Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOR
AT
Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam Village, Avinashi Taluk,
Tiruppur district, Tamil Nadu
JANUARY 2017
Preface
PREFACE
Approved by : K. S. Muneeswaran
Signed :
Date : 2017-01-30
This report has been prepared in line with the TOR conditions stated by SEIAA,
Tamil Nadu vide Letter No. SEIAA,TN/F4414/2015/TOR 253/SEZ/8b/TIR/2016
dt. 11.07.2016
This report has been prepared by Vimta Labs Limited with all reasonable skill,
care and diligence within the terms of the contract with the client, incorporating
our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the
resources devoted to it by agreement with the client.
Table of Contents
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific
(Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up
area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi
Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents i
List of Figures iii
List of Tables iv
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the report 1
1.2 Identification of project and Project Proponent 2
1.3 Brief Description of the Project 2
1.4 Scope of the Study 10
2 Project Description
2.1 Need for the project 13
2.2 Project location 13
2.3 Magnitude of the project 13
2.4 Process description 14
2.5 Project details and requirement 18
2.6 Building materials 22
2.7 Raw material requirement 22
2.8 Water requirement 23
2.9 Manpower requirement 25
2.10 Wastewater generation and treatment 25
2.11 Air pollution 30
2.12 Rainwater harvesting system 30
2.13 Solid waste management 33
2.14 Greenbelt development 34
Table of Contents
7 Additional Studies
7.1 Risk assessment 125
7.2 Hazard assessment and evaluation 125
7.3 Disaster management plan 131
7.4 Social impact assessment 133
7.5 Rehabilitation & resettlement action plans 133
8 Project Benefits
8.1 Improvement in the physical infrastructure 135
8.2 Improvement in the social infrastructure 135
9 Administrative aspects
9.1 Justification for implementation of the project 139
9.2 Summary of anticipated environmental impact and mitigation 139
9.3 Environment Management cell 133
11 Disclosure of Consultants
11.1 Introduction 153
11.2 The Quality Policy 153
11.3 Milestones and Accreditations 153
11.4 Management and Board of Directors 154
11.5 Services offered 155
11.6 Services 155
11.7 Facilities 156
11.8 Quality Systems 157
11.9 Achievements 157
Table of Contents
ANNEXURES
Annexure # Title
Table of Contents
LIST OF FIGURES
Table of Contents
LIST OF TABLES
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As per the EIA Notification dated 14th September 2006, the proposed project falls
under Category B1 under Schedule No. 8(b) [Townships and Area
Development projects], for which Environmental Clearance (EC) from SEIAA is
necessary. This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report is prepared to
obtain Environmental Clearance (EC) from State Environmental Impact
Assessment Authority (SEIAA) of Tamil Nadu and Consent for Establishment
(CFE) from Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB).
In-line with the EIA Notification, 76th SEAC meeting was held on 30th June 2016
for determining TOR for the preparation of EIA report for the proposed project.
This EIA has been prepared based on the TOR conditions stated by SEIAA vide
Letter No. SEIAA-TN/F-4414/2015/ToR-253/SEZ/8(b)/TIR/2016 dated.
11.7.2016. A copy of TOR letter is enclosed as Annexure I.
The objective of EIA is to foresee the potential environmental problems that would
crop up out from proposed sector specific SEZ of M/s. IG3 Infra Limited,
(Hereinafter referred to as IG3) and address them in the project planning and
design stage.
To review the current environmental status of the project site, and its
surrounding area, to estimate the pollution that would occur after
commissioning the textile SEZ, and its impact on the surrounding environment
To propose a Post Project Monitoring Plan (PPMP) to ensure that the EMP
achieves its desired objectives
IG3 has engaged the services of M/s. Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore
to undertake Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies for assessing the
impact of the entire project on various environmental parameters in the study area
and to prepare an Environment Management Plan for managing the adverse
impacts of the proposed project.
The current portfolio of the Company primarily comprises of Chennai One IT/ITeS
SEZ, Bangalore Data Centre Tier III and more.
The Company focuses on key growth of Manchester cities and industrial towns
like Surat-Gujarat, Chennai, Bangalore and Coimbatore etc. which would in the
opinion of the management provide attractive yields.
TABLE-1.1
PROJECT DETAILS
Area
Sr. No.
Particulars ha acres (%)
1 Industrial sheds 21.7 53.6 22.3
2 Open parking area 1.0 2.5 1.0
3 Road 5.0 12.4 5.1
4 Green belt area 33.2 82.1 34.1
5 OSR area 9.8 24.2 10.1
6 Solar power plant 5.3 13.1 5.4
7 Warehouses 10.0 24.7 10.3
8 Open area 5.0 12.4 5.1
9 Rainwater harvesting pond 5.0 12.4 5.1
10 ETP, STP, SW Storage 1.5 3.7 1.5
Total 97.5 241 100
DG Sets
3 Nos. x 185 KVA
Total fuel Requirement: Diesel 37 L/hr/DG
Mode of storage: Each DG Set will be provided with in-
built diesel storage of 200 Litres
Air pollution/noise DG Sets will be provided with
generation sources
Stack height of 3m above the building height.
Suitable acoustic enclosure to minimize noise.
Total investment of Rs. 70.93/- Crores
the project/activity.
Funds allocated for Capital cost: Rs. 84.0 Lakhs
EMP Recurring cost: Rs. 37.0 Lakhs/annum
The proposed project site is 0.7-km away from the National Highway connecting
Salem with Kochi. The nearest Railway Station is Uthukuli, which is at a distance
of about 5.1 km in South direction. The nearest airport is at Coimbatore which is
located at a distance of 48 km in SW direction. The project site falls in Survey No.
126, 129, 132, 135 144, 151- 161, 165. 166, 167, 171, 178, 209, 216-218,
229, 232, 235, 237 Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam Village, Avinashi Taluk,
Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu State.
The environmental setting of the project is given in Table-1.2. The index map of
the project site is shown in Figure-1.1 and study area map of 10 km radius is
shown in Figure-1.2. Aerial view of the project site is given in Figure-1.3
Project Site
FIGURE-1.1
INDEX MAP OF THE PROJECT SITE
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 6
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific (Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha
with a build-up area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 1
Introduction
FIGURE-1.2
10-KM STUDY AREA MAP GOOGLE MAP
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 7
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific (Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha
with a build-up area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 1
Introduction
FIGURE-1.3
AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPOSED SITE
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 8
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific
(Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up
area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi
Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 1
Introduction
TABLE-1.2
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Sr.
Particulars Details
No.
1 Site co-ordinates
Latitude Longitude
A 11o 12 36.57 N 77o 26 23.65 E
B 11o 12 53.39 N 79o 27 09.06 E
C 11o 12 21.85 N 79o 27 13.39 E
D 11o 12 06.73 N 79o 26 49.48 E
2 Site Elevation 299 m AMSL
3 Climatic Conditions Annual Max. Temp: 380C
(IMD, Chennai) Annual Min. Temp: 180C
Annual Total Rainfall: 574.3 -mm
4 Land use classification Unclassified as per DTCP
5 Nearest Highway NH-47 (0.7 km, North)
6 Nearest Railway station Uthukuli R.S (5.2 km, South)
7 Nearest airport Coimbatore Airport (48.0 km, ESE)
8 Nearest seaport Kochi Port (189 km, SW)
9 Socio economic factors No resettlement and rehabilitation issues
10 Forest areas Kongampalayam R.F (6.0 km, NNE)
Vayappadi R.F (6.5 km, ESE)
11 Ecologically sensitive Nil within 10 km radius
zones such as Biospheres,
Sanctuaries, National
parks
12 Inland rivers/ water Noyyel River (9.2 km, South)
bodies
13 Defense installations/ Nil within 10 km radius
Historical monuments
14 Historical/ Archaeological Nil within 10 km radius
places
15 Nearest habitation Samaiarpalayam (2.2 km, North)
16 Seismicity Zone Zone III as per IS:1893 (Part -1) 2002
17 Nearby Hospitals Apollo hospitals, Chengapalli
Vijayamangalam Govt. hospital
Kunnathur Govt Hospital
18 Nearby Industries Sakthi autocomponents (7.2 km, NE)
The area falling within 10 km radius from the project site is defined as the study
area. The scope of this study broadly includes:
To conduct literature review and to collect data relevant to the study area;
Establishing the baseline environmental aspects in and around the proposed
site;
Identifying various pollution loads due to various activities;
Predicting incremental levels of pollutants in the study area due to the
proposed project;
Evaluating the predicted impacts on various environmental attributes in the
study area by using scientifically developed and widely accepted
Environmental Impact Assessment methodologies;
To prepare an Environment Management Plan (EMP), outlining the measures
for improving the environmental quality in view of future for an
environmentally sustainable development; and
Identifying critical environmental attributes that are required to be monitored
in the post-project scenario.
TABLE-1.3
ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES AND FREQUENCY OF MONITORING
Sr.
Attributes Parameters Frequency
No.
1. Ambient air PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOX, 24 hourly samples twice a
quality CO, Pb, As, Ni, C6H6, BaP, week at 8 locations
O3, NH3
2. Meteorology Wind speed, Direction, One hourly recording of wind
temperature, Relative speed, wind direction, cloud
humidity, Rainfall, cloud cover, temperature at
cover and atmospheric 1 location
pressure
3. Water quality Physical, Chemical and Grab samples were collected
Bacteriological parameters. from eight locations once
As per IS-10500/IS-2296 during the study period
and EPA Act as applicable
4. Ecology Existing terrestrial and Through field studies once
aquatic flora and fauna in during the study period and
the study area based on the review of
secondary data
5. Noise levels Noise levels in dB (A) Once during study period at
ten locations
6. Soil Parameters related to At six locations once during
Characteristics agricultural and the study period
afforestation potential
7. Land use Establishing land use Based on the land use data
pattern published in District Census
Handbook, 2011 and Satellite
imagery
8. Socio-Economic Socio-economic and work Based on published statistics
aspects force characteristics and of 2011 Census
other demographic aspects
9. Geology Geological history Geological data based on
data collected from secondary
sources
10. Hydrogeology Drainage area and pattern, Based on data collected from
nature of streams, aquifer secondary sources
characteristics, recharge
and discharge areas
This chapter highlights the factors supporting the selected site, features of the
proposed Textile SEZ site with layout, process details, utilities and services,
infrastructural facilities and sources of waste generation details and proposed safe
disposal of the waste.
The proposed project is a Sector Specific (Textile) SEZ of IG3 Infra Limited. The
Textile SEZ is proposed to be developed in 97.54 ha area in keeping with the
need for developing an integrated textile facilities for individual industrial units
covering Tiruppur, Erode & Coimbatore. The location and environmental setting of
the proposed project site is already presented in Chapter-1 of this report.
The proposed project will be developed in the outskirts of Tiruppur city. The
project site location and surrounding features are shown in Figure-2.1.
TABLE-2.1
DETAILS OF PROPOSED LAND USE
Area
Sr. No. Particulars
ha acres (%)
1 Industrial sheds 21.7 53.6 22.3
2 Open parking area 1.0 2.5 1.0
3 Road 5.0 12.4 5.1
4 Green belt area 33.2 82.1 34.1
5 OSR area 9.8 24.2 10.1
6 Solar power plant 5.3 13.1 5.4
7 Warehouses 10.0 24.7 10.3
8 Open area 5.0 12.4 5.1
9 Rainwater harvesting pond 5.0 12.4 5.1
10 ETP, STP, SW Storage 1.5 3.7 1.5
Total 97.5 241 100
TABLE-2.2
DETAILS OF THE LESSEE AND THEIR ALLOCATION AREA
The Sector Specific (Textile) SEZ will be developed with 26 industrial sheds for
various textile activities such as weaving, warping, sizing, dyeing and
garmenting. The flow chart of textile processing from Yarn cotton to end product
is given in Figure-2.2.
2.4.1 General
In a cotton textile mill, the carded, combed and spun raw cotton is warped and
sized (slashed) into a mono colour and multi-colour fabrics. All these processes
are dry processes except sizing. The process flow diagram is provided in Figure-
2.1.
2.4.2.1 Yarn
Yarn is a long continuous length of interlocked fibres, suitable for use in the
production of textiles, sewing, crocheting, knitting, weaving, embroidery and rope
making. Dyed yarn / Grey yarn received in the form of Cone or Cheese package
received from outside Mills with below specified quantity.
2.4.2.2 Warping
It is a commonly known fact that fabrics are constructed through two major
techniques weaving and knitting apart from other minor techniques. In these
processes, two distinct sets of yarns called the warp and the weft are interlaced
with each other to form a fabric.
The fabric is separated in two steps of warping, direct warping is mono colour or
Grey fabrics and Sectional warping is Multi colour pattern.
2.4.2.2.1Sectional Warping
In put material received from stores, this machine application only for multicolor
pattern. Machine having Creel, leasing/ denting head, warping head, waxing head
and weavers beam head with downing / doffing arrangement. Input dyed yarn
packages mounting in creel against fabric pattern, Leasing / denting devices will
helps to separating the yarn, Waxing device will helps to coating lubrication,
Section Head will helps to groping the yarn against pattern, Finally beaming Head
produce required warp sheet and wound on weavers beam for weaving, 4 Nos of
Direct warping machine launching for feeding 420 Looms
2.4.2.2.2Direct Warping
In put material received from stores, this application only for Mono color or Grey
fabrics. Machine having Creel, leasing/denting head, warping head with
downing/doffing arrangement. Input grey yarn packages mounting in creel
against fabric width, Leasing / denting devices will helps to separating the yarn,
Beam Head will helps to groping the yarn against width of fabric, beaming Head
produce required warp sheet and wound on wrappers beam for sizing, 2 Nos of
Direct warping machine launching for feeding 420 Looms
2.4.2.3 Sizing
Sizing of the warp yarn is essential to reduce breakage of the yarn and thus
production stops on the weaving machine. The yarn is seized with starch and Poly
Vinyl Alcohol (PVA) or Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) to give necessary tensile
strength and smoothness required for weaving.
2.4.2.4 Looms
A loom is a device used to weave cloth. The basic purposes of any loom are to
hold the warp threads under tension to facilitate the interweaving of the weft
threads. Warp yarn & weft yarn interlacement process done in Dobby/Jacquard
looms
2.4.2.5 Inspections
The cloth Roll is received from looms and the grade is inspected and the
inspected cloth bundles are sending to processing unit.
2.4.2.6 Garments
Processed cloth bundles received from processing unit and confection process
done in Garment section.
Finally the quality and quantity is inspected and the finished goods are packed
and dispatched
Yarn
Sec.Warpin Dir.
g Warping
Sizing
Looms
Inspections
Processing send to
outside
Garments
Final Inspection
FIGURE-2.1
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 17
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific
(Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up
area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi
Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 2
Project Description
The total plot area of the project is 97.54 ha (256 acres), which will be developed
in single phase. The facility will be designed to suit to the climate in Tiruppur and
fit well into the surroundings. The criterion for design was to create a sustainable
process with value engineering and to achieve this without extravagant
expenditure. The design concept considered for the proposed project is described
below:
The Master Plan is developed in concern with the climatic factors and site
conditions. The project site is mostly dry and flat. The site indicating levels and
contours is shown in Figure-2.2 and the site layout map is shown in Figure-2.3.
Providing good landscape view using the site contour is an important factor that is
considered for the master planning.
Main building
The proposed project will be having built-up area of 2,20,000 Sq.m is designed
for Textile SEZ.
Security Block
The security block is located at the entrance of the campus, which is the only
entry into the campus. This will be control point for employee and visitor
movement into the campus.
FIGURE-2.2
CONTOUR PLAN OF THE PROJECT SITE
FIGURE-2.3
SITE LAYOUT MAP
Common Infrastructure
Area leveling and land reclamation is very important activity. Even though the
proposed area is broadly even leveling and reclamation is done already. The
roads will be constructed to International standards. The internal roads within
the SEZ would have different width ranging from 30m and 20m.
Power requirement for the Textile SEZ is envisaged at 48 MW. This power will be
drawn from Captive power plant of 1 x 48 MW.
The area would need proper effluent treatment & sewerage facilities to treat
effluent and sewage. Wastewater lines will be laid along the roads to the STP.
Entire effluent & sewerage pipe lines would be under ground. An appropriate ETP
& STP technology and the treated water shall be reused within the premise.
Building Codes
The Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act 1971 (Tamil Nadu Act 35 of
1972) is being followed for this project. Apart from this, the campus will be
designed as a disabled friendly. The National Building Code shall be followed for
fire exits norms.
According to the IS Code 1893, the Indian Sub-Continent has been divided into
five seismic zone. Zone I and II are zones of Low Seismic Risk. IS 1983
which has been revised recently had bought change in the seismic zone map.
Zone I has been merged with Zone II. Tiruppur falls in Zone II.
The estimated power demand for park usage and industrial plots usage are 0.25
MW & 42.5 MW respectively. The power will be sourced from Thermal Power
plant. Incase of non-operation of power plant, power will be sourced from
TANGEDCO. The distribution system design option is based on safety of
personnel, protection of equipment, cost reliability and flexibility in operation.
Proposed scheme will be designed to be implemented in a single where the entire
power distribution infrastructure & equipment is planned and procured as
required.
The power supply will also be met from DG Sets during the power failure for
common amenities. The capacity of the proposed DG sets is 3 x 125 KVA which
will fulfill common requirement during the period of power failure.
The DG sets will be having inbuilt storage of fuel (HSD) and fuel requirement will
be sourced from nearby petrol bunks. DG sets will be housed inside acoustic
enclosures to bring down noise level below permissible limits. Also DG sets are
provided with noise silencers (10- 25 db(A)) and stack of adequate height.
The Sector Specific (Textile) Special Economic Zone (SEZ) will be developed while
adopting the best available technology and usage of raw materials with
appropriate specifications. The required building materials of the proposed project
are presented in Table-2.3.
TABLE-2.3
BUILDING MATERIAL REQUIREMENT
Mode of
Sr. No Raw Material Unit Quantity Source
Transportation
1 Cement T 162932 Local Suppliers Trucks
2 Sand Cum 66751 Local Suppliers Trucks
3 Jelly T 123714 Local Suppliers Trucks
4 Steel T 728 Local Suppliers Trucks
5 Bricks Nos 4725025 Local Suppliers Trucks
The raw materials required for the textile unit are yarn and chemicals. It is
expected that, the proposed textile units would be manufacturing cotton (cotton
weaving) and manmade (rayon or polyester).
TABLE-2.4
RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENT & SOURCE
Quantity in Mode of
Activity Raw Material Source
Kg/d transport
Spinning Raw cotton, Wool, 11,740 Coimbatore, Erode, By closed
manmade fibre Guntur, Tiruchengode, trucks
Mumbai
Weaving Cotton yarn, 7,298 Coimbatore, Erode,
manmade yarn, Rajapalayam, Salem,
silk yarn, wool yarn Mumbai
Garmenting Fabrics (grey and 10,621 Coimbatore, Erode,
dyed) Salem
Dyeing Acid dyes, basic 8,000 Coimbatore, Erode,
dyes Bangalore, Mumbai
The Project will be developed in phased manner. The peak water demand during
the construction phase will be about 20-m3 /day. The water requirement for the
construction phase will be met from the private water supply agencies.
The total water requirement for the operation phase of the project has been
estimated as 1,407 KLD which is a one-time requirement and daily make up of
fresh water is 127 KLD. The water requirement will be met from the
The New Tiruppur Area Development Corporation Limited (NTADCL).
About 100% of the process wastewater will be treated and utilized for the
process. The details of water requirement are given in Table-2.5. The water
balance is given in Figure 2.5.
TABLE-2.5
WATER REQUIREMENT
Sr. No Category Quantity in KLD
1 Domestic consumption 97
2 Process
a Dyeing 1,280
b Looming 0.1
c Warping 0.04
d Sizing 30.151
e Secondary warping 0.033
f Garmenting 0.106
Total 1,407
FIGURE-2.4
WATER BALANCE
TABLE-2.6
MANPOWER BREAK-UP
The wastewater generation of the proposed project is about 1,380 KLD which
includes sewage and the effluent. The generated wastewater from process and
domestic will be treated in proposed ETP (1750 KLD) and in STP (275 KLD)
respectively. The wastewater generation is provided in Table-2.7.
TABLE-2.7
WASTEWATER GENERATION (SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT)
Sr. No Category Quantity in KLD
1 Sewage 92
2 Process
a Dyeing 1258.2
d Sizing 30.09
Total 1380.3
The treated wastewater of 1250-KLD from ETP will be utilized again for process
and cleaning purposes. Treated water from STP of about 92 KLD will be used for
sizing, warping & nourishing greenbelt maintenance.
The Effluent Treatment Plant was designed for treating the effluent from all
dyeing units to the levels of Zero Discharge Units. The proposed ETP scheme is
provided in Figure-2.5.
TABLE-2.8
CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFLUENT
TNPCB
Sr. No Parameters Raw effluent
Standards
1 pH 12 16 5.5 9.0
2 Total suspended solids 850 1250 mg/L 30 mg/L
3 Total dissolved solids 8000 12000 mg/L 2100 mg/L
4 Biochemical oxygen demand 250 350 mg/L 30 mg/L
5 Chemical oxygen demand 600 800 mg/L 250 mg/L
6 Chlorides 300 600 mg/L 1000 mg/L
7 Sulphates 550 850 mg/L 1000 mg/L
8 Oil and grease 0 5 mg/L 10 mg/L
TABLE-2.9
COMPONENTS OF ETP
Sr. No Name of the unit Quantity MOC Size in m
1 Bar screen 1 No. RCC 7.0 x 5.0 x 3.0
2 Grid chamber 1 No. RCC 7.0 x 5.0 x 3.0
3 Equalization sump 2 Nos. RCC 30.0 x 10.0 x 3.0
4 Neutralization sump 1 No. RCC 20.0 x 10.0 x 2.5
5 Chemical tanks 2 No. RCC 5.0 x 4.0 x 3.0
6 Primary clarifier 3 No. RCC 15.0 x 12.0 x 3.0 (5.0)
7 SBR treatment tank 1 No. RCC 25.0 x 20.0 x 2.5 (4.0)
8 Secondary clarifier 1 No. RCC 10.0 x 10.0 x 3.0 (5.0)
9 Filter feed pump 1 No. RCC 25.0 x 20.0 x 2.0
10 Treated water sump 1 No. RCC 25.0 x 20.0 x 2.0
11 Sludge digester 4 No. RCC 15.0 x 10.0 x 3.0
FIGURE-2.5
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PROPOSED EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT
TABLE-2.10
CHARACTERISTICS OF TREATED EFFLUENT (SAND & CARBON FILTERS)
Sr. No Parameters Treated effluent TNPCB Standards
1 pH 78 5.5 9.0
2 Total suspended solids < 10 mg/L 100
3 BOD < 10 mg/L 30
4 COD < 80 mg/L 250
5 Oil and grease < 1 mg/L 10
The Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) having capacity of 275 KLD is proposed to
treat the wastewater generated from the proposed project. The schematic
diagram of STP is given in Figure-2.6. The proposed STP is based on Sequential
Batch Reactor. Characteristics of the raw and treated sewage, components of STP
are provided in Table-2.11 and Table-2.12.
TABLE-2.11
CHARACTERISTICS OF RAW & TREATED SEWAGE
Raw Treated
Sr. No. Parameters
Sewage Sewage
1 pH 6.5 7.5 6.5 7.5
2 Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 150 350 <30
3 Bio-Chemical Oxygen Demand 350 450 <20
(mg/l)
4 Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l) 650 - 800 <200
TABLE-2.12
COMPONENTS OF STP
No of
Sr. No Name of the treatment Dimensions in m
units
Details of proposed STP 275 KLD capacity
1 Collection tank 1 7.5 m x 7.5 m x 3.6 m
2 Upflow Anaerobic Sludge 1 7.5 m x 7.5 m x 6.6 m
Blanket Reactor (UASBR 4)
3 Sequential Batch Reactor - 1 10 m x 7.5 m x 4.6 m
Aeration Zone (SBR AZ 5)
4 Sequential batch reactor 1 4.5 m x 7.5 m x 3.3 m
settling zone
5 Sludge Tank 1 4.5 m x 7.5 m x 2 m
6 Filter Feed Sump 1 4.5 m x 7.5 m x 3.3 m
(FFS-5)
FIGURE-2.6
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
Gaseous emissions
In the proposed project, the major sources of air pollution is the emissions from
DG sets. The DG sets are provided with acoustic enclosure & stack of adequate
height for wide dispersion of pollutants. The anticipated emission characteristics
of DG sets are provided in Table-2.13.
TABLE-2.13
ANTICIPATED AIR EMISSIONS
The first flush shall be checked from entering collection system, using diversion
valves to ensure that runoff from the first spell of rain is flushed out and does not
enter the system. This needs to be done since the first spell of rain carries a
relatively larger amount of pollutants from the air and catchment surface.
Rainwater from paved and roof areas will be collected through rainwater
collection mechanism and stored in UG tanks and utilized within the project
area.
The rainwater from landscaped and greenbelt area within project premises will
be harvested to ground through rainwater recharge pits.
The rainwater from paved areas within project premises will be harvested to
ground through rainwater harvesting pond.
Run off from the proposed project site is calculated using rational formula:
Q=CxIxA
Where,
Q= Run-off (m3/hr)
A= Catchment Area
C= Coefficient of Run-off
I= Intensity of rainfall = 100 mm/hr (assumed) = 0.10 m/hr
TABLE-2.14
RAINWATER HARVESTING
Harvestable
water
Sr. Area Impermeability (Intensity x
Category
No (Sq.m) factor Area x Imp.
Factor)
KL/hr
1 Roof areas
a) Industrial plots 217000 0.7 15190
b) Solar power plant 53000 0.7 3710
c) Warehouses 100000 0.7 7000
d) ETP, STP, SW Storage 15000 0.7 1050
areas
2 Greenbelt area & Vacant 5,30,000 0.3 15,900
area
3 Road/ Surface parking area 60,000 0.9 5,400
Total 9,75,000 48250
Considering the constant co-efficient factor of 0.80 (for all situations) for
evaporation, spillage and first flush wastage (Source: CPWD)
Thus,
The management measures has been proposed and provided on the next page
TABLE-2.15
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT MEASURES
Harvestable
Harvestable quantity
water after
Sr. Area (Intensity x considering
Category Management
No (Sq.m) Area x Imp. spillage,
Factor) evaporation
KL/hr & first flush
KL/hr
1 Roof areas
a) Industrial 2,17,000 15,190 12,192
plots Stored in UG
b) Solar power 53,000 3,710 2,968 tanks of
plant 42 Nos x
c) Warehouses 1,00,000 7,000 5,600 600 KL
d) ETP, STP, SW 15,000 1,050 840
Storage areas
2 Greenbelt & 5,30,000 15,900 12,720 Routed to 708
open area rainwater
harvesting
pits
3 Road/ Surface 60,000 5,400 4,320 Routed to
parking area rainwater
harvesting
pond with the
capacity of
7.5 MLD
Total 9,75,000 48250
TABLE-2.16
MANAGEMENT FOR COVERED STRUCTURES (ROOF TOPS)
Sr. UG Tank nos.
Description Quantity KL/hr
No (600 KL)
1 Industrial plots 12152 26
2 Solar power plant 2968 5
3 Warehouses 5600 9
4 ETP, STP, SW Storage areas 840 2
The run-off from the covered areas shall be separately piped to an underground
collection tanks of capacity 600 KL at various locations, after duly filtering the
same. This water is proposed to use as domestic water after necessary treatment.
The calculated peak run-off from greenbelt and open areas is 67.42 m3/hr. This
run-off is proposed to be channelised through storm water drains to individual
recharge pits and the rainwater will be re-charged into underground aquifers.
3
Quantity of Runoff 12720 -m /hr
Total No of Storage Pits required - (12720/8.8) * (1 - 0.40) = 722.7
~730 nos.
About 723 no of recharge pits will be provided all along the periphery for
harvesting rainwater run-off.
The runoff from parking and paved area of quantity 4320 KL/hr will be collected
and routed to rainwater harvesting pond. The pond has the holding capacity of
7.5 MLD. The pond have the capacity to hold water from the proposed textile SEZ
and from thermal power plant
TABLE-2.17
STORM RUNOFF MANAGEMENT FOR PAVED AREAS
Sr. No Description Quantity KL/hr
1 From Thermal power plant to Pond 2072
2 From Textile SEZ to pond 4320
Total 6392
Hence the rainwater harvesting pond of 7.5 MLD is sufficient to store runoff
6.4 MLD from the infrastructures.
The various types of solid waste will be generated from the various units
Hazardous waste will be generated from CETP, MEE. The generated hazardous
wastes will be given to Secured disposal centre.
Municipal solid waste generated from the proposed project will be segregated into
biodegradable, non-biodegradable and appropriate actions will be taken.
Biodegradable wastes will be composted using Organic waste converter
TABLE-2.18
SOLID WASTE GENERATION
The proposed structure is a Textile Park Special Economical Zone (SEZ) area used
for utilities, internal roads, walk ways, common open space, water bodies,
landscaped garden area etc.
Adequate land will be available for open spaces and other non-building purposes.
About 33.2 ha (34.1 %) area will be reserved for green belt & green cover in the
proposed facility. Suitable plant species of local varieties will be planted with
adequate spacing and density for their fast growth and survival. The
greenbelt/landscaping plan is shown in Figure-2.7.
Chapter 2
Project Description
FIGURE-2.7
GREENBELT/LANDSCAPING LAYOUT
3.1 Introduction
This chapter illustrates the description of the existing environmental status of the
study area with reference to the prominent environmental attributes. The study
area covers the area falling within 10 km radius from the center of the proposed
project site.
This report incorporates the baseline data generated through primary surveys for
three months from 1st June 2016 to 31st August 2016.
