You are on page 1of 5

Secondary ion mass spectrometry

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is a tech- ion beams (e.g., Ar700 + ).[10] The sensitive high resolution
nique used to analyze the composition of solid surfaces ion microprobe (SHRIMP) is a large-diameter, double-
and thin lms by sputtering the surface of the specimen focusing SIMS sector instrument based on the Liebl and
with a focused primary ion beam and collecting and ana- Herzog design, and produced by Australian Scientic In-
lyzing ejected secondary ions. The mass/charge ratios of struments in Canberra, Australia.
these secondary ions are measured with a mass spectrom-
eter to determine the elemental, isotopic, or molecular
composition of the surface to a depth of 1 to 2 nm. Due 2 Instrumentation
to the large variation in ionization probabilities among
dierent materials, SIMS is generally considered to be
a qualitative technique, although quantitation is possible
with the use of standards. SIMS is the most sensitive sur-
face analysis technique, with elemental detection limits
ranging from parts per million to parts per billion.

1 History
In 1910 British physicist J. J. Thomson observed a release
of positive ions and neutral atoms from a solid surface in-
duced by ion bombardment.[1] Improved vacuum pump
technology in the 1940s enabled the rst prototype ex-
periments on SIMS by Herzog and Viehbck[2] in 1949,
at the University of Vienna, Austria. In the mid-1950s
Honig constructed a SIMS instrument at RCA Labo-
ratories in Princeton, New Jersey.[3] Then in the early
1960s two SIMS instruments were developed indepen-
dently. One was an American project, led by Liebel and
Herzog, which was sponsored by NASA at GCA Corp, Schematic of a typical dynamic SIMS instrument. High energy
Massachusetts, for analyzing moon rocks,[4] the other at (usually several keV) ions are supplied by an ion gun (1 or 2) and
focused on to the target sample (3), which ionizes and sputters
the University of Paris-Sud in Orsay by R. Castaing for
some atoms o the surface (4). These secondary ions are then
the PhD thesis of G. Slodzian.[5] These rst instruments collected by ion lenses (5) and ltered according to atomic mass
were based on a magnetic double focusing sector eld (6), then projected onto an electron multiplier (7, top), Faraday
mass spectrometer and used argon for the primary beam cup (7, bottom), or CCD screen (8).
ions. In the 1970s, K. Wittmaack and C. Magee devel-
oped SIMS instruments equipped with quadrupole mass A secondary ion mass spectrometer consists of (1) a pri-
analyzers.[6][7] Around the same time, A. Benninghoven mary ion gun generating the primary ion beam, (2) a
introduced the method of static SIMS, where the pri- primary ion column, accelerating and focusing the beam
mary ion current density is so small that only a negligible onto the sample (and in some devices an opportunity to
fraction (typically 1%) of the rst surface layer is nec- separate the primary ion species by Wien lter or to pulse
essary for surface analysis.[8] The Castaing and Slodzian the beam), (3) high vacuum sample chamber holding the
design was developed in the 1960s by the French com- sample and the secondary ion extraction lens, (4) a mass
pany CAMECA S.A.S and used in materials science and analyser separating the ions according to their mass to
surface science. Instruments of this type use pulsed pri- charge ratio, and (5) a detector.
mary ion sources and time-of-ight mass spectrometers
and were developed by Benninghoven, Niehuis and Stef-
fens at the University of Mnster, Germany and also by 2.1 Vacuum
Charles Evans & Associates. Recent developments are
focusing on novel primary ion species like C60 + , ion- SIMS requires a high vacuum with pressures below 104
ized clusters of gold and bismuth,[9] or large gas cluster Pa (roughly 106 mbar or torr). This is needed to ensure

1
2 4 STATIC AND DYNAMIC MODES

that secondary ions do not collide with background gases rates the ions in a eld-free drift path according to their
on their way to the detector (i.e. the mean free path of gas velocity. Since all ions possess the same kinetic energy
molecules within the detector must be large compared to the velocity and therefore time of ight varies according
the size of the instrument), and it also prevents surface to mass. It requires pulsed secondary ion generation us-
contamination by adsorption of background gas particles ing either a pulsed primary ion gun or a pulsed secondary
during measurement. ion extraction. It is the only analyzer type able to detect
all generated secondary ions simultaneously, and is the
standard analyzer for static SIMS instruments.
2.2 Primary ion source

