60.7 143/263 Efficiency dimension 33.4 240/263 Innovation dimension 27.5 207/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 40.7 181/263 49.0 223/263 Technological Readiness 54.6 178/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 16.3 244/263 Business Sophistication 17.9 222/263
Stability

Infrastructure 38.74 112/263 Market Size 16.4 200/263 Innovation 17.6 226/263

Health 89.6 23/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lietuva, Guadeloupe, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Wielkopolskie, Zpadn Slovensko, Jihozpad, Tees Valley and Durham, Sardegna, Basilicata,
Yugozapaden, Regin de Murcia, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Eesti, Slaskie and Moravskoslezsko

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Extremadura ES43

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 21.1 230/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 63 218/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.1 174/263 Efficiency dimension 28.6 252/263 Innovation dimension 24.7 219/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 44.7 164/263 45.1 238/263 Technological Readiness 51.5 185/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 17.3 243/263 Business Sophistication 18.8 218/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.43 232/263 Market Size 7.3 244/263 Innovation 11.9 241/263

Health 87.3 39/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Campania, Severozpad, Ldzkie, Sicilia, Latvija, Kriti, Norte, Puglia, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Calabria, Stredn
Slovensko, Peloponnisos and Malopolskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Catalua ES51

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 48.7 153/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 78/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 63.8 129/263 Efficiency dimension 54.0 175/263 Innovation dimension 50.2 138/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 41.1 177/263 55.0 193/263 Technological Readiness 64.7 150/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 50.0 190/263 Business Sophistication 36.6 125/263
Stability

Infrastructure 48.71 78/263 Market Size 35.5 110/263 Innovation 45.4 100/263

Health 90.6 18/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Nordjylland, Gieen, Mazowieckie, stra Mellansverige, Limburg (NL), Liguria, Mnster, Rhne-Alpes, Overijssel, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Kzp-
Magyarorszg, Toscana, Lisboa, Krnten and Koblenz

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Comunidad Valenciana ES52

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 37.1 184/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 79 171/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 57.2 156/263 Efficiency dimension 45.7 205/263 Innovation dimension 36.8 175/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 40.1 182/263 56.0 188/263 Technological Readiness 56.3 175/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 34.1 231/263 Business Sophistication 30.1 169/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.97 152/263 Market Size 24.8 156/263 Innovation 25.7 188/263

Health 89.7 23/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lincolnshire, Franche-Comt, Limousin, Lorraine, Galicia, Merseyside, Picardie, Notio Aigaio, Principado de Asturias, Canarias, Languedoc-
Roussillon, Jihovchod, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Lancashire and Prov. Hainaut

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Illes Balears ES53

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 32.3 200/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 96 112/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 54.2 167/263 Efficiency dimension 41.1 222/263 Innovation dimension 35.9 178/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 42.8 169/263 44.5 240/263 Technological Readiness 64.1 151/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 44.8 207/263 Business Sophistication 30.6 164/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.50 201/263 Market Size 18.5 189/263 Innovation 15.8 233/263

Health 87.7 39/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Pays de la Loire, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Friesland (NL), Midi-Pyrnes, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire,
North Yorkshire, Drenthe, Zahodna Slovenija, Marche, Aquitaine, Haute-Normandie, Eastern Scotland, Alsace, Trier and Prov. Limburg (BE)

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Andaluca ES61

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 25.7 220/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 68 207/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 55.2 164/263 Efficiency dimension 31.1 244/263 Innovation dimension 33.3 187/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 41.8 174/263 46.6 234/263 Technological Readiness 56.6 172/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 13.8 246/263 Business Sophistication 27.9 180/263
Stability

Infrastructure 21.00 173/263 Market Size 15.7 204/263 Innovation 18.8 216/263

Health 86.0 63/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Severovchod, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, West Wales and The Valleys, Vzhodna Slovenija, Centro (PT),
Dytiki Makedonia, Ionia Nisia, Runion, Alentejo, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Regio Autnoma dos Aores and Basilicata

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Regin de Murcia ES62

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 30.2 210/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 75 186/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 56.5 160/263 Efficiency dimension 37.8 227/263 Innovation dimension 30.7 196/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 46.8 157/263 51.1 215/263 Technological Readiness 58.8 166/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 23.2 242/263 Business Sophistication 21.5 205/263
Stability

Infrastructure 17.51 190/263 Market Size 19.3 184/263 Innovation 17.8 224/263

Health 87.6 39/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Eesti, Yugozapaden, Dolnoslaskie, Molise, Sardegna, Tees Valley and Durham, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Jihozpad,
Martinique, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Guadeloupe, Lietuva, Castilla-La Mancha and Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta ES63

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 14.2 238/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 76 181/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 50.1 190/263 Efficiency dimension 23.3 261/263 Innovation dimension 19.8 236/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 42.2 172/263 39.2 254/263 Technological Readiness 63.3 154/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 4.9 258/263 Business Sophistication 5.6 257/263
Stability

Infrastructure 3.82 251/263 Market Size 12.3 219/263 Innovation 4.2 258/263

Health 84.0 84/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: South Yorkshire, Martinique, Molise, Dolnoslaskie, Eesti, Regin de Murcia, Yugozapaden, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Prov. Luxembourg (BE),
Sardegna, Algarve, Tees Valley and Durham, Prov. Hainaut, Jihozpad and Jihovchod

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla ES64

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 15.7 236/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 69 205/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.4 184/263 Efficiency dimension 21.4 262/263 Innovation dimension 25.6 214/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 42.2 172/263 42.7 248/263 Technological Readiness 63.1 155/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 3.7 259/263 Business Sophistication 12.4 239/263
Stability

Infrastructure 1.49 257/263 Market Size 2.7 257/263 Innovation 11.6 242/263

Health 89.5 23/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: West Wales and The Valleys, Severovchod, Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl, Dytiki Makedonia, Runion, Vzhodna Slovenija,
Alentejo, Centro (PT), Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Ionia Nisia, Regio Autnoma dos Aores and Basilicata

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Spain Canarias ES70

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 27.1 217/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 79 174/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.5 172/263 Efficiency dimension 35.9 232/263 Innovation dimension 29.9 201/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 39.5 184/263 49.7 219/263 Technological Readiness 57.2 169/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
48.5 24/28 Labour Market Efficiency 27.1 240/263 Business Sophistication 26.2 192/263
Stability

Infrastructure 12.61 209/263 Market Size 12.4 219/263 Innovation 11.5 244/263

Health 89.6 23/263

Basic Education 69.3 12/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Notio Aigaio, Jihovchod, Prov. Hainaut, Algarve, Franche-Comt, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Comunidad Valenciana,
Lincolnshire, Limousin, Lorraine, Galicia, Merseyside, Picardie and Martinique

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Finland Lnsi-Suomi FI19

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.1 72/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 102 95/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 88.6 38/263 Efficiency dimension 69.4 97/263 Innovation dimension 61.1 80/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 87.3 4/263 84.1 12/263 Technological Readiness 88.8 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
72.9 11/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.1 97/263 Business Sophistication 31.0 160/263
Stability

Infrastructure 22.24 170/263 Market Size 15.8 203/263 Innovation 59.3 50/263

Health 82.8 105/263

Basic Education 93.9 2/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Leipzig, Norra Mellansverige, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Zeeland, Piemonte, Aragn, East Anglia, Schleswig-Holstein, Attiki, Etel-Suomi, Friuli
Venezia Giulia, La Rioja, Prov. Limburg (BE), Trier and Alsace

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Finland Helsinki-Uusimaa FI1B

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 88.3 11/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 150 21/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 93.9 9/263 Efficiency dimension 82.6 14/263 Innovation dimension 84.3 9/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 86.4 5/263 93.4 3/263 Technological Readiness 96.0 7/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
72.9 11/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.9 45/263 Business Sophistication 52.7 37/263
Stability

Infrastructure 31.89 133/263 Market Size 33.8 116/263 Innovation 87.6 5/263

Health 91.6 11/263

Basic Education 93.9 2/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Southern and Eastern, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Salzburg, Amsterdam and regions
covered by its commuting zone , land, Utrecht, Prov. Antwerpen, Karlsruhe, Hovedstaden, Tirol, London and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Vorarlberg, Stuttgart and Bremen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
S

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Finland Etel-Suomi FI1C

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.6 64/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 100 102/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.4 22/263 Efficiency dimension 68.4 105/263 Innovation dimension 65.6 55/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 87.6 2/263 79.5 26/263 Technological Readiness 88.1 85/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
72.9 11/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.3 95/263 Business Sophistication 35.7 130/263
Stability

Infrastructure 33.31 126/263 Market Size 19.7 182/263 Innovation 66.2 26/263

Health 82.2 114/263

Basic Education 93.9 2/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Attiki, East Anglia, Aragn, La Rioja, Zeeland, Prov. Limburg (BE), Trier, Alsace, Norra Mellansverige, Eastern Scotland, Leipzig, Lnsi-Suomi,
Zahodna Slovenija, North Yorkshire and Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Finland Pohjois-ja It-Suomi FI1D

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.4 96/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 93 123/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 84.6 56/263 Efficiency dimension 64.6 127/263 Innovation dimension 62.9 70/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 87.6 2/263 81.3 18/263 Technological Readiness 87.3 90/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
72.9 11/28 Labour Market Efficiency 68.0 111/263 Business Sophistication 33.0 149/263
Stability

Infrastructure 12.71 208/263 Market Size 10.2 229/263 Innovation 62.9 37/263

Health 78.3 161/263

Basic Education 93.9 2/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Cumbria, Dresden, Champagne-Ardenne, Haute-Normandie, Aquitaine, Marche, Highlands and Islands, Drenthe, Greater Manchester, West
Yorkshire, Friesland (NL), East Wales, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Pays de la Loire and Illes Balears

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Finland land FI20

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.9 58/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 144 22/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.1 24/263 Efficiency dimension 73.4 59/263 Innovation dimension 57.9 99/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 100.0 1/263 89.7 6/263 Technological Readiness 88.7 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
72.9 11/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.4 81/263 Business Sophistication 25.6 194/263
Stability

Infrastructure 0.00 259/263 Market Size 17.2 196/263 Innovation 57.5 53/263

Health 94.3 4/263

Basic Education 93.9 2/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Prov. Antwerpen, Karlsruhe, Tirol, Vorarlberg, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Mittelfranken, Tbingen, Noord-Brabant, Valle
d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Dsseldorf, Braunschweig, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Southern and Eastern, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen and Berkshire,
Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
S

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France le de France FR10

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 90.3 8/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 180 5/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 84.2 58/263 Efficiency dimension 91.5 4/263 Innovation dimension 77.9 18/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 56.0 130/263 78.3 30/263 Technological Readiness 78.0 109/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.0 66/263 Business Sophistication 61.1 16/263
Stability

Infrastructure 100.00 1/263 Market Size 84.9 2/263 Innovation 76.9 10/263

Health 90.8 16/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Oberbayern, Groningen, Stockholm, Bratislavsk kraj, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Darmstadt, North Eastern Scotland,
Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Salzburg and Hamburg

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Champagne-Ardenne FR21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.5 143/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 93 120/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 66.6 119/263 Efficiency dimension 59.9 150/263 Innovation dimension 50.0 140/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 54.5 139/263 65.9 110/263 Technological Readiness 69.5 140/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.5 150/263 Business Sophistication 48.3 53/263
Stability

Infrastructure 61.94 48/263 Market Size 26.5 150/263 Innovation 26.7 186/263

Health 70.6 195/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Haute-Normandie, Aquitaine, Marche, Drenthe, Highlands and Islands, Friesland (NL), Greater
Manchester, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, West Yorkshire, East Wales, Pays de la Loire and Illes Balears

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N W

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Picardie FR22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.8 142/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 81 165/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 67.1 116/263 Efficiency dimension 62.2 139/263 Innovation dimension 44.2 154/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 54.5 139/263 57.1 178/263 Technological Readiness 70.0 137/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.9 144/263 Business Sophistication 34.4 142/263
Stability

Infrastructure 65.92 38/263 Market Size 46.1 64/263 Innovation 27.8 184/263

Health 69.0 200/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Merseyside, Galicia, Principado de Asturias, Lorraine, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Languedoc-Roussillon, Comunidad Valenciana, Shropshire and
Staffordshire, Lancashire, Franche-Comt, Northern Ireland, Notio Aigaio, Canarias and Cantabria

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Haute-Normandie FR23

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 56.6 132/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 94 119/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 62.9 134/263 Efficiency dimension 66.4 119/263 Innovation dimension 48.0 146/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.1 133/263 69.1 79/263 Technological Readiness 70.7 133/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.9 144/263 Business Sophistication 33.7 147/263
Stability

Infrastructure 42.66 99/263 Market Size 40.1 90/263 Innovation 37.7 136/263

Health 73.8 184/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Aquitaine, Marche, Champagne-Ardenne, Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Drenthe, Friesland (NL), Leicestershire, Rutland and
Northamptonshire, Highlands and Islands, Pays de la Loire, Illes Balears, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire and East Wales

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Centre FR24

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 60.9 115/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 90 129/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 67.9 112/263 Efficiency dimension 69.4 97/263 Innovation dimension 50.2 138/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 60.1 117/263 72.9 51/263 Technological Readiness 70.4 134/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 70.8 100/263 Business Sophistication 38.5 113/263
Stability

Infrastructure 56.37 63/263 Market Size 34.0 114/263 Innovation 38.2 135/263

Health 73.1 186/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Umbria, Dorset and Somerset, Corse, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT), Bourgogne, South Western Scotland, Lneburg, East Wales, Kent, Prov. Lige,
West Yorkshire, Poitou-Charentes, Greater Manchester and Border, Midland and Western

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Basse-Normandie FR25

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 54.6 138/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 86 151/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 60.1 144/263 Efficiency dimension 65.1 124/263 Innovation dimension 46.3 152/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 59.1 123/263 68.8 83/263 Technological Readiness 63.0 157/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 70.4 104/263 Business Sophistication 39.0 109/263
Stability

Infrastructure 29.51 142/263 Market Size 28.0 142/263 Innovation 34.0 155/263

Health 71.7 191/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kpros, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais, Chemnitz, Malta, Castilla y Len, Auvergne, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire and
Nottinghamshire, Devon, Thringen, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western and Poitou-Charentes

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Bourgogne FR26

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 55.5 134/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 89 128/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 68.4 111/263 Efficiency dimension 64.5 128/263 Innovation dimension 43.6 155/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 54.8 138/263 71.3 63/263 Technological Readiness 63.6 152/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 64.4 129/263 Business Sophistication 33.7 147/263
Stability

