CAND 16 CV 05975 WHA Document 27 3

Case 3:16-cv-05975-WHA Document 27-3 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 798
Case Number: 3:16-cv-6109-WHA
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Antioch, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Antioch, CA
Correct District: Yes
Date Filed: October 23, 2016
Status: Voluntarily Dismissed on April 6, 2017
Reason for Dismissal: Plaintiffs investigators determined the ISP address traced to a
business and could not ascertain the immediate responsible party for the
infringement.
1
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06109-WHADocument
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed 05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page 31 of
of 798
3
1
2
3
4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, No. C 16-06109 WHA
11
United States District Court
Plaintiff,
12
For the Northern District of California
v. ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

13 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR
14 Address 104.187.188.35, TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE
15 Defendant.
/
16
17 Plaintiff, Malibu Media, LLC, alleges that it owns registered copyrights in various
18 pornographic films and that John Doe defendant directly infringed those copyrights by
19 distributing the films on the Internet using the above-captioned IP address. Malibu Media now
20 seeks leave to serve a subpoena on third-party AT&T Internet Services, in order to ascertain the
21 identity of the subscriber using that IP address prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.
22 Malibu Medias motion is hereby GRANTED. This is without prejudice to any motions
23 to quash or modify the subpoena that may be filed by any interested party, including AT&T or
24 the subscriber assigned to the IP address. Furthermore, the following limitations apply:
25 The subpoena shall only request the actual name and address of the
subscriber to whom AT&T assigned the above-captioned IP address.
26 The subpoena shall only seek the name and address of the subscriber for
27 the time frame from FOURTEEN DAYS BEFORE the date of the first alleged
infringing act to FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER the date of the last alleged
28 infringing act.
Malibu Media shall attach a copy of this order to the subpoena.
3
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed 05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page 42 of
of 798
3
1 Malibu Media may not use any information disclosed by AT&T for any
purpose other than protecting its rights as set forth in the complaint.
2
AT&T shall, in turn, serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this
3 order on the subscriber within TWENTY-FOUR DAYS of the date of service
on AT&T.
4
The return date on the subpoena shall be no less than FORTY-FIVE DAYS
5 from the date of service on AT&T. AT&T shall not disclose any
identifying information about defendant to Malibu Media prior to the
6 return date or, if a motion to quash or modify the subpoena is filed, prior
to the resolution of any motions to quash or modify the subpoena.
7 Malibu Media must inform AT&T if any such motion is filed.
8 Malibu Media shall not disclose defendants name, address, telephone
number, email, social media username, or any other identifying
9 information, other than defendants IP address, that it may subsequently
learn. All documents including defendants identifying information,
10 apart from his or her IP address, shall be filed under seal, with all such
information redacted on the public docket, unless and until the Court
11 orders otherwise and only after defendant has had an opportunity to
challenge the disclosure of any identifying information. Malibu Media

12 explicitly consented to the inclusion of such a protection in its motion.
13 Unless otherwise provided, both sides may file under seal any of
defendants identifying information pursuant to this order, without
14 seeking further leave to file under seal. A version with all identifying
information redacted shall be filed on the public docket.
15
Malibu Media must seek leave to serve subpoenas on any other Internet
16 service provider besides AT&T in this matter.
17 Malibu Media shall have THIRTY-FIVE DAYS from the date on which it
receives defendants identifying information from AT&T (or, if later,
18 until the deadline set by Rule 4(m)). Any requests to extend that deadline
shall be made immediately as circumstances justifying the extension
19 arise, rather than at the last minute. Malibu Media must support
any assertion that defendant is dodging service with an affidavit
20 of non-service (to be filed under seal, with defendants identifying
information redacted on the public docket). Malibu Media shall please
21 file a notice informing the Court of the date on which it received
defendants identifying information no later than FIVE CALENDAR DAYS
22 after receiving that information.
23 If Malibu Media learns, whether through subpoena response or other
communication, that defendants IP address was assigned to a physical
24 address outside this district, it shall, within 21 CALENDAR DAYS from the
date on which it learned that information, dismiss the action or SHOW
25 CAUSE why it should not be dismissed.
26
27
28
2
4
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed 05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page 53 of
of 798
3
1 Any motions relating to the subpoena or the protective order discussed above shall be
2 filed prior to the return date of the subpoena.
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated: February 1, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
5
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Northern District of California
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC Civil Action No: 3:16-cv-06109-WHA

Plaintiff
v.
John Doe subscriber assigned to IP address

104.187.188.35,
Defendant.
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO

PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: AT&T Internet Services

Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
North Palm Beach, FL. 33408
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
E-mail: compcent@att.com
[X] Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth
below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their
inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
Please produce documents identifying the name AND address ONLY of the defendant
John Doe listed in the below chart:
IP Address Date/Time
UTC
104.187.188.35 06/25/2016
22:18:24
Place: Henrik Mosesi, Esq. Date and Time:

433 N. Camden Drive., 6th Floor March 24, 2017 @ 9:30 a.m.
Beverly Hills, 90210
Telephone: (310) 734-4269
[ ] Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated
premises, land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set
forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or
sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
Place: Date and Time:
6
The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached Rule 45(c), relating to the
place of compliance; Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a
subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and
the potential consequences of not doing so.
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT
____________________________ OR /s/ Henrik Mosesi,

Esq.
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Henrik Mosesi, Esq.
The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing Plaintiff, who
issues or requests this subpoena, are: Henrik Mosesi, Esq., 433 N. Camden Drive., 6th Floor,
Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (310) 734-4269- E-mail: henry@mosesi.com
Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena

If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored
information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a
copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the
person to whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
7
(page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13)
(c) Place of Compliance. inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all

of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A producing electronically stored information in the
subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, form or forms requested. The objection must be
hearing, or deposition only as follows: served before the earlier of the time specified for
(A) within 100 miles of where the person compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
in person; or (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
(B) within the state where the person resides, is person, the serving party may move the court for
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, the district where compliance is required for an
if the person order compelling production or inspection.
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or (ii) These acts may be required only as
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would directed in the order, and the order must protect a
incur substantial expense. person who is neither a party nor a partys officer
from significant expense resulting from
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may compliance.
command:
(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(A) production of documents, electronically
stored information, or tangible things at a place (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is the district where compliance is required must
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; quash or modify a subpoena that:
and
(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
inspected. (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the
geographical limits specified in Rule 45 ( c );
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other
Enforcement. protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies;
or
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for
issuing and serving a subpoena must take (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the
expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The district where compliance is required may, on
court for the district where compliance is required motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
sanctionwhich may include lost earnings and research, development, or commercial information;
reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney or
who fails to comply. (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
information that does not describe specific
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit occurrences in dispute and results from the experts
Inspection. study that was not requested by a party.
(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B),
commanded to produce documents, electronically the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
stored information, or tangible things, or to permit subpoena, order appearance or production under
the inspection of premises, need not appear in specified conditions if the serving party:
person at the place of production or inspection (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony
unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, or material that cannot be otherwise met without
hearing, or trial. undue hardship; and
(B) Objections. A person commanded to (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
produce documents or tangible things or to permit reasonably compensated.
inspection may serve on the party or attorney
designated in the subpoena a written objection to
8
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena. destroy the specified information and any copies it
has; must not use or disclose the information until
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
Information. These procedures apply to producing retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
documents or electronically stored information: before being notified; and may promptly present
the information under seal to the court for the
(A) Documents. A person responding to a district where compliance is required for a
subpoena to produce documents must produce them determination of the claim. The person who
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business produced the information must preserve the
or must organize and label them to correspond to information until the claim is resolved.
the categories in the demand.
(g) Contempt.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not The court for the district where compliance is
specify a form for producing electronically stored requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
information, the person responding must produce it the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily who, having been served, fails without adequate
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
it.
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced
in Only One Form. The person responding need not
produce the same electronically stored information
in more than one form.
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored

Information. The person responding need not
provide discovery of electronically stored
information from sources that the person identifies
as not reasonably accessible because of undue
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or
for a protective order, the person responding must
show that the information is not reasonably
accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that
showing is made, the court may nonetheless order
discovery from such sources if the requesting party
shows good cause, considering the limitations of
Rule
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for
the discovery.
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.
(A) Information Withheld. A person

withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-
preparation material must:
(i) expressly make the claim; and
(ii) describe the nature of the withheld
documents, communications, or tangible things in a
manner that, without revealing information itself
privileged or protected, will enable the parties to
assess the claim.
(B) Information Produced. If information
produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
preparation material, the person making the claim
may notify any party that received the information
of the claim and the basis for it. After being
notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
9
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Jose, CA
ISP Response Trace City: N/A
Correct District: N/A
Status: Active case Plaintiff served the subpoena on February 6, 2017. The ISP is
expected to comply by May 19, 2017. To date, Plaintiff has not received the
response from AT&T.
25
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
13 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page27
1 of
of 3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
27
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
13 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page28
2 of
of 3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
28
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
13 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page29
3 of
of 3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
29


Plaintiff
v.

