Professional Documents
Culture Documents
One of the top trends of the supply chain affecting the industry of transportation is multi-modal
transportation. In the course of recent years, capacity is found to be squeezed with the shortages
of driver, increased prices of fuel, expanded demand, and increased oversight of the government.
Such uncontrollable issues at hand influence everything from pricing to the timing of loads while
the answers are being sought by the executives for maintaining a supply chain that is cost
conventionally, carriers entirely sell the benefits of their modes and that this way to deal with
transportation is rapidly getting to be distinctly obsolete in the worldwide society. It's getting to
be clearer that shippers need to adopt a more coordinated strategy to keep pace with consumer
demands and economic expansion. One of the significant examples of the accomplishment of a
business segment coordinating their procedures for keeping pace within the economy is mobile
phones. During 1980s, these devices had just one purpose: to make essential calls. In any case, as
the economy quickly got boosted, essentially making a call no longer addressed business issues.
The industry associated with the technology integrated data, talk, connectivity for allowing the
communication anywhere and at any time within the world. The logistic executives in today's
world are adopting a similar strategy to address the squeezing of the capacity in accordance with
the integration of the distinctive transportation modes: sea, air, truck and rail etc. In accordance
with the economy experiencing one of its slowest expansionary periods ever, shippers are
investigating diverse methods for the integration before everything ramps back up. The best and
effective undertaking of an integration has been with multi-modal rail. In the recent years,
shippers have discovered across the nation as of late that multi-modal rail proactively addressing
the need to meet both present and future demands of business as the economy keeps on growing.
This essay will discuss the evaluation of an impact of intermodal or multimodal choice on the
The activities of logistics involve inventory management freight transport, storage and all of the
considerable number of required activities for moving products in accordance with the supply
chain. A supply chain can be characterized as a coordinated procedure in which a few distinct
Information and material flows traditionally characterize this chain. For long time, the product
distribution with different transportation modes is not considered in the supply chain's
management. Despite what might be expected, it is the supply chain's external service provider
who dependably oversees it, however it doesn't bolster the performance measurement for the
controlling of costs. This particular study is mainly focused on the influence of the multi-modal
freight framework. We plan to make a proposal so as to provide a solution for lessening the
effects of such a framework, by the modelling of social and environmental costs keeping in mind
the end goal for the development of solution so as to solve this model.
(ECMT) as the carriage of goods by at least two different transportation modes in the same
loading unit without stuffing or stripping operations when changing modes. Intermodal
transportation systems offer a wide choice of transportation mode and several alternative paths,
hence, the need for better coordination of flows and movements in such a system. During the last
policies in intermodal systems, management of flows between modes and the potential
ECMT as the merchandise carriage by no less than two diverse modes of transportation within a
similar unit of loading without stripping or stuffing operations in accordance with the change in
modes. The frameworks of multi-modal transportation offer a significant choice of the mode of
transportation and other alternative paths and consequently, the requirement for better
coordination of movements and flows in such a framework. Amid the most recent decade,
various publications have concentrated on various parts of multi-modal transport issues, for
pricing for multi-modal systems, potential environmental impacts of such movement and
interconnections, incorporating numerous mode combinations in which all of the components are
impeccably connected to frame an efficient flow for the coordination. This makes a provision of
a full scope of transport modes and various transportation alternatives, facilitating the deliveries,
stockpiling, the manufacturing and the diverse functions of distribution. The multi-modal
systems are found to be characterized by the multiple and dynamic transportation modes, that
operates all the while between them. In this framework, the crossing of the goods from one mode
transportation take into consideration rail, water, air and road. Ecological issues associated with
the freight turn out to be more essential these days since it is a fact that the transport segment is
considered as a noteworthy contributor for dealing with the issues related to sustainability within
The effects of transport on the environment and health are notable today; they incorporate a
dangerous global warming, the dispersion of organic and inorganic substances incorporating
toxic ground-level ozone, the deterioration of ozone layer, the degradation of soils and
landscapes, and the scarcity of oil and other natural resources. The emanations of greenhouse
gases and gaseous pollutants as NOx, CO2, NO2 results in adverse effects of health, damage to
materials and buildings, effects on agricultural production and crops, and effects on semi natural
and natural ecosystems; this is the reason as to why the directives of European Union restrict
exhaust emanations from new vehicles. There are likewise effects on the infrastructures of
transport, for example, destruction on the constructions of road. To these effects, must be
included traffic congestion, noise pollution, energy consumption and social impacts like
accidents. The energy that is devoured by transportation is assessed to be 33% of the entire
consumed energy within the European Union. Contamination from vehicles, for example,
gaseous pollutants from the heavy trucks, for instance, Nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide,
volatile organic compounds, and particulate pollutants. A few hydrocarbons that incorporates the
emissions of volatile organic compounds from the emissions of engine are found to be
carcinogenic. Nitrogen oxides are imperceptible poisonous gas that can result in the forming of
fine salts or aerosol particles which can contribute to smog or acid rain. The fuel engines are
regularly emitted as particulate contamination. These particles are frequently found to be the
carcinogenic chemicals that are toxic, bringing on colossal harm to the lungs. Also, particulate
and ozone matter are the cause of respiratory infection, visibility problems like fog emulated by
the environmental damage. Additionally, around 20% of Europeans experience the ill effects of
exponential increase in the trend if there is found to be no action for mitigating the impacts.