Infrastructure 65.30 41/263 Market Size 28.0 142/263 Innovation 32.6 165/263

Health 73.0 186/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Centre, Umbria, Dorset and Somerset, Corse, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT), South Western Scotland, East Wales, West Yorkshire, Lneburg, Greater
Manchester, Kent, Prov. Lige, Poitou-Charentes and Highlands and Islands

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Nord Pas de Calais FR30

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 54.8 136/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 86 149/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 66.0 120/263 Efficiency dimension 63.1 136/263 Innovation dimension 46.8 150/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 53.2 144/263 68.3 87/263 Technological Readiness 68.2 143/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 51.3 184/263 Business Sophistication 36.3 128/263
Stability

Infrastructure 64.75 44/263 Market Size 40.5 89/263 Innovation 33.7 158/263

Health 68.1 201/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sjlland, Chemnitz, Basse-Normandie, Castilla y Len, Kpros, Auvergne, Malta, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire and
Nottinghamshire, Devon, Thringen, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western and Poitou-Charentes

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Lorraine FR41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 57.3 130/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 80 168/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 65.6 123/263 Efficiency dimension 65.0 125/263 Innovation dimension 51.0 135/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.5 132/263 67.6 93/263 Technological Readiness 71.3 129/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 65.8 123/263 Business Sophistication 41.5 88/263
Stability

Infrastructure 49.41 77/263 Market Size 33.7 118/263 Innovation 35.8 147/263

Health 76.0 174/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Galicia, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Merseyside, Picardie, Comunidad Valenciana, Principado de Asturias, Franche-Comt, Languedoc-Roussillon,
Shropshire and Staffordshire, Lancashire, Notio Aigaio, Northern Ireland, Canarias and Jihovchod

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Alsace FR42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 63.8 105/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 98 106/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 74.5 94/263 Efficiency dimension 69.7 93/263 Innovation dimension 54.2 119/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 57.7 126/263 74.1 45/263 Technological Readiness 71.9 124/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 59.2 152/263 Business Sophistication 37.4 120/263
Stability

Infrastructure 67.57 34/263 Market Size 44.0 75/263 Innovation 48.5 81/263

Health 85.7 72/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Eastern Scotland, Trier, Prov. Limburg (BE), Zahodna Slovenija, La Rioja, North Yorkshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Midi-
Pyrnes, Etel-Suomi, Attiki, East Anglia, Aragn, Illes Balears, Pays de la Loire and Zeeland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Franche-Comt FR43

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 57.5 126/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 79 172/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 64.1 128/263 Efficiency dimension 64.8 126/263 Innovation dimension 53.4 123/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 57.2 129/263 70.4 71/263 Technological Readiness 71.5 128/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 64.1 130/263 Business Sophistication 39.4 105/263
Stability

Infrastructure 48.33 79/263 Market Size 30.7 127/263 Innovation 44.5 106/263

Health 71.1 192/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Comunidad Valenciana, Notio Aigaio, Lincolnshire, Limousin, Lorraine, Canarias, Galicia, Merseyside, Picardie, Jihovchod, Principado de Asturias,
Prov. Hainaut, Algarve, Prov. Luxembourg (BE) and Languedoc-Roussillon

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Pays de la Loire FR51

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 61.0 115/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 96 113/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 65.2 127/263 Efficiency dimension 70.5 82/263 Innovation dimension 50.5 137/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 57.9 125/263 75.7 40/263 Technological Readiness 73.4 117/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.1 97/263 Business Sophistication 37.7 118/263
Stability

Infrastructure 42.62 99/263 Market Size 31.7 125/263 Innovation 37.3 141/263

Health 77.6 166/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Illes Balears, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Friesland (NL), Midi-Pyrnes, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire,
Drenthe, North Yorkshire, Zahodna Slovenija, Marche, Aquitaine, Haute-Normandie, Eastern Scotland, Alsace, Trier and Champagne-Ardenne

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Bretagne FR52

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 63.7 105/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 90 133/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 59.9 145/263 Efficiency dimension 73.8 57/263 Innovation dimension 56.4 112/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 62.2 116/263 80.9 21/263 Technological Readiness 67.8 145/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.8 63/263 Business Sophistication 42.1 84/263
Stability

Infrastructure 27.13 146/263 Market Size 29.2 134/263 Innovation 52.3 65/263

Health 70.1 196/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Corse, Burgenland (AT), Dorset and Somerset, Umbria, Centre, Bourgogne, South Western Scotland, Lneburg, Kent, Prov. Lige, East Wales,
Poitou-Charentes, Border, Midland and Western, Abruzzo and West Yorkshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Poitou-Charentes FR53

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 51.6 148/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 88 139/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 61.4 140/263 Efficiency dimension 60.5 147/263 Innovation dimension 46.4 152/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 59.6 120/263 64.8 117/263 Technological Readiness 69.9 139/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.5 137/263 Business Sophistication 38.9 110/263
Stability

Infrastructure 32.71 130/263 Market Size 27.9 142/263 Innovation 28.0 181/263

Health 72.5 189/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Border, Midland and Western, Abruzzo, Prov. Lige, Kent, Thringen, Lneburg, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, West Midlands, Sachsen-Anhalt,
Auvergne, South Western Scotland, Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais and Sjlland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Aquitaine FR61

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 58.2 124/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 94 118/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 63.3 132/263 Efficiency dimension 65.9 120/263 Innovation dimension 53.5 121/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 60.1 117/263 71.9 56/263 Technological Readiness 72.2 122/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 67.9 111/263 Business Sophistication 40.4 97/263
Stability

Infrastructure 31.30 136/263 Market Size 28.0 142/263 Innovation 42.9 115/263

Health 78.6 156/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Marche, Haute-Normandie, Drenthe, Champagne-Ardenne, Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Friesland (NL), Leicestershire, Rutland and
Northamptonshire, Pays de la Loire, Illes Balears, Highlands and Islands, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire and Midi-Pyrnes

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Midi-Pyrnes FR62

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 66.9 87/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 97 111/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 63.3 132/263 Efficiency dimension 73.4 59/263 Innovation dimension 63.2 69/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 59.6 120/263 84.7 11/263 Technological Readiness 72.1 122/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 70.7 100/263 Business Sophistication 41.9 85/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.30 157/263 Market Size 28.0 142/263 Innovation 66.7 25/263

Health 83.7 89/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, North Yorkshire, Zahodna Slovenija, Illes Balears, Pays de la Loire, Eastern Scotland, Alsace,
Trier, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Prov. Limburg (BE), Friesland (NL), La Rioja, Drenthe, Marche and Aquitaine

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Limousin FR63

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.1 145/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 80 169/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 58.9 148/263 Efficiency dimension 63.4 133/263 Innovation dimension 46.7 150/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 57.6 126/263 70.0 74/263 Technological Readiness 66.1 148/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 67.4 116/263 Business Sophistication 39.3 105/263
Stability

Infrastructure 22.77 168/263 Market Size 24.1 158/263 Innovation 31.8 166/263

Health 74.8 179/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lincolnshire, Lorraine, Galicia, Merseyside, Picardie, Comunidad Valenciana, Principado de Asturias, Franche-Comt, Languedoc-Roussillon,
Shropshire and Staffordshire, Notio Aigaio, Lancashire, Northern Ireland, Canarias and Jihovchod

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Rhne-Alpes FR71

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.5 68/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 108 82/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 71.4 102/263 Efficiency dimension 74.9 50/263 Innovation dimension 62.2 73/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 58.5 124/263 79.6 26/263 Technological Readiness 73.4 117/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.5 94/263 Business Sophistication 40.8 95/263
Stability

Infrastructure 54.50 68/263 Market Size 38.3 93/263 Innovation 64.1 32/263

Health 85.9 63/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Liguria, Overijssel, Mazowieckie, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Toscana, Lisboa, Nordjylland, Catalua, Koblenz, Gieen, Berlin and regions covered by its
commuting zone , Smland med arna, Sydsverige, stra Mellansverige and Limburg (NL)

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Auvergne FR72

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 57.4 129/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 86 146/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 58.7 150/263 Efficiency dimension 66.8 115/263 Innovation dimension 53.1 125/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 59.3 122/263 70.2 72/263 Technological Readiness 66.0 149/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.3 87/263 Business Sophistication 45.4 68/263
Stability

Infrastructure 22.97 164/263 Market Size 28.3 139/263 Innovation 41.5 121/263

Health 72.4 189/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Basse-Normandie,
Kpros, Thringen, Malta, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western, Poitou-Charentes and Prov. Lige

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Languedoc-Roussillon FR81

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 54.2 140/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 82 163/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 62.5 135/263 Efficiency dimension 61.5 141/263 Innovation dimension 51.7 132/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 55.6 131/263 67.9 88/263 Technological Readiness 71.0 130/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.2 138/263 Business Sophistication 38.0 114/263
Stability

Infrastructure 40.30 108/263 Market Size 26.5 150/263 Innovation 42.1 118/263

Health 74.0 182/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Shropshire and Staffordshire, Lancashire, Principado de Asturias, Northern Ireland, Picardie, Merseyside, Galicia, Lorraine, Limousin, Lincolnshire,
Cantabria, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Comunidad Valenciana, Franche-Comt and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur FR82

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 60.7 117/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 103 94/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 63.4 131/263 Efficiency dimension 67.5 111/263 Innovation dimension 57.3 104/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 52.2 146/263 70.9 67/263 Technological Readiness 71.0 130/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 68.0 111/263 Business Sophistication 41.6 87/263
Stability

Infrastructure 40.48 107/263 Market Size 34.1 114/263 Innovation 52.4 65/263

Health 79.8 144/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Piemonte, Lnsi-Suomi, Leipzig, Norra Mellansverige, Schleswig-Holstein, Zeeland, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Aragn, East Anglia, Attiki, Etel-Suomi,
Sydsverige, Smland med arna, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone and Koblenz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Corse FR83

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 37.4 183/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 90 132/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.0 174/263 Efficiency dimension 47.6 197/263 Innovation dimension 37.7 173/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 53.5 142/263 55.6 190/263 Technological Readiness 54.2 179/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 49.4 191/263 Business Sophistication 35.7 130/263
Stability

Infrastructure 4.79 247/263 Market Size 16.6 197/263 Innovation 23.3 195/263

Health 75.5 176/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dorset and Somerset, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT), Umbria, Centre, Bourgogne, South Western Scotland, Lneburg, Kent, Prov. Lige, East Wales,
Poitou-Charentes, West Yorkshire, Border, Midland and Western and Abruzzo

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Guadeloupe FRA1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 26.8 218/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 73 192/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 27.0 231/263 Efficiency dimension 44.3 210/263 Innovation dimension 34.0 183/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 47.1 155/263 NA/263 Technological Readiness 54.3 179/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 30.4 236/263 Business Sophistication 28.1 180/263
Stability

Infrastructure NA/263 Market Size 30.8 127/263 Innovation 22.4 197/263

Health 0.0 263/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Lietuva, Castilla-La Mancha, Jihozpad, Tees Valley and Durham, Sardegna, Wielkopolskie, Zpadn Slovensko,
Yugozapaden, Regin de Murcia, Eesti, Basilicata, Dolnoslaskie, Molise and Regio Autnoma dos Aores

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Martinique FRA2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 39.7 175/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 75 180/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 55.2 164/263 Efficiency dimension 51.0 184/263 Innovation dimension 34.4 181/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 50.4 148/263 NA/263 Technological Readiness 47.0 191/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 44.2 211/263 Business Sophistication 37.0 122/263
Stability

Infrastructure NA/263 Market Size 30.8 127/263 Innovation 19.4 211/263

Health 61.1 209/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, South Yorkshire, Molise, Dolnoslaskie, Eesti, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Regin de Murcia, Prov. Luxembourg (BE),
Yugozapaden, Algarve, Prov. Hainaut, Sardegna, Jihovchod, Tees Valley and Durham and Jihozpad

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Guyane FRA3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 0.0 262/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 58 234/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 43.4 212/263 Efficiency dimension 0.0 263/263 Innovation dimension 33.9 183/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 44.7 164/263 0.0 261/263 Technological Readiness 54.3 179/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 8.6 251/263 Business Sophistication 29.2 171/263
Stability

Infrastructure NA/263 Market Size 0.0 263/263 Innovation 20.9 205/263

Health 39.8 242/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Zachodniopomorskie, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Lubuskie, Vest, Voreio Aigaio, Thessalia, Dytiki Ellada, Kujawsko-Pomorskie,
Opolskie, Kzp-Dunntl, Malopolskie, Peloponnisos, Stredn Slovensko and Calabria

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning W S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


France Runion FRA4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 26.5 219/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 70 202/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.8 181/263 Efficiency dimension 34.4 236/263 Innovation dimension 31.4 193/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 50.5 148/263 34.4 259/263 Technological Readiness 50.5 187/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
61.0 18/28 Labour Market Efficiency 28.2 237/263 Business Sophistication 29.6 170/263
Stability

Infrastructure NA/263 Market Size 29.9 131/263 Innovation 17.4 227/263

Health 53.1 222/263

Basic Education 61.8 17/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dytiki Makedonia, Alentejo, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, West Wales and The Valleys, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla,
Basilicata, Severovchod, Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl, Zpadn Slovensko, Wielkopolskie and Vzhodna Slovenija

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Croatia Jadranska Hrvatska HR03

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 25.3 222/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 57 232/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 27.2 228/263 Efficiency dimension 43.3 215/263 Innovation dimension 30.7 196/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 23.1 231/263 59.9 161/263 Technological Readiness 46.2 193/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.0 22/28 Labour Market Efficiency 41.4 218/263 Business Sophistication 28.7 178/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.76 230/263 Market Size 5.2 249/263 Innovation 20.4 207/263

Health 54.7 218/263

Basic Education 47.4 21/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kentriki Makedonia, Vest, Voreio Aigaio, Guyane, Zachodniopomorskie, Lubuskie, Thessalia, Dytiki Ellada, Kzp-Dunntl, Malopolskie, Kujawsko-
Pomorskie, Peloponnisos, Stredn Slovensko, Opolskie and Calabria

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Croatia Kontinentalna Hrvatska HR04

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 25.6 220/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 60 224/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 27.3 228/263 Efficiency dimension 43.4 213/263 Innovation dimension 31.4 193/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 24.7 226/263 59.5 165/263 Technological Readiness 39.7 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.0 22/28 Labour Market Efficiency 34.2 231/263 Business Sophistication 32.6 151/263
Stability