107.128.208.141,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
107.128.208.141 05/19/2016
09:17:17

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
30
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

31
(page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to

producing electronically stored information in the
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A form or forms requested. The objection must be
subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, served before the earlier of the time specified for
hearing, or deposition only as follows: compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
(A) within 100 miles of where the person If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
in person; or person, the serving party may move the court for
(B) within the state where the person resides, is the district where compliance is required for an
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, order compelling production or inspection.
if the person (ii) These acts may be required only as
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or directed in the order, and the order must protect a
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would person who is neither a party nor a partys officer
incur substantial expense. from significant expense resulting from
compliance.
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may
command: (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(A) production of documents, electronically (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for
stored information, or tangible things at a place the district where compliance is required must
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is quash or modify a subpoena that:
employed, or regularly transacts business in person;
and (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the
inspected. geographical limits specified in Rule 45 ( c );
(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies;
Enforcement. or
(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense;
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject
issuing and serving a subpoena must take to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or district where compliance is required may, on
expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
court for the district where compliance is required (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate research, development, or commercial information;
sanctionwhich may include lost earnings and or
reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
who fails to comply. information that does not describe specific
occurrences in dispute and results from the experts
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit study that was not requested by a party.
Inspection. (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In
the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B),
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
commanded to produce documents, electronically subpoena, order appearance or production under
stored information, or tangible things, or to permit specified conditions if the serving party:
the inspection of premises, need not appear in (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony
person at the place of production or inspection or material that cannot be otherwise met without
unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, undue hardship; and
hearing, or trial. (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
(B) Objections. A person commanded to reasonably compensated.
produce documents or tangible things or to permit
designated in the subpoena a written objection to (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all
32
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
Information. These procedures apply to producing before being notified; and may promptly present
documents or electronically stored information: the information under seal to the court for the
district where compliance is required for a
(A) Documents. A person responding to a determination of the claim. The person who
subpoena to produce documents must produce them produced the information must preserve the
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business information until the claim is resolved.
or must organize and label them to correspond to
the categories in the demand. (g) Contempt.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored The court for the district where compliance is
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
specify a form for producing electronically stored the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
information, the person responding must produce it who, having been served, fails without adequate
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. it.


Rule
the discovery.

assess the claim.
destroy the specified information and any copies it
the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
33
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
ISP Response Trace City: San Jose, CA
Status: Active case Plaintiff is in the process of reaching a settlement agreement

with Defendant.
44
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page46
1 of
of 3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
46
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page47
2 of
of 3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
47
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page48
3 of
of 3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
48


Plaintiff
v.

107.128.208.88,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
107.128.208.88 07/04/2016
09:26:34

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
49
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

50
(page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. producing electronically stored information in the
form or forms requested. The objection must be
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A served before the earlier of the time specified for
subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
hearing, or deposition only as follows: If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
(A) within 100 miles of where the person (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business person, the serving party may move the court for
in person; or the district where compliance is required for an
(B) within the state where the person resides, is order compelling production or inspection.
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, (ii) These acts may be required only as
if the person directed in the order, and the order must protect a
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or person who is neither a party nor a partys officer
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would from significant expense resulting from
incur substantial expense. compliance.
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
command:
(A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for
(A) production of documents, electronically the district where compliance is required must
stored information, or tangible things at a place quash or modify a subpoena that:
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
and (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the
(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be geographical limits specified in Rule 45 ( c );
inspected. (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other
protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies;
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; or
Enforcement. (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the
issuing and serving a subpoena must take district where compliance is required may, on
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
court for the district where compliance is required research, development, or commercial information;
must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate or
sanctionwhich may include lost earnings and (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney information that does not describe specific
who fails to comply. occurrences in dispute and results from the experts
study that was not requested by a party.
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In
Inspection. the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B),
the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person subpoena, order appearance or production under
commanded to produce documents, electronically specified conditions if the serving party:
stored information, or tangible things, or to permit (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony
the inspection of premises, need not appear in or material that cannot be otherwise met without
person at the place of production or inspection undue hardship; and
unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
hearing, or trial. reasonably compensated.
(B) Objections. A person commanded to
inspection may serve on the party or attorney (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
51
Information. These procedures apply to producing

documents or electronically stored information: (A) Information Withheld. A person
(A) Documents. A person responding to a that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-
subpoena to produce documents must produce them preparation material must:
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business (i) expressly make the claim; and
or must organize and label them to correspond to (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
the categories in the demand. documents, communications, or tangible things in a
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored privileged or protected, will enable the parties to
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not assess the claim.
specify a form for producing electronically stored (B) Information Produced. If information
information, the person responding must produce it produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. preparation material, the person making the claim
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced of the claim and the basis for it. After being
in Only One Form. The person responding need not notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
produce the same electronically stored information destroy the specified information and any copies it
in more than one form. has; must not use or disclose the information until
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
Information. The person responding need not before being notified; and may promptly present
provide discovery of electronically stored the information under seal to the court for the
information from sources that the person identifies district where compliance is required for a
as not reasonably accessible because of undue determination of the claim. The person who
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or produced the information must preserve the
for a protective order, the person responding must information until the claim is resolved.
accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that (g) Contempt.
discovery from such sources if the requesting party The court for the district where compliance is
shows good cause, considering the limitations of requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
Rule the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for who, having been served, fails without adequate
the discovery. excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
it.
52
55
56
57
58
59
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Carlos, CA
Status: Voluntarily dismissed prior to receiving Defendants identity because

Plaintiff reached a settlement with opposing counsel.
62
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page64
1 of
of 3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
64
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page65
2 of
of 3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
65
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page66
3 of
of 3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
66


Plaintiff
v.

107.199.204.150,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
107.199.204.150 06/09/2016
06:15:34

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
67
Date:2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

68
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena
is served. If an objection is made, the following rules
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena apply:
may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
deposition only as follows: person, the serving party may move the court for the
(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is district where compliance is required for an order
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or compelling production or inspection.
(B) within the state where the person resides, is (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, if the order, and the order must protect a person who is
the person neither a party nor a partys officer from significant
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or expense resulting from compliance.
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would incur
substantial expense. (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may command: (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the
district where compliance is required must quash or
(A) production of documents, electronically stored modify a subpoena that:
information, or tangible things at a place within 100
miles of where the person resides, is employed, or (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
regularly transacts business in person; and (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the
protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
Enforcement.
(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. affected by a subpoena, the court for the district where
A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a compliance is required may, on motion, quash or modify
subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing the subpoena if it requires:
undue burden or expense on a person subject to the (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is research, development, or commercial information; or
required must enforce this duty and impose an (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
appropriate sanctionwhich may include lost earnings information that does not describe specific occurrences
and reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney in dispute and results from the experts study that was
who fails to comply. not requested by a party.
(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court
Inspection. may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena,
order appearance or production under specified
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person conditions if the serving party:
commanded to produce documents, electronically stored (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or
information, or tangible things, or to permit the material that cannot be otherwise met without undue
inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the hardship; and
place of production or inspection unless also (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial. reasonably compensated.
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce
documents or tangible things or to permit inspection
may serve on the party or attorney designated in the (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying,
testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
inspecting the premisesor to producing electronically Information. These procedures apply to producing
stored information in the form or forms requested. The documents or electronically stored information:
objection must be served before the earlier of the time
69
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena (g) Contempt.

to produce documents must produce them as they are
kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize The court for the district where compliance is
and label them to correspond to the categories in the requiredand also, after a motion is transferred, the
demand. issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person who,
having been served, fails without adequate excuse to
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not
specify a form for producing electronically stored
information, the person responding must produce it in a
form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in
a reasonably usable form or forms.
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in

Only One Form. The person responding need not
produce the same electronically stored information in
more than one form.
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information.

The person responding need not provide discovery of
electronically stored information from sources that the
person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of
undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or
for a protective order, the person responding must show
that the information is not reasonably accessible because
of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the
court may nonetheless order discovery from such
sources if the requesting party shows good cause,
considering the limitations of Rule
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the
discovery.
(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding

subpoenaed information under a claim that it is
privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation
material must:
(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents,
communications, or tangible things in a manner that,
without revealing information itself privileged or
protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
(B) Information Produced. If information produced
in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of
privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material,
the person making the claim may notify any party that
received the information of the claim and the basis for
it. After being notified, a party must promptly return,
sequester, or destroy the specified information and any
copies it has; must not use or disclose the information
until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before
being notified; and may promptly present the
information under seal to the court for the district where
compliance is required for a determination of the claim.
The person who produced the information must preserve
the information until the claim is resolved.
70
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Campbell, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Cupertino, CA
Date Dismissed: April 27, 2017
Reason for Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff received Defendant's identity on or around

March 27, 2017 and immediately began its investigation of the subscriber.
Prior to amending its complaint and serving the John Doe defendant, Plaintiff takes
great lengths to research the Doe defendant and ensure it is pursuing the correct
infringer.
In this case, the subscriber was female and contained a common first and last name.
Moreover, she resided with her husband, and two adult children, one male age
twenty-three and one female, age twenty-one.
Plaintiff examined its additional information containing a list of other content

downloaded through BitTorrent in order to help aid in determining the likely
responsible party. In doing so, it built an extensive profile on each member of the
household. The additional evidence contained 9,647 downloads over the course of
years containing a variety of works, ranging from PBS documentaries to 60 minutes
episodes, video games, popular music, and software.
Ultimately, Plaintiffs investigation delayed the case and by the time Plaintiff filed its
amended complaint and received its summons, the Rule 4m deadline was only two
days away.
Knowing that the delays in this case were not justified, Plaintiff voluntarily
dismissed rather than moving for extension. Plaintiff realizes now that filing fifty-
seven cases in one month stretches its resources and does not allow it to
expeditiously process its cases. Plaintiff and undersigned sincerely apologize and
assure your Honor that in the future, if Plaintiff ever files more cases in this District,
it will do so in much smaller numbers with diligent case management.
72
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page74
1 of
of 3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
74
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page75
2 of
of 3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
75
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page76
3 of
of 3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
76


Plaintiff
v.

107.204.175.161,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
107.204.175.161 07/04/2016
04:00:59

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample
the property or any designated object or operation on it.
77
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT
____________________________ OR /s/ Henrik Mosesi, Esq.

