Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Eliminated micro piling for KC ### 22.22 Santosh Yes To protect raintrees geotech consultant had proposed
protecting Raintree's Biraj micropiling we proposed soil nailing and shorcreting thus
saving a huge cost. Proposal is approved by structural
consultant
3 General Excavation Slopes KC 535,500.00 0.30 Santosh Yes Slopes were redesigned with 1:5 slopes as proposed by
Biraj the consultant with 1:2 slopes thus saving 5355 cum of
earth excavation in phase 1
4 Eliminated 350 mm thick raft KC ### 18.78 Santosh Yes Structural consultant had proposed 350 mm thick raft
for non tower area Biraj which was not required and we have proposed isolated
footing in NTA. Our proposal accepted by the structural
consultant. Thus saving huge cost of 4136 cum of
concrete and 240 MT of steel and pcc 1182 cum
5 Tie beams in NTA KC 4,541,000.00 2.52 Santosh Yes Tie beams was provided. But as per soil investigation
Biraj report there was no differential settlement and SBC was
70 t/m2. Hence we asked to avoid tie beams which was
accepted by consultants. Thus savings was achieved on
concrete, rebar and formwork.( estimated 2.5% cost of
foundation system). Data from sterling BOQ
6630 m3 Concrete & rebar 530 MT for foundation
Hence, 0.025 x (14957 x 8000 + 1142 x 50000 + 4884x
1000) = 45,41,000
6 Roof Slab designed for KC 1,400,000.00 0.78 Santosh Yes Roof Slab asked to redesign with 3kN/m2 which was
10kN/m2 Biraj preliminary designed for 10 kN/m2 load. Increased
consumption 27 kg/m3. Hence increase in rebar quantity
is 2.35 MT for each tower. Therefore 2.35 x 17 = 40 MT.
(40 x 35000 = 14,00,000)
SL.NO DESCRIPTION Lead by Amount Cost/Savi Attributa Whether REMARKS
Saved from ngs per ble to any
Approved sft savings
Budget in Time
achieved
7 Cost impact by avoiding KC ### 150.00 Santosh Yes For 6 additonal floors consultant had provided podium
podium slab for provision of 6 Biraj slab to accommodate additional car requirement. We had
additonal floors proposed and substaintiated that the additonal car
parking requirement can be achieved by providing girder
beams within tower footprint and thus saving on a huge
cost of podium slab. Again podium option would require
statuatory approvals.
2 Cost impact due to PCC grade KC 9,403,800.00 5.22 Santosh No The PCC specification is given as M15 which is not
Biraj required for levelling coarse and the same was replaced
by M7.5 which resulted in cost saving.
No rate item for M7.5 and contractor requested to make
use of M15 grade due to site conditions.
3 Cost impact due to clear KC 4,474,400.00 2.49 Santosh Yes All slabs were designed taking 25mm where as code
cover in slabs Biraj specifies 20mm clear cover Thus saving a huge cost by
tweeking the design process
4 Cost impact due to difference KC ### 13.11 Santosh Yes For all buildings, above 1st floor to terrace higher grade
in grade of concrete Biraj of concrete M40/M30 is used for shear walls, slabs. Which
is not required as design passes using M25 grade of
concrete with same consumption of rebar
5 Conducting soil investigation KC ### 6.45 Santosh Yes Raft sizes 520m2. reduction in depth 0.25m. Concrete
for RTB which helped enhance Biraj savings 520 x 0.25 x 11 Towers X 8000Rs = 1,14,40,000
the SBC from 45t/m2 to 70 Saving in shear links in raft 20 dia @ 500mm c/c. Approx
t/m2 in camparision to prior 3MT per tower. Hence for 11 Towers
report. Hence reduction in 33 x 11 x 50,000 = 16,50,00
raft footing sizes and raft
depth from 1000mm to
750mm was achieved.
SL.NO DESCRIPTION Lead by Amount Cost/Savi Attributa Whether REMARKS
Saved from ngs per ble to any
Approved sft savings
Budget in Time
achieved
6 NTA footings were optimised KC 3,570,000.00 1.98 Santosh Yes Instead of providing conventional flat footing stepped
Biraj footing were designed, thereby saving on concrete
quantity. 409 m3 x 8000 = 32,72,000 & formwork 298
m2 x 1000 = 2,98,000
SL.NO DESCRIPTION Lead by Amount Cost/Savi Attributa Whether REMARKS
Saved from ngs per ble to any
Approved sft savings
Budget in Time
achieved
7 In absence of water table (as KC ### 27.82 Santosh Yes Consultants option 1 - 200mm Grade slab,
per soil investigation report). Biraj Steel@50kg/m3, 100mm VDF & sub soil drainage cost -
Design was tweaked to merge 13.35 Cr.
grade slab and VDF for Consultants option -2 - 75mm PCC, WP, 150mm stitch
basement floor finishes. slab M30, Steel 40kg/m3, 200 mm GSB, LDPE, 100mm
VDF cost - 13.35 Cr.
Tweaked design - 175mm GSB, LDPE, 125mm VDF
@40kg/m3 - cost - 8.35 Cr.
Hence saving - 5 Cr. Which is accepted by consultant to
release as GFC.
8 Sterling BOQ to Cratis BOQ, it KC ### 66.67 Santosh Yes In comparision to sterling quantities, the design of towers
is estimated to make target Biraj was tweaked and initial assement on quantities for
savings for 17 towers in concrete, reinforcement and formwork is estimated at 12
concrete, reinforcement and Cr. Workings is attached.
formwork
9 Variation in BOQ was stated KC 2,420,000.00 2.20 Santosh Yes Checked in depth to understand the extra claims by
in the soil investigation Biraj vendor w.r.t actual variation and it was found only upto
conducted by vendor for SEZ 3.8 lakhs was varying in BOQ.
for 48 boreholes to the Hence saving 28 - 3.8 = 24.2 lakhs.
tune28 lakhs.
3,682,207
1,177,877
1,177,877
10,471,090
1,468,155
489,856
4,917,888
16,678,505
9,561,380
12,607,037
6,330,739
6,544,695
18,078,160
18,078,160
7,535,381
806,603
123,085,097