‘Nevada System of Higher Education
Snort Risen
Sot geet pans seataer
ae. semana
Nevada Systm of Higher Education
0S Maryan Poy
las eas, wv as119|
ear Mr, Gould
"am iting to noty you that have become aware of aeons that constitute ineppropi
osiblyillegl behavior by our Board Charman, ick Tachok.
(on Api 20,2017, after a discussion regarding the aid national search, the Ad-hoc Chancellor Search
Committee approved a motion authorizing the Committe Chi, Kevin Pate to cicur the poston wth
Internal candidat). However, n the Las Vegas Review-Journal atle dated May 3, 2017, Chirean
Trachok steed, "was very pleased that when | approached him again after the committee meeting he
‘greed to take the ob” This action wasa dreet contradiction tthe formal ation taken by the Adhoe
Chancel Search Commitee.
‘Additionally atthe December 6, 2016 meeting ofthe Adthoc Chancellor Search Commitee, he
Committee agreed ona proces to embark upon a serch interview rast and make 8
recommendation tothe fll Board of Regents. Ato referenced at histime were similar processes used
foradshoe presidental searches, Chaieman Tachok’s actions to hol special meeting without ing
‘the Ad-hoc ChanclorSeorch Commitee the opportunity to full duty of making a recommandstion
tothe full Boardof Regents, specially bated on the agreed upon proce for his periar
(Chancellor's search and the hstvieal prarien othe Board of Regent in other searches
In both ofthese instances, its important to note that no one regent, inclutng the Chal can override
the Board or 2 Committee ofthe Board.
Further, atthe Ape 20, 2017 meeting, you advised the Ad-hoe Chancellor Search Committe multiple
times throughout the meeting about the requirements ofthe Open Meeting Law and thet we Would be
Violating the Open Meeting Law to discuss the character or characteristic ofa porieuae candidat rom
\whom you didnot obtain a signed waiver and ad othe agenda. Infact, Chancellor Joh whites name
was stated open, and you strongly advised that was inapproprits in regards tothe Open Meting
law. After this lengthy scussion and carfication ofthe requrements ofthe Open Meeting Law, chair
yf ea Ls «try of a ry Nr Cle set ser se
ceo hon hes re ae Tai a om i Won es ae‘Trathok proceeded to discuss Chancellor White specifically, even caing him the “Gold Sandra”
laty, this wasa violation ofthe Open Meeting Law.
As the Board of Regents, we must shun even the appearance of unethical behavior, and this proces has
‘been marred. Chancellor White didnot participate nthe Chancellor Search proces, which again,
‘deviate rom standard historical practices Infact, tis deviation wes questioned mulpe tera
‘mukple Aho Chancellor Search Connmitee meetings. nhs absence, Chair Trachok was engaged in
the search process intimately, including interviews. Dung his engagement inthe search process, Chale
‘Trachokboth publicly and privately advocated for Chancellor White to take the permanent role direct,