Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
be and min respectively. The peak area of Furosemide and For RP-HPLC method, several different mobile phases were tried and
Spironolactone in each chromatogram was recorded. finally mobile phase containing Acetonitrile: water was found to be
optimized and well defined. Resolved peaks of Furosemide and
s.d= standard deviation. Spironolactone with retention time (mean s.d.)3.81 min and 7.28
min were obtained for Furosemide and Spironolactone respectively.
Accuracy
The representative chromatogram of sample solution of Furosemide
To study accuracy of the method, recovery studies were carried out (4 g/ml) and Spironolactone (10 g/ml) is shown in Fig 1. The
by addition of standard drug sample in a tablet sample at 50%, calibration curve for each drug was obtained separately by plotting
100% and 150%. The percentage of recovery was calculated (Table- as peak area concentration over the range of 2-10 g/ml for
3). Furosemide and 5 -25 g/ml for Spironolactone. From, calibration
curve of Furosemide (Fig 2), it was found to linear with r 2= 0.995
Precision and from calibration curve of Spironolactone (Fig 3) it was found to
linear with r2= 0.999. The % recoveries for Furosemide and
It was carried out by preparing 3 replicates of 3 different Spironolactone were found to be 99.25%-101.45% and 99.1%-
concentrations within the linearity range and then injecting each 100.26% respectively, which were satisfactory (Table-3). The
solution. The peak area of Furosemide and Spironolactone in each precision is usually expressed as % RSD. The intraday precision for
chromatogram was recorded in order to record any intra day Furosemide and Spironolactone were found to be 0.09-1.181 and
variation. To record inter day variation, 3 different concentration 0.863-1.585 respectively. The inter day precision for
solution within the linearity range were analyzed for 3 different Furosemide and Spironolactone were found to be 0.096-1.623 and
days. The peak area of each drug was recorded and % RSD (% 0.044-1.22 respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) for Furosemide
relative standard deviation) was calculated for both series of and Spironolactone were 0.0025g/ml and 0.00099 g/ml
analysis. respectively. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for Furosemide and
Spironolactone were 0.00033 g/ml and 0.00302 g/ml
Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) respectively.
They were calculated as 3.3 /S and 10 /S respectively. Where is Table 2: System suitability parameters for RP-HPLC
the standard deviation of the response (y- intercept) and S is the
mean of the slope of calibration plot. Sr no. Parameter Furosemide Spironolactone
1 Asymmetry 1.327 1.043
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2 Resolution 8.350 8.350
3 Tailing 1.184 0.994
Table-3: Recovery studies of Furosemide and Spironolactone
Method Level of recovery Amount taken(g/ml) Amount added (g/ml) Total amount found (g/ml)* % recovery
Furo Spiro Furo Spiro Furo Spiro Furo Spiro
RP-HPLC 0% 4 10 0 0 4.058 9.91 101.45 99.1
50% 4 10 2 5 6.082 15.04 101.33 100.26
100% 4 10 4 10 7.946 19.93 99.25 99.65
150% 4 10 6 15 9.917 25.04 99.17 100.19
196
Patel et al.
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 5, Issue 3, 2012,195-198
197
Patel et al.
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 5, Issue 3, 2012,195-198
6. Joel GH, Lee EL, Alfred GG. Goodman and Gilmans the spectrophotometric-partial least squares (PLS-1) method for
pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 11th Ed. New York: Mc the simultaneous determination of furosemide and amiloride
Graw Hill; 2001. p. 743,853. hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations. J Pharm
7. Indian Pharmacopoeia. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Biomed Anal. 2001 Oct; 26(3):443-51.
Ghaziabad; 2010 vol 3. p.2147. 16. Dinc E, Ustundag O. Spectophotometric quantitative
8. British Pharmacopoeia. Ph Euro monograph 1590. London, resolution of hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone in
Medicines and Health care products Regulatory Agency tablets by chemometric analysis methods. Farmaco. 2003; 58;
(MHRA); 2003 vol 2. p.1742. 1151-61.
9. ONeil MJ. The Merck index- an encyclopedia of chemicals, 17. Kaukonen AM, Vuorela P, Vuorela H, Mannermaa JP. High-
drugs and biological. 13th Ed. New Jersy: Merck and Co., INC. performance liquid chromatography methods for the
p.764, 1562. separation and quantitation of spironolactone and its
10. Sweetman SC. Martindale; the complete drug reference. 33rd degradation products in aqueous formulations and of its
ed. London: Pharmaceutical press; 2002. P.893-6,973-5. metabolites in rat serum. J Chromatogram A. 1998; 797:271-
11. Dias ILT, Martins JLS, Neto GO. Determination of furosemide 81.
by first-derivative spectrophotometric method. Anal Lett. 18. Dinc E, Baleanu D, Ustundag O. An approach to quantitative
2005; 38:1159-66. two-component analysis of a mixture containing
12. Carda-Broch S, Esteve-Romero J, Ruiz-Angel MJ, Garca- hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone in tablets by one
Alvarez-Coque MC. Determination of furosemide in urine dimensional continuous daubechies and biorthogonal wavelet
samples by direct injection in a micellar liquid analysis of UV spectra. Spectroscopy letters. 2003; 36:341-55.
chromatographic system. Analyst. 2002 Jan; 127(1):29-34. 19. Millership JS. Ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry for
13. Nagori BP, Renu S. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous the determination of furosemide and spironolactone in a
estimation of furosemide and amiloride hydrochloride in capsule formulation. Farmaco. 2005; 60:333-8.
tablet formulation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010; 72:384-7. 20. Baranowska I, Wilczek A, Baranowski J. Rapid UHPLC method
14. Semaan FL, Cavalheiro EDG. Spectrophotometric for simultaneous determination of Vancomycin, Terbinafine,
determination of furosemide based on its complexation with Spironolactone, Furosemide and their metabolites. Anal sci.
Fe (iii) in ethanolic medium using a flow injection procedure. 2010; 26(7):755-9.
Anal Lett. 2006; 39:2557-67. 21. Ibition. European Journal of Pharmacology, 51: 17-24.
15. Ferraro M C, Castellano P M, Kaufman T S . A
198