3.1.1 Methodology
The sampling locations have been selected on the basis of the following:
Assess the positive and negative impacts due to the proposed project; and
Suggest appropriate mitigation measures for negating the adverse
environmental impacts, if any; and
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Felsites and porphyry dykes
Charnockites
Norite dykes
Hornblendic dykes
Peninsular gneiss
-------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------
Middle Dharwars---Basic and ultrabasic intrusives with iron stone, Limestones etc.
Although the sediments of the Middle Dharwars were altered due to regional
metamorphism the limestone remained as remnants undergoing recrystallisation
and thus are interbedded with Calc-granulites and garnetiferous gneiss and have
been subjected to structural disturbances.
The area has huge deposits of Limestone. The crystalline limestone deposits of
Tamilnadu occurring in and around Tirunelveli, Ramanathaparam, Madurai,
Coimbatore, Salem and North Arcot District are associated with Calc-granulate,
Calc Silicate and Calciphyre. It shows a concordant association with Calc silicate
in Sankaridurg area and Quartzities in southern Tamilnadu. Country rock is
garnetiferous sillimanite schist in most of the places, at places the limestone also
occurs in association with Charnockite and Calc gneiss.
Surface Water
Noyyal River is at a distance of about 8.5 Km South direction from the proposed
site and Cauvery River is at a distance of more than 25 Km away from the
proposed site. Most of the nallahs in the study area except during monsoon they
remain completely dry.
Groundwater
The study area experiences shortage for water resources. Even the annual rainfall
is very less and is vagrant. Water catchment tanks in the area are only seasonal
and they remain dry during most of the seasons. As perennial water resources
are remote, the agricultural activities in this area are mainly dependent upon the
rainfall, where the average is only about 574.3 mm per year. Studies show that
almost 90% of the available groundwater resources in the district have already
been tapped for drinking, irrigation and industrial uses and there is immediate
necessity for improving the groundwater recharge conditions for this area.
The groundwater in the area in general occurs under phreatic conditions, in the
weathered mantle rocks under semi-confined conditions and in the fractured
zones. Generally the aquifers in the formations are heterogeneous in nature.
These rocks are devoid of primary porosity, but are rendered porous and
permeable with the development of secondary openings by fracturing and
weathering and their inter connections. The shallow aquifers in the major part of
the district occur within the depth of 30 m, while in the other parts it is more than
30 m. Here the groundwater is developed by means of dug wells and bore wells
and the groundwater occurs in phreatic conditions in shallow aquifers, which
occurs to depth ranging 35 to 60 m. The hydrographics prepared for this area by
the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), reveals that the rainfall is the principal
source of recharge for groundwater and the water level fluctuations are in
response to recharge for groundwater. Raise in water table takes place mainly
during July - August and October - November, coinciding with southwest
monsoon and northeast monsoon periods. A raise in water table is more
pronounced during southwest monsoon period. But the main rainfall for the
district is northeast monsoon, which forms the main recharge to groundwater.
3.3 Meteorology
The meteorological data recorded during the study period is very useful for proper
interpretation of the baseline information as well as for input to prediction models
for air quality dispersion. Historical data on meteorological parameters will also
play an important role in identifying general meteorological regime of the region.
The meteorological parameters were recorded at site on hourly basis during the
study period and consists of parameters like wind speed, wind direction and
temperature. The total rainfall was recorded daily once at 0830 hrs. The
maximum and minimum values for temperature, relative humidity, rainfall are
presented in Table-3.1.
TABLE-3.1
SUMMARY OF THE METEOROLOGICAL DATA GENERATED AT SITE
Month Temperature (0C) Relative Humidity (%) Rainfall
Max Min Max Min (mm)
June 2016 35 25 94 32 2.03
July 2016 34 24 94 26 --
August 2016 34 23 94 27 --
The summary of the wind pattern for the above mentioned period is given in
Table-3.2 and graphical presentation of the same is shown in Figure-3.1.
TABLE-3.2
SUMMARY OF WIND PATTERN IN STUDY AREA
First Second Predominant
Calm
Season Predominant Predominant Wind Speed
(%)
Wind Direction Wind Direction (kmph)
June August 2016 SW (41.6%) SSW (16.6%) 3.6 5.7 8.33
NORTH
45%
36% 45%
27% 36%
27%
18%
18%
9%
9%
EAST
WEST EAST
WIND SPEED
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
(m/s)
>= 11.1
SOUTH >= 11.1
SOUTH 8.8 - 11.1
8.8 - 11.1 5.7 - 8.8
5.7 - 8.8 3.6 - 5.7
FIGURE-3.1
SITE SPECIFIC WINDROSE 1ST JUNE 2016 31ST AUGUST 2016
Start Date: 2016-06-30 - 00:00
VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore
End Date: 2016-06-30 - 23:00 41
The wind speed and direction data of IMD, Coimbatore station has been obtained
for the past available 10 years. The data for the remaining parameters has been
collected for 10 years and processed. Data on Cloud cover is compiled from the
climatological tables for the IMD station at Coimbatore. The monthly data for all
the parameters except wind speed and wind direction is presented in Table-3.3.
TABLE-3.3
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION: IMD, COIMBATORE
Month Atmospheric Temperature Relative Humidity Rainfall
Pressure (hPa) (0C) (%) (mm)
0830 1730 Max. Min. 0830 1730 Monthly
Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Total
January 999.5 995.6 32.2 19.9 76 51 10.4
February 998.6 994.2 35.0 20.7 75 42 5.3
March 997.4 992.7 37.5 22.5 73 38 13.3
April 995.3 990.7 38.9 24.9 71 46 44.3
May 992.6 988.8 39.9 25.9 63 48 55.1
June 992.3 989.0 39.0 25.8 59 48 48.5
July 992.4 989.3 38.0 25.5 60 51 57.6
August 992.9 989.4 37.8 25.1 62 52 85.5
September 994.0 990.1 36.9 24.3 66 55 108.8
October 995.8 992.1 35.5 23.4 76 65 189.9
November 997.3 993.8 32.8 22.4 79 69 153.1
December 998.7 995.2 31.5 21.0 78 64 63.5
Source: Indian Meteorological department, Pune
Generally, light to moderate winds prevail throughout the year. Winds were light
and moderate particularly during the morning hours. While during the afternoon
hours the winds were stronger. The seasonal and annual wind roses are shown in
Figure-3.2 and Figure-3.3 and presented in Table-3.4.
3.3.2.3 Comments
The India Meteorological Department (IMD) records the data two times a day viz.
0830 hr and 1730 hr, while the site-specific data has been recorded at an hourly
interval. On comparison of site-specific data generated for study period vis--vis
the IMD data, slight variations were found. The following observations are brought
out:
TABLE-3.4
SUMMARY OF WIND PATTERN: IMD, COIMBATORE
Wind Direction Wind Speed Frequency (%)
S. No.
8.30 hrs 17.30 hrs 8.30 hrs 17.30 hrs
1 Pre-monsoon season
NE E 25.6 26.1
N SE 18.9 22.6
2 Monsoon season
NW W 26.3 42.5
W SE 18.0 8.8
3 Post monsoon season
N NE 30.8 31.4
NE, NNW SE 16.2 each 12.4
4 Winter season
N NE 34.3 49.0
NNE ENE 23.1 20.1
5 Annual
N NE 20.8 21.1
NE W 14.9 15.9
The maximum and minimum temperatures recorded at the site during study
period were 350C and 23oC.
The maximum and minimum Relative Humidity recorded at the during study
period were 94% and 27%.
%
3.7
E2
NN
1.0
5.
N 1.0%
3%
%N
0%
N
2.
W
NW
E
1.0 N
%W .0%
NW E1
EN
1.7% W C-5.7% E 0.3%
ES
E0
SW .3%
%W
2.0
4.0% S
SS
E5
SE
SW
.7%
12
.0
%
%
.3
13
08-30hrs
SW
.0%
S
0%
E6
20.
NN
1 .0
N 2.0%
%N
1.
7%
NW
0%
0.
E .7%
N
N E3
W
EN
ES
E4
W SW .0%
5 .0%
SW
SS
0%
SE
E3
4.
6.
.0%
7.
0%
15.7% S
S SW
7%
17-30hrs
20.
SCALE 4%
SPEED CALM
1 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr
.5%
0%
N 0%
E0
NN
0.
3%
NN
3%
0.
1.0
%W
E
N
%
E0
N
W
NW
EN
0% W C-5.0% E 0.3%
ES
E0
SW %
%W
4.0
SS
2.8% S
SE
E2
6.
.3%
3%
08-30hrs
SW
%
.0%
.3
0%
N 0.3%
34
E1
NN
0.
NN
3%
0%
W
0%
N
E
%
E0
N
W
WN
W EN
14.7% W C-1.5% E 0.8%
ES
E0
W
%
SW
SE
SS
%W
4.0
0.
9%
8%
42.
SW
0%
9.
11.0% S
SS
E1
6.3
%
17-30hrs
SCALE 4%
W
SPEED CALM
SS
3%
1 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr
40.
FIGURE-3.2 (B)
WINDROSE DIAGRAM OF MONSOON SEASON (IMD- COIMBATORE)
%
8.0
E2
NN
N 6.0%
7.
5%
1.0
N
%N
5%
W
3.
NW
E
1 .5 N
%W .0%
E3
NW EN
SE
SW
.0%
7.
5 %
5%
7.
W
08-30hrs
SS
%
0.0
0%
E1
13.
NN
N 5.5%
0%
1.
2.
5%
.0%
E E7
N
N EN
W
SW
3.
E2
0%
%
.0
.0%
5
12.0% S
W
SS
0%
15.
17-30hrs
SCALE 4%
SPEED CALM
1 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr
FIGURE-3.2 (C)
WINDROSE DIAGRAM OF POST MONSOON SEASON (IMD- COIMBATORE)
%
4.7
E5
NN
4%
7.
N 4.0%
3%
9.
1.3
%
E
N
0.0
N
W
%N
E2
NW
.0%
NN
2.0 E6
%W EN
NW
SS
SW
2.
0% S
N 3.7%
0%
0%
E1
%S
1.
0%
.3 %
1.0
1.
0%
NN
0%
N .0%
1.
W
0% W E5
E
EN
N
08-30hrs WN
W
1.7% W C-18.5% E 28.0%
W ES
WS E2
.0%
0%
SW
0%
SW
SS
2.7% S
1.
E3
%S
SE
.0 %
9.
2 .7
7%
17-30hrs
SCALE 4%
SPEED CALM
1 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr
FIGURE-3.2 (D)
WINDROSE DIAGRAM OF WINTER SEASON (IMD- COIMBATORE)
%
6.6
E2
NN
N 2.7%
0.8
5.
1%
8%
%N
3.
N
W
E
NW
N
1.8 .1%
%W
E3
NW EN
SE
E2
7.
.8%
0%
SW
%
.9
13
.3%
08-30hrs
E9
W
SS
NN
6%
N 3.2%
18.
0.3
%N W
9%
0.
0.
9%
NW
E .0%
0% E4
N
WN N EN
W
6.9% W C-12.4% E 13.0%
ES
SW E1
.5%
%W
2.3
SW
SE
5.
%
.7
1%
SS
4
E6
.1%
10.4% S
W
SS
17-30hrs
0%
19.
SCALE 4%
SPEED CALM
1 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr
FIGURE-3.3
ANNUAL WINDROSE DIAGRAM (IMD - COIMBATORE)
It is essential to determine the potentiality of soil in the area and to identify the
impacts of urbanization on soil quality. Accordingly, the soil quality assessment
has been carried out.
The sampling locations have been identified with the following objectives:
For studying soil characteristics of the region, soil sampling locations were
selected to assess the existing soil conditions in and around the project area
representing various land use types. The physical, chemical and heavy metal
concentrations were determined. The samples were collected using ramming a
core cutter into the soil up to a depth of 90 cm.
The present study on the soil profile establishes the baseline characteristics. Six
soil samples were collected from the study area. At each location, soil samples
were collected from three different depths viz. 30 cm, 60 cm and 90 cm below
the surface and homogenized. The homogenized samples were analyzed for
physical and chemical characteristics.
The details of the soil sampling locations in the study area are given in Table-3.5
and shown in Figure-3.4.
TABLE-3.5
DETAILS OF SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
The soil characteristics are shown in Table-3.6. The results are compared with
standard soil classification given in Table-3.7.
TABLE-3.6
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
Parameters S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
pH (1:2.5 soil water extract) 7.3 7.5 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.5
Electrical Conductivity (s/cm)
(1:5 soil water extract) 365 168 167 246 324 361
Texture Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy
Loam Loam Clay Loam Loam Loam
Sand (%) 59 62 61 49 51 64
Silt (%) 28 20 23 41 33 13
Clay (%) 13 18 16 10 16 23
Bulk Density (gm/cc) 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4
Porosity (%) 34 20.3 26.8 34.4 36.2 41.6
Organic matter (%) 1.2 1.8 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.4
Exchangeable Calcium as Ca (mg/kg) 354 194 218 300 357 356
Exchangeable Magnesium as Mg (mg/kg) 70 185 172 100 113 129
Exchangeable Sodium as Na (mg/kg) 52.5 51.5 61.2 83 83 79.3
Available Potassium as K (kg/ha) 305 246 324 185 210 267
Available Phosphorus as P2O5 (kg/ha) 9.5 12.5 11.4 10.3 12.9 13.4
Available Nitrogen as N (kg/ha) 154 146 151 148 154 165
Sulphates as SO4 (mg/kg) 135 109 110 122 148 138
Chlorides as Cl (mg/kg) 160 165 150 166 189 178
It has been observed that the texture of soil is mostly Sandy Loam in the study
area. The common color of the soil is light brown. It has been observed that the
pH of the soil quality ranged from 7.3 7.7, indicating that the soil is usually
neutral to slightly alkaline in nature. The bulk density of soil ranges in between
1.2 1.5.
The Electrical Conductivity was observed to be in the range of 167 - 361 S/cm,
with the maximum (361) observed in the Chengapalli (S6) and with the minimum
(167) observed in Samiarpalayam (S3).
The Organic matter ranged between 0.9-1.8 percent. The maximum Percentage
(1.8%) was found to be in the village of Tenmugam Kangeyampalayam (S2)
indicating that the organic carbon is having more than sufficient Percentage. The
minimum Percentage (0.9%) was observed in Sottakavundanpalayam (S4)
indicating that the organic carbon has Sufficient Percentage.
The Nitrogen values ranged between 149-165 kg/ha. The maximum value (165)
was found to be in the village of Chengapalli (S6) indicating that the soil is having
Good quantity of Nitrogen. The minimum value (149) was observed in
Aruvangattupalayam (S2) indicating that the soil has Good quantity of Nitrogen.
S2 Aruvangattupalayam S3 Samiarpalayam
S1 S4 Sottakavundampalayam
project
site
S7 Chengapalli
S6 kasturipalayam
FIGURE-3.4
SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
The Phosphorus values range in between 9.5 13.4 kg/ha. The maximum value
(13.4) was found in the chengapalli (S6) and the minimum value (9.5) was
observed in the proposed project site (S1) indicating that the soil has very less
quantity of Phosphorus.
The Potassium values range in between 185 - 305 kg/ha. The maximum value
(13.4) was found in the proposed project site (S1) and the minimum value (9.5)
was observed in sottakavundamapalayam (S4) indicating that the soils in the
area have medium quantity of Potassium.
TABLE-3.7
STANDARD SOIL CLASSIFICATION
Sr. No. Soil Test Classification
1 pH <4.5 Extremely acidic
4.51- 5.50 Very strongly acidic
5.51-6.0 moderately acidic
6.01-6.50 slightly acidic
6.51-7.30 Neutral
7.31-7.80 slightly alkaline
7.81-8.50 moderately alkaline
8.51-9.0 strongly alkaline
9.01 very strongly alkaline
2 Salinity Electrical Conductivity Upto 1.00 Average
(mmhos/cm) 1.01-2.00 harmful to germination
(1 ppm = 640 mmho/cm) 2.01-3.00 harmful to crops (sensitive
to salts)
3 Organic Carbon Upto 0.2: very less
0.21-0.4: less
0.41-0.5 medium,
0.51-0.8: on an average sufficient
0.81-1.00: sufficient
>1.0 more than sufficient
4 Nitrogen (Kg/ha) Upto 50 very less
51-100 less
101-150 good
151-300 Better
>300 sufficient
5 Phosphorus (Kg/ha) Upto 15 very less
16-30 less
31-50 medium,
51-65 on an average sufficient
66-80 sufficient
>80 more than sufficient
6 Potash (Kg/ha) 0 -120 very less
120-180 less
181-240 medium
241-300 average
301-360 better
>360 more than sufficient
Source: Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR, New Delhi
The ambient air quality with respect to the study zone of 10-km radius around the
project site forms the baseline information. The various sources of air pollution in
the region are industries and vehicular traffic. The prime objective of the baseline
air quality study was to assess the existing air quality of the area. The study area
represents mostly rural environment.
This section describes the selection of sampling locations, methodology adopted for
sampling, analytical techniques and frequency of sampling. The results of
monitoring carried out for study period from 1st June 2016 to 31st August 2016 are
presented in Annexure-VII.
The baseline status of the ambient air quality has been assessed through a
scientifically designed ambient air quality-monitoring network. The design of
monitoring network in the air quality surveillance program has been based on the
following considerations:
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQ) stations were set up at Eight locations with
due consideration to the above mentioned points. Table-3.8 gives the details of
environmental setting around each monitoring station. The location of the selected
stations with reference to the project site is given in the same table and shown in
Figure-3.5.1.
TABLE-3.8
AIR QUALITY MONITORING LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
Distance Direction
Code Name of the location w.r.t project w.r.t project
site (km) site
AAQ1 Project Site --- ---
AAQ2 Aruvangattupalayam 1.7 NNW
AAQ3 Samiarpalayam 1.8 NNE
AAQ4 Sottakavundampalayam 1.8 ENE
AAQ5 Chamrajpalayam 1.6 ESE
AAQ6 Tenmugamkangeyampalayam 1.5 South
AAQ7 Chengapalli 2.0 SW
AAQ8 Virumandapalayam 1.9 WNW
Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out with a frequency of two days
per week at all locations for study period from 1st June 2016 to 31st August 2016.
The baseline data of air environment is generated for the following parameters:
TABLE-3.9
MONITORED PARAMETERS AND FREQUENCY OF SAMPLING
The air samples were analyzed as per standard methods specified by Central
Pollution Control Board (CPCB), IS: 5184 and American Public Health Association
(APHA).
Fine Particulate Samplers APM-550 instruments have been used for monitoring
Particulate Matter size less than 10 m (PM10), Particulate Matter size less than 2.5-
m (PM2.5) and for gaseous pollutants like SO2 and NO2 APM-460BL has been used
along with APM-550.
The make and model of the instruments used for analysis of the samples collected
during the field monitoring are given in Table-3.10
TABLE-3.10
INSTRUMENTS USED FOR ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES
The techniques used for ambient air quality monitoring and minimum detectable
levels are given in Table-3.11.
AAQ4 Sottakavundampalayam
AAQ8 Virumandapalayam AAQ1
project
site
AAQ5 Chamrajapalayam
AAQ7 Chengapalli
AAQ6 Tenmugamkangeyampalayam
FIGURE-3.5
AIR QUALITY SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
TABLE-3.11
TECHNIQUES USED FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING
Minimum
Sr. No Parameter Technique Detectable
Limit
1 PM10 Respirable Dust Sampling / High 5.0 g/m3
Volume Sampling (Gravimetric
Method)
2 PM2.5 FRM Method/ Low Volume Sampling 2.0 g/m3
(Gravimetric Method)
3 Sulphur dioxide Modified West and Gaeke Method 4.0 g/m3
(SO2)
4 Nitrogen di-oxide Sodium Arsenite Method 9.0 g/m3
(NO2)
5 Carbon monoxide Adsorption and Extraction followed 0.0125
(CO) by GC-MS Analysis mg/m3
6 Ozone (O3) Spectrophotometric Method 2.0 g/m3
7 Ammonia (NH3) Indo-Phenol Blue Method 20.0 g/m3
8 Benzene (C6H6) Adsorption and desorption followed 1 ng/m3
by GC-MS analysis
9 BaP Solvent Extraction followed by GC- 1 ng/m3
Benzo(a)pyrene MS
10 Arsenic (As) ICP-MS Method after sampling on
0.2 ng/m3
EPM Filter Paper
11 Nickel (Ni) ICP-MS Method after sampling on
0.10 ng/m3
EPM Filter Paper
12 Lead (Pb) ICP-MS Method after sampling on
0.05 g/m3
EPM Filter Paper
The survey results for the period of three months are presented in detail in
Annexure-III.
TABLE-3.12
SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS
Note: Ozone (O3), Ammonia (NH3), Lead (Pb), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni), Benzene (C6H6) and
Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) are found to exist
PM10: The maximum and minimum concentrations for PM10 were recorded as
49.5 g/m3 and 32.4 g/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was
recorded Samiarpalayam (AAQ3) and the minimum concentration was recorded at
Virumandapalayam (AAQ8). The average concentrations were ranged between 34.9
and 44.5 g/m3.
PM2.5: The maximum and minimum concentrations for PM2.5 were recorded as
17.2 g/m3 and 5.9 g/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded
Samiarpalayam (AAQ3) and the minimum concentration was recorded at
Virumandapalayam (AAQ8). The average values were observed to be in the range
of 11.5 and 16.2 g/m3.
SO2: The maximum and minimum SO2 concentrations were recorded as 11.6 g/m3
and 6.0 g/m3. The maximum concentration was recorded at Samiarpalayam
(AAQ3) and the minimum concentration was recorded at Chengapalli (AAQ7). The
average values were observed to be in the range of 7.1 and 9.7 g/m3.
TABLE-3.13
LEVEL OF POLLUTANTS AND THEIR LOCATIONS
The concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX and CO are observed to be well within
the standards prescribed by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for Industrial,
Rural, Residential and Other area.
The Concentration of Ozone (O3), Ammonia (NH3), Lead (Pb), Arsenic (As) ng/m3,
Nickel (Ni) ng/m3, Benzene (C6H6) and Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m3 are Below
the Detectable Limit.
Selected water quality parameters of ground water and surface water resources
within the study area has been studied for assessing the water environment and
evaluate anticipated impact of the proposed project. Understanding the water
quality is essential in preparation of environmental impact assessment and to
identify critical issues with a view to suggest appropriate mitigation measures for
implementation.
The information required has been collected through primary surveys and
secondary sources.
3.6.1 Methodology
Drainage pattern;
Location of residential areas representing different activities/likely impact
areas; and
Likely areas, which can represent baseline conditions.
Water sources covering 10-km radial distance were examined for physico-chemical,
heavy metals and bacteriological parameters in order to assess the effect of
industrial and other activities on water. The samples were collected and analyzed
as per the procedures specified in 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and wastewater' published by American Public Health Association (APHA).
Water samples were collected from Six (6) ground water and two (2) surface
water-sampling locations. These samples were taken as grab samples and were
analyzed for various parameters to be compared with the standards for drinking
water as per IS: 10500. The details of water sampling locations in the study area
are listed below in Table-3.14 and are depicted in Figure-3.6.
TABLE-3.14
WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
Distance w.r.t. Direction w.r.t.
Code Location
Project Site (km) Project Site
Ground Water
GW1 Project Site --- ---
GW2 Aruvangattupalayam 1.7 NNW
GW3 Samiarpalayam 1.8 NNE
GW4 Sottakavundampalayam 1.8 ENE
GW5 Kasturipalayam 1.2 ESE
GW6 Chengapalli 1.5 SW
Surface Water
SW1 Noyyal River 9.0 South
SW2 Palatholuvu Tank 8.7 SE
FIGURE-3.6
WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
TABLE 3.15a
GROUND WATER QUALITY
Desirable limit
S. No. Parameters Unit GW1 GW2 GW3
As per IS: 10500
1 pH - 6.5-8.5 (NR) 7.6 7.7 7.8
2 Colour Hazen 5 (25) 1 1 2
3 Taste - Agreeable Agree Agree Agree
4 Odour - U.O. U.O. U.O. U.O.
5 Conductivity mS/cm $ 506 876 514
6 Turbidity NTU 5 (10) 2 2 2
7 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 500 (2000) 859 932 864
8 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 300 (600) 421 457 423
9 Total Alkalinity mg/l 200 (600) 257.7 279.6 259
10 Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 (200) 49 72 304
11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 (100) 9.8 14.4 60.8
12 Residual Chlorine mg/ 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
13 Boron mg/l 1 0.5 0.6 0.4
14 Chlorides as Cl mg/l 250 (1000) 42.1 45.7 42.3
15 Sulphates as SO4 mg/l 200 (400) 4.0 2.1 2.4
16 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.0 (1.5) 0.2 0.1 0.1
17 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 45 (NR) 12.3 16.4 18.2
18 Sodium as Na mg/l $ 117.0 276.0 378.0
19 Potassium as K mg/l $ 15.2 35.9 49.1
20 Phenolic Compounds mg/l 0.001 (0.002) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
21 Cyanides mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
22 Anionic Detergents mg/l 0.2 (1.0) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
23 Mineral Oil mg/l 0.01 (0.03) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
24 Cadmium as Cd mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
25 Arsenic as as mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.05 (1.5) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
27 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
28 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.1 (0.3) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
29 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.3 (1.0) 0.04 0.06 0.05
30 Chromium as Cr6+ mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
31 Selenium as Se mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
32 Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 (15) 0.04 0.06 0.08
33 Aluminium as Al mg/l 0.03 (0.2) 0.04 0.05 0.01
34 Mercury as Hg mg/l 0.001 (NR) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
35 Pesticides mg/l Absent Absent Absent Absent
36 E.Coli - Absent Absent Absent Absent
MPN/
37 Total coliforms 10 Nil Nil Nil
100 ml
U.O.: Un-objectionable $: Not specified (): Permissible limit in the absence of alternate source
TABLE 3.15b
GROUND WATER QUALITY
Desirable Limit
S. No. Parameters Unit GW1 GW2 GW3
As per IS: 10500
1 pH - 6.5-8.5 (NR) 7.6 7.8 7.6
2 Colour Hazen 5 (25) 2 2 2
3 Taste - Agreeable Agree Agree Agree
4 Odour - U.O. U.O. U.O. U.O.
5 Conductivity mS/cm $ 462 420 871
6 Turbidity NTU 5 (10) 2 3 3
7 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 500 (2000) 741 760 976
8 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 300 (600) 363 372 478
9 Total Alkalinity mg/l 200 (600) 222 228 293
10 Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 (200) 240 215 210
11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 (100) 48 43 42
12 Residual Chlorine mg/ 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
13 Boron mg/l 1 0.8 0.4 0.1
14 Chlorides as Cl mg/l 250 (1000) 36.3 37.2 47.8
15 Sulphates as SO4 mg/l 200 (400) 1.8 2.1 3.9
16 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.0 (1.5) 0.2 0.1 0.2
17 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 45 (NR) 17.4 14.7 15.2
18 Sodium as Na mg/l $ 287.0 241.0 314.0
19 Potassium as K mg/l $ 37.3 31.3 40.8
20 Phenolic Compounds mg/l 0.001 (0.002) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
21 Cyanides mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
22 Anionic Detergents mg/l 0.2 (1.0) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
23 Mineral Oil mg/l 0.01 (0.03) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
24 Cadmium as Cd mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
25 Arsenic as as mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.05 (1.5) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
27 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
28 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.1 (0.3) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
29 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.3 (1.0) 0.06 0.05 0.04
30 Chromium as Cr6+ mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
31 Selenium as Se mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
32 Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 (15) 0.07 0.08 0.07
33 Aluminium as Al mg/l 0.03 (0.2) 0.01 0.02 0.03
34 Mercury as Hg mg/l 0.001 (NR) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
35 Pesticides mg/l Absent Absent Absent Absent
36 E.Coli - Absent Absent Absent Absent
MPN/
37 Total coliforms 10 Nil Nil Nil
100 ml
U.O.: Un-objectionable $: Not specified (): Permissible limit in the absence of alternate source
GW4 : Sottakavundanpalayam
GW5 : Mallankattupudur
GW6 : Samiyarpalayam
The analysis results indicate that the pH ranges in between 7.6 to 7.8, which is well
within the specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5. The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
concentration is found to be ranging in between 741 to 976 mg/l. Total hardness
was observed to be ranging from 363 to 478 mg/l. The Chlorides and Nitrates are
found ranging from 36.3 47.8 mg/l and 12.3 18.2 mg/l. Fluorides found ranging
in between 0.1 to 0.2 mg/l. The Heavy metals are found to be below detectable
limits.
The results of the parameters analyzed for the 2 surface water samples are
presented in Table-3.16
TABLE 3.16
SURFACE WATER QUALITY
Desirable Limit
S. No. Parameters Unit SW1 SW2
As per IS: 10500
1 pH - 6.5-8.5 (NR) 7.8 7.0
2 Colour Hazen 5 (25) 2 2
3 Taste - Agreeable Agree Agree
4 Odour - U.O. U.O. U.O.
5 Conductivity mS/cm $ 124 111
6 Turbidity NTU 5 (10) 4 2
7 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 500 (2000) 1500 345
8 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 300 (600) 735 169
9 Total Alkalinity mg/l 200 (600) 450 104
10 Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 (200) 320 52
11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 (100) 64 10.4
12 Residual Chlorine mg/ 0.2 <0.1 <0.1
13 Boron mg/l 1 0.87 0.87
14 Chlorides as Cl mg/l 250 (1000) 73.5 16.9
15 Sulphates as SO4 mg/l 200 (400) 3 4.8
16 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.0 (1.5) 0.6 0.2
17 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 45 (NR) 42.5 9.3
18 Sodium as Na mg/l $ 970.0 64.2
19 Potassium as K mg/l $ 126.1 12.3
20 Phenolic Compounds mg/l 0.001 (0.002) <0.001 <0.001
21 Cyanides mg/l 0.05 (NR) 0.04 <0.02
22 Anionic Detergents mg/l 0.2 (1.0) <0.1 <0.1
23 Mineral Oil mg/l 0.01 (0.03) 0.52 <0.01
24 Cadmium as Cd mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01
25 Arsenic as as mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01
26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.05 (1.5) <0.01 <0.01
27 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.01 <0.01
28 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.1 (0.3) <0.01 <0.01
29 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.3 (1.0) 0.3 0.07
30 Chromium as Cr6+ mg/l 0.05 (NR) <0.05 <0.05
31 Selenium as Se mg/l 0.01 (NR) <0.01 <0.01
32 Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 (15) 0.08 0.07
33 Aluminium as Al mg/l 0.03 (0.2) 0.01 0.05
34 Mercury as Hg mg/l 0.001 (NR) <0.001 <0.001
35 Pesticides mg/l Absent 0 Absent
36 E.Coli - Absent 0 Absent
37 Total coliforms MPN/100 ml 10 Nil Nil
U.O.: Un-objectionable $: Not specified (): Permissible limit in the absence of alternate source
The analysis results indicate that the pH values are 7.8 and 7.0, which is well
within the specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5. The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
concentrations are found to be 1500 mg/l in Noyyal River and 345 mg/l in
Palatoluvu tank. Total hardness was observed to be 735 mg/l in Noyyal River and
169 mg/l in Palatoluvu tank.
