Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Madison Shelburg
English 2010
2/7/17
Collin Hull
Its no secret, the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world; furthermore, an
extremely high recidivism rate. The issue here is that as a society, the goal for imprisonment is to
punish rather than rehabilitate. Although there are programs available for inmates some may
argue the quality of the program. The following people analyzed rehabilitative programs
available to inmates and their effectiveness. Heather Schoenfeld, a sociology professor at Ohio
State University, argues that the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world and the
causes of this problem. The second author, Robbie Couch, a predominantly political writer for
the Washington Post, argues that our current rehabilitation programs are aiding in fixing the
broken prison system. The third set of authors; Anthony Brewer, Montoya Rutherford, Mike
Howard-Smith and Yedwa Ngwenya, discuss the variety of prison rehabilitation programs in the
U.S.. While there are programs set in place there are two sides who either urge the success of
selected programs or those who express how ineffective due to recidivism rates.
Schoenfeld states that prison rates in the U.S. are the highest in the world, with 724 per
100,000 citizens. (Five things everyone should know about incarceration, Schoenfeld).
Schoenfeld contends that the result of more people being incarcerated is not a product of higher
crime rates but because it targets a variety of offenders, ranging from drug, violent and
2 Shelburg
nonviolent offenders and keeps them imprisoned much longer. Although many refer to America
as the land of the free it could be more justifiably known as the land of the incarcerated. It
incarcerates more people per capita than any other nation. Its imprisonment rate is almost 50%
(percent) higher than Russia's and 320% (percent) higher than China's. (Schoenfeld). She also
implies that mass incarceration disproportionately impacts U.S. racial minorities and that
incarceration is expensive.
Robbie Couch shares that the rehabilitation programs that are in place are helping to fix
the broken prison system. Couch argues that instead of holding people who are too dangerous to
release while waiting for trial, jails have become filled with those who are too poor to afford bail
and people with mental health issues or a history of drug addiction crowding our jails and
prisons. (These programs are helping to fix a broken U.S. prison system, Couch). He also states
that the majority of offenders will break the law more than once and spend years in and out of
the system. He shares the problem and offers a current solution that is in action. One solution
would be programs that help to rehabilitate criminals to learn valuable skills and become
(PEP) program which focuses on changing inmate behavior and helping them to create an
entrepreneurship and funding. (These programs are helping to fix a broken U.S. prison system,
Couch). The Forensic Assertive Community Treatment team prioritizes mental health and
focuses on providing beneficial treatment to clients (These programs are helping to fix a broken
U.S. prison system, Couch). Ohio shows inmates that they are an asset to the community, this
helps to break down the segregational barriers many criminals face and provide inmates with a
3 Shelburg
sense of belonging. Overall, these programs help to teach prisoners viable skills to be
Anthony Brewer, Montoya Rutherford, Mike Smith and Yedwa Ngwenya, are writers for the
organization Lawjrank who talk about the current correctional rehabilitative programs that are in
place today. The different programs offered to the majority of prisoners in the U.S.. To put into
simpler terms, they all fall under the basis of different educational and variation of work related
programs with a variation of counseling programs. These types of programs are supplied to help
criminal offenders to become productive members to society and trustworthy employees. There
are different levels of education you can reach in prison including the GED, which is equivalent
College degrees are only offered to one third of the United States institutions. Many prisons
offer different life skills training programs which help prisoners to have a basic understanding of
everyday functional principles including: how to apply and interview for a job, how to budget
money, how to live a healthy life, and how to be a parent and spouse. On a broader spectrum of
treatment supplied, substance abuse programs are extremely popular and include group therapy
4 Shelburg
and counseling sessions. These programs can have some complications including funding for
institutions and space for criminals. Without having proper resources many prisoners are not
given proper treatment, therefore, are unable to be rehabilitated into a contributing member of
Heather Schoenfeld argues that we have the highest incarceration rate in the world and
that the U.S. does not have an effective prison rehabilitation system. She implies that we
prosecute more crimes than most countries do. The main issue she believes is that we imprison
people for societys problems when it really all comes down to a much deeper rooted issue.
The second author, Robbie Couch, also believes that the current prison system is broken,
however he states specific programs that are statistically proving successful rehabilitation. While
Schoenfeld takes a very negative approach on the prison reform system Couch contends a very
hopeful promising approach to the rehabilitation in the incarcerated. He contends that in certain
institutions they are focusing on very specific issues like mental illness and how to better treat
them. Brewer, Smith, Rutherford and Ngdweya simply states the educational and life skills
programs offered to the majority of prisoners in the U.S.. This group stays very neutral
throughout the article and only states their opinion at the end by saying that some of the issues
with the reform programs are due to a lack of resources. Other than that, there isnt any kind of
bias as to whether or not this system works. In comparison to Couchs article, the Lawjrank
group simply informs readers of the programs and who they are offered too. However, Lawjrank
In the first article, written by Heather Schoenfeld, I analyzed, the author very strongly
states the points as to why our prison system is broken. This article is written by a Sociology
5 Shelburg
Professor at Ohio state, giving her more credibility than the average investigator, but also may
include some bias in the subject being a white female in a predominantly white community. She
has a lot of credibility through her knowledge of statistics collected through extensive research.
She has done an extensive amount of research in prisons involving race, politics and capacity in
prisons. The article is very factual and the author cites all facts given and leaves her opinion out
of it. You can tell by some of the language used in her sentences that she does have a negatively
biased opinion, but she backs it up using facts. Example, Imprisoning criminals is expensive.
You can tell by the way that she states these facts that they have more of a negative connotation.
However, every statement she makes is true she just tends to point out the negatives following
incarceration. She also doesnt give any kind of solution to this issue. She only is exposing the
bad without stating any type of solution to the problem. The author of article two, Robbie Couch,
is very effective in using different appeals to be convincing. He seems to be credible in using the
appeal to logos. He discusses how the current prison system is broken and the different types of
programs being used and their effectiveness. He uses a lot of statistics and data to back up his
claims. One weakness is that you can tell some of the language has a negative or a positive bias.
The third article, written by the lawjrank organization, I analyzed is very factual. The only
portion of the article that is opinionated is towards the last paragraph when the author states that
the issues with some of the programs include lack of resources. Another weakness in this article
is that the author only utilizes one appeal, which is ethos. To make a strong argument, all three
In conclusion, the authors; Schoenfeld, Couch, Smith, Rutherford, Brewer and Ngwenya,
used different methods to get information across. Some similarities include: the descriptions of
6 Shelburg
programs and their effectiveness, and the current issues within the incarceration system. Through
the eyes of different analysts (authors), we can see a common theme in which there is a problem
with the way that our jailing and imprisonment system is working in this present day. All of the
authors offer up current programs that are in place today to deal with the problems, as well as
give an analytical point of view for further solutions that can better improve upon our judicial
system to help people who are incarcerated find their place in our modern society, and proceed in
Works Cited
7 Shelburg
Schoenfeld, Heather. "Five things everyone should know about US incarceration." Al Jazeera
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/03/201332671936115766.html
and Counseling - JRank Articles. Net Industries and its Licensors , n.d. Web. 21 Feb. 2017.
http://law.jrank.org/pages/1935/Rehabilitation-Correctional-programs-in-United-States.html
Couch, Robbie. "These Programs Are Helping Fix A Broken U.S. Prison System." The
2017.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/12/recidivism-programs-prison_n_6655392.html
http://www.prisoneducation.com/correspondence-programs/