20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

Page 1
Coroner Sara Hinchey J 1-5-2017

Coroners Court of Victoria
65 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, VIC 3006
5 Phone: 1300 309 519 Calling from overseas: (+61 3) 8688 0700
Fax: 1300 546 989
General enquires (including submissions of all Forms): courtadmin@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
Coronial Admissions and Enquires Office: cae@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
10 Ref: 20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

Madam,
further to my 13 February 2017 submission and Supplement 1 and Supplement 2 of 13-
4-2017, Supplement 3+COMPLAINT of 14-4-2017, Supplement 4+COMPLAINT of 16-4-
2017, Supplement 5+COMPLAINTof 15-4-2017, Supplement 6 of 23-4-2017, Supplement 7 of
15 24-4-2017, Supplement 8 of 25-4-2017, I hold it appropriate to provide this Supplement 9 of 1-5-
2017.
Whenever a person contacted me (MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL special life line
service) about problems I tried not to be judgmental about the person. It is because of this I could
20 discover issues that ordinary by others were overlooked. A clear example was the Colosimo case
where some 20 lawyers (including judicial officers) over the years had been involved in the
matters and yet not a single one had bothered to simply be open minded and consider all relevant
facts. I did and the result was in a successful appeal. Perhaps because I was not funded by any
government and neither charged any person for my services it was that I didnt have dollar signs
25 in my eyes and actually did just care about the truth.
.
We now have a person who is to have been the driver of a Bourke Street carnage, and well. I am
in no position to state that the person arrested was, as after all that is for the courts to determine.
No one can ignore the fact of at least 6 deaths and many others injured. However, the aim of a
30 coroners court (at least in my view) is to establish the truth and nothing but the truth and not
what may serve anyone specifically that would distort the truth. What therefore is needed is to go
beyond mere assumptions of a person having acted in a manner that caused mayhem but to go
and search for possible reasons that may have caused this conduct and if indeed the police,
government, etc, acted appropriately in all the circumstances.
35 We had about immediately the Premier Daniel Andrews, at least going by media report, claiming
that the Police had acted appropriately. It also and not to overlook the federal government had
claimed to have acted (well their 28 March 2017 correspondence responding to my 21 December
2016 portrays this, regardless of the truth!)
40 I have absolutely no doubt that the Government likely will present to the coroner a claim it acted,
etc, and well we have so to say a Government on the ball.
And well this submission contemplates to show the stark reality of what is going on versus the
claims by the police/government.
45 What we need is first of all to recognise that no religion of any kind is or can be above the
constitution, being the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). Unless this is
the basis we all lived by we will have a turmoil that will continue for ever in the day.
Page 1 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
Page 2
No religious excuses for violating the rules of law that is validly enacted laws within
constitutional context.
However we also must consider issues that ordinary are ignored and yet at least to my
understanding can be a reason of many of the problems we are facing on a daily basis.
5
Before going further into this let me first pay tribute to this soldier and his fallen soldiers who
served their country and deserves the right to have it recognised by politicians and others alike
they did so to protect Australia for the Freedoms were have within constitutional context.
QUOTE
10 The Last Veteran -- No further words are necessary
People
Gil May <gilmay97@gmail.com>
Today at 11:42 (30-4-2017)
To
15 reader@hotmail.com.au
Hide
BCC
inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
Hide
20 Photos
image.jpeg
Message body
The Last Veteran -- No further words are necessary

25
GOD BLESS HIM: This is what Australia is all about--Our national Pride and Respect.
30 Migrants who refuse to share it in favour of other beliefs, you are not welcome: Please Leave and go
back to the place you disliked and left.
YOU EITHER LOVE OUR AUSTRALIAN TRADITIONS OF ANZAC DAY AND SHARE OUR
TRADITIONAL CULTUREOR LEAVE
35
JOIN US AS FELLOW AUSSIES AND SHARE OUR TRADITIONS AND CULTURE AS THE
MIGRANTS OF THE 50S, 60S & 70S DIDAND YOU WILL SHARE OUR FRIENDSHIP,
Page 3
RESPECT AND THE MOST WONDERFUL COUNTRY ON EARTH THAT WE CREATED.
ABC backs host after slur anger (Courier Mail 24-4) that is what we have come to expect from
Australias let-wing junk broadcaster giving tacit approval of the ANZAC slur from Yassmin Abdel-
5 Magied, who labels herself first and foremost.Muslim. Such is ample evidence she is not
suited to remain in Australia, all migrants must declare, commit and display that Australia comes first
at all times. She admits she will put Islam before her defence of Australia that constitutes potential
treasonYou either love it or leave it, please leave promptly as you show no loyalty, our welcome is
withdrawn.
10 END QUOTE
QUOTE
FW: My Bloody Oath its time
People
15 governor@cqfreestate.com
Today at 7:19 (28-4-2017)
To
COINSPACE CREW
20 AUSSIE PATRIOTS
CHURCH MILITANTS
Hide
Message body
25 FYI
From: allankingston <allan.kingston@westnet.com.au>
Date: Friday, 28 April 2017 at 12:45 am
To: Allan Kingston <allan.kingston@westnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: My Bloody Oath its time
30 On 27 Apr 2017, at 4:23 PM, MAX BOLTE <maxbolte9@gmail.com> wrote:
We were never asked. We were never asked to take in migrants after WW2. Most Greeks and Italians have
made a good contribution - leave aside the mafia-linked Calabrians and Sicilians ( remember the murder of
good Australian Donald MacKay and dozens of of others ). We were never asked about letting in the
Zionist Jews after WW2 ( some of them - machine gun toting murderers of peaceful Palestinians and
35 expendable British soldiers - funded and rewarded by the mass murdering Rothschilds ). We were never
asked by the Liberal Party if we wanted the White Australia Policy scrapped. We were never asked by
Malcolm Fraser if we wanted the Lebanese Muslims to come to Australia ( their presence now a potential
near future civil war) - did you hear about the electrician who came across a room full of AK47s in a
Sydney mosque - by the time the police got there a few weeks later they were gone.
40 On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:14 PM, George Gault <georgegault4@gmail.com> wrote:
Its about time we Assies voted for a leader that put the dinky di first and foremost. Good on you
Kookaburras stand tall for your flag. George
From: Luciana [mailto:truluc@optusnet.com.au]

Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2017 11:16 AM
45 To: Bev Pattenden; Werner Schmidlin; George Gault; healthachievers Marg
Subject: My Bloody Oath
Importance: High
FYI: Oh Hum!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
50 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Subject: My Bloody Oath

Page 4
MY BLOODY OATH!
Below is a letter passed onto me by another "True Blue Aussie".
Read the letter and if you say "My Bloody Oath" afterwards, then you are truly an Australian.
5 Letter to the Editor and every Australian, by the True Blue Aussie.
So many letter writers have explained how this land is made up of immigrants. Maybe we should turn to our
history books and point out to people why today's Australian is not willing to accept the new kind of
immigrant any longer.
Back in the 1900s (after federation) when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to Australia,
10 people had to disembark a ship and stand in a long line in Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth and be
documented.
Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground.
They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times.
They made learning English a primary rule in their new Australian households and some even changed their
15 names to blend in with their new home.
They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their
power to help their children assimilate into one culture.
Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labour laws to protect them. All they had were
the skills, craftsmanship and desire they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.
20 Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out.
Australians fought alongside men whose parents had come straight over from Germany, Italy, France, Japan,
Czechoslovakia, Russia, Sweden, Poland and so any other places.
None of these first generation Australians ever gave any thought about what country from which their parents
had come.
25 They were Australians fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the
Freedom as one people.
When we liberated France, no-one in those villages was looking for the Ukrainian-Australian or the German-
Australian or the Irish-Australian.
The people of France saw only Australians and we carried one flag that represented our country.
30 Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to
represent who they were.
It would have been a disgrace to their parents that had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly
knew what it meant to be an Australian.
Here we are in 2017 with a new kind of immigrant that wants the same rights and privileges, but not to learn
35 or speak English. They want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes an
Australian passport and a guarantee of being faithful to their country of origin.

Page 5
That's not what being an Australian is all about!!!!
Australians have been very open-hearted and open-minded toward immigrants, whether they were fleeing
poverty, dictatorship, persecution or whatever else forced these people to flee their homeland and to those
people who truly did ADOPT our country, our flag, our morals and our customs, and left their wars, hatred
5 and divisions behind.
I believe the immigrants that landed in Australia in the early 1900s would be appalled the country they
created is being used and abused by those waving foreign country flags, fighting foreign battles on our soil,
making Australians change to suit their religions and cultures and wanting to change our country's fabric by
claiming discrimination when we do not give in to their demands. Our forefathers deserve better than that for
10 the toil, hard work and sacrifices they made for the future of this country.
It's about time we get real and stand up for our rights, we are AUSTRALIANS!
Lest we forget it!!!
NO MORE POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. NO MORE not saying CHRISTMAS in our stores and in our
schools. (This country is and always has been based on Christian ideals!) I eat pork, I drink beer and I want
15 my Australia back!
Hope this letter is read by millions of people all across Australia and Aussies living overseas.
PS Please pass this on to everyone you know to help ensure our country is not taken over by radical non-
Australians!!!
KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING!!
20 END QUOTE
Below I will also allude to a possible reason that may have or may not have affected the driver,
as we are seeing an considerable escalation of road-rage in general and we need to address this
issue as to why more and more people decent into road-rage very quickly where ordinary they
25 could be very upstanding persons well respected in both public and private lives.
.
At my age, in a few weeks being 70 many a person seem to associate my rounding as a beer
drinker, but reality is I do not consume alcohol as my favourite drink is coffee. As such people
tend to assume something and may totally misconceived the real reasons. I assume that it may
30 rather have to do with the toxins we consume as preservatives in our daily food.
We have a so called escalation of children being deemed to be suffering mental health problems
and well we just pump them full with medication, where as some reports suggest it may be
totally unrelated to this issue but have different causes.
Obviously not being a person with any medical education nor holding any certificates in such
35 fields I rather rely upon what politicians state versus what the medical profession claims. And
well below I will quote what a politician stated versus the medical profession. After all the
question is was the driver perhaps and more than likely unbeknown to himself affected but had
absolutely no reason to be aware of this? If this might have been a contributing factor then surely
it must be explored if and to what extend it might have been. After all if it is exposed and
40 appropriately attended upon then we might also be able to reduce a lot of the road-rage going
on. We cannot bring back the death but we certainly can seek to avoid their deaths being in vein
and all the corner might do is to seek to shield the guilty ones, whomever it might be.
.
So to say strap on your seatbelt and go along for the ride because it will be a bit of a trip to read
45 through all the material I refer to below. As I will publish this part of the submission also on my

Page 6
blog I can assure you that people might read it and perhaps start to consider what if any issues
may cause the escalation of road-rage, etc.
Considering the flurry about Yassmin Abdel-Magied comments and her alleged support of
5 Islam above that of the constitution, and so while being on the taxpayers pay role we need to
consider the effect her comments may have upon others and what this is about our constitutional
embedded Religious Liberty:
QUOTE
Where are the Moderate Muslims?
10 People
Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>
29 Apr at 2:53 PM (20170430)

To
15 Jim
Hide
Message body
somegreatbloke
If Islam is a religion of peace then wouldn't an extremist be extremely peaceful?
20 Muhammad was a mentally ill narcissist, paedophile and war criminal with a messianic complex. He traded
in slaves, and was responsible for the killing of many people, including women and children.....oh, and don't
forget that according to Allah himself (speaking through Muhammad, of course) Muhammad is the most
"beautiful pattern of conduct" and "example" for mankind to follow! (Qur'an 33:21), as well as the "exalted
standard of character" (Qur'an 68:4).
25 Jesus:
Luke 6:27 -- But I say to you who hear, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you".
Matthew 5:43-48 -- You have heard that it was said, You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.
But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your
Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and
30 on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors
do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the
Gentiles do the same?".
Matthew 26:52 -- "But Jesus said to him, Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish
by the sword". (Jesus said this after Peter had struck one of the soldiers who were attempting to arrest Jesus.
35 Jesus subsequently healed the soldier's wound).
Romans 12:17-21 -- "Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of
everybody. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone".
1 Peter 3:9 -- "Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult, but with blessing, because to this you were
called so that you may inherit a blessing".
40
1 John 2:9-10 -- "Anyone who claims to be in the light but hates his brother is still in the darkness. Whoever
loves his brother lives in the light, and there is nothing in him to make him stumble".
----------
Muhammad:

Page 7
Quran 2:191 -- "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove
you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter... and fight them until fitnah is no more, and religion is for
Allah."
Quran 4:76 -- "Those who believe, fight in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of
5 Satan. So fight you against the friends of Satan. Ever feeble indeed is the plot of Satan."
Quran 4:89 -- "They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take
from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and
kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper."
Quran 8:12 -- "[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, "I am with you, so strengthen those who
10 have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and
strike from them every fingertip."
Quran 8:39 -- "And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah . And if
they cease - then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do."
Quran 9:29 -- "Fight those who believe not in Allah or the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which has been
15 forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the
Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission and are subdued."
Quran 9:3 -- "And a declaration should be made from Allah and His Messenger to these people on the day of
the great Hajj that Allah is free from [all] obligations to these Idolaters and so is His Messenger. So if you [O
Idolaters!] repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away, then know that you cannot escape from the grasp
20 of Allah. And give tidings [O Muhammad] of a painful torment to these disbelievers. Except those of these
Idolaters with whom you have a treaty, and who have not shown treachery in it nor have supported anyone
against you. So fulfill their treaty to the end of their term. Indeed, Allah loves those who abide by the limits.
Then when the sacred months [after the Hajj] have passed, kill these Idolaters wherever you find them, and
capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush. But if they repent and
25 establish the prayer, and give Zakah, then leave them alone. Indeed, Allah is Ever Forgiving, Most Merciful."
Quran 33:60-62 -- "If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease and those who spread rumors in al-
Madinah do not cease, We will surely incite you against them; then they will not remain your neighbors
therein except for a little. Accursed wherever they are found, [being] seized and massacred completely. [This
is] the established way of Allah with those who passed on before; and you will not find in the way of Allah
30 any change."
----------
Sir Winston Churchill: (First of only eight people to be made an honorary citizen of the United States,
receiver of the Army Distinguished Service Medal, and Noble Prize winner.)
35 "The influence of Islam paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force
exists in the world."
"The Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. The civilisation of
modern Europe might fall. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been
subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness."
40 "Islam is as dangerous in a man as rabies in a dog."
----------
Everyone who defends Muslims, saying things like "These are just the extremists blah blah blah", don't
understand Islam. These are not the "Extremists" they are just following true Islam. The so-called
Page 8
"Moderates" are simply not fully practicing their religion. Saying there are good Muslims, who aren't
terrorists, is just like saying there are KKK members, who haven't lynched any black people, or there were
some Nazis that didn't kill any Jews. These ISIS/terrorists are simply following in Muhammad's footsteps,
and are the true face of Islam, the "religion of peace".
5 I don't believe there are 'moderate Muslims', just apathetic ones who tacitly consent to the extremist ones!
A moderate Muslim is a lazy jihadist that is out of ammunition.
----------
In 2016, the Islamic State beheaded a 14-year-old boy in front of his parents for missing prayers. This was
consistent with Muhammad's order to burn those who would not pray (along with their houses), which he
10 issued near the end of his life. When this happened, there was barely a peep of protest from the Muslim
world.
At the end of the day, even Muslims who insist that the mandate to kill apostates from Islam isn't a part of the
"true" religion never appear all that bothered when it does happen - much less champion the right of other
religions to evangelize in Muslim countries; in fact, they discourage it. They know as well as anyone that
15 Islam cannot compete within the arena of free ideas and must rely on brute force at some level to retain
believers.
I can "cherrypick" verses from the Quran and the Bible all day long...in the end we better take a look at the
fruits of religions, and the legacy of their followers.....let's compare Islam and Christianity:
- Muslims want to escape from Muslim countries to Western (Christian) countries.
20 - Madrassahs that indoctrinate Muslim children with bigotry and terror vs. Mission schools that teach reading
and writing to Christians and Muslims alike.
- Suicide bombings for Allah - International terror organizations vs. international charities.
- No formal charities for non-Muslims vs. leading provider of disaster relief to Muslims.
- Murder of aid workers vs. supply of aid workers - Christians in jail for apostasy or blasphemy vs. religious
25 freedom.
- Modern-day slavery in the name of Islam vs. abolition in the name of Christianity.
- Muslim clerics who engage in or condone terrorism vs. Christian clerics murdered each year by terror
groups rife with Muslim clerics.
- Daily religious violence against Hindus, Jews, Buddhists, and Muslims by Muslims.
30 - Ritual slitting of animals' throats vs. ending of animal sacrifice.
- Religion vs. Technology & Medicine - Censorship vs. freedom of speech.
- Intolerance for criticism of Islam vs. tolerance for religious dissent.
- Restricting other religions from preaching faith vs. allowing all religions the same right to evangelize.
- Conversions allowed to Islam only vs. freedom of conscience.
35 - Converts to Christianity beheaded vs. no dead converts to Islam.
That's the reality.

Page 9
From: governor@cqfreestate.com [mailto:governor@cqfreestate.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 12:07 PM
Cc: AUSSIE PATRIOTS; COINSPACE CREW; PAULINE HANSON; CHURCH MILITANTS
Subject: FW: Where are moderate Muslims? FIVE MINUTE FILM
5 Where Are the Moderate Muslims?
Published on 27 Apr 2017
After every terrorist attack, politicians and pundits reassure us that the atrocity does not represent the true
beliefs of the "moderate Muslim majority." But how many moderates are there? And what exactly does
"moderate" mean? Military instructor and researcher Hussein Aboubakr explains.
10 (Video duration: 5:47 min.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Enx4XxO1E
__________
Date: 29 April 2017 at 11:15:57 am AEST

To: rita.panahi@news.com.au, rebekah.cavanagh@news.com.au, rodneyculleton@gmail.com,
15 senator.rice@aph.gov.au, senator.joyce@aph.gov.au, Jacqualine Lambie <senator.lambie@aph.gov.au>,
Sharon.firebrace01@bigpond.com, senator.fifield@aph.gov.au, simon.chamberlain@aph.gov.au,
senator.dinatale@aph.gov.au, senator.marshall@aph.gov.au, senator.carr@aph.gov.au,
senator.mckenzie@aph.gov.au, senator.collins@aph.gov.au, senator.ryan@aph.gov.au,
senator.xenophon@aph.gov.au, senator.culleton@aph.gov.au, senator.conroy@aph.gov.au,
20 tom.elliott@macquariemedia.com.au, tim.mccurdy@parliament.vic.gov.au, ssvc1@bigpond.com,
worldteam7@gmail.com, David Hutt <david.hutt@acl.org.au>, andrew.bolt@news.com.au,
anthony.keane@news.com.au, admin@ccw.org.au, bsalt@kpmg.com.au, belgiumbrugge@yahoo.com,
cory@corybernardi.com, cathy.mcgowan.mp@aph.gov.au, menzies@aph.gov.au, fullerton.ticky@abc.net.au,
Fred Nile <fred.nile@parliament.nsw.gov.au>, fiona.byrne@news.com.au, f.nile@parliament.nsw.gov.au,
25 gary.blackwood@parliament.vic.gov.au, greg.stolz@news.com.au, Paul Hansen
<p.hansen@wangaratta.vic.gov.au>, john.masanauskas@news.com.au, kylie.else@news.com.au,
phanson@datawave.net.au, phillippa.butt@news.com.au
Subject: Fwd: Where are moderate Muslims? FIVE MINUTE FILM.
Since your politician wouldn't know this about ISLAM,..spend 5 minutes showing them this 5 minute
30 you tube on ISLAM for just 5 minutes..., they may catch on.
END QUOTE
Because the unbeliever is aimed at anyone who doesnt follow Islam and also may be directed
to some extend against Muslims who according to others may not live their kind of Islamic
35 lifestyle, it should be clear that the alleged comments of Yassmin Abdel-Magied undermined
our rule of law and I view the Federal government is weak to allow this to go on without
taking appropriate action. After all Islam is in my view not just a religion but deals with
governance and military issues and as such I understand within the Crimes Act (Cth) it is an
offence to undermine the government. Where then the Government of the Day does nothing and
40 allows her to promote Islam to be above the constitution, or to that kind of view, then many a
person who have Islam as part of their religion may gain the view they can disregard Australian
law upon their own unilateral views, and by this innocent people can end up being harmed.
QUOTE
45 FW: Muslims Demand Trump Do One Thing For Them NOW Or Theyll Leave U.S...
People
governor@cqfreestate.com
Today at 7:37 (28-4-2017)

Page 10
CC
AUSSIE PATRIOTS
COINSPACE CREW
CHURCH MILITANTS
5 Hide
Message body
FYI
Apparently these clowns somehow believe that they are Allah's gift to Humanity. Good riddance! And some
10 Libtard idiots want them to remain here to kill Americans once they get their Shariah Law established
here....Can anyone say, "INSANITY" in addition to this Reporter?
Bob J
Muslims Demand Trump Do One Thing For Them NOW Or Theyll Leave U.S. Mass Muslim
Exodus Coming!
15 By Al Waisman
http://freedomdaily.com/muslims-demand-trump-one-thing-now-theyll-leave-u-s-mass-muslim-exodus-
coming/
The worlds Muslim Refugees have sent President Donald Trump a stern and harsh warning. They have
made it extremely clear to that if the US government bans sharia law, they will leave the United States of
20 America for good.
Yes, you read that correctly. The same people who are are invading our great nation, and many other
freedom-loving nations, have taken it upon themselves to make it extremely clear that they will only follow
one type of law. None other than their own barbaric Sharia Law. They have given the US government and
president Trump an ultimatum, which if not met, will result in them packing up and leaving our great
25 freedom loving nation.
As of late in the Netherlands, amid a stunning TV portion about a new group of Syrian vagrants, a Dutch
TV columnist moved toward the Syrians subsequent to discovering that they were dozing outside in dissent
of the conditions they were living in.
This is not an existence when you get inside to a room without a TV. Only a bed, there is no refrigerator,
30 no lockers, no protection, gushed an English-speaking Syrian lady with colored red hair and more
pleasant garments than one may hope to see on an evacuee.
Will remain outside on the grounds that we would prefer not to eat this sustenance, and we would prefer
not to remain in the room. Were fleeing from our nation as a result of the circumstance, and now we live in
a correctional facility, the lady proceeded, clearly disturbed by the cutting edge, safe living condition
35 gave at citizen cost.
Among others interviewed, many additionally added that they wish to see the laws of their country executed
into their new home. We require Sharia Law all together for our group to develop and thrive in our new
homes in Europe
The following morning, the correspondent conversed with her once more, and she stayed immovable in her
40 dissent of such brutal living conditions. She even griped about the remittance they were accepting cordiality
of the legislature of the Netherlands.
She told the staggered correspondent that she thought theyd be in an ideal situation backpedaling to their
Islamic State-swarmed Syrian country.