The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing Plaintiff, who issues
or requests this subpoena, are: Henrik Mosesi, Esq., 433 N. Camden Drive., 6th Floor, Beverly
Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (310) 734-4269- E-mail: henry@mosesi.com

78
(page 3)

(c) Place of Compliance. designated in the subpoena a written objection to
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to
subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, producing electronically stored information in the
hearing, or deposition only as follows: form or forms requested. The objection must be
(A) within 100 miles of where the person served before the earlier of the time specified for
resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
in person; or If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
(B) within the state where the person resides, is (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, person, the serving party may move the court for
if the person the district where compliance is required for an
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or order compelling production or inspection.
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would (ii) These acts may be required only as
incur substantial expense. directed in the order, and the order must protect a
person who is neither a party nor a partys officer
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may from significant expense resulting from
command: compliance.
(A) production of documents, electronically (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.

stored information, or tangible things at a place
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; the district where compliance is required must
and quash or modify a subpoena that:
(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be
inspected. (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(ii) requires a person to comply beyond the
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; geographical limits specified in Rule 45 ( c );
Enforcement. (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; or
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
issuing and serving a subpoena must take
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject
expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the
court for the district where compliance is required district where compliance is required may, on
must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
sanctionwhich may include lost earnings and (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney research, development, or commercial information;
who fails to comply. or
(ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit information that does not describe specific
Inspection. occurrences in dispute and results from the experts
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In
commanded to produce documents, electronically the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B),
stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
the inspection of premises, need not appear in subpoena, order appearance or production under
person at the place of production or inspection specified conditions if the serving party:
unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony
hearing, or trial. or material that cannot be otherwise met without
(B) Objections. A person commanded to undue hardship; and
produce documents or tangible things or to permit (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
79
reasonably compensated. the discovery.

(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
Information. These procedures apply to producing that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-
documents or electronically stored information: preparation material must:
(A) Documents. A person responding to a (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
subpoena to produce documents must produce them documents, communications, or tangible things in a
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business manner that, without revealing information itself
or must organize and label them to correspond to privileged or protected, will enable the parties to
the categories in the demand. assess the claim.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
specify a form for producing electronically stored preparation material, the person making the claim
information, the person responding must produce it may notify any party that received the information
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily of the claim and the basis for it. After being
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced has; must not use or disclose the information until
in Only One Form. The person responding need not the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
produce the same electronically stored information retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
in more than one form. before being notified; and may promptly present
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored district where compliance is required for a
Information. The person responding need not determination of the claim. The person who
provide discovery of electronically stored produced the information must preserve the
information from sources that the person identifies information until the claim is resolved.
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or (g) Contempt.
show that the information is not reasonably The court for the district where compliance is
accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
showing is made, the court may nonetheless order the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
discovery from such sources if the requesting party who, having been served, fails without adequate
shows good cause, considering the limitations of excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
Rule it.
80
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
91
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Los Altos, CA
Status: Plaintiff served its subpoena on AT&T on February 6, 2017. Plaintiff is currently
waiting for the ISP to respond to its subpoena and expects it do so by June 7, 2016.
93
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page95
1 of
of 3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
95
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page96
2 of
of 3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
96
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
27-3
12 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page97
3 of
of 3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
97


Plaintiff
v.

107.214.150.33,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
[X] Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below
the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection,
copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
Please produce documents identifying the name AND address ONLY of the defendant John
Doe listed in the below chart:
UTC
107.214.150.33 06/07/2016
18:54:21

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
98
subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the
potential consequences of not doing so.
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT


If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information,
or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of the
subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person to
whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
99
(page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. electronically stored information in the form or forms

requested. The objection must be served before the
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days
may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made,
deposition only as follows: the following rules apply:
(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; person, the serving party may move the court for the
or district where compliance is required for an order
(B) within the state where the person resides, is compelling production or inspection.
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, if (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in
the person the order, and the order must protect a person who is
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or neither a party nor a partys officer from significant
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would incur expense resulting from compliance.
substantial expense.
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may command:
(A) production of documents, electronically stored the district where compliance is required must quash
information, or tangible things at a place within 100 or modify a subpoena that:
miles of where the person resides, is employed, or
regularly transacts business in person; and (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing affected by a subpoena, the court for the district where
and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to compliance is required may, on motion, quash or
avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person modify the subpoena if it requires:
subject to the subpoena. The court for the district (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
where compliance is required must enforce this duty research, development, or commercial information; or
and impose an appropriate sanctionwhich may (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
include lost earnings and reasonable attorneys fees information that does not describe specific
on a party or attorney who fails to comply. occurrences in dispute and results from the experts
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the
Inspection. circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court
may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena,
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person order appearance or production under specified
commanded to produce documents, electronically conditions if the serving party:
stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or
inspection of premises, need not appear in person at material that cannot be otherwise met without undue
the place of production or inspection unless also hardship; and
commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
trial. reasonably compensated.
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce
may serve on the party or attorney designated in the (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
inspecting the premisesor to producing Information. These procedures apply to producing
100
documents or electronically stored information: (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.
(A) Documents. A person responding to a (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding

subpoena to produce documents must produce them as subpoenaed information under a claim that it is
they are kept in the ordinary course of business or privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation
must organize and label them to correspond to the material must:
categories in the demand. (i) expressly make the claim; and
(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents,
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored communications, or tangible things in a manner that,
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not without revealing information itself privileged or
specify a form for producing electronically stored protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
information, the person responding must produce it in (B) Information Produced. If information
a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
in a reasonably usable form or forms. claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation
material, the person making the claim may notify any
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in party that received the information of the claim and
Only One Form. The person responding need not the basis for it. After being notified, a party must
produce the same electronically stored information in promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified
more than one form. information and any copies it has; must not use or
disclose the information until the claim is resolved;
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information
Information. The person responding need not provide if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may
discovery of electronically stored information from promptly present the information under seal to the
sources that the person identifies as not reasonably court for the district where compliance is required for
accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion a determination of the claim. The person who
to compel discovery or for a protective order, the produced the information must preserve the
person responding must show that the information is information until the claim is resolved.
not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or
cost. If that showing is made, the court may (g) Contempt.
nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the
requesting party shows good cause, considering the The court for the district where compliance is
limitations of Rule requiredand also, after a motion is transferred, the
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person who,
discovery. having been served, fails without adequate excuse to
obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
101
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Emeryville, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Piedmont, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff dismissed this case on May 2, 2017 after lengthy
negotiations with opposing counsel resulted in the parties reaching a settlement
agreement.
103
P I L L A R L AW G R O U P
A P R O F E S S I O N A L L A W C O R P O R A T I O N
150 SOUTH RODEO DRIVE TELEPHONE: (310) 999-0000

SUITE 260 FACSIMILE: (888) 667-5482
BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90212 WWW.PILLAR.LAW
Friday, December 9, 2016
VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL
AT&T Internet Services

Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
Re: Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber assigned IP Address

107.216.114.7; Case No. 3:16-cv-5850-WHA
Dear Custodian of Records,
Pillar Law Group, APLC represents Plaintiff in the above captioned matter. On
10/11/2016, Plaintiff filed the instant case against John Doe Subscriber assigned IP
address 107.216.114.7 claiming Defendants direct infringement of Plaintiffs works
through the BitTorrent protocol. See CM/ECF 1. Because Defendant is only known to
Plaintiff by Defendants IP address, Plaintiff intends on filing a Renewed Motion for
Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena on the Defendants Internet Service Provider
(Renewed Motion), in order to obtain Defendants true identity. Plaintiff is in the
process of preparing this motion for filing. Please be advised that Plaintiffs Renewed
Motion, will seek leave of court to obtain Defendants identifying information from
AT&T Internet Services. Specifically, Plaintiff will seek documents in AT&Ts
possession which identify the name and address of the Defendant John Doe who was
assigned IP Address 107.216.114.7 at the following date and time: 6/5/2016 5:14:22 PM
UTC. Accordingly, Plaintiff hereby requests that you preserve the foregoing documents.
Please prevent the destruction, expiration, deletion, overwriting, concealment, or
modification (even if such data would otherwise expire, be deleted or overwritten,
concealed, or modified in the normal course of business, including through the
termination of user accounts) of documents which identify the name and address of the
Defendant John Doe who was assigned IP Address 107.216.114.7 at the following date
and time: 6/5/2016 5:14:22 PM UTC.
Compliance with these preservation obligations includes forwarding a copy of this letter
to all individuals that are responsible for the documents referred to in this letter. If this
correspondence is in any respect unclear, please call me immediately.
1
104
To be clear, this is not a subpoena and Plaintiff is not demanding your production of
Defendants identifying information at this time. Please do NOT produce any of John
Doe Defendants identifying information to undersigned or Plaintiff until after the Court
grants Plaintiffs Renewed Motion and Plaintiff serves you with a subpoena.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter in further detail, please feel free
to call my office.
Sincerely,
/s/ Henrik Mosesi

Henrik Mosesi
2
105
109
110
111
112
113
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Santa Clara, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff dismissed this case on March 17, 2017 because
Comcast, Defendants ISP, could not identify the subscriber.
116
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05927-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page117
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

14 address 107.3.138.207, TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE
15 Defendant.
/
16
20 seeks leave to serve a subpoena on third-party Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, in order
21 to ascertain the identity of the subscriber using that IP address prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.
23 to quash or modify the subpoena that may be filed by any interested party, including Comcast or
subscriber to whom Comcast assigned the above-captioned IP address.
28 infringing act.
117
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05927-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page118
2 ofof3798
1 Malibu Media may not use any information disclosed by Comcast for any
2
Comcast shall, in turn, serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this
on Comcast.
4
5 from the date of service on Comcast. Comcast shall not disclose any
7 Malibu Media must inform Comcast if any such motion is filed.

15
16 service provider besides Comcast in this matter.
receives defendants identifying information from Comcast (or, if later,
26
27
28
2
118
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05927-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page119
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
119


Plaintiff
v.

107.3.138.207,
Defendant.