The Chlorides and Nitrates are found ranging from 16.9 73.5 mg/l and 9.3 42.5
mg/l. Fluorides found to be 0.2 to 0.6 mg/l. The Heavy metals are found to be
below detectable limits.
The environmental impact of noise can have several effects varying from Noise
Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) to annoyance depending on loudness of noise. The
environmental impact assessment of noise due to construction activity, and
vehicular traffic can be undertaken by taking into consideration various factors like
potential damage to hearing, physiological responses, annoyance and general
community responses. Noise monitoring has been undertaken for 24-hr duration at
each location.
N2 Aruvangattupalayam N3 Samiarpalayam
N6 Kasturipalayam
N8 Chengapalli
N7 Tenmugam
kangeyampalayam
FIGURE-3.7
NOISE SURVEY LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
TABLE-3.17
NOISE SURVEY LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
Distance Direction
Location w.r.t w.r.t
Location Zone
Code Project Project
Site (km) Site
N1 Project site --- --- Rural
N2 Aruvangattupalayam 1.7 NW Rural
N3 Samiarpalayam 1.8 NNE Rural
N4 Sottakavundampalayam 1.8 ENE Rural
N5 Chamrajpalayam 1.6 ESE Rural
N6 Kasturipalayam 1.2 ESE Rural
N7 Tenmugam 1.5 South Rural
Kangeyampalayam
N8 Chengapalli 2.0 SW Commercial
N9 Virumandapalayam 1.9 WNW Rural
N10 Periyakkapalayam 2.0 NW Rural
Sound Pressure Level (SPL) measurements were measured at all locations; one
reading for every hour was taken for 24 hours. The day noise levels have been
monitored during 6 am to 10 pm and night levels during 10 pm to 6 am at all the
monitoring locations within the study area.
For noise levels measured over a given period of time interval, it is possible to
describe important features of noise using statistical quantities. This is calculated
using the percent of the time certain noise levels are exceeding the time interval.
The notation for the statistical quantities of noise levels are described below:
The Leq is the equivalent continuous sound level which is equivalent to the same
sound energy as the actual fluctuating sound measured in the same period. This is
necessary because sound from noise source often fluctuates widely during a given
period of time.
(L10 - L90)2
Leq = L50 + ------------
60
Lday is defined as the equivalent noise level measured over a period of time during
day (6 am to 10 pm).
Lnight is defined as the equivalent noise level measured over a period of time during
night (10 pm to 6 am).
The noise rating developed for community noise from all sources is the Day-Night
Sound Level (Ldn). It is similar to a 24 hr equivalent sound level except that during
night time period (10 pm to 6 am) a 10 dB (A) weighting penalty is added to the
instantaneous sound level before computing the 24 hr average.
This night time penalty is added to account for the fact that noise during night
when people usually sleep is judged as more annoying than the same noise during
the day time.
The Ldn for a given location in a community may be calculated from the hourly Leq's,
by the following equation.
Where Ld is the equivalent sound level during the daytime (6 am to 10 pm) and Ln
is the equivalent sound level during the nighttime (10 pm to 6 am).
The statistical analysis is done for measured noise levels at eight locations for once
during study period. The parameters are analyzed for Lday, Lnight, and Ldn. These
results are tabulated in Table-3.18.
TABLE-3.18
NOISE LEVELS IN THE STUDY AREA
Code Location L10 L50 L90 LEQ Lday Lnight Ldn
N1 Project Site 42.3 38.7 34.9 39.6 40.5 36.7 43.9
N2 Aruvangattupalayam 41.6 37.1 33.7 38.1 40.1 35.2 42.7
N3 Samiarpalayam 43.5 39.6 35.9 40.6 41.4 37.8 44.9
N4 Sottakavundampalayam 43.0 39.2 35.4 40.2 41.4 37.5 44.7
N5 Chamrajpalayam 45.7 41.5 37.6 42.6 43.6 39.2 46.6
N6 Kasturipalayam 44.5 40.7 36.9 41.7 43.3 39.0 46.3
Tenmugam
N7 46.3 41.5 37.9 42.7 44.8 39.0 46.9
Kangeyampalayam
N8 Chengapalli 51.6 47.7 43.8 48.7 49.6 45.0 52.4
N9 Virumandapalayam 42.9 39.1 35.9 39.9 41.3 37.8 44.9
N10 Periyakkapalayam 41.8 38.3 34.8 39.1 40.0 36.0 43.3
An ecological survey of the study area was conducted particularly with reference
to recording the existing biological resources.
Generate baseline data from field observations from various terrestrial and
aquatic ecosystems;
Characterize the environmental components like land, water, flora and fauna;
and
The great plant wealth and diversity of Tamil Nadu is due to immense variety of
climate, altitude and edaphic factors. Vegetation of the state can be broadly
divided into four categories.
Coastal vegetation
Island vegetation
Vegetation of the interior plains
Vegetation of the hills and mountains
Littoral Vegetation
The soil is sea sand often blown and accumulating in low dunes with adequate time,
but poor in nitrogen and mineral nutrient. Most of these have been converted into
Casuarina plantation. The forest type occurs in reserve forest of Pichavaram, the
littoral forests consists of plant species Borasus flabellifer,Anacardium occidentale,
Lannia coromandalica, Pandanus tectorius, Opuntia dillenii, Cassia auriculata,
Sesuvium portulacastrum, Cyperus arenarius.
Plantation
The vegetation of the plains at the foot or on the undulating slopes of hills and
hillocks in the rocky area bordering the coastal plain comes under Southern
tropical thorn forests of Champion and Seth (1968). These are often called as
Scrub jungles. They are found in Chengalpattu, North and South Arcot,
Pudukottai, Tiruchirapalli, Tirunelveli and less so in Salem, Periyar and
Coimbatore districts. In these scattered forests, trees hardly reach 10 m in height
and area often armed with spines and prickles. Most of the plants manifest
several xeromorphic features. The common trees are Acacia chundra, A. horrida,
A leucophloe, A nilotica ssp. Indica, Albzia amara, Azadirachta indica, Chloroxylon
sweitenia, Dalbergia spinosa, Dichrostachys cineraria, Limonia acidissima,
Plecospermum spinarum, Strychnos nux-vomica, Strychnos potatorum, Wrightia
tinctoria and Zizyphus spp. The shrubs commonly met with are Cadaba fruticosa,
Capparis zeylanica, Carissa congesta, Cassia auriculata, Flacourtia indica,
Maytenus emerginata, Pisonia aculeate, Scutia myrtina, Securegenia leucopyrus
and Toddalia asiatica. The common climbers are cardiospermum canescens,
C.halacacabum, Ceropegia candelabrum, C. juncea, Cissus quadrangularis, C.
rependa, Cissampelos pareira var hirsute, Diosoria sp, Leptadenia reticulate,
Pergularia daemia and Ventilago madraspatna. During rainy season, a variety of
herbaceous plants like Achyranthes aspera, Allamania nodiflora, Apluda mutica,
Aristida setacea, Blumea mollis, Cleome angustifolia and species of Cymbopogon,
Glinus, Indigofera, Leucas, Mollugo and Oldenlandia are seen.
Tropical thorn forest of Tamilnadu are differentiated into southern thorn forest,
Carnatic umbrella thorn forest, Southern Euphorbia scrubs and southern thorn
scrubs (Champion and Seth 1968). In southern thorn forest, species of Acacia,
Mimosa and Zizyphus are predominantly met with. In Carnatic umbrella thorn
forest Acacia planifrons is common. These forests are found in Kanyakumari,
Madurai, Ramanathapuram and Tirunelveli.
This type is below the zone of semi-evergreen forest. The trees reach a height
30-36 m and are deciduous. Bamboos are common. Epiphytes are rare. Bombax
ceiba, Dillenia pentagyna, Mitragyna parviflora, Tectona grandis, Terminalia sp,
Vitex sp, and Zizyphus xylophorus are the common trees. Cycas circinalis is
occasional. Helictris isora, Lantana camara and Zizyphus oenoplia are common
shrubs. Common climber is Ipomea sp. Common grass is Imperata sp
Semi-evergreen forest
This type occurs on slopes of hills and mountains usually upto 1000m. Canopy is
of 2 or 3 storeys. Epiphytis orchids are present. Climbers and canes are common.
Top canopy consists of Artocarpus sp, Dalbergia latifolia, Hopea sp. The second
storey consists of species of Actinodaphne, Aglaia, Bischofia, Drypetes and
Symplocos. Species of Glycosmis, Ixora, Lasianthus, Leea, Memecylon, Pavetta
etc. form the shrubby vegetation. The common climbers are Butea parviflora,
Cynanchum tunicatum, Entada pursaetha and species of Calycopteris, Dioscoria,
Strychnos etc. Bambusa arundanacea and Ochlandra travencorica are also
common.
A preliminary survey was made and five locations for detailed study within 10-km
radius were selected. The selected ecological survey locations are given in Table-
3.19 and shown in Figure3.8.
TABLE-3.19
ECOLOGICAL SURVEY LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
Location Name of the Location Distance w.r.t Direction w.r.t
Code project site (km) project site
Terrestrial
TE1 Kasturipalayam 1.2 ESE
TE2 Kileripatti 4.5 NW
TE3 Velankattupalayam 4.5 ENE
TE4 Chengapalli 2.0 SW
TE5 Uthukuli 4.3 SSE
Aquatic
AE1 Noyyel River 9.0 South
AE2 Melanikkaraipatavalavu 1.5 ENE
TE2 Kileripati
TE3 Velankattupalayam
TE1 Kasturipalayam
TE4 Chengapalli
TE5 Uttukkuli
FIGURE-3.8
ECOLOGICAL SURVEY LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA
VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 73
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific
(Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up
area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi
Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 3
Description of Environment
Raunkiaer defined life forms as the sum of adaptations of plants to climate. Braun-
Blanquet (1951), whose system is adapted in this study, modified the Raunkiaer's
system. Following five of the ten classes created by Braun-Blanquet is present in the
study area and details are presented.
On the basis of field studies, records of Botanical Survey of India and Forest
department, Tamil Nadu state did not indicate presence of any endangered and or
vulnerable species in this area.
leading to extinction. Presence of wildlife could be observed during the study period
and also from information from local tribal inhabitants.
National Park/Sanctuary
As per literature survey in Coimbatore University, various departments of Forest
reveal that there are no Wild life sanctuaries or National Parks or Biosphere or
Hotspots in 10 km and 25 km radius from the proposed project site.
A comprehensive Central Legislation namely Wild Life (Protection) Act was enforced
in 1972 to provide protection to wild animals. Schedule-I of this act contains the list
of rare and endangered species, which are completely protected throughout the
country.
TABLE-3.20
FAUNA AND THEIR CONSERVATION STATUS FROM STUDY AREA
Sr. No. Technical Name English Name / Local Name Wild Life Act
(1972)
Aves
1 Milyus migrans Common Kite Sch-IV
2 Quills contronix Grey quail Sch-IV
3 Corvus splendens House crow Sch-IV
4 Turdoides striatus White headed babbler Sch-IV
5 Aegithina tiphia Iora Sch-IV
6 Pycnonotus cafer Red vented bulbul Sch-IV
7 Pycnonotus jokokus White browed Bulbul Sch-IV
8 Saxicoloides fulicata Indian robin Sch-IV
9 Columbus livibus Rock Pigeon Sch-IV
10 Copsychus saularis Magpie Robin Sch-IV
11 Tchitrea paradisi Paradise Fly catcher Sch-IV
Tephrodornis Common Wood shrike Sch-IV
12 pondiceraianus
13 Lalage sykesi Black headed cuckoo Shrike Sch-IV
14 Artamus fuscus Ashy Swallow Shrike Sch-IV
15 Dicrurus macrocerus Black Drongo Sch-IV
16 Dicrurus longicaudatus Grey Drongo Sch-IV
17 Dissemurus paradiseus Rackete tailed Drongo Sch-IV
18 Oriolus oriolus Indian Oriole Sch-IV
19 Black Headed Oriole Oriolus xanthornus Sch-IV
20 Temenuchus pagodarum Brahmny Myna Sch-IV
21 Acridotheres tristicus Common myna Sch-IV
Sr. No. Technical Name English Name / Local Name Wild Life Act
(1972)
22 Ploceus philippines Weaver bird Sch-IV
23 Uroloncha striata Spotted munia Sch-IV
24 Passer domisticus House Sparrow Sch-IV
25 Redrumped Swallow Hirundo daurica Sch-IV
Sr. No. Technical Name English Name / Local Name Wild Life Act
(1972)
26 Cinnyris asiatica Purple Sunbird Sch-IV
Brachypternus Malabar Golden backed wood Sch-IV
27 bengalensis
28 Megalaima merulinus Indian Cuckoo Sch-IV
29 Hierococys varius Common Hawk Cuckoo Sch-IV
30 Eudynamis scolopaceus Koel Sch-V
31 Centropus sinensis Crow Pheasant Sch-IV
32 Psittacula Krammeri Rose ringed parakeet Sch-IV
33 Coryllis vaeralis Lorikeet Sch-V
34 Coracias benghalensis Indian Roller Sch-IV
35 Merops orinetalis Common Bee Eater Sch-IV
36 Alcedo atthis Common Kingfisher Sch-IV
37 Halcyon smyrensis White breasted kingfisher Sch-IV
38 Microfus affinis House swift Sch-IV
39 Cyprirus parvus Palm swift Sch-IV
40 Caprimulgus asiaticus Common Indian jar Sch-IV
41 Tylo alba Barn Owl Sch-IV
42 Haliastur indus Brahmny kite Sch-IV
43 Milvus migrans Pariah kite Sch-IV
44 Circus aeruginosus Marsh harrier Sch-IV
45 Chalcophaps indica Emerald Dove Sch-IV
46 Lobvanella indicus Redwattled Lapwing Sch-IV
47 Lobpluvia malabaraica Yellow wattled lapwing Sch-IV
48 Anhinga melanogaster Darter Sch-V
49 Egretta garzetta Little Egret Sch-IV
50 Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Sch-IV
51 Ardeola grayii Pond Heron Sch-IV
52 Anas querquedula Gangney Teal Sch-IV
53 Anas acuta Common Teal Sch-IV
54 Aythya feroma White eyed Pochard Sch-IV
55 Gallinula chlorpus Moorhen Sch-IV
56 Sterna albifrons Indian River Tern Sch-IV
57 Galerida malabarica Malabar Crested Lark Sch-IV
Reptiles
58 Hemidactylus sp House Lizard Sch-IV
59 Calotes versicolor Garden Lizard Sch-IV
60 Sitana pondiceriana Green Lizard Sch-IV
61 Chameleon zeylanicus Lizard Sch-IV
62 Draco sps Draco Sch-IV
63 Varanus benghalensis Monitor Lizard Sch-IV
64 Nerodia piscator Fresh water snake Sch-III
65 Dendrophis sps Tree snake Sch-III
Sr. No. Technical Name English Name / Local Name Wild Life Act
(1972)
66 Dendrolaphis sps Green tree snake Sch-III
67 Naja naja Cobra Sch-II
68 Hemibungarussps Indian coral snake Sch-II
69 Bungarus candidus Krait Sch-III
70 Vipera russeli Viper Sch-II
71 Trimeresurus meacrolepis Pit viper Sch-II
72 Groemyda bijuga Fresh water tortoise Sch-III
73 Testudo travencoriana Land tortoise Sch-III
Butterflies
74 Triodes minos Southern Birdwing Sch-IV
75 Papilo demoleus Lime butterfly Sch-IV
76 Graphium agamemnos Tailed jay Sch-IV
77 Papilo polymnstor Blue Mormon Sch-IV
78 Neptis hylas Common sailor Sch-IV
Amphibians
79 Rana hexadactyla Frog Sch-IV
80 Rana tigrina Bull frog Sch-IV
81 Cocopus sps Burrowing frog Sch-IV
Mammals
82 Lepus nigricollis Hare Sch-III
83 Hyaena hyaena Hyaena Sch-III
84 Canis auries Jackal Sch-III
85 Funambulus spp. Squirrel Sch-IV
86 Sus sucrofa Wild pig Sch-III
87 Rattus norvegicus Field mouse Sch-IV
88 Herpestes edwardii Common mongoose Sch-IV
89 Bandicota indica Bandicoot Sch-IV
Phytoplankton
Phytoplankton forms the basis of food chain in any aquatic water body. The
diversity and abundance of phytoplankton mainly depends on the region, type of
water body, either lentic or lotic, the nutrient flux in the system and the sunlight
available for photosynthesis. These factors together form the dynamics of
phytoplankton productivity over the seasons. The phytoplankton of given water
body determines the zooplankton populations and the fish productivity of the
ecosystem.
Zooplankton
The zooplankton of the aquatic water body are the primary consumers and also in
cases secondary producers which play an important role for the fisheries of that
system. The diversity and abundance of zooplankton also depends on whether the
water body is eutrophic or oligotrophic. About 14 species of zooplankton were
reported from all the locations. They also are good representatives of the
ecosystem health. The amount and type of pollutants in the water body determine
the type of zooplankton species. Species of copepod will usually dominate in the
tropical region while more eutrophicated waters with high nutrient or organic
loads will harbor high number of crustaceans and arthropods. The less polluted
waters will have more of cladocerans and rotifers.
Among the zooplankton group, Asplancha sp. had highest percentage composition
and the lowest percentage composition was of Ceriodaphnia sp. in the total
zooplankton. The list of plankton recorded in fresh water bodies in study area
during study period are presented in Table- 3.21.
TABLE- 3.21
LIST OF PLANKTON RECORDED DURING STUDY PERIOD
Fishes
The Melanikkarai pattavalavu is the pond in the study area and the list of principal
catchers is given in Table- 3.22
TABLE- 3.22
AQUATIC FAUNA FROM STUDY AREA
Sr. No Local Name Zoological Name
1 Catla Catla catla
2 Rohu Labeo rohita
3 Mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala
4 Silver Carp Thirmethrix molitrix
5 Grass Carp Ctenopheringodon idella
6 Common Carp Cyprinus carpio
3.8.11 Conclusion
From the field observations it can be concluded that the forests in the study area
are under anthropogenic pressure and show signs of degradation in the form of
tree cutting, lopping, grazing and collection of NTFPs and habitat fragmentation.
As per MOEF and Forest Department of Tamil Nadu state reveals that there are no
Wildlife sanctuaries, National parks/biosphere reserves in 10 km radius from the
proposed project site boundary. As per the records of the Botanical Survey of
India there are no plants of conservation importance in the study area.
3.9.1 Objectives
To give recommendations for optimizing the future land use pattern vis-a-vis
proposed project in the study area and its associated impacts.
3.9.2 Methodology
The land use pattern of the study area has been studied by analyzing the available
secondary data such as the District Census Handbook on Landuse of Coimbatore &
Tiruppur Districts.
The land use is classified into four types - viz. Forests area, Area irrigated by
source, Total unirrigated land, Area under non-agricultural uses, Culturable waste
land, Barren & Un-cultivable land & other areas.
The land-use pattern of the study area based on 2011 census is given in Table-
3.23. The village-wise land use pattern of the study area is presented in
Annexure -XXIII.
TABLE-3.23
LANDUSE PATTERN IN THE STUDY AREA
Sr. 0 - 3 km 3 - 7 km 7 -10 km 0- 10 km
Particulars
No. (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha)
1 Forest Area 382.66 1748.31 2230.48 4361.45
2 Area Irrigated by Source 432.68 2476.2 5514.79 8423.67
3 Total Unirrigated Land 1420.31 4049.74 3061.68 8531.73
Area under Non-Agricultural
4 0 0 130.32 130.32
Uses
5 Culturable Waste Land 0 30.48 695.13 725.61
6 Barren & Un-cultivable Land 3.41 70.95 219.62 293.98
7 Other areas 1002.25 3364.78 6046.15 10413.18
Total 3241.3 11740.5 17898.2 32879.9
Source: District Census Handbook on Landuse, 2011 Coimbatore & Tiruppur District
Forest
Forest occupies a small portion of the study area covering about 194.44-ha. This
works out to about 0.92% of the study area.
Culturable Waste
This category of land mainly consists of the lands suitable for cultivation, which
however have not been brought under cultivation at any time. The area under this
category is about 3434.57-ha in the study area and works out to about 16.21% of
the study area.
Remote sensing satellite imageries were collected and interpreted for the 10-km
radius study area for analyzing the Land use pattern of the study area. Based on
the satellite data, Land use/ Land cover maps have been prepared.
The present Land use/Land cover maps were prepared based on the classification
system of National standards. For explanation for each of the Land use category,
the details as given in Table-3.25 were considered.
IRS P6 LISS IV MAX Satellite imagery was acquired on 4 th March 2010 and was
used for the mapping and interpretation. Besides, other collateral data as
available in the form of maps, charts, census records, other reports and especially
topographical survey of India maps are used. In addition to this, ground truth
survey was also conducted to verify and confirm the ground features.
TABLE-3.24
LAND USE/LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
3.9.2.3 Methodology
The methodology adopted for the preparation of Land use/Land cover thematic
map is as follows:
Field observations
The methodology adopted for preparation of land use/ land cover thematic map is
monoscopic visual interpretation of geo coded scenes of IRS P6 LISS-IV MAX-5m
resolution satellite and field observations are taken. The various steps involved in
the study are preparatory field work, field survey and post field work.
The False Color Composite (FCC) of IRS P6 LISS-IV-5m resolution satellite data
are used for pre field interpretation work. Taking the help of topo sheets,
geology, and geomorphology and by using the image elements the features are
identified and delineated the boundaries roughly. Each feature is identified on
image by their image elements like tone, texture, color, shape, size, pattern and
association. A tentative legend in terms of Land Use/Land Cover, physiography
and erosion was formulated. The sample areas for field check are selected
covering all the physiography, Land use/Land cover feature cum image
characteristics.
The final output would be the Land use/Land cover map numerals were given
different colour code for each category as shown in map. Area estimation of all
features of Land use/Land cover categories was noted.
3.9.2.6 Observations
The following are the main interpreted land use/land cover classes of the study
area and their respective areas are given in hectares in Table 3.25 for the year
2016. The thematic map of study area and land use pattern within 10 km radius
based on IRS P6 LISS-IV-5m resolution is shown in Figure-3.11(A) and Figure-
3.11(B) respectively.
Built Up Area
The built up area is 1493.0 ha, which is about 4.25% of the study area.
Barren land
The barren land is 17.0 ha, which is about 0.05% of the study area.
Deciduous Forest
The Deciduous Forest is 326.0 ha, which is about 0.93% of the study area.
Double Crop Land
The Double Crop Land is 3231.0 ha, which is about 9.20% of the study area.
TABLE 3.25
LANDUSE BREAKUP DETAILS IN 10 KM RADIUS
Source:
FIGURE-3.9
LAND USE / LAND COVER THEMATIC MAP OF THE STUDY AREA
The methodology adopted for the study is based on the review of secondary data,
such as District Census Statistical Handbooks-2011 and the records of National
Informatics Center, New Delhi, for the parameters of demography, occupational
structure of people within the general study area of 10-km radius around the
proposed project site.
3.10.3 Demography
3.10.3.1Distribution of Population
As per 2011 census, the study area consists of 2,99,284 persons. The distribution
of population in the study area is given in Table-3.26. The males and females
each constitute 50% of the study area population.
TABLE-3.26
DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION
The average household size of the study area is 4 persons. The low family size
could be attributed to a high degree of urbanization, effective birth control,
economic sense to have a small family, migration of people with higher literacy
levels who generally opt for smaller family size and family welfare measures.
The males and females each constitute 50% of the study area population as per
2011 census records. The sex ratio i.e. the number of females per 1000 males
indirectly reveals certain sociological aspects in relation with female births, infant
mortality among female children and single person family structure, a resultant of
migration of industrial workers. The study area on an average has 986 females
per 1000 males as per 2011 census.
TABLE-3.27
DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BY SOCIAL STRUCTURE
Sr.No Particulars 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km
1 Scheduled caste 2847 10449 22712 36008
2 % to the total population 97 47 38 42
3 Schedule Tribes 70 81 187 338
4 % to the total population 2.4 0.4 0.3 0.4
5 Total SC and ST
population 2917 10530 22899 36346
6 % to the total population 99 47 38 43
7 Other castes population 28 11914 36673 48615
8 Total population 2945 22444 59572 84961
Source: District Primary Census Hand Book Coimbatore & Tiruppur District, 2011
The study area experiences literacy rate of 54.68%. The distribution of literate
and literacy rate in the study area is given in Table-3.28.
TABLE 3.28
DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATE AND LITERACY RATES
Sr. No Particulars 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km
1 Total Literate 6,307 54,829 1,54,796 2,15,932
2 Total Population 9,972 78,790 2,10,522 2,99,284
3 Average Literacy (%) 63 70 74 72
4 Male Population 5,032 39,687 1,05,985 1,50,704
5 Male Literate 3,647 30,187 83,051 1,16,885
6 % To Total Male
Population 72 76 78 78
7 Female Population 4,940 39,103 1,04,537 1,48,580
8 Female Literate 2,660 24,642 71,745 99,047
9 % To Total Female
Population 54 63 69 67
Source: District Primary Census Hand Book Coimbatore & Tiruppur District, 2011
The male literacy i.e. the percentage of male literates to the total males of the
study area works out to be 78%. The female literacy rate, which is an important
indication for social change is observed to be 67% in the study area as per 2011
census.
The occupational structure of residents in the study area is studied with reference
to main workers, marginal workers and non-workers. The main workers include
10 categories of workers defined by the Census Department consisting of
cultivators, agricultural labourers, those engaged in live-stock, forestry, fishing,
mining and quarrying; manufacturing, processing and repairs in household
industry; and other than household industry, construction, trade and commerce,
transport and communication and other services.
The marginal workers are those workers engaged in some work for a period of
less than six months during the reference year prior to the census survey. The
non-workers include those engaged in unpaid household duties, students, retired
persons, dependents, beggars, vagrants etc.; institutional inmates or all other
non-workers who do not fall under the above categories.
TABLE-3.29
OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE
Particulars 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km
Total population 9,972 78,790 2,10,522 2,99,284
Total main workers 4,891 36,477 91,281 1,32,649
% to total population 49 46 43 44
Marginal workers 1,069 2,094 7,047 10,210
% to total population 11 3 3 3
Non-workers 4,012 38,846 1,08,333 1,51,191
% to total population 40 49 51 51
Source: District Primary Census Hand Book Coimbatore & Tiruppur District, 2001
As per 2011 census records, altogether the main workers works out to be 44% of
the total population. The marginal workers and non-workers constitute to 3% and
51% of the total population respectively. The distribution of workers by
occupation indicates that the non-workers are the predominant population. The
occupational structure of the study area is shown in Table-3.29.
With the proposed project, the transportation is likely to increase the road
network during the operational phase on the nearest road. The influence of the
traffic are examined based of adequacy of the existing road network.
TABLE-3.30
LOCATION DETAILS
Sr.No Particulars Details
1 Site co-ordinates Points Latitude Longitude
A 11o 12 36.57 N 77o 26 23.65 E
B 11o 12 53.39 N 79o 27 09.06 E
C 11o 12 21.85 N 79o 27 13.39 E
D 11o 12 06.73 N 79o 26 49.48 E
2 Elevation above MSL 299 AMSL
3 Nearest Highway NH-47 (0.7 km, North)
4 Nearest Railway Uthukuli R.S (5.2 km, South)
Station
5 Nearest Airport Coimbatore Airport (48.0 km, ESE)
6 Seismicity Zone Zone III as per IS:1893 (Part -1) 2002
TABLE-3.31
DETAILS OF TRAFFIC MONITORING LOCATION
Location
Location Details
Code
T-1 Kochi Salem Highway NH-47
FIGURE-3.10
TRAFFIC SAMPLING LOCATION IN NH-47
TABLE-3.32
ROAD GEOMETRIC SCENARIO
Road
Surface Street Road Road
Road width Lanes Remarks
Condition lights Markings signs
(m)
Divided road
Kochi Salem
22 4 Good A A A with street
Highway
lights
TABLE-3.23
IRC GUIDELINES
Capacity in PCUs per hour for various traffic
conditions
No of Roads with no Roads with Roads with
traffic frontage frontage free frontage
lanes Traffic flow access, no access but no access,
and standing standing parked
widths vehicles, very vehicles and vehicles and
little cross high capacity heavy cross
traffic intersections traffic
2 - lane One way 2400 1500 1200
(7 7.5 Two way 1500 1200 750
m)
3 lane One way 3600 2500 2000
(10.5 m)
4 - lane One way 4800 3000 2400
(14 m) Two way 4000 2500 2000
6 lane One way* 3600 2500 2200
(21 m) Two way 6000 4200 3600
*denotes for three lanes in predominant direction of flow
TABLE-3.24
IRC LOS GUIDELINES
The hourly vehicular traffic densities for continuous normal day at each location
observed during the study period and the same are presented in Table-6, 7 & 8.