Page 11
Here, it is not an existence. There, we know there is a war, however here there is no life. You are staying
here in prison. Its a similar circumstance, yet in Syria, you can live without a doubt. They are giving us
only 10 to 12 Euro (seven days). Its not genuine, she griped.
So let me get this straight. You flee from a worn-torn Islamic cesspool of a nation where people are being
5 beheaded, raped and blown up left and right, you come to our country, and if you dont get your way you
pull a temper tantrum and threaten to leave if us Americans dont allow your lifestyle into our civilized
culture? Really?
You would think this is an outrageous demand and that all us Americans, would just smile, wave and say
Well Bye. Umm, no, dont forget we have a mental disorder in our great nation. A mental disorder which
10 started after World War 2 when our institutions of higher learning were infiltrated by the communists in
order to indoctrinate our youth and break us from the inside. A practice which has gotten more and more
prominent over time and has now reached an all-time high where they dont even bother to hide or mask it
anymore. That disorder, because it needs constant rebranding, is today being called Liberalism. Led and
forwarded by the so-called tolerant and pro-diversity American left.
15 Breitbart Reported:
The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results
show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate
response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% agreed that Muslims in America should have
the choice of being governed according to shariah.
20 According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that Muslims in America
should have the choice of being governed according to shariah. When that question was put to the
broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S.
Constitution (86% to 2%).
Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, It is legitimate
25 to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet
Mohammed.
A full 25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States can be
justified as part of the global jihad.
For those who dont know, Sharia Law is nothing less than the Nazi-ification of a religion. Sharia
30 authorizes murder against non-believers who wont convert, horrific oppression of women, the execution of
gays, the extermination of Jews, and the beheading of anyone who draws Muhammad.
They want to bow and give the Muslims everything they want because you know, Diversity and
Tolerance. Never once ever bothering to care about our very survival of our great and free nation.
(image not included)
35 Al Waisman
Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any
other Republican since 1984. Hes worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications
director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has
also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice
40 President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the
California Republican Party for almost a decade.
END QUOTE
By no means it are not just people of certain religions that argue the rule of law doesnt apply to
45 them. Regrettably they have read some sentence on a judgment and then in my view grossly
Page 12
misinterpret it. Actually the same is regarding the issue of conscription referred to in the
constitution. It relates only to that members of the medical profession cannot be conscripted by
the Federal Government in regard of Health care issues. The Framers of the Constitution
anticipated compulsory service for the military, etc.
5
I included (below) the entire email as not to take it out of context what I wrote.
QUOTE
Re: Some further guidance re. the legal system.
10 People
Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>

25 Apr at 11:20 PM
To
15 Jim
Hide
CC
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Hide
20 Message body
Jim,
CRUDEN v. NEALE 2 NC 338
25 QUOTE
When a change of government takes place, from a monarchical to a republican government, the old
form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not chuse to become members of the new,
437
30 had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the society subject to
the old government, they had not entered into any engagement to become subject to any new form the
majority might think proper to adopt. That tile majority shall prevail, is a rule posterior to the formation of
government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There,
every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed
35 by nature.He is not bound by any institutions
(339)
formed by his fellow-men without his consent.
END QUOTE
40 What this in my view means is that if you do not go to live in a certain country then the laws of that country
cannot be enforced against you. If you reside in Victoria and never go to say Western Australia then Western
Australia laws cannot be used against you. This, as you have not consented directly or implied to be subjected
to the laws of Western Australia. If however if you are living in the State of Victoria then you have subjected
yourself to the laws of the State of Victoria and consented by this to be subject to the laws of the State of
45 Victoria. As such it is not, as many argue, that if you live in a particular State you can disregard the laws of
that State because you do not give specific authority, this as by living in the State you have implied given
your consent to be subjected to the laws of that state.
.
If you do not wish to consent to the laws of a State then you are free to move elsewhere.
50
I am aware that often people claim they can disregard laws of the State they reside in because of this case,
but the truth is that the judgment doesn't appear to claim this at all. In that case the person removed himself
from the State because not desiring to be part of the new government!

Page 13
Again
QUOTE
When a change of government takes place, from a monarchical to a republican government, the old
form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not chuse to become members of the new,
5 437
had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere.
END QUOTE
It makes it very clear that when there is a republic the old constitution is gone.Yet, in Australia we hear
10 politicians going on about a republic and yet never promoting a republican constitution,. As such they want to
create a dictatorship.
Gerrit
15
Constitutionalist & Consultant
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN
20 (OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia
Ph (International) 61394577209
.
Email; inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
25
The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE, unless specifically
otherwise stated.
If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need to do is to consider the
30 content appropriately!
A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING CONCERNED
TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
35
From: Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>
To: Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au>
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2017, 17:28
Subject: Some further guidance re. the legal system.
40
From: Mark B [mailto:underthewire4me@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:06 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Fwd: I have deleted the couple of controversial FB posts
45
Worldwide - the authorities are pursuing people claiming to be sovereigns or sovereign people, and for good
reason because people are not sovereign.
50 They may be suveran - if they know themselves who they really are. Most of course don't.
As for a lawyer, they are being very well prepared by the system for mind numbing brainwashing.
No offense but lawyers believe statute, acts, codes and legislation is the law.
55
Nothing is further from the truth. These man made codification of higher principles are ONLY colour of law.
However, am overwhelmed already with assisting people, so really have no time to entertain a debate.
60 Your friend can google Cruden V Neale 1796. It says it all.
Man is NOT subject to ANY law other than natural law.

Page 14
However, if you are anything BUT a man, a creature of statute, such as a person, citizen or resident, then of
course the colour of law applies to you because your have declared yourself a colourable people, being a
person.
5
Look up any law dictionary what the LEGAL definition of a person, citizen or resident is.
Is there in black & white.
10 cheers
---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Ben Musgrave <ben.musgrave@gmail.com>
15 Date: 24 April 2017 at 18:59
Subject: Re: FW: FYI - I have deleted the couple of controversial FB posts
To: Jeffrey Hodges <sportsmind@bigpond.com>
Hi Jeffrey,
20
I'm pretty sure he's not on to something at all !
Here is a good article that covers the movement from whence he gets his approach:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement
25
In 2012 the Canadian Queens Bench judge J.D. Rooke A C J made a land mark decision in regards to how
those approaches and theories are not valid.
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html
30 This is a reader friendly transcript of the judgement:

https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughLibertarianSpam/comments/2kq632/remember_that_canadian_judgement_b
lasting/
In Australia the NSW police are considering them a terrorist threat:

35 " Thomas, James; McGregor, Jeanavive (30 November 2015). "Sovereign citizens: Terrorism assessment
warns of rising threat from anti-government extremists". ABC News. Retrieved 30 November 2015."
Extract from the wikipedia article:

In Australia there have been a few minor cases where parties have invoked arguments surrounding the
40 'sovereign man'.[43] All of these arguments have failed before Australian courts. The courts in New Zealand
also appear to have rejected the 'sovereign man' arguments.[44]
What are his legal qualifications Jeffrey? I don't want to go damning the man out of hand as I am still only a
student ...
45
Cheers !
Ben M
50
On 24 April 2017 at 17:32, Jeffrey Hodges <sportsmind@bigpond.com> wrote:
Mate I think he was just sending a quick reply, but not sure if he is on to something or not!
55 Only those who can see the invisible, can achieve the impossible.
Imagine .... Believe .... Fly!
Yours faithfully,
60 Jeffrey Hodges B.Sc. M.Sc.(Hons) B.Ed.

Director, Sportsmind Institute
77 Flaxton Mill Road, FLAXTON. QLD. 4560.

Page 15
For information about Sportsmind see www.sportsmind.com.au
or call me on 07 5445 7994
5 On 24 April 2017 at 13:14, Jeffrey Hodges <sportsmind@bigpond.com> wrote:
Marks reply .
10 From: Mark B [mailto:underthewire4me@gmail.com]

Sent: Monday, 24 April 2017 12:17 PM
To: Jeffrey Hodges
Subject: Re: FW: FYI - I have deleted the couple of controversial FB posts
15 Hi Jeff. Have answered below
Thanks, Jeffrey
20 From: Ben Musgrave [mailto:ben.musgrave@gmail.com]

Sent: Monday, 24 April 2017 11:14 AM
To: Jeffrey Hodges
Subject: Re: FYI - I have deleted the couple of controversial FB posts
25 Hi Jeffrey,
I know some of what he is saying, but he is taking the path of the "Sovereign Entity" which courts are
recognising and discounting these days. Correct and for very good reason.
30 1. We subvert our status by lying. When we say we are sovereign, you only need look at the legal definition
of the word "sovereign" & you will. We are far from sovereigns. We do not have a castle, our own currency,
a standing army, are not a Prince or King, are NOT underlings amongst other things. We are suveran -
overloads. Try finding that in any legal dictionary. Has been long ago sanitised - just as allodial title and other
words relating to substance - private, and
35
2. The public cannot "see" the private. A Judge/Magistrate/Justice? Registrar cannot see a man. No point
stating you're a man in court as the Judge will tell you to get the hell out of there. A Judge is a construction of
the mind, a legal title or legal fiction. Hence one cannot mix truth with fiction without adulterating the truth.
To speak in a fictional realm of a court, you must speak in "colourable" language.
40
Examples of wins, but they don't set case law, is three successive wins, each in a different Magistrates Court
in Qld, with Peter W, who is being targeted by the poolice and had his $120,000 car garnished & impunded
with a demand for $5,000 for its release, all resulting from (false) charges of unlicensed driving, obstructing
poolice, etc. etc. where in ALL cases, the charges were with drawn by the prosecutor IN COURT.
45
He is still before the court - 29th May for a 4th SET of 5 charges (4 of them dismissed on the last hearing on
2nd April), the 5th charge of .050 (inaccurate reading by virtue of the chemicals he works with) will also be
dismissed.
50 However, a solicitor cannot use these processes because a solicitor is again a mind construct, a title, in the
fictional realm and therefore MUST abide by statute.
We are LIVING BEINGS and NOT subject to statute but by the Creator's laws. The courts recognise this,
albeit in a colourful way.
55
False charges?
1. How can one drive a "vehicle" - a creature of statute, (I have a car) UNLESS one owns a horse and a
buggy or a cart?
60

Page 16
2. Failure to prove the entity name on any infringement or charge sheet is you. Did you give the informant
that property? NOOOOO, He/she made it up from having "converted" your property - your name. Is called
"fabricating evidence" and "obtaining info. for purposes of (them) committing an indictable offence s 408
(D0 Qld Criminal Code Act 1899):
5 3. False arrest
4. Breach of the peace
5. Threats with menace
6. Assualt, maybe even serious assault
10 and lots more. People need to know the rules of the game. We operate out of equity, Qld Judicature Act 1876
s 5(11) - tells which of Rules Equity, the Common Law, or Statute prevail. Is very clear there are ONLY two
laws: Equity & Common Law.
cheers
15 ---
This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally
privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email. If you have
received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorized
20 disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability.
END QUOTE
It should be clear that persons of all kind (not just of any particular religious views) are
challenging the rule of law. While there is nothing strange about challenging the rule of law, for
25 example in appeals, it is as to if the issues/grounds relied upon are legitimate or not. And it
doesnt stop there, as lawyers too often ill advice their clients. If doctors in the medical
profession were as often wrong as lawyers were then they would be called charlatans.
Charlatan | Define Charlatan at Dictionary.com
30 www.dictionary.com/browse/charlatan
noun. 1. a person who pretends or claims to have more knowledge or skill than he or she possesses; quack.
Origin of charlatan. Middle French.
When you have 100 hundred cases before the court where each party is represented by a legal
35 team and each case is ultimately decided by a judge. Then 100 parties are found to be in the
wrong and 100 parties succeed. Meaning 100 sets of lawyers or 50% of the total legal teams are
found to be in the wrong. If doctors were losing 50% of their patients in operations they more
than likely would be denied to continue a medical practice.
The problem we then have is that people who lost their case but acted in good faith on the legal
40 advice of their legal team then nevertheless cop likely a hefty bill from the opponent and so from
his own lawyers even so they wrongly advised him.
When then a person loses say his house to pay the legal bills and this all having acted on legal
advice then surely this to can trigger a person to become aggrieved to such extend as to wanting
to have some sort of revenge against whomever.
45
My assistance was requested with a property issue where a woman being the proprietor claimed
that her neighbour had moved the fence onto her property to steal part of her land. Council
inspectors made clear the woman was in the wrong as they had inspected the property and the
neighbour who had built his own house to be in accordance with the plans they had approved and
50 subsequently inspected. Councils lawyer made clear the woman was totally in the wrong.
Nevertheless I urged the lawyer to let me check the files and get some copies of the file. The
lawyer instructed an office assistant to give me copies of documents I wanted. So I then
requested a copy of the entire file. I was provided with it. I then went through the file and it
seemed to me that everyone seemed to make the same error. That is the house was built on a
55 slope and the distance was to be a certain measure from the public footpath. What the builder and
the council inspectors had done was all make the identical error to measure the distance down the
slope rather than in a horizontal manner. By this the house was built to close to the footpath but
Page 17
also by the angle of the property boundary to close to the fence. Hence the builder had
demolished the fence and rebuild it further onto the land of the neighbour to pretend the correct
distance was maintained from the shared fence. And this is just an example how people are
wronged and often very aggrieved and then at times may end up taking the law into their own
5 hands to try to correct a wrong against them when others, including lawyers, refuse to be open
minded to consider all relevant issues.
One has to ask: What did occur before the Bourke Street carnage that led to the driver ending up
in Bourke Street in the condition he was? Could the vehicle have been immobilised long before it
10 but the Police simply didnt want to bother and then when finally trying to move the driver from
Swanston and Flinders Streets intersection then grossly under estimated the consequences that
could flow from not arresting him.
Whenever a person gets involved in a criminal act and (as I understand was reported regarding
15 Bourke Street carnage) a person allegedly refers to a particular religion one has to address this
issue. After all if a person fails to understand/comprehend what was wrong in the conduct
accused off then no rehabilitation could ever succeed. It means the public would remain at risk if
the person, if convicted, later was released. Hence my previous writings that I view parole should
be after completing a sentence so that any person failing for example to recognise any
20 wrongdoing convicted for then remains within the control of the authorities, whereas in the
present system a parole is within the terms to be served and if the convicted criminal refuses to
go on parole and then is released at the end of the term the authorities have nothing to maintain a
check upon such person.
.
25 As Peta Credlin former staff member of former Prime Minister Tony Abbott stated as stated
below, and considering the way police was criticised at the time for doing its job versus the drug
problem we are now facing we may too need to question the role of the judiciary in it all. This
after all if the judiciary was to have been less eager so to say to let law breakers off the hook
our5 drug problems of today may have to some extent having been avoided. :
30
QUOTE
Peta Credlin: Muslim polygamy bedded down by PC bureaucrats.
People
35
Today at 14:41
To
Jim
Hide
40 Photos
image003.jpg
image006.jpg
image008.jpg
Message body
45 An excerpt of "The Rise of Middle Eastern Crime Gangs" By Tim Priest.
In the early 1980s, as a young detective I was attached to the Drug Squad at the old CIB. I remember
executing a search warrant at Croydon, where we found nearly a pound of heroin. I know that now
sounds very familiar; however, what set this heroin apart was that it was Beaker Valley Heroin,
markedly different from any heroin I had seen. Number Four heroin from the golden triangle of South
50 East Asia is nearly always off white, almost pure diamorphine. This heroin was almost brown.
But more remarkable were the occupants of the house. They were very recent arrivals from Lebanon,
and from the moment we entered the premises, we wrestled and fought with the male occupants, were

Page 18
abused and spat at by the women and children, and our search took five times longer because of the
impediments placed before us by the occupants, including the women hiding heroin in baby nappies
and on themselves and refusing to be searched by policewomen because of religious beliefs. We had
never encountered these problems before.
5
As was the case in those days, we arrested every adult and teenager who had hampered our search.
When it came to court, they were represented by Legal Aid, of course, who claimed that these people
were innocent of the minor charges of public disorder and hindering police, because they were recent
arrivals from a country where people have an historical hatred towards police, and that they also had
10 poor communications skills and that the police had not executed the warrant in a manner that was
acceptable to the Muslim occupants.
The magistrate, well known to police as one who convicted fewer than one in ten offenders brought
before him during his term at Burwood local court, threw the matter out, siding with the occupants
15 and condemning the police. I remember thinking; thank heavens we don't run into many Lebanese
drug dealers. -- Jason
From: RAY PLATT [mailto:rayplatt@iinet.net.au]

20 Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:45 AM
Subject: Fwd: FW: Peta Credlin - There cannot, there must not be, two laws in Australia.
PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS FAR AND WIDE.
25 WE NEED A LOT MORE LIKE PETA CREDLIN IN ALL AREAS OF POLITICS AND ALL
REPORTING SERVICES ------ WHERE THEY TELL THE REAL TRUTH AS IT REALLY IS
RAY PLATT
30 ----- Original Message -----

From: "Allan Snow" <allansnow@bigpond.com>
To: "RAY PLATT" <rayplatt@iinet.net.au>
Sent: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:11:30 +1000
Subject: FW: Peta Credlin - There cannot, there must not be, two laws in Australia.
35
In the paper over the W/end, Peta Credlin said she was emphatically not interested in politics.
After reading many of her columns in C/Mail, I am disappointed as she seems to have an excellent
knowledge to help clean up the mess that is Canberra after 10 years of less than impressive
40 progress?!
Des.
45 Sent: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 8:39 AM

Subject: Peta Credlin - There cannot, there must not be, two laws in Australia.
When politicians and lawyers do not stand up for our laws and enforce them, what hope has our
50 country! Worth the read.......
Peta Credlin - There cannot, there must not be two laws in Australia.
Peta-Louise Mary Credlin (born 23 March 1971) is an Australian political adviser who served as chief of
55 staff to former Prime Minister Tony Abbott from September 2013 to September 2015, and previously
as chief of staff to Abbott as Leader of the Opposition. She currently writes for The Sunday Telegraph
and appears regularly on Sky News (see the end of the article).
More proof the media will not report the truth or expose un-Australian activities.
60
Peta Credlin: Muslim polygamy bedded down by PC bureaucrats

Page 19
The Daily Telegraph
PETA CREDLIN, The Sunday Telegraph
December 11, 2016 12:00am
5 I LIKE to think growing up in a small country town gave me a good grounding in the fundamentals
because Middle Australia is a place where commonsense is still (thankfully) common, people work
hard, right is right and wrong is wrong.
I used to think everywhere else was the same too but 16 years working in politics threw that idea out
10 the window.
Not only are we fast becoming a nation where a small few like to lecture the majority, were also
being taken for a ride by a growing number of people who exploit the benefits and goodwill of the very
country they might live in, but refuse to join.
15
Worse still, when anyone tries to call this out as not being the Australian way, theyre branded
unAustralian, told theyre racist, intolerant or worse.
Moutia Elzahed has refused to take her burqa off to give evidence in a court case.
20
I always thought that the great battles in human rights were fought around the inalienable principle
that were all equal regardless of race, gender, class or sexuality.
Yet now, in this age of identity politics, your difference is what matters rather than your common
25 humanity.
Take the case this week of Moutia Elzahed, who is suing police for alleged brutality resulting from
counter-terrorism raids that took place in Sydney in 2014.
30 This court case alone is a case study in how far we have gone down the path of junking the very
foundations our society was built on.
In court this week, Mrs Elzahed (and well get to the Mrs in a moment) refused to take off her full-face veil
to give evidence despite the fact she had initiated the legal action.
35
The judge hearing the case, NSW District Court Justice Audrey Balla, offered other options for her to
give evidence in a more private setting but all required her face to be shown because, rightly, Balla
affirmed the long-held principle that facial expressions are a key tool used by the court in assessing the
truthfulness of a witness testimony.
40
Despite the concessions, Moutia Elzahed still refused to remove her veil and also refused to stand when the
judge entered the room because, as her legal counsel explained, she stood only for Allah.
Yes, youve got it right; Moutia Elzahed was trying to make use of the very legal system she refused to
45 respect. Justice Balla made it crystal clear she wouldnt tolerate disrespect in her court and she was backed up
by the NSW Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton.
Moutia Elzahed is not a lone case of courtroom disrespect. Things have got so bad in NSW that they
passed a special law a year or so ago to deal with the growing numbers of Muslim men (and now
50 women) refusing to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the court and show necessary respect to the bench.
Frankly, its ridiculous that these extremists have been allowed to get away with this nonsense until now.
Sadly, unlike Justice Balla, most of the judges have let it go which is why a special law was passed.
55 Despite this repeated bad behaviour, most of the media like the judges turned a blind eye to the
issue. Youve got to wonder whether this leniency and lack of reporting would have extended to others
treating the court with contempt or whether it was a special concession because they were Muslim, lest
anyone brand them Islamophobic?