Infrastructure 15.93 194/263 Market Size 12.9 216/263 Innovation 23.3 195/263

Health 47.4 231/263

Basic Education 47.4 21/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Calabria, Stredn Slovensko, Peloponnisos, Malopolskie, Kzp-Dunntl, Kriti, Latvija, Ldzkie, Severozpad, Campania, Extremadura, Voreio
Aigaio, Vest, Jadranska Hrvatska and Sicilia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary Kzp-Magyarorszg HU10

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 49.1 152/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 84/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 34.4 223/263 Efficiency dimension 60.9 145/263 Innovation dimension 56.6 110/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 28.2 217/263 65.1 114/263 Technological Readiness 56.8 170/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.7 136/263 Business Sophistication 44.4 71/263
Stability

Infrastructure 31.10 138/263 Market Size 28.4 138/263 Innovation 60.1 46/263

Health 51.5 226/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Toscana, Overijssel, Lisboa, Rhne-Alpes, Liguria, Koblenz, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Smland med arna, Mazowieckie,
Sydsverige, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen, stra Mellansverige and Limburg (NL)

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary Kzp-Dunntl HU21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 30.9 205/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 59 229/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 29.8 226/263 Efficiency dimension 51.1 184/263 Innovation dimension 27.6 207/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 32.2 206/263 51.4 212/263 Technological Readiness 52.6 183/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 63.0 132/263 Business Sophistication 12.7 237/263
Stability

Infrastructure 30.35 140/263 Market Size 20.3 180/263 Innovation 25.9 188/263

Health 34.9 249/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Malopolskie, Peloponnisos, Stredn Slovensko, Calabria, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Voreio Aigaio, Vest, Jadranska Hrvatska, Kentriki Makedonia,
Kriti, Latvija, Guyane, Ldzkie, Zachodniopomorskie and Severozpad

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary Nyugat-Dunntl HU22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 30.6 207/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 68 209/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 31.9 224/263 Efficiency dimension 49.6 190/263 Innovation dimension 28.1 206/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 32.2 206/263 51.7 208/263 Technological Readiness 52.5 184/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.3 138/263 Business Sophistication 15.9 228/263
Stability

Infrastructure 31.44 135/263 Market Size 16.1 202/263 Innovation 23.5 194/263

Health 40.0 240/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Stredn Morava, Andaluca, Severovchod, Vzhodna Slovenija, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, West Wales and The Valleys, Centro (PT), Ionia Nisia,
Dytiki Makedonia, Runion, Alentejo, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Regio Autnoma dos Aores and Basilicata

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary Dl-Dunntl HU23

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 22.9 227/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 44 253/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 24.3 234/263 Efficiency dimension 43.3 215/263 Innovation dimension 24.9 218/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 32.2 206/263 49.3 221/263 Technological Readiness 47.0 191/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 54.6 175/263 Business Sophistication 16.8 226/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.59 213/263 Market Size 8.8 237/263 Innovation 18.8 216/263

Health 33.2 252/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dl-Alfld, Sud Muntenia, Lubelskie, szak-Alfld, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie, szak-Magyarorszg, Sud
Vest Oltenia, Swietokrzyskie, Yugoiztochen, Severoiztochen and Centru

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W S S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary szak-Magyarorszg HU31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 20.1 231/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 40 256/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 23.1 236/263 Efficiency dimension 40.8 223/263 Innovation dimension 21.9 225/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.0 214/263 44.0 242/263 Technological Readiness 40.9 209/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 50.8 186/263 Business Sophistication 12.3 239/263
Stability

Infrastructure 19.87 179/263 Market Size 12.9 216/263 Innovation 21.8 200/263

Health 25.6 262/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sud Vest Oltenia, Yugoiztochen, szak-Alfld, Sud Muntenia, Severoiztochen, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Nord Est (RO), Lubelskie, Podkarpackie,
Nord Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie and Severen tsentralen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary szak-Alfld HU32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 19.8 232/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 42 255/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 25.7 233/263 Efficiency dimension 39.7 224/263 Innovation dimension 19.7 237/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.0 214/263 47.7 227/263 Technological Readiness 40.5 211/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 44.9 207/263 Business Sophistication 10.4 246/263
Stability

Infrastructure 22.90 164/263 Market Size 9.8 232/263 Innovation 18.6 218/263

Health 31.0 256/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sud Muntenia, szak-Magyarorszg, Sud Vest Oltenia, Dl-Dunntl, Yugoiztochen, Dl-Alfld, Severoiztochen, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord
Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie, Swietokrzyskie and Nord Est (RO)

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Hungary Dl-Alfld HU33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 24.3 224/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 46 252/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 24.2 235/263 Efficiency dimension 46.1 202/263 Innovation dimension 22.2 223/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.0 214/263 53.3 200/263 Technological Readiness 41.6 202/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
56.8 19/28 Labour Market Efficiency 54.9 172/263 Business Sophistication 12.6 237/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.19 188/263 Market Size 10.5 225/263 Innovation 21.5 204/263

Health 30.1 258/263

Basic Education 44.0 22/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dl-Dunntl, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie, Swietokrzyskie, Sud Muntenia, szak-Alfld, szak-
Magyarorszg, Sud Vest Oltenia, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki and Ipeiros

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Ireland Border, Midland and Western IE01

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 48.1 155/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 87 140/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 65.5 123/263 Efficiency dimension 51.9 181/263 Innovation dimension 51.7 132/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.5 97/263 66.1 107/263 Technological Readiness 84.8 97/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
41.5 25/28 Labour Market Efficiency 48.0 199/263 Business Sophistication 26.8 187/263
Stability

Infrastructure 16.98 193/263 Market Size 14.7 209/263 Innovation 43.1 114/263

Health 82.9 105/263

Basic Education 86.9 3/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Abruzzo, Poitou-Charentes, Thringen, Prov. Lige, Kent, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, West Midlands, Sachsen-Anhalt, Lneburg, Auvergne,
Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland and South Western Scotland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Ireland Southern and Eastern IE02

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 63.3 109/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 149 20/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 66.7 118/263 Efficiency dimension 63.3 134/263 Innovation dimension 69.2 37/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 64.9 111/263 74.2 45/263 Technological Readiness 91.9 30/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
41.5 25/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.0 140/263 Business Sophistication 46.0 63/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.75 183/263 Market Size 22.4 166/263 Innovation 59.7 48/263

Health 86.4 58/263

Basic Education 86.9 3/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Salzburg, Amsterdam and regions covered
by its commuting zone , Utrecht, land, Hovedstaden, Prov. Antwerpen, Karlsruhe, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Tirol, Vorarlberg,
Stuttgart and Bremen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Piemonte ITC1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 45.1 163/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 103 93/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.9 168/263 Efficiency dimension 55.3 167/263 Innovation dimension 43.5 155/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 25.7 225/263 49.4 221/263 Technological Readiness 38.7 226/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 52.6 178/263 Business Sophistication 42.9 82/263
Stability

Infrastructure 47.70 82/263 Market Size 45.3 67/263 Innovation 43.8 110/263

Health 85.2 76/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Schleswig-Holstein, Lnsi-Suomi, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Leipzig, Norra Mellansverige, Zeeland, Aragn, East Anglia,
Sydsverige, Smland med arna, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Attiki, Etel-Suomi and Koblenz

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste ITC2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 38.9 177/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 134 31/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 52.9 174/263 Efficiency dimension 52.7 178/263 Innovation dimension 33.0 188/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 39.4 186/263 44.1 242/263 Technological Readiness 38.6 226/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 64.8 128/263 Business Sophistication 31.1 160/263
Stability

Infrastructure 31.22 136/263 Market Size 34.3 113/263 Innovation 30.3 173/263

Health 81.6 121/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Dsseldorf, Mittelfranken, Braunschweig, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Obersterreich, Zuid-
Holland, Kln, Vorarlberg, Tirol, Lombardia, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen and land

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Liguria ITC3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 43.6 167/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 81/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 52.0 180/263 Efficiency dimension 54.3 173/263 Innovation dimension 42.6 158/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 23.7 227/263 51.7 208/263 Technological Readiness 38.0 228/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 54.5 175/263 Business Sophistication 43.1 80/263
Stability

Infrastructure 38.65 112/263 Market Size 37.2 97/263 Innovation 41.6 121/263

Health 88.5 32/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Rhne-Alpes, Overijssel, Mazowieckie, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Toscana, Nordjylland, Lisboa, Catalua, Gieen, Koblenz, Berlin and regions covered
by its commuting zone , Smland med arna, Sydsverige, stra Mellansverige and Limburg (NL)

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Lombardia ITC4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.5 143/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 131 37/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 57.0 158/263 Efficiency dimension 64.1 130/263 Innovation dimension 47.4 148/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 26.9 223/263 51.1 215/263 Technological Readiness 42.8 200/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.9 144/263 Business Sophistication 46.8 59/263
Stability

Infrastructure 53.62 69/263 Market Size 60.4 27/263 Innovation 45.7 97/263

Health 88.6 32/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kln, Bucuresti Ilfov, Oberpfalz, Zuid-Holland, Obersterreich, Unterfranken, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Braunschweig, Dsseldorf,
Comunidad de Madrid, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Mittelfranken and Schwaben

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Abruzzo ITF1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 32.7 198/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 87 141/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 46.7 207/263 Efficiency dimension 46.1 202/263 Innovation dimension 30.2 199/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 21.1 232/263 54.5 195/263 Technological Readiness 36.3 231/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 34.1 231/263 Business Sophistication 28.7 178/263
Stability

Infrastructure 24.13 161/263 Market Size 28.3 139/263 Innovation 28.1 181/263

Health 86.7 57/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Border, Midland and Western, Poitou-Charentes, Thringen, Prov. Lige, Kent, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, West Midlands, Sachsen-Anhalt,
Lneburg, Auvergne, Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland and South Western Scotland

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N W

Health
S

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Molise ITF2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 30.4 209/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 75 183/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 43.2 215/263 Efficiency dimension 46.0 202/263 Innovation dimension 25.7 214/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 15.2 251/263 52.1 207/263 Technological Readiness 32.9 233/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 40.9 219/263 Business Sophistication 26.8 187/263
Stability

Infrastructure 22.98 164/263 Market Size 25.1 155/263 Innovation 21.6 200/263

Health 83.4 89/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dolnoslaskie, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Eesti, Martinique, Regin de Murcia, Yugozapaden, Sardegna, Tees Valley and
Durham, Jihozpad, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Algarve, Prov. Hainaut and Regio Autnoma da Madeira

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Campania ITF3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 21.3 228/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 63 219/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 43.5 212/263 Efficiency dimension 32.0 242/263 Innovation dimension 27.3 209/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 9.1 260/263 41.7 251/263 Technological Readiness 29.6 235/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 7.9 252/263 Business Sophistication 30.8 163/263
Stability

Infrastructure 31.69 134/263 Market Size 30.9 127/263 Innovation 24.0 193/263

Health 83.6 89/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Extremadura, Severozpad, Ldzkie, Latvija, Sicilia, Kriti, Norte, Puglia, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Calabria, Stredn
Slovensko, Peloponnisos and Malopolskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Puglia ITF4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 18.9 233/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 64 215/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 44.4 211/263 Efficiency dimension 29.3 249/263 Innovation dimension 24.3 222/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 15.8 249/263 42.9 246/263 Technological Readiness 29.9 234/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 7.9 252/263 Business Sophistication 29.3 171/263
Stability

Infrastructure 21.58 171/263 Market Size 21.4 175/263 Innovation 17.4 227/263

Health 87.3 39/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Norte, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Sicilia, Extremadura, Campania, Severozpad, Ldzkie, Latvija, Ionia Nisia, Kriti, Centro (PT), Vzhodna Slovenija,
Nyugat-Dunntl and Stredn Morava

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Basilicata ITF5

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 23.7 226/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 71 197/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 42.0 216/263 Efficiency dimension 38.2 226/263 Innovation dimension 20.8 228/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 17.6 245/263 49.9 217/263 Technological Readiness 28.6 240/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 28.3 237/263 Business Sophistication 21.4 207/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.53 201/263 Market Size 17.6 193/263 Innovation 19.0 215/263

Health 84.6 79/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Slaskie, Moravskoslezsko, Alentejo, Zpadn Slovensko, Wielkopolskie, Runion, Dytiki Makedonia, Castilla-La
Mancha, Lietuva, West Wales and The Valleys, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Guadeloupe, Regio Autnoma da Madeira and Severovchod

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Calabria ITF6

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 16.3 235/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 61 225/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 41.5 217/263 Efficiency dimension 28.3 253/263 Innovation dimension 20.1 232/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 15.0 252/263 46.0 236/263 Technological Readiness 26.8 241/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 6.5 255/263 Business Sophistication 26.1 192/263
Stability

Infrastructure 15.86 194/263 Market Size 15.0 208/263 Innovation 13.1 239/263

Health 84.0 84/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Stredn Slovensko, Peloponnisos, Malopolskie, Kzp-Dunntl, Kriti, Latvija, Ldzkie, Severozpad, Campania,
Extremadura, Voreio Aigaio, Vest, Jadranska Hrvatska and Sicilia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Sicilia ITG1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 15.3 237/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 64 217/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 40.8 220/263 Efficiency dimension 26.6 256/263 Innovation dimension 21.8 226/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 16.0 248/263 37.2 256/263 Technological Readiness 26.9 241/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 10.3 248/263 Business Sophistication 26.9 187/263
Stability

Infrastructure 12.83 207/263 Market Size 19.9 181/263 Innovation 16.5 230/263

Health 83.3 89/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Norte, Puglia, Extremadura, Campania, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Severozpad, Ldzkie, Latvija, Kriti, Ionia Nisia, Centro (PT), Kontinentalna
Hrvatska, Calabria and Vzhodna Slovenija

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Sardegna ITG2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 21.3 228/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 74 188/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 39.8 221/263 Efficiency dimension 33.8 237/263 Innovation dimension 26.3 213/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 18.9 243/263 40.5 253/263 Technological Readiness 40.4 212/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 32.2 235/263 Business Sophistication 28.0 180/263
Stability

Infrastructure 8.54 225/263 Market Size 15.5 206/263 Innovation 14.9 236/263

Health 80.9 129/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Tees Valley and Durham, Jihozpad, Yugozapaden, Regin de Murcia, Eesti, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Guadeloupe, Dolnoslaskie, Molise,
Lietuva, Castilla-La Mancha, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Martinique and Wielkopolskie

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 45.6 160/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 150 19/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 54.5 166/263 Efficiency dimension 61.3 142/263 Innovation dimension 33.5 185/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 43.0 168/263 51.3 212/263 Technological Readiness 45.6 194/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.1 52/263 Business Sophistication 26.8 187/263
Stability