Location Number : T-1
Details of Location : Kochi Salem Highway
TABLE-3.25
TRAFFIC DENSITIES
TABLE-3.26
EXISTING TRAFFIC SCENARIO
Existing V/C
Road V C* LOS
Ratio
1.4 Conclusion
The existing level of service (LOS) of the Salem Kochi Highway is C which is
Good/ Average/ Fair.
This chapter deals with the identification and appraisal of various environmental
and social impacts due to the proposed project based on the prevailing baseline
setting and inventory of pollution sources described in the previous chapters.
The proposed project is likely to create impact on the environment in two distinct
phases:
The proposed development will be carried out in 97.54 ha (241.01 acres) plot in
SEZ notified area of 103.65 ha (256.1 acres) of Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam
Village, Tiruppur district. The site is devoid of any forest; hence the site clearance
from the Forest Department is not prerequisite. Also, the site is devoid of any
human habitations so evacuation is not necessary. Hence, there is no
resettlement and rehabilitation issues are involved in the proposed project.
Once after the completion of construction phase, as the topsoil collected during
construction phase will be re-used for growth of plants, no adverse impact is
envisaged.
The dripping of oil from construction vehicles might cause soil contamination. In
order to prevent soil contamination likely to result from the oil spill and dripping
from vehicles, drip pans will be placed at the parking places of vehicles and the
dripped oil will be collected. The collected dripped oil will be stored and
subsequently sent to the authorized recycling agencies, recognized by TNPCB.
No major vegetative cover exists in the immediate vicinity of the project. Hence
no impacts on terrestrial flora and fauna are envisaged due to construction
activities.
During construction phase, water will be required only for construction of structures,
sprinkling on roads for dust suppression, domestic and non-domestic uses of the
construction workers, that too only during daytime.
The topsoil excavated from the project site will be used for covering the area leveled
with excavated material from foundation trenches, on which tree plantations and
green belt development within the project premises will be undertaken.
During construction phase, total solid waste in terms of food packet wrappers will
be generated. In order to avoid any solid waste disposal problems, an effective
solid waste management system by means of collection of wastes in dust bins
and transporting the same to the authorized dumping grounds by the contractors.
Strict adherence to the established solid waste collection and disposal system will
ensure clean environment during construction period.
The major sources of noise during the construction phase will be due to operation
of construction equipments such as rock drills, pneumatic tools, concrete mixers,
cranes, generators, pumps, compressors, vibrators, etc. The operation of these
equipments will generate noise ranging between 70-85 dB (A). Due to moderate
levels of construction activities, the anticipated noise generation during
construction phase will be mostly confined to the facility itself and not anticipated
to have significant adverse impacts on the surrounding ambient noise levels. In
order to have less impact on noise levels in the area, the major works will be
carried out during daytime as far as possible.
Some construction equipments may generate more noise levels and might affect
the personnel operating these equipments. In order to safeguard the construction
workers working at the noise generation sources, these personnel will be provided
with proper personal protective equipments such as earplugs, earmuffs, etc.
Hence, no significant impact is envisaged due to the operation of the noise
generating equipment at the project site, if suitable mitigation measures are
adopted.
The proposed developmental area is devoid of forest or thick vegetation. Only small
bushes which have grown in the recent past due to non-cultivation of the area will
be removed during leveling operations. Hence, there will not be any major impact
on the terrestrial ecology of the project site due to construction activities.
The construction of this textile SEZ will be undertaken only during the non-monsoon
season; hence no run-off or discharges from the site will be let out. Further, suitable
rainwater harvesting structures will be provided to collect during monsoon period.
Hence, no impact of water and wastewater discharges and associated environmental
pollution are envisaged during construction phase of the project. Accordingly, no
adverse impact on aquatic ecology of nearby tanks is envisaged during this phase.
The following activities related to the project are anticipated to have varying
degree of impacts on the environment, hence considered for impact assessment:
Topography;
Land use and building construction;
Soil quality;
Water quality;
Storm water drainage;
Solid waste generation;
Air quality;
Noise levels;
Traffic and
Terrestrial and aquatic ecology
During the operational phase of the project, the land area which presently is an
unclassified zone will be transformed as an industrial zone with a well laid out
internal roads, industrial plots, warehouses, beautiful greenbelt, efficient air and
water circulation systems, impressive lighting system, efficient firefighting system
etc. Accordingly, there will be an immense positive impact on the land use
pattern of the proposed project site due to the area development.
All the structures in the proposed project development will be carried out as per
the prevailing stipulations of Govt. of Tamil Nadu. Care will be taken in provision
of adequate parking spaces as per DTCP norms, the project development will not
face any shortage in parking space and accordingly all vehicles of the project area
will be parked inside the project site premises. This will not compel the project
managers to park the visitors vehicles on the roads, outside the project, hence, it
will not cause for traffic congestions and hindrances or inconveniences to
movements of people on the roads and walkways.
All the impacts related with soils are restricted to the construction phase only;
hence there will not be any impact of the proposed development on soils of the
project site during the operational phase. The topsoil removed during construction
stage will be spread on greenbelt area where trees will be developed. The matured
plantation will help reduction of possible soil erosion.
The probable sources causing degradation of soil in the project area are due to
generation of solid wastes and wastewater from the proposed project development.
As appropriate solid waste management systems will be followed, no soil pollution is
anticipated in the proposed project.
Further, the proposed greenbelt, green cover and avenue plantation measures will
enrich the soil binding characteristics and preserve topsoil from erosion.
The project site falls in the Seismic Intensity Zone-III, which is not prone for
severe earthquakes. Hence, this project is not likely to face any impact due to
severe earthquakes. Adequate care will be taken in construction of structures to
withstand tremors of earthquakes, if such eventuality occurs.
The total water requirement for the project has been estimated to be 1,407 KLD
which is a one-time requirement and daily fresh water make up of 127 KLD will
be met through New Tiruppur Area Development Corporation Limited (NTADCL).
The wastewater generated from industrial units with activities such as dyeing and
sizing activities shall be treated in the effluent treatment plant of capacity
1750 KLD and the sewage generated from industrial plots will be treated in
Sewage Treatment Plant of 275 KLD capacity respectively. The treated water
from ETP shall be reused for dyeing process and the treated sewage will be re-
used for process such as warping, looming & greenbelt. No wastewater will be
discharged outside the premise.
TABLE-4.1
WASTEWATER GENERATION (SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT)
The solid waste generated from the textile SEZ are classified to process waste
and domestic waste. In domestic waste, source segregation are proposed with
common collection and disposal, using color coded bins positioned at each plots.
The biodegradable wastes shall be collected, segregated and composted within
the project premise. Sludge generated from STP of quantity 0.9 TPD and
horticulture waste, such as dried leaves, flowers etc. shall be utilized as manure
for greenbelt
TABLE-4.2
SOLID WASTE GENERATION & MANAGEMENT
The process waste shall be again categorized into hazardous and non-hazardous
waste. Non-hazardous process waste such as end bits, cuttings shall be reused
again in process. Hazardous process waste such as MEE salt, ETP sludge, RO
reject, Solar bed residue, used oil shall be collected & stored in dykes, PE bags &
barrels. Adequate solid waste storage area of 1.5 ha has been allocated in the
project premise and the waste shall be kept with accordance to the material
compatibility. The stored waste shall be periodically disposed to secured disposal
centre authorized by CPCB/ TNPCB. Hence, the generation of solid wastes in the
proposed project development will not create adverse impacts.
4.3.7 Impact due to Fire Accidents
The proposed project design and development has been planned with utmost care
and all provisions have been made for the safety and security of the property as
well as the personnel.
Being an infrastructure project, the major source of air pollution is from DG Sets.
The DG Sets generate pollutants like Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5), Sulphur
dioxide (SO2) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx). The sources of air pollution in the
process have been identified and quantified.
Aermod View
Aermod Model
The AERMOD model includes a wide range of options for modeling air quality
impacts of pollution sources, making it popular choice among the modeling
community for a variety of applications. AERMOD requires two types of
meteorological data files, a file containing surface scalar parameters and a file
containing vertical profiles. These two files are provided by AERMET
meteorological preprocessor program.
PRIME building downwash algorithms based on the ISC PRIME model have
been added to the AERMOD model;
Use of arrays for data storage;
Incorporation of EVENT processing for analyzing short-term source culpability;
Explicit treatment of multiple year meteorological data files and the annual
average; and
Options to specify emissions that vary by season, hour-of-day and day-of-
week.
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 99
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific
(Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up
area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi
Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 4
Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures
Aermet
In order to conduct a refined air dispersion modeling project using the AERMOD
short-term air quality dispersion model, it is necessary to process the
meteorological data representative of the study area being modeled. The
collected meteorological data is not always in the format supported by the model,
therefore the meteorological data needs to be pre-processed using AERMET
program.
Application of AERMOD
AERMOD model with the following options has been employed to predict the
cumulative ground level concentrations due to emissions from the proposed
activity.
Meteorological Data
The hourly meteorological data recorded at site is converted to the mean hourly
meteorological data as specified by CPCB and the same has been used in the
model. Hourly mixing heights are taken from the Atlas of Hourly Mixing Height
and Assimilative Capacity of Atmosphere in India published by India
meteorological department, 2008, New Delhi. The meteorological data recorded
during study period continuously on wind speed, wind direction, temperature etc.,
have been processed to extract the data required for simulation by AERMOD
using AERMET. The meteorological input data used for the model is presented in
Table-4.3.
TABLE-4.3
HOURLY MEAN METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Wind Air
Time in Windspeed Stability Mixing
direction in Temperature
hours in m/s class height in m
degrees in oK
00:00 2.0 225 303.15 1 1000
01:00 2.0 180 303.15 1 1000
02:00 4.1 215 303.15 1 1000
03:00 3.6 215 303.15 1 1000
04:00 4.1 215 303.15 2 1000
05:00 5.6 215 303.15 2 900
06:00 3.6 215 303.15 1 800
07:00 0.0 215 304.15 4 800
08:00 3.6 205 306.15 4 200
09:00 2.8 205 306.15 6 200
10:00 4.0 205 309.15 6 200
11:00 2.6 205 310.15 6 200
12:00 4.6 180 310.15 6 200
13:00 4.3 180 309.15 6 200
14:00 5.6 180 309.15 6 200
15:00 0.0 180 309.15 6 200
16:00 4.4 225 307.15 6 200
17:00 4.4 225 306.15 6 200
18:00 3.6 225 305.15 6 500
19:00 2.9 225 305.15 6 800
20:00 2.9 250 304.15 6 800
21:00 2.9 250 304.15 4 800
22:00 3.0 250 304.15 1 800
23:00 2.9 250 304.15 1 1000
TABLE-4.4
DETAILS OF STACKS
Sr. Height Dia. CSA
Source
No. (m) (m) (m2)
1. IG3 Infra limited - Proposed Textile SEZ
Individual stack attached to DG Set I
a. 8.0 0.50 0.943
(125 KVA)
Individual stack attached to DG Set II
b. 8.0 0.50 0.943
(125 KVA)
Individual stack attached to DG Set III
c. 8.0 0.50 0.943
(125 KVA)
2. IG3 Infra Limited Thermal Power Plant
a. Individual stack attached to Boiler 76.0 2.0 3.142
TABLE-4.5
ANTICIPATED STACK EMISSIONS
IG3 Thermal
Proposed Textile SEZ
Parameters Units Power Plant
Stack 1 Stack 2 Stack 3 Stack 4
Stack attached to DG Set DG Set DG Set CFBC boiler
Made of M.S M.S M.S M.S
Capacity 185 KVA 185 KVA 185 KVA 250 TPH
Stack Height m 8.0 8.0 8.0 76.0
Stack diameter at exit m 0.15 0.15 0.15 2.0
Cross sectional area m2 0.02 0.02 0.02 3.142
Flue gas Temperature oC 139 139 139 150
Exit Gas velocity m/s 13.4 14.2 13.8 14.0
Volumetric flow rate Nm3/hr 828 864 828 1,11,562
Particulate matter g/s 0.012 0.012 0.012 1.55
Sulphur dioxides g/s 0.095 0.095 0.095 75.46
Nitrogen oxides g/s 0.012 0.012 0.012 1.55
Presentation of Results
In the present case model simulations have been carried out for the period 1st
June 31st August, 2016. For the short-term simulations, the concentrations
were estimated around 1200 receptor points chosen to obtain an optimum
description of variations in concentrations over the site in 10-km radius covering
16 directions. The predicted incremental ground levels concentration for PM, SO 2
and NOX are given in Table-4.6. The predicted ground level concentration
isopleths are given in Figure-4.1 to 4.3.
FIGURE-4.1
SHORT TERM 24 HOURLY INCREMENTAL GLC OF PM
FIGURE-4.2
SHORT TERM 24 HOURLY INCREMENTAL GLC OF SO 2
FIGURE-4.3
SHORT TERM 24 HOURLY INCREMENTAL GLC OF NOx
TABLE-4.6
SHORT TERM MAXIMUM INCREMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS
TABLE-4.7
RESULTANT CONCENTRATIONS AFTER PROPOSED PROJECT
A perusal of the table above covered under each activity reveals that there will be a
marginal increase in terms of pollution load. However, it can be observed that the
resultant ambient air quality after considering the point source emissions, fugitive /
area source emissions and line source emissions are well below the limits as per
national ambient air quality standards, 2009 and the area has sufficient carrying
capacity to accommodate the industrial development.
Fugitive Emissions
To assess the existing traffic density in the proposed project development, traffic
counts were carried out on the Kochi Salem Highway which is the major feeder
traffic point to/from the site; to provide background values of traffic density, and
correlate such data to the levels of air pollution along the road.
Vehicular traffic on these roads includes heavy vehicle, light vehicle, three wheelers
and two wheelers. Major traffic flow occurs between 6 AM to 11 PM on these roads.
The additional traffic due to the proposed project would also occur in this time
duration only. The proposed development would generate an additional vehicles of
10 numbers per day. The PCU generated from the traffic doesnt create a significant
impact. Hence the level of service continues to be C which is Good/fair/average
after the development of the proposed project.
The prediction of incremental noise levels due to the operation phase of the
project has been carried out using mathematical model. Noise levels are mainly
generated from billet removal, cutting, blowers and cooling tower. The noise
sources have been defined with respect to plant and given in Table-4.8.
TABLE-4.8
ANTICIPATED NOISE EMISSIONS
The model results are discussed below and the predicted model results at project
boundary are presented in Figure-4.4.
-1000.00 -800.00 -600.00 -400.00 -200.00 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00
1000.00 1000.00
800.00 800.00
600.00 600.00
400.00 400.00
200.00 200.00
0.00 0.00
-200.00 -200.00
-400.00 -400.00
-600.00 -600.00
-800.00 -800.00
-1000.00 -1000.00
-1000.00 -800.00 -600.00 -400.00 -200.00 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00
FIGURE- 4.4
PREDICTED NOISE CONTOUR
The damage risk criteria as enforced by OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health
Administration) to reduce hearing loss, stipulates that noise level upto 90 dB(A)
are acceptable for 8 hour working shift per day. It was observed from the
proposed development, noise levels ranging between 60 64 dB (A) and it will be
limited to work zone only. At the corners of the plant boundary, noise levels will
be varying between 44 dB (A) to 46 dB (A).
Land Environment
The top soil from the excavated areas will be preserved in separate stacks for
re-use during the development of greenbelt;
Water Environment
During monsoon period, the surface run-off will be likely to be affected due to the
construction work and loosening of topsoil. This will be likely to increase the
suspended solids in the run-off during heavy precipitation. Construction activities
will be sustained during heavy rains and construction material shall be properly
covered.
Sanitation
The construction site will be provided with adequate toilet facilities for workers to
meet the proper standards of hygiene. These facilities will be made in a precise
way to reduce environmental impact.
Air Environment
During construction period, there will be likelihood of generation of dust and NOx
emissions. This can be attributed to leveling activity and vehicular movement.
The transport vehicles using petrol or diesel should be properly maintained to
minimize smoke in the exhaust. Truck mounted sprinkling method is suggested to
address this issue.
Since there will be likelihood of fugitive dust from the construction activity, material
handling and from the truck movement in the premises, the project should go for
greenbelt development along the boundaries of the project site.
Noise Environment
Provision for insulating caps and aids at the exit of noise source on the
machinery;
The use of damping materials such as thin rubber/lead sheet for wrapping the
work places like compressors, generator sheets;
Shock absorbing techniques will be adopted to reduce impact;
Inlet and outlet mufflers will be provided, which are easy to design;
Earmuffs will be provided to the workers and it should be enforced to be used
by the workers;
Noise prone activities will be restricted to the extent possible during night
time, particularly during the period between 10 pm to 6 am in order to have
minimum environmental impact on the workers as well as on the
neighbourhood; and
No worker will be allowed to expose to more than 90 dB (A) in an 8-hour shift
and under no circumstance the noise level from any equipment will be greater
than 115 dB (A).
Ecological Aspects
Project site is a vacant land and there is no occurrence of vegetation at site. The
exquisite greenbelt will developed to mitigate adverse impacts. A comprehensive
greenbelt programme will improve the ecological condition of the region.
Traffic
The hazardous materials used during the construction may include petrol, diesel,
welding gas and paints. These materials will be stored and handled as per the
guidelines specified under Hazardous Wastes (Storage, Handling and
Transportation) Management Rules of Environment Protection Act. Some of the
precautions of storage include the following:
Site Security
Adequate security arrangement will be made to ensure that the local inhabitants
and the stray cattle are not exposed to the potential hazards of construction
activities.
Migrant Laborers
Safe and secure camping area will be provided for the migrant laborers during the
construction period. Adequate arrangements will be made for water supply,
sanitation and cooking fuels.
The construction site should be provided with sufficient and suitable toilet facilities
for workers to allow proper standards of hygiene. These facilities will be connected
to a packaged STP and maintained to ensure minimum environmental impact.
Potable Water: Sufficient supply of water suitable for drinking will be provided at
appropriate places.
Sanitary Facility: Within the precinct of very work place, latrines and urinals
should be provided at accessible place. These should be cleaned at least twice
during working hours and kept in a good sanitary condition. The contractor should
conform to sanitary requirement of local medical and health authorities at all
times.
Facilities for Women: Facilities as per Factory Rules of the State Government will
be provided to the women work force. Separate toilets for women will be
provided with appropriate signboards.
The EMP in the design stage endeavors to mitigate the problems related to health,
safety and environment at the initial stage itself. The proposed facilities will be
designed taking into account all applicable standards/norms both for regulatory and
safety purpose.
The design of the project will be made by laying special emphasis on the measures
to minimize sewage generation and emission control at source. The specific control
measures related to gaseous emissions, liquid sewage discharges, noise generation,
solid waste disposal, etc., are described below:
Major pollutants envisaged from the proposed project are Particulates (PM10 &
PM2.5), SO2 and NOx due to mobile vehicles and operation of DG sets during
power failure. The operation of DG sets will only be a temporary occurrence.
Further, the DG sets are provided with adequate stack height for dispersion of air
pollutants. Hence it will not cause any major adverse impact on air environment.
The emission standards of the vehicles plying in the complex will be of
international standards. Euro-IV/Bharat-IV standards will be used.
Parking Facilities
The project will be provided with adequate parking area as per Directorate of
Town and Country Planning (DTCP) norms. A total surface parking area of 1.0 ha
has been allotted. Additional traffic load due to the proposed project will be taken
care by contracted lessee. Additionally, it will also be managed using parking
areas in the upcoming phase.
The one time total water requirement of the project is about 1,407 KLD and daily
fresh water make up is 127 KLD. Both will be met through New Tiruppur Area
Development Corporation Limited (NTADCL). Wastage of water will be totally
controlled and only the minimum quantum of water will be used.
Water Conservation
The quantity of wastewater generation depends upon the quantity of water used
for various purposes. The total quantum of wastewater generation ie., from
sewage (92 KLD) and effluent (1288.29 KLD) will be about 1,380.3 KLD.
Rainwater from roof tops will be diverted to UG tanks (600 KLD). The storm water
from greenbelt and vacant areas will be provided with drain/trench to rainwater
collection pits (723 nos.) along the periphery of the site. Storm water generated
in paved area shall be diverted to rainwater harvesting pond (capacity: 7.5 MLD).
Non-hazardous process wastes like end bits (0.23 TPD) and cloth cuttings
(0.57 TPD) will be reused within the process. Hazardous solid wastes such as MEE
salt (0.4 TPD), CETP Sludge (1.6 TPD) will be disposed to secured disposal centre
authorized by CPCB/TNPCB.
The incremental noise levels due to the proposed project development will be less
than 45-dB(A) near the project boundaries in all the directions. The ambient noise
levels in the region are within the permissible limits. However, the greenbelt to be
provided will further attenuate the noise levels.
Recommendations
Noise levels would be reduced by the use of absorbing material on roof walls
and floors;
The project area would be thickly vegetated with species of rich canopy; and
Adequate green belt and green cover and avenue plantation with an average
density will be created to attenuate noise levels.
The greenbelt helps to capture the fugitive emissions and to attenuate the noise
generated in the premises apart from improving the aesthetics of the site.
Plantation program should be undertaken in all available areas. This would include
plantation in the premises, along the internal and external roads and in between
buildings.
The plant species selected for greenbelt will include the native species. These
saplings will be planted in rows. About 34.1% (33.2 ha) of the total geographical
land of the site will be brought under greenbelt/green cover program.
The plantation at the proposed project development will take into consideration of
the social forestry in the region.
Delonix regia
Polyalthia longifolia
Plumeria obtusa
Spathodea campanulata
Schizolobium parahybum
Samanea saman
Cocos nuciferas
Livistona rotundifolia
Phoenix sylvestris
The above-mentioned species not only resist water stress but also covers the
ground quickly and also have wider soil adaptability. For protecting the
environment from dust, temperature, chemicals, emissions, the following species
have been recommended:
Syzygium cumminii
Casuarina equisetifolia
Orodoxia regia
Cassia species
Caesalpinia Pilcherrima
Azadirachta indica
Polyalthia longifolira
Thespesia populanea
Bauhinia purpuria
Bauhinia recemosa
Ponqamia glabra
Peltophorum ferrusinium
Mangifera indica
Dalberqia sissoo
Tecoma stans
Pongamia glabra
Peltophorum ferrusinium
Somania saman
Mimusops elinqi
Cassia fistula
Bauhinia variegata
Bombax ceiba
Delonix elata
Sesbania grandiflora
Terminalia catapa
The textile SEZ will further enhance the development of the region and open
several employment opportunities in this region. The social and infrastructural
facilities in the region will be developed directly or indirectly due to the project.
In keeping with the tradition and value system of the IG3 Group, IG3 has
been supporting and strengthening key communities around its project sites
through its CSR initiatives including infrastructure development, health,
education and employability enhancement etc.,
2.5% of net profit at the corporate level has been allocated towards CSR
initiatives, for IG3 Infra Limited. The photographs of the CSR activities done in
the previous year has been attached as Figure-4.5 and in Figure-4.6.
FIGURE- 4.5
CSR ACTIVITIES SMART CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE TO
SUNDAKKAMPALAYAM GOVT SCHOOL
FIGURE- 4.6
CSR ACTIVITIES SMART CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE TO
SUNDAKKAMPALAYAM GOVT SCHOOL
The proposed project will adopt the following energy saving measures:
Solar plant of 4 MW has been proposed for common facilities. The plant could
generate 16983 units/day.
Apart from solar plant, Energy efficient fluorescent tube lights & CFL lamps
which give approx. 30% more light output for the same watts consumed and
therefore require less no of fixtures and corresponding lower point wiring
costs.
All fluorescent light fixtures will be specified to incorporate electronic chokes,
which have less watt-loss, compared to electromagnetic chokes and result in
superior operating power factor. Electronic chokes also improve the life of the
fluorescent lamps.
The UPS will be specified with high input power factor (close to unity) so that
input KVA is restricted.
UPS system is proposed with harmonic distortion restricted to less than 5%
compared to far greater than 10% in many conventional UPS systems.
Bus bars in all distribution panels are specified as copper bus bars to reduce
losses and improve reliability.
Copper conductor cables will be specified for sizes of 16-sq.mm and below,
this will reduce losses and improve reliability.
All cables will be de-rated to avoid heating during use. This also indirectly
reduces losses and improves reliability.
Variable frequency drives will be incorporated on motor feeders, which will
save considerable energy.
Power factor of the complete electrical system will be maintained close to
unity. This will reduce electrical power distribution losses in the installation.
An APFC relay based on thyrister switching will be proposed to effect the
power factor correction / improvement within a few cycles of deviation from
the setting & also to reduce inrush currents.
Solar operated pole lights will be proposed to power pathway lights at some
strategic locations.
Presence sensors & daylight sensors will be provided where ever feasible.
Transparent roofs and slits which facilitate the solar light will be in the textile
SEZ to reduce the light usage in day time.
The land area involved has been recognized as SEZ area by MoCI, India.
They have close proximity and synergy with nearby textile cluster & industries
They have a well-established power plant in this area
No forest land is involved;
No crop land or agricultural field are located nearby;
Nearest habitation (Samiarpalayam) is more than 1 km;
The site has near connectivity to raw material suppliers;
Accessibility to Uthukuli railway line and Kochi seaport;
National highway (NH-47) is adjacent to the project site;
Back-up power connectivity from TANGEDCO;
Manpower availability from nearby areas;
No resettlement and rehabilitation issues; and
Absence of areas of archeological and historical importance within 15 km radius
Based on the above criterion, proposed project has been decided to carryout in
this region.
The overall factors makes to carry out the proposed textile SEZ in the area
The Post Project Monitoring to be carried out at the project is discussed below:
Monitoring and Reporting Procedure
Both ambient air quality and stack emissions will be monitored. The ambient air
quality will be monitored once in three months in the work zone, at the DG set
location and surroundings through a reputed environmental laboratory recognized
by CPCB/MoEF. Similarly, the stack monitoring will be carried out once in three
months and the results will be reported to pollution control authorities.
Wastewater Quality
The effluent and sewage emanating from the project will be monitored once in a
month for physico-chemical characteristics.
Noise Levels
Noise levels near the DG sets will be monitored once in three months.
TABLE-6.2
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SCHEDULE DURING CONSTRUCTION
PHASE
Important
Monitoring Duration of
Sr. No Monitoring Location Monitoring
Frequency Sampling
Parameters
A Project Activity : Earth work, development of industrial plots & amenities
I Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Four locations at Once in a 8 hrs PM10, PM2.5,
proposed project site (to month SO2, NO2 and
monitor impacts of CO
proposed construction
activities)
II Ambient Noise Level
Six locations at proposed Once in a Hourly for 24 Sound Pressure
project site (to monitor month hrs Levels, Leq,
impacts of proposed Lmax
construction activities)
III Water Quality
Drainage Outfalls Once in a 24 hr BOD, TSS
(Drainage pipes adjacent month composite
to the development area
will be cleaned of soil
and aggregates)
IV Solid Waste Disposal Mechanism
Project site (Disposal site Daily Twice a day Physical
of construction debris Observation
and cutting material)
V Traffic Monitoring
Near Project Site (to Daily Hourly Vehicle count
monitor impacts of and type
temporary construction
traffic)
VI Occupational Health Twice in a Continuous General Health
and Safety week database aspects
management of
causalities
TABLE-6.4
BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Budgetary allocation
(Rs. In lakhs)
Sr. No Description
O & M cost
Capital cost
per annum
Construction Phase
1 Site Sanitation Facilities 2.0 ---
2 Air Pollution Control Measures 2.5 ---
3 Disinfection & Health Checkup 1.0 ---
4 Greenbelt development 2.0 ---
5 Environmental Monitoring 2.5 ---
Operational Phase
1 Site Sanitation Facilities & others 48.0 8.0
2 Rainwater Harvesting scheme 15.0 1.0
3 Air Pollution Control Measurers 4.0 1.0
4 Disinfection & Health Checkup 2.0 2.0
5 Solid Waste Management 5.0 3.0
6 Greenbelt maintenance --- 2.0
7 Environmental Monitoring --- 10.0
Total 84.0 37.0
Risk analysis involves the identification and assessment of risks the persons
involved in the proposed project and the neighboring populations are exposed to as
a result of hazard occurrence. This requires a thorough knowledge of failure
probability, credible accident scenario, vulnerability of population etc. Much of this
information is difficult to get or generate. Consequently, the risk analysis is often
confined to maximum credible accident studies.
In the sections below, the identification of various hazards, probable risks in the
proposed project, maximum credible accident analysis and consequence analysis,
which give a broad identification of risks involved, are addressed. Based on the risk
estimation for fuel storage, a Disaster Management Plan (DMP) has been presented.
TABLE-7.2
PROPERTIES OF STORAGE FUELS
Chemical/ Codes/Label TLV FBP MP FP UEL LEL
Fuel C %
HSD Flammable 5 mg/m3 369 338 32.96 7.5 0.6
Based on the analysis of past accident information, common causes of accidents are
identified as:
Poor housekeeping;
Improper use of tools, equipment, facilities;
Unsafe or defective equipment facilities;
Lack of proper procedures;
Failure to follow prescribed procedures;
Jobs not understood;
Lack of awareness of involved hazards;
Lack of guides and safety devices; and
Lack of protective equipment and clothing.
Often, human errors are not analyzed while accident reporting and accident reports
only provide information about equipment and/or component failures. Hence, a
great deal of uncertainty surrounds analysis of failure of human systems and
consequent damages.
7.2.1 Introduction
7.2.2 Methodology
An assessment of the conceptual design is conducted for the purpose of identifying
and examining hazards related to utility and support systems, environmental
factors, facilities, and safeguards.
7.2.3 Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA)
A preliminary hazard analysis is carried out initially to identify the major hazards
associated with storages in the proposed project. This is followed by consequence
analysis to quantify these hazards. No major hazards with potential for any
emergency situation exist in the project site. The other hazards related to the
storage areas are given below in Table-7.3 and the preliminary hazard analysis for
the proposed project development is given in Table-7.4.