Three types of ion guns are employed. In one,


ions of gaseous elements are usually generated with 2.4 Detector
duoplasmatrons or by electron ionization, for instance
noble gases (40 Ar+ , Xe+ ), oxygen (16 O , 16 O2 + , 16 O2 ), A Faraday cup measures the ion current hitting a metal
or even ionized molecules such as SF5 + (generated from cup, and is sometimes used for high current secondary
SF6 ) or C60 + (fullerene). This type of ion gun is easy to ion signals. With an electron multiplier an impact of
operate and generates roughly focused but high current a single ion starts o an electron cascade, resulting in
ion beams. A second source type, the surface ionization a pulse of 108 electrons which is recorded directly. A
source, generates 133 Cs+ primary ions.[11] Cesium atoms microchannel plate detector is similar to an electron mul-
vaporize through a porous tungsten plug and are ionized tiplier, with lower amplication factor but with the ad-
during evaporation. Depending on the gun design, ne fo- vantage of laterally-resolved detection. Usually it is com-
cus or high current can be obtained. A third source type, bined with a uorescent screen, and signals are recorded
the liquid metal ion gun (LMIG), operates with metals either with a CCD-camera or with a uorescence detec-
or metallic alloys, which are liquid at room temperature tor.
or slightly above. The liquid metal covers a tungsten tip
and emits ions under inuence of an intense electric eld.
While a gallium source is able to operate with elemen-
tal gallium, recently developed sources for gold, indium 3 Detection limits and sample
and bismuth use alloys which lower their melting points.
The LMIG provides a tightly focused ion beam (<50 nm) degradation
with moderate intensity and is additionally able to gen-
erate short pulsed ion beams. It is therefore commonly Detection limits for most trace elements are between 1012
used in static SIMS devices. and 1016 atoms per cubic centimetre,[12] depending on
The choice of the ion species and ion gun respectively the type of instrumentation used, the primary ion beam
depends on the required current (pulsed or continuous), used and the analytical area, and other factors. Samples
the required beam dimensions of the primary ion beam as small as individual pollen grains and microfossils can
and on the sample which is to be analyzed. Oxygen pri- yield results by this technique.[13]
mary ions are often used to investigate electropositive el- The amount of surface cratering created by the process
ements due to an increase of the generation probability depends on the current (pulsed or continuous) and dimen-
of positive secondary ions, while caesium primary ions sions of the primary ion beam. While only charged sec-
often are used when electronegative elements are being ondary ions emitted from the material surface through the
investigated. For short pulsed ion beams in static SIMS, sputtering process are used to analyze the chemical com-
LMIGs are most often deployed for analysis; they can be position of the material, these represent a small fraction
combined with either an oxygen gun or a caesium gun of the particles emitted from the sample.
during elemental depth proling, or with a C60 + or gas
cluster ion source during molecular depth proling.

2.3 Mass analyzer 4 Static and dynamic modes

Depending on the SIMS type, there are three basic an- In the eld of surface analysis, it is usual to distinguish
alyzers available: sector, quadrupole, and time-of-ight. static SIMS and dynamic SIMS. Static SIMS is the process
A sector eld mass spectrometer uses a combination of involved in surface atomic monolayer analysis, or surface
an electrostatic analyzer and a magnetic analyzer to sep- molecular analysis, usually with a pulsed ion beam and
arate the secondary ions by their mass to charge ratio. A a time of ight mass spectrometer, while dynamic SIMS
quadrupole mass analyzer separates the masses by reso- is the process involved in bulk analysis, closely related to
nant electric elds, which allow only the selected masses the sputtering process, using a DC primary ion beam and
to pass through. The time of ight mass analyzer sepa- a magnetic sector or quadrupole mass spectrometer.
3

5 Applications [10] S. Ninomiya; K. Ichiki; H. Yamada; Y. Nakata; T. Seki; T.


Aoki; J. Matsuo (2009). Precise and fast secondary ion
mass spectrometry depth proling of polymer materials
The COSIMA instrument onboard Rosetta will be
with large Ar cluster ion beams. Rapid Commun. Mass
the rst instrument to determine the composition of Spectrom. 23: 16011606. doi:10.1002/rcm.4046.
cometary dust in situ with secondary ion mass spectrom-
etry in 2014.[14] [11] Cesium Ion Gun System for CAMECA SIMS Units.
http://www.peabody-scientific.com/. Retrieved 8
SIMS is used for quality assurance purposes in the semi- November 2013. External link in |publisher= (help)
conductor industry[15] and for the characterization of nat-
ural samples from this planet and others.[16] More re- [12] SIMS Detection Limits of Selected Elements in Si and
SiO2 Under Normal Depth Proling Conditions (PDF).
cently, this technique is being applied to nuclear foren-
Evans Analytical Group. May 4, 2007. Retrieved 2007-
sics.
11-22.
[13] Kaufman, A.J.; Xiao, S. (2003). High CO2 levels in
the Proterozoic atmosphere estimated from analyses of
6 See also individual microfossils. Nature. 425 (6955): 279282.
doi:10.1038/nature01902. PMID 13679912.
Nanosims [14] C. Engrand; J. Kissel; F. R. Krueger; P. Martin; J. Siln;
L. Thirkell; R. Thomas; K. Varmuza (2006). Chemo-
metric evaluation of time-of-ight secondary ion mass
7 References spectrometry data of minerals in the frame of future in
situ analyses of cometarys material by COSIMA onboard
ROSETTA. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrome-
[1] Thomson, J. J (1910). Rays of positive electricity. Phil. try. 20 (8): 13611368. doi:10.1002/rcm.2448. PMID
Mag. 20: 752767. doi:10.1080/14786441008636962. 16555371.