Infrastructure 26.45 150/263 Market Size 35.9 106/263 Innovation 30.8 172/263

Health 86.0 63/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Salzburg, Amsterdam and regions covered by its
commuting zone , Utrecht, land, Hovedstaden, Prov. Antwerpen, Karlsruhe, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Tirol, Vorarlberg, Stuttgart
and Bremen

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 48.6 153/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 127 41/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 57.4 154/263 Efficiency dimension 60.5 147/263 Innovation dimension 41.4 163/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 43.4 167/263 56.8 181/263 Technological Readiness 45.1 195/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 61.6 142/263 Business Sophistication 36.4 127/263
Stability

Infrastructure 35.29 121/263 Market Size 40.7 86/263 Innovation 40.2 128/263

Health 87.5 39/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Unterfranken, Comunidad de Madrid, Schwaben, Oberpfalz, Bucuresti Ilfov, Cheshire, Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Lombardia, Detmold, Freiburg, Hannover, Niederbayern, Kln, Emilia Romagna and Zuid-Holland

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Veneto ITH3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 43.3 169/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 111 69/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 55.7 163/263 Efficiency dimension 56.4 159/263 Innovation dimension 36.2 177/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.6 209/263 52.5 202/263 Technological Readiness 41.0 208/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 51.1 185/263 Business Sophistication 34.2 143/263
Stability

Infrastructure 46.60 87/263 Market Size 45.2 67/263 Innovation 32.9 163/263

Health 86.5 58/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Weser-Ems, Gelderland, Mellersta Norrland, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Krnten, Prov. Oost-
Vlaanderen, Syddanmark, Mnster, Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Arnsberg, Midtjylland, Comunidad Foral de Navarra and Gieen

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Friuli Venezia Giulia ITH4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 45.3 162/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 104 91/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 52.6 178/263 Efficiency dimension 56.1 160/263 Innovation dimension 43.5 155/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.5 199/263 54.0 196/263 Technological Readiness 44.4 196/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 57.5 158/263 Business Sophistication 39.7 103/263
Stability

Infrastructure 32.47 131/263 Market Size 36.0 106/263 Innovation 42.4 117/263

Health 82.4 111/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Schleswig-Holstein, Piemonte, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Sydsverige, Smland med arna, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Koblenz, Lnsi-Suomi, Lisboa, Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Leipzig, Overijssel, Norra Mellansverige and Rhne-Alpes

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Emilia Romagna ITH5

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 47.0 157/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 120 50/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 56.2 161/263 Efficiency dimension 58.4 154/263 Innovation dimension 41.7 161/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.3 210/263 51.5 211/263 Technological Readiness 43.5 197/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 56.3 162/263 Business Sophistication 35.5 134/263
Stability

Infrastructure 52.52 73/263 Market Size 47.6 59/263 Innovation 43.4 112/263

Health 83.7 89/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Pas Vasco, Vstsverige, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Niederbayern, Hannover, Freiburg, Detmold, vre Norrland, Saarland, Lazio, Steiermark, Praha and
regions covered by its commuting zone , Kassel, Cheshire and Prov. West-Vlaanderen

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Toscana ITI1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 41.3 172/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 85/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.9 168/263 Efficiency dimension 52.1 179/263 Innovation dimension 39.3 168/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 27.0 221/263 49.8 217/263 Technological Readiness 40.6 210/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 50.8 186/263 Business Sophistication 38.9 110/263
Stability

Infrastructure 41.43 104/263 Market Size 36.9 98/263 Innovation 35.6 149/263

Health 88.7 31/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kzp-Magyarorszg, Lisboa, Overijssel, Rhne-Alpes, Liguria, Koblenz, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Smland med arna,
Sydsverige, Mazowieckie, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen, stra Mellansverige and Limburg (NL)

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Umbria ITI2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 39.7 175/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 89 130/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 50.5 189/263 Efficiency dimension 53.4 177/263 Innovation dimension 32.9 188/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 27.4 219/263 57.5 175/263 Technological Readiness 39.5 222/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 47.2 202/263 Business Sophistication 32.3 154/263
Stability

Infrastructure 29.28 143/263 Market Size 32.5 121/263 Innovation 27.9 183/263

Health 87.5 39/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Centre, Dorset and Somerset, Corse, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT), Bourgogne, South Western Scotland, Lneburg, East Wales, Kent, Prov. Lige,
West Yorkshire, Poitou-Charentes, Greater Manchester and Border, Midland and Western

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
S

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Marche ITI3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 38.1 180/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 94 117/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 49.9 192/263 Efficiency dimension 51.4 183/263 Innovation dimension 34.1 182/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 27.0 221/263 53.6 197/263 Technological Readiness 41.1 203/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 48.0 199/263 Business Sophistication 30.4 164/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.26 157/263 Market Size 31.8 124/263 Innovation 31.7 168/263

Health 89.4 29/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Aquitaine, Haute-Normandie, Drenthe, Champagne-Ardenne, Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Friesland (NL), Leicestershire, Rutland and
Northamptonshire, Pays de la Loire, Illes Balears, Highlands and Islands, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire and Midi-Pyrnes

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
S

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Italy Lazio ITI4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 47.7 156/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 119 56/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 52.5 178/263 Efficiency dimension 56.7 158/263 Innovation dimension 48.5 143/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 16.8 247/263 55.8 189/263 Technological Readiness 40.2 213/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
52.5 21/28 Labour Market Efficiency 48.7 196/263 Business Sophistication 50.7 44/263
Stability

Infrastructure 55.60 65/263 Market Size 43.3 77/263 Innovation 46.0 94/263

Health 83.9 84/263

Basic Education 58.8 18/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Steiermark, Kassel, Saarland, vre Norrland, Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Vstsverige, Pas Vasco, Surrey, East and West Sussex,
Emilia Romagna, Niederbayern, Hannover, Freiburg, Detmold and Oberfranken

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability W W N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Lithuania Lietuva LT00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 34.2 194/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 72 193/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 28.1 227/263 Efficiency dimension 55.4 167/263 Innovation dimension 30.5 198/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 37.5 191/263 69.0 79/263 Technological Readiness 55.9 176/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
66.4 14/28 Labour Market Efficiency 57.4 158/263 Business Sophistication 11.5 243/263
Stability

Infrastructure 8.14 227/263 Market Size 11.7 222/263 Innovation 31.7 168/263

Health 27.2 259/263

Basic Education 47.5 20/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Castilla-La Mancha, Guadeloupe, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Jihozpad, Wielkopolskie, Zpadn Slovensko, Tees Valley and Durham,
Sardegna, Yugozapaden, Regin de Murcia, Basilicata, Eesti, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Dolnoslaskie and Slaskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Luxembourg Luxembourg LU00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 91.1 7/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 269 1/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 76.8 83/263 Efficiency dimension 82.5 14/263 Innovation dimension 100.0 1/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 76.8 22/263 79.1 28/263 Technological Readiness 100.0 1/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
81.1 4/28 Labour Market Efficiency 100.0 1/263 Business Sophistication 100.0 1/263
Stability

Infrastructure 47.07 85/263 Market Size 35.3 111/263 Innovation 68.3 24/263

Health 81.9 120/263

Basic Education 48.8 19/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Hamburg, Bratislavsk kraj, Groningen, le de France, Oberbayern, Stockholm, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Darmstadt,
North Eastern Scotland, Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht and Amsterdam and regions covered by
its commuting zone

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S S

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Latvia Latvija LV00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 35.1 191/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 61 222/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 41.5 217/263 Efficiency dimension 48.7 193/263 Innovation dimension 37.2 174/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.7 197/263 64.0 123/263 Technological Readiness 51.4 186/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
77.1 7/28 Labour Market Efficiency 54.7 173/263 Business Sophistication 32.4 151/263
Stability

Infrastructure 8.22 227/263 Market Size 2.2 260/263 Innovation 28.4 180/263

Health 33.6 251/263

Basic Education 66.5 13/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kriti, Ldzkie, Severozpad, Campania, Extremadura, Sicilia, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Calabria, Norte, Puglia, Stredn Slovensko, Peloponnisos,
Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada and Malopolskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S S S

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W S

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


#N/A Malta MT00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 36.7 187/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 86 153/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 47.3 201/263 Efficiency dimension 43.5 213/263 Innovation dimension 49.8 141/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 52.5 145/263 46.9 231/263 Technological Readiness 68.8 142/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
68.3 13/28 Labour Market Efficiency 57.2 160/263 Business Sophistication 40.4 97/263
Stability

Infrastructure 6.33 238/263 Market Size 10.5 225/263 Innovation 36.1 146/263

Health 87.0 54/263

Basic Education 29.2 24/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kpros, Basse-Normandie, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais, Chemnitz, Castilla y Len, Devon, Auvergne, Sachsen-Anhalt, West Midlands, Derbyshire
and Nottinghamshire, Thringen, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Prov. Namur and Abruzzo

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone NL00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 87.3 12/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 155 16/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 91.3 22/263 Efficiency dimension 83.4 11/263 Innovation dimension 81.7 12/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 74.9 29/263 80.8 21/263 Technological Readiness 94.1 17/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.2 66/263 Business Sophistication 69.0 6/263
Stability

Infrastructure 65.86 38/263 Market Size 57.6 32/263 Innovation 62.8 37/263

Health 85.9 63/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Salzburg, Utrecht, Hovedstaden, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia
Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Stuttgart, Bremen, North Eastern Scotland, Darmstadt, Bruxelles and regions covered by
its commuting zone , land and Prov. Antwerpen

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Groningen NL11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 71.5 57/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 181 4/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 79.0 78/263 Efficiency dimension 74.4 53/263 Innovation dimension 63.9 63/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 76.9 22/263 77.6 33/263 Technological Readiness 94.1 17/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 80.4 36/263 Business Sophistication 36.6 125/263
Stability

Infrastructure 33.83 124/263 Market Size 32.4 122/263 Innovation 55.1 59/263

Health 72.9 188/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: le de France, Oberbayern, Bratislavsk kraj, Stockholm, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Darmstadt, North Eastern Scotland,
Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Hamburg, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting
zone and Salzburg

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W W

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Friesland (NL) NL12

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 67.8 83/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 95 115/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 84.3 57/263 Efficiency dimension 68.4 105/263 Innovation dimension 62.2 73/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 77.2 19/263 70.2 72/263 Technological Readiness 93.2 21/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.7 85/263 Business Sophistication 51.3 42/263
Stability

Infrastructure 44.16 93/263 Market Size 32.2 123/263 Innovation 33.9 155/263

Health 80.0 136/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Drenthe, Pays de la Loire, Illes Balears, Marche, Aquitaine, Haute-Normandie, Midi-Pyrnes,
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Champagne-Ardenne, Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, North Yorkshire and Zahodna Slovenija

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Drenthe NL13

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.4 68/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 94 116/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 86.6 47/263 Efficiency dimension 70.1 89/263 Innovation dimension 61.7 77/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 74.9 29/263 69.1 79/263 Technological Readiness 91.8 30/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.1 66/263 Business Sophistication 50.4 45/263
Stability

Infrastructure 57.00 61/263 Market Size 36.7 101/263 Innovation 34.8 152/263

Health 79.2 151/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Marche, Aquitaine, Friesland (NL), Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Haute-Normandie, Champagne-Ardenne, Pays de la Loire,
Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Illes Balears, Midi-Pyrnes, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, North Yorkshire and Highlands and
Islands

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Overijssel NL21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 76.7 36/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 83/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 93.6 13/263 Efficiency dimension 75.2 48/263 Innovation dimension 67.9 44/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 79.5 14/263 74.4 44/263 Technological Readiness 96.0 7/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 75.9 70/263 Business Sophistication 49.4 49/263
Stability

Infrastructure 72.84 22/263 Market Size 43.7 76/263 Innovation 48.5 81/263

Health 82.9 105/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kzp-Magyarorszg, Toscana, Rhne-Alpes, Liguria, Lisboa, Mazowieckie, Koblenz, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Smland
med arna, Sydsverige, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen, stra Mellansverige and Limburg (NL)

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Gelderland NL22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 82.4 21/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 110 70/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 92.8 14/263 Efficiency dimension 80.9 22/263 Innovation dimension 72.9 26/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 76.1 25/263 74.2 45/263 Technological Readiness 95.1 11/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.9 55/263 Business Sophistication 55.7 28/263
Stability

Infrastructure 74.32 19/263 Market Size 58.6 28/263 Innovation 55.0 59/263

Health 82.8 105/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Veneto, Weser-Ems, Mellersta Norrland, Krnten, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Prov. Oost-
Vlaanderen, Mnster, Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Syddanmark, Arnsberg, Gieen, Catalua and Nordjylland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Utrecht NL31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 97.6 2/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 156 15/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 100.0 1/263 Efficiency dimension 93.1 2/263 Innovation dimension 86.0 6/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 77.3 19/263 85.9 9/263 Technological Readiness 97.0 6/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 84.7 12/263 Business Sophistication 69.2 5/263
Stability

Infrastructure 91.08 4/263 Market Size 70.1 7/263 Innovation 71.3 18/263

Health 89.6 23/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Hovedstaden, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Salzburg, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Stuttgart,
Bremen, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, North Eastern Scotland, Darmstadt,
Helsinki-Uusimaa, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , land and Prov. Antwerpen

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Zuid-Holland NL33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 84.8 18/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 133 35/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 95.5 5/263 Efficiency dimension 81.3 20/263 Innovation dimension 76.9 19/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 76.6 24/263 76.0 39/263 Technological Readiness 93.7 20/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 68.2 110/263 Business Sophistication 60.0 19/263
Stability

Infrastructure 76.54 15/263 Market Size 66.2 15/263 Innovation 61.6 41/263

Health 88.2 37/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Obersterreich, Kln, Braunschweig, Dsseldorf, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Noord-Brabant, Tbingen, Lombardia, Mittelfranken, Wien and
regions covered by its commuting zone , Bucuresti Ilfov, Oberpfalz, Vorarlberg, Tirol and Unterfranken

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Zeeland NL34

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 69.1 72/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 101 98/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 86.7 46/263 Efficiency dimension 71.9 69/263 Innovation dimension 57.0 105/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 75.5 27/263 62.7 137/263 Technological Readiness 95.7 9/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.6 76/263 Business Sophistication 40.4 97/263
Stability

Infrastructure 45.15 92/263 Market Size 53.0 48/263 Innovation 31.1 171/263

Health 87.8 39/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Norra Mellansverige, Leipzig, Aragn, East Anglia, Lnsi-Suomi, Attiki, Etel-Suomi, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Piemonte, La Rioja, Schleswig-
Holstein, Prov. Limburg (BE), Trier, Alsace and Eastern Scotland