To: Comcast Corporation

c/o CT Corporation System
818 West Seventh Street, Ste 930
Los Angeles, CA. 90017
UTC
107.3.138.207 06/16/2016
03:40:53

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

120
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

121
(page 3)
compliance.
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

122
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

it.
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

123
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Monterey, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Monterey, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff dismissed this case on April 6, 2017 because Defendants
ISP's subpoena response revealed that the John Doe Defendant was also a Defendant in
another Malibu case (3:16-cv-6240-WHA). Accordingly, Plaintiff determined that it
would proceed against this Defendant in the other case.
127
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05738-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page129
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
129
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05738-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page130
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
130
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05738-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page131
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
131


Plaintiff
v.

108.194.46.141,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.194.46.141 04/19/2016
21:35:40

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
132
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

133
(page 3)
compliance.
Enforcement. or
134

it.
135
140
141
142
143
144
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Sunnyvale, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Sunnyvale, CA
Status: Plaintiff received the Defendants identifying information on April 24, 2017.
Plaintiff immediately conducted an investigation and determined that the evidence
strongly indicated that the subscriber was the infringer. Specifically, Plaintiffs
additional evidence contained information that the Defendant was downloading consumer
report magazines, Harvard business review, data analytic management system software,
and e-books focused on marketing and growing a business. The subscriber is CEO of
what appears to be a start up tech company.
On April 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint under seal. See CM/ECF 18.
And, on May 8, 2017, Plaintiff received its summons. See CM/ECF 21. Plaintiffs rule
4(m) deadline to serve the defendant is May 28, 2017. This Order to Show Cause
followed.
147
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page149
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
149
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page150
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
150
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page151
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
151


Plaintiff
v.

108.228.12.17,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.228.12.17 06/23/2016
01:42:05

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
152
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

153
(page 3)
compliance.
Enforcement. or
154

it.
155
160
161
162
163
164
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Salinas, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Salinas, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff received Defendants name on March 28, 2017 and on
April 17, 2017 Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal. After an investigation, Plaintiff
determined that it was not in Plaintiffs, nor Defendants, best interests to move forward
with litigation. Indeed, its investigation revealed that Defendant was likely struggling
financially and still lived with his parents.
167
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05921-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page169
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
169
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05921-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page170
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
170
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05921-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page171
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
171


Plaintiff
v.

108.239.176.87,
Defendant.
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT

INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION

Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.239.176.87 06/08/2016
03:47:47

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
172
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing Plaintiff, who issues or
requests this subpoena, are: Henrik Mosesi, Esq., 433 N. Camden Drive., 6th Floor, Beverly Hills, CA
90210 Telephone: (310) 734-4269- E-mail: henry@mosesi.com

If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or
tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena
must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person to whom it is directed.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
173
(c) Place of Compliance. inspection may serve on the party or attorney

(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all
subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to
hearing, or deposition only as follows: producing electronically stored information in the
(A) within 100 miles of where the person form or forms requested. The objection must be
resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business served before the earlier of the time specified for
in person; or compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
(B) within the state where the person resides, is If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
if the person person, the serving party may move the court for
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or the district where compliance is required for an
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would order compelling production or inspection.
incur substantial expense. (ii) These acts may be required only as
directed in the order, and the order must protect a
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may person who is neither a party nor a partys officer
command: from significant expense resulting from
compliance.
stored information, or tangible things at a place (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for
and the district where compliance is required must
(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be quash or modify a subpoena that:
inspected.
(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the
Enforcement. geographical limits specified in Rule 45 ( c );
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies;
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for or
issuing and serving a subpoena must take (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or
expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject
court for the district where compliance is required to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the
must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate district where compliance is required may, on
sanctionwhich may include lost earnings and motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
who fails to comply. research, development, or commercial information;
or
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
Inspection. information that does not describe specific
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person study that was not requested by a party.
commanded to produce documents, electronically (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In
stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B),
the inspection of premises, need not appear in the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
person at the place of production or inspection subpoena, order appearance or production under
unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, specified conditions if the serving party:
hearing, or trial. (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony
(B) Objections. A person commanded to or material that cannot be otherwise met without
produce documents or tangible things or to permit undue hardship; and
174
(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be the discovery.

reasonably compensated.
Rule it.
175
180
181
182
183
184
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Burlingame, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff dismissed this case on February 27, 2017 after it was
notified that AT&T could not identify the defendant.
187
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06155-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page189
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
189
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06155-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page190
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
190
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06155-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page191
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
191


Plaintiff
v.

108.242.182.35,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.242.182.35 07/04/2016
02:25:25

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
192
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

193
(page 3)

command:
produce documents or tangible things or to permit (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
designated in the subpoena a written objection to (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all Information. These procedures apply to producing
of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to documents or electronically stored information:
194

(A) Documents. A person responding to a withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
subpoena to produce documents must produce them that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business preparation material must:
or must organize and label them to correspond to (i) expressly make the claim; and
the categories in the demand. (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored manner that, without revealing information itself
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not privileged or protected, will enable the parties to
specify a form for producing electronically stored assess the claim.
information, the person responding must produce it (B) Information Produced. If information
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced may notify any party that received the information
in Only One Form. The person responding need not of the claim and the basis for it. After being
produce the same electronically stored information notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
in more than one form. destroy the specified information and any copies it
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
Information. The person responding need not retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
provide discovery of electronically stored before being notified; and may promptly present
information from sources that the person identifies the information under seal to the court for the
as not reasonably accessible because of undue district where compliance is required for a
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or determination of the claim. The person who
for a protective order, the person responding must produced the information must preserve the
show that the information is not reasonably information until the claim is resolved.
showing is made, the court may nonetheless order (g) Contempt.
shows good cause, considering the limitations of The court for the district where compliance is
Rule requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
the discovery. who, having been served, fails without adequate
excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. it.
195
200
201
202
203
204
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Clearlake, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Kelseyville, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on April 17, 2017
because after an investigation it determined that the defendant was an elderly woman.
Although it appeared as if one of her sons may have been the infringer, Plaintiff
determined not to proceed with its case because Plaintiff has stated in the past it does not
pursue cases against the elderly.
206
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05739-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page208
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
208
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05739-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page209
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
209
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05739-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page210
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
210


Plaintiff
v.

108.243.38.8,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.243.38.8 04/21/2016
11:31:25

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
211
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

212
(page 3)
command:
and
or
213

(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
Information. These procedures apply to producing (A) Information Withheld. A person
documents or electronically stored information: withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
(A) Documents. A person responding to a preparation material must:
subpoena to produce documents must produce them (i) expressly make the claim; and
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
or must organize and label them to correspond to documents, communications, or tangible things in a
the categories in the demand. manner that, without revealing information itself
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored assess the claim.
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not (B) Information Produced. If information
specify a form for producing electronically stored produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
information, the person responding must produce it claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily preparation material, the person making the claim
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. may notify any party that received the information
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
in Only One Form. The person responding need not destroy the specified information and any copies it
produce the same electronically stored information has; must not use or disclose the information until
in more than one form. the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored before being notified; and may promptly present
Information. The person responding need not the information under seal to the court for the
provide discovery of electronically stored district where compliance is required for a
information from sources that the person identifies determination of the claim. The person who
as not reasonably accessible because of undue produced the information must preserve the
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or information until the claim is resolved.
show that the information is not reasonably (g) Contempt.
showing is made, the court may nonetheless order The court for the district where compliance is
discovery from such sources if the requesting party requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
shows good cause, considering the limitations of the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
Rule who, having been served, fails without adequate
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
the discovery. it.
214
219
220
221
222
223
Status: Plaintiff has not yet received the identity of the Defendant from Defendants
Internet Service Provider. Plaintiff expects to receive it June 2, 2017 per its
communications with AT&T.
226
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06249-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page228
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
228
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06249-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page229
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
229
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06249-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page230
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
230


Plaintiff
v.

108.66.4.102,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
IP Address Date/Time UTC

108.66.4.102 07/07/2016
13:21:45

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
231
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

232
(page 3)

command:
produce documents or tangible things or to permit (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
designated in the subpoena a written objection to (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all Information. These procedures apply to producing
of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to documents or electronically stored information:
233

(A) Documents. A person responding to a withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
subpoena to produce documents must produce them that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business preparation material must:
or must organize and label them to correspond to (i) expressly make the claim; and
the categories in the demand. (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored manner that, without revealing information itself
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not privileged or protected, will enable the parties to
specify a form for producing electronically stored assess the claim.
information, the person responding must produce it (B) Information Produced. If information
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced may notify any party that received the information
in Only One Form. The person responding need not of the claim and the basis for it. After being
produce the same electronically stored information notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
in more than one form. destroy the specified information and any copies it
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
Information. The person responding need not retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
provide discovery of electronically stored before being notified; and may promptly present
information from sources that the person identifies the information under seal to the court for the
as not reasonably accessible because of undue district where compliance is required for a
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or determination of the claim. The person who
for a protective order, the person responding must produced the information must preserve the
show that the information is not reasonably information until the claim is resolved.
showing is made, the court may nonetheless order (g) Contempt.
shows good cause, considering the limitations of The court for the district where compliance is
Rule requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
the discovery. who, having been served, fails without adequate
excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. it.
234
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Mateo, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On April 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal with

prejudice because Plaintiff reached a settlement Defendants counsel. And, although
Plaintiff never received a response from Defendants ISP, Defendants counsel did verify
the name of the Defendant and address, which was located in San Mateo, CA.
236
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05847-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page238
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
238
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05847-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page239
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
239
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05847-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page240
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
240
AO 88B (Rev.02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action


Plaintiff
v.

108.69.129.69,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.69.129.69 06/02/2016
14:49:34

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
241
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

242
(page 3)
compliance.
inspected.
or
243
(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for

Rule it.
244
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Newark, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Fremont, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On April 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal with
prejudice because Plaintiff reached a settlement Defendants counsel.
246
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05843-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page248
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
248
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05843-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page249
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
249
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05843-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page250
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
250


Plaintiff
v.