Page 20
But it gets worse. Go and look for it yourself, but buried in articles reporting Moutia Elzaheds case is
a reference to the fact that she is one of the two wives of convicted Islamic State terrorism recruiter,
Hamdi Alqudsi.
5 Convicted IS recruiter Hamdi Alqudsi has two wives.
Yes, youve got it right again; not ex-wife, not former wife but one of two wives.
How is it that a line like that passes by most in our media class without comment? This is hardly how
10 we expect women in this country to be treated wheres the womens outrage lobby now?
Many Islamic marriages are, for legal purposes, de facto relationships because they are religious
ceremonies rather than official marriages. But Australian law clearly says marriage can only be a
union between one man and one woman.
15
Sadly, this is not the first time I have seen reference to wives plural. A few years ago I was in a
meeting in Canberra discussing budget reform when our conversation moved to the area of rorts
within the welfare sector and family payments specifically; after all, we spend billions every year
supporting people with children.
20
Slipped into this briefing was acknowledgment by the public service of cases where it was likely that
payments were being provided to families living under one roof with multiple wives. I thought I must
have heard it wrong. So I followed up again.
25
Hamdi Alqudsis two wives leave Parramatta District Court.
No, I got it right the first time. I was informed that it was probably better for the taxpayer anyway
30 because if one wife had to be paid separately she would receive additional support as a single parent.
I couldnt believe what I was told. If it was true, I said, we were accepting as a principle in welfare
policy something that was fundamentally wrong both at law and in our culture pure and simple.
35 No one really disagreed but as is so often the case in Canberra, it was someone elses problem and they
took a few notes.
Straight after the meeting, I raised it with the then prime minister, who found it just as difficult to
believe as I did.
40
He said regardless of the budget argument put forward by the public servants, the principle was
paramount. He demanded more details and action but the leadership change came and the rest is
history.
45 The reporting of the Moutia Elzahed case reminded me of this debate. Worse, it reminded me
that there are just too many places where we are turning a blind eye to changes in our Australian
culture that go against the grain of who we are, and what it is that makes this country one of the best
on earth.
50 Despite the concerted efforts of those who want to define us by our differences, who we are as a people
is just as important as who we are as individuals. And wanting to protect what we have is something
to be proud of, not shut down.
I hope Canberra is listening.

55
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/peta-credlin-muslim-polygamy-bedded-down-by-pc-
bureaucrats/news-story/63d16aa1c4fd872a503bc7cfb829b41d
END QUOTE
60 What is being done is to tell Australians and others that you can only be legally married to one
woman but live in a de facto relationship with further numerous women, as if they are your
Page 21
wives, and collect monies as such. What then is the rule of law if in de facto sharia law is being
applied by the Federal Government?
QUOTE
5 A LITTLE WALK WITH THE WIVES ON VALENTINES DAY.
People
Gil May <gilmay97@gmail.com>
Today at 9:54 (28-4-2017()

10 To
reader@hotmail.com.au
Hide
BCC
inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
15 Hide
Photos
image.png
Message body
20
A LITTLE WALK WITH THE WIVES ON
VALENTINES DAY.
(Love is beautiful)
25 END QUOTE
In my view it is an insult to any woman to be treated as a slave chained to a master and to be sold
for sex, etc. The commonwealth of Australia is a kind of Western society and the Framers of the
Constitution embedded in our constitution that any adult person (see section 41 of the
constitution) who had state franchise in a State could vote in federal elections. This was
30 specifically implemented as women in South Australia had voting rights but not in other States
Page 22
and so the Framers of the Constitution held that where a State provided for equality for women
than federally they had the same rights.
For this any religion of any mind must be subject to the legal principles embedded in the
constitution and derogative conduct towards any woman for being a woman such as claimed in
5 the Islam teaching never can be accepted as to be part of Australian law, let alone above the
constitution. Yet, the Federal government in its own way is giving mixed messages that on the
one hand you can only be legally married to one person but on the other hand having 3 or more
de facto wives is all right. Little wonder we then end up with home-grown terrorist where they
are so to say indoctrinated that Islam is above the constitution and they can disregard any rule of
10 law not to their suiting.
.
When we are dealing with Government honesty let us consider the following emails contents
QUOTE
15 Most dangerous parts of Melbournes CBD revealed
People
Today at 16:38 (29-4-2017)

20 To
Jim
Hide
Photos
image004.jpg
25 image006.jpg
image008.jpg
image013.jpg
image014.jpg
30 Message body
Daniel Andrews pathetic Labor government is failing Victorians with their

weak, ineffective law and order policies. What is required is a similar zero
tolerance strategy that has worked so effectively in New York. Dan Andrews
35 promised to get tough on crime after the 2016 Moomba riots and then
unbelievably, proceeded to soften the bail laws. It appears the Andrews
government and judiciary are more concerned with the criminals rights rather
than the victims.
40 Jim
Most dangerous parts of Melbournes CBD revealed

Alex White and Therese Allaoui, Sunday Herald Sun
45 April 9, 2017 12:42pm
Apex killed my son: A mums heartbreak
Violent teen gangs join forces with bikies
Big crime spikes in ritzy Melbourne areas
Apex thugs to be booted out of country
50
THE most dangerous parts of Melbournes CBD have been revealed as seven
out of 10 Victorians say they feel unsafe in the heart of our city.
Sunday Herald Sun readers surveyed said they were uneasy walking on
Flinders, King and Swanston streets, claiming those areas were awash with
55 crime.
St Pauls Cathedral, tunnels under the Princes Bridge, the banks of the Yarra
and Flagstaff Gardens were also on the list of no-go zones.
Page 23
Alarmingly, 73 per cent of the 2000 respondents said they felt at risk in the
CBD and 71 per cent felt unsafe in the suburbs despite Melbourne holding
the title of worlds most liveable city.
The findings come as Melburnians continue to be fearful of rising crime.
5
Gabbie and Kirsten Gray and Kaitlyn Gilmour feel unsafe at Flinders St. Picture:
Andrew Henshaw
Dozens of female respondents to the survey said shady characters were rife
in the city centre. Many said they or a friend had experienced assault and/or
10 intimidation near Flinders St station.
Kirsten Gray, 20, said she and her friends avoided the transport hub and
chose to use Uber because they would get harassed in the area.
You do see a lot of homeless people and a lot of drinking spots, so you have
drunks hanging around the area, she said.
15 Kaitlyn Gilmour, 21, said smokers would also hassle them for cigarettes.
You get a lot of the rowdier stragglers around the station, Ms Gilmour said.
Last month, Victorian statistics revealed the states crime rate increased by
10.2 per cent, surging higher than NSW figures in 2016.
Offences in Melbournes CBD were up 6.5 per cent.
20
A map of unsafe places in the CBD, as per SHS survey.
Alarmingly, crimes against a person surged by 28 per cent, burglaries were
up 59 per cent, public nuisance charges jumped by 55 per cent, weapons
offences increased by 13 per cent and drug offences jumped 7.7 per cent.
25 Minister for Police Lisa Neville hinted council and Victoria Police were
working on a new security plan, saying: We dont want anyone to feel unsafe
in the CBD.
A New York-style surveillance centre is now up and running, pooling live
CCTV and social media intelligence that can be immediately passed to police
30 patrols.
Superintendent David Clayton said the centre was key to making Melburnians
feel safer.
Every Friday and Saturday night, along with other peak periods, police run a
specialised operation to monitor behaviour and public safety in key areas of
35 the city, Supt Clayton said.
Anyone visiting, living or working in the city can be assured that Victoria
Police has a 24/7 presence, with an absolute focus on ensuring the safety
and security of all members of the community.
Opposition police spokesman Edward ODonohue said Melbournes
40 reputation as a safe and liveable city is under serious threat.
A strong police presence in Melbourne CBD

FEAR STALKS ME
WALKING though the heart of Melbourne after dark can be unnerving for a
45 lone woman.
Once the sun sets on a Friday or a Saturday, people from across the state
converge on bars and clubs, taking advantage of the roaring night-life.
But a dingier, dirtier side of the CBD emerges too, with certain areas leaving
any young woman feeling like she has to constantly glance over her shoulder.
50 On Friday, uniformed, plainclothes and Critical Incident Response Team police
man many intersections.
Unsavoury characters buzz around near the corner of Flinders and Swanston
streets, down the block and around the ATMs.
Similar scenes are threaded down Flinders St and into Elizabeth St.
55 Fast-food rubbish is strewn across the Swanston St footpaths and into the
gutter, only adding to the hazards and the grim, grotty scenes.
Therese Allaoui

Page 24
Melbourne gangs massive crime spree (video. 1:22 min.)
Source:
5 http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/most-dangerous-parts-of-
melbournes-cbd-revealed/news-
story/0c73313c38662564dad2293c873c53c3
END QUOTE
Again:
10 QUOTE
Minister for Police Lisa Neville hinted council and Victoria Police were working on a new security
plan, saying: We dont want anyone to feel unsafe in the CBD.
END QUOTE
15 So what security plan if you got police nearby (and let us not ignore the police at the corner of
Swanston and Flinders Streets corner doing absolutely nothing to try to apprehend the driver
there!
QUOTE
20 Victoria Police fail to come to the aid of an elderly man being assaulted near them.
People
Today at 16:59 (29-4-2017)

25 To
Jim
Hide
Photos
image002.jpg
30 image004.jpg
image006.jpg
Message body
I wonder what kind of media relations spin the Andrews government and Victoria police will use to
35 defend the police failure in their duty of care to protect a victim being assaulted within visual range of
six nearby cops. How is it possible that none of the six cops noticed a crime taking place only metres
away across a street in front of them? Were they all visually impaired or just negligent and
incompetent?
40 Jim
Police swarm corner of Flinders and Swanston streets in Melbourne CBD

Law & Order
Aneeka Simonis, Herald Sun
45 April 29, 2017 9:57am
Subscriber only
Most dangerous parts of Melbournes CBD revealed
Former police officers unveil plan to counter Victorias crime crisis
50 Swanston St kiosk manager Senol Kocabiyik was attacked by a number of youths. Picture: Tony
Gough
UPDATE: POLICE have failed to come to the aid of a defenceless CBD worker left bloodied after a
violent attack which unfolded just metres from several uniformed officers.
Kiosk manager Senol Kocabiyik, 60, was left with three bloody wounds to his forehead after a group of
55 youths allegedly launched an unprovoked attack on him at his kiosk on the corner of Swanston Street
and Flinders Street before 10pm on Friday.
Swanston St kiosk manager Senol Kocabiyik was left with three bloody wounds to his forehead.
Picture: Tony Gough
60 Police cars were stationed directly out the front of his kiosk when the attack occurred, and witnesses
told the Herald Sun about six officers were on the other side of the road attending to another matter.
Page 25
But none came to help the injured older man as he mopped up his face covered in blood.
One witness said he notified officers of the incident, and attended the nearby police station to get the
worker help.
Ever since then I havent been able to track down a police officer, the witness said.
5 Mr Kocabiyik broke down in tears as he recalled the senseless attack.
He said up to five teenagers pelted hard-tin mints at his forehead after attempting to steal items from
his store.
He said they did not scare when he threatened to call police.
I am not safe here, he said.
10
Swanston St kiosk manager Senol Kocabiyik shows his wounds. Picture: Tony Gough
Victoria Police spokeswoman Creina OGrady did not have a record of the incident when contacted by
the Herald Sun.
She said police had arrested three youths, aged 16 to 18, in relation to unrelated robbery offences
15 outside nearby St Pauls Cathedral about the same time of the attack.
with Eliza Sum
aneeka.simonis@news.com.au
@AneekaSimonis
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/police-swarm-corner-of-flinders-and-swanston-streets-
20 in-melbourne-cbd/news-story/ab64b7095a45fab0ece4ea25eef7f22b
END QUOTE
What therefore the government claims versus reality is starkly different. One would wonder who
was indeed covering the back of the 6 police officers if none of them was even bothering to keep
25 an eye on what was going on around them! Surely, with todays climate of possible terrorism you
would expect that at least one of the police officers would keep an eye on the surroundings? And
what appears to be is in my view a drastic operational failure to train police officers to work
together and watch each other back.
30 Fluoride may also perhaps be a contributing factor to road-rage where usage of fluoride water
could result or at least might be a participant in causing depression. We then also may have to
consider the other unwanted kind of poisons in our food such as preservatives how this may
affect the mental status of a person. And let us not ignore vaccines as I have quoted below an
email regarding this, how this too can result in health problems. As such the toxic combination of
35 it all might as yet never have been appropriately investigated but may have a serious relevance to
the state of mind of a person who might be involved in some road-rage or other conduct that end
up killing people and/or harming others.
http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/
40 QUOTE
26) Fluoride affects thyroid function. According to the U.S. National Research Council (2006), several
lines of information indicate an effect of fluoride exposure on thyroid function. In the Ukraine, Bachinskii
(1985) found a lowering of thyroid function, among otherwise healthy people, at 2.3 ppm fluoride in water. In
the middle of the 20th century, fluoride was prescribed by a number of European doctors to reduce the
45 activity of the thyroid gland for those suffering from hyperthyroidism (overactive thyroid) (Stecher 1960;
Waldbott 1978). According to a clinical study by Galletti and Joyet (1958), the thyroid function of
hyperthyroid patients was effectively reduced at just 2.3 to 4.5 mg/day of fluoride ion. To put this finding in
perspective, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS, 1991) has estimated that total fluoride
exposure in fluoridated communities ranges from 1.6 to 6.6 mg/day. This is a remarkable fact, particularly
50 considering the rampant and increasing problem of hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid) in the United States
and other fluoridated countries. Symptoms of hypothyroidism include depression, fatigue, weight gain,
muscle and joint pains, increased cholesterol levels, and heart disease. In 2010, the second most prescribed
drug of the year was Synthroid (sodium levothyroxine) which is a hormone replacement drug used to treat an
underactive thyroid.
55 END QUOTE
Fluoride Action Network | 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation
Page 26
fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/
by P Connett - Cited by 10 - Related articles
Water fluoridation goes against leading principles of pharmacotherapy, ... Since swallowing fluoride is
unnecessary, and potentially dangerous, there is no ...
5
Fluoride - Dangers of Fluoridation | Mercola.com
fluoride.mercola.com/
Learn about the dangers of fluoride and why the practice of water fluoridation should be ended now.
10 Is Fluoride Safe? | Is Fluoride Dangerous? | Get Answers!

ilikemyteeth.org/fluoridation/dangers-of-fluoride/
YES! Community water fluoridation (CWF) is safe, effective and necessary to protect teeth at all ages.
That's the conclusion of every major health organization in ...
15 Water Fluoridation and Cancer Risk - American Cancer Society

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/water-fluoridation-and-cancer-risk.html
Jul 28, 2015 - More than 60 years after fluoride was first added to drinking water in some parts of the United
States, there is still controversy surrounding the ...
20 9 Shocking Dangers of Fluoride Exposure - Global Healing Center

www.globalhealingcenter.com Blog Home Health Condition Articles
Jan 27, 2014 - Toothpaste and water usually contain fluoride. They say it's good for our teeth but studies
disagree. Here we look at 9 dangers of fluoride ...
25 QUOTE
ANNA BLIGH'S LETTER OF GUARANTEE OF SAFETY AGINST FLUORIDE.
People

30 Today at 15:00 (30-4-2017)
To
Hide
Photos
35 Bligh copy.jpg
Message body
FYI
Brian McDermott ID 167035
40 Governor, Central Queensland Free State
Qualified Commonwealth Public Official
Coordinator and Co-Founder, Coinspace.
Ph D. in Common Sense.
PH: +61449 585 159

Page 27
Skype: Governor2108
1 Attachment
Bligh copy .jpg
5 END QUOTE
http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/
QUOTE
50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation
10 By Paul Connett, PhD (updated in September 2012)
Introduction
Dr. Paul Connett

Page 28
In Europe, only Ireland (73%), Poland (1%), Serbia (3%), Spain (11%), and the U.K. (11%) fluoridate any of their
water. Most developed countries, including Japan and 97% of the western European population, do not consume
fluoridated water.
In the U.S., about 70% of public water supplies are fluoridated. This equates to approximately 185 million people,
5 which is over half the number of people drinking artificially fluoridated water worldwide. Some countries have areas
with high natural fluoride levels in the water. These include India, China and parts of Africa. In these countries
measures are being taken to remove the fluoride because of the health problems that fluoride can cause.
Fluoridation is a bad medical practice
1) Fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical treatment. The U.S. Food and Drug
10 Administration (FDA) classifies fluoride as a drug when used to prevent or mitigate disease (FDA 2000). As a
matter of basic logic, adding fluoride to water for the sole purpose of preventing tooth decay (a non-waterborne
disease) is a form of medical treatment. All other water treatment chemicals are added to improve the waters quality
or safety, which fluoride does not do.
2) Fluoridation is unethical. Informed consent is standard practice for all medication, and one of the key reasons
15 why most of Western Europe has ruled against fluoridation. With water fluoridation we are allowing governments to
do to whole communities (forcing people to take a medicine irrespective of their consent) what individual doctors
cannot do to individual patients.
Put another way: Does a voter have the right to require that their neighbor ingest a certain medication (even if it is
against that neighbors will)?
20 3) The dose cannot be controlled. Once fluoride is put in the water it is impossible to control the dose each
individual receives because people drink different amounts of water. Being able to control the dose a patient receives
is critical. Some people (e.g., manual laborers, athletes, diabetics, and people with kidney disease) drink
substantially more water than others.
4) The fluoride goes to everyone regardless of age, health or vulnerability. According to Dr. Arvid Carlsson, the
25 2000 Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology and one of the scientists who helped keep fluoridation out of
Sweden:
Water fluoridation goes against leading principles of pharmacotherapy, which is progressing from a stereotyped
medication of the type 1 tablet 3 times a day to a much more individualized therapy as regards both dosage
and selection of drugs. The addition of drugs to the drinking water means exactly the opposite of an individualized
30 therapy (Carlsson 1978).
5) People now receive fluoride from many other sources besides water. Fluoridated water is not the only way
people are exposed to fluoride. Other sources of fluoride include food and beverages processed with fluoridated
water (Kiritsy 1996; Heilman 1999), fluoridated dental products (Bentley 1999; Levy 1999), mechanically deboned
meat (Fein 2001), tea (Levy 1999), and pesticide residues (e.g., from cryolite) on food (Stannard 1991; Burgstahler
35 1997). It is now widely acknowledged that exposure to non-water sources of fluoride has significantly increased
since the water fluoridation program first began (NRC 2006).
6) Fluoride is not an essential nutrient. No disease, not even tooth decay, is caused by a fluoride
deficiency.(NRC 1993; Institute of Medicine 1997, NRC 2006). Not a single biological process has been shown to
require fluoride. On the contrary there is extensive evidence that fluoride can interfere with many important
40 biological processes. Fluoride interferes with numerous enzymes (Waldbott 1978). In combination with aluminum,
fluoride interferes with G-proteins (Bigay 1985, 1987). Such interactions give aluminum-fluoride complexes the
potential to interfere with signals from growth factors, hormones and neurotransmitters (Strunecka & Patocka 1999;
Li 2003). More and more studies indicate that fluoride can interfere with biochemistry in fundamental ways (Barbier
2010).
45 7) The level in mothers milk is very low. Considering reason #6 it is perhaps not surprising that the level of
fluoride in mothers milk is remarkably low (0.004 ppm, NRC, 2006). This means that a bottle-fed baby consuming
fluoridated water (0.6 1.2 ppm) can get up to 300 times more fluoride than a breast-fed baby. There are no benefits

Page 29
(see reasons #11-19), only risks (see reasons #21-36), for infants ingesting this heightened level of fluoride at such
an early age (an age where susceptibility to environmental toxins is particularly high).
8 ) Fluoride accumulates in the body. Healthy adult kidneys excrete 50 to 60% of the fluoride ingested each day
(Marier & Rose 1971). The remainder accumulates in the body, largely in calcifying tissues such as the bones and
5 pineal gland (Luke 1997, 2001). Infants and children excrete less fluoride from their kidneys and take up to 80% of
ingested fluoride into their bones (Ekstrand 1994). The fluoride concentration in bone steadily increases over a
lifetime (NRC 2006).
9) No health agency in fluoridated countries is monitoring fluoride exposure or side effects. No regular
measurements are being made of the levels of fluoride in urine, blood, bones, hair, or nails of either the general
10 population or sensitive subparts of the population (e.g., individuals with kidney disease).
10) There has never been a single randomized controlled trial to demonstrate fluoridations effectiveness or
safety. Despite the fact that fluoride has been added to community water supplies for over 60 years, there have
been no randomized trials of water fluoridation (Cheng 2007). Randomized trials are the standard method for
determining the safety and effectiveness of any purportedly beneficial medical treatment. In 2000, the British
15 Governments York Review could not give a single fluoridation trial a Grade A classification despite 50 years of
research (McDonagh 2000). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to classify fluoride as an
unapproved new drug.
Swallowing fluoride provides no (or very little) benefit
11) Benefit is topical not systemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 1999, 2001) has now
20 acknowledged that the mechanism of fluorides benefits are mainly topical, not systemic. There is no need
whatsoever, therefore, to swallow fluoride to protect teeth. Since the purported benefit of fluoride is topical, and the
risks are systemic, it makes more sense to deliver the fluoride directly to the tooth in the form of toothpaste. Since
swallowing fluoride is unnecessary, and potentially dangerous, there is no justification for forcing people (against
their will) to ingest fluoride through their water supply.
25 12) Fluoridation is not necessary. Most western, industrialized countries have rejected water fluoridation, but have
nevertheless experienced the same decline in childhood dental decay as fluoridated countries. (See data from World
Health Organization presented graphically in Figure).