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Noord-Brabant NL41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 85.1 16/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 135 30/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 96.2 2/263 Efficiency dimension 80.5 23/263 Innovation dimension 78.9 17/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 75.3 28/263 72.5 53/263 Technological Readiness 93.0 22/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.6 76/263 Business Sophistication 56.4 24/263
Stability

Infrastructure 84.47 5/263 Market Size 63.2 21/263 Innovation 71.8 15/263

Health 85.6 72/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Tbingen, Valle d'Aosta/Valle d'Aoste, Mittelfranken, Dsseldorf, Wien and regions covered by its commuting zone , Braunschweig,
Obersterreich, Zuid-Holland, Kln, Vorarlberg, Tirol, Lombardia, Karlsruhe, Prov. Antwerpen and land

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Netherlands Limburg (NL) NL42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 79.0 30/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 108 75/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 94.5 7/263 Efficiency dimension 77.8 34/263 Innovation dimension 68.2 42/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 76.0 26/263 69.5 76/263 Technological Readiness 93.9 19/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
75.6 9/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.4 87/263 Business Sophistication 49.0 52/263
Stability

Infrastructure 81.34 8/263 Market Size 61.0 25/263 Innovation 51.7 69/263

Health 82.5 111/263

Basic Education 76.7 8/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: stra Mellansverige, Mnster, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Gieen, Catalua, Nordjylland, Krnten, Mellersta Norrland, Mazowieckie, Liguria, Rhne-
Alpes, Gelderland, Overijssel, Kzp-Magyarorszg and Veneto

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Ldzkie PL11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 37.5 181/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 62 221/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 46.9 205/263 Efficiency dimension 54.2 174/263 Innovation dimension 24.6 221/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.9 195/263 59.3 166/263 Technological Readiness 41.3 203/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 56.3 162/263 Business Sophistication 14.3 234/263
Stability

Infrastructure 20.07 175/263 Market Size 23.6 162/263 Innovation 26.1 187/263

Health 39.8 242/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Severozpad, Campania, Extremadura, Latvija, Kriti, Sicilia, Norte, Puglia, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Calabria, Stredn
Slovensko, Peloponnisos and Malopolskie

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Mazowieckie PL12

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 50.5 150/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 108 80/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.2 186/263 Efficiency dimension 65.2 122/263 Innovation dimension 40.4 164/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.4 199/263 71.5 59/263 Technological Readiness 41.3 203/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 65.4 126/263 Business Sophistication 31.0 160/263
Stability

Infrastructure 26.22 151/263 Market Size 29.1 134/263 Innovation 47.3 85/263

Health 47.9 230/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Liguria, Nordjylland, Rhne-Alpes, Catalua, Gieen, Overijssel, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Toscana, Lisboa, stra Mellansverige, Limburg (NL),
Mnster, Koblenz, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone and Smland med arna

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Malopolskie PL21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 42.4 171/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 60 228/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 53.6 170/263 Efficiency dimension 57.3 155/263 Innovation dimension 26.7 211/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 39.3 186/263 66.2 107/263 Technological Readiness 38.1 228/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 52.2 179/263 Business Sophistication 16.5 227/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.82 183/263 Market Size 26.3 153/263 Innovation 31.8 166/263

Health 57.6 215/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Peloponnisos, Kzp-Dunntl, Stredn Slovensko, Calabria, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Voreio Aigaio, Vest, Jadranska Hrvatska, Kentriki
Makedonia, Kriti, Latvija, Guyane, Ldzkie, Severozpad and Campania

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Slaskie PL22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 43.2 170/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 70 199/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.3 185/263 Efficiency dimension 60.2 149/263 Innovation dimension 24.7 219/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 35.2 203/263 62.6 137/263 Technological Readiness 38.1 228/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 55.6 168/263 Business Sophistication 14.7 233/263
Stability

Infrastructure 22.40 169/263 Market Size 36.9 98/263 Innovation 28.8 178/263

Health 52.2 224/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Moravskoslezsko, Alentejo, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Basilicata, Runion, Dytiki Makedonia, Zpadn Slovensko, Wielkopolskie, West Wales
and The Valleys, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Severovchod, Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl and Castilla-La Mancha

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Lubelskie PL31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 33.5 197/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 47 251/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 45.5 208/263 Efficiency dimension 49.8 189/263 Innovation dimension 18.8 239/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 38.0 190/263 63.7 124/263 Technological Readiness 39.8 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 48.0 199/263 Business Sophistication 9.4 249/263
Stability

Infrastructure 8.89 224/263 Market Size 12.1 221/263 Innovation 18.1 220/263

Health 43.3 237/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Podkarpackie, Nord Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Dl-Alfld, Podlaskie, Swietokrzyskie, Dl-Dunntl, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia,
Thraki, Sud Muntenia, Ipeiros, szak-Alfld, Vchodn Slovensko and szak-Magyarorszg

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Podkarpackie PL32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 31.2 204/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 47 250/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 48.5 197/263 Efficiency dimension 45.6 205/263 Innovation dimension 17.4 242/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 36.7 197/263 60.3 156/263 Technological Readiness 39.8 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 39.8 221/263 Business Sophistication 6.7 254/263
Stability

Infrastructure 8.42 226/263 Market Size 12.8 216/263 Innovation 17.7 224/263

Health 53.2 220/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Nord Vest, Lubelskie, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie, Dl-Alfld, Swietokrzyskie, Dl-Dunntl, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki,
Ipeiros, Vchodn Slovensko, Sud Muntenia, szak-Alfld and szak-Magyarorszg

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Swietokrzyskie PL33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 34.2 194/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 49 245/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 47.1 202/263 Efficiency dimension 51.1 184/263 Innovation dimension 14.8 246/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 37.5 191/263 63.2 131/263 Technological Readiness 39.8 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 47.0 203/263 Business Sophistication 6.6 254/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.73 212/263 Market Size 17.8 191/263 Innovation 10.9 246/263

Health 46.0 234/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Podlaskie, Sud Est, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Nord Vest, Podkarpackie, Centru, Lubelskie, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Ipeiros, Vchodn Slovensko,
Dl-Alfld, Dl-Dunntl, Opolskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie and Dytiki Ellada

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Podlaskie PL34

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 29.7 211/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 48 246/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 48.6 196/263 Efficiency dimension 43.3 215/263 Innovation dimension 17.7 241/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 41.1 177/263 52.3 206/263 Technological Readiness 39.8 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 50.3 189/263 Business Sophistication 8.3 252/263
Stability

Infrastructure 5.24 244/263 Market Size 8.3 239/263 Innovation 16.4 230/263

Health 51.7 225/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sud Est, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Swietokrzyskie, Nord Vest, Podkarpackie, Lubelskie, Dl-Alfld, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Ipeiros,
Vchodn Slovensko, Dl-Dunntl, Opolskie, Sud Muntenia and szak-Alfld

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Wielkopolskie PL41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 35.3 190/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 72 195/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 50.6 188/263 Efficiency dimension 51.0 184/263 Innovation dimension 20.2 232/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 38.1 188/263 61.2 149/263 Technological Readiness 39.5 222/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 46.8 206/263 Business Sophistication 9.7 248/263
Stability

Infrastructure 20.16 175/263 Market Size 20.6 178/263 Innovation 21.7 200/263

Health 49.1 229/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Zpadn Slovensko, Basilicata, Castilla-La Mancha, Lietuva, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Guadeloupe, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Slaskie,
Moravskoslezsko, Alentejo, Runion, Jihozpad, Dytiki Makedonia, Tees Valley and Durham and Sardegna

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Zachodniopomorskie PL42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 32.7 198/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 56 235/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 48.0 198/263 Efficiency dimension 48.2 195/263 Innovation dimension 20.9 228/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 39.5 184/263 57.3 176/263 Technological Readiness 39.5 222/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 52.1 180/263 Business Sophistication 13.3 235/263
Stability

Infrastructure 15.67 196/263 Market Size 13.2 215/263 Innovation 19.2 214/263

Health 43.7 236/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lubuskie, Guyane, Thessalia, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Dytiki Ellada, Vest, Voreio Aigaio, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Opolskie, Kzp-
Dunntl, Malopolskie, Peloponnisos, Stredn Slovensko and Vchodn Slovensko

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Lubuskie PL43

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 31.6 202/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 56 236/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 47.7 199/263 Efficiency dimension 47.0 199/263 Innovation dimension 20.3 232/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 40.8 179/263 55.3 192/263 Technological Readiness 39.5 222/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 50.9 186/263 Business Sophistication 9.3 251/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.86 183/263 Market Size 14.1 211/263 Innovation 22.4 197/263

Health 39.4 244/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Zachodniopomorskie, Thessalia, Guyane, Dytiki Ellada, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Vest, Voreio Aigaio,
Opolskie, Kzp-Dunntl, Malopolskie, Peloponnisos, Stredn Slovensko and Vchodn Slovensko

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Dolnoslaskie PL51

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 38.8 177/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 75 184/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 46.8 205/263 Efficiency dimension 54.7 171/263 Innovation dimension 30.1 200/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 35.2 203/263 60.9 151/263 Technological Readiness 41.2 203/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 55.7 168/263 Business Sophistication 18.2 221/263
Stability

Infrastructure 17.35 191/263 Market Size 23.3 164/263 Innovation 35.9 147/263

Health 43.3 237/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Molise, Eesti, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Regin de Murcia, Martinique, Yugozapaden, Sardegna, Tees Valley and Durham,
Jihozpad, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Algarve, Prov. Hainaut and Regio Autnoma da Madeira

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Opolskie PL52

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 31.0 205/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 54 240/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.0 187/263 Efficiency dimension 44.8 209/263 Innovation dimension 20.3 232/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 42.8 169/263 46.9 231/263 Technological Readiness 41.2 203/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 49.3 191/263 Business Sophistication 11.7 242/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.44 186/263 Market Size 21.6 172/263 Innovation 17.9 222/263

Health 47.0 233/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Dytiki Ellada, Thessalia, Lubuskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Vchodn Slovensko, Guyane, Ipeiros, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki,
Centru, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Vest, Voreio Aigaio and Swietokrzyskie

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Kujawsko-Pomorskie PL61

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 29.7 211/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 55 239/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 47.5 200/263 Efficiency dimension 45.7 205/263 Innovation dimension 16.6 244/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 42.4 171/263 58.3 171/263 Technological Readiness 39.7 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 39.2 225/263 Business Sophistication 7.5 253/263
Stability

Infrastructure 14.24 199/263 Market Size 16.6 197/263 Innovation 14.6 237/263

Health 40.7 239/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dytiki Ellada, Opolskie, Thessalia, Lubuskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Guyane, Kentriki Makedonia, Jadranska Hrvatska, Vest, Vchodn Slovensko,
Voreio Aigaio, Ipeiros, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Centru and Kzp-Dunntl

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Warminsko-Mazurskie PL62

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 29.4 215/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 48 248/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 47.2 202/263 Efficiency dimension 43.8 212/263 Innovation dimension 16.9 243/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 40.0 182/263 53.6 197/263 Technological Readiness 39.7 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 48.7 196/263 Business Sophistication 9.5 249/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.40 232/263 Market Size 9.1 235/263 Innovation 13.2 239/263

Health 47.1 232/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sud Est, Podlaskie, Nord Vest, Podkarpackie, Lubelskie, Swietokrzyskie, Dl-Alfld, Dl-Dunntl, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Ipeiros,
Vchodn Slovensko, Sud Muntenia, szak-Alfld and Opolskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Poland Pomorskie PL63

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 38.7 179/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 65 214/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 50.2 190/263 Efficiency dimension 53.6 176/263 Innovation dimension 26.7 211/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 40.8 179/263 63.1 131/263 Technological Readiness 39.7 214/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
63.3 16/28 Labour Market Efficiency 56.4 162/263 Business Sophistication 15.8 228/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.26 203/263 Market Size 16.4 200/263 Innovation 31.3 170/263

Health 50.5 228/263

Basic Education 80.2 6/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sterea Ellada, Puglia, Norte, Sicilia, Extremadura, Campania, Severozpad, Ionia Nisia, Ldzkie, Centro (PT), Latvija, Kriti, Vzhodna Slovenija,
Nyugat-Dunntl and Stredn Morava

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Norte PT11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 31.3 203/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 64 216/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 49.9 192/263 Efficiency dimension 42.5 218/263 Innovation dimension 29.7 202/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 45.8 162/263 47.5 228/263 Technological Readiness 48.9 189/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 43.1 214/263 Business Sophistication 23.3 199/263
Stability

Infrastructure 17.36 191/263 Market Size 19.7 182/263 Innovation 21.9 200/263

Health 79.8 144/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Puglia, Pomorskie, Sterea Ellada, Sicilia, Extremadura, Campania, Severozpad, Ldzkie, Latvija, Kriti, Ionia Nisia, Centro (PT), Vzhodna Slovenija,
Nyugat-Dunntl and Stredn Morava

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Algarve PT15

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 31.9 201/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 77 177/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 45.3 209/263 Efficiency dimension 45.0 208/263 Innovation dimension 31.4 193/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 50.7 147/263 48.0 226/263 Technological Readiness 52.8 182/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 56.8 161/263 Business Sophistication 29.3 171/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.94 211/263 Market Size 13.6 213/263 Innovation 15.7 234/263

Health 65.9 205/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Hainaut, Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Jihovchod, Canarias, Notio Aigaio, Martinique, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta,
South Yorkshire, Franche-Comt, Molise, Dolnoslaskie, Comunidad Valenciana, Eesti and Regin de Murcia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Centro (PT) PT16

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 35.1 191/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 66 211/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 49.1 195/263 Efficiency dimension 49.1 192/263 Innovation dimension 27.1 210/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 47.6 153/263 52.5 202/263 Technological Readiness 47.2 190/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 57.9 157/263 Business Sophistication 20.8 209/263
Stability

Infrastructure 20.07 175/263 Market Size 17.6 193/263 Innovation 19.5 211/263

Health 73.6 185/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Ionia Nisia, Vzhodna Slovenija, Nyugat-Dunntl, Stredn Morava, Andaluca, Severovchod, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, West Wales and The
Valleys, Sterea Ellada, Pomorskie, Dytiki Makedonia, Puglia, Norte, Runion and Sicilia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Lisboa PT17