7.2.4 Maximum Credible Accident Analysis (MCAA)
Hazardous substances may be released as a result of failures or catastrophes,
causing possible damage to the surrounding area.
TABLE-7.3
PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR PROCESS AND STORAGE AREAS
Equipment Process Potential Hazard Provision
Diesel Generator Converts mechanical Mechanical hazards As above
energy into electrical and fire hazards in
energy.
1. Lube oil system
2. Cable galleries
3. Short circuits
Power - Fire and explosion All electrical fittings
Transformers and cables are
provided as per the
specified standards.
TABLE-7.4
PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS IN GENERAL
PHA Description of Recommendation Provision
Category Plausible Hazard
Environ- If there is any - All electrical fittings and
mental leakage and cables will be provided as per
factors eventuality of the specified standards. All
source of ignition. motor starters are flame
proof.
Highly inflammable A well designed fire Fire extinguisher of small size
nature of fuels may protection including and big size are provided at
cause fire hazard in protein foam, dry all potential fire hazard
the storage facility. powder, CO2 places. In addition to the
extinguisher should above, fire hydrant network
be provided. is also provided.
A disastrous situation may arise due to outcome of fire, explosion or toxic hazards in
addition to other natural causes, which eventually lead to loss of life, property and
ecological imbalance. Major hazards posed by flammable storage can be identified
taking recourse to MCA analysis. Depending upon the effective hazardous attributes
and their impact on the event, the maximum effect on the surrounding environment
and the respective damage caused can be assessed.
The results of consequence analysis are useful for getting information about all
known and unknown effects that are of importance when some failure scenario
occurs in the proposed project and also to get information as how to deal with the
possible catastrophic events. It also gives the residents in the project and people
living in the vicinity of the area, an understanding of their personal situation.
Damage Criteria
The Inbuilt storage of HSD in the DG Sets and unloading facility may lead to fire and
explosion hazards. The damage criteria due to accidental release of any
hydrocarbon arise from fire and explosion. The vapors of these fuels are not toxic
and hence no effects of toxicity are expected.
Tank fire will occur if the radiation intensity is high on the peripheral surface of
the tank leading to increase in internal tank pressure. Pool fire will occur when
fuel collected in the dyke due to leakage gets ignited.
Fire Damage
A flammable liquid in a pool will burn with a large turbulent diffusion flame. This
releases heat based on the heat of combustion and the burning rate of the liquid. A
part of the heat is radiated while the rest is convicted away by rising hot air and
combustion products. The radiations can heat the contents of a nearby storage or
process unit to above its ignition temperature and thus result in a spread of fire. The
radiations can also cause severe burns or fatalities of workers or fire fighters located
within a certain distance. Hence, it will be important to know beforehand the
damage potential of a flammable liquid pool likely to be created due to leakage or
catastrophic failure of a storage or process vessel. This will help to decide the
location of other storage vessels and decide the type of protective clothing the
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 128
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific
(Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up
area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi
Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 7
Additional Studies
workers/fire fighters need, the duration of time for which they can be in the zone,
the fire extinguishing measures needed and the protection methods needed for the
nearby storage/process vessels. The damage effects on people and equipment due
to thermal radiation intensity are presented in Tables-7.5 and Table-7.6
respectively.
TABLE-7.5
DAMAGE DUE TO INCIDENT RADIATION INTENSITIES
Sr. Incident Type of Damage Intensity
No. Radiation Damage to Equipment Damage to People
(kW/m2)
1 37.5 Damage to process equipment 100% lethality in 1 min. 1%
lethality in 10 sec.
2 25.0 Minimum energy required to ignite wood 50% Lethality in 1 min.
at indefinitely long exposure without a Significant injury in 10 sec.
flame
3 19.0 Maximum thermal radiation intensity -
allowed on thermally unprotected
adjoining equipment
4 12.5 Minimum energy to ignite with a flame; 1% lethality in 1 min.
melts plastic tubing
5 4.5 - Causes pain if duration is longer
than 20 sec, however blistering
is un-likely (First degree burns)
6 1.6 - Causes no discomfort on long
exposures
Source: Techniques for Assessing Industrial Hazards by World Bank
The effect of incident radiation intensity and exposure time on lethality is given in
Table-7.6.
TABLE-7.6
RADIATION EXPOSURE AND LETHALITY
Radiation Intensity Exposure Time Lethality (%) Degree of Burns
(kW/m2) (seconds)
1.6 -- 0 No Discomfort even
after long exposure
4.5 20 0 1st
4.5 50 0 1st
8.0 20 0 1st
8.0 50 <1 3rd
8.0 60 <1 3rd
12.0 20 <1 2nd
12.0 50 8 3rd
12.5 -- 1 --
25.0 -- 50 --
37.5 -- 100 --
The preliminary risk assessment has been completed for the proposed textile SEZ
and associated facilities:
The hazardous event scenarios and risks in general at this facility can be
adequately managed to acceptable levels by performing the recommended safety
studies as part of detailed design, applying recommended control strategies and
implementing a Safety Management System.
In case of Explosion:
This accident scenario has considerable damage potential. In such scenario the
following steps should be taken:
This accident scenario has considerable damage potential. In such case the
following steps have to be taken up:
Disasters can be divided into two main groups. In the first, disasters resulting
from natural phenomena like earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, storm surges,
cyclones, tropical storms, floods, avalanches, landslides, forest fires etc. The
second group includes disastrous events occasioned by man, or mans impact
upon the environment. Examples are armed conflict, radiation accidents, campus
fires, river pollution, air, sea, rail and road transport accidents and can reach
catastrophic dimensions in terms of human loss.
There can be no set criteria for assessing the gravity of a disaster in the abstract
since this depends to a large extent on the physical, economic and social
environment in which it occurs. What would be considered a major disaster in a
developing country, ill-equipped to cope with the problems involved may not
mean more than a temporary emergency elsewhere.
However, all disaster brings in their wake similar consequences that call for
immediate action, whether at the local, national or international level, for the
rescue and relief of the victims. This includes the search for the dead and injured
and removal of debris and social care, the provision of temporary shelter to the
homeless food, clothing and medical supplies, and the rapid re-establishment of
essential services.
The impact of the proposed project will begin with the starting up of the
construction activities at the site. The proposed construction will provide
employment to considerable number of skilled, semi-skilled and un-skilled
construction labourers. In normal circumstances, the local people will be given
preference for the unskilled activities, as there are many construction laborers in
the vicinity of the project and are expected to be available with normal wages.
The peak labour force required during the construction period will be about 1000
per day and it is anticipated that about two thirds of the labour force will be
sourced from the local area. Provision of wage employment to the local
population during construction period of the project will benefit the local area to
some extent. This will enhance the income levels of the construction labourers
and lead for their socio-economic wellbeing during the construction phase of the
proposed project, which will be positive impact due to the project.
In addition, the real estate in the region will get a boon and the land prices are
likely to shoot-up as part of speculation. Normally, the construction activity will
benefit the local populace in a number of ways, which include the requirement of
skilled, semi-skilled and un-skilled construction labourers, tertiary sector
employment and provision of goods and services for daily needs including
transport. In line with the above, some more recommendations are given below:
8.1.1 Employment
The major benefit due to the proposed project will be in the sphere of generating
temporary employment for substantial number of personnel. The construction
phase of project is expected to span over 18 24 months. Employment for about
100 people will be created by the proposed project during the construction phase,
which will last for over 2 years from the start of project execution activities at
site. These construction workers will be procured from the nearby vicinity to the
extent possible. Hence, the proposed project will benefit locals to a great extent.
IG3 will employ local people to the extent possible. In addition, IG3 will develop
necessary infrastructure like water supply, sewerage, medical facility, etc. for
catering to the needs of the project personnel and their families, which will be
also beneficial to the locals residing in the area.
8.1.3 Transportation
Erection phase of the industrial plots and infrastructure works will involve
movement of material of great magnitude. The material to be transported
includes earthwork, concrete, steel, equipment and other materials. Transport of
construction materials to the project site will result in increased traffic in the
area, which will certainly put additional load on the existing road infrastructure.
Based on the above, it can be said that the proposed project will result in
improving the infrastructure facilities of the area.
8.2.1 Population
During the operational phase, about 2,200 people will be employed. Considering a
family size of 5 persons, there is a likelihood of increase to about 11,000 persons.
Considering that most of the skilled & semiskilled personnel proposed to be
employed for the proposed project would be from outside the study area and
unskilled personnel will be from within the study area. The proposed project
would add to the population in the study area, which would result in better scope
for indirect employment.
8.2.2 Education
8.2.3 Employment
The manpower requirement for the operational phase of the proposed project will
be about 2,200 people. In addition, there will be an indirect employment for
about 3,000 people with implementation of this project.
An employment for about 200 people will be created by the proposed project
during the construction phase, which will last for over two years from the start of
project execution activities at site.
All attempts will be made to employ locally available skilled personnel from the
study area. In case of non-availability of skilled persons, people will be hired from
outside the study area. Requirement of un-skilled / semi-skilled people will be
mostly met from the local population.
8.2.4 Transportation
The major raw materials namely textile raw materials and products will be
transported by road and rail to project site. However, there will also be small
increase in the vehicular traffic (15 trucks, about 20 cars and about 200 - 2/3
wheelers per day) due to passenger/material transport. This increase in traffic
also will not be of any scale of consequence to warrant special mention. One
should expect that the increased passenger/material load in the sector would
prompt the state government to start new and frequent services to this area,
bringing uplift to the whole area.
TABLE-8.1
PROPOSED CSR EXPENDITURES
Investment
Sr. No Activity
(Rs. Lakhs)
1 Potable water supply for Govt. Schools within 10 km 38.0
2 Enhanced library facility for Kasthuripalayam, Uthukuli, 28.0
Govt. schools
3 Infrastructure facilities in pallagounden palayam, 54.0
sundakkampalayam, uthukuli schools
4 Health camp for nearby villages & govt schools in and 18.0
around kasthuripalayam village
5 Improvement of water body in and around uthukuli 39.0
Total 177.0
9.1 Introduction
The Management Action Plan aims at controlling pollution at the source level to
the possible extent with the best available technology followed by treatment
measures before they are discharged to the environment.
The Environmental Management System will enable IG3 to maximize its beneficial
effects and minimize its adverse effects - with emphasis on prevention. It will:
Identify and evaluate the environmental effects arising from the proposed
activities, and services to determine those of significance;
Identify and evaluate the environmental effects arising from incidents,
accidents and potential emergency situations;
Identify the relevant legislative and regulatory requirements;
Enable priorities to be identified and pertinent environmental objectives and
targets to be set;
Facilitate planning, control, monitoring, auditing and review activities to
ensure that the policy is complied with; and
Allow periodic evaluation to suit changing circumstances so that it remains
relevant.
Environmental Policy
The top management will actively initiate, develop and support the environmental
policy, which is relevant to its proposed activities and services at the project and
their environmental effects.
Comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations and apply
responsible standards where laws and regulations do not exist
Encourage concern and respect for the environment, emphasize every
employees responsibility in environmental performance and foster
appropriate operating practices and training
Work with government and industry groups to foster timely development
of effective environmental laws and regulations based on sound science
and considering risks, costs and benefits, including effects on energy and
product supply
FIGURE-9.1
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Manage its business with the goal of preventing incidents and controlling
emissions and wastes to below harmful levels; design, operate and
maintain facilities to this end
Respond quickly and effectively to incidents resulting from its operations,
in co-operation with the industry organizations and authorized government
agencies
Conduct and support research to improve understanding of the impacts of
its business on environment, to improve methods of environmental
protection, and to enhance its capability to make operations and products
compatible with the environment
Communicate with the public on environment matters and share itsw
experience with others to facilitate improvements in industrys
performance
Undertake appropriate reviews and evaluations of its operations to
measure progress and foster compliance with this policy
To facilitate the implementation of the EMS, one of the most important aspects
relate to the organization and personnel. The related issues are:
The areas targeted for improvement will be those where improvements are most
necessary to reduce risks (to environment & the project) and liabilities. These will
be identified through cost-benefit analysis wherever practicable.
Operational Control
IG3 will prepare Environment Management plan (EMP) and establish and maintain
a system of records to demonstrate compliance with the environmental
management systems and the extent of achievement of the environmental
objectives and targets. In addition, the other records (legislative, audit and
review reports) and management records will address the following:
The management audits are to determine whether the activities are conforming
to the environmental management systems and effective in implementing the
Environmental Statement
To identify the areas where resources can be used more efficiently through a
comparison with the figures of a similar project (thereby reducing the
consumption of resources);
To determine the areas where waste generation can be minimized at source
and through end of pipe treatment (thereby reducing the wastes generated
and discharged); and
To initiate a self-correcting/improvement system through an internal analysis
to achieve cost reduction through more efficient practices.
In case the monitored results of environmental pollution are found to exceed the
allowable values, the Environment Management Cell suggests remedial action and
gets these suggestions implemented through the concerned plant authorities. The
actual operation and maintenance of pollution control equipment of each unit is
under the respective plant managers. The Environment Management Cell also co-
ordinates all the related activities such as collection of statistics of health of
workers and population of the region, afforestation and green belt development.
Head of IG3
SEZ Association
Manager Environment /
Environment Engineer / Scientist
FIGURE-9.2
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENT CELL
In fact, presently the project site is a barren land and has no vegetation. With the
proposed extensive green belt and landscaping, the environment within the
premises will definitely improve.
TABLE-10.1
ANTICIPATED ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Constructional Impact
Water Quality Increase in suspended solids Loose soil at During monsoon season run-off from construction site ---
due to soil run-off during heavy construction will be routed to a temporary sedimentation tank for
precipitation site settlement of suspended solids
Air Quality Increase in dust and NOx Vehicular Isolate the construction area with flexible enclosures/ Construction vehicles will
concentration leads to air borne movements, curtains so that the air emissions will not spread in the be maintained properly
diseases excavation surroundings. for reducing air pollution
and leveling levels from vehicle
activity Sprinkling of water in the construction area and unpaved exhausts.
roads. Proper maintenance of vehicles will be done.
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Noise Increase in noise level causes Construction Develop and implement a construction noise Equipment will be kept in
psychological impact in living equipment management plan. good condition to keep
organisms the noise level within 90-
Limit hours of construction where practical. dB (A).
Where blasting occurs, pit shapes and blast campaigns Workers will be provided
will be designed such that the blast faces are oriented with necessary protective
away from noise sensitive receivers. equipment e.g. earplugs,
earmuffs.
Terrestrial Clearing of vegetation Soil enabling Landscaping and extensive plantation will be done Open spaces reserved
Ecology activities will be green turfed and
appropriate type of
plantations will be done
in these parks
Socio- Loss of land and habitation Land The proposed site is presently free from encumbrances, --
economics Acquisition hence private land acquisition and resultant
rehabilitation and resettlement issues are not involved
Excavated Loss of excavated top soil Excavation The topsoil will be properly stored and used for leveling --
Material in the low-lying area. The construction debris will be
used to level the low lying area
Operational Impact
Water Quality Deterioration of surface water Discharge Provide adequate treatment and conditioning facilities so All wastewater generated
quality and ground water from various that the treated sewage and effluent conforms to the from process and
quality sources regulatory standards. domestic will be treated
in ETP & STP
respectively. The treated
water will be utilized for
nourishing greenbelt
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/Coimbatore 149
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific (Textile) Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha
with a build-up area of 2,20,000 sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu
Chapter 10
Summary & Conclusion
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Noise Increase in noise levels from Vehicular Equipment will be designed to conform to noise levels There will be no major
the project movement prescribed by regulatory agencies impacts due to Noise in
and DG sets the project.
operation
Green belt will be
developed all along the
boundary wall for
attenuating the noise
Air Quality Increase in dust and gaseous Vehicular Usage of Bharat-IV/Euro-IV compliant vehicles. The resultant air quality
pollutants in ambient air traffic, Stack will conform to the
emissions Usage of low sulphur fuel for transportation and for DG stipulated standards.
from DG sets sets.
Adequate stack heights
Motorable roads in the project will be paved to reduce will be provided to DG
dust emission. Sets for the proper
dispersion of pollutants
Ensure operational procedures are adequately Emissions from DG sets
implemented and regularly reviewed so as to identify will be controlled to
opportunities for continual improvement. below regulatory
standards
Traffic Impacts Impact on infrastructure and Automobile Improvement of infrastructure, provision of the proper Proper roads will reduce
impact on air quality and noise movement parking yard and evaluate impact of traffic density and the dust emissions to a
levels vehicular emissions. great extent.
Solid waste Impact on human health Domestic All solid waste will be segregated at source and will be -
usage handed over to the authorized disposers. Hazardous
solid waste will be given to secured disposers.
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Demography Strain on existing amenities like Influx of All ultra-modern civic amenities will be provided inside The proposed project
and Socio- housing, water sources and people of the complex would generate
economics sanitation and infrastructure proposed employment both directly
facilities. project. and indirectly.
Terrestrial Impact on plant species Vehicular Greenbelt of 33 ha will be effective in controlling the air As emissions will be
Ecology movement and noise pollution. within limits, no active
and emissions damage to vegetation is
from stack Part of the treated wastewater from domestic uses can expected.
be used for greenbelt development
Storm water Impact on water resources Rain water etc Provide separate storm water drainage network Rainwater will be routed
Control and stored in UG Tanks,
Suitable rain water harvesting structures underground harvesting pits & ponds
tanks, recharge pits, ponds shall be provided
Fire and Safety Accidents / disasters related to Storage of Prepare and implement disaster management plan A well-laid firefighting
fire and safety HSD, system and fire
chemicals, etc extinguishers will be
installed as per fire safety
norms. Regular fire
safety training and mock
drills will also be
conducted.
10.3 Conclusion
The proposed project development has certain level of marginal impacts on the
local environment. However, development of this project has certain beneficial
impact/effects in terms of improving the economy of the state and
socioeconomics of the area during the operational phase of the project.
11.1 Introduction
VIMTA - Environment Division has been in the forefront of its vision to provide
better environment through guiding and assisting the industry for sustainable
development. A stalwart in the mission to protect and preserve the natural
resources on earth for future generations, Vimta offers extensive research and
consultancy services in the field of Environment. With its rich experience, multi-
disciplinary expertise and with the support of its state-of the-art analytical
equipment, the services offered by Vimta are wide ranging and encompasses
entire gamut of Environment Management and Monitoring Services. With its
emphasis on quality services, Vimta, over the years, has evolved itself into a
single reference point in India for Comprehensive Environmental Services.
11.2 The Quality Policy
Spread over the 70,000 Sq.ft lush green garden premises at Cherlapally,
Hyderabad (India), the scientifically designed and meticulously groomed
infrastructural facility of the Central Laboratory of VIMTA has the most
sophisticated instruments backed by an excellent team of professionals. The
40,000 Sq.ft, three-storied, 120 roomed, centrally air conditioned state-of-the-art
Laboratory equipped with Rs.100 million worth analytical instruments and
computerized data management systems, all under one roof is perhaps the only
one of its kind in South Asia in the contract testing and research sector.
Vimta offers various services under the following divisions:
Environment;
Analytical;
Clinical Reference Lab; and
Clinical Research.
The environment division of VIMTA Labs Limited (Vimta) has its presence all over
India including a strong association with international consultants like Japan Bank
for International Cooperation (JBIC), Kennametal Inc. - USA, BBL - UK, Rudal
Blanchard UK, E&E Solutions Japan, NEPESCO & KNPC Kuwait, Marafiq
Saudi Arabia and others. Vimta has the following credentials:
Recognitions by BIS;
Recognitions by Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India;
Recognitions by State Pollution Control Boards (wherever applicable) ;
Recognitions by Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India (NABL) ;
Recognitions by Ministry of Defense, Govt. of India;
Recognitions by APEDA, Ministry of Commerce, Govt. of India;
Recognitions by Saudi Arabia Standard Organization (SASO), Saudi Arabia;
Recognitions from NEMC, Tanzania;
Accreditations by NCTCF;
Certification from Standard Australia;
Recognition from ANVISA Brazil;
Quality Assurance Services as per ISO/IEC 17025; and
Quality Assurance Services as per ICH Guidelines
11.6 Services
Environmental Audits;
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management;
Risk Assessment (MCA,HAZON,HAZOP) & DMP;
Occupational Health and Safety, Industrial Hygiene;
Environmental Monitoring for Air, Meteorology, Water, Soil, Noise, Ecology
and Socio-Economic;
Industrial Emission Source Monitoring;
Offshore Sampling and Analysis of Marine Water and Sediments;
Marine Ecological Studies;
Marine Impact Assessment;
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Studies;
Forestry and Ecological Studies;
Geological and Hydro-geological Studies;
Land Use /Land Cover Studies based on Remote Sensing;
Socio-Economic Studies;
Due Diligence Studies;
Epidemiological Studies;
Wasteland Management Studies; and
Study on Bio-indicators.
11.7 Facilities
The fact that Environment division and its supporting Site Laboratories are
accredited by NABL (IS0-17025) and Ministry of Environment and Forests and by
other international bodies such as Asian Development Bank (ADB) and World
Bank stands testimony to its emphasis on Quality Systems.
11.9 Achievements
Being the first laboratory to be recognized under Environment Protection (EP) Act
by GOI in 1986, Environment Division with its best mind power and industrial
knowledge competency that allows it to compare with the best in the business.
The Environment Division till date has executed about 350 Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environment Management Studies with Risk
Assessment and Disaster Management Plans and obtained statutory
approvals.
Supported by the strong modern laboratory support and experienced hands,
Environment division is well equipped in conducting Due Diligence, Phase-I
and Phase-II studies.
Undertaken specialized studies such as Regional Environmental Impact
Assessment on Carrying Capacity Principle; Upper Air Meteorological studies
using SODAR for major Industrial Complexes.
Associated with prestigious studies such as Environmental Pollution
monitoring around Taj Trapezium, Pre and Post Satellite launch studies for
SHAR, ISRO and monitoring for offshore Oil & Gas exploration for deep-sea
water and sediment sampling.
The services offered include vide spectrum of industries covering Power,
Chemical, Cement, Mining, Steel & Alloys, Metallurgical, Dye & Intermediates,
Bulk Drugs, Pesticides, Agro-Chemicals, Petro-Chemicals, Refineries, Pulp &
Paper, Oil & Gas Exploration & Production, Asbestos, Infrastructure, River
valley, Foundries etc.
The Environment division has also offered its services to major infrastructure
projects such as Ports, Oil & Gas Pipelines, Green field Air Ports, Roads and
Highways.
TABLE-11.1
DETAILS OF PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN CURRENT EIA REPORT
Sr. No. Name Qualification Position Experience
1 Mr. M. Janardhan M.Tech (Env) Head & Vice About 24 years of experience in the field of air quality impacts, and noise,
President(Env) environmental management and environmental engineering
2 Dr. K.S. Muneeswaran M.E. (Env. Engg).,(Ph.D) Senior About 26 years of experience in the field of environmental chemistry and environmental
Manager/Senior impact assessment
Scientist
3 Dr. B. Chandra Sekhar M.Sc, Ph.D Sr. Manager About 14 years of experience in the field of environmental management and modelling
3 Mr. G.V. Raghava Rao M.Tech (Env) Group Leader About 17 years of experience in the field of Environmental Engineering & Management
4 Ms. Durga Bhavani M.Tech (Env) Group leader About 13 years of experience in the field of environmental impact assessment
5 Mr. S. Kishore Kumar M.Tech (Env) Env Engineer About 6 years of experience in the field of Environmental Impact Assessment studies
6 Mr. P.Niranjan Babu B.Com Asst Manager About 23 years of experience in the field of Environmental Monitoring and secretarial
assistance
7 Dr. Subba Reddy M.Sc., Ph.D Scientist About 8 years of experience in the field of Environmental Impact Assessment studies
8 Mr. Rajashekhar M.Sc., Ph.D Ecologist About 10 year of experience in the field of environmental monitoring and
environmental impact assessment
9 Mr. S. Srinivas Goud M.S.W Group Leader About 14 year of experience in the field of social impact assessment
10 Dr. Subba Reddy M.Sc., Ph.D Scientist About 8 years of experience in the field of Environmental Impact Assessment studies
11 Mr. J. Bharatvaj M.E., (Env. Engg) Env. Engineer About 3 year of experience in the field of environmental monitoring and environmental
impact assessment
12 Mr. R. Vignesh M.Tech., (Env. Engg) Env Engineer About 1 year of experience in the field of environmental monitoring and environmental
impact assessment
13 Mr. A. Ashok B.Tech (Biotechnology) Jr. Env. Engineer About 4 year of experience in the field of Environmental Science and monitoring
14 Mr. Ganesan B.Tech (Env.Enginer) Jr. Env. Engineer About 2 year of experience in the field of Environmental Science and monitoring
15 Mr. P. Krishna I.T.I (Civil) Sr. Draftsman About 14 years of experience in the field of Environmental and Civil Drawings
16 Mr. J. Ramakrishna I.T.I (Civil) Sr. Draftsman About 13 years of experience in the field of Environmental and Civil Drawings
Empaneled Experts
1 Mr. J. Rajendra Prasad M.Sc Consultant About 13 years of experience in the field of Remote sensing, Hydrogeology
2 Mr. J. Rajgopal Krishnan M.Tech (Chem. Engg) Consultant About 40 years of experience in the field of risk and hazard assessment
FIGURE -11.1
NABET ACCREDITATION
Executive Summary
1.1 Introduction
As per the EIA Notification dated 14th September 2006, the proposed project falls under
Category B1 under Schedule No. 8(b) [Townships and Area Development
projects], for which Environmental Clearance (EC) from SEIAA is necessary. This
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report is prepared to obtain Environmental
Clearance (EC) from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) of
Tamil Nadu and Consent for Establishment (CFE) from Tamil Nadu Pollution Control
Board (TNPCB).
In-line with the EIA Notification, 76th SEAC meeting was held on 30th June 2016 for
determining TOR for the preparation of EIA report for the proposed project. This EIA has
been prepared based on the TOR conditions stated by SEIAA vide Letter No. SEIAA-
TN/F-4414/2015/ToR-253/SEZ/8(b)/TIR/2016 dated. 11.7.2016.
The details of the environmental setting are given in Table- 1.1. The index map of the
project site is shown in Figure- 1.1. Similarly, the study area map of 10 km radius is
depicted in Figure- 1.2 and Figure-1.3 shows the aerial view of the proposed site.
Executive Summary
TABLE 1.1
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE SITE
Sr.
Particulars Details
No.
1 Site co-ordinates
Latitude Longitude
A 11o 12 36.57 N 77o 26 23.65 E
B 11o 12 53.39 N 79o 27 09.06 E
C 11o 12 21.85 N 79o 27 13.39 E
D 11o 12 06.73 N 79o 26 49.48 E
2 Site Elevation 299 m AMSL
3 Climatic Conditions Annual Max. Temp: 380C
(IMD, Chennai) Annual Min. Temp: 180C
Annual Total Rainfall: 574.3 -mm
4 Land use classification Unclassified as per DTCP
5 Nearest Highway NH-47 (0.7 km, North)
6 Nearest Railway station Uthukuli R.S (5.2 km, South)
7 Nearest airport Coimbatore Airport (48.0 km, ESE)
8 Nearest seaport Kochi Port (189 km, SW)
9 Socio economic factors No resettlement and rehabilitation issues
10 Forest areas Kongampalayam R.F (6.0 km, NNE)
Vayappadi R.F (6.5 km, ESE)
11 Ecologically sensitive Nil within 10 km radius
zones such as Biospheres,
Sanctuaries, National
parks
12 Inland rivers/ water bodies Noyyel River (9.2 km, South)
13 Defense installations/ Nil within 10 km radius
Historical monuments
14 Historical/ Archaeological Nil within 10 km radius
places
15 Nearest habitation Samaiarpalayam (2.2 km, North)
16 Seismicity Zone Zone III as per IS:1893 (Part -1) 2002
17 Nearby Industries Sakthi autocomponents (7.2 km, NE)
Executive Summary
Project Site
FIGURE- 1.1
INDEX MAP OF THE PROJECT SITE
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/ Coimbatore 3
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific (Textile)
Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up area of 2,20,000
sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur
District, Tamil Nadu
Executive Summary
FIGURE-1.2
10 KM RADIUS STUDY AREA MAP OF THE PROJECT SITE
SURVEY OF INDIA TOPOSHEET NO. : 66C/3
Executive Summary
FIGURE- 1.3
AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPOSED SITE
Executive Summary
The details of the proposed project are given in Table-1.2 and Table 1.3.
TABLE-1.2
PROJECT DETAILS
Sr. Area
No. Particulars ha acres (%)
1 Industrial sheds 21.7 53.6 22.3
2 Open parking area 1.0 2.5 1.0
3 Road 5.0 12.4 5.1
4 Green belt area 33.2 82.1 34.1
5 OSR area 9.8 24.2 10.1
6 Solar power plant 5.3 13.1 5.4
7 Warehouses 10.0 24.7 10.3
8 Open area 5.0 12.4 5.1
9 Rainwater harvesting pond 5.0 12.4 5.1
10 ETP, STP, SW Storage 1.5 3.7 1.5
Total 97.5 241 100
Land use Unclassified land use as per DTCP
classification
Total built-up area 2,20,000 sq.m
Building profile Industrial plots Parking area
Common amenities ETP Facility
Cogeneration power STP facility
plant 48 MW Solid waste storage
Greenbelt area
Manpower 2,200 employees including floating population
Parking details Open parking area of 1.0 ha
Water requirement Total Water Requirement 1,047 KLD
Daily make up 127 KLD
Source: New Tiruppur Area Development Corporation Limited
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
The proposed Sector Specific (Textile) SEZ (SEZ) will be developed in 97.54-acres
(241.01 ha) land with 2,20,000 Sq.m built-up area. The proposed project consists of
Industrial sheds, Open parking area, Road, Greenbelt area, OSR Area, ETP, STP, Solid
waste storage area, RWH area and etc. The details of land use of the project are given
in the Table-1.3
TABLE-1.3
DETAILS OF PROPOSED LAND USE
Area
Sr. No. Particulars ha acres (%)
1 Industrial sheds 21.7 53.6 22.3
2 Open parking area 1.0 2.5 1.0
3 Road 5.0 12.4 5.1
4 Green belt area 33.2 82.1 34.1
5 OSR area 9.8 24.2 10.1
6 Solar power plant 5.3 13.1 5.4
7 Warehouses 10.0 24.7 10.3
8 Open area 5.0 12.4 5.1
9 Rainwater harvesting pond 5.0 12.4 5.1
10 ETP, STP, SW Storage 1.5 3.7 1.5
Total 97.5 241 100
The estimated power demand for park usage and industrial plots usage are 0.25 MW &
42.5 MW respectively. The power will be sourced from Thermal Power plant. Incase of
non-operation of power plant, 25 KW of power will be sourced from TANGEDCO. The
distribution system design option is based on safety of personnel, protection of
equipment, cost reliability and flexibility in operation. Proposed scheme will be designed
to be implemented in a single where the entire power distribution infrastructure &
equipment is planned and procured as required.
