would

recommend other organizations to attend the event

think that WG meetings provided a good basis for the Group's activities in the coming year

Organization of the event/logistics 96.61%

EaP CSF new website 92,72%

Content of the event 91,67%

Networking opportunities 91,67%

Opportunity for presenting publications 89,48%

Format of the event 89,47%

Selection of attendees 51,61%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10
88.57%

85.71%

84.85%

80.49%

0
The current state of global and EU Parallel sessions based on the EaP CSF The Eastern Neighbourhood: a reliable Working Group meetings
affairs and the repercussions for the priorities partner or a source of mounting
EaP concerns for the EU?

"Transparency and accountability of the EU funding in the EaP: involving civil society in programming, implementation and
evaluation"

"Investing in the future: EU youth policies and the realities of the EaP countries"

"The EaP countries within the EU energy framework: strengthening cooperation in face of common challenges"

Do you consider adoption of resolutions an essential

73,77%
part of the event?

Did you have enough time to submit draft

62,30%
resolutions?

Did you manage to read the entire text of resolutions

54,10%
before the event?

Do you consider the adoption of resolutions as useful? 38,89%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70