Page 30
13) Fluoridations role in the decline of tooth decay is in serious doubt. The largest survey ever conducted in the
US (over 39,000 children from 84 communities) by the National Institute of Dental Research showed little
difference in tooth decay among children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities (Hileman 1989).
According to NIDR researchers, the study found an average difference of only 0.6 DMFS (Decayed, Missing, and
5 Filled Surfaces) in the permanent teeth of children aged 5-17 residing their entire lives in either fluoridated or
unfluoridated areas (Brunelle & Carlos, 1990). This difference is less than one tooth surface, and less than 1% of the
100+ tooth surfaces available in a childs mouth. Large surveys from three Australian states have found even less of
a benefit, with decay reductions ranging from 0 to 0.3 of one permanent tooth surface (Spencer 1996; Armfield &
Spencer 2004). None of these studies have allowed for the possible delayed eruption of the teeth that may be caused
10 by exposure to fluoride, for which there is some evidence (Komarek 2005). A one-year delay in eruption of the
permanent teeth would eliminate the very small benefit recorded in these modern studies.
14) NIH-funded study on individual fluoride ingestion and tooth decay found no significant correlation. A
multi-million dollar, U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study found no significant relationship
between tooth decay and fluoride intake among children. (Warren 2009) This is the first time tooth decay has been
15 investigated as a function of individual exposure (as opposed to mere residence in a fluoridated community).
15) Tooth decay is high in low-income communities that have been fluoridated for years. Despite some claims
to the contrary, water fluoridation cannot prevent the oral health crises that result from rampant poverty, inadequate
nutrition, and lack of access to dental care. There have been numerous reports of severe dental crises in low-income
neighborhoods of US cities that have been fluoridated for over 20 years (e.g., Boston, Cincinnati, New York City,
20 and Pittsburgh). In addition, research has repeatedly found fluoridation to be ineffective at preventing the most
serious oral health problem facing poor children, namely baby bottle tooth decay, otherwise known as early
childhood caries (Barnes 1992; Shiboski 2003).
16) Tooth decay does not go up when fluoridation is stopped. Where fluoridation has been discontinued in
communities from Canada, the former East Germany, Cuba and Finland, dental decay has not increased but has
25 generally continued to decrease (Maupom 2001; Kunzel & Fischer, 1997, 2000; Kunzel 2000; Seppa 2000).
17) Tooth decay was coming down before fluoridation started. Modern research shows that decay rates were
coming down before fluoridation was introduced in Australia and New Zealand and have continued to decline even
after its benefits would have been maximized. (Colquhoun 1997; Diesendorf 1986). As the following figure
indicates, many other factors are responsible for the decline of tooth decay that has been universally reported
30 throughout the western world.

Page 31
18) The studies that launched fluoridation were methodologically flawed. The early trials conducted between
1945 and 1955 in North America that helped to launch fluoridation, have been heavily criticized for their poor
methodology and poor choice of control communities (De Stefano 1954; Sutton 1959, 1960, 1996; Ziegelbecker
1970). According to Dr. Hubert Arnold, a statistician from the University of California at Davis, the early
5 fluoridation trials are especially rich in fallacies, improper design, invalid use of statistical methods, omissions of
contrary data, and just plain muddleheadedness and hebetude. Serious questions have also been raised about
Trendley Deans (the father of fluoridation) famous 21-city study from 1942 (Ziegelbecker 1981).
Children are being over-exposed to fluoride
19) Children are being over-exposed to fluoride. The fluoridation program has massively failed to achieve one of
10 its key objectives, i.e., to lower dental decay rates while limiting the occurrence of dental fluorosis (a discoloring of
tooth enamel caused by too much fluoride. The goal of the early promoters of fluoridation was to limit dental
fluorosis (in its very mild form) to10% of children (NRC 1993, pp. 6-7). In 2010, however, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 41% of American adolescents had dental fluorosis, with 8.6% having
mild fluorosis and 3.6% having either moderate or severe dental fluorosis (Beltran-Aguilar 2010). As the 41%
15 prevalence figure is a national average and includes children living in fluoridated and unfluoridated areas, the
fluorosis rate in fluoridated communities will obviously be higher. The British Governments York Review
estimated that up to 48% of children in fluoridated areas worldwide have dental fluorosis in all forms, with 12.5%
having fluorosis of aesthetic concern (McDonagh, 2000).
20 20) The highest doses of fluoride are going to bottle-fed babies. Because of their sole reliance on liquids for their
food intake, infants consuming formula made with fluoridated water have the highest exposure to fluoride, by
bodyweight, in the population. Because infant exposure to fluoridated water has been repeatedly found to be a major
risk factor for developing dental fluorosis later in life (Marshall 2004; Hong 2006; Levy 2010), a number of dental
researchers have recommended that parents of newborns not use fluoridated water when reconstituting formula
25 (Ekstrand 1996; Pendrys 1998; Fomon 2000; Brothwell 2003; Marshall 2004). Even the American Dental
Association (ADA), the most ardent institutional proponent of fluoridation, distributed a November 6, 2006 email
alert to its members recommending that parents be advised that formula should be made with low or no-fluoride
water. Unfortunately, the ADA has done little to get this information into the hands of parents. As a result, many
parents remain unaware of the fluorosis risk from infant exposure to fluoridated water.
30 Evidence of harm to other tissues
21) Dental fluorosis may be an indicator of wider systemic damage. There have been many suggestions as to the
possible biochemical mechanisms underlying the development of dental fluorosis (Matsuo 1998; Den Besten 1999;
Sharma 2008; Duan 2011; Tye 2011) and they are complicated for a lay reader. While promoters of fluoridation are
content to dismiss dental fluorosis (in its milder forms) as merely a cosmetic effect, it is rash to assume that fluoride
35 is not impacting other developing tissues when it is visibly damaging the teeth by some biochemical mechanism
(Groth 1973; Colquhoun 1997). Moreover, ingested fluoride can only cause dental fluorosis during the period before
Page 32
the permanent teeth have erupted (6-8 years), other tissues are potentially susceptible to damage throughout life. For
example, in areas of naturally high levels of fluoride the first indicator of harm is dental fluorosis in children. In the
same communities many older people develop skeletal fluorosis.
22) Fluoride may damage the brain. According to the National Research Council (2006), it is apparent that
5 fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain. In a review of the literature commissioned by
the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), fluoride has been listed among about 100 chemicals for which
there is substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity. Animal experiments show that fluoride accumulates
in the brain and alters mental behavior in a manner consistent with a neurotoxic agent (Mullenix 1995). In total,
there have now been over 100 animal experiments showing that fluoride can damage the brain and impact learning
10 and behavior. According to fluoridation proponents, these animal studies can be ignored because high doses were
used. However, it is important to note that rats generally require five times more fluoride to reach the same plasma
levels in humans (Sawan 2010). Further, one animal experiment found effects at remarkably low doses (Varner
1998). In this study, rats fed for one year with 1 ppm fluoride in their water (the same level used in fluoridation
programs), using either sodium fluoride or aluminum fluoride, had morphological changes to their kidneys and
15 brains, an increased uptake of aluminum in the brain, and the formation of beta-amyloid deposits which are
associated with Alzheimers disease. Other animal studies have found effects on the brain at water fluoride levels as
low as 5 ppm (Liu 2010).
23) Fluoride may lower IQ. There have now been 33 studies from China, Iran, India and Mexico that have reported
an association between fluoride exposure and reduced IQ. One of these studies (Lin 1991) indicates that even just
20 moderate levels of fluoride exposure (e.g., 0.9 ppm in the water) can exacerbate the neurological defects of iodine
deficiency. Other studies have found IQ reductions at 1.9 ppm (Xiang 2003a,b); 0.3-3.0 ppm (Ding 2011); 1.8-3.9
ppm (Xu 1994); 2.0 ppm (Yao 1996, 1997); 2.1-3.2 ppm (An 1992); 2.38 ppm (Poureslami 2011); 2.45 ppm (Eswar
2011); 2.5 ppm (Seraj 2006); 2.85 ppm (Hong 2001); 2.97 ppm (Wang 2001, Yang 1994); 3.15 ppm (Lu 2000); 4.12
ppm (Zhao 1996). In the Ding study, each 1 ppm increase of fluoride in urine was associated with a loss of 0.59 IQ
25 points. None of these studies indicate an adequate margin of safety to protect all children drinking artificially
fluoridated water from this affect. According to the National Research Council (2006), the consistency of the
results [in fluoride/IQ studies] appears significant enough to warrant additional research on the effects of fluoride on
intelligence. The NRCs conclusion has recently been amplified by a team of Harvard scientists whose fluoride/IQ
meta-review concludes that fluorides impact on the developing brain should be a high research priority. (Choi et
30 al., 2012). Except for one small IQ study from New Zealand (Spittle 1998) no fluoridating country has yet
investigated the matter.
24) Fluoride may cause non-IQ neurotoxic effects. Reduced IQ is not the only neurotoxic effect that may result
from fluoride exposure. At least three human studies have reported an association between fluoride exposure and
impaired visual-spatial organization (Calderon 2000; Li 2004; Rocha-Amador 2009); while four other studies have
35 found an association between prenatal fluoride exposure and fetal brain damage (Han 1989; Du 1992; Dong 1993;
Yu 1996).
25) Fluoride affects the pineal gland. Studies by Jennifer Luke (2001) show that fluoride accumulates in the
human pineal gland to very high levels. In her Ph.D. thesis, Luke has also shown in animal studies that fluoride
reduces melatonin production and leads to an earlier onset of puberty (Luke 1997). Consistent with Lukes findings,
40 one of the earliest fluoridation trials in the U.S. (Schlesinger 1956) reported that on average young girls in the
fluoridated community reached menstruation 5 months earlier than girls in the non-fluoridated community.
Inexplicably, no fluoridating country has attempted to reproduce either Lukes or Schlesingers findings or examine
the issue any further.
26) Fluoride affects thyroid function. According to the U.S. National Research Council (2006), several lines of
45 information indicate an effect of fluoride exposure on thyroid function. In the Ukraine, Bachinskii (1985) found a
lowering of thyroid function, among otherwise healthy people, at 2.3 ppm fluoride in water. In the middle of the
20th century, fluoride was prescribed by a number of European doctors to reduce the activity of the thyroid gland for
those suffering from hyperthyroidism (overactive thyroid) (Stecher 1960; Waldbott 1978). According to a clinical
study by Galletti and Joyet (1958), the thyroid function of hyperthyroid patients was effectively reduced at just 2.3
50 to 4.5 mg/day of fluoride ion. To put this finding in perspective, the Department of Health and Human Services
(DHHS, 1991) has estimated that total fluoride exposure in fluoridated communities ranges from 1.6 to 6.6 mg/day.
This is a remarkable fact, particularly considering the rampant and increasing problem of hypothyroidism
(underactive thyroid) in the United States and other fluoridated countries. Symptoms of hypothyroidism include
depression, fatigue, weight gain, muscle and joint pains, increased cholesterol levels, and heart disease. In 2010, the

Page 33
second most prescribed drug of the year was Synthroid (sodium levothyroxine) which is a hormone replacement
drug used to treat an underactive thyroid.
27) Fluoride causes arthritic symptoms. Some of the early symptoms of skeletal fluorosis (a fluoride-induced
bone and joint disease that impacts millions of people in India, China, and Africa), mimic the symptoms of arthritis
5 (Singh 1963; Franke 1975; Teotia 1976; Carnow 1981; Czerwinski 1988; DHHS 1991). According to a review on
fluoridation published in Chemical & Engineering News, Because some of the clinical symptoms mimic arthritis,
the first two clinical phases of skeletal fluorosis could be easily misdiagnosed (Hileman 1988). Few, if any, studies
have been done to determine the extent of this misdiagnosis, and whether the high prevalence of arthritis in America
(1 in 3 Americans have some form of arthritis CDC, 2002) and other fluoridated countries is related to growing
10 fluoride exposure, which is highly plausible. Even when individuals in the U.S. suffer advanced forms of skeletal
fluorosis (from drinking large amounts of tea), it has taken years of misdiagnoses before doctors finally correctly
diagnosed the condition as fluorosis.
28) Fluoride damages bone. An early fluoridation trial (Newburgh-Kingston 1945-55) found a significant two-fold
increase in cortical bone defects among children in the fluoridated community (Schlesinger 1956). The cortical bone
15 is the outside layer of the bone and is important to protect against fracture. While this result was not considered
important at the time with respect to bone fractures, it did prompt questions about a possible link to osteosarcoma
(Caffey, 1955; NAS, 1977). In 2001, Alarcon-Herrera and co-workers reported a linear correlation between the
severity of dental fluorosis and the frequency of bone fractures in both children and adults in a high fluoride area in
Mexico.
20 29) Fluoride may increase hip fractures in the elderly. When high doses of fluoride (average 26 mg per day) were
used in trials to treat patients with osteoporosis in an effort to harden their bones and reduce fracture rates, it actually
led to a higher number of fractures, particularly hip fractures (Inkovaara 1975; Gerster 1983; Dambacher 1986;
ODuffy 1986; Hedlund 1989; Bayley 1990; Gutteridge 1990. 2002; Orcel 1990; Riggs 1990 and Schnitzler 1990).
Hip fracture is a very serious issue for the elderly, often leading to a loss of independence or a shortened life. There
25 have been over a dozen studies published since 1990 that have investigated a possible relationship between hip
fractures and long term consumption of artificially fluoridated water or water with high natural levels. The results
have been mixed some have found an association and others have not. Some have even claimed a protective effect.
One very important study in China, which examined hip fractures in six Chinese villages, found what appears to be a
dose-related increase in hip fracture as the concentration of fluoride rose from 1 ppm to 8 ppm (Li 2001) offering
30 little comfort to those who drink a lot of fluoridated water. Moreover, in the only human epidemiological study to
assess bone strength as a function of bone fluoride concentration, researchers from the University of Toronto found
that (as with animal studies) the strength of bone declined with increasing fluoride content (Chachra 2010). Finally,
a recent study from Iowa (Levy 2009), published data suggesting that low-level fluoride exposure may have a
detrimental effect on cortical bone density in girls (an effect that has been repeatedly documented in clinical trials
35 and which has been posited as an important mechanism by which fluoride may increase bone fracture rates).
30) People with impaired kidney function are particularly vulnerable to bone damage. Because of their
inability to effectively excrete fluoride, people with kidney disease are prone to accumulating high levels of fluoride
in their bone and blood. As a result of this high fluoride body burden, kidney patients have an elevated risk for
developing skeletal fluorosis. In one of the few U.S. studies investigating the matter, crippling skeletal fluorosis was
40 documented among patients with severe kidney disease drinking water with just 1.7 ppm fluoride (Johnson 1979).
Since severe skeletal fluorosis in kidney patients has been detected in small case studies, it is likely that larger,
systematic studies would detect skeletal fluorosis at even lower fluoride levels.
31) Fluoride may cause bone cancer (osteosarcoma). A U.S. government-funded animal study found a dose-
dependent increase in bone cancer (osteosarcoma) in fluoride-treated, male rats (NTP 1990). Following the results of
45 this study, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) reviewed national cancer data in the U.S. and found a significantly
higher rate of osteosarcoma (a bone cancer) in young men in fluoridated versus unfluoridated areas (Hoover et al
1991a). While the NCI concluded (based on an analysis lacking statistical power) that fluoridation was not the cause
(Hoover et al 1991b), no explanation was provided to explain the higher rates in the fluoridated areas. A smaller
study from New Jersey (Cohn 1992) found osteosarcoma rates to be up to 6 times higher in young men living in
50 fluoridated versus unfluoridated areas. Other epidemiological studies of varying size and quality have failed to find
this relationship (a summary of these can be found in Bassin, 2001 and Connett & Neurath, 2005). There are three
reasons why a fluoride-osteosarcoma connection is plausible: First, fluoride accumulates to a high level in bone.
Second, fluoride stimulates bone growth. And, third, fluoride can interfere with the genetic apparatus of bone cells in
several ways; it has been shown to be mutagenic, cause chromosome damage, and interfere with the enzymes
55 involved with DNA repair in both cell and tissue studies (Tsutsui 1984; Caspary 1987; Kishi 1993; Mihashi 1996;

Page 34
Zhang 2009). In addition to cell and tissue studies, a correlation between fluoride exposure and chromosome damage
in humans has also been reported (Sheth 1994; Wu 1995; Meng 1997; Joseph 2000).
32) Proponents have failed to refute the Bassin-Osteosarcoma study. In 2001, Elise Bassin, a dentist,
successfully defended her doctoral thesis at Harvard in which she found that young boys had a five-to-seven fold
5 increased risk of getting osteosarcoma by the age of 20 if they drank fluoridated water during their mid-childhood
growth spurt (age 6 to 8). The study was published in 2006 (Bassin 2006) but has been largely discounted by
fluoridating countries because her thesis adviser Professor Chester Douglass (a promoter of fluoridation and a
consultant for Colgate) promised a larger study that he claimed would discount her thesis (Douglass and Joshipura,
2006). Now, after 5 years of waiting the Douglass study has finally been published (Kim 2011) but in no way does
10 this study discount Bassins findings. The study, which used far fewer controls than Bassins analysis, did not even
attempt to assess the age-specific window of risk that Bassin identified. Indeed, by the authors own admission, the
study had no capacity to assess the risk of osteosarcoma among children and adolescents (the precise population of
concern). For a critique of the Douglass study, click here.
33) Fluoride may cause reproductive problems. Fluoride administered to animals at high doses wreaks havoc on
15 the male reproductive system it damages sperm and increases the rate of infertility in a number of different species
(Kour 1980; Chinoy 1989; Chinoy 1991; Susheela 1991; Chinoy 1994; Kumar 1994; Narayana 1994a,b; Zhao 1995;
Elbetieha 2000; Ghosh 2002; Zakrzewska 2002). In addition, an epidemiological study from the US found increased
rates of infertility among couples living in areas with 3 ppm or more fluoride in the water (Freni 1994), two studies
have found increased fertility among men living in high-fluoride areas of China and India (Liu 1988; Neelam 1987);
20 four studies have found reduced level of circulating testosterone in males living in high fluoride areas (Hao 2010;
Chen P 1997; Susheela 1996; Barot 1998), and a study of fluoride-exposed workers reported a subclinical
reproductive effect (Ortiz-Perez 2003). While animal studies by FDA researchers have failed to find evidence of
reproductive toxicity in fluoride-exposed rats (Sprando 1996, 1997, 1998), the National Research Council (2006) has
recommended that, the relationship between fluoride and fertility requires additional study.
25 34) Some individuals are highly sensitive to low levels of fluoride as shown by case studies and double blind
studies. In one study, which lasted 13 years, Feltman and Kosel (1961) showed that about 1% of patients given 1 mg
of fluoride each day developed negative reactions. Many individuals have reported suffering from symptoms such as
fatigue, headaches, rashes and stomach and gastro intestinal tract problems, which disappear when they avoid
fluoride in their water and diet. (Shea 1967; Waldbott 1978; Moolenburgh 1987) Frequently the symptoms reappear
30 when they are unwittingly exposed to fluoride again (Spittle, 2008). No fluoridating government has conducted
scientific studies to take this issue beyond these anecdotal reports. Without the willingness of governments to
investigate these reports scientifically, should we as a society be forcing these people to ingest fluoride?
35) Other subsets of population are more vulnerable to fluorides toxicity. In addition to people suffering from
impaired kidney function discussed in reason #30 other subsets of the population are more vulnerable to fluorides
35 toxic effects. According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR 1993) these include:
infants, the elderly, and those with diabetes mellitus. Also vulnerable are those who suffer from malnutrition (e.g.,
calcium, magnesium, vitamin C, vitamin D and iodine deficiencies and protein-poor diets) and those who have
diabetes insipidus. See: Greenberg 1974; Klein 1975; Massler & Schour 1952; Marier & Rose 1977; Lin 1991; Chen
1997; Seow 1994; Teotia 1998.
40 No Margin of Safety
36) There is no margin of safety for several health effects. No one can deny that high natural levels of fluoride
damage health. Millions of people in India and China have had their health compromised by fluoride. The real
question is whether there is an adequate margin of safety between the doses shown to cause harm in published
studies and the total dose people receive consuming uncontrolled amounts of fluoridated water and non-water
45 sources of fluoride. This margin of safety has to take into account the wide range of individual sensitivity expected
in a large population (a safety factor of 10 is usually applied to the lowest level causing harm). Another safety factor
is also needed to take into account the wide range of doses to which people are exposed. There is clearly no margin
of safety for dental fluorosis (CDC, 2010) and based on the following studies nowhere near an adequate margin of
safety for lowered IQ (Xiang 2003a,b; Ding 2011; Choi 2012); lowered thyroid function (Galletti & Joyet 1958;
50 Bachinskii 1985; Lin 1991); bone fractures in children (Alarcon-Herrera 2001) or hip fractures in the elderly
(Kurttio 1999; Li 2001). All of these harmful effects are discussed in the NRC (2006) review.

