Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nuclear weapons have the power to wipe out an entire place and the organisms within it,
so should they be tested regularly and used in war? They are most commonly associated with the
devastation of whole cities, like Hiroshima, and a lot of people fear nuclear weapons because of
that. Some countries, including the United States, have the power to blow up the whole planet
more than once. When is it too much? It also shows that owning nuclear weapons is more of an
egotistical stand point, and that countries are power hungry for world domination. This is
dangerous. I believe that nuclear weapons should not be tested or used in war because owning a
single nuclear weapon has many risk factors and can have several different impacts on the
environment that it is tested in. Some people believe that by using or threatening to use nuclear
weapons, they could be saving the world by deterring major wars from breaking out, but this is
not true.
Nuclear weapons are full of risks. They reek of radiation. The whole industry emits an
unfathomable amount of low level radiation, and with that comes the harm of people. The
radioactive waste can hide itself in clothes, tools, and different materials that people in the
industry use. Exposure to radiation will lead to disability and cancers, and the effect can
continue for decades (Green Garage). The cost of nuclear weapons alone is insane. The cost
of each deployed land-based nuclear weapon would be roughly $85 million (Gronlund). This
can negatively affect the treasury and bring on political criticism. Lastly, who is to say that a
Nuclear weapons also effect the environment they are used in, in many different ways.
Radiation and fallout continue to torment the land years after the bomb has exploded. Thermal
radiation follows the use of these weapons and can cause massive firestorms that can destroy a
lot of extra land (Occupy Theory). Nuclear testing sites have to be put in the middle of nowhere
because of the environmental change the weapon can cause. It is so bad in fact that a whole idea
of radioactive creatures living underwater spawned from the testing site on Bikini Island. This
idea turned into the television show Sponge Bob Square Pants. The show was based on what the
environment was going through while the nuclear weapons were being tested. Granted, Sponge
Bob Square Pants is a kids TV show, but people often make jokes about things that they are
scared of. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are two examples of how destroyed and desolate an
environment becomes after the dropping of the bomb because the bomb was dropped in 1945,
and the two cities are still unable to safely allow humans to reside in the environment.
Some people believe that by using or threatening to use nuclear weapons, they could be
saving the world by deterring major wars from breaking out, but this is not true. In this day and
age, there are many morons and dangerous people who have control over some sort of nuclear
weapon. Since so many people have nuclear bombs, the M.A.D. policy comes into play.
M.A.D. stands for Mutually Assured Destruction, and it means that, for example, if the United
States were to send a nuke to Russia, there would immediately be one coming our way from
Russia. Owning nuclear weapons does not make the country more powerful, it makes the leader
Nuclear weapons should not be tested or used in war because owning a single nuclear
weapon has many risk factors and can have several different impacts on the environment that it is
tested in. Some people believe that by using or threatening to use nuclear weapons, they could
be saving the world by deterring major wars from breaking out, but this is not true. Nuclear
weapons are a danger to us and our environment. I suggest that everyone gets rid of their nuclear
weapons because we only have one Earth, and it should not be ruined so some country can assert