The power supply will be met from DG Sets during the power failure. The capacity of
the proposed DG sets is 3 x 125 KVA which will fulfill common requirement during the
period of power failure.
The DG sets will be having inbuilt storage of fuel (HSD) and fuel requirement will be
sourced from nearby petrol bunks. DG sets will be housed inside acoustic enclosures to
bring down noise level below permissible limits. Also DG sets are provided with noise
silencers (10- 25 db(A)) and stack of adequate height.
Executive Summary
TABLE-1.4
RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENT & SOURCE
Quantity in Mode of
Activity Raw Material Source
Kg/d transport
Spinning Raw cotton, Wool, 11740 Coimbatore, Erode, By closed
manmade fibre Guntur, Tiruchengode, trucks
Mumbai
Weaving Cotton yarn, 7298 Coimbatore, Erode,
manmade yarn, Rajapalayam, Salem,
silk yarn, wool yarn Mumbai
Garmenting Fabrics (grey and 10621 Coimbatore, Erode,
dyed) Salem
Dyeing Acid dyes, basic 8000 Coimbatore, Erode,
dyes Bangalore, Mumbai
The Project will be developed in phased manner. The peak water demand during the
construction phase will be about 20-m3 /day. The water requirement for the
construction phase will be met from the private water supply agencies.
The total water requirement for the operation phase of the project has been estimated
as 1,407 KLD which is a one-time requirement and daily make up of fresh water is 127
KLD. The water requirement will be met from the The New Tiruppur Area
Development Corporation Limited (NTADCL). The details of water requirement are
given in Table-1.5.
TABLE-1.5
WATER REQUIREMENT
Sr. No Category Quantity in KLD
1 Domestic consumption 97
2 Process
a Dyeing 1,280
b Looming 0.1
c Warping 0.04
d Sizing 30.151
e Secondary warping 0.033
f Garmenting 0.106
Total 1,407
Executive Summary
The facility will provide employment to considerable number of personnel directly and
to many others indirectly. The manpower employed for the proposed textile SEZ during
operation will be about 2,200 persons for direct activities and about 200 for indirect
activities. The details of manpower break-up are given in Table-1.6.
TABLE-1.6
MANPOWER BREAK-UP
Process Description
The Sector Specific (Textile) SEZ will be developed with 26 industrial sheds for various
textile activities such as weaving, warping, sizing, dyeing and garmenting. The flow
chart of textile processing from Yarn cotton to end product is given in Figure-1.4.
1.3.6.1 General
In a cotton textile mill, the carded, combed and spun raw cotton is warped and sized
(slashed) into a mono colour and multi-colour fabrics. All these processes are dry
processes except sizing. The process flow diagram is provided in Figure-1.4.
1.3.6.3 Yarn
Yarn is a long continuous length of interlocked fibres, suitable for use in the production
of textiles, sewing, crocheting, knitting, weaving, embroidery and rope making. Dyed
yarn / Grey yarn received in the form of Cone or Cheese package received from outside
Mills with below specified quantity.
Executive Summary
1.3.6.4 Warping
It is a commonly known fact that fabrics are constructed through two major techniques
weaving and knitting apart from other minor techniques. In these processes, two
distinct sets of yarns called the warp and the weft are interlaced with each other to
form a fabric.
The fabric is separated in two steps of warping, direct warping is mono colour or Grey
fabrics and Sectional warping is Multi colour pattern.
In put material received from stores, this machine application only for multicolor
pattern. Machine having Creel, leasing/ denting head, warping head, waxing head and
weavers beam head with downing / doffing arrangement. Input dyed yarn packages
mounting in creel against fabric pattern, Leasing / denting devices will helps to
separating the yarn, Waxing device will helps to coating lubrication, Section Head will
helps to groping the yarn against pattern, Finally beaming Head produce required warp
sheet and wound on weavers beam for weaving, 4 Nos of Direct warping machine
launching for feeding 420 Looms
In put material received from stores, this application only for Mono color or Grey
fabrics. Machine having Creel, leasing/denting head, warping head with downing/doffing
arrangement. Input grey yarn packages mounting in creel against fabric width, Leasing
/ denting devices will helps to separating the yarn, Beam Head will helps to groping the
yarn against width of fabric, beaming Head produce required warp sheet and wound on
wrappers beam for sizing, 2 Nos of Direct warping machine launching for feeding 420
Looms
1.3.6.7 Sizing
Sizing of the warp yarn is essential to reduce breakage of the yarn and thus production
stops on the weaving machine. The yarn is seized with starch and Poly Vinyl Alcohol
(PVA) or Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) to give necessary tensile strength and
smoothness required for weaving.
Executive Summary
1.3.6.8 Looms
A loom is a device used to weave cloth. The basic purposes of any loom are to hold the
warp threads under tension to facilitate the interweaving of the weft threads. Warp yarn
& weft yarn interlacement process done in Dobby/Jacquard looms
1.3.6.9 Inspections
The cloth Roll is received from looms and the grade is inspected and the inspected cloth
bundles are sending to processing unit.
1.3.6.10 Garments
Processed cloth bundles received from processing unit and confection process done in
Garment section.
Finally the quality and quantity is inspected and the finished goods are packed and
dispatched
Executive Summary
Yarn
Sec.Warp Dir.
ing Warping
Sizing
Looms
Inspections
Processing send to
outside
Garments
Final Inspection
Finished Goods
Dispatch
FIGURE- 1.4
PROCESS FLOW CHART
Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad/ Coimbatore 29
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Sector Specific (Textile)
Special Economic Zone in a plot area of 97.54 ha with a build-up area of 2,20,000
sq.m at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur
District, Tamil Nadu
Executive Summary
The wastewater generation of the proposed project is about 1380 KLD which includes
sewage and the effluent. The generated wastewater from process and domestic will be
treated in proposed ETP (1750 KLD) and in STP (275 KLD) respectively. The wastewater
generation is provided in Table-1.7.
TABLE-1.7
WASTEWATER GENERATION (SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT)
Sr. No Category Quantity in KLD
1 Sewage 92
2 Process
a Dyeing 1258.2
d Sizing 30.09
Total 1380.3
The treated wastewater of 1250-KLD from ETP will be utilized again for process and
cleaning purposes. Treated water from STP of about 92 KLD will be used for sizing,
warping & nourishing greenbelt maintenance.
The baseline environmental monitoring studies were carried out to determine the
conditions of various environmental attributes from 1st June 2016 to 31st August 2016 in
the 10 km radius study area around the proposed site.
The land use pattern of the study area has been studied by analyzing the available
secondary data published in the District Primary Census abstract of the year 2011. In
addition to the establishment of land use pattern based on the review of secondary
data, the land use pattern in study area and its buffer zones covered within a radius of
10 km from the proposed development has been established through interpretation of
satellite imageries and by means of preparation of land use/land cover map.
1.4.2 Meteorology
TABLE-1.8
RESULTS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA GENERATION
Results
Sr. No. Parameter
Maximum Minimum
1. Temperature (oC) 35 23
2. Humidity (%) 94 27
Executive Summary
To establish the baseline status of the ambient air quality in the study area, the air
quality was monitored at 8 locations. The summary of the Ambient Air Quality monitored
is given in Table-1.9.
TABLE- 1.9
SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IN THE STUDY AREA
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx CO
Maximum
Samiarpalayam Attupakkam Samiarpalayam Samiarpalayam Samiarpalayam
(AAQ3) (AAQ4) (AAQ3) (AAQ3) (AAQ3)
49.5 17.2 11.6 17.3 352
Minimum
Virumandapalayam Virumandapalayam Chamrajpalayam Chamrajpalayam Project site
(AAQ8) (AAQ8) (AAQ5) (AAQ5) (AAQ1)
32.4 5.9 5.0 10.0 203
All Concentrations are expressed in g/m3
The concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX and CO are observed to be well within the
standards prescribed by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for Industrial, Rural,
Residential and other area. Other parameters including Ozone (O3), Ammonia (NH3), Lead
(Pb), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni), Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) & Mercury (Hg) are
found to exist below detectable limits.
The noise monitoring has been conducted for determination of ambient noise levels at ten
locations in the study area. The observations are given in Table- 1.10.
TABLE- 1.10
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Six ground water samples and two surface water samples within the study area were
considered for assessment. Th results of the surface water and groundwater complied
with the limits of IS: 10500 for drinking water and water source for absence of alternate
source. The results of the analyses are given in Table- 1.11.
Executive Summary
TABLE- 1.11
WATER QUALITY RESULTS
Sr.
Parameter Unit Surface Water Ground Water
No.
1. pH - 7.0 - 7.8 7.6- 7.8
2. Total Hardness mg/l 169 - 735 363- 478
3. Total Dissolved mg/l 294 - 392 741- 976
Solids
4. Chlorides mg/l 16.9 - 73.5 36.3- 47.8
5. Fluorides mg/l 0.2 - 0.6 0.1- 0.2
6. Nitrates mg/l 9.3 - 42.5 12.3- 18.2
7. Coliform Bacteria MPN/100 Nil Nil
8. Heavy Metals mg/l Below Detectable Below Detectable
Limits Limits
The details of the soil quality in the study area are laid down in Table- 1.12 and
classified according to standard soil classification by ICAR. It has been observed that
the light brown coloured sandy loam was observed in the study area.
TABLE- 1.12
SOIL QUALITY
Sr.
Parameter Observed Values
No.
1 pH 7.3 - 7.7
2 Bulk density (g/cm3) 1.1 - 1.4
3 Electrical conductivity (s/cm) 167 - 361
4 Organic matter (%) 0.9 1.8
5 Nitrogen (kg/ha) 146 165
6 Phosphorus (kg/ha) 9.5- 13.4
7 Potassium (kg/ha) 210 - 324
It has been observed that the texture of soil is mostly Sandy Loam in the study area.
The common color of the soil is light brown. It has been observed that the pH of the soil
quality ranged from 7.3 7.7, indicating that the soil is usually neutral to slightly
alkaline in nature. The bulk density of soil ranges in between 1.2 1.5.
The Electrical Conductivity was observed to be in the range of 167 - 361 S/cm, with
the maximum (361) observed in the Chengapalli (S6) and with the minimum (167)
observed in Samiarpalayam (S3).
The Organic matter ranged between 0.9-1.8 percent. The maximum Percentage (1.8%)
was found to be in the village of Tenmugam Kangeyampalayam (S2) indicating that the
organic carbon is having more than sufficient Percentage. The minimum Percentage
(0.9%) was observed in Sottakavundanpalayam (S4) indicating that the organic carbon
has Sufficient Percentage.
Executive Summary
The Nitrogen values ranged between 149-165 kg/ha. The maximum value (165) was
found to be in the village of Chengapalli (S6) indicating that the soil is having Good
quantity of Nitrogen. The minimum value (149) was observed in Aruvangattupalayam
(S2) indicating that the soil has Good quantity of Nitrogen.
The Phosphorus values range in between 9.5 13.4 kg/ha. The maximum value (13.4)
was found in the chengapalli (S6) and the minimum value (9.5) was observed in the
proposed project site (S1) indicating that the soil has very less quantity of
Phosphorus.
The Potassium values range in between 185 - 305 kg/ha. The maximum value (13.4)
was found in the proposed project site (S1) and the minimum value (9.5) was observed
in sottakavundamapalayam (S4) indicating that the soils in the area have medium
quantity of Potassium.
From the field observations it can be concluded that the forests in the study area are
under anthropogenic pressure and show signs of degradation in the form of tree
cutting, lopping, grazing and collection of NTFPs and habitat fragmentation. As per
MOEF and Forest Department of Tamil Nadu state reveals that there are no Wildlife
sanctuaries, National parks/biosphere reserves in 10 km radius from the proposed
project site boundary. As per the records of the Botanical Survey of India there are no
plants of conservation importance in the study area.
It can be concluded that there is one species belonging to 4 species of Sch-II (cobra, coral
snake, viper & pit viper) and rest of species belongs Sch-III, Sch-IV and Sch-V of Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972. As of now, no specific conservation action plan is required,
however Schedule II and III mammal like Hyeana hyeana (Hyeana) and other schedule
IV birds are protected by the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. All the wildlife
above listed will be protected by the district Wildlife authorities as per Indian Wildlife
(Protection) Act, 1972 and state government conservation rules.
As per 2011 census the population of the study area consists of 2,99,284 persons. Both
males and females constitute 50% to the study area population respectively. The
average household size of the study area is 4 persons. In the study area, 42% of the
population belongs to Scheduled Castes (SC). The study area experiences average
literacy rate of 72%. As per 2011 census records, the main workers comprise 44% of
the total population. The marginal workers and non-workers constitute 3% and 51% of
the total population respectively.
The environmental impacts during the erection stage will be short term, temporary in
nature and will be confined very close to the project site.
Executive Summary
There is no forest land or ecological sensitive land within proposed project site. Hence,
no major impact on land use is envisaged.
Impact on Soil
The construction activities will result in loss of some vegetation cover, topsoil and earthen
material to some extent in the plant area. However, it is proposed to use the soil and
earthen material for greenbelt development and levelling of project site. Apart from
localized construction impacts at the project site, no adverse impacts on soil in the
surrounding area are anticipated.
The main sources of emission during the erection period are the movement of equipment
at site and dust emitted during the levelling, grading, earthwork, foundation works.
Exhaust emissions from vehicles and equipment deployed during the construction phase is
also likely to result in marginal increase in the levels of SO2, NOx, PM and CO. The impact
will, however, be reversible, marginal and temporary in nature.
The initial erection works at the project site involves land clearance. The removal of
vegetation from the soil and loosening of the topsoil generally causes soil erosion.
However, such impacts will be confined to the project site and will be minimized through
paving and water sprinkling. No major impacts are envisaged on terrestrial ecology.
Socio-Economic Impacts
Services of skilled and unskilled workers of different trades are required in large numbers.
The project will provide either direct or indirect job opportunities to the local population as
far as possible. These earnings are likely to change the economic status of local people.
Impact on Soil
Most of the impacts of proposed project on soils are restricted to the construction phase,
which will get stabilized during operational phase. The impact on the topsoil will be
confined to the project area as all the activities are limited within the project site boundary
only.
The impact on air quality is assessed based on emissions of the proposed project site.
Particulate Matter (PM10), Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) will be
the important pollutants emitting from the proposed expansion. The maximum resultant
ground level concentrations of PM10, SO2 and NOx are given in Table-1.10. Cumulative
concentration of pollutants due to the nearby industries are given in Table-1.11.
Executive Summary
TABLE-1.13
RESULTANT CONCENTRATIONS DUE TO INCREMENTAL GLCs
The total water requirement for the project has been estimated to be 1,407 KLD which
is a one-time requirement and daily fresh water make up of 127 KLD will be met
through New Tiruppur Area Development Corporation Limited (NTADCL).
The wastewater generated from industrial units with activities such as dyeing and sizing
activities shall be treated in the effluent treatment plant of capacity 1750 KLD and the
sewage generated from industrial plots will be treated in Sewage Treatment Plant of
275 KLD capacity respectively. The treated water from ETP shall be reused for dyeing
process and the treated sewage will be re-used for process such as warping, looming &
greenbelt. No wastewater will be discharged outside the premise.
TABLE-1.14
WASTEWATER GENERATION (SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT)
The source, quantity of solid wastes generated and the corresponding waste management
measures are presented in Table- 1.15.
Executive Summary
During operational phase of the project, considerable quantities of solid wastes from
process and domestic use be generated. If the solid wastes are not disposed-off
efficiently, these may cause for environmental degradation.
The solid waste generated from the textile SEZ are classified to process waste and
domestic waste. In domestic waste, source segregation is proposed with common
collection and disposal, using color coded bins positioned at each plots. The
biodegradable wastes shall be collected, segregated and composted within the project
premise. Sludge generated from STP of quantity 0.9 TPD and horticulture waste, such
as dried leaves, flowers etc. shall be utilized as manure for greenbelt
TABLE- 1.15
SOLID WASTE GENERATION
Quantity Waste management
Sr. No Solid waste
(TPD) measures
Hazardous Process Waste
1 CETP Sludge 1.6 Will collected and given to
2 Waste salt from MEE 0.4 TMWML, Gummidipoondi
Non-hazardous Process Waste
1 Cloth wastes 0.57 Re-used again in process
2 End bits 0.23
Municipal Solid waste
1 Biodegradables (60%) 0.26 Composting
2 Non-biodegradables 0.18 Will be given to authorized
(40%) centres
3 STP Sludge 0.9 Dried and re-used as manure
for greenbelt
The process waste shall be again categorized into hazardous and non-hazardous waste.
Non-hazardous process waste such as end bits, cuttings shall be reused again in
process. Hazardous process waste such as MEE salt, ETP sludge, RO reject, Solar bed
residue, used oil shall be collected & stored in dykes, PE bags & barrels. Adequate solid
waste storage area of 1.5 ha has been allocated in the project premise and the waste
shall be kept with accordance to the material compatibility. The stored waste shall be
periodically disposed to secured disposal centre authorized by CPCB/ TNPCB. Hence, the
generation of solid wastes in the proposed project development will not create adverse
impacts.
Impact on Ecology
The impacts on aquatic ecology due to proposed expansion activity would be negligible as
no wastewater is discharged outside the premise.
The forest blocks are found within the study area are more than 5.0 km away from the
project site. Hence no impact is envisaged
Executive Summary
It was observed from the proposed development, noise levels ranging between 60 64
dB (A) and it will be limited to work zone only. At the corners of the plant boundary,
noise levels will be varying between 44 dB (A) to 46 dB (A).
The discharge of waste materials (stack emission, wastewater and solid wastes) from
process operations can have potential impact on public safety and health. The impact
from the discharge of waste products is not expected to be significant since, the
adverse impacts on ambient air, water and soil quality are predicted to be low.
The Environmental Management Plan that is proposed to be carried out during the
erection and operation phase of the proposed project is presented in Table- 1.13 and
1.14 respectively.
Executive Summary
TABLE-1.16
ANTICIPATED ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Constructional Impact
Water Quality Increase in suspended solids Loose soil at During monsoon season run-off from construction site ---
due to soil run-off during heavy construction will be routed to a temporary sedimentation tank for
precipitation site settlement of suspended solids
Air Quality Increase in dust and NOx Vehicular Isolate the construction area with flexible enclosures/ Construction vehicles will
concentration leads to air borne movements, curtains so that the air emissions will not spread in the be maintained properly
diseases excavation surroundings. for reducing air pollution
and leveling levels from vehicle
activity Sprinkling of water in the construction area and unpaved exhausts.
roads. Proper maintenance of vehicles will be done.
Executive Summary
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Noise Increase in noise level causes Construction Develop and implement a construction noise Equipment will be kept in
psychological impact in living equipment management plan. good condition to keep
organisms the noise level within 90-
Limit hours of construction where practical. dB (A).
Where blasting occurs, pit shapes and blast campaigns Workers will be provided
will be designed such that the blast faces are oriented with necessary protective
away from noise sensitive receivers. equipment e.g. earplugs,
earmuffs.
Terrestrial Clearing of vegetation Soil enabling Landscaping and extensive plantation will be done Open spaces reserved
Ecology activities will be green turfed and
appropriate type of
plantations will be done
in these parks
Socio- Loss of land and habitation Land The proposed site is presently free from encumbrances, --
economics Acquisition hence private land acquisition and resultant
rehabilitation and resettlement issues are not involved
Excavated Loss of excavated top soil Excavation The topsoil will be properly stored and used for leveling --
Material in the low-lying area. The construction debris will be
used to level the low lying area
Operational Impact
Water Quality Deterioration of surface water Discharge Provide adequate treatment and conditioning facilities so All wastewater generated
quality and ground water from various that the treated sewage and effluent conforms to the from process and
quality sources regulatory standards. domestic will be treated
in ETP & STP respectively.
The treated water will be
utilized for nourishing
greenbelt
Executive Summary
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Noise Increase in noise levels from Vehicular Equipment will be designed to conform to noise levels There will be no major
the project movement prescribed by regulatory agencies impacts due to Noise in
and DG sets the project.
operation
Green belt will be
developed all along the
boundary wall for
attenuating the noise
Air Quality Increase in dust and gaseous Vehicular Usage of Bharat-IV/Euro-IV compliant vehicles. The resultant air quality
pollutants in ambient air traffic, Stack will conform to the
emissions Usage of low sulphur fuel for transportation and for DG stipulated standards.
from DG sets sets.
Adequate stack heights
Motorable roads in the project will be paved to reduce will be provided to DG
dust emission. Sets for the proper
dispersion of pollutants
Ensure operational procedures are adequately Emissions from DG sets
implemented and regularly reviewed so as to identify will be controlled to
opportunities for continual improvement. below regulatory
standards
Traffic Impacts Impact on infrastructure and Automobile Improvement of infrastructure, provision of the proper Proper roads will reduce
impact on air quality and noise movement parking yard and evaluate impact of traffic density and the dust emissions to a
levels vehicular emissions. great extent.
Solid waste Impact on human health Domestic All solid waste will be segregated at source and will be -
usage handed over to the authorized disposers. Hazardous
solid waste will be given to secured disposers.
Executive Summary
Probable
Discipline Potential Negative Impacts Mitigative Measures Remarks
Sources
Demography Strain on existing amenities like Influx of All ultra-modern civic amenities will be provided inside The proposed project
and Socio- housing, water sources and people of the complex would generate
economics sanitation and infrastructure proposed employment both directly
facilities. project. and indirectly.
Terrestrial Impact on plant species Vehicular Greenbelt of 33 ha will be effective in controlling the air As emissions will be
Ecology movement and noise pollution. within limits, no active
and emissions damage to vegetation is
from stack Part of the treated wastewater from domestic uses can expected.
be used for greenbelt development
Storm water Impact on water resources Rain water etc Provide separate storm water drainage network Rainwater will be routed
Control and stored in UG Tanks,
Suitable rain water harvesting structures underground harvesting pits & ponds
tanks, recharge pits, ponds shall be provided
Fire and Safety Accidents / disasters related to Storage of Prepare and implement disaster management plan A well-laid firefighting
fire and safety HSD, system and fire
chemicals, etc extinguishers will be
installed as per fire safety
norms. Regular fire
safety training and mock
drills will also be
conducted.
Executive Summary
The development has already allotted 33.2 ha (34.1%) of greenbelt of the total project
area fulfilling CPCB norms.
The existing EMP measures have been established and also being maintained with the
capital cost of Rs. 84 lakhs and a recurring cost of Rs. 37 lakhs/annum
The land area involved has been recognized as SEZ area by MoCI, India.
They have close proximity and synergy with nearby textile cluster & industries
They have a well-established power plant in this area
No forest land is involved;
No crop land or agricultural field are located nearby;
Nearest habitation (Samiarpalayam) is more than 1 km;
The site has near connectivity to raw material suppliers;
Accessibility to Uthukuli railway line and Kochi seaport;
National highway (NH-47) is adjacent to the project site;
Back-up power connectivity from TANGEDCO;
Manpower availability from nearby areas;
No resettlement and rehabilitation issues; and
Absence of areas of archeological and historical importance within 15 km radius
Based on the above criterion, proposed project has been decided to carryout in this
region.
An effective Disaster Management Plan (DMP) to mitigate the risks involved has been
prepared. This plan defines the responsibilities and resources available to respond to
the different types of emergencies envisaged. Training exercises will be held to ensure
that all personnel are familiar with their responsibilities and that communication links
are functioning effectively.
Executive Summary
The manpower for the proposed textile SEZ during operational period is estimated to be
about 2200 persons in addition to the existing manpower.
As part of the Corporate Social Responsibility, IG3 proposes to take steps in developing
education, health, infrastructure development, women empowerment, sports and
vocational training facilities. These will be taken up as part of social development of the
neighboring villages. The proposed CSR expenditures amount to 2.5% of the project
cost fulfilling the norms of the companies act and MoEF norms. The proposed activities
and expenditures are provided in Table-1.17.
TABLE-1.17
PROPOSED CSR EXPENDITURES
Investment
Sr. No Activity
(Rs. Lakhs)
1 Potable water supply for Govt. Schools within 10 km 38.0
2 Enhanced library facility for Kasthuripalayam, Uthukuli, 28.0
Govt. schools
3 Infrastructure facilities in pallagounden palayam, 54.0
sundakkampalayam, uthukuli schools
4 Health camp for nearby villages & govt schools in and 18.0
around kasthuripalayam village
5 Improvement of water body in and around uthukuli 39.0
Total 177.0
1.12 Conclusion
The proposed expansion of the textile SEZ has certain level of marginal impacts on the
local environment. However, development of this project has certain beneficial
impact/effects in terms of bridging the textile product demand and supply gap and
providing employment opportunities that will be created during the course of its setting
up and as well as during the operational phase of the entire project.
Sr.
Queries Reply
No
1 Letter from the competent Authority The letter from the competent authority is
endorsing the claim that the location attached as Annexure-IV.
of the proposed plant is away from
the notified critically polluted areas
as identified by MOEF & CC, GOI,
shall be furnished.
2 Affidavit stating that :-
i The Effluent Treatment Plant will be The affidavit was enclosed as Annexure-V.
provided individually by alloted units in
the proposed Textile SEZ to achive ZLD.
ii No CETP for process effluent will be Undertaking conferring No CETP installation
proposed / provided in the SEZ. In the in the SEZ area has been attached as
event of such a proposal category and Annexure-V.
schedule no. Of project will be changed
and fresh appraisal by SEAC shall be
made.
3 The nature and operations The nature and activity of the units is
(Dyeing/non-dyeing) of the provided in Chapter-2, Page No.14.
industries in the proposed Textile
SEZ with the breakup details of their The breakup details of the effluent
effluent generation, pre-treatment, generation in Table-2.7, Page No. 25;
etc. breakup of individual units contributing to
the generation is provided as Annexure-
XIX.
ANNEXURE-I
8(b): Standard Terms of reference for conducting Environment Impact Assesment
study for Township/ Area Developement Projects and information to be included in
EIA/EMP report.
1 Examine details of Land use as Per The land use as per the master plan are
Master Plan and land use around 10 km provided in Chapter-2, Table No. 2.1, Page
radius of the project site. Analysis should No. 13.
be made based on latest satellite
imagery for land use with raw images. The land use as per the satellite imagery
Check on flood plain of any river. based on IRS P6 LISS-IV-5m are provided in
Chapter-3, Table-3.25, Page No. 84.
2 Submit details of environmentally There is no sensitive places in the study
sensitive places, land acquisition status, area with respect to the proposed project.
rehabiliation of communities / villages The environmental status of the study area
and present status of such activities. has provided in Chapter-1, Table no. 1.2,
Page no. 9.
3 Products and capacities. If expansion The products and capacities are provided in
proposal then exixting products with Chapter-2, section 2.4, Page No. 22
capacities and reference to earlier EC.
4 Requirement of land, raw material, All the details are in provided in Chapter-2
water, power, fuel, with source of supply
(Quantitative). Land section 2.3, Page no. 13,14
Raw material section 2.4, Page No. 22
Water section 2.8, Page No. 23-24
Power section 2.5.4, Page No. 21,22
No fuel is used other than diesel which will
be used only during power failure
5 Process discription in brief, specifically The process description in bried are provided
Indicating the gaseous emission, liquid in Chapter 2, section 2.4, Page No. 14-17.
effluent and soil and hazardous wastes. The industry is predominatly water intensive
consumer and it generates predominantly a
wastewater than gaseous emissions. The
wastewater in regard to the concerned
process are provided in Chapter-2, Figure-
2.4, Page BChapter-3, Section 3.11, Page
No.89-92 & Chapter-4, section 4.3.9, Page
no. 107. Figure 2.4, Page No. 24.
6 Measures for mitigating the impact on The environment management and
the environment and mode of discharge mitigation plans and mitigation measures for
or disposal. construction and operational phases are in
Chapter-4, Page No. Section 4.5, Page No.
109-114.
7 Capital cost of the project, estimated The capital cost is 70.93 crores. 24 months
time of completion. years after obtaining prior approval from
concerned authorities
8 Site selected for the project Nature of The land area proposed for the development
land Agricultural (single/double crop), is categorized as unclassified land by DTCP.
barren, Govt/ private land, status of is The environmental setting of the proposed
acqisition, nearby (in 2-3 km.) water project is provided in Chapter-1, Table-1.2,
body, population, with in 10 km other Page No. 9.
industries, forest, eco-sensitive zones,
accessibility, (note- in case of industrial
estate the information may not be
necessary).
9 Baseline Environmental datas air quality, The baseline landuse studies are provided in
surface and ground water quality, soil Chapter-3, Section 3.9, Page No. 80-85
charecteristic flora and fauna, socio
economic condition of the nearby The baseline groundwater details of the
population. proposed project are provided in Chapter-3,
Section 3.6.2, Page No. 59- 63 and surface
water details are provided in Section 3.6.2,
Page No. 64-65.