Page 35
Environmental Justice
37) Low-income families penalized by fluoridation. Those most likely to suffer from poor nutrition, and thus more
likely to be more vulnerable to fluorides toxic effects, are the poor, who unfortunately, are the very people being
targeted by new fluoridation programs. While at heightened risk, poor families are least able to afford avoiding
5 fluoride once it is added to the water supply. No financial support is being offered to these families to help them get
alternative water supplies or to help pay the costs of treating unsightly cases of dental fluorosis.
38) Black and Hispanic children are more vulnerable to fluorides toxicity. According to the CDCs national
survey of dental fluorosis, black and Mexican-American children have significantly higher rates of dental fluorosis
than white children (Beltran-Aguilar 2005, Table 23). The recognition that minority children appear to be more
10 vulnerable to toxic effects of fluoride, combined with the fact that low-income families are less able to avoid
drinking fluoridated water, has prompted prominent leaders in the environmental-justice movement to oppose
mandatory fluoridation in Georgia. In a statement issued in May 2011, Andrew Young, a colleague of Martin Luther
King, Jr., and former Mayor of Atlanta and former US Ambassador to the United Nations, stated:
I am most deeply concerned for poor families who have babies: if they cannot afford unfluoridated water for their
15 babies milk formula, do their babies not count? Of course they do. This is an issue of fairness, civil rights, and
compassion. We must find better ways to prevent cavities, such as helping those most at risk for cavities obtain
access to the services of a dentistMy father was a dentist. I formerly was a strong believer in the benefits of water
fluoridation for preventing cavities. But many things that we began to do 50 or more years ago we now no longer do,
because we have learned further information that changes our practices and policies. So it is with fluoridation.
20 39) Minorities are not being warned about their vulnerabilities to fluoride. The CDC is not warning black and
Mexican-American children that they have higher rates of dental fluorosis than Caucasian children (see #38). This
extra vulnerability may extend to other toxic effects of fluoride. Black Americans have higher rates of lactose
intolerance, kidney problems and diabetes, all of which may exacerbate fluorides toxicity.
40) Tooth decay reflects low-income not low-fluoride intake. Since dental decay is most concentrated in poor
25 communities, we should be spending our efforts trying to increase the access to dental care for low-income families.
The highest rates of tooth decay today can be found in low-income areas that have been fluoridated for many years.
The real Oral Health Crisis that exists today in the United States, is not a lack of fluoride but poverty and lack of
dental insurance. The Surgeon General has estimated that 80% of dentists in the US do not treat children on
Medicaid.
30 The largely untested chemicals used in fluoridation programs
41) The chemicals used to fluoridate water are not pharmaceutical grade. Instead, they largely come from the
wet scrubbing systems of the phosphate fertilizer industry. These chemicals (90% of which are sodium fluorosilicate
and fluorosilicic acid), are classified hazardous wastes contaminated with various impurities. Recent testing by the
National Sanitation Foundation suggest that the levels of arsenic in these silicon fluorides are relatively high (up to
35 1.6 ppb after dilution into public water) and of potential concern (NSF 2000 and Wang 2000). Arsenic is a known
human carcinogen for which there is no safe level. This one contaminant alone could be increasing cancer rates
and unnecessarily so.
42) The silicon fluorides have not been tested comprehensively. The chemical usually tested in animal studies is
pharmaceutical grade sodium fluoride, not industrial grade fluorosilicic acid. Proponents claim that once the silicon
40 fluorides have been diluted at the public water works they are completely dissociated to free fluoride ions and
hydrated silica and thus there is no need to examine the toxicology of these compounds. However, while a study
from the University of Michigan (Finney et al., 2006) showed complete dissociation at neutral pH, in acidic
conditions (pH 3) there was a stable complex containing five fluoride ions. Thus the possibility arises that such a
complex may be regenerated in the stomach where the pH lies between 1 and 2.
45 43) The silicon fluorides may increase lead uptake into childrens blood. Studies by Masters and Coplan (1999,
2000, 2007), and to a lesser extent Macek (2006), show an association between the use of fluorosilicic acid (and its
sodium salt) to fluoridate water and an increased uptake of lead into childrens blood. Because of leads
acknowledged ability to damage the developing brain, this is a very serious finding. Nevertheless, it is being largely
ignored by fluoridating countries. This association received some strong biochemical support from an animal study

Page 36
by Sawan et al. (2010) who found that exposure of rats to a combination of fluorosilicic acid and lead in their
drinking water increased the uptake of lead into blood some threefold over exposure to lead alone.
44) Fluoride may leach lead from pipes, brass fittings and soldered joints. In tightly controlled laboratory
experiments, Maas et al (2007) have shown that fluoridating agents in combination with chlorinating agents such as
5 chloroamine increase the leaching of lead from brass fittings used in plumbing. While proponents may argue about
the neurotoxic effects of low levels of fluoride there is no argument that lead at very low levels lowers IQ in
children.
Continued promotion of fluoridation is unscientific
45) Key health studies have not been done. In the January 2008 issue of Scientific American, Professor John
10 Doull, the chairman of the important 2006 National Research Council review, Fluoride in Drinking Water: A
Review of EPAs Standards, is quoted as saying:
What the committee found is that weve gone with the status quo regarding fluoride for many yearsfor too long
reallyand now we need to take a fresh look . . . In the scientific community people tend to think this is settled. I
mean, when the U.S. surgeon general comes out and says this is one of the top 10 greatest achievements of the 20th
15 century, thats a hard hurdle to get over. But when we looked at the studies that have been done, we found that many
of these questions are unsettled and we have much less information than we should, considering how long this
[fluoridation] has been going on.
The absence of studies is being used by promoters as meaning the absence of harm. This is an irresponsible position.
46) Endorsements do not represent scientific evidence. Many of those promoting fluoridation rely heavily on a
20 list of endorsements. However, the U.S. PHS first endorsed fluoridation in 1950, before one single trial had been
completed and before any significant health studies had been published (see chapters 9 and 10 in The Case Against
Fluoride for the significance of this PHS endorsement for the future promotion of fluoridation). Many other
endorsements swiftly followed with little evidence of any scientific rational for doing so. The continued use of these
endorsements has more to do with political science than medical science.
25 47) Review panels hand-picked to deliver a pro-fluoridation result. Every so often, particularly when their
fluoridation program is under threat, governments of fluoridating countries hand-pick panels to deliver reports that
provide the necessary re-endorsement of the practice. In their recent book Fluoride Wars (2009), which is otherwise
slanted toward fluoridation, Alan Freeze and Jay Lehr concede this point when they write:
There is one anti-fluoridationist charge that does have some truth to it. Anti-fluoride forces have always claimed that
30 the many government-sponsored review panels set up over the years to assess the costs and benefits of fluoridation
were stacked in favor of fluoridation. A review of the membership of the various panels confirms this charge. The
expert committees that put together reports by the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1941,
1944 and 1954; the National Academy of Sciences in 1951, 1971, 1977 and 1993; the World Health Organization in
1958 and 1970; and the U.S. Public Health Service in 1991 are rife with the names of well-known medical and
35 dental researchers who actively campaigned on behalf of fluoridation or whose research was held in high regard in
the pro-fluoridation movement. Membership was interlocking and incestuous.
The most recent examples of these self-fulfilling prophecies have come from the Irish Fluoridation Forum (2002);
the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 2007) and Health Canada (2008, 2010). The latter
used a panel of six experts to review the health literature. Four of the six were pro-fluoridation dentists and the other
40 two had no demonstrated expertise on fluoride. A notable exception to this trend was the appointment by the U.S.
National Research Council of the first balanced panel of experts ever selected to look at fluorides toxicity in the
U.S. This panel of twelve reviewed the US EPAs safe drinking water standards for fluoride. After three and half
years the panel concluded in a 507- page report that the safe drinking water standard was not protective of health and
a new maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) should be determined (NRC, 2006). If normal toxicological
45 procedures and appropriate margins of safety were applied to their findings this report should spell an end to water
fluoridation. Unfortunately in January of 2011 the US EPA Office of Water made it clear that they would not
determine a value for the MCLG that would jeopardize the water fluoridation program (EPA press release, Jan 7,
2011. Once again politics was allowed to trump science.

Page 37
More and more independent scientists oppose fluoridation
48) Many scientists oppose fluoridation. Proponents of fluoridation have maintained for many years despite the
fact that the earliest opponents of fluoridation were biochemiststhat the only people opposed to fluoridation are
not bona fide scientists. Today, as more and more scientists, doctors, dentists and other professionals, read the
5 primary literature for themselves, rather than relying on self-serving statements from the ADA and the CDC, they
are realizing that they and the general public have not been diligently informed by their professional bodies on this
subject. As of January 2012, over 4,000 professionals have signed a statement calling for an end to water
fluoridation worldwide. This statement and a list of signatories can be found on the website of the Fluoride Action
Network. A glimpse of the caliber of those opposing fluoridation can be gleaned by watching the 28-minute video
10 Professional Perspectives on Water fluoridation which can be viewed online at the same FAN site.
Proponents dubious tactics
49) Proponents usually refuse to defend fluoridation in open debate. While pro-fluoridation officials continue to
promote fluoridation with undiminished fervor, they usually refuse to defend the practice in open public debate
even when challenged to do so by organizations such as the Association for Science in the Public Interest, the
15 American College of Toxicology, or the U.S. EPA (Bryson 2004). According to Dr. Michael Easley, a prominent
lobbyist for fluoridation in the US, Debates give the illusion that a scientific controversy exists when no credible
people support the fluorophobics view (Easley, 1999). In light of proponents refusal to debate this issue, Dr.
Edward Groth, a Senior Scientist at Consumers Union, observed that, the political profluoridation stance has
evolved into a dogmatic, authoritarian, essentially antiscientific posture, one that discourages open debate of
20 scientific issues (Martin 1991).
50) Proponents use very dubious tactics to promote fluoridation. Many scientists, doctors and dentists who have
spoken out publicly on this issue have been subjected to censorship and intimidation (Martin 1991). Dr. Phyllis
Mullenix was fired from her position as Chair of Toxicology at Forsythe Dental Center for publishing her findings
on fluoride and the brain (Mullenix 1995); and Dr. William Marcus was fired from the EPA for questioning the
25 governments handling of the NTPs fluoride-cancer study (Bryson 2004). Many dentists and even doctors tell
opponents in private that they are opposed to this practice but dare not speak out in public because of peer pressure
and the fear of recriminations. Tactics like this would not be necessary if those promoting fluoridation were on
secure scientific and ethical grounds.
Conclusion
30 When it comes to controversies surrounding toxic chemicals, vested interests traditionally do their very best to
discount animal studies and quibble with epidemiological findings. In the past, political pressures have led
government agencies to drag their feet on regulating asbestos, benzene, DDT, PCBs, tetraethyl lead, tobacco and
dioxins. With fluoridation we have had a sixty-year delay. Unfortunately, because government officials and dental
leaders have put so much of their credibility on the line defending fluoridation, and because of the huge liabilities
35 waiting in the wings if they admit that fluoridation has caused an increase in hip fracture, arthritis, bone cancer,
brain disorders or thyroid problems, it will be very difficult for them to speak honestly and openly about the issue.
But they must, not only to protect millions of people from unnecessary harm, but to protect the notion that, at its
core, public health policy must be based on sound science, not political expediency. They have a tool with which to
do this: its called the Precautionary Principle. Simply put, this says: if in doubt leave it out. This is what most
40 European countries have done and their childrens teeth have not suffered, while their publics trust has been
strengthened.
Just how much doubt is needed on just one of the health concerns identified above, to override a benefit, which
when quantified in the largest survey ever conducted in the US, amounts to less than one tooth surface (out of 128)
in a childs mouth?
45 While fluoridation may not be the greatest environmental health threat, it is one of the easiest to end. It is as easy as
turning off a spigot in the public water works. But to turn off that spigot takes political will and to get that we need
masses more people informed and organized. Please get these 50 reasons to all your friends and encourage them to
get fluoride out of their community and to help ban this practice worldwide.

Page 38
Postscript
Further arguments against fluoridation, can be viewed at http://www.fluoridealert.org and in the book The Case
Against Fluoridation (Chelsea Green, 2010). Arguments for fluoridation can be found at http://www.ada.org
Publication history of the 50 Reasons
5 The 50 Reasons were first compiled by Paul Connett and presented in person to the Irish Fluoridation Forum in
October 2000. The document was refined in 2004 and published in Medical Veritas. In the introduction to the 2004
version it was explained that after over four years the Irish authorities had not been able to muster a response to the
50 Reasons, despite agreeing to do so in 2000. Eventually, an anonymous, incomplete and superficial response was
posted on the Irish Department of Health and Childrens website (see this response and addendum
10 at:http://www.dohc.ie/other_health_issues/dental_research/. Paul Connetts comprehensive response to this response
can be accessed at http://www.fluoridealert.org/50reasons.ireland.pdf. We learned on August 7, 2011 that this
governmental response was prepared by an external contractor at a cost to the Irish taxpayers of over 30,000 Euros.
Since 2004, there have been many major scientific developments including the publication of the U.S. National
Research Council report (NRC, 2006); the publication of Bassins study on Osteosarcoma (Bassin 2006), and many
15 more studies of fluorides interaction with the brain, that necessitated a major update of the 50 Reasons in August
2011. This update was made with the generous assistance of James Beck, MD, PhD, Michael Connett, JD, Hardy
Limeback, DDS, PhD, David McRae and Spedding Micklem, D.Phil. Additional developments in 2012, including
FANs translation of over 20 Chinese studies on fluoride toxicity and publication of the Harvard teams meta-review
of fluoride and IQ (Choi 2012), warranted a further update in August 2012, with the extremely helpful assistance of
20 my son, Michael Connett.
References
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (1993). Toxicological Profile for Fluorides, Hydrogen
Fluoride, and Fluorine (F). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service. ATSDR/TP-
91/17.
25 Alarcon-Herrera MT, et al. (2001). Well Water Fluoride, Dental fluorosis, Bone Fractures in the Guadiana Valley of
Mexico. Fluoride. 34(2): 139-149.
Allain P, et al. (1996). Enhancement of aluminum digestive absorption by fluoride in rats. Research
Communications in Molecular Pathology and Pharmacology. 91: 225-31.
An J, et al. (1992). The effects of high fluoride on the level of intelligence of primary and secondary
30 students. Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases 7(2):93-94.
Armfield JM and Spencer AJ (2004). Consumption of Nonpublic Water: Implications for Childrens Caries
Experience, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 32(4): 28396
Arnold HA. (1980). Letter to Dr. Ernest Newbrun. May 28, 1980. http://www.fluoridealert.org/uc-davis.htm
Awadia AK, et al. (2002). Caries experience and caries predictors a study of Tanzanian children consuming
35 drinking water with different fluoride concentrations. Clinical Oral Investigations. (2002) 6:98-103.
Bachinskii PP, et al. (1985) Action of the body fluorine of healthy persons and thyroidopathy patients on the
function of hypophyseal-thyroid the system. Probl Endokrinol (Mosk) 31: 25-9.
Barbier O. (2010) Molecular mechanisms of fluoride toxicity. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 188: 319333.
Barnes GP, et al. (1992). Ethnicity, location, age, and fluoridation factors in baby bottle tooth decay and caries
40 prevalence of Head Start children. Public Health Reports. 107: 167-73.
Barot VV. (1998). Occurrence of endemic fluorosis in human population of North Gujarat, India: human health
risk. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 61: 303-10.
Page 39
Bassin EB. (2001). Association Between Fluoride in Drinking Water During Growth and Development and the
Incidence of Osteosarcoma for Children and Adolescents, DMSc thesis, Harvard School of Dental Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts.
Bassin EB et al. (2006). Age-specific Fluoride Exposure in Drinking Water and Osteosarcoma (United
5 States). Cancer Causes and Control. 17 (4): 42128.
Bayley TA, et al. (1990). Fluoride-induced fractures: relation to osteogenic effect. Journal of Bone and Mineral
Research.5(Suppl 1):S217-22.
Beltrn-Aguilar ED et al. (2010). Prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in the United States, 1999-2004. NCHS
DataBrief No. 53. U.S. DHHS, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics.
10 Beltrn-Aguilar ED et al. (2005). Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, endentulism, and
enamel fluorosisUnited States, 1988- 1994 and 1999-2002. CDC, MMWR, Surveillance Summaries, August 26,
vol. 54, No SS-3, pp. 1-44. See Table 23.
Bentley EM, et al. (1999). Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste by young children. British Dental Journal. 186: 460-2.
Bhatnagar M, et al. (2002). Neurotoxicity of fluoride: neurodegeneration in hippocampus of female mice. Indian
15 Journalof Experimental Biology. 40: 546-54.
Bigay J, et al. (1987). Fluoride complexes of aluminium or beryllium act on G-proteins as reversibly bound
analogues of the gamma phosphate of GTP. EMBO Journal. 6:2907-2913.
Bigay J, et al. (1985). Fluoroaluminates activate transducin-GDP by mimicking the gamma-phosphate of GTP in its
binding site. FEBS Letters. 191:181-185.
20 Brothwell D, Limeback H. (2003). Breastfeeding is protective against dental fluorosis in a nonfluoridated rural area
of Ontario, Canada. Journal of Human Lactation 19: 386-90.
Brunelle JA, Carlos JP. (1990). Recent trends in dental caries in U.S. children and the effect of water
fluoridation. Journalof Dental Research. 69(Special edition): 723-727.
Bryson C. (2004). The Fluoride Deception. Seven Stories Press, New York.
25 Burgstahler AW, et al. (1997). Fluoride in California wines and raisins. Fluoride. 30: 142-146.
Caffey J. On Fibrous Defects in Cortical Walls: Their Radiological Appearance, Structure, Prevalence, Natural
Course, and Diagnostic Significance in Advances in Pediatrics, ed. S. Z. Levin, (New York: Interscience, 1955).
Calderon J et al. (2000). Influence of fluoride exposure on reaction time and visuospatial organization in
children. Epidemiology11(4):S153.
30 Carlsson A. (1978). Current problems relating to the pharmacology and toxicology of fluorides. Journal of the
Swedish Medical Association. 14: 1388-1392.
Carnow BW, Conibear SA. (1981). Industrial fluorosis. Fluoride. 14: 172-181.
Caspary WJ, et al (1987). Mutagenic activity of fluorides in mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research. 187:165-
80.
35 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2002). Prevalence of Self-Reported Arthritis or Chronic Joint
Symptoms Among Adults United States, 2001. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report. 51: 948-950.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2001). Recommendations for Using Fluoride to Prevent and
Control Dental Caries in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 50(RR14): 1-42.

Page 40
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1999). Achievements in Public Health, 1900-1999: Fluoridation
of Drinking Water to Prevent Dental Caries. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report. 48: 933-940.
Chachra et al. (2010) The long-term effects of water fluoridation on the human skeleton. Journal of Dental
Research. 89(11): 1219-1223.
5 Chen J, et al. (2003). Selective decreases of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in PC12 cells exposed to
fluoride. Toxicology. 183: 235-42.
Chen J, et al. (2002). [Studies on DNA damage and apoptosis in rat brain induced by fluoride] Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi
Xue Za Zhi. 36 222-224.
Chen YC, et al. (1997). Nutrition survey in dental fluorosis-afflicted areas. Fluoride. 30(2):77-80.
10 Chen P, et al. (1997). Effects of hyperfluoride on reproduction-endocrine system of male adults. Endemic Diseases
Bulletin 12(2):57-58.
Choi AL, et al. (2012). Developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental
Health Perspectives doi:10.1289/ehp.1104912
Chinoy NJ, Narayana MV. (1994). In vitro fluoride toxicity in human spermatozoa. Reproductive Toxicology. 8:155-
15 9.
Chinoy NJ, et al. (1991). Microdose vasal injection of sodium fluoride in the rat. Reproductive Toxicology. 5: 505-
12.
Chinoy NJ, Sequeira E. (1989). Effects of fluoride on the histoarchitecture of reproductive organs of the male
mouse.Reproductive Toxicology. 3: 261-7.
20 P. D. Cohn (1992). An Epidemiologic Report on Drinking Water and Fluoridation, New Jersey Department of
Health, Environmental Health Service, November 8, 1992. Note: The original title of this report was A Brief Report
on the Association of Drinking Water Fluoridation and the Incidence of Osteosarcoma Among Young Males. The
word osteosarcoma was deleted from the title soon after the report was released.
Colquhoun J. (1997). Why I changed my mind about Fluoridation. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41: 29-44.
25 Connett PH, Beck J and Micklem S. The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking
Water and the Powerful Politics and Bad Science That Keep it There. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT,
2010.
Connett,P (2004) 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation (updated April 12, 2004). Reprinted in
Medical Veritas. 1:7080.
30 Connett M. (2004). Fluoride & Bone Damage: Published Data. Submission to National Research Council (NRC).
Connett, P. (2000). Fluoride: A Statement of Concern. Waste Not #459. January 2000. Waste Not, 82 Judson Street,
Canton, NY 13617.
Connett P, Neurath C and Connett M. (2005). Revisiting the Fluoride-Osteosarcoma Connection in the Context of
Elise Bassins Findings: Part II. Submission to the National Research Council of the National Academies review
35 panel on the Toxicologic Risk of Fluoride in Drinking Water, March 21, 2005 (revised April 8, 2005).
Czerwinski E, et al. (1988). Bone and joint pathology in fluoride-exposed workers. Archives of Environmental
Health. 43:340-343.
Dambacher MA, et al. (1986). Long-term fluoride therapy of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone 7: 199-205.