108.77.237.167,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.77.237.167 06/01/2016
12:46:53

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
251
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

252
(page 3)

inspection may serve on the party or attorney reasonably compensated.
253
the discovery.
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena. (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored (A) Information Withheld. A person

Information. These procedures apply to producing withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
documents or electronically stored information: that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-
(A) Documents. A person responding to a (i) expressly make the claim; and
subpoena to produce documents must produce them (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business documents, communications, or tangible things in a
or must organize and label them to correspond to manner that, without revealing information itself
the categories in the demand. privileged or protected, will enable the parties to
assess the claim.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored (B) Information Produced. If information
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a
specify a form for producing electronically stored claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
information, the person responding must produce it preparation material, the person making the claim
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily may notify any party that received the information
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. of the claim and the basis for it. After being
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced destroy the specified information and any copies it
in Only One Form. The person responding need not has; must not use or disclose the information until
produce the same electronically stored information the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
in more than one form. retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
before being notified; and may promptly present
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored the information under seal to the court for the
Information. The person responding need not district where compliance is required for a
provide discovery of electronically stored determination of the claim. The person who
information from sources that the person identifies produced the information must preserve the
as not reasonably accessible because of undue information until the claim is resolved.
for a protective order, the person responding must (g) Contempt.
accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that The court for the district where compliance is
showing is made, the court may nonetheless order requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
discovery from such sources if the requesting party the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
shows good cause, considering the limitations of who, having been served, fails without adequate
Rule excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for it.
254
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Albany, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Albany, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff received Defendant's identity on or around March 24,

2017 and immediately began its investigation on Defendant.
After it completed its investigation, Plaintiff determined that the evidence most likely
identified the subscriber as the infringer based on the length of infringement, geographic
location and apparent lack of access by any third party to Defendants Internet during the
time of infringement.
Unfortunately, however, Plaintiffs investigation took two weeks and Plaintiff did not file
it's Amended Complaint until April 5, 2017. Plaintiff did not receive the Summons until
April 26, 2017. Plaintiffs extension to serve the Defendant was denied without
prejudice. Because Plaintiffs counsel did not request the summons in person, Plaintiff
felt that a renewed extension would not be considered good faith, and dismissed its case.
Plaintiff apologizes to the Court for its undue delay and in the future, should it file
additional cases in this District, it will ensure it has counsel appear personally to pick up
the summons and avoid any unnecessary extension requests.
282
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06108-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page284
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
284
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06108-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page285
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
285
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06108-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page286
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
286


Plaintiff
v.

108.78.248.226,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.78.248.226 06/25/2016
20:22:19

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
287
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT


288
(page 3)

289
reasonably compensated. may notify any party that received the information
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena. destroy the specified information and any copies it
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
Information. These procedures apply to producing retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
documents or electronically stored information: before being notified; and may promptly present
(A) Documents. A person responding to a district where compliance is required for a
subpoena to produce documents must produce them determination of the claim. The person who
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business produced the information must preserve the
or must organize and label them to correspond to information until the claim is resolved.
the categories in the demand.
(g) Contempt.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not The court for the district where compliance is
specify a form for producing electronically stored requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
information, the person responding must produce it the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily who, having been served, fails without adequate
maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
it.

Rule
the discovery.

assess the claim.
290
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Francisco, CA
ISP Response Trace City: San Francisco, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed its dismissal on April 7, 2017. On April 4, 2017
Plaintiff received Defendants identifying information. Plaintiff immediately conducted
an investigation and determined that the subscriber lives with his wife and adult child.
Plaintiffs investigators largely believed that the adult child was the actual infringer,
butalso that he suffered financial difficulties. Based on the suspected infringers hardship,
Plaintiff determined it was not in either parties best interest to proceed.
306
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05926-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page308
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
308
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05926-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page309
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
309
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05926-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page310
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
310


Plaintiff
v.

108.85.29.158,
Defendant.
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT

INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION

Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
[X] Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the
following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying,
testing, or sampling of the material:
Please produce documents identifying the name AND address ONLY of the defendant John Doe
listed in the below chart:
UTC
108.85.29.158 06/15/2016
01:46:58

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
311
Date:2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT


Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
312
(c) Place of Compliance. objection must be served before the earlier of the time
specified for
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena
may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If
deposition only as follows: an objection is made, the following rules apply:
(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or person, the serving party may move the court for the
(B) within the state where the person resides, is district where compliance is required for an order
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, if compelling production or inspection.
the person (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or the order, and the order must protect a person who is
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would incur neither a party nor a partys officer from significant
substantial expense. expense resulting from compliance.
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may command: (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(A) production of documents, electronically stored (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the
information, or tangible things at a place within 100 district where compliance is required must quash or
miles of where the person resides, is employed, or modify a subpoena that:
regularly transacts business in person; and
Enforcement. protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions.
A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or
subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing affected by a subpoena, the court for the district where
undue burden or expense on a person subject to the compliance is required may, on motion, quash or modify
subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is the subpoena if it requires:
required must enforce this duty and impose an (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
appropriate sanctionwhich may include lost earnings research, development, or commercial information; or
and reasonable attorneys feeson a party or attorney (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
who fails to comply. information that does not describe specific occurrences
in dispute and results from the experts study that was
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit not requested by a party.
Inspection. (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the
circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena,
commanded to produce documents, electronically stored order appearance or production under specified
information, or tangible things, or to permit the conditions if the serving party:
inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or
place of production or inspection unless also material that cannot be otherwise met without undue
commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial. hardship; and
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
documents or tangible things or to permit inspection reasonably compensated.
may serve on the party or attorney designated in the
testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
inspecting the premisesor to producing electronically
stored information in the form or forms requested. The (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored
313
Information. These procedures apply to producing (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

documents or electronically stored information:
(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena subpoenaed information under a claim that it is
to produce documents must produce them as they are privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation
kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize material must:
and label them to correspond to the categories in the (i) expressly make the claim; and
demand. (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents,
communications, or tangible things in a manner that,
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored without revealing information itself privileged or
Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
specify a form for producing electronically stored (B) Information Produced. If information produced
information, the person responding must produce it in a in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of
form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material,
a reasonably usable form or forms. the person making the claim may notify any party that
received the information of the claim and the basis for
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in it. After being notified, a party must promptly return,
Only One Form. The person responding need not sequester, or destroy the specified information and any
produce the same electronically stored information in copies it has; must not use or disclose the information
more than one form. until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. being notified; and may promptly present the
The person responding need not provide discovery of information under seal to the court for the district where
electronically stored information from sources that the compliance is required for a determination of the claim.
person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of The person who produced the information must preserve
undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or the information until the claim is resolved.
for a protective order, the person responding must show
that the information is not reasonably accessible because (g) Contempt.
of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the
court may nonetheless order discovery from such The court for the district where compliance is
sources if the requesting party shows good cause, requiredand also, after a motion is transferred, the
considering the limitations of Rule issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person who,
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the having been served, fails without adequate excuse to
discovery. obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
314
319
320
321
322
323
Voluntary Dismissal: On April 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed its Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
because it reached settlement with Defendants counsel. Plaintiff never learned the
identity of the Defendant in this case.
326
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05970-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page328
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
328
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05970-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page329
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
329
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05970-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page330
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
330


Plaintiff
v.

108.89.36.115,
Defendant.
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR

TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION

Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
108.89.36.115 06/19/2016
15:59:31

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
331
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT


Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
332

compliance.
inspected.
or
333
(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for

Rule it.
334
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Fremont, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Newark, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed its dismissal on May 5, 2017 because Defendants
ISP was unable to provide Plaintiff with Defendants name. All AT&T could provide to
Plaintiff was an address and the name Sonic Customer. Based on this information,
Plaintiff was unable to complete its investigation and therefore did not feel appropriate
moving forward with its case.
340
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05828-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page342
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
342
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05828-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page343
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
343
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05828-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page344
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
344


Plaintiff
v.

162.226.173.100,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
Please produce documents identifying the name AND address ONLY of the defendant John
Doe listed in the below chart:
UTC
162.226.173.100 05/30/2016
08:56:13

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
345
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing Plaintiff, who issues or
requests this subpoena, are: Henrik Mosesi, Esq., 433 N. Camden Drive., 6th Floor, Beverly Hills, CA
90210 Telephone: (310) 734-4269- E-mail: henry@mosesi.com

Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
346
(page 3)
command:
and
or
347

Information. These procedures apply to producing (A) Information Withheld. A person
documents or electronically stored information: withholding subpoenaed information under a claim
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
or must organize and label them to correspond to documents, communications, or tangible things in a
the categories in the demand. manner that, without revealing information itself
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
in Only One Form. The person responding need not destroy the specified information and any copies it
produce the same electronically stored information has; must not use or disclose the information until
in more than one form. the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to
retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored before being notified; and may promptly present
Information. The person responding need not the information under seal to the court for the
provide discovery of electronically stored district where compliance is required for a
information from sources that the person identifies determination of the claim. The person who
as not reasonably accessible because of undue produced the information must preserve the
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or information until the claim is resolved.
discovery from such sources if the requesting party requiredand also, after a motion is transferred,
shows good cause, considering the limitations of the issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person
Rule who, having been served, fails without adequate
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to
the discovery. it.
348
353
354
355
356
357
362
363
364
365
366
SERVICE ADDRESS:
NEWARK, CA 94560
BILLING ADDRESS:
SANTA ROSA, CA 95407
368
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Antioch, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Antioch, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a dismissal on April 4, 2017. After receiving

Defendants identity, Plaintiffs investigation determined that the infringer was most
likely Defendants husband. However, Defendant contacted Plaintiff and she explained
her situation and that she survived only on social security. After Plaintiffs conversation
with Defendant, Plaintiff did not desire to proceed with its case and accordingly,
dismissed.
369
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06146-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page371
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
371
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06146-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page372
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
372
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06146-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page373
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
373


Plaintiff
v.