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 54.5 139/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 106 86/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 51.6 183/263 Efficiency dimension 62.0 140/263 Innovation dimension 58.6 91/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 46.5 158/263 58.1 173/263 Technological Readiness 63.2 155/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 61.9 140/263 Business Sophistication 56.7 23/263
Stability

Infrastructure 26.93 148/263 Market Size 42.9 80/263 Innovation 44.7 105/263

Health 76.7 172/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Koblenz, Overijssel, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Smland med arna, Sydsverige, Rhne-
Alpes, Liguria, Mazowieckie, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen, stra Mellansverige and Limburg (NL)

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N S

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Alentejo PT18

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 29.7 211/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 69 201/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 47.1 202/263 Efficiency dimension 44.0 211/263 Innovation dimension 22.2 223/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 57.6 126/263 46.9 231/263 Technological Readiness 43.5 197/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 55.1 171/263 Business Sophistication 17.2 225/263
Stability

Infrastructure 19.76 180/263 Market Size 14.0 212/263 Innovation 14.5 238/263

Health 58.6 212/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Runion, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Dytiki Makedonia, Basilicata, West Wales and The Valleys, Ciudad Autnoma de
Melilla, Zpadn Slovensko, Wielkopolskie, Severovchod, Andaluca, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl and Vzhodna Slovenija

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Regio Autnoma dos Aores PT20

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 16.7 234/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 71 198/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 41.5 217/263 Efficiency dimension 27.1 255/263 Innovation dimension 25.4 217/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 53.5 142/263 29.2 260/263 Technological Readiness 59.0 165/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 40.4 220/263 Business Sophistication 12.0 241/263
Stability

Infrastructure 2.31 255/263 Market Size 5.3 249/263 Innovation 15.1 235/263

Health 59.5 211/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Basilicata, Slaskie, Moravskoslezsko, Alentejo, Runion, Dytiki Makedonia, Zpadn Slovensko, Wielkopolskie, West Wales and The Valleys, Ciudad
Autnoma de Melilla, Castilla-La Mancha, Severovchod, Lietuva, Andaluca and Stredn Morava

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Portugal Regio Autnoma da Madeira PT30

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 25.2 223/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 72 191/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 43.6 212/263 Efficiency dimension 36.6 229/263 Innovation dimension 29.5 203/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 48.3 150/263 41.9 250/263 Technological Readiness 56.4 173/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
37.9 26/28 Labour Market Efficiency 44.4 209/263 Business Sophistication 20.4 214/263
Stability

Infrastructure 4.38 250/263 Market Size 9.9 230/263 Innovation 18.1 220/263

Health 69.1 199/263

Basic Education 70.8 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Guadeloupe, Lietuva, Castilla-La Mancha, Jihozpad, Tees Valley and Durham, Sardegna, Wielkopolskie, Zpadn Slovensko, Yugozapaden,
Regin de Murcia, Eesti, Dolnoslaskie, Basilicata, Molise and South Yorkshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Nord Vest RO11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 11.9 241/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 47 249/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 4.4 256/263 Efficiency dimension 41.7 220/263 Innovation dimension 8.7 254/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 14.2 254/263 43.0 245/263 Technological Readiness 25.3 247/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 60.8 144/263 Business Sophistication 5.4 259/263
Stability

Infrastructure 5.79 241/263 Market Size 7.8 241/263 Innovation 9.4 251/263

Health 35.1 248/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Podkarpackie, Lubelskie, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie, Dl-Alfld, Swietokrzyskie, Dl-Dunntl, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki,
Ipeiros, Vchodn Slovensko, Sud Muntenia, szak-Alfld and Opolskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Centru RO12

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 8.2 246/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 51 244/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 6.9 250/263 Efficiency dimension 36.1 231/263 Innovation dimension 6.8 256/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 20.1 237/263 41.4 252/263 Technological Readiness 18.8 254/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 44.4 209/263 Business Sophistication 5.6 257/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.25 232/263 Market Size 9.3 234/263 Innovation 10.0 248/263

Health 35.3 247/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Ipeiros, Vchodn Slovensko, Swietokrzyskie, Opolskie, Podlaskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Sud Est, Dytiki Ellada,
Warminsko-Mazurskie, Thessalia, Nord Vest, Podkarpackie, Lubelskie and Lubuskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Nord Est (RO) RO21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 6.4 251/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 34 260/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 3.2 261/263 Efficiency dimension 36.6 229/263 Innovation dimension 1.5 262/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 13.8 255/263 38.6 255/263 Technological Readiness 14.7 258/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 54.8 173/263 Business Sophistication 5.4 259/263
Stability

Infrastructure 5.63 242/263 Market Size 5.0 251/263 Innovation 0.1 262/263

Health 32.1 255/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Severen tsentralen, Yuzhen tsentralen, Severoiztochen, Yugoiztochen, Severozapaden, Sud Vest Oltenia, szak-Magyarorszg, szak-Alfld, Sud
Muntenia, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest and Warminsko-Mazurskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Sud Est RO22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 0.1 262/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 48 247/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 0.0 263/263 Efficiency dimension 29.2 250/263 Innovation dimension 1.8 261/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 11.0 258/263 36.5 257/263 Technological Readiness 16.5 256/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 33.0 234/263 Business Sophistication 4.8 261/263
Stability

Infrastructure 5.18 244/263 Market Size 7.3 244/263 Innovation 0.0 262/263

Health 25.9 260/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Podlaskie, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Nord Vest, Podkarpackie, Swietokrzyskie, Lubelskie, Dl-Alfld, Centru, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Ipeiros, Dl-
Dunntl, Vchodn Slovensko, Sud Muntenia, Opolskie and szak-Alfld

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension *


W W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Sud Muntenia RO31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 5.7 254/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 42 254/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 6.3 252/263 Efficiency dimension 33.9 237/263 Innovation dimension 2.4 260/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 15.8 249/263 36.3 258/263 Technological Readiness 15.4 257/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 39.4 222/263 Business Sophistication 3.8 262/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.30 203/263 Market Size 15.2 207/263 Innovation 3.7 259/263

Health 33.3 252/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: szak-Alfld, szak-Magyarorszg, Sud Vest Oltenia, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Yugoiztochen, Severoiztochen, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, Nord Vest,
Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie, Swietokrzyskie and Nord Est (RO)

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension *


N W Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning W W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency * Business Sophistication
Stability N W W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S W

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Bucuresti Ilfov RO32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 45.4 161/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 128 38/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 13.7 238/263 Efficiency dimension 67.3 112/263 Innovation dimension 42.3 159/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 8.0 261/263 63.1 131/263 Technological Readiness 42.0 201/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 68.9 107/263 Business Sophistication 35.4 135/263
Stability

Infrastructure 20.20 175/263 Market Size 44.1 73/263 Innovation 46.6 89/263

Health 56.5 216/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Oberpfalz, Unterfranken, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Lombardia, Comunidad de Madrid, Schwaben, Cheshire, Kln, Praha and regions covered
by its commuting zone , Zuid-Holland, Obersterreich, Braunschweig, Dsseldorf, Detmold and Freiburg

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N W

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Sud Vest Oltenia RO41

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 5.6 255/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 40 257/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 1
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 4.0 258/263 Efficiency dimension 35.5 233/263 Innovation dimension 0.0 263/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 13.8 255/263 42.6 248/263 Technological Readiness 16.8 255/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 43.7 213/263 Business Sophistication 0.0 263/263
Stability

Infrastructure 4.80 247/263 Market Size 6.3 247/263 Innovation 0.8 261/263

Health 34.8 250/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: szak-Magyarorszg, Yugoiztochen, szak-Alfld, Sud Muntenia, Severoiztochen, Dl-Dunntl, Dl-Alfld, Nord Est (RO), Lubelskie,
Podkarpackie, Nord Vest, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Sud Est, Podlaskie and Severen tsentralen

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N W

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Romania Vest RO42

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 13.2 240/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 57 231/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 4.3 257/263 Efficiency dimension 41.5 221/263 Innovation dimension 14.5 247/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 14.6 253/263 46.2 235/263 Technological Readiness 29.0 236/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
65.9 15/28 Labour Market Efficiency 51.9 181/263 Business Sophistication 6.2 256/263
Stability

Infrastructure 7.30 232/263 Market Size 10.6 225/263 Innovation 20.4 207/263

Health 33.3 252/263

Basic Education 1.7 26/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Voreio Aigaio, Jadranska Hrvatska, Kentriki Makedonia, Guyane, Zachodniopomorskie, Lubuskie, Thessalia, Kzp-Dunntl, Malopolskie,
Peloponnisos, Dytiki Ellada, Stredn Slovensko, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Calabria and Kontinentalna Hrvatska

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S W

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden Stockholm SE11

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 97.2 4/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 177 7/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 92.2 17/263 Efficiency dimension 91.5 4/263 Innovation dimension 91.6 3/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 81.1 6/263 95.4 2/263 Technological Readiness 92.8 27/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 91.5 3/263 Business Sophistication 60.9 17/263
Stability

Infrastructure 44.11 93/263 Market Size 45.0 69/263 Innovation 99.8 2/263

Health 100.0 1/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Oberbayern, le de France, Groningen, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Bratislavsk kraj, Darmstadt, North Eastern Scotland,
Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Salzburg and Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden stra Mellansverige SE12

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 79.0 30/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 109 76/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 94.4 7/263 Efficiency dimension 76.9 40/263 Innovation dimension 70.5 32/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 81.1 6/263 87.3 7/263 Technological Readiness 91.4 33/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 82.1 29/263 Business Sophistication 35.2 136/263
Stability

Infrastructure 63.30 47/263 Market Size 23.4 163/263 Innovation 76.6 11/263

Health 91.9 9/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Limburg (NL), Mnster, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Gieen, Catalua, Nordjylland, Krnten, Mellersta Norrland, Mazowieckie, Liguria, Rhne-Alpes,
Gelderland, Overijssel, Kzp-Magyarorszg and Veneto

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden Smland med arna SE21

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 68.3 79/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 106 89/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 89.0 37/263 Efficiency dimension 71.9 69/263 Innovation dimension 53.2 125/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 80.9 8/263 81.6 17/263 Technological Readiness 86.8 91/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 83.1 20/263 Business Sophistication 24.5 197/263
Stability

Infrastructure 41.54 102/263 Market Size 16.7 197/263 Innovation 48.3 83/263

Health 92.9 7/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Sydsverige, Koblenz, Lisboa, Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Overijssel, Rhne-Alpes, Liguria,
Mazowieckie, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Nordjylland, Catalua, Gieen and Schleswig-Holstein

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S S W

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden Sydsverige SE22

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 81.1 24/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 107 90/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 93.9 9/263 Efficiency dimension 77.4 36/263 Innovation dimension 75.8 23/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 80.9 8/263 89.8 4/263 Technological Readiness 88.4 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 75.1 74/263 Business Sophistication 44.7 70/263
Stability

Infrastructure 58.89 57/263 Market Size 27.9 142/263 Innovation 81.6 6/263

Health 94.0 6/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Smland med arna, Berlin and regions covered by its commuting zone , Koblenz, Lisboa, Toscana, Kzp-Magyarorszg, Overijssel, Rhne-Alpes,
Liguria, Mazowieckie, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Nordjylland, Catalua, Schleswig-Holstein and Gieen

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden Vstsverige SE23

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 79.7 27/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 120 52/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 90.5 27/263 Efficiency dimension 79.7 26/263 Innovation dimension 69.2 37/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 80.9 8/263 89.8 4/263 Technological Readiness 93.0 22/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 86.2 7/263 Business Sophistication 37.4 120/263
Stability

Infrastructure 43.30 96/263 Market Size 24.2 157/263 Innovation 69.0 22/263

Health 96.0 3/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Pas Vasco, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Emilia Romagna, vre Norrland, Saarland, Niederbayern, Hannover, Freiburg, Detmold, Lazio, Steiermark, Kassel,
Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Prov. West-Vlaanderen and Cheshire

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N N

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden Norra Mellansverige SE31

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 62.6 111/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 102 97/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 86.0 51/263 Efficiency dimension 66.6 117/263 Innovation dimension 49.5 142/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 79.5 14/263 76.6 37/263 Technological Readiness 83.6 99/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.2 52/263 Business Sophistication 20.9 209/263
Stability

Infrastructure 36.33 118/263 Market Size 13.4 214/263 Innovation 45.5 100/263

Health 89.6 23/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Leipzig, Zeeland, Lnsi-Suomi, Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Aragn, East Anglia, Piemonte, Attiki, Etel-Suomi, Schleswig-Holstein, La Rioja, Friuli
Venezia Giulia, Prov. Limburg (BE), Trier and Alsace

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N W

Infrastructure Market Size * Innovation


N W N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden Mellersta Norrland SE32

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 66.0 92/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 110 71/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 82.7 65/263 Efficiency dimension 69.8 93/263 Innovation dimension 55.0 115/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 79.5 14/263 81.1 19/263 Technological Readiness 88.6 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 84.0 16/263 Business Sophistication 29.1 174/263
Stability

Infrastructure 23.01 164/263 Market Size 10.6 225/263 Innovation 45.7 97/263

Health 90.2 20/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Krnten, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Gelderland, Veneto, Mnster, Weser-Ems, Limburg (NL), stra Mellansverige, Gieen, Catalua, Gloucestershire,
Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Nordjylland, Mazowieckie and Liguria

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Sweden vre Norrland SE33

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 67.9 82/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 118 54/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 80.1 73/263 Efficiency dimension 70.1 89/263 Innovation dimension 62.0 76/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 79.5 14/263 83.9 13/263 Technological Readiness 92.6 28/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
85.8 2/28 Labour Market Efficiency 80.9 34/263 Business Sophistication 29.1 174/263
Stability

Infrastructure 11.59 213/263 Market Size 10.0 230/263 Innovation 60.5 45/263

Health 91.4 12/263

Basic Education 65.6 14/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Saarland, Rheinhessen-Pfalz, Vstsverige, Pas Vasco, Lazio, Steiermark, Emilia Romagna, Kassel, Niederbayern, Hannover, Prov. West-
Vlaanderen, Freiburg, Detmold, Surrey, East and West Sussex and Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability S N W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Slovenia Vzhodna Slovenija SI03

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 47.0 157/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 67 210/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 62.0 137/263 Efficiency dimension 55.8 162/263 Innovation dimension 39.7 166/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 41.7 175/263 68.2 88/263 Technological Readiness 49.4 188/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
55.4 20/28 Labour Market Efficiency 49.4 191/263 Business Sophistication 32.1 155/263
Stability