[2] Herzog, R. F. K., Viehboeck, F (1949). Ion [15] Testing & Characterization. Lucideon. Retrieved
source for mass spectrography. Phys. Rev. 76 2/28/2017. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
(6): 855856. Bibcode:1949PhRv...76..855H.
[16] NERC Ion Mirco-Probe Facility. The University of Ed-
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.76.855.
inburgh: School of Geosciences. Retrieved 2/28/2017.
Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
[3] Honig, R. E. (1958). Sputtering of surfaces by positive
ion beams of low energy. J. Appl. Phys. 29: 549555.
Bibcode:1958JAP....29..549H. doi:10.1063/1.1723219.
8 Bibliography
[4] Liebl, H. J (1967). Ion microprobe mass ana-
lyzer. J. Appl. Phys. 38 (13): 52775280. Benninghoven, A., Rdenauer, F. G., Werner, H.
Bibcode:1967JAP....38.5277L. doi:10.1063/1.1709314.
W., Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: Basic
[5] Castaing, R. & Slodzian, G. J (1962). Optique Concepts, Instrumental Aspects, Applications, and
corpusculairepremiers essais de microanalyse par emis- Trends, Wiley, New York, 1987 (1227 pages)
sion ionique secondaire. Microscopie. 1: 395399. ISBN 0-471-51945-6

[6] Wittmaack, K. (1975). Pre-equilibrium variation of


Vickerman, J. C., Brown, A., Reed, N. M., Sec-
secondary ion yield. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion ondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Ap-
Phys. 17: 3950. Bibcode:1975IJMSI..17...39W. plications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989 (341
doi:10.1016/0020-7381(75)80005-2. pages) ISBN 0-19-855625-X

[7] Magee, C. W.; Honig, Richard E. (1978). Secondary


Wilson, R. G., Stevie, F. A., Magee, C. W., Sec-
ion quadrupole mass spectrometer for depth proling de- ondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Hand-
sign and performance evaluation. Rev. Scient. In- book for Depth Proling and Bulk Impurity Anal-
strum. 49 (4): 477485. Bibcode:1978RScI...49..477M. ysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989 ISBN
doi:10.1063/1.1135438. PMID 18699129. 0-471-51945-6

[8] Benninghoven, A (1969). Analysis of sub-monolayers Vickerman, J. C., Briggs, D., ToF-SIMS: Sur-
on silver by secondary ion emission. Physica Status So- face Analysis by Mass Spectrometry, IM Publica-
lidi. 34 (2): K169171. Bibcode:1969PSSBR..34..169B. tions, Chichester UK and SurfaceSpectra, Manch-
doi:10.1002/pssb.19690340267. ester UK, 2001 (789 pages) ISBN 1-901019-03-9

[9] S.Hofmann (2004). Sputter-depth proling for thin- Bubert, H., Jenett, H., Surface and Thin Film Anal-
lm analysis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. ysis; A compendium of Principles, Instrumentation,
362 (1814): 5575. Bibcode:2004RSPTA.362...55H. and Applications, p. 86-121, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1304. PMID 15306276. heim, Germany 2002 ISBN 3-527-30458-4
4 9 EXTERNAL LINKS

9 External links
Tutorial pages for SIMS theory and instrumentation
5

10 Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses


10.1 Text
Secondary ion mass spectrometry Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_ion_mass_spectrometry?oldid=767950529 Contrib-
utors: Edward, Stone, Schutz, Cyrius, Art Carlson, Peter Ellis, Rich Farmbrough, Ilana, Kwamikagami, Cmdrjameson, Velella, Twisp, Gene
Nygaard, Graham87, Nanite, Rjwilmsi, Pyt, Jaraalbe, Gaius Cornelius, Tomburbine, Fredericks, Kkmurray, Eatcacti, SmackBot, Agateller,
Stevesims, Polyhedron, Smith609, ChrisCork, CmdrObot, Nick Y., Mbell, Simskoarl, WVhybrid, Philippe, JAnDbot, Analytica;, Dirac66,
Leyo, EdC2, Signalhead, Johnny1926, GirasoleDE, Phe-bot, Linoleum13, Jesnow, PipepBot, Djr32, Dgoia, Addbot, DOI bot, MrOl-
lie, Download, Danielcland, Washburnmav, YouAreNotReadingThis, AnomieBOT, Chuckiesdad, Materialscientist, Eaglabs, Capricorn42,
Jatosado, FrescoBot, Gire 3pich2005, Citation bot 1, Trappist the monk, Tobias1984, RjwilmsiBot, EmausBot, John of Reading, Dewritech,
Dcirovic, Bibcode Bot, Laiyxs, Materialsandeng, SurfAnalyst, DrMNairn, Monkbot and Anonymous: 34

10.2 Images
File:SIMS_instrument_scheme_600x600.png Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/SIMS_instrument_
scheme_600x600.png License: Public domain Contributors: No machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on
copyright claims). Original artist: No machine-readable author provided. Twisp assumed (based on copyright claims).

10.3 Content license


Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

You might also like