162.228.218.223,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
162.228.218.223 07/01/2016
15:30:50

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
374
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

375
(page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to
inspecting the premisesor to producing
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena electronically stored information in the form or
may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or forms requested. The objection must be served
deposition only as follows: before the earlier of the time specified for
(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
is employed, or regularly transacts business in If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
person; or (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded
(B) within the state where the person resides, is person, the serving party may move the court for the
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, district where compliance is required for an order
if the person compelling production or inspection.
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or (ii) These acts may be required only as directed
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would in the order, and the order must protect a person who
incur substantial expense. is neither a party nor a partys officer from
significant expense resulting from compliance.
stored information, or tangible things at a place the district where compliance is required must quash
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is or modify a subpoena that:
Enforcement. or
Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to
issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable or affected by a subpoena, the court for the district
steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on where compliance is required may, on motion, quash
a person subject to the subpoena. The court for the or modify the subpoena if it requires:
district where compliance is required must enforce (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
this duty and impose an appropriate sanction research, development, or commercial information;
which may include lost earnings and reasonable or
attorneys feeson a party or attorney who fails to (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
comply. information that does not describe specific
circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
the inspection of premises, need not appear in person (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or
at the place of production or inspection unless also material that cannot be otherwise met without undue
commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or hardship; and
trial. (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce reasonably compensated.
subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
376

documents or electronically stored information: (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding
(A) Documents. A person responding to a privileged or subject to protection as trial-
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or (i) expressly make the claim; and
must organize and label them to correspond to the (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
categories in the demand. documents, communications, or tangible things in a
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified,
in Only One Form. The person responding need not a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy
produce the same electronically stored information the specified information and any copies it has; must
in more than one form. not use or disclose the information until the claim is
resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored information if the party disclosed it before being
Information. The person responding need not notified; and may promptly present the information
provide discovery of electronically stored under seal to the court for the district where
information from sources that the person identifies compliance is required for a determination of the
as not reasonably accessible because of undue claim. The person who produced the information
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or must preserve the information until the claim is
for a protective order, the person responding must resolved.
shows good cause, considering the limitations of requiredand also, after a motion is transferred, the
Rule issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person who,
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for having been served, fails without adequate excuse to
the discovery. obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
377
382
383
384
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Milpitas, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Milpitas, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed its dismissal on May 5, 2017. On April 4, 2017,
Plaintiff received the subscribers identity. Although the IP address traced to a retail
store, Plaintiff was quickly able to determine that the store had limited employees, and its
additional evidence pinpointed, Defendant, the owner of the retail store, as the infringer.
On April 7, 2017 Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint. Unfortunately, Plaintiff was
unable to obtain the summons in this case until April 26, 2017. Plaintiff filed a motion to
extend its service deadline, which was denied by this Court without prejudice. Plaintiff
ultimately determined it had to dismiss this case because it had not made diligent efforts
to receive the summons in person, causing unnecessary delays. Plaintiff and undersigned
sincerely apologize to the Court for its errors causing these delays and assure the Court
that, if in the future, Plaintiff files cases in this District, it will ensure it has counsel pick
up the summons in person to avoid needlessly burdening the Court with additional
extension requests.
387
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05855-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page389
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
389
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05855-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page390
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
390
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05855-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page391
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
391


Plaintiff
v.

172.9.234.15,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
172.9.234.15 06/05/2016
22:53:31

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
392
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

393
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
394

395
400
401
402
403
404
409
410
411
412
413
414
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this case because Plaintiff

inadvertently failed to file it's Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena on the
ISP and therefore did not receive the Defendant's identity. By the time Plaintiff realized
this error, such a motion would have likely been denied as untimely. Plaintiff sincerely
apologizes to the Court for its error and lack of due diligence.
417
ISP Response Trace City: Palo Alto, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff received Defendant's identity on March 31, 2017 and
immediately began its investigation on Defendant. Its investigation determined that the
subscriber was the most likely infringer based on numerous matches from Plaintiffs
additional evidence to Defendants hobbies, interests, and work background.
Unfortunately, Plaintiff did not file its Amended Complaint until April 25, 2017.
Plaintiff received the summons on April 26, 2017, and on April 28, 2017 requested an
extension of service, which was denied without prejudice.
Because Plaintiff knew its investigation was not completed fast enough, Plaintiff did not
renew its extension request, believing it could not show due diligence. Plaintiff and
undersigned sincerely apologize to the Court for this inconvenience and assure the Court
that if Plaintiff ever files suit in this District again, it will do so only in small increments
and diligently manage its deadlines.
418
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06111-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page419
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
419
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06111-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page420
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
420
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06111-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page421
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
421


Plaintiff
v.

24.130.56.150,
Defendant.


UTC
24.130.56.150 06/26/2016
13:49:43

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

422
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

423
(page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying,
testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena inspecting the premisesor to producing
may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or electronically stored information in the form or
deposition only as follows: forms requested. The objection must be served
(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, before the earlier of the time specified for
is employed, or regularly transacts business in compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
person; or If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, person, the serving party may move the court for the
if the person district where compliance is required for an order
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or compelling production or inspection.
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would (ii) These acts may be required only as directed
incur substantial expense. in the order, and the order must protect a person who
is neither a party nor a partys officer from
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may significant expense resulting from compliance.
command:
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is the district where compliance is required must quash
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or modify a subpoena that:
and
or
issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to
steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on or affected by a subpoena, the court for the district
a person subject to the subpoena. The court for the where compliance is required may, on motion, quash
district where compliance is required must enforce or modify the subpoena if it requires:
this duty and impose an appropriate sanction (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
which may include lost earnings and reasonable research, development, or commercial information;
attorneys feeson a party or attorney who fails to or
comply. (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the
commanded to produce documents, electronically court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
the inspection of premises, need not appear in person specified conditions if the serving party:
at the place of production or inspection unless also (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or
commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue
trial. hardship; and
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

424
the discovery.
Information. These procedures apply to producing (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding
documents or electronically stored information: subpoenaed information under a claim that it is
privileged or subject to protection as trial-
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
must organize and label them to correspond to the documents, communications, or tangible things in a
categories in the demand. manner that, without revealing information itself
of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified,
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy
in Only One Form. The person responding need not the specified information and any copies it has; must
produce the same electronically stored information not use or disclose the information until the claim is
in more than one form. resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the
information if the party disclosed it before being
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored notified; and may promptly present the information
Information. The person responding need not under seal to the court for the district where
provide discovery of electronically stored compliance is required for a determination of the
information from sources that the person identifies claim. The person who produced the information
as not reasonably accessible because of undue must preserve the information until the claim is
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or resolved.
discovery from such sources if the requesting party requiredand also, after a motion is transferred, the
shows good cause, considering the limitations of issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person who,
Rule having been served, fails without adequate excuse to
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

425
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Redwood City, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On March 27, 2017 Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because
Comcast could not identify the Defendant.
429
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05827-WHA
Document
Document
27-311 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page430
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
430
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05827-WHA
Document
Document
27-311 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page431
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
431
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05827-WHA
Document
Document
27-311 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page432
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
432


Plaintiff
v.

24.5.14.8,
Defendant.


UTC
24.5.14.8 05/26/2016
04:24:13

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

433
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

434
(page 3)
(c) Place of Compliance. subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying,
testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena inspecting the premisesor to producing
may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or electronically stored information in the form or
deposition only as follows: forms requested. The objection must be served
(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, before the earlier of the time specified for
is employed, or regularly transacts business in compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served.
person; or If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
employed, or regularly transacts business in person, person, the serving party may move the court for the
if the person district where compliance is required for an order
(i) Is a person's party's officer; or compelling production or inspection.
(ii) Is commanded to attend a trial and would (ii) These acts may be required only as directed
incur substantial expense. in the order, and the order must protect a person who
is neither a party nor a partys officer from
(2) For Other Discovery: A subpoena may significant expense resulting from compliance.
command:
within 100 miles of where the person resides, is the district where compliance is required must quash
employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or modify a subpoena that:
and
or
issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to
steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on or affected by a subpoena, the court for the district
a person subject to the subpoena. The court for the where compliance is required may, on motion, quash
district where compliance is required must enforce or modify the subpoena if it requires:
this duty and impose an appropriate sanction (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential
which may include lost earnings and reasonable research, development, or commercial information;
attorneys feeson a party or attorney who fails to or
comply. (ii) disclosing an unretained experts opinion or
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the
commanded to produce documents, electronically court may, instead of quashing or modifying a
the inspection of premises, need not appear in person specified conditions if the serving party:
at the place of production or inspection unless also (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or
commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue
trial. hardship; and
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

435
the discovery.
Information. These procedures apply to producing (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding
documents or electronically stored information: subpoenaed information under a claim that it is
privileged or subject to protection as trial-
as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or (ii) describe the nature of the withheld
must organize and label them to correspond to the documents, communications, or tangible things in a
categories in the demand. manner that, without revealing information itself
of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified,
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy
in Only One Form. The person responding need not the specified information and any copies it has; must
produce the same electronically stored information not use or disclose the information until the claim is
in more than one form. resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the
information if the party disclosed it before being
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored notified; and may promptly present the information
Information. The person responding need not under seal to the court for the district where
provide discovery of electronically stored compliance is required for a determination of the
information from sources that the person identifies claim. The person who produced the information
as not reasonably accessible because of undue must preserve the information until the claim is
burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or resolved.
discovery from such sources if the requesting party requiredand also, after a motion is transferred, the
shows good cause, considering the limitations of issuing courtmay hold in contempt a person who,
Rule having been served, fails without adequate excuse to
26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

436
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Freemont, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On March 17, 2017 Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because
Comcast could not identify the Defendant.
440
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05848-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page441
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
441
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05848-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page442
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
442
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05848-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page443
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
443


Plaintiff
v.