Infrastructure 19.49 182/263 Market Size 21.7 172/263 Innovation 37.1 143/263

Health 83.7 89/263

Basic Education 83.2 5/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Centro (PT), Nyugat-Dunntl, Stredn Morava, Ionia Nisia, Andaluca, Severovchod, Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, West Wales and The Valleys,
Dytiki Makedonia, Runion, Alentejo, Sterea Ellada, Pomorskie, Moravskoslezsko and Slaskie

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
S

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Slovenia Zahodna Slovenija SI04

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 61.4 113/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 98 108/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 62.1 136/263 Efficiency dimension 67.1 113/263 Innovation dimension 61.0 80/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 41.7 175/263 76.9 35/263 Technological Readiness 59.3 164/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
55.4 20/28 Labour Market Efficiency 67.9 111/263 Business Sophistication 49.2 50/263
Stability

Infrastructure 19.70 180/263 Market Size 23.9 159/263 Innovation 63.4 34/263

Health 84.1 84/263

Basic Education 83.2 5/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: North Yorkshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Eastern Scotland, Alsace, Midi-Pyrnes, Trier, Prov. Limburg (BE), La Rioja, Illes
Balears, Pays de la Loire, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Etel-Suomi, Friesland (NL), Attiki and East Anglia

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Slovakia Bratislavsk kraj SK01

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.4 96/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 187 3/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 44.9 210/263 Efficiency dimension 74.2 53/263 Innovation dimension 65.3 58/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 28.1 218/263 73.1 50/263 Technological Readiness 62.5 159/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
70.1 12/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.0 82/263 Business Sophistication 55.6 30/263
Stability

Infrastructure 41.54 102/263 Market Size 44.6 70/263 Innovation 64.3 31/263

Health 70.9 194/263

Basic Education 33.2 23/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Groningen, le de France, Oberbayern, Stockholm, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hamburg, Darmstadt, North Eastern
Scotland, Bremen, Stuttgart, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting
zone and Salzburg

RCI 2016 *
W

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension W

Higher Education and


Institutions * Technological Readiness
W lifelong learning N W
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Slovakia Zpadn Slovensko SK02

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 33.8 196/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 72 196/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 36.8 222/263 Efficiency dimension 51.7 182/263 Innovation dimension 29.1 204/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.2 210/263 57.1 178/263 Technological Readiness 59.7 162/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
70.1 12/28 Labour Market Efficiency 51.8 182/263 Business Sophistication 15.2 232/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.37 157/263 Market Size 24.0 159/263 Innovation 20.3 209/263

Health 57.8 214/263

Basic Education 33.2 23/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Wielkopolskie, Basilicata, Castilla-La Mancha, Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Lietuva, Guadeloupe, Slaskie, Moravskoslezsko, Regio Autnoma da
Madeira, Alentejo, Runion, Jihozpad, Dytiki Makedonia, Tees Valley and Durham and Sardegna

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education *
W

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Slovakia Stredn Slovensko SK03

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 29.7 211/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 60 226/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 31.7 225/263 Efficiency dimension 47.1 199/263 Innovation dimension 32.2 190/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 30.2 210/263 56.5 184/263 Technological Readiness 58.8 166/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
70.1 12/28 Labour Market Efficiency 44.0 212/263 Business Sophistication 19.4 217/263
Stability

Infrastructure 10.35 219/263 Market Size 18.9 188/263 Innovation 24.3 192/263

Health 54.6 219/263

Basic Education 33.2 23/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Peloponnisos, Malopolskie, Kzp-Dunntl, Calabria, Kontinentalna Hrvatska, Kriti, Latvija, Voreio Aigaio, Vest, Jadranska Hrvatska, Ldzkie,
Kentriki Makedonia, Severozpad, Campania and Extremadura

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


Slovakia Vchodn Slovensko SK04

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 24.0 225/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 52 241/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 27.4 228/263 Efficiency dimension 42.0 219/263 Innovation dimension 28.8 205/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 27.4 219/263 53.3 200/263 Technological Readiness 60.5 161/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
70.1 12/28 Labour Market Efficiency 38.4 227/263 Business Sophistication 17.3 224/263
Stability

Infrastructure 9.98 220/263 Market Size 14.2 210/263 Innovation 16.2 232/263

Health 45.3 235/263

Basic Education 33.2 23/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Ipeiros, Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki, Centru, Opolskie, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Swietokrzyskie, Dytiki Ellada, Thessalia, Podlaskie, Sud Est, Lubuskie,
Warminsko-Mazurskie, Zachodniopomorskie, Guyane and Nord Vest

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom London and regions covered by its commuting zone UK00

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 100.0 1/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 160 13/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 86.6 47/263 Efficiency dimension 100.0 1/263 Innovation dimension 86.0 6/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.9 59/263 85.0 10/263 Technological Readiness 95.4 10/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 75.6 71/263 Business Sophistication 79.3 2/263
Stability

Infrastructure 93.49 3/263 Market Size 100.0 1/263 Innovation 60.7 43/263

Health 90.9 16/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Hovedstaden, Stuttgart, Utrecht, Bremen, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , North Eastern Scotland, Darmstadt, Salzburg,
Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and
Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Stockholm and land

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Tees Valley and Durham UKC1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 56.9 131/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 74 189/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 67.5 113/263 Efficiency dimension 61.3 142/263 Innovation dimension 57.5 101/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.1 88/263 64.3 119/263 Technological Readiness 85.9 94/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 58.8 154/263 Business Sophistication 41.1 90/263
Stability

Infrastructure 37.57 116/263 Market Size 34.4 112/263 Innovation 40.2 128/263

Health 80.8 129/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Sardegna, Jihozpad, Yugozapaden, Regin de Murcia, Eesti, Regio Autnoma da Madeira, Guadeloupe, Dolnoslaskie, Lietuva, Molise, Castilla-
La Mancha, South Yorkshire, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Martinique and Wielkopolskie

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Northumberland and Tyne and Wear UKC2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 60.5 118/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 84 155/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 67.2 115/263 Efficiency dimension 64.3 129/263 Innovation dimension 62.1 73/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.1 88/263 69.4 76/263 Technological Readiness 85.9 94/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 66.7 120/263 Business Sophistication 46.6 60/263
Stability

Infrastructure 32.96 128/263 Market Size 28.2 139/263 Innovation 45.8 97/263

Health 83.4 89/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Namur, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Cantabria, Devon, Northern Ireland, Malta, Kpros,
Lancashire, Basse-Normandie, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais, Languedoc-Roussillon and Chemnitz

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Cumbria UKD1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 62.9 110/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 93 122/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 70.1 107/263 Efficiency dimension 68.0 107/263 Innovation dimension 58.1 97/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 71.2 63/263 Technological Readiness 88.8 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.7 76/263 Business Sophistication 46.0 63/263
Stability

Infrastructure 46.66 87/263 Market Size 28.8 137/263 Innovation 33.2 160/263

Health 80.1 136/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Dresden, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Champagne-Ardenne, Haute-Normandie, Aquitaine, Marche, Highlands and Islands, Drenthe, Greater Manchester,
West Yorkshire, Friesland (NL), East Wales, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Pays de la Loire and Illes Balears

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Greater Manchester UKD3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.0 44/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 92 125/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 73.4 97/263 Efficiency dimension 77.8 34/263 Innovation dimension 70.8 30/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 72.0 55/263 Technological Readiness 88.8 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 66.9 119/263 Business Sophistication 61.8 14/263
Stability

Infrastructure 54.64 67/263 Market Size 63.2 21/263 Innovation 47.7 84/263

Health 83.5 89/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: West Yorkshire, Highlands and Islands, East Wales, Bourgogne, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Cumbria, Dresden, Centre, Champagne-Ardenne, Umbria,
Dorset and Somerset, Corse, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT) and Haute-Normandie

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Lancashire UKD4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 67.5 85/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 82 161/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 71.0 104/263 Efficiency dimension 72.9 64/263 Innovation dimension 61.5 79/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 69.1 79/263 Technological Readiness 88.8 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 68.0 111/263 Business Sophistication 47.4 56/263
Stability

Infrastructure 49.68 76/263 Market Size 52.2 50/263 Innovation 40.7 126/263

Health 80.2 136/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Shropshire and Staffordshire, Northern Ireland, Languedoc-Roussillon, Principado de Asturias, Cantabria, Picardie, East Yorkshire and Northern
Lincolnshire, Merseyside, Galicia, Lorraine, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Prov. Namur and Northumberland and Tyne and Wear

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Cheshire UKD6

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 85.1 16/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 124 44/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 81.4 70/263 Efficiency dimension 85.8 9/263 Innovation dimension 76.5 20/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 76.6 37/263 Technological Readiness 88.8 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 82.4 27/263 Business Sophistication 63.4 11/263
Stability

Infrastructure 83.65 6/263 Market Size 65.0 19/263 Innovation 60.7 43/263

Health 84.6 79/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Praha and regions covered by its commuting zone , Schwaben, Comunidad de Madrid, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Detmold, Unterfranken,
Freiburg, Hannover, Niederbayern, Emilia Romagna, Oberpfalz, Bucuresti Ilfov, Pas Vasco, Vstsverige and Rheinhessen-Pfalz

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Merseyside UKD7

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 68.9 76/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 81 166/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 71.1 103/263 Efficiency dimension 72.3 68/263 Innovation dimension 67.5 45/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 68.7 67/263 66.7 105/263 Technological Readiness 88.8 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 66.3 122/263 Business Sophistication 55.7 28/263
Stability

Infrastructure 46.45 89/263 Market Size 55.9 37/263 Innovation 46.4 91/263

Health 83.0 105/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Picardie, Galicia, Lorraine, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Principado de Asturias, Comunidad Valenciana, Languedoc-Roussillon, Shropshire and
Staffordshire, Franche-Comt, Lancashire, Northern Ireland, Notio Aigaio, Canarias and Cantabria

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire UKE1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 57.7 126/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 83 158/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 69.5 109/263 Efficiency dimension 62.5 137/263 Innovation dimension 54.9 115/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.6 60/263 61.8 145/263 Technological Readiness 90.8 39/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 64.1 130/263 Business Sophistication 37.9 116/263
Stability

Infrastructure 34.55 122/263 Market Size 36.6 101/263 Innovation 32.8 163/263

Health 86.4 58/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Cantabria, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Prov. Namur, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Northern Ireland, Lancashire, Shropshire and
Staffordshire, Languedoc-Roussillon, Devon, Principado de Asturias, Picardie, Merseyside, Malta, Galicia and Kpros

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom North Yorkshire UKE2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 77.4 35/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 97 109/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 78.3 79/263 Efficiency dimension 80.3 24/263 Innovation dimension 69.3 37/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.6 60/263 79.2 28/263 Technological Readiness 90.8 39/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 81.1 33/263 Business Sophistication 55.1 31/263
Stability

Infrastructure 68.92 31/263 Market Size 46.5 63/263 Innovation 49.9 75/263

Health 85.9 63/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Zahodna Slovenija, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Midi-Pyrnes, Eastern Scotland, Alsace, Trier, Prov. Limburg (BE), Illes
Balears, Pays de la Loire, La Rioja, Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Friesland (NL), Etel-Suomi, Attiki and Drenthe

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom South Yorkshire UKE3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 67.0 87/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 76 182/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 75.5 89/263 Efficiency dimension 70.7 81/263 Innovation dimension 60.9 80/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.6 60/263 67.7 93/263 Technological Readiness 90.8 39/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 59.5 151/263 Business Sophistication 47.1 57/263
Stability

Infrastructure 61.60 50/263 Market Size 56.0 35/263 Innovation 37.8 136/263

Health 83.3 89/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, Molise, Martinique, Dolnoslaskie, Eesti, Regin de Murcia, Yugozapaden, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, Prov.
Luxembourg (BE), Sardegna, Tees Valley and Durham, Algarve, Prov. Hainaut, Jihozpad and Jihovchod

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom West Yorkshire UKE4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 72.1 52/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 91 126/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 73.2 98/263 Efficiency dimension 74.8 50/263 Innovation dimension 68.7 41/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.6 60/263 68.0 88/263 Technological Readiness 90.8 39/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 69.4 106/263 Business Sophistication 57.9 20/263
Stability

Infrastructure 53.65 69/263 Market Size 58.2 31/263 Innovation 45.2 103/263

Health 82.8 105/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Greater Manchester, East Wales, Highlands and Islands, Bourgogne, Centre, Umbria, Dorset and Somerset, Corse, Bretagne, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi,
Cumbria, Burgenland (AT), Dresden, Champagne-Ardenne and South Western Scotland

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire UKF1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 71.9 54/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 87 143/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 74.7 92/263 Efficiency dimension 75.4 46/263 Innovation dimension 67.0 48/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 71.4 59/263 Technological Readiness 93.0 22/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 67.2 118/263 Business Sophistication 46.5 61/263
Stability

Infrastructure 57.37 60/263 Market Size 56.9 34/263 Innovation 52.3 65/263

Health 86.8 56/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: West Midlands, Sachsen-Anhalt, Thringen, Auvergne, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western, Poitou-Charentes, Castilla y Len, Chemnitz, Nord
Pas de Calais, Sjlland, Prov. Lige, Kent, Basse-Normandie and Kpros

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire UKF2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.2 43/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 96 114/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 78.4 79/263 Efficiency dimension 77.4 36/263 Innovation dimension 69.0 40/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 74.2 45/263 Technological Readiness 93.0 22/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 70.8 100/263 Business Sophistication 53.6 34/263
Stability

Infrastructure 73.09 21/263 Market Size 55.1 39/263 Innovation 49.1 79/263

Health 85.6 72/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Friesland (NL), Pays de la Loire, Illes Balears, Drenthe, Marche, Aquitaine, Haute-Normandie, Midi-Pyrnes, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and
Warwickshire, Champagne-Ardenne, North Yorkshire, Dresden, Cumbria, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi and Zahodna Slovenija

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Lincolnshire UKF3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 64.5 103/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 81 170/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 70.0 108/263 Efficiency dimension 70.5 82/263 Innovation dimension 58.2 96/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.0 88/263 68.1 88/263 Technological Readiness 93.0 22/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 76.1 66/263 Business Sophistication 43.2 79/263
Stability

Infrastructure 43.62 95/263 Market Size 39.4 91/263 Innovation 33.2 160/263

Health 83.5 89/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Limousin, Lorraine, Galicia, Merseyside, Comunidad Valenciana, Picardie, Principado de Asturias, Franche-Comt, Languedoc-Roussillon, Notio
Aigaio, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Lancashire, Canarias, Northern Ireland and Jihovchod