Researchers had also found three scenarios that illustrated such trend for the road freight. For the
second scenario, known as optimistic scenario, the emission of carbon dioxide from road freight
would be below the current level of 47% (10.3 million tons of CO2 in 2020), for instance by the
shift in freight away to alternative modes from road transport and by the decrease in the normal
length of haul by 15 km in respect to the present value. At last, in accordance with a pessimistic
situation, the increase in the carbon footprint of the road freight sector in 2020 to 30.0 million
tons of CO2 i.e. 56% over the present level if no action is found to be actualized to constrain the
phenomenon. The introduction of the concept of green supply chain is a route for accomplishing
this objective.
While bringing the concerns related to environment into a transportation framework changes the
supply chain configuration and this results in a change in infrastructure of logistics. Along these
lines, we should discover techniques for enhancing the performance of environment without any
need of compromising the transportation time and cost. Within the recent year, various
researches are found to be published for influence abatement within the transportation
framework. A large portion of such researches are somewhat committed to the analysis of effects
from transportation frameworks and to literature review on techniques to lessen impacts, and
The adjustments in late decades inside the structure of the systems of productionsuch as
brought about a significant rise in the needs of transportation and, thusly, in a huge increment in
the environmental influence it produces. In accordance with the increase in emanations from
transportation since 1990 now make this industry in charge of more than 25% of GHG-related
contamination, an assumption that appears to be set to further grow. In the EU-25, the
transportation on a domestic basis represents 21% of the emissions of GHG, which have
expanded by 23% since 1990. In this regard, the as of late published white paper of European
Union on the transport implies unmistakably that the transportation framework currently is not
found to be sustainable and that there should be a development of different means. In particular,
it brings up that "while more profound cuts can be accomplished in different economic sectors, a
diminishment of no less than 60% of GHGs by 2050 with respect to 1990 is required from the
transport sector, which is a huge and as yet developing source of GHGs. By 2030, the objective
for transport will be to lessen GHG emanations to around 20% underneath their 2008 level.
Given the substantial increment in transport emanations in the course of recent decades, this
would even now put them 8% over the 1990 level. Meeting such targets may be conceivable
through extraordinary endeavors on two unique fronts: to begin with, by enhancing proficiency
in every mode, in order to lessen the utilization of assets and the generation of the emanations,
and second, by animating the joined utilization of modes, i.e., multi-modal frameworks, so that
the door to door chain of transport is upgraded to make it more sustainable and efficient.
Ecological advantages are advanced as a basic contention in shielding the need to utilize multi-
modal frameworks as opposed to simply road transport. Additionally, little research has included
transportation and logistics. In accordance with the recent research, be that as it may, focuses to a
development in the demand of growth sought after from shippers for supportable transport
services. Multi-modal freight transport has developed altogether lately and is bound to assume a
critical role later. By joining the upsides of every mode, multi-modal empowers the framework to
be more productive, sustainable and cost effective. This gets to be the case notwithstanding the
fact that the decision of both the transport modes and operating carrier are choices that notably
affect ecological outcomes. Multi-modal solutions have been highlighted as one of the options of
sustainable transportation that can be offered to the clients by the logistic service providers.
