Key players in control of the HHS grant process who use

this influence to gain favorable case results for CRC

members and govt paid fees for AFCC professionals.
Center for Policy Research
AFCC (CPR)
judges who hear the cases & the Affiliated
court professionals appearing before them
Jessica Pearson, Policy Studies Inc.
Jessica Pearson-Incorporating Officer Director Final 2,4 PSI (CPPS)
Evaluates AND Evaluations David Williams
designs key program
David Price
Cross Affiliated People:
Joan B. Kelly
Elizabeth Hickey Key Problems
Co-Founder:
1 Jim Cook $$$$$$$$ Federal HHS-OCSE FatherhoodPrograms: 1 - people
Meyer Elkin David Dinn use to pay court professionals in cases 2 - program
3 - money
Phil Stahl 2,3,4
$ $ 1) Access/Visitation Enforcement (Mandated)
4- conflicts
1, 3, 4 $ 2) Responsible Fatherhood (Discretionary)
Funded with OCSE discretionary program funds;
$ $ Model Custody Program and OCSE Incentive funds;
$ $ and from surplus state TANF funds
when D.V. is a factor 2,3,4 2,3,4
2, 3, 4 $
Children Rights Council $
(CRC) Owner Operated
1, 3, 4
Early Implementation 2 , 4 privatized child
1, 3, 4 Reviews & Exec Summaries support sites
Paid from program funds: 2, 3, 4

Pro-Pedophile Custody Experts

1, 4 Psychologist, Evaluators
Pedophiles Judicial Trainers, Mediators,
Gardner & Underwager & Farrell Supervisors

Program Design & Implementation

Principle Violations: designed to intervene in court cases
1) Judges obtaining the grants & hearing cases are in some instances 2,4
affiliated with the male litigants (programs serve as a vehicle for
favorable case results for enrolled dads - many are CRC members).
Child Access Project Colorado POP Program
2) Federal evaluators concealed:
Designed by CPR& PSI
(a) their role in program design; (b) their ownership role in model A/V Demo Project
Implemented thru Maximus -
program site; (c) cross-affiliation with program case managers; (d) Dick Woods, IA CRC
PSI Owner Operated Site
affiliated with court professionals being paid from program as court Managed IA project- Gardner tactis
Fathers Rights (CRC) made program
evaluators; (e) designed program so child support agencies recruit used in cases to switch custody
case managers and given judicial
the adversary of their Congressional mandated public client for sole fathers accused of child abuse
authority to change court orders
purpose of litigating against that custodial client; (f) gave case
DeadBeat dads given free program -
managers judicial like authority to change support orders; (g) use of
paid attys. to litigant on custody &
Gardner/PAS tactics which they have discredited themselves.
visitation against the mother