24.6.75.159,
Defendant.


818 West Seventh Street, Ste. 930
UTC
24.6.75.159 06/02/2016
15:16:15

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

444
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

445
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

446

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

447
ISP Response Trace City: Danville, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On April 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal in this case
because its investigation revealed that the subscriber is an elderly female woman with
limited financial means. Because Plaintiff does not desire to pursue cases against the
elderly, nor cause financial hardship, Plaintiff decided to dismiss the case.
451
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05974-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page452
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
452
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05974-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page453
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
453
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05974-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page454
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
454


Plaintiff
v.

50.131.211.10,
Defendant.


UTC
50.131.211.10 06/20/2016
20:12:03

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
[ ] Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises,
land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below,
so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property
or any designated object or operation on it.
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

455
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

456
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

457

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

458
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because Comcast could not
identify the subscriber.
462
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05825-WHA
Document
Document
27-311 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page463
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
463
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05825-WHA
Document
Document
27-311 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page464
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
464
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05825-WHA
Document
Document
27-311 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page465
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
465


Plaintiff
v.

50.174.0.6,
Defendant.


UTC
50.174.0.6 05/21/2016
23:39:15

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

466
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

467
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

468

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

469
ISP Response Trace City: San Jose, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On April 14, 2017 Plaintiff filed its voluntary dismissal because its
investigation determined that the subscriber was an elderly man living with several
family members. Plaintiff was unable to determine which family member was
responsible based upon its initial investigation so decided not to pursue its case.
473
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06242-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page474
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
474
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06242-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page475
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
475
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06242-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page476
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
476


Plaintiff
v.

50.174.248.138,
Defendant.


UTC
50.174.248.138 07/04/2016
17:19:05

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

477
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

478
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

479

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

480
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Palo Alto, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because Comcast could not
identify the subscriber.
484
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05826-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page485
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
485
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05826-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page486
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
486
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05826-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page487
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
487


Plaintiff
v.

50.184.242.50
Defendant.


UTC
50.184.242.50 05/24/2016
23:35:11

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

488
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

489
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

490

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

491
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Novato, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Novato, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because, after an investigation,

Plaintiff determined that the subscriber was a business entity, and Plaintiff was unable to
identify the individual at the business entity responsible for the infringement.
495
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06245-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page496
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
496
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06245-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page497
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
497
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06245-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page498
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
498


Plaintiff
v.

50.193.16.126,
Defendant.


UTC
50.193.16.126 07/06/2016
21:04:54

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

499
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

500
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

501

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

502
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Novato, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Novato, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because, after an investigation,

Plaintiff determined that the subscriber was a family run computer repair company.
Plaintiffs additional evidence contained several infringements relating to computer
repair. However, its investigation revealed that the infringers may either be the father or
several adult sons. Unable to pinpoint the exact infringer, Plaintiff exercised caution and
did not proceed with its case.
506
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05923-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page507
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
507
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05923-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page508
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
508
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05923-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page509
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
509


Plaintiff
v.

50.254.156.145,
Defendant.


UTC
50.254.156.145 06/09/2016
22:08:31

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

510
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

511
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

512

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

513
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Alameda, CA
ISP Response Trace City: San Leandro, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on April 13, 2017 because, after
an investigation, it appeared as if the infringer was the teenage son of the subscriber.
Plaintiff does not desire to pursue cases against minors, so ultimately decided to dismiss
the case.
517
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06241-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page518
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
518
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06241-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page519
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
519
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06241-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page520
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
520


Plaintiff
v.

67.160.223.104,
Defendant.


UTC
67.160.223.104 07/04/2016
16:34:43

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

521
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

522
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

523

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

524
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on November 17, 2016 because
it realized the infringement dates in this case were out of any reasonable or known data
retention for Internet Service Providers and therefore Plaintiff knew that the ISP would
not be able to identify the subscriber.
528
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Cupertino, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Cupertino, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on April 25, 2017 because, after
lengthy negotiations with Defendants counsel, the parties reached settlement.
529
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06110-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page530
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
530
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06110-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page531
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
531
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06110-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page532
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
532


Plaintiff
v.

67.169.164.203,
Defendant.


UTC
67.169.164.203 06/26/2016
11:17:01

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

533
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

534
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

535

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

536
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Fremont, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Fremont, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff received Defendant's identity on or around March 31, 2017
and began its investigation on Defendant. Due to an internal delay, Plaintiff did not file
it's Amended Complaint until April 28, 2017. Plaintiff's deadline to effectuate service
was May 4, 2017. Plaintiff knew it would not be able to comply with this deadline and
subsequently dismissed this case. Plaintiff and undersigned sincerely apologize to the
Court for its delays.
540
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06147-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page541
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
541
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06147-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page542
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
542
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06147-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page543
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
543


Plaintiff
v.

67.169.6.154,
Defendant.


UTC
67.169.6.154 07/02/2016
07:34:26

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

544
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

545
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

546

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

547
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Concord, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Lafayette, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on May 10, 2017
because, after lengthy negotiations with opposing counsel, the parties reached settlement.
551
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06243-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page552
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
552
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06243-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page553
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
553
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06243-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page554
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
554


Plaintiff
v.

67.174.205.201,
Defendant.


UTC
67.174.205.201 07/05/2016
07:46:17

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

555
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

556
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

557

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

558
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Mateo, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Redwood City, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff voluntary dismissed this case because, after an

investigation, it determined the Defendant was a student with financial hardship. Plaintiff
determined it was in its, and Defendants, best interest to not pursue litigation.
562
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06106-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page563
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
563
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06106-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page564
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
564
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06106-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page565
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
565


Plaintiff
v.

67.180.164.232,
Defendant.


UTC
67.180.164.232 06/24/2016
18:37:40

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

566
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

567
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

568

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

569
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Santa Cruz, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Santa Cruz, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff received Defendants identification on March 31, 2017.

Plaintiff conducted an investigation and determined that the subscriber is a female
cosmetologist who did not appear to be the infringer. The most likely infringer was an
individual who appeared to be her boyfriend, a boat captain. Because it was unclear
whether the most likely infringer resided in the household, and based on his potential
transient nature, Plaintiff decided to dismiss out of an abundance of caution.
573
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06239-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page574
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
574
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06239-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page575
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
575
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06239-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page576
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
576


Plaintiff
v.

71.198.90.46,
Defendant.


UTC
71.198.90.46 07/04/2016
08:51:17

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

577
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

578
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

579

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

580
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Santa Rosa, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on March 17, 2017, because
Comcast could not identify the infringer.
584
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05925-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page585
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
585
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05925-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page586
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
586
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05925-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page587
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
587


Plaintiff
v.

73.158.147.228,
Defendant.


UTC
73.158.147.228 06/14/2016
03:59:53

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

588
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

589
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

590

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

591
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Oakland, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on November 17, 2016 because
it determined that the infringement dates were out of data retention and the ISP would not
be able to identify the infringer.
596
Voluntary Dismissal: On April 12, 2017 Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because,
after investigation, it determined that the infringer was not likely the subscriber, but
instead his adult son. Indeed, patterns of infringement suggested a person visiting, and
Plaintiffs additional evidence matched the sons hobbies and interests. Plaintiff
ultimately dismissed because it could not pinpoint the exact address of the sons
residence, to pursue its claim.
597
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05976-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page598
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
598
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05976-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page599
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
599
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05976-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page600
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
600


Plaintiff
v.

73.222.7.181,
Defendant.


UTC
73.222.7.181 06/23/2016
13:52:23

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

601
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

602
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

603

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

604
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Dublin, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff voluntary dismissed this case on November 17, 2016
because it realized that the infringement dates were out of data retention and the ISP
would not be able to identify the Defendant.
608
Status: Plaintiff has amended its complaint to pursue litigation and is currently in
settlement negotiations with Defendants counsel.
609
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06143-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page610
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
610
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06143-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page611
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
611
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06143-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page612
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
612


Plaintiff
v.

73.231.156.90,
Defendant.


UTC
73.231.156.90 06/30/2016
06:24:41

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

613
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

614
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

615

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

616
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Castro Valley, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal on March 27, 2017 because
Comcast cable could not identify the subscriber.
620
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05849-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page621
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
621
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05849-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page622
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
622
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05849-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page623
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
623


Plaintiff
v.

73.252.154.135,
Defendant.


UTC
73.252.154.135 06/05/2016
04:12:46

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

624
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

625
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

626

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

627
Status: Plaintiff has not yet received the identity of the Defendant and is awaiting a
response from AT&T. Plaintiff anticipates it will receive it June 2, 2017.
631
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06247-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page633
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
633
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06247-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page634
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
634
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06247-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page635
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
635


Plaintiff
v.

75.50.86.25,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
75.50.86.25 07/07/2016
00:08:07

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
636
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

637
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
638

639
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on March 17, 2017 because
Comcast Cable could not identify the subscriber.
641
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05829-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page642
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
642
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05829-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page643
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
643
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05829-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page644
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
644


Plaintiff
v.

76.102.116.207,
Defendant.


UTC
76.102.116.207 06/01/2016
05:43:52

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

645
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

646
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

647

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

648
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Pleasanton, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Pleasanton, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because the Court denied
Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service. Plaintiff received
Defendant's Identity on or around March 31, 2017 and filed its Amended Complaint on
April 13, 2017. The Court issued the Summons on April 26, 2017. Plaintiff's deadline to
effectuate service was May 4, 2017. Plaintiff knew it would not be able to comply with
this deadline and the Court denied a motion requesting an extension of same. Plaintiff
and undersigned sincerely apologize to the Court for the delays in expeditiously serving
the John Doe defendant.
652
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06144-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page653
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
653
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06144-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page654
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
654
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06144-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page655
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
655


Plaintiff
v.