Generally, the literature extensively reports lesser emission levels from sea and rail
transportation than from road transport. Aside from the rationalization of transport logistics
chain, multi-modal transportation likewise lessens the consumption of energy, empowers a more
levelheaded utilization of infrastructures, and lessens the environmental impact while getting the
benefit of the substantial capacity of rail and sea transport, while additionally profiting by the
more prominent adaptability offered by the road transport. In spite of the unequal development of
the distinctive transport modes, which has prompted to the present situation where road transport
prevails in the goods transportation, the European Commission recognizes that, for distances that
are short, no other alternative mode for transport is adequately adapted to the necessities of the
economy as road transport. It explicitly highlights, in any case, that in accordance with the
distances that are found to be longer, alternatives for the decarbonization of road are more
constrained, and multi-modality of freight has to distinctly become attractive economically for
the shippers. There is a need to have an effective co-modality. It can't be overlooked, be that as it
may, that regardless of its ultimate environmental benefits, multi-modal freight transport is found
to be quite complicated than the mode of road transport being uni-modal, as various actors are in
charge of controlling and organizing distinctive parts of the chain of transport. The inclusion of
different parties need coordination, and that the operators ought to overcome the uncertainty or
doubt they may have, and comprehend the significance of integration throughout the transport
chain. Therefore, the cooperation should be empowered among the diverse actors so that the
users can determine the solutions on a logistical basis that address their issues and are
competitive economically, and in addition get to be more sustainable. The collaboration ought to
While trying to stimulate the multi-modal transportation, Motorways of the Sea are presently
viewed as the dimension of maritime within the European corridors. The idea of MoS was
introduced by the European Commission in the 2001 Transport Policy White Paper as a policy
instrument for re-balancing the utilization of the modes of transport and concentrate on the
development of transport. The European Commission shows that the Motorways of the Sea
constitute an extraordinary mode within the Short Sea Shipping and can be characterized as new
sea based or existing sea transport services that are coordinated in the logistical chains door-to-
door and focus the freight flows on regular, frequent, viable, reliable and high quality Short Sea
Shipping links. In accordance with the deployment of MoS network, it ought to absorb a
noteworthy part of the anticipated increase in the traffic of road freight, enhance the availability
of island and peripheral states and region and decrease the congestion of road. MoS are in this
manner found to be a great transport based services in light of Short Sea Shipping offering a
genuine competitive other option to land transport and the European Commission firmly bolsters
their further integration and development into the TEN-T i.e. Trans-European Network. MoS can
thusly be considered as a more constrained idea than SSS, ready to create extra value. Their
improvement/development will rely on upon their ability to offer effective way to door to door
transport that, when all is said in done terms, will indicate competitive level that can coordinate
Greater use of this mode of transport should lead to a reduction in the problems traditionally
associated with road transport, that is, lower energy consumption and, parallel to this, lower
pollutant emissions, in addition to reduced road congestion and increased levels of safety. Hence,
according to Valente de Oliveira, the European Unions 2020 target to reduce both GHG
emissions and energy consumption by 20% reinforces the role of MoS in European transport
policy. Since sea transport is theoretically more sustainable than transport by road, SSS and MoS
offer feasible solutions for reducing the environmental problems associated with freight
transport. Specifically, the ECs 2001 Transport Policy White Paper stated that MoS should offer
efficient, regular, reliable, and frequent services that can compete in terms of transit time and
price; and should have ports connected to the motorways and with effective hinterland
connections, rapid administrative procedures and a high level of service. In the TEN-T
guidelines, four main corridors for developing MoS projects are considered: (1) Motorways of
the Baltic Sea, connecting the Baltic countries to central and western European countries; (2)
Motorway of the sea of western Europe, from Portugal and Spain via the Atlantic arc to the
North Sea and the Irish Sea; (3) Motorways of the sea of southeast Europe (eastern
Mediterranean), connecting the Adriatic to the Ionian Sea and the eastern Mediterranean,
including Cyprus; Motorways of the sea of southwest Europe (western Mediterranean),
connecting Spain, France, Italy, Malta and linking southeast Europe to the Black Sea.
Conclusion
Intermodal transportation also provides shippers with more access to equipment and standardized
transit schedules. This translates into reliability, capacity, and safety advantages. As companies
move their freight to intermodal, they will also be able to streamline their reverse logistics.
In addition, as the U.S. government continues regulating companies for environmental impact,
shippers are looking to reduce their carbon footprint. Trucks emit approximately 19.8 pounds of
carbon dioxide per 100 ton-miles. Compare this to trains, which emit 5.4 pounds of carbon
dioxide per 100 ton-miles. Until manufacturers develop a cost-effective fleet with a significantly
reduced carbon footprint, intermodal rail will continue to be the most environmentally friendly
mode of inland transport. By taking an intermodal approach, executives have solid proof that that
they are being proactive in complying with current and future government regulations
When rethinking their logistic strategies to deal with tightening truck capacity, company
executives need to seriously look at how intermodal transportation can benefit their business. It
provides significant cost savings, increased reliability, greater capacity, and offers substantial