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire UKG1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.8 38/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 97 110/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 76.8 83/263 Efficiency dimension 78.0 33/263 Innovation dimension 70.4 33/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.6 97/263 71.4 59/263 Technological Readiness 89.3 59/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.9 55/263 Business Sophistication 56.4 24/263
Stability

Infrastructure 66.71 35/263 Market Size 54.5 42/263 Innovation 52.6 64/263

Health 86.2 63/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Midi-Pyrnes, North Yorkshire, Zahodna Slovenija, Illes Balears, Pays de la Loire, Eastern Scotland, Alsace, Trier, Prov. Limburg (BE),
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Friesland (NL), La Rioja, Drenthe, Marche and Etel-Suomi

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Shropshire and Staffordshire UKG2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 68.8 76/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 82 162/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 75.5 89/263 Efficiency dimension 73.3 59/263 Innovation dimension 60.8 84/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.6 97/263 66.6 105/263 Technological Readiness 89.3 59/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 72.0 97/263 Business Sophistication 48.1 54/263
Stability

Infrastructure 66.51 37/263 Market Size 53.5 45/263 Innovation 37.5 139/263

Health 82.6 111/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Languedoc-Roussillon, Lancashire, Northern Ireland, Principado de Asturias, Picardie, Merseyside, Galicia, Lorraine, Cantabria, East Yorkshire and
Northern Lincolnshire, Limousin, Lincolnshire, Comunidad Valenciana, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Prov. Namur

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom West Midlands UKG3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 65.2 98/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 87 144/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 75.8 87/263 Efficiency dimension 65.3 122/263 Innovation dimension 68.0 43/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.6 97/263 60.2 156/263 Technological Readiness 89.3 59/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 56.0 166/263 Business Sophistication 56.4 24/263
Stability

Infrastructure 71.23 27/263 Market Size 54.8 40/263 Innovation 46.6 89/263

Health 80.0 136/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Sachsen-Anhalt, Thringen, Auvergne, Abruzzo, Border, Midland and Western, Castilla y Len, Poitou-Charentes,
Chemnitz, Nord Pas de Calais, Sjlland, Prov. Lige, Kent, Basse-Normandie and Kpros

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom East Anglia UKH1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 75.7 39/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 101 100/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 75.2 91/263 Efficiency dimension 73.9 57/263 Innovation dimension 79.8 16/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 69.2 66/263 73.0 51/263 Technological Readiness 94.5 12/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 77.3 60/263 Business Sophistication 57.3 22/263
Stability

Infrastructure 55.62 65/263 Market Size 40.6 86/263 Innovation 71.7 15/263

Health 87.4 39/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Aragn, Attiki, Etel-Suomi, Zeeland, La Rioja, Norra Mellansverige, Leipzig, Lnsi-Suomi, Prov. Limburg (BE), Trier, Alsace, Eastern Scotland,
Provence-Alpes-Cte d'Azur, Piemonte and Zahodna Slovenija

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire UKJ1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 97.7 2/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 150 18/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 87.7 42/263 Efficiency dimension 93.0 2/263 Innovation dimension 92.2 2/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.9 39/263 82.9 15/263 Technological Readiness 97.2 2/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 82.9 24/263 Business Sophistication 65.4 8/263
Stability

Infrastructure 96.31 2/263 Market Size 76.1 5/263 Innovation 92.1 3/263

Health 91.1 14/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Salzburg, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone
, Utrecht, land, Hovedstaden, Prov. Antwerpen, Karlsruhe, London and regions covered by its commuting zone , Tirol, Vorarlberg, Stuttgart and Bremen

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Surrey, East and West Sussex UKJ2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 94.0 5/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 116 60/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 81.8 69/263 Efficiency dimension 91.6 4/263 Innovation dimension 88.4 5/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.9 39/263 79.7 25/263 Technological Readiness 97.2 2/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.7 47/263 Business Sophistication 76.4 3/263
Stability

Infrastructure 72.60 23/263 Market Size 80.5 4/263 Innovation 68.8 23/263

Health 91.8 9/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. West-Vlaanderen, Kassel, Oberfranken, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Midtjylland, Steiermark, Arnsberg, Lazio, Syddanmark, Hampshire and
Isle of Wight, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Saarland, vre Norrland, Weser-Ems and Veneto

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Hampshire and Isle of Wight UKJ3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 88.6 10/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 112 66/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 81.1 71/263 Efficiency dimension 87.1 8/263 Innovation dimension 83.3 10/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.9 39/263 81.1 19/263 Technological Readiness 97.2 2/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 86.2 7/263 Business Sophistication 64.4 9/263
Stability

Infrastructure 69.27 29/263 Market Size 58.3 30/263 Innovation 69.7 21/263

Health 92.5 8/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Syddanmark, Weser-Ems, Veneto, Arnsberg, Gelderland, Midtjylland, Comunidad Foral de
Navarra, Oberfranken, Mellersta Norrland, Krnten, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Mnster, Limburg (NL) and stra Mellansverige

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W S S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Kent UKJ4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 80.5 26/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 89 137/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 83.3 62/263 Efficiency dimension 80.4 24/263 Innovation dimension 76.3 21/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 70.9 39/263 69.4 76/263 Technological Readiness 97.2 2/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 74.7 76/263 Business Sophistication 64.3 10/263
Stability

Infrastructure 80.04 12/263 Market Size 67.3 12/263 Innovation 51.7 69/263

Health 90.6 18/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Lige, Poitou-Charentes, Lneburg, Border, Midland and Western, Abruzzo, Thringen, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, West Midlands,
Sachsen-Anhalt, South Western Scotland, Auvergne, Burgenland (AT), Bretagne, Corse and Dorset and Somerset

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


S S S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area UKK1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 81.0 25/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 112 67/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 76.2 86/263 Efficiency dimension 78.8 29/263 Innovation dimension 81.3 13/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 65.2 107/263 74.7 43/263 Technological Readiness 94.3 13/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 79.5 41/263 Business Sophistication 61.2 15/263
Stability

Infrastructure 60.40 53/263 Market Size 50.3 54/263 Innovation 71.1 19/263

Health 90.3 20/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Syddanmark, Weser-Ems, Veneto, Arnsberg, Gelderland, Midtjylland, Comunidad Foral de Navarra, Oberfranken,
Mellersta Norrland, Krnten, Prov. Oost-Vlaanderen, Mnster, Limburg (NL) and stra Mellansverige

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Dorset and Somerset UKK2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 71.8 54/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 90 131/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 70.4 106/263 Efficiency dimension 75.6 44/263 Innovation dimension 70.2 33/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 65.2 107/263 78.3 30/263 Technological Readiness 94.3 13/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 73.2 87/263 Business Sophistication 57.4 21/263
Stability

Infrastructure 40.74 106/263 Market Size 41.6 84/263 Innovation 46.5 91/263

Health 88.5 32/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Corse, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT), Umbria, Centre, Bourgogne, South Western Scotland, Lneburg, Kent, Prov. Lige, East Wales, Poitou-
Charentes, West Yorkshire, Border, Midland and Western and Abruzzo

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Cornwall and Isles of Scilly UKK3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 55.8 133/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 78 179/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 60.9 142/263 Efficiency dimension 59.3 151/263 Innovation dimension 63.9 63/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 65.2 107/263 63.6 127/263 Technological Readiness 94.3 13/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 65.9 123/263 Business Sophistication 52.7 37/263
Stability

Infrastructure 9.53 221/263 Market Size 23.2 165/263 Innovation 35.6 149/263

Health 84.7 79/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Prov. Luxembourg (BE), Algarve, Prov. Hainaut, Jihovchod, Martinique, Canarias, Ciudad Autnoma de Ceuta, South Yorkshire, Notio Aigaio,
Molise, Dolnoslaskie, Eesti, Franche-Comt, Regin de Murcia and Yugozapaden

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Devon UKK4

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 66.6 89/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 85 154/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 66.0 120/263 Efficiency dimension 71.8 73/263 Innovation dimension 65.6 55/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 65.2 107/263 75.4 42/263 Technological Readiness 94.3 13/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.9 45/263 Business Sophistication 49.9 48/263
Stability

Infrastructure 25.04 160/263 Market Size 29.6 133/263 Innovation 43.4 112/263

Health 87.6 39/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Malta, Kpros, Basse-Normandie, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Prov. Namur, Sjlland, Nord Pas de Calais, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern,
Chemnitz, Castilla y Len, Auvergne, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Cantabria, Sachsen-Anhalt and West Midlands

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom West Wales and The Valleys UKL1

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 55.5 134/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 69 204/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 2
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 63.8 129/263 Efficiency dimension 61.1 144/263 Innovation dimension 56.9 107/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 63.8 113/263 67.5 98/263 Technological Readiness 88.7 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.9 132/263 Business Sophistication 40.8 95/263
Stability

Infrastructure 27.16 146/263 Market Size 25.2 154/263 Innovation 36.6 145/263

Health 81.3 124/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Ciudad Autnoma de Melilla, Severovchod, Andaluca, Dytiki Makedonia, Stredn Morava, Nyugat-Dunntl, Runion, Vzhodna Slovenija,
Alentejo, Moravskoslezsko, Slaskie, Centro (PT), Regio Autnoma dos Aores, Ionia Nisia and Basilicata

RCI 2016
S

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


S S Innovation dimension S

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
S lifelong learning S S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S S

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom East Wales UKL2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 68.4 79/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 91 127/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 69.3 110/263 Efficiency dimension 71.6 73/263 Innovation dimension 67.3 46/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 63.8 113/263 75.6 41/263 Technological Readiness 88.7 67/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 70.9 100/263 Business Sophistication 51.7 41/263
Stability

Infrastructure 43.08 98/263 Market Size 36.2 105/263 Innovation 50.8 73/263

Health 85.0 77/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: West Yorkshire, Greater Manchester, Highlands and Islands, Bourgogne, Centre, Umbria, Dorset and Somerset, Corse, Bretagne, Burgenland (AT),
South Western Scotland, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Cumbria, Dresden and Champagne-Ardenne

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
S

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Eastern Scotland UKM2

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 70.9 58/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 98 107/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 67.0 116/263 Efficiency dimension 74.3 53/263 Innovation dimension 70.3 33/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.2 101/263 80.6 23/263 Technological Readiness 89.8 54/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 75.0 75/263 Business Sophistication 53.1 35/263
Stability

Infrastructure 39.10 109/263 Market Size 32.7 120/263 Innovation 55.8 57/263

Health 79.2 151/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Alsace, Trier, Prov. Limburg (BE), Zahodna Slovenija, La Rioja, North Yorkshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Midi-Pyrnes,
Etel-Suomi, Attiki, East Anglia, Illes Balears, Aragn, Pays de la Loire and Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom South Western Scotland UKM3

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 61.6 112/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 89 135/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 65.5 123/263 Efficiency dimension 66.9 114/263 Innovation dimension 61.1 80/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.2 101/263 73.4 49/263 Technological Readiness 89.8 54/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 66.7 120/263 Business Sophistication 43.9 73/263
Stability

Infrastructure 35.94 119/263 Market Size 29.9 131/263 Innovation 42.7 116/263

Health 77.3 169/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Burgenland (AT), Bretagne, Corse, Dorset and Somerset, Umbria, Centre, Bourgogne, Lneburg, Kent, Prov. Lige, Poitou-Charentes, Border,
Midland and Western, Abruzzo, Thringen and Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure Market Size Innovation


N N N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom North Eastern Scotland UKM5

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 68.3 79/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 164 10/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 5
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 61.6 139/263 Efficiency dimension 72.9 64/263 Innovation dimension 67.0 48/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.2 101/263 76.8 35/263 Technological Readiness 89.8 54/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 80.4 36/263 Business Sophistication 46.0 63/263
Stability

Infrastructure 18.53 186/263 Market Size 29.2 134/263 Innovation 55.8 57/263

Health 79.0 154/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Peer Regions: Darmstadt, Bremen, Stuttgart, Bruxelles and regions covered by its commuting zone , London and regions covered by its commuting zone ,
Hovedstaden, Utrecht, Amsterdam and regions covered by its commuting zone , Salzburg, Stockholm, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Provincia
Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen, Southern and Eastern, Helsinki-Uusimaa and Oberbayern

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension * Efficiency dimension


W N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N N
Macroeconomic
* Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability W N N

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health *
W

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Highlands and Islands UKM6

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 58.7 123/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 92 124/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 4
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 58.9 148/263 Efficiency dimension 68.1 107/263 Innovation dimension 53.1 125/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 66.2 101/263 77.7 33/263 Technological Readiness 89.8 54/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 78.7 47/263 Business Sophistication 28.9 176/263
Stability

Infrastructure 13.06 206/263 Market Size 15.6 204/263 Innovation 39.9 130/263

Health 75.6 175/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, East Wales, Pohjois-ja It-Suomi, Cumbria, Dresden, Champagne-Ardenne, Haute-Normandie, Bourgogne,
Centre, Aquitaine, Umbria, Marche, Dorset and Somerset and Corse

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning S N
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N S W

Infrastructure * Market Size * Innovation


W W N

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range


United Kingdom Northern Ireland UKN0

Score Rank
0-100

RCI 2016 0-100 53.2 145/263

GDP per head


EU-28=100 82 160/263
(PPS)
Stage of
1-5 3
development
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
0-100 0-100 0-100
Basic dimension 61.8 138/263 Efficiency dimension 57.4 155/263 Innovation dimension 59.0 90/263

Higher Education and


Institutions 67.4 82/263 62.4 140/263 Technological Readiness 90.5 44/263
lifelong learning
Macroeconomic
50.2 23/28 Labour Market Efficiency 62.8 132/263 Business Sophistication 37.1 122/263
Stability

Infrastructure 15.44 197/263 Market Size 22.4 166/263 Innovation 44.8 104/263

Health 80.8 129/263

Basic Education 70.9 10/28

Equal ranking is assigned if the difference in score is not above 0.1


Macroeconomic Stability and Basic Education at the country level
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Peer Regions: Lancashire, Shropshire and Staffordshire, Languedoc-Roussillon, Cantabria, East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, Principado de Asturias,
Picardie, Merseyside, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Prov. Namur, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Galicia, Lorraine, Limousin and Lincolnshire

RCI 2016
N

Basic dimension Efficiency dimension


N N Innovation dimension N

Higher Education and


Institutions Technological Readiness
N lifelong learning N S
Macroeconomic
Labour Market Efficiency Business Sophistication
Stability N N N

Infrastructure * Market Size Innovation


W N S

Health
N

Basic Education
N

Strength relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Neither strength nor weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

Weakness relative to the 15 regions with most similar GDP per capita

* Indicates a strength or weakness that is close to the expected range

You might also like