76.102.154.118,
Defendant.


UTC
76.102.154.118 06/30/2016
16:34:24

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

656
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

657
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

658

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

659
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: El Cerrito, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Albany, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal on April 25, 2017, because after
negotiations with opposing counsel, the parties reached settlement agreement.
663
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05977-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page664
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
664
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05977-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page665
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
665
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05977-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page666
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
666


Plaintiff
v.

76.102.87.133,
Defendant.


UTC
76.102.87.133 06/24/2016
00:29:42

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

667
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

668
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

669

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

670
674
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05823-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page675
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
675
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05823-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page676
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
676
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05823-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page677
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
677


Plaintiff
v.

76.126.33.91,
Defendant.


UTC
76.126.33.91 05/19/2016
02:38:02

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

678
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

679
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

680

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

681
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Rohnert Park, CA
685
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06112-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page686
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
686
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06112-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page687
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
687
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06112-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page688
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
688


Plaintiff
v.

76.21.65.14,
Defendant.


UTC
76.21.65.14 06/27/2016
12:37:46

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

689
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

690
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

691

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

692
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Carlos, CA
ISP Response Trace City: San Carlos, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On May 4, 2017, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because

Plaintiff reached settlement agreement with Defendants counsel.
697
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05737-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page699
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
699
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05737-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page700
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
700
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05737-WHA
Document
Document
27-313 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page701
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
701


Plaintiff
v.

76.220.20.27,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
76.220.20.27 04/18/2016
14:09:09

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
702
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

703
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
704

705
708
709
710
711
712
U-Verse Customer Account Details

Important Note: AT&T U-Verse internet access accounts do not have traditional session records with
a standard log on/log off format. U-Verse customers have a unique IP directly provisioned to the
account. Please reference the Historical IP Provisioning section below for dates and specific details.
>Current Account Information
>Historical IP Provisioning
TXID DATE RC Message Key/Vals
ban:
sbcgnfttxassociateduid:
Port and ip_assigned: 76.220.20.27 [H]
04/18/2016 13:48:58 101 BAN rg:
Match siteid:
circuit:
port:
ban:
sbcgnfttxassociateduid
ip_assigned: 76.220.20.27 [H]
rg:
OK Port sbcgnfttxsap:
04/19/2016 01:27:47 101
Modified
siteid:
circuit:
port:
716
AT&T Proprietary
The information contained here is for use by authorized person only and is not for general distribution.
ISP Response Trace City: Sunnyvale, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: On March 29, 2017, Plaintiff received Defendants identity. After
an investigation, Plaintiff determined that the subscriber was likely the infringer.
Unfortunately, it did not file its amended complaint until April 13, 2017. Plaintiff did not
receive the summons until April 26, 2017. On May 1, 2017 the Court denied Plaintiffs
extension request to serve without prejudice. Because Plaintiff did not have its counsel
attempt to pick up the summons in person, Plaintiff believed it could not show due
diligence in a renewed motion. For these reasons, Plaintiff decided to dismiss. Plaintiff
and undersigned apologize to the Court for its delays and state that if Plaintiff ever
decides to file cases in this District again, it will do so only in small amounts in which its
resources can assure proper case management.
719
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06141-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page721
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
721
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06141-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page722
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
722
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06141-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page723
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
723


Plaintiff
v.

76.220.56.83,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
76.220.56.83 06/28/2016
04:29:47

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
724
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

725
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
726

727
U-Verse Customer Account Details

Important Note: AT&T U-Verse internet access accounts do not have traditional session records with
a standard log on/log off format. U-Verse customers have a unique IP directly provisioned to the
account. Please reference the Historical IP Provisioning section below for dates and specific details.
Current Account Information
BAN:
Circuit Id:
CMS Policy:
DHCP Relay:
DSLAM:
HSIA Registered: yes
IP: 76.220.56.128
MAC Addr:
MemberId:
Historical IP Provisioning
Messag
TXID DATE RC Key/Vals
e
ban:
sbcgnfttxassociateduid:
ip_assigned: 76.220.56.83 [H]
01/18/2016 OK -
100 rg:
20:46:33 Success
siteid:
circuit:
port:
ban:
sbcgnfttxassociateduid
ip_assigned: 76.220.56.83 [H]
OK Port
rg
08/23/2016 Modified
102 sbcgnfttxsap:
11:20:26 Policy
Modified
siteid:
circuit:
port:
729
AT&T Proprietary
The information contained here is for use by authorized person only and is not for general distribution.
732
733
734
735
736
737
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Ramon, CA
ISP Response Trace City: San Ramon, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntarily dismissed because subscriber was

female and Plaintiff's investigators were unable to locate sufficient evidence to name the
likely third party infringer - the subscriber's husband.
738
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05845-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page740
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
740
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05845-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page741
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
741
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05845-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page742
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
742


Plaintiff
v.

76.247.189.251,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
76.247.189.251 06/02/2016
02:31:05

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
743
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

744
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
745

746
752
753
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Oakland, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Oakland, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Voluntarily dismissed because the Court denied Plaintiff's Motion
for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service. Plaintiff received Defendant's Identity on or
around March 31, 2017 and filed its Amended Complaint on April 13, 2017. The Court
issued the Summons on April 26, 2017. Plaintiff's deadline to effectuate service was May
5, 2017. Plaintiff knew it would not be able to comply with this deadline and the Court
denied a motion requesting an extension of same. Plaintiff apologizes to the Court for its
delay and will make every effort to limit the amount of suits filed and ensure it has
adequate resources to promptly effectuate service in the future.
757
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06107-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page758
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
758
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06107-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page759
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
759
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-06107-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page760
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
760


Plaintiff
v.

98.207.248.50,
Defendant.


UTC
98.207.248.50 06/25/2016
05:13:33

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

761
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

762
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

763

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

764
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Dublin, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Pleasanton, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal because the subscriber was
elderly and Plaintiff does not pursue cases against the elderly.
768
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05972-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page769
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
769
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05972-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page770
2 ofof3798
2
on Comcast.
4

15
26
27
28
2
770
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05972-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/01/17 Page
Page771
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
771


Plaintiff
v.

98.248.91.69,
Defendant.


UTC
98.248.91.69 06/20/2016
03:54:12

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

772
Date: 2/3/17
CLERK OF COURT

Esq.

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

773
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

774

Certified Mail #: 7016 1970 0000 0900 3313

775
Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Albany, CA
ISP Response Trace City: Richmond, CA
Voluntary Dismissal: Plaintiff filed a voluntarily dismissal on April 18, 2017 because,
after an investigation, it appeared that the infringer was not the subscriber but instead, the
subscribers husband. However, Plaintiff could not successfully rule out the possibility
that the infringer was not the subscribers teenage son. Because it could have been either,
Plaintiff decided it was best not to pursue the case.
779
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05973-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page781
1 ofof3798
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
Plaintiff,
12

15 Defendant.
/
16
28 infringing act.
781
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05973-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page782
2 ofof3798
2
on AT&T.
4

15
26
27
28
2
782
Case
Case
3:16-cv-05975-WHA
3:16-cv-05973-WHA
Document
Document
27-312 Filed
Filed05/17/17
02/02/17 Page
Page783
3 ofof3798
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
783


Plaintiff
v.

99.47.68.147,
Defendant.


Legal Compliance
11760 Highway 1
Suite 600
Facsimile: (888) 938-4715
UTC
99.47.68.147 06/20/2016
13:22:55

Telephone: (310) 734-4269
[ ] Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises,
land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below,
so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property
or any designated object or operation on it.
784
Date: 2/6/17
CLERK OF COURT
____________________________ OR /s/ Henrik

Mosesi, Esq.

785
(page 3)
Enforcement. or
786

787
792
793
794
795
796

CAND 16 CV 05975 WHA Document 27 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CAND 16 CV 05975 WHA Document 27 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 3:16-cv-05975-WHA Document 27-3 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 798

Case Number: 3:16-cv-6109-WHA

Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: Antioch, CA

ISP Response Trace City: Antioch, CA

Correct District: Yes

Date Filed: October 23, 2016

Status: Voluntarily Dismissed on April 6, 2017

v. ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

challenge the disclosure of any identifying information. Malibu Media

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC Civil Action No: 3:16-cv-06109-WHA

John Doe subscriber assigned to IP address

SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO

To: AT&T Internet Services

Place: Henrik Mosesi, Esq. Date and Time:

Place: Date and Time:

____________________________ OR /s/ Henrik Mosesi,

Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena

(c) Place of Compliance. inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

(A) Information Withheld. A person

Case Number: 3:16-cv-5824-WHA

Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Jose, CA

ISP Response Trace City: N/A

Correct District: N/A

Date Filed: October 9, 2016

v. ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

challenge the disclosure of any identifying information. Malibu Media

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC Civil Action No: 3:16-cv-05824-WHA

John Doe subscriber assigned to IP address

SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO

To: AT&T Internet Services

Place: Henrik Mosesi, Esq. Date and Time:

Place: Date and Time:

____________________________ OR /s/ Henrik Mosesi,

Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena

(c) Place of Compliance. of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

(A) Information Withheld. A person

Case Number: 3:16-cv-6240-WHA

Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Jose, CA

ISP Response Trace City: San Jose, CA

Correct District: Yes

Date Filed: October 28, 2016

Status: Active case Plaintiff is in the process of reaching a settlement agreement

v. ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

challenge the disclosure of any identifying information. Malibu Media

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC Civil Action No: 3:16-cv-06240-WHA

John Doe subscriber assigned to IP address

SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO

To: AT&T Internet Services

Place: Henrik Mosesi, Esq. Date and Time:

Place: Date and Time:

____________________________ OR /s/ Henrik Mosesi,

Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena

Information. These procedures apply to producing

Case Number: 3:16-cv-5922-WHA

Maxmind Geolocation Trace City: San Carlos, CA