10 Identification of hazard in handling, The brief details about hazards are provided
processing and storage of hazardous in Chapter-7.
material and safety system provided to
mitigate the risk.
11 Likely impact of the project on air, water, There is a marginal impacts on air, water,
land, flora-fauna and near by population land and in fauna
12 Emergency preapredness Plan in case of The emergency preparedness are provided
natural or in plant emergencies in Chapter-7, section 7.3.5, Page No. 130-
131
13 Issues raised during public hearing (if Public hearing is not needed as the project is
applicable ) and response given. categorized under Schedule No. 8(b)
[Townships and Area Development projects],
Category. B1.
14 CSR plan with proposed expenditure. CSR and proposed expenditure are
presented in Chapter-8, section 8.2.5, Page
No. 136-137.
15 Occupational Health Measures. Occupational health measures during
construction phase will carried out by
developer and in the operation phase, the
industrial plots will be carrying the
responbsibility.
16 Post project monitoring plan. Post project monitoring plan are presented
in Chapter-6, section 6.4, Page No. 123-124.
Besides the above, the below mentioned general points should also be followed:-
a A note confriming complaince of the The cross referencing of the relevant
TOR, with cross referencing of the sections has been done
relevent sections / pages of the EIA
report should be provided.
b All documents may be properly Complied
referenced with index, page numbers
and continous page numbering.
c Copy of permission related to port Not applicable.
facility, Desalination plant, wind mill /
solar power plant from competent
Authority.
d Where data are presented in the report Complied
especially in tables, the period in which
the data are collected and the sourced
should be indicated.
e While preparing the EIA report, the Complied
instructions for the proponents and
instructions for the consultants issued by
MoEF vide O.M. No, J-11013/41/2006-
IA.II(I) dated 4th August, 2009, which
are available on the website of this
Ministry should also be followed.
f The consultants involved in the Disclosure of consultant along with the
preparations of EIA / EMP report after accreditation has been provided in Chapter-
COMPLIANCE REPORT
TERMS OF REFERENCE ISSUED BY SEIAA, TAMILNADU
LR. NO. SEIAA,TN/F4414/2015/TOR 253/SEZ/8b/TIR/2016 dt. 11.07.2016
%sk aum0tlm
-SM
1A.8.9
u4W. SeTU pm:
UNDERTAKING
involved in
I, A. Subramanian Senior Vice-President, MIs. 1G3 Infra Limited
Nadu for the
the process of obtaining environmental clearance from SETAA, Tamil
Avinashi Taluk,
proposed textile SEZ at Vadamugam Kangeyampalayam Village,
categorized as
Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu. The proposed project has been
Projects), Category 81
I Schedule. 8(b) (Townships and Area development affirm and furnishing the
under EIA Notification 2006. I hereby solemnly
1 following undertaking to the Authority.
involved in the
I I undertake and commit to the SEIAA I TN that the land area
sq.m. The
proposed development is 97.5 ha with the buildup area of 2,20,000
textile
proposed development houses 26 industrial sheds to carry out various
Fo 103 Infra Ljmitecl
I
Ruthor -rd S;nrahr,
I
processing activities viz., weaving, warping, sizing, dyeing and garmenting. The
land involved in the proposed textile SEZ has been already notified as sector
specific special economic zone for textile processing by Ministry of Commerce
and Industry.
Furthermore, the occupier in the textile SEZ portion will separately manage their
effluents efficiently to ensure Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) in the project premise
& no Common Effluent Treatment Plant Facility will be made without the
knowledge of SEIAA, Tamil Nadu as well.
The textile SEZ will adhere to Zero Liqilid Discharge system and no
wastewater will be discharged outside the project premise
I am aware that I can be prosecuted under the relevant Act and Rules, if I am not
ensuring the adherence of the above undertaking. Rather
Undertaking signed by me on 14th day of Dec 2016. ltd
Vu. .
p
Sipflat0fl
AuthonscCi
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-1
Location : Proposed plant site (AAQ1)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 41.6 13.7 8.5 10.9 236 256 264
02.06.2016 38.0 12.5 8.1 11.5 241 297 249
03.06.2016 39.3 13.0 7.6 13.2 229 284 265
04.06.2016 41.7 13.8 8.4 11.1 252 293 267
06.06.2016 41.8 13.8 8.8 11.4 242 223 260
07.06.2016 41.1 13.6 8.0 13.4 213 215 256
08.06.2016 39.2 12.9 10.4 10.1 267 249 256
09.06.2016 38.8 12.8 7.9 13.6 249 265 271
01.07.2016 41.1 13.6 8.8 12.4 245 296 258
02.07.2016 40.4 13.3 8.2 11.8 249 236 265
04.07.2016 38.9 12.8 8.1 12.8 256 247 265
05.07.2016 40.1 13.2 9.2 13.5 261 294 255
06.07.2016 38.7 12.8 7.9 13.8 217 287 259
07.07.2016 36.9 12.2 8.0 13.2 261 287 261
08.07.2016 37.9 12.5 8.8 13.8 287 244 258
09.07.2016 38.7 12.8 10.4 12.2 261 255 244
01.08.2016 41.2 13.6 8.7 13.2 261 244 255
02.08.2016 41.6 13.7 9.2 11.2 261 249 255
03.08.2016 38.9 12.8 10.4 13.9 249 203 277
04.08.2016 39.3 13.0 8.5 12.8 258 255 244
05.08.2016 38.2 12.6 8.9 13.4 244 282 261
06.08.2016 39.7 13.1 9.2 13.7 255 249 261
08.08.2016 42.2 13.9 10.4 13.3 203 255 261
09.08.2016 40.8 13.5 8.2 11.9 287 246 261
10.08.2016 38.6 12.7 8.6 11.1 244 287 249
11.08.2016 38.2 12.6 8.8 13.2 253 244 249
Maximum 42.2 13.9 10.4 13.9 297
Minimum 36.9 12.2 7.6 10.1 203
Average 39.7 13.1 8.8 12.5 256
98 %tile 42.0 13.9 10.4 13.9 295
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
1
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-2
Location : Aruvangattupalayam (AAQ2)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 42.2 13.9 8.4 11.1 259 300 253
02.06.2016 38.5 12.7 9.5 11.5 268 284 243
03.06.2016 39.8 13.1 7.5 13.7 259 284 259
04.06.2016 42.3 13.9 8.2 11.1 284 262 243
06.06.2016 42.3 14.0 9.2 11.4 259 243 249
07.06.2016 41.7 13.7 7.9 13.9 259 256 253
08.06.2016 39.7 13.1 7.4 11.2 243 250 253
09.06.2016 39.3 13.0 7.8 13.8 249 300 243
01.07.2016 41.7 13.7 7.5 12.3 255 253 249
02.07.2016 41.0 13.5 8.1 11.7 248 261 259
04.07.2016 39.4 13.0 8.0 12.7 253 273 259
05.07.2016 40.7 13.4 9.1 13.5 300 279 264
06.07.2016 39.2 12.9 7.8 13.7 284 255 259
07.07.2016 37.4 12.3 9.5 14.0 242 284 249
08.07.2016 38.4 12.7 8.7 13.5 255 243 273
09.07.2016 39.2 12.9 9.4 13.7 253 253 261
01.08.2016 41.7 13.8 8.6 13.2 273 253 243
02.08.2016 42.1 13.9 9.1 13.7 258 253 249
03.08.2016 39.5 13.0 9.2 13.4 264 259 253
04.08.2016 39.8 13.1 8.4 11.2 284 284 284
05.08.2016 38.7 12.8 8.8 13.4 273 259 284
06.08.2016 40.2 13.3 9.1 11.3 259 243 253
08.08.2016 42.7 14.1 8.8 13.2 253 259 284
09.08.2016 41.4 13.6 8.1 11.9 243 273 284
10.08.2016 39.1 12.9 9.5 13.9 249 259 243
11.08.2016 38.7 12.8 8.7 13.2 258 279 284
Maximum 42.7 14.1 9.5 14.0 300
Minimum 37.4 12.3 7.4 11.1 242
Average 40.3 13.3 8.5 12.7 262
98 %tile 42.5 14.0 9.5 14.0 300
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
2
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-3
Location : Samiarpalayam (AAQ3)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 48.9 17.0 9.5 13.7 272 315 266
02.06.2016 44.7 15.5 11.6 15.9 282 299 282
03.06.2016 46.2 16.0 8.8 13.7 272 272 272
04.06.2016 49.0 17.0 9.4 14.6 299 299 279
06.06.2016 49.1 17.0 9.9 14.0 272 282 305
07.06.2016 48.3 16.8 9.0 14.7 272 332 266
08.06.2016 46.0 16.0 8.9 13.8 279 269 266
09.06.2016 45.5 15.8 8.8 15.0 266 315 312
01.07.2016 48.3 16.8 9.9 15.2 272 266 319
02.07.2016 47.5 16.5 9.2 14.5 299 299 272
04.07.2016 45.6 15.8 9.1 15.7 266 332 352
05.07.2016 47.1 16.4 10.3 14.4 315 345 272
06.07.2016 45.4 15.8 8.8 16.9 299 266 272
07.07.2016 43.3 15.1 9.0 17.3 332 299 332
08.07.2016 44.5 15.4 9.9 14.0 340 272 299
09.07.2016 45.4 15.8 9.1 15.6 266 266 349
01.08.2016 48.4 16.8 9.8 15.9 272 299 266
02.08.2016 48.8 17.0 10.3 13.4 279 266 345
03.08.2016 45.7 15.9 11.6 15.2 266 272 266
04.08.2016 46.2 16.0 9.5 15.9 299 299 299
05.08.2016 44.8 15.6 10.0 13.8 266 272 299
06.08.2016 46.6 16.2 10.3 14.3 272 269 266
08.08.2016 49.5 17.2 11.6 15.4 266 272 299
09.08.2016 47.9 16.6 9.2 14.6 282 266 299
10.08.2016 45.3 15.7 9.6 13.4 299 272 272
11.08.2016 44.8 15.6 9.9 15.3 332 299 299
Maximum 49.5 17.2 11.6 17.3 352
Minimum 43.3 15.1 8.8 13.4 266
Average 46.6 16.2 9.7 14.9 289
98 %tile 49.3 17.1 11.6 17.1 347
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
3
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-4
Location : Sottakavundampalayam (AAQ4)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 46.7 15.4 9.1 13.1 261 304 255
02.06.2016 42.6 14.1 8.7 13.5 271 287 259
03.06.2016 44.0 14.5 8.2 16.6 261 287 261
04.06.2016 46.7 15.4 9.0 13.1 287 244 258
06.06.2016 46.8 15.5 9.5 13.3 261 255 244
07.06.2016 46.1 15.2 11.2 16.6 261 244 255
08.06.2016 43.9 14.5 8.1 13.1 261 249 255
09.06.2016 43.5 14.3 8.5 16.2 249 303 277
01.07.2016 46.1 15.2 9.5 14.5 258 255 244
02.07.2016 45.3 15.0 8.9 13.8 244 282 261
04.07.2016 43.5 14.4 8.7 15.0 255 249 261
05.07.2016 45.0 14.8 9.9 15.8 303 255 261
06.07.2016 43.4 14.3 8.5 16.2 287 246 261
07.07.2016 41.4 13.6 8.6 16.5 244 287 249
08.07.2016 42.4 14.0 9.5 16.6 253 244 249
09.07.2016 43.4 14.3 8.6 16.5 255 255 249
01.08.2016 46.2 15.2 9.4 15.5 249 255 248
02.08.2016 46.6 15.4 9.9 16.2 252 255 246
03.08.2016 43.6 14.4 11.2 16.5 249 261 255
04.08.2016 44.0 14.5 9.1 16.6 287 287 287
05.08.2016 42.8 14.1 9.6 16.4 244 261 287
06.08.2016 44.5 14.7 9.9 16.0 261 244 255
08.08.2016 47.2 15.6 11.2 16.5 255 261 287
09.08.2016 45.7 15.1 8.9 14.0 277 279 287
10.08.2016 43.2 14.3 9.2 16.2 253 261 244
11.08.2016 42.8 14.1 9.5 15.5 244 259 287
Maximum 47.2 15.6 11.2 16.6 304
Minimum 41.4 13.6 8.1 13.1 244
Average 44.5 14.7 9.3 15.3 262
98 %tile 47.0 15.5 11.2 16.6 303
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
4
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-5
Location : Chamarajapalayam (AAQ5)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 37.3 12.3 6.8 10.4 248 265 243
02.06.2016 34.1 11.3 6.5 11.7 249 251 250
03.06.2016 35.2 11.6 8.2 14.5 258 251 250
04.06.2016 37.4 12.3 6.7 11.4 251 243 243
06.06.2016 37.5 12.4 7.1 10.6 277 271 250
07.06.2016 36.9 12.2 6.4 12.5 284 264 258
08.06.2016 35.1 11.6 6.0 10.4 258 255 264
09.06.2016 34.8 11.5 6.3 14.3 281 265 267
01.07.2016 36.9 12.2 8.4 10.4 248 243 246
02.07.2016 36.2 12.0 6.6 12.3 250 250 264
04.07.2016 34.8 11.5 6.5 10.8 243 264 259
05.07.2016 36.0 11.9 7.4 11.4 265 258 243
06.07.2016 34.7 11.5 8.3 11.3 251 243 248
07.07.2016 33.1 10.9 6.4 11.9 258 251 243
08.07.2016 34.0 11.2 7.1 11.0 243 268 254
09.07.2016 34.7 11.5 8.3 11.9 258 275 243
01.08.2016 36.9 12.2 7.0 11.1 253 264 251
02.08.2016 37.3 12.3 7.4 11.3 243 261 258
03.08.2016 34.9 11.5 8.3 12.3 264 243 243
04.08.2016 35.2 11.6 6.8 11.2 251 251 251
05.08.2016 34.2 11.3 7.2 12.2 279 264 282
06.08.2016 35.6 11.7 7.4 13.0 255 270 243
08.08.2016 37.8 12.5 8.3 11.9 258 243 250
09.08.2016 36.6 12.1 6.6 10.0 243 261 251
10.08.2016 34.6 11.4 8.4 10.2 264 258 243
11.08.2016 34.2 11.3 7.1 11.1 259 243 251
Maximum 37.8 12.5 8.4 14.5 284
Minimum 33.1 10.9 6.0 10.0 243
Average 35.6 11.8 7.2 11.6 255
98 %tile 37.6 12.4 8.4 14.4 281
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
5
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-6
Location : Tenumugamkangeyampalayam (AAQ6)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 38.1 12.6 6.9 11.6 253 271 248
02.06.2016 34.8 11.5 6.6 11.4 254 256 255
03.06.2016 35.9 11.9 8.4 14.8 263 256 255
04.06.2016 38.1 12.6 6.8 11.6 256 248 248
06.06.2016 38.2 12.6 7.2 12.8 283 276 255
07.06.2016 37.6 12.4 6.5 12.7 289 269 263
08.06.2016 35.8 11.8 6.2 12.4 263 260 269
09.06.2016 35.5 11.7 6.4 14.6 286 271 273
01.07.2016 37.6 12.4 8.6 10.6 253 248 251
02.07.2016 37.0 12.2 6.7 12.5 255 255 269
04.07.2016 35.5 11.7 6.6 11.0 248 269 264
05.07.2016 36.7 12.1 7.5 11.6 271 263 248
06.07.2016 35.4 11.7 8.5 11.6 256 248 253
07.07.2016 33.7 11.1 6.5 12.1 263 256 248
08.07.2016 34.6 11.4 7.2 11.2 248 273 259
09.07.2016 35.4 11.7 8.5 12.1 263 280 248
01.08.2016 37.7 12.4 7.1 11.4 258 269 256
02.08.2016 38.0 12.5 7.5 11.5 248 266 263
03.08.2016 35.6 11.7 8.5 12.6 269 248 248
04.08.2016 35.9 11.9 6.9 11.4 256 256 256
05.08.2016 34.9 11.5 7.3 12.5 285 269 288
06.08.2016 36.3 12.0 7.5 13.3 260 276 248
08.08.2016 38.6 12.7 8.5 12.1 263 248 255
09.08.2016 37.3 12.3 6.7 10.2 248 266 256
10.08.2016 35.3 11.6 8.6 11.4 269 263 248
11.08.2016 34.9 11.5 7.2 11.4 264 248 256
Maximum 38.6 12.7 8.6 14.8 289
Minimum 33.7 11.1 6.2 10.2 248
Average 36.3 12.0 7.4 12.0 261
98 %tile 38.4 12.7 8.6 14.7 287
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
6
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-7
Location : Chengapalli (AAQ7)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 37.7 12.4 6.9 12.5 250 268 245
02.06.2016 34.4 11.4 6.6 12.8 252 254 253
03.06.2016 35.6 11.7 8.3 14.6 261 254 253
04.06.2016 37.8 12.5 6.8 11.5 254 245 245
06.06.2016 37.8 12.5 7.1 11.7 280 274 253
07.06.2016 37.2 12.3 6.5 12.6 286 267 261
08.06.2016 35.5 11.7 6.1 11.5 261 258 267
09.06.2016 35.1 11.6 6.4 14.4 283 268 270
01.07.2016 37.2 12.3 8.5 10.5 250 245 248
02.07.2016 36.6 12.1 6.7 12.4 253 253 267
04.07.2016 35.2 11.6 6.6 10.9 245 267 261
05.07.2016 36.3 12.0 7.4 11.5 268 261 245
06.07.2016 35.0 11.6 8.4 11.2 254 245 250
07.07.2016 33.4 11.0 6.5 12.0 261 254 245
08.07.2016 34.3 11.3 7.1 11.1 245 271 256
09.07.2016 35.0 11.6 8.4 12.0 261 277 245
01.08.2016 37.3 12.3 7.1 11.2 255 267 254
02.08.2016 37.6 12.4 7.4 11.0 245 264 261
03.08.2016 35.3 11.6 8.4 12.5 267 245 245
04.08.2016 35.6 11.7 6.9 11.3 254 254 254
05.08.2016 34.6 11.4 7.2 12.3 282 267 285
06.08.2016 35.9 11.9 7.4 13.2 258 273 245
08.08.2016 38.2 12.6 8.4 12.0 261 245 253
09.08.2016 37.0 12.2 6.7 10.1 245 264 254
10.08.2016 34.9 11.5 8.5 11.3 267 261 245
11.08.2016 34.6 11.4 7.1 11.2 261 245 254
Maximum 38.2 12.6 8.5 14.6 286
Minimum 33.4 11.0 6.1 10.1 245
Average 36.0 11.9 7.3 11.9 258
98 %tile 38.0 12.5 8.5 14.5 284
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
7
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
TABLE-8
Location : Virumandapalayam (AAQ8)
CO
Date PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx
I II III
01.06.2016 36.6 12.1 6.7 11.2 243 260 238
02.06.2016 33.4 11.0 6.4 11.5 244 246 245
03.06.2016 34.5 11.4 8.0 14.2 253 246 245
04.06.2016 36.6 12.1 6.6 11.2 246 238 238
06.06.2016 36.7 12.1 6.9 12.4 271 265 245
07.06.2016 36.1 11.9 6.3 12.2 278 259 253
08.06.2016 34.4 11.4 5.9 12.2 253 250 259
09.06.2016 34.1 11.2 6.2 14.0 275 260 262
01.07.2016 36.1 11.9 8.2 10.2 243 238 241
02.07.2016 35.5 11.7 6.5 12.0 245 245 259
04.07.2016 34.1 11.3 6.4 10.6 238 259 254
05.07.2016 35.3 11.6 7.2 11.1 260 253 238
06.07.2016 34.0 11.2 8.1 12.2 246 238 243
07.07.2016 32.4 10.7 6.3 11.6 253 246 238
08.07.2016 33.3 11.0 6.9 10.6 238 262 249
09.07.2016 34.0 11.2 8.1 11.6 253 269 238
01.08.2016 36.2 11.9 6.8 10.9 248 259 246
02.08.2016 36.5 12.0 7.2 12.2 238 256 253
03.08.2016 34.2 11.3 8.1 12.1 259 238 238
04.08.2016 34.5 11.4 6.7 11.1 246 246 246
05.08.2016 33.5 11.1 7.0 12.0 274 259 277
06.08.2016 34.9 11.5 7.2 12.8 250 265 238
08.08.2016 37.0 12.2 8.1 11.6 253 238 245
09.08.2016 35.9 11.8 6.5 12.8 238 256 246
10.08.2016 33.9 11.2 8.2 12.1 259 253 238
11.08.2016 33.5 11.1 6.9 10.9 254 238 246
Maximum 37.0 12.2 8.2 14.2 278
Minimum 32.4 10.7 5.9 10.2 238
Average 34.9 11.5 7.1 11.9 250
98 %tile 36.9 12.2 8.2 14.1 276
3
Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) ng/m , Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3)
Ammonia (NH3), Arsenic (As) ng/m3 and Nickel (Ni) ng/m3
are Below the Detectable Limit
All the values except BaP, As, Ni are expressed as g/m3
8
ANNEXURE-V
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS
Total
PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO
Max 49.5 17.2 11.6 17.3 352
Min 32.4 10.7 5.9 10.0 203
Average Max 46.6 16.2 9.7 15.3 289
Min 34.9 11.5 7.1 11.6 250
9
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
201
164
rain
7 water
collecting
179
8 chamber
E 160
AP AREA
SC
ND SLNO
LA EA PARTICULARS HECTARE ACRES PERCENTAGE
AR
RO
2 1 INDUSTRIAL SHEDS 33 81.5 38
AD
178
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
LINE
PIPE
CAR PARKING WITH SOLAR UNIT
WATER
2 MW
2 OPEN PARKING AREA 0.96 2.4 1
1
RO
AD
135 3 ROAD AREA 5 12.4 6
LINE
5
WATER PIPE
6 166 4 GREEN BELT AREA 33.2 82 34
RAIN WATER
LINE
159 RAIN WATER COLLECTING PIPE
PIPE
HARVESTING 5 OSR AREA 9.8 24.2
WATER
RAIN WATER COLLECTING PIPE
4 10
167
OL 6 37.6
TR K OPEN AREA 15.2 16
PE BUN
ROAD
E
PIP
G
217
TIN
EC
LL
STORAGE
7105 M2
CO
TOTAL
ER
158
3
AT
97.5 241.01
W
136
SHED 1
IN
WATER PIPE LINE
WEAVING UNIT
RA
24 LOOMS
ROAD
W UNIT 7 4800 M2
ROAD
rain water
M2 200 S.M.U
STP 2000
UNIT 1
water collecting W UNIT 8 8600 M2
137 156
ROAD
UNIT 4 7200 M2
UNIT 1 1200 M2
WEAVING UNIT OF
UNIT 2 4800 M2
GARMENTS UNIT 2,3 12500
36 LOOM SHED
W UNIT 9 8600 M2
155
GARMENTS STAFFS REST ROOM UNIT 1 60000
GARMENTING UNIT
200 S.M.U W UNIT 1 5400 M2 W UNIT 2 5400 M2
UNIT 4,5 18000
7105 M2
RAIN WATER
ROAD
UNIT 1 8500
STORAGE
WATER PIPE LINE
UNIT 5 7200 M2
UNIT 3 4800 M2
HARVESTING
ROAD
WEAVING UNIT OF
WEAVING UNIT3 8200
36 LOOM SHED
WEAVING UNIT OF
154
36 LOOM SHED
W UNIT 14 8600 M2
ROAD ROAD
UNIT 4 CANTEEN UNIT 1 2500
W UNIT 10 8600 M2
153 WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
WEAVING 4500
WEAVING UNIT OF
141
36 LOOM SHED
W UNIT 4 3100 M2
WEAVING UNIT 5 7500
ROAD
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
UNIT 7,18,19,20,21
WATER PIPE LINE
WEAVING 30000
W UNIT 11 8600 M2
4500
chamber
W UNIT 5 5150 M2
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
216
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
UNIT1,2,3,4 18500 OSR UNIT 1 98000
W UNIT 12 8600 M2
WARPING
ROAD
rain
water W UNIT 16 8600 M2
collecting
ROAD
well(rick)
TEXCHANGE- PROJECT
UNIT1,2 OPEN SPACE UNIT 1 78900
WEAVING UNIT OF
SAND
BED
WELL
DYING 12500
36 LOOM SHED WATER PIPE LINE
SPINNING
TEXCHANGE- PROJECT
W UNIT 13 8600M2
W UNIT 17 8600 M2
237 STORAGE SHED UNIT 1,2,3 GREEN BELT AREA UNIT 1 332000
WATER PIPE LINE
WEAVING UNIT
24 LOOMS
23000
W UNIT 18 4800 M2 ROAD
ROAD 217
ROAD
7105 M2
229
WEAVING UNIT19
4400 M2
WARPING UNIT DYING 4200 M2
STORAGE
UNIT 3
ROAD
UNIT1
SHED 2
24 LOOMS UNIT 1 4400 M2
ROAD
4800 M2
NG UNIT
WARPI
ROAD
UNIT 2
UNIT 4
DYING
UNIT2 4200 M2
235 218
4400 M2
4400 M2
150 rain
WEAVING UNIT RAIN WATER COLLECTING PIPE water
24 LOOMS SAND collecting
ROAD ROAD FILTER well(rick)
W UNIT 20 4800 M2
WATER PIPE LINE
WATER PIPE LINE
ETP LINE
149/150
WEAVING UNIT FENCING
24 LOOMS
POWER PROJECT
ROAD
AREA
W UNIT 21 4800M2
143
rain
water rain
14000 SFT collecting water
rain
chamber water
SLNO
collecting
2
rain
water
chamber
collecting
well(rick)
PARTICULARS
LINE
collecting
well(rick) ETP LINE
PIPE
ER
WAT
1 CAR PARKING
SUB STATION
144
ETP
PIPE LINE
WATER
CLUB
PIP
3
TER
WA
ETP LINE
5 SITE OFFICE
6 CREACH
7 AMPULANCE ROOM
TOPO SKETCH PLAN
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT 8 NURSHING ROOM
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
201
164
rain
7 water
collecting
rain
water
179
8
collecting
chamber
E 160 well(rick)
AP
SC
ND
LA EA
AR rain
water
RO
2
AD
178
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
LINE
PIPE
WATER
1
RO
AD
AREA
135
LINE
5 SLNO PARTICULARS HECTARE ACRES PERCENTAGE
WATER PIPE
2 MW
CAR PARKING WITH SOLAR UNIT
6 166
RAIN WATER 1 INDUSTRIAL SHEDS 21.7 53.6 22.3
LINE
159 RAIN WATER COLLECTING PIPE
PIPE
HARVESTING
WATER
RAIN WATER COLLECTING PIPE
ROAD
3 ROAD AREA 5 12.4 5.1
E
4
PIP
33.2 34.1
G
217
IN
CT
E
LL
STORAGE
CO
ER
3 158
AT
W
136
IN
SHED 1
WATER PIPE LINE
WEAVING UNIT
9.8
RA
24 LOOMS
10.1
ROAD
W UNIT 7 32825 SFT
SPINNING
ROAD
UNIT ROAD
6 SOLAR POWER PLANT 5.3 13.1 5.4
234900 WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
rain GARMENTING UNIT
7 WARE HOUSES 10 24.7 10.3
ROAD
rain
water
collecting
water
collecting
chamber
SFT W UNIT 8 64300 SFT
200 S.M.U
well(rick)
137 156
ROAD
UNIT 4 46100 SFT
UNIT 1 48150 SFT
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
GARMENTING UNIT
155
9 OPEN AREA 5 12.4 5.1
164810 SFT
ROAD
STORAGE
WATER PIPE LINE
WEAVING UNIT OF
TOTAL
97.5 241. 100.00
36 LOOM SHED
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
W UNIT 14 64300 SFT
154 ROAD ROAD
W UNIT 10 64300 SFT
153
WEAVING UNIT OF WEAVING UNIT OF
ROAD
ROAD
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
WEAVING UNIT OF
WATER PIPE LINE
rain
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED
216
WEAVING UNIT OF
water 36 LOOM SHED
collecting W UNIT 12 64300 SFT
ROAD
well(rick)
W UNIT 16 64300 SFT
ROAD
TEXCHANGE- PROJECT
WELL
SAND
BED
WEAVING UNIT OF
36 LOOM SHED WATER PIPE LINE
126
ROAD
TEXCHANGE- PROJECT
W UNIT 13 64300 SFT
151
142 WEAVING UNIT OF
ROAD
36 LOOM SHED
rain rain
W UNIT 17 64300 SFT
237 water
WATER PIPE LINE
water
collecting collecting
WEAVING UNIT chamber well(rick)
24 LOOMS
W UNIT 18 32825 SFT ROAD
ROAD 217
ROAD
229
WEAVING UNIT
24400 SFT
WARPING UNIT DYING 25855 SFT
STORAGE
UNIT 3
ROAD
UNIT1
SHED 2
24 LOOMS UNIT 1 24400 SFT
ROAD
32825 SFT
IT
NG UN
WARPI
ROAD
UNIT 2
UNIT 4
DYING
UNIT2 25855 SFT
235 218
24400 SFT
24400 SFT
150 rain
WEAVING UNIT RAIN WATER COLLECTING PIPE water
24 LOOMS SAND collecting
ROAD ROAD FILTER well(rick)
W UNIT 20 32825 SFT
WATER PIPE LINE
WATER PIPE LINE
ETP LINE
149/150
WEAVING UNIT
FENCING
24 LOOMS
POWER PROJECT
ROAD
AREA
W UNIT 21 32825 SFT
143
rain
water rain
14000 SFT collecting water
rain
chamber water
collecting
collecting
2
rain chamber
water well(rick)
LINE
collecting
well(rick) ETP LINE
PIPE
ER
WAT
SUB STATION
144
ETP
ETP LINE
E
E LIN
LINE
WATE R PIPE
PIP
TER
WA
ETP LINE
PER YEAR GENERATION (NOT LESS THAN) - 509490*12 = 6113880 UNITS / YEAR
Excluding VAT @ 5%
VAT Nil against any exemption certificate.