Page 41
De Liefde B. (1998). The decline of caries in New Zealand over the past 40 Years. New Zealand Dental Journal. 94:
109-113.
Department of Health & Human Services. (U.S. DHHS) (1991). Review of Fluoride: Benefits and Risks. Report of
the Ad Hoc Committee on Fluoride, Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs.
5 Department of Health and Human Services, USA.
DenBesten, P (1999). Biological mechanism of dental fluorosis relevant to the use of fluoride
supplements. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 27: 41-7.
De Stefano TM. (1954). The fluoridation research studies and the general practitioner. Bulletin of Hudson County
Dental Society.February.
10 Diesendorf M.(1986). The mystery of declining tooth decay. Nature. 322: 125-129.
Ding Y et al. (2010. The relationships between low levels of urine fluoride on childrens intelligence, dental
fluorosis in endemic fluorosis areas in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Hazardous
Materials. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.097.
Ditkoff BA, Lo Gerfo P. (2000). The Thyroid Guide. Harper-Collins. New York.
15 Dong Z, et al. (1993). Determination of the contents of amino-acid and monoamine neurotransmitters in fetal brains
from a fluorosis-endemic area. Journal of Guiyang Medical College 18(4):241-45.
Douglass CW and Joshipura K. (2006) Caution Needed in Fluoride and Osteosarcoma Study (letter), Cancer
Causes & Control. 17 (4): 48182.
Du L. 1992. The effect of fluorine on the developing human brain. Chinese Journal of Pathology 21(4):218-20
20 (republished in Fluoride41:327-30).
Duan X. et al. (2011). Excess Fluoride Interferes with Chloride-channel-dependent Endocytosis in Ameloblasts. J
Dent Res.90(2):175-180.
Easley, M. (1999). Community fluoridation in America: the unprincipled opposition. Dental

Watch. http://www.dentalwatch.org/fl/opposition.pdf (accessed March 21, 2010).
25 Ekambaram P, Paul V. (2001). Calcium preventing locomotor behavioral and dental toxicities of fluoride by
decreasing serum fluoride level in rats. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 9: 141-146.
Ekstrand J, et al. (1981). No evidence of transfer of fluoride from plasma to breast milk. British Medical
Journal (Clin Res Ed). 83: 761-2.
Ekstrand J, et al. (1994). Fluoride pharmacokinetics in infancy. Pediatric Research. 35:157163.
30 Ekstrand J. (1996). Fluoride Intake. In: Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Burt B, Eds. Fluoride in Dentistry, 2nd
Edition. Munksgaard, Denmark. Pages 40-52.
Elbetieha A, et al. (2000). Fertility effects of sodium fluoride in male mice. Fluoride. 33: 128-134.
Emsley J, et al (1981). An unexpectedly strong hydrogen bond: ab initio calculations and spectroscopic studies of
amidefluoride systems. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 103: 24-28.
35 Eswar P, et al. (2011). Intelligent quotients of 12-14 year old school children in a high and low fluoride village in
India. Fluoride 44:168-72.
Fagin, D. (2008). Second Thoughts on Fluoride. Scientific American 298 (1)(January): 7481.

Page 42
Fein NJ, Cerklewski FL. (2001). Fluoride content of foods made with mechanically separated chicken. Journal of
Agricultural Food Chemistry. 49: 4284-6.
Feltman R, Kosel G. (1961). Prenatal and postnatal ingestion of fluorides Fourteen years of investigation Final
report. Journal of Dental Medicine. 16: 190-99.
5 Finney WF et al. (2006) Reexamination of Hexafluorosilicate Hydrolysis by Fluoride NMR and pH

Measurement. Environmental Science & Technology 40 (8): 257277.
Fluoridation Forum (2002). Forum on Fluoridation (Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office, 2002).
Fomon SJ, et al. (2000). Fluoride intake and prevalence of dental fluorosis: trends in fluoride intake with special
attention to infants.Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 60: 131-9.
10 Franke J, et al. (1975). Industrial fluorosis. Fluoride. 8: 61-83.
Freni SC. (1994). Exposure to high fluoride concentrations in drinking water is associated with decreased birth
rates. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 42: 109-121.
Freeze RA and Lehr JA. The Fluoride Wars: How a Modest Public Health Measure Became Americas Longest-
Running Political Melodrama. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2009).
15 Freni SC, Gaylor DW. (1992). International trends in the incidence of bone cancer are not related to drinking water
fluoridation.Cancer. 70: 611-8.
Galletti P, Joyet G. (1958). Effect of fluorine on thyroidal iodine metabolism in hyperthyroidism. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology 18: 1102-1110.
Gerster JC, et al. (1983). Bilateral fractures of femoral neck in patients with moderate renal failure receiving fluoride
20 for spinal osteoporosis. British Medical Journal (Clin Res Ed). 287(6394):723-5.
Ghosh D, et al. (2002). Testicular toxicity in sodium fluoride treated rats: association with oxidative
stress. Reproductive Toxicolology.16: 385.
Gray, AS. (1987). Fluoridation: time for a new base line? Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 53: 763-5.
Greenberg LW, et al. (1974). Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with fluorosis. Pediatrics. 54(3):320-2.
25 Grobleri SR, et al. (2001). Dental fluorosis and caries experience in relation to three different drinking water fluoride
levels in South Africa. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 11(5):372-9.
Guan ZZ, et al (1998). Influence of chronic fluorosis on membrane lipids in rat brain. Neurotoxicology and
Teratology.20: 537-542.
Gutteridge DH, et al. (2002). A randomized trial of sodium fluoride (60 mg) +/- estrogen in postmenopausal
30 osteoporotic vertebral fractures: increased vertebral fractures and peripheral bone loss with sodium fluoride;
concurrent estrogen prevents peripheral loss, but not vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis International. 13(2):158-70.
Gutteridge DH, et al. (1990). Spontaneous hip fractures in fluoride-treated patients: potential causative
factors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 5 Suppl 1:S205-15.
Han H, Cheng Z, Liu W. 1989. Effects of fluorine on the human fetus. Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic
35 Diseases 4:136-138 (republished in Fluoride 41:321-6).
Hanmer R. (1983). Letter from Rebecca Hanmer, deputy assistant administrator for water, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, to Leslie A. Russell, D.M.D, March 30, 1983.

Page 43
Hao P, et al. (2010). Effect of fluoride on human hypothalamus-hypophysis-testis axis hormones. Journal of
Hygiene Research 39(1):53-55.
Hazan S. (2004). Letter from Stan Hazan, General Manager, NSF Drinking Water Additives Certification Program,
to Ken Calvert, Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, Committee on Science, US House of
5 Representatives.July 7.
Health Canada (2008). Findings and Recommendations of the Fluoride Expert Panel (January 2007). April 2008.
Health Canada (2010). Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document
Fluoride. Health Canada Dated Dec 2010, published June 21, 2011.
Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC. (1989). Increased incidence of hip fracture in osteoporotic women treated with sodium
10 fluoride. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 4: 223-5.
Heilman JR et al. (1999). Assessing Fluoride Levels of Carbonated Soft Drinks. Journal of the American Dental
Association. 130 (11): 159399.
Heller KE, et al (1997). Dental caries and dental fluorosis at varying water fluoride concentrations. Journal of Public
Health Dentistry.57: 136-143.
15 Hileman B. (1989). New studies cast doubt on fluoridation benefits. Chemical and Engineering News. May 8.
Hileman B. (1988). Fluoridation of water: Questions about health risks and benefits remain after more than 40
years. Chemical and Engineering News. August 1: 26-42.
Hirzy JW. (1999). Why the EPAs Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation. Press release from
National Treasury Employees Union. May 1.
20 Hong F, et al. (2001). Research on the effects of fluoride on child intellectual development under different
environments. Chinese Primary Health Care 15(3):56-57 (republished in Fluoride 2008; 41(2):15660).
Hong L, et al. (2006). Timing of fluoride intake in relation to development of fluorosis on maxillary central
incisors. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 34:299-309.
Hoover RN, et al. (1991a). Time trends for bone and joint cancers and osteosarcomas in the Surveillance,
25 Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. National Cancer Institute In: Review of Fluoride: Benefits and
Risks Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Fluoride of the Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and
Related Programs US Public Health Service. Appendix E.
Hoover RN, et al. (1991b). Time trends for bone and joint cancers and osteosarcomas in the Surveillance,
Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. National Cancer Institute In: Review of Fluoride: Benefits and
30 Risks Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Fluoride of the Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and
Related Programs US Public Health Service. Appendix F.
Inkovaara J, et al. (1975). Prophylactic fluoride treatment and aged bones. British Medical Journal. 3: 73-4.
Institute of Medicine. (1997). Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and
Fluoride. Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board.
35 National Academy Press.
Johnson WJ, et al. (1979). Fluoridation and bone disease in renal patients. In: Johansen E, Taves DR, Olsen TO,
Eds.Continuing Evaluation of the Use of Fluorides. AAAS Selected Symposium. Westview Press, Boulder,
Colorado. pp. 275-293.
Joseph S, Gadhia PK. (2000). Sister chromatid exchange frequency and chromosome aberrations in residents of
40 fluoride endemic regions of South Gujarat. Fluoride. 33: 154-158.

Page 44
Juncos LI, Donadio JV. (1972). Renal failure and fluorosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 222: 783-
5.
Kelly JV. (2000). Letter to Senator Robert Smith, Chairman of Environment and Public Works Committee, U.S.
Senate, August 14, 2000.
5 Kilborn LG, et al. (1950). Fluorosis with report of an advanced case. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 62:
135-141.
Kim FM et al. (2011). An Assessment of Bone Fluoride and Osteosarcoma. J. Dent.Res. July 28, 2011 (published
online).
Kiritsy MC, et al. (1996). Assessing fluoride concentrations of juices and juice-flavored drinks. Journal of the
10 American Dental Association. 127: 895-902.
Kishi K, Ishida T. (1993). Clastogenic activity of sodium fluoride in great ape cells. Mutation Research. 301:183-8.
Klein H. (1975). Dental fluorosis associated with hereditary diabetes insipidus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.
40(6):736-41.
Komrek AE (2005). A Bayesian Analysis of Multivariate Doubly-Interval-Censored Dental Data, Biostatistics. 6

15 (1):14555.
Kour K, Singh J. (1980). Histological finding of mice testes following fluoride ingestion. Fluoride. 13: 160-162.
Kumar A, Susheela AK. (1994). Ultrastructural studies of spermiogenesis in rabbit exposed to chronic fluoride
toxicity. International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies. 39:164-71.
Kumar JV, Green EL. (1998). Recommendations for fluoride use in children. NY State Dental Journal. 64: 40-7.
20 Kunzel W, Fischer T. (2000). Caries prevalence after cessation of water fluoridation in La Salud, Cuba. Caries
Research.34: 20- 5.
Kunzel W, et al. (2000). Decline in caries prevalence after the cessation of water fluoridation in former East
Germany. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 28: 382-389.
Kunzel W, Fischer T. (1997). Rise and fall of caries prevalence in German towns with different F concentrations in
25 drinking water.Caries Research. 31: 166-73.
Kurttio PN, et al. (1999). Exposure to natural fluoride in well water and hip fracture: A cohort analysis in
Finland. American Journal of Epidemiology. 150(8): 817-824.
Lalumandier JA, et al. (1995). The prevalence and risk factors of fluorosis among patients in a pediatric dental
practice.Pediatric Dentistry. 17: 19-25.
30 Levy SM, Guha-Chowdhury N. (1999). Total fluoride intake and implications for dietary fluoride
supplementation. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 59: 211-23.
Levy SM et al. (2009). Associations of fluoride intake with childrens bone measures at age 11. Community Dent
OralEpidemiol.37(5):416-26.
Levy SM, et al. (2010). Associations Between Fluorosis of Permanent Incisors and Fluoride Intake From Infant
35 Formula, Other Dietary Sources and Dentifrice During Early Childhood. JADA 141:1190-1201.
Li J, Yao L, Shao QL, Wu CY. 2004. Effects of high fluoride level on neonatal neurobehavioural
development. Chinese Journal of Endemiology 23:464-465 (republished in Fluoride 41:165-70).

Page 45
Li L. (2003). The biochemistry and physiology of metallic fluoride: action, mechanism, and implications. Critical
Reviews of Oral Biology and Medicine. 14: 100-14.
Li XS. (1995). Effect of fluoride exposure on intelligence in children. Fluoride 28: 189-192.
Li Y, et al. (2001). Effect of long-term exposure to fluoride in drinking water on risks of bone fractures. Journal of
5 Bone and Mineral Research 16: 932-9.
Lin Fa-Fu; et al (1991). The relationship of a low-iodine and high-fluoride environment to subclinical cretinism in
Xinjiang. Endemic Disease Bulletin 6(2):62-67 (republished in Iodine Deficiency Disorder Newsletter Vol. 7(3):24-
25).
Liu H, et al. (1988). Analysis of the effect of fluoride on male infertility in regions with reported high level of
10 fluoride (endemic fluorosis). Journal of the Medical Institute of Suzhou 8(4):297-99.
Locker D. (1999). Benefits and Risks of Water Fluoridation. An Update of the 1996 Federal-Provincial Sub-
committee Report. Prepared for Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.
Long YG, et al. (2002). Chronic fluoride toxicity decreases the number of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat
brain. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 24: 751-7.
15 Lu XH, et al. (2000). Study of the mechanism of neurone apoptosis in rats from the chronic fluorosis. Chinese
Journal of Epidemiology. 19: 96-98.
Lu Y, et al (2000). Effect of high-fluoride water on intelligence of children. Fluoride 33:74-78.
Luke J. (2001). Fluoride deposition in the aged human pineal gland. Caries Research 35: 125-128.
Luke J. (1997). The Effect of Fluoride on the Physiology of the Pineal Gland. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Surrey,
20 Guildord.
Maas RP et al. (2007). Effects of Fluoridation and Disinfection Agent Combinations on Lead Leaching from
Leaded-Brass Parts.Neurotoxicology. 28 (5): 102331.
Macek M, et al. (2006). Blood lead concentrations in children and method of water fluoridation in the United States,
1988-1994. Environmental Health Perspectives 114:130-134.
25 Mahaffey KR, Stone CL. (1976). Effect of High Fluorine (F) Intake on Tissue Lead (Pb)
Concentrations. Federation Proceedings. 35: 256.
Mahoney MC, et al. (1991). Bone cancer incidence rates in New York State: time trends and fluoridated drinking
water. American Journal of Public Health. 81: 475-9.
Mann J, et al. (1990). Fluorosis and dental caries in 6-8-year-old children in a 5 ppm fluoride area. Community
30 Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 18: 77-9.
Mann J, et al. (1987). Fluorosis and caries prevalence in a community drinking above-optimal fluoridated
water.Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 15: 293-5.
Marcus W. (1990). Memorandum from Dr. William Marcus, to Alan B. Hais, Acting Director Criteria & Standards
Division ODW, US EPA. May 1, 1990.
35 Marier J and Rose D. (1977). Environmental Fluoride. National Research Council of Canada. Associate Committee
on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality. NRCC No. 16081, Ottawa, Canada.

Page 46
Marshall TA, et al. (2004). Associations between Intakes of Fluoride from Beverages during Infancy and Dental
Fluorosis of Primary Teeth. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 23:108-16.Martin B. (1991). Scientific
Knowledge in Controversy: The Social Dynamics of the Fluoridation Debate. SUNY Press,Albany NY.
Martin B. (1991). Scientific Knowledge in Controversy: The Social Dynamics of the Fluoridation Debate. SUNY
5 Press, Albany NY.
Massler M, Schour I. (1952). Relation of endemic dental fluorosis to malnutrition. Journal of the American Dental
Association. 44: 156-165.
Masters R, et al. (2000). Association of silicofluoride treated water with elevated blood lead. Neurotoxicology. 21:
1091-1099.
10 Masters RD, Coplan M. (1999). Water treatment with silicofluorides and lead toxicity. International Journal of
Environmental Studies.56: 435-449.
Matsuo S, et al. (1998). Mechanism of toxic action of fluoride in dental fluorosis: whether trimeric G proteins
participate in the disturbance of intracellular transport of secretory ameloblast exposed to fluoride. Archives of
Toxicology. 72: 798- 806.
15 Maupome G, et al. (2001). Patterns of dental caries following the cessation of water fluoridation. Community
Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 29: 37-47.
McClure F. (1970). Water fluoridation, the search and the victory. US Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Washington DC.
McDonagh M, et al. (2000). A Systematic Review of Public Water Fluoridation. NHS Center for Reviews and
20 Dissemination, University of York, September 2000.
Meng Z, Zhang B. (1997). Chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in lymphocytes of workers at a phosphate
fertilizer factory.Mutation Research. 393: 283-288.
Mihashi, M. and Tsutsui,T.(1996). Clastogenic activity of sodium fluoride to rat vertebral body-derived cells in
culture.Mutation Research 368: 7-13.
25 Moolenburgh H. (1987). Fluoride: The Freedom Fight. Mainstream Publishing, Edinburgh.
Morgan L, et al. (1998). Investigation of the possible associations between fluorosis, fluoride exposure, and
childhood behavior problems. Pediatric Dentistry. 20: 244-252. Mullenix P, et al. (1995). Neurotoxicity of sodium
fluoride in rats. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 17: 169-177.
Mullenix P, et al. (1995). Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 17: 169-177.
30 Narayana MV, et al. (1994). Reversible effects of sodium fluoride ingestion on spermatozoa of the rat.
International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies. 39: 337-46.
Narayana MV, Chinoy NJ. (1994). Effect of fluoride on rat testicular steroidogenesis. Fluoride. 27: 7-12.
NHMRC (2007). National Health and Medical Research Council, A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of
Fluoridation,reference no. EH41, Australian Government, December 27, 2007.
35 National Research Council (1977). Drinking Water and Health, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC:
National Academy Press, 1977, 38889. National Research Council. (1993). Health Effects of Ingested
Fluoride. National Academy Press, Washington DC. National Sanitation Foundation International (NSF). (2000)
National Research Council. (1993). Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
National Sanitation Foundation International (NSF). (2000)

Page 47
National Toxicology Program [NTP] (1990). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Sodium Fluoride in F344/N
Rats and B6C3f1 Mice. Technical report Series No. 393. NIH Publ. No 91-2848. National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, N.C. The results of this study are summarized in the Department of Health
and Human Services report (DHHS,1991).
5 NRC (2006). National Research Council of the National Academies, Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific
Review of EPAs Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Neelam, K, et al. (1987). Incidence of prevalence of infertility among married male members of endemic fluorosis
district of Andhra Pradesh. In: Abstract Proc Conf Int Soc for Fluoride Res. Nyon, Switzerland.
ODuffy JD, et al. (1986). Mechanism of acute lower extremity pain syndrome in fluoride-treated osteoporotic
10 patients.American Journal of Medicine. 80: 561-6.
Olsson B. (1979). Dental findings in high-fluoride areas in Ethiopia. Community Dentistry and Oral
Epidemiology. 7: 51-6.
Orcel P, et al. (1990). Stress fractures of the lower limbs in osteoporotic patients treated with fluoride. Journal of
Bone and Mineral Research. 5(Suppl 1): S191-4.
15 Ortiz-Perez D, et al. (2003). Fluoride-induced disruption of reproductive hormones in men. Environmental

Research 93:20-30.
Paul V, et al. (1998). Effects of sodium fluoride on locomotor behavior and a few biochemical parameters in
rats. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 6: 187191.
Pendrys DG, Katz RV. (1998). Risk factors for enamel fluorosis in optimally fluoridated children born after the US
20 manufacturers decision to reduce the fluoride concentration of infant formula. American Journal
of Epidemiology 148:967-74.
Pinkham, JR, ed. (1999). Pediatric Dentistry Infancy Through Adolescence. 3rd Edition. WB Saunders Co,
Philadelphia.
Poureslami HR, et al. (2011). Intelligence quotient of 7 to 9 year-old children from an area with high fluoride in
25 drinking water. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene 3(4):61-64.
Public Health Service (PHS). (1993). Toward improving the oral health of Americans: an overview of oral health
status, resources, and care delivery. Public Health Reports. 108: 657-72.
Retief DH, et al. (1979). Relationships among fluoride concentration in enamel, degree of fluorosis and caries
incidence in a community residing in a high fluoride area. Journal of Oral Pathology. 8: 224-36.
30 Riggs BL, et al. (1990). Effect of Fluoride treatment on the Fracture Rates in Postmenopausal Women with
Osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine 322: 802-809.
Rocha-Amador D et al. (2009). Use of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test for neurotoxicity evaluation of
mixtures in children.Neurotoxicology 30(6):1149-54.
Rozier RG. (1999). The prevalence and severity of enamel fluorosis in North American children. Journal of Public
35 Health Dentistry.59: 239-46.
Sawan RMM et al. (2010) Fluoride Increases Lead Concentrations in Whole Blood and in Calcified Tissues from
Lead-Exposed Rats.Toxicology. 271 12: 2126.
Schlesinger ER et al. (1956) Newburgh-Kingston Caries-Fluorine Study. XIII. Pediatric Findings After Ten
Years, Journal of the American Dental Association. 52 (3):296306.

