Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marilena Greco
CeSOS, Centre of Excellence for Ships and Ocean Structures, Norway
Steps of Physical Investigation
Navier-Stokes
Coupling Solver
Domain-Decomposition strategies
Potential
Seakeeping
Solver
Shallow-water
approximation
2D Water-on-DECK Experiments
Water-on-Deck Scenarios
Dam-Breaking (DB) type
DB
Dam
Water-on-Deck Scenarios
Water-on-Deck Scenarios
Plunging-wave plus Dam-Breaking (PDB) type
PDB
Water-on-Deck Scenarios
Hammer-Fist (HF) type
HF
Water-on-Deck Investigations
Most common scenario
PDB type
PDB Water-on-Deck: Initial stages
Initial area of the entrapped cavity
Area/f2
max-f
f
From experiments
m = (max-f)/cf
Kjeldsen & Myrhaug (1979)
PDB Water-on-Deck: Initial stages
Experiments DD BEM-NS results
PDB Water-on-Deck: Initial stages
Experiments DD BEM-NS results
x/ [(max-f)m]
From experiments
PDB Water-on-Deck: Later stages
Flow evolution and interaction with a superstructure
Experiments
DD results
Experiments
DD results
Water-on-Deck Investigations
HF type
HF Water on-Deck: Occurrence
PDB HF
(p-p0)/(gD) (p-p0)/(gD)
Dam-Breaking events
Marintek (2000)
White-Water events
Hammer-Fist events
3D Model Tests With Fixed Model
Side View
Deck location
Incoming wave packet
Freeboard
3D Model Tests
Analysis of the Initial stage
Freeboard exceeded
3D Model Tests
Analysis of the Initial stage
Plunging Flow
2-D Tests
water
Ship Deck
3D Model Tests
Analysis of the Initial stage
2-D Tests
water
Ship Deck
3D Model Tests
Analysis of the Initial stage
Freeboard exceeded
and plunging flow
3D Model Tests With Fixed Model
Structure of the deck flow
Transverse flow
Growing of the
Inner blunt structure
Circular bow
Elliptic bow
Centreline Water-Front Velocity
u/[g(H-f)m]0.5
m=(H-f)/c
From experiments
Green-Water Loading on the Superstructure
From experiments
3D Water on deck
Experiments versus LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
Front bow motion
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
Front bow motion
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
Front bow motion
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22,Bottom
Fr 0 Side
Front bow motion
Experiments Experiments
3D DD 3D DD
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
Front bow motion
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
Front bow motion
3D Water on deck: Model Tests vs LSeak-NS DD
/ L 1.25, kA 0.22, Fr 0
Front bow motion
From 3D Experimetal Video
/L=1.25, kA=0.15, Fr=0.189
From 3D Experimetal Video
/L=1.25, kA=0.15, Fr=0.189
wall
Deck Pressure: Model Tests Exp.
vs WNLSeak-SW DD Num.
Exp.
Num.
Exp.
wall Num.
Probably due to with-spray
jet impact before the main
water reaches the wall
Experiments: Parametric Roll & Water on Deck
Front view
Side view
Parametric roll occurrence
Numerical (WNLSeak-SW DD) transient phase
/L=1 kA=0.1
T
T4n
5
6
7
Parametric roll occurrence: Numerical sol.
Influence of water-on-deck loads on the instability
This research has been possible especially
thanks to:
Dr. Maurizio Landrini Dr. Claudio Lugni Dr. Giuseppina Colicchio Prof. Odd M. Faltinsen
CNR-INSEAN CNR-INSEAN & CeSOS CNR-INSEAN & CeSOS NTNU & CeSOS