For
By
Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3
2. Water Consumption and Waste Water Details ......Error! Bookmark not defined.
9. Method of Treatment5
1. INTRODUCTION
M/s. RR DENIM (P) LTD., is an unit to be involved in the production of Knitted & Washing denim products at
its unit is to be located at IG3 Infra Ltd Textile Park, Uthukuli Taluk, Tirupur District.
The plants suggested by Green Vision, allow an optimum reduction of the contamination contained in waste
water and the transformation of this contamination into chemical elements not dangerous to the
environment and human life.
Annexure I
DESIGN BASIS:-
The proposal is for a wastewater treatment plant for the entire wastewater generated in the complex and to
reuse the treated water for non-contact uses like, gardening and toilet flushing
Grid Chamber
Equalization Sump
Secondary Clarifier
Ultra Filtration
Treated Effluent
Refine Nature Define future
Green Vision
METHOD OF TREATMENT
The raw effluent is collected in a collection sump followed by equalization tank through bar screen and grid
chamber to filter the large size suspended particles. The tank will have a hydraulic retention time of 20
hours. The Raw effluent from the equalization tank is pumped to the Neutralisation tanks to maintain the pH
levels by using acid/alkali chemicals with coagulants. After the chemicals treatment, it is allowed to proimary
clarifier to out the 70% of sludge. And then, overflow from primary clarifier is passed to the SBR aeration
tank reduce the BOD/COD. The complete operation of SBR divided into a number of cycles that will be carried
per day in single reactor or basin , the duration of each cycle is 3-6 hours and each cycle comprises of the
following phase which are repeated.
Fill
Aeration
Settling
Decanting
pH 7.22
Total Dissolved Solids 5000 to 15000 ppm
Taste Disagreeable
Odor Agreeable
Color Colorless
Turbidity 10 ntu
Chloride 186 ppm
Sulphate 12 ppm
Alkalinity 144 ppm
Nitrate 2.36 ppm
Fluride Nil
Iron Nil
Total hardness (mg/l) 516 ppm
Silica (mg/l) 1 ppm
TDS in Treated Effluent <50ppm
RO FEED SUMP
Micron Filter
REJECT PERMEATE
REUSE
EVAPORATION
MECHANICAL SOLAR
EVAPORATION (Or) EVAPORATION
(or)
S. No Particulars Quantity
Ist Stage RO Components Recovery 70% (ie 112KLPH from 160KLPH)
1 High Pressure Pump (HPP) 1O+1S
2 Feed Pump 1O+1S
3 MS PC Skid 1
4 Dosing Pump 8
5 SS Cartridge Filter housing with filter 1
6 Membrane 16 (80200)
7 5 Element Long Membrane Housing 16
8 Rota meters 2
9 Pressure Gauges 3
10 HPS & LPS 1 Set
11 Pipeline 1 lot
12 Panel Board 1
Second Stage RO Components Recovery 55% (ie 27KLPH from 48KLPH)
1 High Pressure Pump (HPP) 1O+1S
2 MS PC Skid 1
3 Dosing Pump 3
4 Membrane 8 (80200)
5 5 Element Long Membrane Housing 600 psi 8
6 Rota meters 2
7 Pressure Gauges 3
8 HPS & LPS 1 Set
9 Pipeline 1 lot
10 Panel Board 1
Third Stage RO Components Recovery 50% (ie 11KLPH from 21KLPH)
1 High Pressure Pump (HPP) 1O+1S
2 MS PC Skid 1
3 Dosing Pump 1
4 Membrane 4 (80200)
5 5 Element Long Membrane Housing 1000 psi 4
6 Rota meters 2
7 Pressure Gauges 3
8 HPS & LPS 1 Set
9 SS Pipeline 1 lot
10 Panel Board 1
7. MEMBRANE:
TYPE : TFC POLYAMIDE
SIZE : 80 DIA * 4 FEET LENGTH
QUANTITY : 5 Nos
MAKE : HYDRONAUTICS
RATING : 0.0001 MICRON
8. SKID:
MOC : SS 202
QUANTITY : 1 No
CAPACITY : 3000LPH PLANT
TYPE : RECTANGLE
SIZE : 2 METER
9. PRESSURE SWITCH :
PRESSURE SWITCH : HIGH & LOW PRESSURE
QUANTITY : 1 + 1 Nos
LOCATION : BEFORE & AFTER H.P.PUMP
MAKE : DANFOS / WAREE
Our RO Plant has been designed for the feed capacity of 16,00,000lit/day. It is designed for three stage
recovery. The Permeate from the stage-I shall be about 70%, i.e., 11,20,000litres of product water obtained
from the feed water. The remaining reject of 30%, i.e., 48000liters from stage-I is treated in stage-II. The
Permeate from stage-II is about 55%, i.e., 27000litres. The remaining reject of 45%, i.e., 21000liters from
stage-II is treated in stage-III. The Permeate from stage-III is about 45%, i.e., 11000litres and the reject
quantity 10000litres/day.
MANAGEMENT OF RO REJECTION
The reject from the stage III of RO System is about 100000litres of wastewater with high TDS will be
generated. The rejects shall be evaporated as the options mentioned in below.
Area required for evaporating the above said quantity of rejects as per our Meteorological Norms is
The system designed with the principle of Thermal Evaporation. Feed is evaporated in multiple stages of
calendrias and steam ejected with constant pressure and re circulated in multistage toachieve the desired
result. We designed the system in such a way that the liquid reaches the ultimatums stage of specific gravity
to minimize pollution. In the process, the entire liquid which evaporated is condensed and taken back as pure
water. Feed is transferred via pre heater at backward directions to keep feed temperature to near
evaporation temperature and entered in top of first calendrias. In our design, the major evaporation is done
in first two calendrias by using steam recycling from second calendrias outlet. Steam ejector with multiple
nozzles is help to thermo vapor recompression for steam recycling. Vacuum is maintained in all calendrias to
keep effective evaporation at less than 90 degree.
M/S IG3 INFRA LTD TEXTILE PARK, with their Registered Office at Chennai one 200Feet
Thoraipakkam Pallavaram Road, Thoraipakkam, Chennai - 97, are planning to establish a textile park
with facilities for cotton based textile products.
The clients wish to establish an Effluent Treatment Plant for treating the effluent from all dyeing units to
the levels of Zero Discharge Units and have assigned us to provide them with design & consultancy for
providing Effluent Treatment Plants for their entire complex.
And the product water from Secondary & Tertiary Treatment Scheme shall be recycled for process
reuse.
The effluent generated from Sizing units and Domestic sewage shall be treated
Separately in Primary Treatment Scheme and shall be reused for gardening and toilet flushing.
The characteristics of combined Trade effluent generated from the proposed units
would be higher than the discharge standards of TNPCB with respect to TDS , TSS , BOD ,
COD . The various parameters shall be as tabulated below:
TREATMENT PROCESS:
PRIMARY TREATMENT:
Equalization:
The trade effluent generated from the various process streams shall be collected in a
Collection Tank so that the concentration variations of the different process streams are
equalized and the effluent can be treated for an uniform set of parameters. The coarse
suspended particles settle down by gravity in this tank and the sludge is removed
periodically to Filter Press / Sludge Drying beds.
Neutralization:
The equalized effluent is acidic in nature. Hence milk of lime is added to neutralize
the effluent and to raise the pH level to desired range of 7-9.
Anaerobic Digestion
Oxidative digestion is carried out in the absence of air in a closed vessel and
methane and ammonia are liberated as the end products. We have adopted one of the
High Rate Anaerobic system for anaerobic treatment of the trade effluent generated from
this industry. The Anaerobic Reactor operates as a suspended growth system, with no
packing material in the reactor. The waste water enters the tank from the bottom, and
flows upward through the sludge bed, which gets formed during the process itself.
The microbes attach to each other or to small particles of the suspended matter of
sewage, to form granules or agglomerates and ultimately the sludge bed.
The gas produced in the process causes sufficient agitation to keep the sludge fully
mixed. Retention of the bacteria containing sludge in this reactor is one of the most
important features of this process.The bacteria in the sludge continue to perform their
function of treating the incoming effluent. The continuous bacterial presence and activity
enables retention time in the reactor to be reduced to about 6-12 hrs as compared to at
least 30 hours that is required for conventional treatment systems. 70-90% reduction in
BOD is achieved in this. The treated effluent is discharged out for further aerobic
treatment. The sludge is periodically shifted into the drying beds, to be used as a soil
enriched
.
ANOXIC TANK
The effluent from the Anaerobic Reactor shall be held in an anoxic unit for 60 to 90
minutes for de-nitrification purposes. DO in this tank shall be maintained at less than 1
ppm and never zero. The treated water shall be mixed in this tank at a ratio of around 0.75
to 1.
The supernatant from the Anoxic Unit flows into the Sequential Batch Reactor which
will facilitate mixing metabolism and sedimentation. The SBR process utilizes a fill and
draw reactor with complete mixing during the batch reaction step and the subsequent
steps of aeration and clarification occurs in the same tank.
For continuous flow application the settling zone shall be provided in an annular
manner circumscribing the fill and aeration zone. The amount and frequency of sludge
wasting shall be determined by performance requirements.
The unique feature of the SBR process is that there is no need for a return activated
sludge system since no sludge is lost in the react step and none has to be returned to
maintain the solids content in the aeration chamber.
The drained treated effluent from the Sequential Batch Reactors Settling zone is
disinfected by adding suitable chlorinating agents and pumped out after filtration in the
Pressure Sand Filter for gardening and irrigation.
This system has several advantages like higher Oxygen Transfer Rate , low cost of
construction and operation. The treated effluent is fit for recycling for toilet flushing ,
gardening etc.
THEORY OF SBR
The Activated Sludge Process (ASP) has been widely used as a standard method for
treating domestic wastewater. This process though efficient, is costly in terms of capital
cost, operational costs and requires more power than other comparable process. In the
ASP, the pumps recycle the biological flocs from the secondary clarifier in the aeration
tank for maintaining requisite concentration of the biomass for metabolic reactions. If it is
possible to keep the biological flocs in the aeration tank by arresting the carry over of the
solids into the secondary clarifier, the recycle pumping system may be removed which
reduces the cost appreciably. This is possible if the units of ASP are integrated and the
geometry plays an importance role.
Sequential Batch reactor is a treatment scheme where in a tank / sets of tanks on a fill,
react and draw on sequence of operations. The tank(s) are filled for a certain period and
then operated as a batch reactor. After desired level of treatment is achieved the mixed
liquid is allowed to settle for a predetermined time, and the clarified supernatant is
discharged from the tank.
The sequence of operations carried out for effective treatment involves five phases viz.
Fill, React, Settle, Draw and Idle.The SBR is an activated sludge process designed to
operate under non-steady state condition. An SBR operates in true batch mode with
aeration and settling both occurring in same tank. The major difference between SBR and
conventional continuous flow, activated sludge system is that the SBR tank carries out the
functions of equalization aeration and sedimentation in a time sequence rather than in the
conventional space sequence of continuous-flow systems. In addition, the SBR system can
be designed with the ability to treat a wide range of influent volumes whereas the continuous system is
based upon a fixed influent flow rate. Thus, there is a degree of flexibility associated with working in a
time rather than in a space sequence.
SBRs produce sludge with good settling properties provided the influent wastewater is
admitted into the aeration in a controlled manner.
SBR system is a modified version of Activated Sludge Process. As in any activated sludge
process a mixed culture of bacteria capable of removing COD, BOD and nutrients is
developed.
The SBR is unique in its ability to act as an equalization basin, aeration basin and clarifier
within a single basin. The system operates with proven simple sequences of FILL, REACT, SETTLE
and DECANT in a single reactor configuration. In the reactor sufficient amount of oxygen is supplied to
oxidize the organics absorbed by the bacterial biomass. Required quantity of oxygen is supplied, and
mixing is done by the Diffused Aeration System. The settled sludge at the bottom of the reactor is used
to maintain the bacterial population in the reactor. The excess sludge is wasted periodically into the
Sludge. Drying Bed (SDB). The filtrate from the SDB is collected in filtrate collection sump and the
filtrate is transferred to the SBR Required quantity of urea & DAP are added manually.
The flocculating effect thus enhances the settling rate of the particles/flocs as well
as the sedimentation and thickening of the sludge at the bottom of the settling tank/clarifier.
In this process, along with the removal of collided and suspended particles, substantial quantity of
dissolved organics are also removed partly by precipitation and party by adsorption to the new surface
created by coagulation/precipitation.
Chemical Co-agulants like Ferrous Sulphate is added to bring the non-settling
particles into larger heavier masses of solids called flocs. This is accomplished in the
mixing platform by
1. by addition of lime for raising the pH of the effluent is raised to the range of
around 12 for enabling good reaction of FeSO4
2. dosing the co-agulant FeSO4in the range of 500-700 ppm
3. alongwith around 5 ppm of polyelectrolyte and
4. passing the dosed effluent to pass through the baffled mixing channels.
Settling:
The effluent is allowed to settle in the Settling Tank where the flocks settle down
and the supernatant is clear water.
The sludge shall be periodically removed to the Filter Press / Sludge drying beds
where after drying for around 5-7 days shall be disposed for safe disposal .
Filtration:
The clarified effluent is subjected to filtration in the Multi Media Filter for
removing any fine suspended particles that might have escaped in the sedimentation
process.
specific removal of heavy metals from proces streams for reuse of water
70% Product
RO 1 1750KLD
50% Product
RO 2 525 Kld
40% Product
RO 3 262 KLD
60% Brine
Nano 131 KLD
90% condensate
SBR
Filter Press
Disinfection by 2 stage UV
UNITS: - 2
3) 30 cum/hr Activated
Carbon Filter 6nos
Product water
Collection Sump
15 (PWS 1 &2) 2 16m x 11m x 3m
ADEQUACY STATUS:
The Collection tank size, clarifier tank, SBR, coagulation unit and sludge blanket
reactor size is adequate for 1750KLD process water treatment.
2
(UASBR 4)
(SBR-AZ 5)
(SBR-SZ 3)
6 Filter Feed Sump 1 4.5m x 7.5m x 3.30m Filter Feed Pump 2 nos (
(FFS-5) 1(O) + 1(S) )
3) 30 cum/hr Activated
Carbon Filter 1 nos
ADEQUACY STATUS:
The collection tank, SBR and sludge tank size is adequate for 275 KLD capacity
treatment process.
Annexure-XVIII
MATERIAL BALANCE
Process
Input/Raw materials Output products / Wastes
Fabrics 8,000 Dyed Fabrics 7680
Waste fabrics 320
Total 8,000 Total 8000
Warping
Input / Raw materials Output products / Wastes
Fabric Threads 4,020 Fabric 3,979.8
End bits 40.2
Total 4,020 Total 4,020
Secondary Warping
Input / Raw materials Output products / Wastes
Fabric threads 3,278 Fabric 3,245.2
End bits 32.8
Total 3,278 Total 3,278
Sizing
Input / Raw materials Output products / Wastes
Fabric threads 3,015 Fabric threads 3,015
1 R. R. Denim Pvt. Ltd Process 11948 4.000 3.840 180 8.1 640.0 7.70 629.1 4.62 622.83
2 Rio Textiles Process 11948 4.000 3.840 180 8.1 640.0 7.70 629.1 4.62 622.83
3 Sparrow Textiles Looms 5167 1.870 1.830 42 1.89 0.0 1.80 0.0 1.08 0.62
4 Zeto Textiles Looms 3650 2.740 2.699 56 2.52 0.027 2.39 0.03 1.44 0.82
5 Airo textiles Looms 6101 1.639 1.614 48 2.16 0.016 2.05 0.02 1.23 0.70
6 Lotus branding Pvt. Ltd Looms 11948 0.837 0.824 204 9.18 0.008 8.72 0.01 5.23 2.99
7 Leeio Textiles Looms 6101 1.639 1.614 72 3.24 0.016 3.08 0.02 1.85 1.06
8 R. R. Denim Pvt. Ltd Looms 9950 1.005 0.990 160 7.2 0.010 6.84 0.01 4.10 2.35
9 Gio Textiles Looms 9950 1.005 0.990 160 7.2 0.010 6.84 0.01 4.10 2.35
10 Savute Fashions (P) Ltd Looms 9950 1.005 0.990 160 7.2 0.010 6.84 0.01 4.10 2.35
11 Yet to be leased Warping 9950 1.005 1.000 24 1.08 0.010 1.03 0.01 0.62 1.40
12 Yet to be leased Warping 9950 1.005 1.000 24 1.08 0.010 1.03 0.01 0.62 1.40
13 Yet to be leased Warping 9950 1.005 1.000 24 1.08 0.010 1.03 0.01 0.62 1.40
14 Yet to be leased Warping 9950 1.005 1.000 24 1.08 0.010 1.03 0.01 0.62 1.40
15 Yet to be leased Sizing 9950 1.005 0.985 32 1.44 10.050 1.37 10.03 0.82 9.93
16 Yet to be leased Sizing 9950 1.005 0.985 32 1.44 10.050 1.37 10.03 0.82 9.93
17 Yet to be leased Sizing 9950 1.005 0.985 32 1.44 10.050 1.37 10.03 0.82 9.93
18 Yet to be leased Secondary warping 6101 1.639 1.631 24 1.08 0.016 1.03 0.01 0.62 0.82
19 Yet to be leased Secondary warping 6101 1.639 1.631 24 1.08 0.016 1.03 0.01 0.62 0.82
20 Lotus branding Pvt. Ltd Garmenting 6101 1.639 1.619 128 5.76 0.016 5.47 0.02 3.28 3.12
21 Anbalaya A Fabric Garmenting 6101 1.639 1.619 54 2.43 0.016 2.31 0.02 1.39 1.32
22 SAT linen Pvt. Ltd Garmenting 8942 1.118 1.104 144 6.48 0.011 6.16 0.01 3.69 3.51
23 Yet to be leased Garmenting 5162 1.937 1.913 84 3.78 0.019 3.59 0.02 2.15 2.05
24 Yet to be leased Garmenting 5123 1.952 1.928 80 3.6 0.020 3.42 0.02 2.05 1.95
25 R. R. Denim Pvt. Ltd Garmenting 8561 1.168 1.154 80 3.6 0.012 3.42 0.01 2.05 1.95
26 Yet to be leased Garmenting 8561 1.168 1.153 80 3.6 0.012 3.42 0.01 2.05 1.95
97 1310 92 1289 55.20 1312
G.Total 1407 1381 1367
Annexure-XX
Annexure-XXII
Source:
ANNEXURE-XXIII
LANDUSE PATTERN
LANDUSE PATTERN OF THE STUDY AREA ACCORDING TO DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK 2011
0-3 Km
1 Vadamugakangeyampalayam 580.25 0.00 98.2 18.56 153.09 0.00 1.72 308.68
2 Tenmugakangeyampalayam 462.14 0.00 60.43 14.27 169.86 0.00 1.69 215.89
3 Sengalipalayam 507.61 0.00 55.49 87.91 284.89 0.00 0.00 79.32
4 Chinneripalayam 642.98 0.00 76.43 108.15 368.59 0.00 0.00 89.81
5 Virumandapalayam 1048.33 0.00 92.11 203.79 443.88 0.00 0.00 308.55
Sub Total 3241.31 0.00 382.66 432.68 1420.31 0.00 3.41 1002.25
3-7 Km
6 Karukkupalayam 653.12 0.00 53.88 128.00 455.49 0.00 0.00 15.75
7 Tachchapalayam 221.30 0.00 22.50 21.66 125.77 0.00 0.35 51.02
8 Kavuttampalayam 854.42 0.00 127.63 140.75 468.97 0.00 1.29 115.78
9 Alampalayam 437.11 0.00 84.69 289.17 29.45 0.00 0.00 33.8
10 Serkanpalayam 216.91 0.00 20.74 172.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.81
11 Nadupatti 512.34 0.00 30.35 43.90 205.30 0.00 0.08 232.71
12 Kongampalayam 234.88 0.00 10.79 11.72 116.49 0.00 64.12 31.76
13 Malakavundanpalayam 988.78 0.00 128.95 110.18 444.09 0.00 0.00 305.56
14 Reddipalayam 327.17 0.00 58.51 17.97 126.11 0.00 1.96 122.62
15 Sirukkalanji 1166.20 0.00 96.44 77.60 612.71 0.00 2.45 377
16 Pudupalayam 312.46 0.00 28.84 79.99 174.72 0.00 0.00 28.91
17 Ichchipalayam 475.28 0.00 29.38 27.68 330.75 0.00 0.00 87.47
18 Kalipalayam 1087.29 0.00 117.85 167.11 341.85 0.00 0.00 460.48
19 Uthukuli 1604.10 0.00 324.90 484.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 794.25
20 Chettipalayam 216.91 0.00 20.74 172.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.81
21 Kavundanpalayam 335.83 0.00 54.83 13.54 152.34 0.00 0.57 114.55
22 Pallapalayam 518.48 0.00 85.06 326.62 78.42 0.00 0.00 28.38
23 Muttampalayam 414.59 0.00 159.33 65.32 134.73 0.00 0.13 55.08
24 Pudupalayam 1163.29 0.00 292.90 125.32 252.55 30.48 0.00 462.04
Sub Total 11740.46 0.00 1748.31 2476.20 4049.74 30.48 70.95 3364.78
7-10 km
25 Ganapathipalayam 798.02 0.00 87.29 42.00 72.00 0.00 15.71 581.02
26 Ardanaripalayam 1312.14 0.00 204.24 756.25 85.91 8.98 105.76 151
27 Velamapalayam 1499.69 0.00 264.99 782.92 0.00 0.00 85.81 365.97
28 Velampalayam 348.47 0.00 29.64 67.22 165.99 0.00 0.00 85.62
29 Semmandapalayam 1393.35 0.00 222.41 428.63 16.71 683.15 0.00 42.45
30 Chinna virangali 600.52 0.00 46.43 122.32 298.61 0.00 0.00 133.16
31 Nettichelumpalayam 116.78 0.00 12.64 21.60 43.31 0.00 0.00 39.23
32 Mettupudur 476.40 0.00 42.93 45.78 272.83 0.00 0.00 114.86
33 Marappanayakkanpalayam 50.63 0.00 2.82 2.88 21.81 0.00 0.00 23.12
34 Vyapadi 1429.15 130.32 152.93 46.96 429.52 3.00 0.09 666.33
35 Varappalayam 1400.56 0.00 181.39 111.89 231.30 0.00 0.01 875.97
36 Pappanpalayam 358.33 0.00 24.13 117.50 177.00 0.00 2.56 37.14
37 Anaippalayam 617.95 0.00 100.13 27.14 274.74 0.00 0.00 215.94
38 Ammapalayam 261.74 0.00 25.37 222.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.75
39 Vavipalayam 3472.84 0.00 308.38 1321.25 141.31 0.00 0.00 1701.9
40 Kanakkampalayam 903.14 0.00 127.65 556.54 22.15 0.00 0.51 196.29
41 Andipalayam 523.00 0.00 94.21 384.84 0.00 0.00 6.30 37.65
42 Sandaipalayam 925.81 0.00 100.28 193.46 406.71 0.00 0.42 224.94
43 Chengalipalayam 507.61 0.00 55.49 87.91 284.89 0.00 0.00 79.32
44 Kunnatur 902.04 0.00 147.13 175.08 116.89 0.00 2.45 460.49
Sub Total 17898.17 130.32 2230.48 5514.79 3061.68 695.13 219.62 6046.15
Grand Total 32879.94 130.32 4361.45 8423.67 8531.73 725.61 293.98 10413.18
Source: District Census handbook on Landuse, 2011 - Coimbatore & Tiruppur District
A5-1
DEMOGRAPHY PATTERN OF THE STUDY AREA ACCORDING TO DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK 2011
No of Total Total Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Main Marginal Non
Sr. No. Name of Village TRU Total Male Total SC Total ST
household population Female Literates literates literates Illiterates Illiterates Illiterates workers workers workers workers
0-3 km
1 Vadamugakangeyampalayam Rural 395 1262 645 617 358 70 812 481 331 450 164 286 750 716 34 512
2 Tenmugakangeyampalayam Rural 498 1644 840 804 424 0 1010 616 394 634 224 410 1038 1012 26 606
3 Sengalipalayam Rural 343 1078 535 543 259 0 684 402 282 394 133 261 714 697 17 364
4 Chinneripalayam Rural 680 2433 1250 1183 844 0 1571 904 667 862 346 516 1401 1355 46 1032
5 Virumandapalayam Rural 1029 3555 1762 1793 962 0 2230 1244 986 1325 518 807 2057 1111 946 1498
Sub Total 2945 9972 5032 4940 2847 70 6307 3647 2660 3665 1385 2280 5960 4891 1069 4012
3-7 km
6 Karukkupalayam Rural 527 1634 832 802 375 0 951 576 375 683 256 427 1080 285 11 554
7 Kavuttampalayam Rural 922 3025 1466 1559 800 0 1748 984 764 1277 482 795 1930 1917 13 1095
8 Serkanpalayam Rural 237 767 402 365 32 0 492 302 190 275 100 175 510 94 11 257
9 Nadupatti Rural 268 861 439 422 130 0 508 303 205 353 136 217 402 276 126 459
10 Kongampalayam Rural 116 388 201 187 100 0 224 144 80 164 57 107 245 55 6 143
11 Malakavundanpalayam Rural 421 1448 755 693 439 0 940 549 391 508 206 302 832 793 39 616
12 Reddipalayam Rural 534 1826 925 901 724 0 1174 665 509 652 260 392 987 877 110 839
13 Sirukkalanji Rural 702 2334 1204 1130 253 0 1472 872 600 862 332 530 1394 1308 86 940
14 Pudupalayam Rural 353 1134 566 568 267 0 633 367 266 501 199 302 701 700 1 433
15 Ichchipalayam Rural 327 1158 591 567 401 13 732 422 310 426 169 257 672 658 14 486
16 Kalipalayam Rural 255 934 465 469 473 0 573 324 249 361 141 220 614 541 73 320
17 Uthukuli Urban 3000 10130 5027 5103 910 4 7636 4127 3509 2494 900 1594 4746 4320 426 5384
18 Chettipalayam Urban 10439 37620 19072 18548 1984 46 27931 15065 12866 9689 4007 5682 17592 17169 423 20028
19 Kavundanpalayam Rural 502 1610 792 818 395 0 1056 585 471 554 207 347 867 784 83 743
20 Pallapalayam Rural 1281 4787 2320 2467 1084 4 2986 1624 1362 1801 696 1105 2665 2638 27 2122
21 Muttampalayam Rural 441 1463 761 702 114 0 954 575 379 509 186 323 782 669 113 681
22 Pudupalayam Rural 2119 7671 3869 3802 1968 14 4819 2703 2116 2852 1166 1686 3925 3393 532 3746
Sub Total 22444 78790 39687 39103 10449 81 54829 30187 24642 23961 9500 14461 39944 36477 2094 38846
7-10 km
23 Ganapathipalayam Rural 4023 14022 7104 6918 2423 0 9682 5333 4349 4340 1771 2569 6846 6484 362 7176
24 Ardanaripalayam Rural 2332 8089 4084 4005 1526 4 6002 3290 2712 2087 794 1293 3887 3478 409 4202
25 Velamapalayam Urban 24381 87427 44353 43074 5257 139 68208 36246 31962 19219 8107 11112 40043 38419 1624 47384
26 Velampalayam Rural 480 1506 758 748 305 0 896 515 381 610 243 367 862 861 1 644
27 Semmandapalayam Rural 496 1566 804 762 357 0 1021 565 456 545 239 306 1023 860 163 543
28 Chinna virangali Rural 783 2649 1349 1300 589 0 1684 986 698 965 363 602 1542 1514 28 1107
29 Nettichelumpalayam Rural 215 728 355 373 103 0 460 260 200 268 95 173 557 395 162 171
30 Mettupudur Rural 726 2465 1252 1213 311 0 1864 1013 851 601 239 362 1208 1167 41 1257
31 Marappanayakkanpalayam Rural 157 544 258 286 255 0 296 157 139 248 101 147 289 56 82 255
32 Vyapadi Rural 591 1791 896 895 153 0 1134 672 462 657 224 433 1094 817 277 697
33 Varappalayam Rural 912 2962 1445 1517 652 0 1624 920 704 1338 525 813 1645 486 209 1317
34 Pappanpalayam Rural 414 1319 663 656 296 0 779 438 341 540 225 315 815 226 24 504
35 Anaippalayam Rural 552 1822 903 919 624 0 1073 637 436 749 266 483 975 903 72 847
36 Ammapalayam Rural 344 1102 544 558 131 0 672 362 310 430 182 248 827 25 434 275
37 Vavipalayam Rural 1904 6468 3253 3215 1656 0 3841 2163 1678 2627 1090 1537 3885 3841 44 2583
38 Kanakkampalayam Rural 3386 12160 6074 6086 728 10 9075 4875 4200 3085 1199 1886 6282 6101 181 5878
39 Andipalayam Urban 7010 25539 12773 12766 2588 17 18682 9818 8864 6857 2955 3902 11967 10981 986 13572
40 Sandaipalayam Rural 1268 4050 2002 2048 1202 0 2479 1412 1067 1571 590 981 2390 516 47 1660
41 Chengalipalayam Urban 7010 25539 12773 12766 2588 17 18682 9818 8864 6857 2955 3902 11967 10981 986 13572
42 Kunnatur Urban 2588 8774 4342 4432 968 0 6642 3571 3071 2132 771 1361 4085 3170 915 4689
Sub Total 59572 210522 105985 104537 22712 187 154796 83051 71745 55726 22934 32792 102189 91281 7047 108333
Grand Total 84961 299284 150704 148580 36008 338 215932 116885 99047 83352 33819 49533 148093 132649 10210 151191
Source: District Census handbook on Landuse, 2011 - Coimbatore & Tiruppur District
Annexure-XXV