Page 48
Schnitzler CM, et al. (1990). Bone fragility of the peripheral skeleton during fluoride therapy for
osteoporosis. Clinical Orthopaedics.(261): 268-75.
Seholle RH. (1984). Preserving the perfect tooth (editorial). Journal of the American Dental Association. 108: 448.
Seow WK, Thomsett MJ. (1994). Dental fluorosis as a complication of hereditary diabetes insipidus: studies of six
5 affected patients. Pediatr Dent. 16(2):128-32.
Seppa L, et al. (2000). Caries trends 1992-98 in two low-fluoride Finnish towns formerly with and without
fluoride. Caries Research.34: 462-8.
Seraj B, et al. (2006). [Effect of high fluoride concentration in drinking water on childrens intelligence]. [Study in
Persian] Journal of Dental Medicine 19(2):80-86.
10 Shao Q, et al. (2000). Influence of free radical inducer on the level of oxidative stress in brain of rats with
fluorosis.Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 34(6):330-2.
Sharma R et al. (2008). Fluoride Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Inhibits Protein Synthesis and
Secretion. Environ Health Perspect. 116:11421146.
Shashi A. (2003). Histopathological investigation of fluoride-induced neurotoxicity in rabbits. Fluoride. 36: 95-105.
15 Shea JJ, et al. (1967). Allergy to fluoride. Annals of Allergy. 25:388-91.
Sheth FJ, et al. (1994). Sister chromatid exchanges: A study in fluorotic individuals of North Gujurat. Fluoride. 27:
215-219.
Shiboski CH, et al. (2003). The association of early childhood caries and race/ethnicity among California preschool
children. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 63:38-46.
20 Shivarajashankara YM , et al. (2002). Brain lipid peroxidation and antioxidant systems of young rats in chronic
fluoride intoxication.Fluoride. 35: 197-203.
Shivarajashankara YM , et al. (2002). Histological changes in the brain of young fluoride-intoxicated

rats. Fluoride. 35:12-21.
Singh A, Jolly SS. (1970). Fluorides and Human Health. World Health Organization. pp 239-240.
25 Singh A, et al. (1963). Endemic fluorosis: epidemiological, clinical and biochemical study of chronic fluoride
intoxication in Punjab.Medicine. 42: 229-246.
Spencer AJ et al. (1996).Water Fluoridation in Australia. Community Dental Health. 13 (suppl. 2):2737.
Spittle B. Fluoride Fatigue: Is Fluoride in Your Drinking Waterand from Other Sources Making You Sick?
(Dunedin, New Zealand: Paua Press, 2008).
30 Spittle B, et al. (1998). Intelligence and fluoride exposure in New Zealand Children (abstract). Fluoride 31:S13
Sprando RL, et al. (1998). Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect spermatogenesis: a morphometric study.
Food and Chemical Toxicology. 36: 1117-24.
Sprando RL, et al. (1997). Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect spermatogenesis in the rat. Food and
Chemical Toxicology. 35: 881-90.
35 Sprando RL, et al. (1996). Effect of intratesticular injection of sodium fluoride on spermatogenesis. Food and
ChemicalToxicology. 34: 377-84.

Page 49
Stannard JG, et al. (1991). Fluoride Levels and Fluoride Contamination of Fruit Juices. Journal of Clinical Pediatric
Dentistry. 16: 38-40.
Stecher P, et al. (1960). The Merck Index of Chemicals and Drugs. Merck & Co., Inc, Rathway NJ. p. 952
Strunecka A, Patocka J. (1999). Pharmacological and toxicological effects of aluminofluoride

5 complexes. Fluoride 32:230-242.
Sun ZR, et al. (2000). Effects of high fluoride drinking water on the cerebral functions of mice. Chinese Journal of
Epidemiology. 19: 262-263.
Susheela AK. (1993). Prevalence of endemic fluorosis with gastrointestinal manifestations in people living in some
North-Indian villages. Fluoride. 26: 97-104.
10 Susheela AK and Jethanandani P (1996). Circulating testosterone levels in Skeletal Fluorosis patients. Clinical
Toxicology.34 (2): 1-7.
Susheela AK, Kumar A. (1991). A study of the effect of high concentrations of fluoride on the reproductive organs
of malerabbits, using light and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Reproductive Fertility. 92: 353-60.
Sutton P. (1996). The Greatest Fraud: Fluoridation. Lorne, Australia: Kurunda Pty, Ltd.
15 Sutton P. (1960). Fluoridation: Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials. Melbourne University Press. Second
Edition.
Sutton, P. (1959). Fluoridation: Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials. Melbourne University Press. First
Edition.
Teotia M, et al. (1998). Endemic chronic fluoride toxicity and dietary calcium deficiency interaction syndromes of
20 metabolic bone disease and deformities in India: year 2000. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 65: 371-81.
Teotia SPS, et al. (1976). Symposium on the non-skeletal phase of chronic fluorosis: The Joints. Fluoride. 9: 19-24.
Tsutsui T, Suzuki N, Ohmori M, Maizumi H. (1984). Cytotoxicity, chromosome aberrations and unscheduled DNA
synthesis in cultured human diploid fibroblasts induced by sodium fluoride. Mutation Research. 139:193-8.
Tye CE et al. (2011). Fluoride Does not Inhibit Enamel Protease Activity. J Dent Res. 90(4): 489-494.
25 U.S. EPA (2011). EPA and HHS Announce New Scientific Assessments and Actions on Fluoride / Agencies
working together to maintain benefits of preventing tooth decay while preventing excessive exposure. Joint press
release with DHHS, Jan 7, 2011.
Varner JA et al. (1998). Chronic Administration of Aluminum-Fluoride or Sodium-Fluoride to Rats in Drinking

Water:Alterations in Neuronal and Cerebrovascular Integrity. Brain Research. 78 (12): 28498.
30 Waldbott GL, et al. (1978). Fluoridation: The Great Dilemma. Coronado Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas.
Waldbott GL. (1965). A Struggle with Titans. Carlton Press, NY.
Wang C, et al. (2000). Treatment Chemicals contribute to Arsenic Levels. Opflow. (Journal of the American Water
Works Association. October 2000.
Wang Y, et al. (1997). Changes of coenzyme Q content in brain tissues of rats with fluorosis. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi
35 Xue Za Zhi. 31: 330-3.
Wang X, et al. (2001). Effects of high iodine and high fluorine on childrens intelligence and thyroid
function. Chinese Journal of Endemiology 20(4):288-90.
Page 50
Warren JJ et al. (2009). Considerations on Optimal Fluoride Intake Using Dental Fluorosis and Dental Caries
Outcomes A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 69 (2): 11115.
WHO (Online). WHO Oral Health Country/Area Profile Programme. Department of Noncommunicable Diseases
Surveillance/Oral Health. WHO Collaborating Centre, Malm University, Sweden.
5 Williams JE, et al. (1990). Community water fluoride levels, preschool dietary patterns, and the occurrence of
fluoride enamel opacities. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 50: 276-81.
Wu DQ, Wu Y. (1995). Micronucleus and sister chromatid exchange frequency in endemic fluorosis. Fluoride. 28:
125-127.
Xiang Q, et al. (2003a). Effect of fluoride in drinking water on childrens intelligence. Fluoride. 36: 84-94.
10 Xiang Q. (2003b). Blood lead of children in Wamiao-Xinhuai intelligence study. Fluoride. 36: 138.
Xu Y, et al. (1994). The effect of fluorine on the level of intelligence in children. Endemic Diseases Bulletin 9(2):83-
84.
Yang Y, et al. (1994). The effects of high levels of fluoride and iodine on intellectual ability and the metabolism of
fluoride and iodine. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 15(4):296-98 (republished in Fluoride 2008; 41:336-339).
15 Yao Y, et al. (1997). Comparative assessment of the physical and mental development of children in endemic
fluorosis area with water improvement and without water improvement. Literature and Information on Preventive
Medicine 3(1):42-43.
Yao Y, et al. (1996). Analysis on TSH and intelligence level of children with dental Fluorosis in a high fluoride
area. Literature and Information on Preventive Medicine 2(1):26-27.
20 Yu Y et al. (1996) Neurotransmitter and receptor changes in the brains of fetuses from areas of endemic fluorosis.
ChineseJ Endemiology 15: 257-259 (republished in Fluoride 41(2):134-8).
Zakrzewska H, et al. (2002). In vitro influence of sodium fluoride on ram semen quality and enzyme
activities. Fluoride.35: 153-160.
Zhang, R., et al. (2009). A stable and sensitive testing system for potential carcinogens based on DNA damage-
25 induced gene expression in human HepG2 cell. Toxicology in Vitro. 23:158-165.
Zhang Z, et al. (2001). [Effects of selenium on the damage of learning-memory ability of mice induced by
fluoride]. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu.30: 144-6.
Zhang Z, et al. (1999). [Effect of fluoride exposure on synaptic structure of brain areas related to learning-memory
in mice] [Article in Chinese]. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 28:210-2.
30 Zhao ZL, et al. (1995). The influence of fluoride on the content of testosterone and cholesterol in rat. Fluoride. 28:
128-130.
Ziegelbecker R. (1970). A critical review on the fluorine caries problem. Fluoride. 3: 71-79.
Ziegelbecker R. (1981). Fluoridated Water and Teeth. Fluoride. 14 (3): 12328.
Zhai JX, et al. (2003). Studies on fluoride concentration and cholinesterase activity in rat hippocampus. Zhonghua
35 Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 21: 102-4.
Zhao XL, Wu JH. (1998). Actions of sodium fluoride on acetylcholinesterase activities in rats. Biomedical and
Environmental Sciences. 11: 1-6

Page 51
Zhao LB, et al (1996). Effect of high-fluoride water supply on childrens intelligence. Fluoride. 29: 190-192.
END QUOTE
QUOTE
5 Fw: See Attached
People
Bev Pattenden <lbpattenden@bordernet.com.au>
29 Apr at 10:24 PM
10 To
Leonard Clampett
Hide
CC
Alan Manson
15 Chris Shannon
Donna Aussie
Doug Harrison
Dr. Isaac Goldman
and 16 more...
20 Hide
Attachments
OPEN LETTER TO POLITICIANS OF AUSTRALIA April 2017.docx
Download All
Message body
25
Hi Len. Any chance that you could send this out to your comprehensive list of politicians
and Senators?
Much appreciated if you could.
If you could send me a copy, I would appreciate it.
30 Cheers
Bev Pattenden.
From: Bev Pattenden

Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:18 PM
35 Subject: See Attached
Please see attached Open Letter. I posted it on Facebook, but it was only there for about
30 seconds !!!
40 Ill send it to someone who has all the email addresses of all politicians, hopefully he will
send it out.
Bev.
45 1 Attachment
OPEN LETTER TO POLITICIANS OF AUSTRALIA April 2017 .docx
AN OPEN LETTER TO POLITICIANS OF AUSTRALIA
Members of House of Representatives (The Peoples House) and Senators (April 2017)
50 "When a government loses respect for its Constitution and the people lose respect for their
government you are treading on dangerous ground. That is what happened in my country
(Sri Lanka) and there was a 30 year war with over 100,000 killed before it was over".
Professor Suri Ratnapala, Queensland.

Page 52
1. The video series "The Truth About vaccines" has just been viewed across the world by hundreds of
thousands of people interested in the truth. It is a 7 part series of over 1 to 2 hour each episode, in
which many doctors and qualified professionals spoke the truth regardless of the risks to their careers
and lives of themselves and their families.
5
EPISODE 1 - The History of Vaccines, Smallpox, Vaccine Safety & the Current CDC Schedule
EPISODE 2 - Whats in a Vaccine? Are Vaccines Effective? ... and ... What About Polio?
10 EPISODE 3 - In Depth Analysis of the MMR and DTaP Vaccines & Vaccinating for the Greater Good
EPISODE 4 - Examining Influenza, the HIB and Pneumococcal Vaccines & Herd Immunity
EPISODE 5 - Considering the HPV and Hepatitis B Vaccines, SIDS & Shaken Baby Syndrome
15
EPISODE 6 - A Closer Look at the CDC, Chicken Pox and Rotavirus Vaccines & Retroviruses
EPISODE 7 - Natural Immunization, Homeoprophylaxis & Fundamental Freedom of Choice
20 https://www.facebook.com/thetruthaboutvaccines/
We are continually told that "vaccines are safe" while there is NO SCIENCE available to
confirm that assumption. In fact Robert Kennedy Jnr. has offered a reward of $100,000 to
anyone who can come up with the science to prove their safety. As yet no one has come
25 forward.
2. Dr. Judy Wilyman PhD (Australia) says:
" In my opinion experimenting on the population with drugs that have not been proven safe or
effective in combination with each other would be a crime against humanity when - informed consent
without coercion, and personal and religious exemptions, are removed. And when a government claims
30 this practice is safe and effective when the hard evidence to support this claim has never been
investigated".
www.vaccinationdecisions.net
"In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals
35 pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-
type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals
pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is
not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits
after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is not risk-free; 3)
40 outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect
vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral
diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is
available for those who may be exposed to these diseases.
Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school
45 setting against children who are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely
unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious objectors poses no undue public health
risk."
~ Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD - Harvard Immunologist.
50 Many politicians, including Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, and those advising them, are
guilty of "conflict of interests", having financial interests in the vaccine industry. The Prime
Minister callously added insult to injury by publicly inciting all State Governments to make
sure they promote and enforce more and more vaccination. This is unacceptable at every
level.

Page 53
I have a public facebook group called "Wrong Vaccines" with 3200 members (worldwide)
and I am linked to other Anti-Vax/Pro Choice groups (last count was over 400,000) but of
course there are millions more that I am not aware of. So we citizens are no longer lone
voices in the wilderness, but part of an awakening of the masses demanding change in the
5 medical procedures and penalties imposed by governments who want to use their own people,
as disposal units for an ever increasing number of toxic, neurologically damaging and
potentially killer vaccines.for $ profit. Never before in the history of mankind has injecting
pregnant women with diseases and poisonous concoctions entered the minds of normal right
minded people, reinforcing our belief that vaccination is part of the population reduction
10 agenda.
3. Some Vaccine damaged children are now getting dangerous as they get older and harder to
handle. These are mostly in their 20's, because it was around 1996 that the deadly mercury filled
concoctions were given en masse. Some will have to be institutionalized, much to the sorrow and
anguish of their exhausted parents. These young adults are still in nappies and non verbal,
15 trapped in their own bodies and unable to communicate. IT IS A DISASTER BEYOND
COMPREHENSION OF THE MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION thanks to the cover-up by
mainstream media, CDC, FDA and governments worldwide.
We need a new style Nuremberg trial in the USA where most of these vaccines and
schedules were initiated, especially the United Nations WHO, who instigated the
20 "Decade of vaccines 2010-2020". They still have hundreds more in the pipeline in the
planned "cradle to grave" agenda.
SEND THE GUILTY TO JAIL, and charge them with Crimes against Humanity. Let
their family keep their house if they are married or have children (because we only want
the guilty not their families..............not sure about that, after all look at how many
25 families they have destroyed?) but SELL ALL OTHER ASSETS and establish
professional centres where these young adults can be treated, or their parents helped
with known alternate methods and diets, and/or respite, which we now know can be
successful to a certain degree.
4. The No Jab No Pay Bill is unconstitutional and unacceptable to any country claiming to be a free
30 society.
SOCIAL SERVICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (NO JAB, NO PAY) BILL 2015

In a 1946 referendum a clause was added to Section 51(xxiii) of the Constitution which
prevents the government from forcing people to medicate.
This amendment to the Constitution Sect.51(xxiiiA), allows for the granting of various social
35 services but not so as to authorise any form of civil conscription.
This means that government or those acting on its behalf, cannot force you to have a child
vaccinated in order to maintain benefit payments.
Also Sect 28 of the Federal Crimes Act (1914) states:
"Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes
40 with the free exercise of performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall
be guilty of an offence" The penalty is up to three years imprisonment.
Could also be used for the No Jab No Play State Laws.
PUBLIC HEALTH AMENDMENT (VACCINATION OF CHILDREN ATTENDING
CHILD CARE FACILITIES) BILL 2013 NSW
45 Education is a "political right" as is "informed consent" to medical treatment.
https://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/10-review-state-and-territory-
legislation/informed-consent-medical-treatment
Section 109 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.............."When a law
of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the
50 former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Page 54
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
5. https://law.wustl.edu/harris/crimesagainsthumanity/?page_id=469
Section (k) seems appropriate for Vaccine death and maiming, seeing we are in a "Vaccine
War" which has been going on for 200 years, based on flawed theories and lies.
5 The International Law Commissions Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and
Security of Mankind (1996), Article 18:
any of the following acts, when committed in a systematic manner or on a large scale and
instigated or directed by a Government or by any organization or group:
(a) Murder;
10 (b) Extermination;
(c) Torture;
(d) Enslavement;
(e) Persecution on political, racial, religious or ethnic grounds;
(f) Institutionalized discrimination on racial, ethnic or religious grounds involving the
15 violation of fundamental human rights and freedoms and resulting in seriously disadvantaging
a part of the population;
(g) Arbitrary deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(h) Arbitrary imprisonment;
(i) Forced disappearance of persons;
20 (j) Rape, enforced prostitution and other forms of sexual abuse;
(k) Other inhumane acts which severely damage physical or mental integrity, health or
human dignity, such as mutilation and severe bodily harm.
If Elected Representatives don't think it is a war, then you need to do some more
25 credible research and stop believing those who benefit financially by the continuation and
expansion of this deadly ritual. Vaccination did not stop these diseases. Better living
conditions after WWll, clean water, better food, plumbing, sewerage did. I am an eye
witness to the whole story from the beginning of vaccination in Australia in 1954, until now.
30 6. If you want to remain in office and retain the support of your constituents you
need to get Involved in this vaccine war and choose sides now, before it erupts into rebellion and you
are recorded on the wrong side of history. If this outrageous attack on our freedom by the deep state of
the New World Order is not stopped, their next step will be mandatory microchipping of the whole
planet, and you and your family will not escape (Mark of the Beast 666, the final event) but
will be
35 responsible for not doing anything to stop it when you had the opportunity to
protect people from this demonic agenda.
"Then I heard a loud voice from the temple telling the seven Angels , Go and pour out on
the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of God.
40 So the first angel went and poured his bowl on the earth and foul and evil sores came upon
the men who bore the mark of the beast and worshipped its image" Revelation 16:1-2
Bev Pattenden
5th generation Australian.
45
www.facebook.com/groups/wrongvaccines
21st April 2017
END QUOTE
50 We have the same issue with vaccines. When people are lied to by politicians and ell the harm of
those kind if chemical cocktails cannot be ignored either. A child could not show any mental
Page 55
issues at the time but later it may eventuate. When for example we are looking at Rett
Syndrome, this is an medical issue mainly affecting females but sometimes a girl may be an
active child and then get struck down at a later age, even as a teenager and then suddenly may
lose speech, mobility, etc. Likewise injecting a child with a cocktail of toxins including mercury
5 may not be as devastating for one child while it can destroy the life of another child. I understand
no reliable research has been undertaken as to the long term after effect of the poisons and the
huge amount of them, including preservatives in food, that is entering a human body to what
extent it harm the mental health of a person.
.
10 As the Bourke Street carnage was dealing with a motor vehicle I view it also is to be considered
if the way penalties are applied in Victoria is appropriate. For sure a person on a pension facing a
fine (that goes up and up to fill government coffers) could be devastating to the senior citizen
while some financial well of person would find no problem to pay the fine. Some in fact may
rent a vehicle and then avoid any demerit points to their license. Police themselves are often
15 claiming that they do not know who was in violation of a road rule, etc. As if the police vehicles
used are not booked out against a specific police officer. What we therefore may need is to have
amended laws that a driver who is found by a court to have been in violation of road rules and
is convicted then should be assessed upon his taxable income to pay a penalty. And where the
corporation fails to disclose the identity of the motor vehicle user then CEO (If there is no CEO
20 then the most senior board member) must be deemed to have been driving the vehicle and cop
the relevant demerit points and penalty. In that way the CEO/board member will make sure that
the company will have proper records and keep them up to date!
QUOTE
25 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-
39686894?ns_mchannel=email&ns_source=inxmail_newsletter&ns_campaign=bbcnewsdaily
Stricter punishments for speeding offences in England and Wales

19 minutes ago (24-04-2017)
30 From the section UK These ar e external links and will open in a new wi ndow
Image copyright Getty Images
Tougher punishments for the most serious speeding offences have come into force in
England and Wales.
35 Under new guidelines, fines for drivers caught doing 51mph in a 30mph zone or 101mph on a
motorway will start from 150% of weekly income, rather than the previous level of 100%.
The Sentencing Council said it wanted a "clear increase in penalty" as the seriousness of
offending increases.
Motoring groups have broadly welcomed the new guidelines for magistrates.

Page 56
'Extreme offenders'
The new measures follow responses to a consultation.
It said previous guidelines did not properly take into account the increase in potential harm that
can result as speed above the limit rises.
5 Fines will also be increased for when motorists drive at 41mph or faster where there is a 20mph
limit.
However, because the maximum fines allowed by law remains the same, speeding drivers cannot
be fined more than 1,000 unless the offence takes place on a motorway, where the limit is
2,500.
10 Some 244 people were killed in crashes that occurred when a driver was breaking the speed limit
on Britain's roads in 2015.
AA president Edmund King said it was right that "extreme offenders" were punished
"severely".
15 He added: "Responsible drivers will welcome the changes coming into force today.
"The majority of drivers who keep to the correct speed, as well as driving to the conditions,
won't be affected.
"It is only those who deliberately drive dangerously who will end up in court."
Do magistrates have to stick to the guidelines?
20 Image caption
It is all about the "interest of justice", according to the council

Page 57
Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless a judge or magistrate feels it is not in the
interests of justice to do so
If a judge or magistrate believes that a guideline prevents the correct sentence from being
given in an exceptional case, he or she can sentence outside of the guideline
5 Guidelines set sentencing ranges within the maximum for the offence as set out in current
legislation
When legislation changes, guidelines are amended as appropriate
Source: Sentencing Council
RAC Foundation director Steve Gooding said while the new measures "underline how
10 seriously the courts take speeding offences", the limit on fines means there is not a "level
playing field".
He also questioned whether police officers have enough resources to ensure the tougher
punishments have an impact on road safety.
Mr Gooding said: "While we broadly support linking the amount of the penalty with income, the
15 cap on the level of fines means that this link is broken for high-income drivers - hardly a level
playing field."
Gary Rae, campaigns director for road safety charity Brake, said: "Toughening the fines and
penalties for speeding is long overdue.
"I hope that magistrates ensure the new sentences are consistently applied."
20 Sentence levels for less serious offences are not changing
END QUOTE
The problem is that with the fury of new legislation not a single person, and that means including
politicians, lawyers/judges would possibly be able to know and understand every piece of
25 legislation being enacted. Indeed, I exposed in in previous successful appeals that
legislation/proclamations at times is not properly published in the Gazette and at times not
available at all.
WATSON v LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374;( JUDGE3 STEPHEN J.)
QUOTE
30 As Scott L.J. said in Blackpool Corporation v. Locker (1948) 1 KB 349, at p
361 , speaking there of sub-delegated legislation, "there is one quite general
question . . . of supreme importance to the continuance of the rule of law
under the British constitution, namely, the right of the public affected to
know what that law is". The maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse forms the
35 "working hypothesis on which the rule of law rests in British democracy" but to
operate it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is accessible to
the public - in the sense, of course, that at any rate its legal advisers have access to it at
any moment, as of right".
END QUOTE
40 Again;
QUOTE
it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is
accessible to the public - in the sense, of course,
END QUOTE
Page 58
Another problem is that I discovered that VicRoads is putting demerit points against a persons
license without any legal justification. Then we have reports that the number of people driving
disqualified is increasing, when in fact as I explored many are wrongly/unlawfully disqualified.
Tell that to a professional driver who lost his job, his family mortgage repayments, and his
5 family because someone at VicRoads wrongly put demerit points against his license where none
should have been. Tell this to a driver fined and having demerit points against his license for
driving an unregistered vehicle when in fact, so I was personally advised and given the
understanding by a VicRoad manager they are holding thousands upon thousands of paid
registration monies in a file unallocated to specific licenses/registration renewals. As a matter of
10 fact I came across this when query why my sons license had not been extended and was given
the understanding it was not paid. I produced bank records with the details but the manager (after
some search) came back no records showed such payments. I urged to look again and the
complaint was there were thousands of payments not allocated and it would take time to go
through it all. I explained I would wait. Well then another manager got involved and within
15 minutes the payment was located. It means that VicRoads administration or better to state
misadministration/maladministration is the real culprit where people are unduly dragged through
the courts and may very well have paid for license renewals/registration renewals but unable to
prove at the time with records having done so. It is quite frankly beyond me why VicRoads
doesnt bother to refund the monies if it cannot allocate (at least so it claims) to the payer so that
20 the payer is aware the monies are not put towards a license/registration renewal. The cancelation
of the window registration sticker also has resulted that people borrow a car in good faith and
then get pulled over driving an unregistered vehicle. They simply have no way to be able to
check if the vehicle is registered or not, because the Victorian Government no longer issue
window registration labels. The owner of the vehicle may have paid the renewal but VicRoads
25 may have wrongly placed into a holding account without allocating it.
.
One problem associated with it might be that often payment details are miniscule and so a payer
may in error used an incorrect number. I often have to resort to using a microscope to read the
small letter print of the relevant numbers. There appear to me no system in place where the
30 moment renewal of a license/registration has not been recorded as paid then a written notification
is provider to the registered owner/license holder until; months later. Why wait months and not
do so at the date of the payment is claimed not to have been received?
Then we also have the absurdity that the Sheriffs Office can suspend a drivers license/motor
35 vehicle registration as to unpaid fines. Moment let me get this. The Sheriffs Office goes after
people for unpaid fines that may have absolutely nothing to do with as driver license and/or
motor vehicle registration or even the condition of a motor vehicle. As I discovered in the years
of prior investigation before actually having a court case, as I prepare in advance even before a
court case exist expecting that soon or later there will be a court case, councils are fining people
40 allegedly within the provisions of the Country Fire Authority Act 1958 for not mowing their
nature Strip, now up to $2,000.00! Yes that is up to two thousand dollars. I had this before the
court that the Country Fire Authority Act 1958 doesnt at allow councils to fine anyone regarding
properties held by the State or under delegated powers by a council. Yet, Whittlesea Council on
its website simply advertises people can be fined for not mowing their nature strips. So, a council
45 then places the details before the unconstitutional Infringement Court which then issue
unconstitutional orders/warrant and the Sherriffs Office then as a terrorist confiscate motor
vehicles if the monies plus cost are not paid and this is deemed to be law and Order? Come on,
road-rage is escalating because people feel powerless. The judiciary going along with this
highway kind of robbery as much guilty to it all. Yet, when I through lawyers overpaid water
50 rates acting within the Powers of Attorney, then the SRO (State Revenue Office) while admitting
holding the monies refuses to hand back it all. It only is willing to refund part of the monies and
this I declined. So, why is it that when it comes to the state government actually owning monies,
Page 59
and so admitted, cannot be fined or have some automatic suspension of the Premiers drivers
license and motor vehicle registration, when the legal principles in the constitution is that all
people are equal before the courts? After all I cannot approach the Infringement Court to
likewise issue orders against the state! As such the Infringement Court is not for this also
5 constitutionally valid.
Why is it that neither would the Infringement court accept any application by me (not being a
permissible authorised person to do so) for refund of all unconstitutional rates which are
unconstitutional delegated land taxation. (See Sydney Council v Commonwealth HCA 1904 re
delegated State land taxation powers)
10 One may argue to go to court!
Hansard 20-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS:
I think it is advisable that private people should not be put to the expense of having important
15 questions of constitutional law decided out of their own pockets.
END QUOTE
Well, the problem is that judges of the High Court of Australia and for that other judicial officers
also, have their own mind-set to at times not allow to accept even the filing of an Application
within s75(v) regardless their conduct is unconstitutional and/or order cost regarding litigation on
20 constitutional basis.
In my view the courts are complicit to the fraud/terrorism upon the community!
Let me use another example, as I was placing before the court at the time in the Colosimo case.
25 The issue of FEE SIMPLE is that the Government can only do what the Crown could do. Yet,
despite this the Parliament/Government is terrorising FEE SIMPLE holders, even as I understand
it that many years ago people holding properties in FEE SIMPLE were prohibited to build on
their land such as at Phillips Island, obviously so the government could purchase it cheaply. And
I understand the High Court of Australia wrongly claimed that the States do not have to provide
30 proper compensations as the Commonwealth must do for acquisition. As the States are created
within section 106 subject to this constitution then all legal principles embedded in the
constitution applies to the states also.
And on and on it goes and well people are becoming severely frustrated in it all. As I exposed in
my successful appeals regarding the unconstitutional compulsory voting, the purported Victorian
35 Constitution Act 1975 is not a constitution at all and is not a constitutional valid constitution.
HANSARD 10-03-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of parliamentary
40 sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark on federation we throw
parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer supreme. Our parliaments at present are
not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They have not only the power of legislation, but the power
of amending their constitutions. That must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary
sovereignty. No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the
45 power of changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of being vested in
one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary sovereignty is dispensed
with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring into existence a powerful judiciary
which towers above all powers, legislative and executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter
50 of the constitution.
END QUOTE

QUOTE Mr. THYNNE:

Page 60
The constitution of this federation will not be charged with the duty of resisting privileged classes, for
the whole power will be vested in the people themselves. They are the complete legislative power of the
whole of these colonies, and they shall be so. From [start page 106] them will rise, first of all, the federal
constitution which we are proposing to establish, and in the next place will come the legislative powers of the
5 several colonies. The people will be the authority above and beyond the separate legislatures, and the
royal prerogative exercised, in their interest and for their benefit, by the advice of their ministers will be
practically vested in them. They will exercise the sovereignty of the states, they will be charged with the
full power and dignity of the state, and it is from them that we must seek the giving to each of those bodies
that will be in existence concurrently the necessary powers for their proper management and existence. Each
10 assembly, each legislature, whether state or federal existing under this constitution, will be as Dicey
again says-a merely subordinate law-making body whose laws will be valid, whilst within the authority
conferred upon it by the constitution, but invalid and unconstitutional if they go beyond the limits of
such authority.
END QUOTE
15
QUOTE
Mr. GLYNN.-I think they would, because it is fixed in the Constitution. There is no special court, but
the general courts would undoubtedly protect the states. What Mr. Isaacs seeks to do is to prevent the
20 question of ultra vires arising after a law has been passed.
[start page 2004]
Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
END QUOTE
25 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his mind to the subject he
will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the states Parliament be taken into court
30 the court is bound to give an interpretation according to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may
be a good law passed by "the sovereign will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which
I do not care much about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the
Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains some remnant of
parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either side to attack each other's laws.
35 END QUOTE
The Victorian Constitution Act 1975 to my knowledge was never put to the State electors in a
State referendum to be approved as a constitution and therefore is not a constitution at all.
It by this then also questions the Coroners Court judicial authority as if it is operating
40 under the pretext of the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 then in my view it has
no legal authority at all.
If one desires to enforce the rule of law than one has to commence oneself as to once
constitutional rights to do so!
45 The questions therefore will be to consider the validity of any judicial conduct associated with
the person who allegedly caused the Bourke Street mayhem, deaths, etc. This as to merely
assume everything was above board would be bias. And with it the Coroners Court own
legitimacy must be placed in question considering what I stated above.
50 QUOTE Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2d 906, 910.
Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." and "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed
and must be decided.
END QUOTE
55 QUOTE Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 2nd 906 at 910,
Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even on final determination.
END QUOTE
Page 61
QUOTE Burns v. Sup. Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1.

Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts
in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities.
5 END QUOTE
QUOTE Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27

Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its
proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term. .
10 END QUOTE
QUOTE Hagens v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533,

Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven
END QUOTE
15
QUOTE HALSBURYS LAWS OF AUSTRALIA says under (130-13460):
Consent to summary jurisdiction The consent to be tried summarily must be clear and unequivocal
and a failure to carry out the procedures for obtaining the consent will deprive the court of jurisdiction
to determine the matters summarily.
20 END QUOTE
QUOTE Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp., 478 So. 2d. 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)
Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal.
END QUOTE
25
QUOTE In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846.
Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear
is void, ab initio.
END QUOTE
30
QUOTE (Jagens v. Lavine, 415 S.Ct.768).
Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven.
END QUOTE
35 QUOTE Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215.

There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.
END QUOTE
QUOTE Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F Supp. 150.
40 Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.
END QUOTE
QUOTE Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).

The law provides that once State and Federal jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.
45 END QUOTE
QUOTE Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.
Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks
jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action.
50 END QUOTE
QUOTE Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.

Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is
deprived of juris.
55 END QUOTE
QUOTE Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732.

A universal principle as old as the law is that a proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are a nullity
and its judgment therein without effect either on person or property.
60 END QUOTE
QUOTE Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416.

The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction."
Page 62
END QUOTE
QUOTE Standard v. Olsen, 74 S. Ct. 768,

No sanctions can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction.
5 END QUOTE
QUOTE Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389.

Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.
END QUOTE
10
QUOTE Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 583.
When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of the
municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts in
administering or enforcing statutes do not act judicially, but merely ministerially.
15 END QUOTE
.
QUOTE Thompson v. Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L.Ed. 381; Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3L. Ed. 471.
Where there is absence of jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings are a nullity and
confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no justification, and may be rejected upon direct
20 collateral attack.
END QUOTE
No part of my submission(s) must be considered to somehow try to get any offender so to say of
the hook. I am about trying to save lives and that can only come about if all judicial officers
25 show due and proper respect to the constitutional framework that exist and only act within this
constitutional framework and not despite of it.
Never mind the volume of my writings, as in the end what is important is that if the Corners
Court does decide to have jurisdiction, not that I seek to imply it has, it then will consider all
matters appropriately and not merely become so to say a mouth piece for the Government of the
30 day to get it so to say of the hook and ignore relevant issues.
.
When I represented a barrister who was in fear of his own life to even attend to a court hearing
then surely we do have a major problem. When one has so called Protection Officers (PSO) in
the Courts rather than Court appointed security staff then we have a gross intimidation by the
35 government.
Any person who is fleeing from being pursued by law enforcement authorities can find sanctuary
in the court precinct and then it is the Chief Justice of the Court who must decide the right of that
person if that person should be handed over or not. This means a person insisting on rights
governing certain court orders can rely upon the Chief Justice to ensure those rights are not
40 unduly violate, whereas those working for the
government in the courts could nilly-willy prevent a person such sanctuary because of the bias
working for the Government of the Day.
What we need and I view but we do not have, is an impartial/independent court system, where
the Chief Justice is and remains the ultimate decision maker and no Government can interfere
45 with this. It means also that the chief Justice must be in sole command of who has access to court
computers and court files, security, etc. We need for this a total overhaul of the court systems.
If the Coroners Court is truly impartial/independent from the Government of the Day
then why was there never any Port Arthurs killings coroners investigation, I wonder?
50
Why is it that Australian soldiers from Victoria killed during the unconstitutional armed
murderous invasion into the sovereign country Iraq are not then subject to a coroners inquest? Is
it because the judiciary as like I view the High Court of Australia does is so to say towing the
line with the Government of the Day? Little wonder then that people seeing this kind of
55 murderous mayhem by Governments then loose respect for what is purported to be Law and
Order/Rule of Law when the very worst offenders are those in Government?
Page 63
Are judicial officers more concerned about their own future employment prospect, such as
appointments, that they do not desire so to say to rock the boat and rather keep quite? After all
why is it that the killing of so many in Port Arthur mass murder event somehow wasnt worthy to
have a coronial inquiry regarding at the very least those Victorians who died there?
5 Why is it that Victorian soldiers who died in battle in an unconstitutional invasion into Iraq as
denied a proper coronial inquiry? Is it to protect the as I view it criminals in government from
being held legally accountable for mass murder, crimes against humanity, treason, mass murder,
etc? Then no surprise to me, regardless I may condemn this, that others will take the law into
their own hands likewise and goon mass killings, after all what is good for the Goose is good for
10 the Gander! This is why it is so essential we have a competent coroner who is concerned about
the Rule of Law as provided for by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
to which the states are bound by their creation within section 106 subject to this constitution
and will not sway nor be intimidated in any manner as to pronounce a conclusion that doesnt
reflect all relevant issues regarding the inquest. A true and proper finding may itself give notice
15 to all concerned that ultimately the Rule of Law must be obeyed regardless of a persons standing
in society!
To many the conduct of IS (Islamic state) may be no different then what politicians and the
judiciary are doing just that it might be deemed different to politicians/judiciary and their
20 servants because they assume a role of power and so hold they can act to do so regardless how
unconstitutional it might be. To many Australian born youth the ongoing rorting exposed about
members of various Governments within Australia underlines that you can violate the laws as
long as you are in a position of power and so to say untouchable. After all, as I alluded before,
who is holding Premier Daniel Andrews legally accountable for grossly deceiving Victorians in
25 his election statements that the contracts of the East-West Link were not the paper it was written
upon (to that effect) but then Victorian taxpayers ending up having to fork out about 1.1 to1.2
billion dollars. This was undermining democracy itself by undermining the election and by so to
say by lies and deception gain power.
In my 4-3-2014 correspondence to the Victorian Auditor-General I then warned about the misuse
30 of public office for election matters. It was ignored! On 28-3-2014 I repeated the same. It was
ignored!
Then:
QUOTE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
35 Mr D. Napthine Premier of Victoria 4-6-2014
denis.napthine@parliament.vic.gov.au
Cc: Mr Geoff Shaw MP geoff.shaw@parliament.vic.gov.au

Mr Ken Smith, Former Speaker, Legislative Assembly Victoria, ken.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au
40 Daniel Andrews leader ALP daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
20140604-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Premier D Napthine-Re Geoff Shaw MP-etc
Sir,
45 END QUOTE
I repeated the same ongoing citing the http://ag.ca.gov/ethics/accessible/misuse.php
QUOTE
Ethics Orientation for State Officials

50 Misuse of Public Funds

Page 64
END QUOTE
And clearly Mr Daniel Andrews was included in being provided with a copy of those details! Yet
many months later he still allegedly uses public monies to fund his election campaign and then
5 when so to say having stolen the election uses his Government to try to prevent any
investigation.
The youth of today and other therefore are provided with examples how one can even go as far to
undermine the democratic processes of an election and then so to say get away with it.
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I find it totally abhorrent for anyone to act in defiance of the
10 legal principles embedded in the constitution but regretfully can UNDERSTAND that those who
are shown the examples of abuse and misuse of powers then may adapt the same.
What we need is a better legal accountability of wrongdoers in Government/Parliament and those
acting in the seat of justice and this show those who are growing up in Australia will find shining
15 examples of model citizenship and where offenders are held accountable regarding of their
position in society.
No more police officers being able to beat speeding offences that radar equipment was faulty
while other motorist still have to pay fines and are caused to have demerit points against their
20 license for the same.
As I have pointed out radar equipment used cannot be legally used unless they are certified by
the Commonwealth. That is where the legislative powers are and our constitution doesnt provide
for the Commonwealth to delegate legislative powers to the States!
25 For society to expect new comers, etc, to respect the Rule of Law we need to ensure that those
who are in Government/Parliament and in the judiciary and so their agents too show due and
proper respect for the Rule of Law.
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
30 Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
35
QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
40 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE
45
A coroner therefor must act as a sentry to uphold the Rule of Law of which the constitution
with its embedded legal principles is the primary source of law!
In case this Supplement 9 is kept from you I will publish it also on the internet as well as notify
50 the media, to ensure it is not concealed from the public.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL
55 (Our name is our motto!)


20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION To Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

Coroner Sara Hinchey J 1-5-2017

10 Ref: 20170501-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 9

The Last Veteran -- No further words are necessary

30 On 27 Apr 2017, at 4:23 PM, MAX BOLTE <maxbolte9@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Luciana [mailto:truluc@optusnet.com.au]

Subject: My Bloody Oath

Below is a letter passed onto me by another "True Blue Aussie".

Page 4 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Lest we forget it!!!

KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING!!

Page 5 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

29 Apr at 2:53 PM (20170430)

If Islam is a religion of peace then wouldn't an extremist be extremely peaceful?

Page 6 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

40 "Islam is as dangerous in a man as rabies in a dog."

A moderate Muslim is a lazy jihadist that is out of ammunition.

- Muslims want to escape from Muslim countries to Western (Christian) countries.

30 - Ritual slitting of animals' throats vs. ending of animal sacrifice.

- Religion vs. Technology & Medicine - Censorship vs. freedom of speech.

- Intolerance for criticism of Islam vs. tolerance for religious dissent.

- Conversions allowed to Islam only vs. freedom of conscience.

35 - Converts to Christianity beheaded vs. no dead converts to Islam.

That's the reality.

5 Where Are the Moderate Muslims?

Published on 27 Apr 2017

10 (Video duration: 5:47 min.)

Date: 29 April 2017 at 11:15:57 am AEST

Today at 7:37 (28-4-2017)

Page 10 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

(image not included)

Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>

Page 12 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

60 Your friend can google Cruden V Neale 1796. It says it all.

Man is NOT subject to ANY law other than natural law.

Is there in black & white.

---------- Forwarded message ----------

30 This is a reader friendly transcript of the judgement:

In Australia the NSW police are considering them a terrorist threat:

Extract from the wikipedia article:

60 Jeffrey Hodges B.Sc. M.Sc.(Hons) B.Ed.

Page 14 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

5 On 24 April 2017 at 13:14, Jeffrey Hodges <sportsmind@bigpond.com> wrote:

10 From: Mark B [mailto:underthewire4me@gmail.com]

15 Hi Jeff. Have answered below

20 From: Ben Musgrave [mailto:ben.musgrave@gmail.com]

Page 15 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Page 17 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

From: RAY PLATT [mailto:rayplatt@iinet.net.au]

PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS FAR AND WIDE.

30 ----- Original Message -----

45 Sent: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 8:39 AM

Page 18 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Page 19 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

5 Convicted IS recruiter Hamdi Alqudsi has two wives.

I hope Canberra is listening.

Today at 9:54 (28-4-2017()

Today at 16:38 (29-4-2017)

Daniel Andrews pathetic Labor government is failing Victorians with their

Most dangerous parts of Melbournes CBD revealed

A strong police presence in Melbourne CBD

Page 23 1-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.